- Research
- Open Access
Global Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization for fractional-order neural networks: an LMI-based approach
- Huaiqin Wu^{1}Email author,
- Lifei Wang^{1}Email author,
- Yu Wang^{1},
- Peifeng Niu^{2} and
- Bolin Fang^{3}
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0857-8
© Wu et al. 2016
- Received: 2 December 2015
- Accepted: 6 May 2016
- Published: 13 May 2016
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the global projective synchronization issue for fractional neural networks in the Mittag-Leffler stability sense. Firstly, a fractional-order differential inequality in the existing literature for the Caputo fractional derivative, with \(0<\alpha< 1\), is improved, which plays a central role in the synchronization analysis. Secondly, hybrid control strategies are designed via combing open loop control and adaptive control, and unknown control parameters are determined by the adaptive fractional updated laws to achieve global projective synchronization. In addition, applying the fractional Lyapunov approach and Mittag-Leffler function, the projective synchronization conditions are addressed in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) to ensure the synchronization. Finally, two examples are given to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.
Keywords
- neural networks
- fractional calculus
- Mittag-Leffler stability
- projective synchronization
- adaptive control law
1 Introduction
Fractional calculus dates from 300 years ago and deals with arbitrary (noninteger) order differentiation and integration. Although it has a long history, it did not draw much attention from researchers due to its complexity and difficult application. However, in the last decades, the theory of fractional calculus developed mainly as a pure theoretical field of mathematics and has been used in various fields as rheology, viscoelasticity, electrochemistry, diffusion processes, and so on; see, for instance, [1–7] and the references therein.
It is well known that compared with integer-order models, fractional-order calculus provides a more accurate instrument for the description of memory and hereditary properties of various processes. Taking these facts into account, the incorporation of the fractional-order calculus into a neural network model could better describe the dynamical behavior of the neurons, and many efforts have been made. In [8], a fractional-order cellular neural network model was firstly proposed by Arena et al., and chaotic behavior in noninteger-order cellular neural networks was discussed in [9]. In [10], the author pointed out a fractional-order three-cell network, which put forward limit cycles and stable orbits for different parameter values. Besides, it is important to point out that fractional-order neural networks are expected to play an important role in parameter estimation [11–13]. Therefore, as noted in [14], it is very significant and interesting to study fractional-order neural networks both in the area of theoretical research and in practical applications.
Recently, the dynamic analysis of fractional-order neural networks has received considerable attention, and some excellent results have been presented in [15–24]. Zhang et al. [15] discussed the chaotic behaviors in fractional-order three-dimensional Hopfield neural networks. Moreover, a fractional-order four-cell cellular neural network was presented, and its complex dynamical behavior was investigated using numerical simulations in [16]. Kaslik and Sivasundaram [17] considered nonlinear dynamics and chaos in fractional-order neural networks. Nowadays, there have been some advances in the stability analysis of fractional-order neural networks. The Mittag-Leffler stability and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order neural networks were investigated in [18–21]. The α-stability and α-synchronization of fractional-order neural networks were demonstrated in [22]. Yang et al. [23] discussed the finite-time stability analysis of fractional-order neural networks with delay. Kaslik and Sivasundaram [24] investigated the dynamics of fractional-order delay-free Hopfield fractional-order, including stability, multistability, bifurcations, and chaos. Stability analysis of fractional-order Hopfield neural networks with discontinuous activation functions was made in [25]. In [26] and [27], the global Mittag-Leffler stability and asymptotic stability were considered for fractional-order neural networks with delays and impulsive effects. The uniform stability issue was investigated in [28]. In addition, Wu et al. [29] discussed the global stability issue of the fractional-order interval projection neural network.
Since Pecora and Carroll [30] firstly put forward chaos synchronization in 1990, more and more researchers pay enough attention to studying synchronization. The increasing interest in researching synchronization stems from its potential applications in bioengineering [31], secure communication [32], and cryptography [33]. As we know, synchronization exists in various types, such as complete synchronization [34], anti-synchronization [35], lag synchronization [36], generalized synchronization [37], phase synchronization [38], projective synchronization [39–41], and so on. Among all kinds of synchronization, projective synchronization, characterized by a scaling factor that two systems synchronize proportionally, is one of the most interesting problems. Meanwhile, it can be used to extend binary digital to M-nary digital communication for achieving fast communication [42]. Very recently, some results with respect to synchronization of fractional-order neural networks have been proposed in [26, 43–49]. In [26], the complete synchronization of fractional-order chaotic neural networks was considered via nonimpulsive linear controller. Several results with respect to chaotic synchronization of fractional-order neural networks have been proposed in [43–45]. In addition, Wang et al. [46] investigated the projective cluster synchronization for the fractional-order coupled-delay complex network via adaptive pinning control. In [47], the global projective synchronization of fractional-order neural networks was discussed, and several control strategies were given to ensure the realization of complete synchronization, anti-synchronization, and stabilization of the addressed neural networks. Razminia et al. [48] considered the synchronization of fractional-order Rössler system via active control. By using the approach in [47], Bao and Cao [49] considered the projective synchronization of fractional-order memristor-based neural networks, and some sufficient criteria were derived to ensure the synchronization goal. However, most reports related to projective synchronization of neural networks system have utilized the direct Lyapunov method, which can be a bit complicated. We applied the Mittag-Leffler theory to achieve synchronization of fractional-order system. In addition, it should be pointed out that an LMI analysis technique was not applied to develop the synchronization criteria, and hence the above results have a certain degree of conservatism.
Motivated by the previous work, in this paper, our aim is to investigate the global Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization of fractional-order neural networks by using the LMI analysis approach. The main novelty of our contribution lies in three aspects: (1) a new differential inequality of the Caputo fractional derivatives of the quadratic form, with \(0<\alpha<1\), is established, which is applied to derive the synchronization conditions; (2) the hybrid control scheme is designed via combing open-loop control and adaptive control, and unknown control parameters are determined by the adaptive fractional updated laws; (3) by applying the Mittag-Leffler stability theorem in [50, 51], the global Mittag-Leffler synchronization conditions are presented in terms of LMIs to ensure the synchronization of fractional neural networks.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some definitions and a lemma are introduced, and a new differential inequality of the Caputo fractional derivatives of the quadratic form, with \(0<\alpha<1\), is presented. A model description is given in Section 3. Some sufficient conditions for Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization are derived in Section 4. Section 5 presents some numerical simulations. Some general conclusions are drawn in Section 6.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, some basic definitions and lemmas about fractional calculations are presented.
Definition 2.1
([52])
Definition 2.2
([52])
Lemma 2.1
([52])
Lemma 2.2
([47])
Aguila-Camacho et al. [53] established the fractional-order differential inequality \(\frac{1}{2}{}^{\mathrm{C}}_{t_{0}}D^{\alpha}_{t}x^{2}(t)\leq x(t){}^{\mathrm{C}}_{t_{0}}D^{\alpha}_{t}x(t)\) for the Caputo fractional derivative with \(0< \alpha< 1\). In Lemma 2.3, based on the proof line from [53], we make a generalization of this inequality. We prove that \(\frac{1}{2}D^{\alpha}x^{T}(t) P x(t)\leq x^{T}(t)PD^{\alpha}x(t)\) for all \(\alpha\in(0,1)\), where P is a positive definite matrix. Obviously, we can see that the differential inequality in Lemma 2.3 is more general.
Lemma 2.3
Proof
In order to ensure the completeness of the proof process, we recall some steps in the proof from Aguila-Camacho et al. [53]. We believe that this can make the proof easily understood for the readers.
Remark 2.1
3 Model description
Assumption 1
Definition 3.1
In what follows, we will design appropriate control schemes to derive the projective synchronization conditions between systems (10) and (11).
4 Main results
In this section, we resolve the problem of projective synchronization by converting the issue of projective synchronization into stability problem. More specially, the projective synchronization of systems (10) and (11) is equivalent to the stability of the error system (12). We will prove the stability of error system (12) with two different control schemes.
Remark 4.1
Note that the control scheme (13) is a hybrid control, \(v(t)\) is an open loop control, and \(w(t)\) is a linear control.
Theorem 4.1
Let Assumption 1 be satisfied. Suppose that there exists a positive definitive matrix P such that \(B=\frac{1}{2}(PC+C^{T}P^{T}-PAL-L^{T}A^{T}P^{T}+PK+K^{T}P^{T})>0\). Then systems (10) and (11) are globally Mittag-Leffler projective synchronized based on the control scheme (13).
Proof
Remark 4.2
Theorem 4.2
Let Assumption 1 be satisfied. Suppose that there exist a positive matrix P and adaptive constant matrix K such that \(\Omega=\frac{1}{2}(PC+C^{T}P^{T}-PAL-L^{T}A^{T}P^{T}+PK+K^{T}P^{T})>0\). Then systems (10) and (11) are projectively synchronized by the control scheme (16).
Proof
5 Illustrative examples
In this section, we give two examples to illustrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed theoretical results.
Example 1
In Figure 2, the projective synchronization error system converges to zero, which shows that the drive and response systems are globally asymptotically projectively synchronized.
Example 2
6 Conclusions
In this paper, the global Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization issue for fractional neural networks is investigated. A lemma about the Caputo fractional derivative of the quadratic form in the literature has been improved. Based on a hybrid control scheme, the Mittag-Leffler projective synchronization conditions have been presented in terms of LMIs, and hence the results obtained in this paper are easily checked and applied in practical engineering.
It would be interesting to extend the results proposed in this paper to fractional-order neural networks with delays. This issue will be the topic of our future research.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors are extremely grateful to the Associate Editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions, which helped to enrich the content and improve the presentation of this paper. This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61573306), the Postgraduate Innovation Project of Hebei Province of China (00302-6370019), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (A2011203103) and High level talent project of Hebei Province of China (C2015003054).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Hartley, T, Lorenzo, F: Chaos in fractional order Chua’s system. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 42, 485-490 (1995) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu, J, Chen, G: A note on the fractional order Chen system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 27, 685-688 (2006) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Deng, W, Li, C: Chaos synchronization of the fractional Lu system. Physica A 353, 61-72 (2005) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meral, F, Royston, T, Magin, R: Fractional calculus in viscoelasticity: an experimental study. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15, 939-945 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Boroomand, A, Menhaj, M: Fractional-order Hopfield neural networks. In: Koppen, M, Kasabov, N, Coghill, G (eds.) Advances in Neuro-Information Processing, pp. 883-890. Springer, Berlin (2009) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, W, Zhou, S, Li, H, Zhu, H: Chaos in a fractional-order Rössler system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 42, 1684-1691 (2009) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Chen, D, Wu, C, Herbert, H, Ma, X: Circuit simulation for synchronization of a fractional-order and integer-order chaotic system. Nonlinear Dyn. 73, 1671-1686 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caponetto, R, Fortuna, L, Porto, D: Bifurcation and chaos in noninteger order cellular neural networks. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 8, 1527-1539 (1998) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Arena, P, Fortuna, L, Porto, D: Chaotic behavior in noninteger-order cellular neural networks. Phys. Rev. E 61, 776-781 (2000) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petráš, I: A note on the fractional-order cellular neural networks. In: 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Canada, BC, Vancouver, Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre Hotel, July 16–21, pp. 1021-1024 (2006) Google Scholar
- Butzer, PL, Westphal, U: An Introduction to Fractional Calculus. World Scientific, Singapore (2000) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Beer, RD: Parameter space structure of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 18, 3009-3051 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Chon, KH, Hoyer, D, Armoundas, AA: Robust nonlinear autoregressive moving average model parameter estimation using stochastic recurrent artificial neural networks. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27, 538-547 (1999) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, R, Qi, D, Wang, Y: Dynamics analysis of fractional order three-dimensional Hopfield neural network. In: International Conference on Natural Computation, pp. 3037-3039 (2010) Google Scholar
- Huang, X, Zhao, Z, Wang, Z, Li, Y: Chaos and hyperchaos in fractional-order cellular neural networks. Neurocomputing 94, 13-21 (2012) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaslik, E, Sivasundaram, S: Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in fractional-order neural networks. Neural Netw. 32, 245-256 (2012) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ren, F, Cao, F, Cao, J: Mittag-Leffler stability and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order gene regulatory networks. Neurocomputing 160, 185-190 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, S, Yu, Y, Wang, H: Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional-order Hopfield neural networks. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 16, 104-121 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Chen, D, Zhang, R, Liu, X, Ma, X: Fractional order Lyapunov stability theorem and its applications in synchronization of complex dynamical networks. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 4105-4121 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, H, Yu, Y, Wen, G, Zhang, S, Yu, J: Global stability analysis of fractional-order Hopfield neural networks with time delay. Neurocomputing 154, 15-23 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu, J, Hu, C, Jiang, H: α-Stability and α-synchronization for fractional-order neural networks. Neural Netw. 35, 82-87 (2012) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang, X, Song, Q, Liu, Y, Zhao, Z: Finite-time stability analysis of fractional-order neural networks with delay. Neurocomputing 152, 19-26 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaslik, E, Sivasundaram, S: Dynamics of fractional-order neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 611-618 (2011) Google Scholar
- Zhang, S, Yu, Y, Wang, Q: Stability analysis of fractional-order Hopfield neural networks with discontinuous activation functions. Neurocomputing 171, 1075-1084 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stamova, I: Global Mittag-Leffler stability and synchronization of impulsive fractional-order neural networks with time-varying delays. Nonlinear Dyn. 77, 1251-1260 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Wang, F, Yang, Y, Hu, M: Asymptotic stability of delayed fractional-order neural networks with impulsive effects. Neurocomputing 154, 239-244 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen, L, Chai, Y, Wu, R, Ma, T, Zhai, H: Dynamic analysis of a class of fractional-order neural networks with delay. Neurocomputing 111, 190-194 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu, Z, Zou, Y, Huang, N: A system of fractional-order interval projection neural network. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 294, 389-402 (2016) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Pecora, L, Carroll, T: Synchronization in chaotic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821-824 (1990) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Magin, R: Fractional calculus in bioengineering, part 3. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 32, 195-377 (2004) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang, T, Chua, L: Impulsive stabilization of control and synchronization of chaotic systems: theory and application to secret communication. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl. 44, 976-988 (1997) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ojalvo, J, Roy, R: Spatiotemporal communication with synchronized optical chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5204-5207 (2001) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landsman, AS, Schwartz, IB: Complete chaotic synchronization in mutually coupled time-delay systems. Phys. Rev. E 75, 026201 (2007) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El-Dessoky, MM: Anti-synchronization of four scroll attractor with fully unknown parameters. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 11, 778-783 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhan, M, Wei, G, Lai, C: Transition from intermittency to periodicity in lag synchronization in coupled Rössler oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 65, 036202 (2002) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molaei, M, Umut, O: Generalized synchronization of nuclear spin generator system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 37, 227-232 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Rosenblum, MG, Pikovsky, AS, Kurths, J: Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804-1807 (1996) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, D, Xu, J: Projective synchronization of different chaotic time-delayed neural networks based on integral sliding mode controller. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 164-174 (2010) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Han, M, Zhang, M, Zhang, Y: Projective synchronization between two delayed networks of different sizes with nonidentical nodes and unknown parameters. Neurocomputing 171, 605-614 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gan, Q, Xu, R, Yang, P: Synchronization of non-identical chaotic delayed fuzzy cellular neural networks based on sliding mode control. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 433-443 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Mainieri, R, Rehacek, J: Projective synchronization in three dimensional chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3042-3045 (1999) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu, H, Zhou, S, Zhang, W: Chaos and synchronization of time-delayed fractional neuron network system. In: The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, pp. 2937-2941 (2008) Google Scholar
- Zhou, S, Li, H, Zhu, Z: Chaos control and synchronization in a fractional neuron network system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 36, 973-984 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhou, S, Lin, X, Zhang, L, Li, Y: Chaotic synchronization of a fractional neurons network system with two neurons. In: International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems, pp. 773-776 (2010) Google Scholar
- Wang, F, Yang, Y, Hu, M, Xu, X: Projective cluster synchronization of fractional-order coupled-delay complex network via adaptive pinning control. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 434, 134-143 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu, J, Hu, C, Jiang, H, Fan, X: Projective synchronization for fractional neural networks. Neural Netw. 49, 87-95 (2014) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Razminia, A, Majd, VJ, Baleanu, D: Chaotic incommensurate fractional order Rössler system: active control and synchronization. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2011, 15 (2011). doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2011-15 MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bao, H, Cao, J: Projective synchronization of fractional-order memristor-based neural networks. Neural Netw. 63, 1-9 (2015) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Sadati, SJ, Baleanu, D, Ranjbar, A, Ghaderi, R, Abdeljawad (Maraaba), T: Mittag-Leffler stability theorem for fractional nonlinear systems with delay. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2010, Article ID 108651 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Li, Y, Chen, Y, Podlubny, I: Stability of fractional-order nonlinear dynamic systems: Lyapunov direct method and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1810-1821 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Aguila-Camacho, N, Duare-Mermoud, MA, Gallegos, JA: Lyapunov functions for fractional order systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 2951-2957 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar