Skip to main content

Advertisement

The Minkowski inequalities via generalized proportional fractional integral operators

Abstract

Recent research has gained more attention on conformable integrals and derivatives to derive the various type of inequalities. One of the recent advancements in the field of fractional calculus is the generalized nonlocal proportional fractional integrals and derivatives lately introduced by Jarad et al. (Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 226:3457–3471, 2017) comprising the exponential functions in the kernels. The principal aim of this paper is to establish reverse Minkowski inequalities and some other fractional integral inequalities by utilizing generalized proportional fractional integrals. Also, two new theorems connected with this inequality as well as other inequalities associated with the generalized proportional fractional integrals are established.

Introduction

Fractional calculus is a study of integrals and derivatives of arbitrary order which was a natural outgrowth of conventional definitions of calculus integral and derivative. Fractional integral has been comprehensively studied in the literature. The idea has been defined by numerous mathematicians with a slightly different formula, for example, Riemann–Liouville, Weyl, Erdélyi–Kober, Hadamard integral, Liouville and Katugampola fractional integral (see [18, 22, 23, 26, 34]). In the last few years, Khalil et al. [24] and Abdeljawad [1] established a new class of fractional derivatives and integrals called fractional conformable derivatives and integrals. Jarad et al. [21] introduced the fractional conformable integral operators. On the basis of that idea, one can obtain the generalizations of the inequalities: Hadamard, Hermite–Hadamard, Opial, Grüss, Ostrowski, Chebyshev, among others [19, 35, 37,38,39]).

Later on in [6], Anderson and Ulness improved the idea of the fractional conformable derivative by introducing the idea of local derivatives. In [2, 3, 7, 9, 27] researchers introduced new fractional derivative operators by using exponential and Mittag-Leffler functions in their kernels. In [20], Jarad et al. proposed the left and right generalized nonlocal proportional fractional integral and derivative operators. Such generalizations motivate future research to present more innovative ideas to unify the fractional operators and obtain the inequalities involving such fractional operators. The integral inequalities and their applications play an essential role in the theory of differential equations and applied mathematics. A variety of various types of some classical integral inequalities and their generalizations have been established by utilizing the classical fractional integral, fractional derivative operators (see, e.g., [4, 12, 14,15,16,17, 25, 28,29,30, 32, 33, 36, 41, 42, 46, 47]).

The reverse Minkowski fractional integral inequalities are perceived in [13]. Anber et al. [5] have gained some fractional integral inequalities by using Riemann–Liouville fractional integral. In [11], the authors established Minkowski inequalities and some other inequalities by employing Katugampola fractional integral operators. In [10, 45], the authors established the reverse Minkowski inequality for Hadamard fractional integral operators. In [31], Mubeen et al. recently established the reverse Minkowski inequalities and some related inequalities for generalized k-fractional conformable integrals.

This paper is organized as follows: In the second section, we present some known results and basic definitions. In the third section, the reverse Minkowski inequalities are presented. In the fourth section, some other related inequalities involving generalized nonlocal proportional fractional integrals are presented.

Preliminaries

This section is devoted to some known definitions and results associated with the classical Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals and their generalization involving the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Set et al. [40] presented Hermite–Hadamard and reverse Minkowski inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. In [8], Bougoffa also presented Hardy’s and reverse Minkowski inequalities. The following theorems involving the reverse Minkowski inequalities are the motivation of work performed so far, involving the classical Riemann integrals.

Theorem 2.1

([40])

Let \(r\geq 1\) and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )} \leq M\), \(\vartheta \in [a,b]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}g^{r}(\vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{1/r}+ \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}h^{r}(\vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{1/r} \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1+M(m+2)}{(m+1)(M+1)} \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}(g+h)^{r}(\vartheta ) \,d \vartheta \biggr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(1)

Theorem 2.2

([40])

Let \(r\geq 1\) and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )} \leq M\), \(\vartheta \in [a,b]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}g^{r}(\vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{2/r}+ \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}h^{r}(\vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{2/r} \\ &\quad \geq \biggl(\frac{(M+1)(m+1)}{M}-2 \biggr) \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}g^{r}( \vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{1/r} \biggl( \int _{a}^{b}h^{r}(\vartheta )\,d \vartheta \biggr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(2)

Definition 2.1

([26, 34])

The left and right R-L fractional integrals of order λ are respectively defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g \bigr) ( \vartheta )=\frac{1}{ \varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }(\vartheta -\rho )^{\lambda -1}g( \rho )\,d\rho ,\quad a< \vartheta \end{aligned}$$
(3)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl(\mathfrak{I}_{b}^{\lambda }g \bigr) ( \vartheta )=\frac{1}{ \varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{\vartheta }^{b}(\rho -\vartheta )^{\lambda -1}g( \rho )\,d\rho ,\quad \vartheta < b, \end{aligned}$$
(4)

where \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\) and \(\Re (\lambda )>0\).

In [13], Dahmani introduced the following reverse Minkowski inequalities involving the R-L fractional integral operators.

Theorem 2.3

([13])

Let \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that, for all \(\vartheta >0\), \(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g^{r}( \vartheta )<\infty \), \(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }h^{r}(\vartheta )< \infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), \(\rho \in [a, \vartheta ]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}+ \bigl(\mathfrak{I} ^{\lambda }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}\leq \frac{1+M(m+2)}{(m+1)(M+1)} \bigl( \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }(g+h)^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{ 1/r }. \end{aligned}$$
(5)

Theorem 2.4

([13])

Let \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that, for all \(\vartheta >0\), \(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g^{r}( \vartheta )<\infty \), \(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }h^{r}(\vartheta )< \infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), \(\rho \in [a, \vartheta ]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} & \bigl(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{2/r}+ \bigl(\mathfrak{I} ^{\lambda }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{2/r} \\ &\quad \geq \biggl(\frac{(M+1)(m+1)}{M}-2 \biggr) \bigl(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }g ^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \bigl(\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(6)

Definition 2.2

([20])

The left and right generalized nonlocal proportional integral operators are respectively defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g \bigr) ( \vartheta )=\frac{1}{ \eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{ \eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr] (\vartheta -\rho )^{\lambda -1}g( \rho )\,d\rho \end{aligned}$$
(7)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl(\mathfrak{I}_{b}^{\lambda ,\eta }g \bigr) ( \vartheta )=\frac{1}{ \eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{\vartheta }^{b}\exp \biggl[\frac{ \eta -1}{\eta }( \rho -\vartheta )\biggr](\rho -\vartheta )^{\lambda -1}g( \rho )\,d\rho , \end{aligned}$$
(8)

where \(\eta \in (0,1]\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\) and \(\Re (\lambda )>0\).

Remark 2.1

If we consider \(\eta =1\) in (7) and (8), then we get the left and right Riemann–Liouville (3) and (4) respectively.

Reverse Minkowski inequalities via generalized proportional fractional integral operator

In this section, we use generalized nonlocal proportional fractional integral operator to develop reverse Minkowski integral inequalities. The reverse Minkowski fractional integral inequality is presented in the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that, for all \(\vartheta >0\), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }g^{r}(\vartheta )<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }h^{r}(\vartheta )<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h( \rho )}\leq M\), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}+ \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \leq \frac{1+M(m+2)}{(m+1)(M+1)} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{ \lambda ,\eta }(g+h)^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(9)

Proof

Under the condition stated in Theorem 3.1, \(\frac{g(\rho )}{h( \rho )}\leq M\), \(\rho \in [0,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >0\), we have

$$ (M+1)^{r} g^{r}(\rho )\leq M^{r} (g+h )^{r}(\rho ). $$
(10)

Consider a function

$$\begin{aligned} \mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho ) &=\frac{1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma ( \lambda )}\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }(\vartheta -\rho )\biggr] (\vartheta - \rho )^{\lambda -1} \\ &= \frac{1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )}(\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1} \biggl[1+ \frac{\eta -1}{\eta }(\vartheta -\rho )+\frac{ (\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }(\vartheta -\rho ) )^{2}}{2}+\cdots \biggr]. \end{aligned}$$
(11)

We observe that the function \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) remains positive for all \(\rho \in (a,\vartheta )\), \(a<\vartheta \leq b\), since each term of the above function is positive in view of conditions stated in Theorem 3.1.

Multiplying both sides of (10) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta , \rho )\) and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to ρ from a to ϑ, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{(M+1)^{r} }{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr] (\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}g^{r}(\rho )\,d\rho \\ &\quad \leq \frac{M^{r} }{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{ \vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr] (\vartheta -\rho )^{\lambda -1} (g+h )^{r}(\rho )\,d\rho , \end{aligned}$$

which can be written as

$$ {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \leq \frac{M^{r}}{(M+1)^{r}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } (g+h ) ^{r}(\vartheta ). $$

Hence, it follows that

$$ \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \frac{M}{(M+1)} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } (g+h )^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}. $$
(12)

Now, using the condition \(mg(\rho )\leq h(\rho )\), we have

$$ \biggl(1+\frac{1}{m} \biggr)h(\rho )\leq \frac{1}{m} \bigl(g(\rho )+h( \rho ) \bigr), $$

it follows that

$$ \biggl(1+\frac{1}{m} \biggr)^{r} h^{r}(\rho )\leq \biggl(\frac{1}{m}\biggr)^{r} \bigl(g(\rho )+h(\rho ) \bigr)^{r}. $$
(13)

Multiplying both sides of (13) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta , \rho )\) and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to ρ from a to ϑ, we have

$$ \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \frac{1}{(m+1)} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } (g+h )^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}. $$
(14)

Thus adding inequalities (12) and (14) yields the desired inequality. □

Theorem 3.2

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that, for all \(\vartheta >0\), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }g^{r}(\vartheta )<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }h^{r}(\vartheta )<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h( \rho )}\leq M\), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), then the following inequality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} & \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{2/r}+ \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{2/r} \\ &\quad \geq \biggl(\frac{(M+1)(m+1)}{M}-2 \biggr) \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{ \lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(15)

Proof

The multiplication of inequalities (12) and (14) yields

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl(\frac{(M+1)(m+1)}{M} \biggr) \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{ \lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}\leq \bigl[ \bigl({} _{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+ h(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{r} \bigr)^{1/r} \bigr]^{2}. \end{aligned}$$
(16)

Now, applying the Minkowski inequality to the right-hand side of (16), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} & \bigl[ \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+ h(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r} \bigr]^{2} \\ &\quad \leq \bigl[ \bigl({} _{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}+ \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \bigr]^{2} \\ &\quad \leq \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{2/r}+ \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{2/r}+2 \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

Thus, from inequalities (16) and (17), we get the desired inequality (15). □

Certain related inequalities via generalized proportional fractional integral operator

This section is devoted to deriving certain related inequalities involving a generalized proportional fractional integral operator.

Theorem 4.1

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r>1\), \(1/r+1/s =1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g(\vartheta )]<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h(\vartheta )]< \infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M<\infty \), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/s} \leq \biggl(\frac{M}{m} \biggr)^{1/rs} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{ \lambda ,\eta } \bigl[g(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/s} \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Proof

Since \(\frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M<\infty \), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), therefore we have

(19)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho ) \bigr]^{1/s} &\geq M^{-1/r}\bigl[g(\rho ) \bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[g( \rho )\bigr]^{1/s} \\ &\geq M^{-1/s}\bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]^{\frac{1}{r}+{1/s}} \\ &\geq M^{-1/r}\bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
(20)

Multiplying both sides of (20) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta , \rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to ρ from a to ϑ, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{ 1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta } \exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}\bigl[g(\rho ) \bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho )\bigr]^{1/s}\,d\rho \\ &\quad \geq \frac{M^{-1/r} }{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{ \vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta - \rho )^{\lambda -1}g(\rho )\,d\rho . \end{aligned}$$
(21)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[\bigl[g( \vartheta )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h( \vartheta )\bigr]^{1/s} \bigr]\geq M^{\frac{-1}{r}} \bigl[{}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g( \vartheta ) \bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Consequently, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[ \bigl[g(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h( \vartheta )\bigr]^{1/s} \bigr] \bigr)^{1/r}\geq M^{\frac{-1}{rs}} \bigl[{}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h(\vartheta ) \bigr]^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(23)

On the other hand, \(m g(\rho )\leq h(\rho )\), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), therefore we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]^{1/r}\geq m^{1/r} \bigl[h(\rho )\bigr]^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho ) \bigr]^{1/s} &\geq m^{1/r}\bigl[g(\rho )\bigr]^{1/r} \bigl[h( \rho )\bigr]^{1/s} \\ &\geq m^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho )\bigr]^{\frac{1}{r}+{1/s}} \\ &\geq m^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho )\bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
(25)

Again, multiplying both sides of (25) by \(\mathfrak{F}( \vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant inequality with respect to ρ from a to ϑ, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{ 1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta } \exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}\bigl[g(\rho ) \bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\rho )\bigr]^{1/s}\,d\rho \\ & \quad \geq \frac{m^{1/r}}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{ \vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta - \rho )^{\lambda -1}h(\rho )\,d\rho . \end{aligned}$$
(26)

Hence, we can write

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[ \bigl[g(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h( \vartheta )\bigr]^{1/s} \bigr] \bigr)^{1/r}\geq m^{\frac{1}{rs}} \bigl[{}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g(\vartheta ) \bigr]^{1/s}. \end{aligned}$$
(27)

Multiplying (23) and (27), we get the desired inequality. □

Theorem 4.2

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r>1\), \(\frac{1}{r}+{1/s}=1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g^{r}( \vartheta )]<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h^{s}( \vartheta )]<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )^{r}}{h(\rho )^{s}} \leq M<\infty \), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{s}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/s}\leq \biggl(\frac{M}{m} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{rs}} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[g(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/r}\bigl[h(\vartheta )\bigr]^{1/s} \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(28)

Proof

Replacing \(g(\vartheta )\) and \(h(\vartheta )\) by \(g^{r}(\vartheta )\) and \(h^{r}(\vartheta )\), \(a<\vartheta \leq b\) in Theorem 4.1, we get the desired inequality (28). □

Theorem 4.3

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r>1\), \(\frac{1}{r}+{1/s}=1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g^{r}( \vartheta )]<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h^{s}( \vartheta )]<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g^{r}(\rho )}{h^{s}(\rho )} \leq M<\infty \) where \(m, M\in \mathbb{R}\), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), then the following inequality for left generalized proportional fractional integral holds:

$$\begin{aligned} _{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }\bigl[g(\vartheta )h(\vartheta )\bigr]\leq \frac{2^{r-1}M ^{r}}{r(M+1)^{r}}{}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }\bigl[g^{r}+h^{p}\bigr]( \vartheta )+ \frac{2^{s-1}}{s(m+1)^{s}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta } \bigl[g^{s}+h^{s}\bigr](\vartheta ). \end{aligned}$$
(29)

Proof

By the given hypothesis \(\frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} (M+1)^{r}g^{r}(\rho )\leq M^{r}[g+h]^{r}(\rho ). \end{aligned}$$
(30)

Multiplying both sides of inequality (30) by \(\mathfrak{F}( \vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{(M+1)^{r}}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}g^{r}(\rho )\,d\rho \\ & \quad \leq \frac{M^{r}}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{ \vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta - \rho )^{\lambda -1}[g+h]^{r}( \rho )\,d\rho . \end{aligned}$$
(31)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta )\leq \frac{M^{r}}{(M+1)^{r}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{r}( \vartheta ). \end{aligned}$$
(32)

On the other hand, using \(m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\), \(a< t<\vartheta \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} (m+1)^{s} h^{s}(\rho )\leq [g+h]^{s}(\rho ). \end{aligned}$$
(33)

Again, multiplying both sides of inequality (33) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta , \rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{s}( \vartheta )\leq \frac{1}{(m+1)^{s}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{s}( \vartheta ). \end{aligned}$$
(34)

Now, using Young’s inequality, we have

$$\begin{aligned} g(\rho )h(\rho )\leq \frac{g^{r}(\rho )}{r}+ \frac{g^{s}(\rho )}{s}. \end{aligned}$$
(35)

Multiplying both sides of inequality (33) by \(\mathfrak{F}( \vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} _{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g(\vartheta )h( \vartheta )\leq \frac{1}{r} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)+ {1/s} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } g^{s}( \vartheta ) \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(36)

With the aid of (32) and (34), (36) can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g(\vartheta )h( \vartheta ) &\leq \frac{1}{r} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)+ {1/s} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } g^{s}( \vartheta ) \bigr) \\ & \leq \frac{M^{r}}{r(M+1)^{r}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{r}( \vartheta )+\frac{1}{s(m+1)^{s}}{}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{s}( \vartheta ). \end{aligned}$$
(37)

Now, using the inequality \((\rho +\omega )^{r}\leq 2^{s-1}(\rho ^{r}+ \omega ^{r})\), \(r>1\), \(\rho , \omega >0\), one can obtain

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{r}( \vartheta )\leq {}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[g^{r}+h^{r}\bigr](\vartheta ) \end{aligned}$$
(38)

and

$$\begin{aligned} {}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{s}( \vartheta )\leq {}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[g^{s}+h^{s}\bigr](\vartheta ). \end{aligned}$$
(39)

Hence the proof of (29) can follow from (37), (38), and (39). □

Theorem 4.4

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g^{r}(\vartheta )]< \infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h^{r}(\vartheta )]< \infty \). If \(0< k< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M<\infty \), where \(m, M\in \mathbb{R}\), \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), then the following inequality for left generalized proportional fractional integral holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{M+1}{M-k} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }\bigl[g(\vartheta )-kh(\vartheta )\bigr] \bigr) &\leq \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}+ \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{ \lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \\ &\leq \frac{m+1}{m-k} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl[g( \vartheta )-kh(\vartheta )\bigr] \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(40)

Proof

Under the given hypothesis \(0< k< m\leq \frac{g^{r}(\rho )}{h^{s}( \rho )}\leq M<\infty \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} mk\leq Mk\quad &\Rightarrow\quad mk+m\leq mk+M\leq Mk+M\, \\ &\Rightarrow\quad (M+1) (m-k)\leq (m+1) (M-k). \end{aligned}$$

It can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{ (M+1)}{(M-k)}\leq \frac{(m+1)}{(m-k)}. \end{aligned}$$

Also, we have

$$\begin{aligned} m-k\leq \frac{g(\rho )-kh(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M-k. \end{aligned}$$

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{ (g(\rho )-kh(\rho ) )^{r}}{(M-k)^{r}}\leq h^{r}( \rho )\leq \frac{ (g(\rho )-kh(\rho ) )^{r}}{(m-k)^{r}}. \end{aligned}$$
(41)

Also, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M}\leq \frac{h(\rho )}{g(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{m}\quad \Rightarrow\quad \frac{m-k}{km}\leq \frac{g(\rho )-kh(\rho )}{kg(\rho )}\leq \frac{M-k}{kM}. \end{aligned}$$

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl(\frac{M}{M-k} \biggr)^{r}\leq \bigl(g(\rho )-kh(\rho ) \bigr) ^{r}\leq g^{r}(\rho )\leq \biggl(\frac{m}{m-k} \biggr)^{r}\leq \bigl(g( \rho )-kh(\rho ) \bigr)^{r}. \end{aligned}$$
(42)

Multiplying both sides of inequality (41) by \(\mathfrak{F}( \vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{(M-k)^{r} \eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1} \bigl(g(\rho )-kh(\rho ) \bigr)^{r} \,d\rho \\ & \quad \leq \frac{1}{ \eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}h^{r}(\rho )\,d\rho \\ & \quad \leq \frac{1}{(m-k)^{r} \eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a} ^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{\lambda -1} \bigl(g(\rho )-kh(\rho ) \bigr)^{r}\,d\rho . \end{aligned}$$

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{(M-k)} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g( \vartheta )-kh(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r} &\leq \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r} \\ & \leq \frac{1}{(m-k)} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g( \vartheta )-kh(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(43)

Again, multiplying both sides of inequality (42) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta , \rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl(\frac{M}{M-k} \biggr) \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda , \eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )-kh(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r} & \leq \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \\ & \leq \biggl(\frac{m}{m-k} \biggr) \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )-kh(\vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(44)

Hence, by adding inequalities (43) and (44), we get the desired inequality (40). □

Theorem 4.5

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g^{r}(\vartheta )]< \infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h^{r}(\vartheta )]< \infty \). If \(0\leq \alpha \leq g(\rho )\leq \mathcal{A}\) and \(0\leq \sigma \leq h(\rho )\leq \mathcal{B}\) for all \(\rho \in [a, \vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), then the following inequality for left generalized proportional fractional integral holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}+ \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \leq \frac{\mathcal{A}(\alpha +\mathcal{B})+\mathcal{B}(\sigma +\mathcal{A})}{(\mathcal{A}+\sigma )(\mathcal{B}+\alpha )} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g+h]^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(45)

Proof

Under the given hypothesis, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\mathcal{B}}\leq \frac{1}{h(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{\sigma }. \end{aligned}$$
(46)

The product of inequality (46) with \(0\leq \alpha \leq g( \rho )\leq \mathcal{A}\) yields

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\alpha }{\mathcal{B}}\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq \frac{ \mathcal{A}}{\sigma }. \end{aligned}$$
(47)

From (47), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} h^{r}(\rho )\leq \biggl(\frac{\mathcal{B}}{\alpha +\mathcal{B}} \biggr) ^{r} \bigl(g(\rho )+h(\rho ) \bigr)^{r} \end{aligned}$$
(48)

and

$$\begin{aligned} g^{r}(\rho )\leq \biggl(\frac{\mathcal{A}}{\sigma +\mathcal{A}} \biggr) ^{r} \bigl(g(\rho )+h(\rho ) \bigr)^{r}. \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Now, multiplying both sides of inequalities (48) and (49) respectively by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \biggl(\frac{\mathcal{B}}{\alpha +\mathcal{B}} \biggr) \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+h( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r} \end{aligned}$$
(50)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \biggl(\frac{\mathcal{A}}{\sigma +\mathcal{A}} \biggr) \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+h( \vartheta ) \bigr)^{r} \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(51)

Hence, by adding (50) and (51), we get the desired proof. □

Theorem 4.6

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g(\vartheta )]<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h(\vartheta )]<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\) where \(m, M\in \mathbb{R}\) for all \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), then the following inequality for the left generalized proportional fractional integral holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g(\vartheta )h( \vartheta ) \bigr) &\leq \frac{1}{(m+1)(M+1)} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+h(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{2} \bigr) \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{m} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g( \vartheta )h(\vartheta ) \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(52)

Proof

Under the given hypothesis, \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} h(\rho ) (m+1)\leq h(\rho )+g(\rho )\leq h(\rho ) (M+1). \end{aligned}$$
(53)

Also, we have \(\frac{1}{M}\leq \frac{h(\rho )}{g(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{m}\), which gives

$$\begin{aligned} g(\rho ) \biggl(\frac{M+1}{M} \biggr)\leq g(\rho )+h( \rho )\leq g( \rho ) \biggl(\frac{m+1}{m} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(54)

The multiplication of (53) and (54) yields

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{g(\rho )h(\rho )}{M}\leq \frac{ (g(\rho )+h(\rho ) ) ^{2}}{(m+1)(M+1)}\leq \frac{g(\rho )h(\rho )}{m}. \end{aligned}$$
(55)

Now, multiplying both sides of inequality (55) by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{M\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta } \exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}g(\rho )h(\rho )\,d\rho \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{(m+1)(M+1)\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a} ^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{\lambda -1} \bigl(g(\rho )+h(\rho ) \bigr)^{2}\,d\rho \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{m\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta }\exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}g(\rho )h(\rho )\,d \rho. \end{aligned}$$
(56)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g( \vartheta )h( \vartheta ) \bigr) &\leq \frac{1}{(m+1)(M+1)} \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } \bigl(g(\vartheta )+h(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{2} \bigr) \\ &\leq \frac{1}{m} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g( \vartheta )h(\vartheta ) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$

which completes the desired proof. □

Theorem 4.7

Let \(\eta \in (0,1]\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\Re (\lambda )>0\), \(r\geq 1\), and let g, h be two positive functions on \([0,\infty )\) such that \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[g(\vartheta )]<\infty \), \({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }[h(\vartheta )]<\infty \). If \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), where \(m, M\in \mathbb{R}\) for all \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), then the following inequality for the left generalized proportional fractional integral holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}+ \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}(\vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r} \leq 2 \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r} \bigl(g( \vartheta ),h(\vartheta ) \bigr) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$
(57)

where \(h (g(\vartheta ),h(\vartheta ) )=\max \{M [ (\frac{M}{m}+1 )g(\rho )-Mh(\rho ) ],\frac{(m+M)h( \rho )-g(\rho )}{m} \}\).

Proof

Under the given hypothesis \(0< m\leq \frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M\), where \(\rho \in [a,\vartheta ]\), \(\vartheta >a\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} 0< m\leq M+m-\frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )} \end{aligned}$$
(58)

and

$$\begin{aligned} M+m-\frac{g(\rho )}{h(\rho )}\leq M. \end{aligned}$$
(59)

From (58) and (59), we have

$$\begin{aligned} h(\rho )< \frac{(M+m)h(\rho )-g(\rho )}{m}\leq h \bigl(g(\rho ),h( \rho ) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$
(60)

where \(h (g(\vartheta ),h(\vartheta ) )=\max \{M [ (\frac{M}{m}+1 )g(\rho )-Mh(\rho ) ],\frac{(m+M)h( \rho )-g(\rho )}{m} \}\). Also, from the given hypothesis \(0<\frac{1}{M}\leq \frac{h(\rho )}{g(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{m}\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M}\leq \frac{1}{M}+ \frac{1}{m}-\frac{h(\rho )}{g(\rho )} \end{aligned}$$
(61)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M}+\frac{1}{m}- \frac{h(\rho )}{g(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{m}. \end{aligned}$$
(62)

From (61) and (62), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{M}\leq \frac{ (\frac{1}{M}+\frac{1}{m} )g(\rho )-h( \rho )}{g(\rho )}\leq \frac{1}{m}. \end{aligned}$$
(63)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} g(\rho ) &=M \biggl(\frac{1}{M}+\frac{1}{m} \biggr)g(\rho )-Mh(\rho ) \\ &= \frac{M (M+m )g(\rho )-M^{2}mh(\rho )}{mM} \\ &= \biggl(\frac{M}{m}+1 \biggr)g(\rho )-Mh(\rho ) \\ &= M \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{M}{m}+1 \biggr)g(\rho )-Mh(\rho ) \biggr] \\ & \leq h \bigl(g(\rho ), h(\rho ) \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(64)

From (60) and (64), we can write

$$\begin{aligned} g^{r}(\rho )\leq h \bigl(g(\rho ), h(\rho ) \bigr) \end{aligned}$$
(65)

and

$$\begin{aligned} h^{r}(\rho )\leq h^{r} \bigl(g(\rho ),h(\rho ) \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(66)

Now, multiplying both sides of inequalities (65) and (62) respectively by \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) where \(\mathfrak{F}(\vartheta ,\rho )\) is defined by (11) and integrating the resultant identity with respect to ρ over \((a,\vartheta )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta } \exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1}g^{r}(\rho )\,d\rho \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{\eta ^{\lambda }\varGamma (\lambda )} \int _{a}^{\vartheta } \exp \biggl[\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }( \vartheta -\rho )\biggr](\vartheta -\rho )^{ \lambda -1} h \bigl(g(\rho ), h( \rho ) \bigr)\,d\rho . \end{aligned}$$
(67)

It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }g^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta } h \bigl(g( \vartheta ), h(\vartheta ) \bigr) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(68)

Similarly, from (62), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{a}\mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r}( \vartheta ) \bigr) ^{1/r}\leq \bigl({}_{a} \mathfrak{I}^{\lambda ,\eta }h^{r} \bigl(g( \vartheta ),h(\vartheta ) \bigr) \bigr)^{1/r}. \end{aligned}$$
(69)

Hence, by adding (68) and (69), we get the desired proof. □

Concluding remarks

In this paper, we presented the Minkowski inequalities and some other related inequalities via generalized nonlocal proportional fractional integral operators. The results exhibited in Sect. 3 generalized the work earlier done by Dahmani [13] for Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator. Also, the special cases of the results presented in Sect. 3 are found in [40]. The inequalities established in Sect. 4 generalized the inequalities earlier obtained by Suliman [44]. Also, our result will reduce to some classical results which are found in the work of Sroysang [43].

References

  1. 1.

    Abdeljawad, T.: On conformable fractional calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 279, 57–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.10.016

  2. 2.

    Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: Monotonicity results for fractional difference operators with discrete exponential kernels. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1126-1

  3. 3.

    Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: On fractional derivatives with exponential kernel and their discrete versions. Rep. Math. Phys. 80, 11–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(17)30059-9

  4. 4.

    Alzabut, J., Abdeljawad, T., Jarad, F., Sudsutad, W.: A Gronwall inequality via the generalized proportional fractional derivative with applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 101 (2019)

  5. 5.

    Anber, A., Dahmani, Z., Bendoukha, B.: New integral inequalities of Feng Qi type via Riemann-Liouville fractional integration. Facta Univ., Ser. Math. Inform. 27(2), 13–22 (2012)

  6. 6.

    Anderson, D.R., Ulness, D.J.: Newly defined conformable derivatives. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 10(2), 109–137 (2015)

  7. 7.

    Atangana, A., Baleanu, D.: New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 20, 763–769 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI160111018A

  8. 8.

    Bougoffa, L.: On Minkowski and Hardy integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 7(2), Article ID 60 (2006)

  9. 9.

    Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 73–85 (2015)

  10. 10.

    Chinchane, V.L., Pachpatte, D.B.: New fractional inequalities via Hadamard fractional integral. Int. J. Funct. Anal. Oper. Theory Appl. 5, 165–176 (2013)

  11. 11.

    da Vanterler, J., Sousa, C., Capelas de Oliveira, E.: The Minkowski’s inequality by means of a generalized fractional integral. AIMS Ser. Appl. Math. 3, 131–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3934/Math.2018.1.131

  12. 12.

    da Vanterler, J., Sousa, C., Oliveira, D.S., Capelas de Oliveira, E.: Grüss-type inequalities by means of generalized fractional integrals. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-019-00138-z

  13. 13.

    Dahmani, Z.: On Minkowski and Hermite-Hadamard integral inequalities via fractional integral. Ann. Funct. Anal. 1, 51–58 (2010)

  14. 14.

    Dahmani, Z.: New inequalities in fractional integrals. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 9(4), 493–497 (2010)

  15. 15.

    Dahmani, Z., Tabharit, L.: On weighted Gruss type inequalities via fractional integration. J. Adv. Res. Pure Math. 2, 31–38 (2010)

  16. 16.

    Dragomir, S.S.: A generalization of Gruss’s inequality in inner product spaces and applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 237(1), 74–82 (1999)

  17. 17.

    Dragomir, S.S.: Some integral inequalities of Gruss type. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 31(4), 397–415 (2002)

  18. 18.

    Herrmann, R.: Fractional Calculus: An Introduction for Physicists. World Scientific, Singapore (2011)

  19. 19.

    Huang, C.J., Rahman, G., Nisar, K.S., Ghaffar, A., Qi, F.: Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for k-fractional conformable integrals. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 16(1), 1–9 (2019)

  20. 20.

    Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Alzabut, J.: Generalized fractional derivatives generated by a class of local proportional derivatives. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 226, 3457–3471 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2018-00021-7

  21. 21.

    Jarad, F., Ugrlu, E., Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: On a new class of fractional operators. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017(1), 247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1306-z

  22. 22.

    Katugampola, U.N.: A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 6, 1–15 (2014)

  23. 23.

    Katugampola, U.N.: New fractional integral unifying six existing fractional integrals (2016) arXiv:1612.08596

  24. 24.

    Khalil, R., Al Horani, M., Yousef, A., Sababheh, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 264(65), 65–70 (2014)

  25. 25.

    Khan, H., Abdeljawad, T., Tunç, C., Alkhazzan, A., Khan, A.: Minkowski’s inequality for the AB-fractional integral operator. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 96 (2019)

  26. 26.

    Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 207. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

  27. 27.

    Losada, J., Nieto, J.J.: Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 87–92 (2015)

  28. 28.

    McD Mercer, A.: An improvement of the Gruss inequality. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 10(4), Article ID 93 (2005)

  29. 29.

    McD Mercer, A., Mercer, P.: New proofs of the Gruss inequality. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1(2), Article ID 12 (2004)

  30. 30.

    Mitrinovic, D.S., Pecaric, J.E., Fink, A.M.: Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

  31. 31.

    Mubeen, S., Habib, S., Naeem, M.N.: The Minkowski inequality involving generalized k-fractional conformable integral, Mubeen et al. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2040-8

  32. 32.

    Nisar, K.S., Qi, F., Rahman, G., Mubeen, S., Arshad, M.: Some inequalities involving the extended gamma function and the Kummer confluent hypergeometric k-function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 135 (2018)

  33. 33.

    Nisar, K.S., Rahman, G., Choi, J., Mubeen, S., Arshad, M.: Certain Gronwall type inequalities associated with Riemann-Liouville k- and Hadamard k-fractional derivatives and their applications. East Asian Math. J. 34(3), 249–263 (2018)

  34. 34.

    Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equation. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 198. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

  35. 35.

    Qi, F., Rahman, G., Hussain, S.M., Du, W.S., Nisar, K.S.: Some inequalities of Čebyšev type for conformable k-fractional integral operators. Symmetry 10, 614 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110614

  36. 36.

    Rahman, G., Nisar, K.S., Mubeen, S., Choi, J.: Certain inequalities involving the \((k,\rho )\)-fractional integral operator. Far East J. Math. Sci.: FJMS 103(11), 1879–1888 (2018)

  37. 37.

    Rahman, G., Nisar, K.S., Qi, F.: Some new inequalities of the Gruss type for conformable fractional integrals. AIMS Ser. Appl. Math. 3(4), 575–583 (2018)

  38. 38.

    Rahman, G., Ullah, Z., Khan, A., Set, E., Nisar, K.S.: Certain Chebyshev type inequalities involving fractional conformable integral operators. Mathematics 7, 364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/math7040364

  39. 39.

    Set, E., Mumcu, İ., Demirbaş, S.: Conformable fractional integral inequalities of Chebyshev type. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 113(3), 2253–2259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-018-0614-9

  40. 40.

    Set, E., Özdemir, M., Dragomir, S.: On the Hermite-Hadamard inequality and other integral inequalities involving two functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 148102 (2010)

  41. 41.

    Set, E., Tomar, M., Sarikaya, M.Z.: On generalized Grüss type inequalities for k-fractional integrals. Appl. Math. Comput. 269, 29–34 (2015)

  42. 42.

    Sousa, J., Capelas de Oliveira, E.: The Minkowski’s inequality by means of a generalized fractional integral. AIMS Ser. Appl. Math. 3(1), 131–147 (2018)

  43. 43.

    Sroysang, B.: More on reverses of Minkowski’s integral inequality. Math. Æterna 3, 597–600 (2013)

  44. 44.

    Sulaiman, W.T.: Reverses of Minkowski’s, Hölder’s, and Hardy’s integral inequalities. Int. J. Mod. Math. Sci. 1, 14–24 (2012)

  45. 45.

    Taf, S., Brahim, K.: Some new results using Hadamard fractional integral. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 7, 103–109 (2015)

  46. 46.

    Usta, F., Budak, H., Ertuǧral, F., Sarıkaya, M.Z.: The Minkowski’s inequalities utilizing newly defined generalized fractional integral operators. Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Sér. A1 Math. Stat. 68(1), 686–701 (2019)

  47. 47.

    Vanterlerda, J., Sousa, C., Capelas de Oliveira, E.: On the Ψ-fractional integral and applications. Comput. Appl. Math. 38, 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0774-z

Download references

Acknowledgements

Further we are thankful to the anonymous referee for useful suggestions.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

The third author would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM) group number RG-DES-2017-01-17.

Author information

All authors have done equal contribution in this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Thabet Abdeljawad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There does not exist any competing interest regarding this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

MSC

  • 26D10
  • 26A33
  • 05A30

Keywords

  • Minkowski inequalities
  • Generalized proportional fractional integral operator
  • Inequality