Discretization of forced Duffing system with fractionalorder damping
 Ahmed MA ElSayed^{1}Email author,
 Zaki FE ElRaheem^{2} and
 Sanaa M Salman^{2}
https://doi.org/10.1186/16871847201466
© ElSayed et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 20 November 2013
Accepted: 4 February 2014
Published: 14 February 2014
Abstract
In this paper we are interested in studying the effect of the fractionalorder damping in the forced Duffing oscillator before and after applying a discretization process to it. Fixed points and their stability are discussed for the discrete system obtained. Finally, numerical simulations using Matlab are carried out to investigate the dynamic behavior such as bifurcation, chaos, and chaotic attractors. We note that on increasing the value of the fractionalorder parameter, the resulting discrete system is stabilized.
Keywords
1 Introduction
In recent years differential equations with fractionalorder have attracted the attention of many researchers because of their applications in many areas of science and engineering. Analytical and numerical techniques have been implemented to study such equations. The fractional calculus has allowed the operations of integration and differentiation to be applied upon any fractionalorder. For the existence of solutions for fractional differential equations, see [1, 2].
As regards the development of existence theorems for fractional functionaldifferential equations, many contributions exist and can be referred to [3–5]. Many applications of fractional calculus amount to replacing the time derivative in a given evolution equation by a derivative of fractionalorder.
We recall the basic definitions (Caputo) and properties of fractionalorder differentiation and integration.
To solve fractionalorder differential equations there are two famous methods: frequency domain methods [6] and time domain methods [7]. In recent years it has been shown that the second method is more effective because the first method is not always reliable in detecting chaos [8] and [9].
Often it is not desirable to solve a differential equation analytically, and one turns to numerical or computational methods. In [10], a numerical method for nonlinear fractionalorder differential equations with constant or timevarying delay was devised. It should be noticed that the fractional differential equations tend to lower the dimensionality of the differential equations in question, however, introducing delay in differential equations makes it infinite dimensional. So, even a single ordinary differential equation with delay could display chaos.
A lot of differential equations with Caputo fractional derivative were simulated by the predictorcorrector scheme, such as the fractional Chua system, the fractional Chen system, the Lorenz system, and so on. We should note that the predictorcorrector method is an approximation for the fractionalorder integration, however, our approach is an approximation for the righthand side.
Indeed, fractionalorder systems are useful in studying the anomalous behavior of dynamical systems in electrochemistry, biology, viscoelasticity, and chaotic systems; see for example [11]. Dealing with fractionalorder differential equations as dynamical systems is somewhat new and has motivated the leading research literature recently; see for example [12–26]. The nonlocal property of fractional differential equations means that the next state of a system not only depends on its current state but also on its history states. This property is very closely resembling to the real world and thus fractional differential equations have become popular and have been applied to dynamical systems.
On the other hand, some examples of dynamical systems generated by piecewise constant arguments have been studied in [27–30]. Here we propose a discretization process to obtain the discrete version of the system under study. Meanwhile, we apply the discretization process to discretize the fractionalorder logistic differential equation.
2 Forced Duffing oscillator with fractionalorder damping
The Duffing oscillator is an example of a periodically forced oscillator with nonlinear elasticity. It is one of the prototype systems of nonlinear dynamics. It first became popular for studying harmonic oscillations and, later, chaotic nonlinear dynamics in the wake of early studies by the engineer Georg Duffing [31]. The system has been successfully used to model a variety of physical processes, such as stiffening springs, beam buckling, nonlinear electronic circuits, superconducting Josephson parametric amplifiers, and ionization waves in plasmas. Despite the simplicity of the Duffing oscillator, the dynamical behavior is extremely rich and research is still going on today [32].
Forced Duffing oscillators are much harder to analyze analytically, because of the periodic force involved. It is far better to use computer approximations of the system to analyze how the forced Duffing oscillator is behaving under certain conditions. The Duffing equation, a wellknown nonlinear differential equation, is used for describing many physical, engineering, and even biological problems [33].
where the constants μ, λ, b, and γ are the damping coefficient, linear stiffness, nonlinear stiffness, excitation amplitude, and excitation frequency, respectively. All previous constants, assumed to be positive except λ, can also be negative.
2.1 Bifurcation and chaos
3 Discretization process
In [35], a discretization process is introduced to discretize the fractionalorder differential equations and we take Riccati’s fractionalorder differential equations as an example. We notice that when the fractionalorder parameter $\alpha \to 1$, Euler’s discretization method is obtained. In [36], the same discretization method is applied to the logistic fractionalorder differential equation. We conclude that Euler’s method is able to discretize first order difference equations, however, we succeeded in discretizing a second order difference equation. Finally, in [37], we applied the same procedure to the fractionalorder Chua system to get the same results as in the two previous papers, and we showed that when $\alpha \to 1$ the system will be stabilized.
Here we are very interested in applying the dicretization method to a system of differential equations like the Chua system.
with initial conditions $x(0)=0$, $y(0)=0$, and $z(0)=0$.
Indeed, there are other discretization methods for discretizing fractionalorder differential equations, for example:

The GrünwaldLetnikov definition (GL) which is a generalization of the derivative. The idea behind is that h, the step size, should approach 0 as n approaches infinity.

The predictorcorrector method is an approximation for the fractionalorder integration.
As a matter of fact, our approach is an approximation for the righthand side.
4 Stability of fixed points
Now we study the asymptotic stability of the fixed points of the system (3.4) in the unforced case, that is, $sin(\mathrm{\Omega}t)=0$, which has three fixed point namely, ${\mathit{fix}}_{1}=(0,0,0)$, ${\mathit{fix}}_{2}=(\frac{\lambda}{b}i,0,0)$, and ${\mathit{fix}}_{3}=(\frac{\lambda}{b}i,0,0)$.
From the Jury test, if $P(1)>0$, $P(1)<0$, and ${a}_{3}<1$, ${b}_{3}>{b}_{1}$, ${c}_{3}>{c}_{2}$, where ${b}_{3}=1{a}_{3}^{2}$, ${b}_{2}={a}_{1}{a}_{3}{a}_{2}$, ${b}_{1}={a}_{2}{a}_{3}{a}_{1}$, ${c}_{3}={b}_{3}^{2}{b}_{1}^{2}$, and ${c}_{2}={b}_{3}{b}_{2}{b}_{1}{b}_{2}$, then the roots of $P(\mathrm{\Lambda})$ satisfy $\mathrm{\Lambda}<1$ and thus ${\mathit{fix}}_{1}$ is asymptotically stable. This is not satisfied here since ${a}_{3}>1$. That is, ${\mathit{fix}}_{1}$ is unstable.
We let ${a}_{11}=3$, ${a}_{22}=3+r\mu l$, and ${a}_{33}=(1+r\mu l+2sr\lambda l)$. From the Jury test, if $F(1)>0$, $F(1)<0$, and ${a}_{33}<1$, ${b}_{33}>{b}_{11}$, ${c}_{33}>{c}_{22}$, where ${b}_{33}=1{a}_{33}^{2}$, ${b}_{22}={a}_{11}{a}_{33}{a}_{22}$, ${b}_{11}={a}_{22}{a}_{33}{a}_{11}$, ${c}_{33}={b}_{33}^{2}{b}_{11}^{2}$, and ${c}_{22}={b}_{33}{b}_{22}{b}_{11}{b}_{22}$, then the roots of $F(\mathrm{\Lambda})$ satisfy $\mathrm{\Lambda}<1$ and thus ${\mathit{fix}}_{2}$ or ${\mathit{fix}}_{3}$ is asymptotically stable. We can check easily that $F(1)<0$, that is, both ${\mathit{fix}}_{2}$ and ${\mathit{fix}}_{3}$ are unstable.
5 Attractors, bifurcation, and chaos
Now vary the fractionalorder parameter α from 0.70 to 0.95, but with a fixed system parameter μ and change the parameter r from 0.15 to 0.30; the resulting bifurcation diagrams are shown in Figure 12(a)(d).
Then vary the fractionalorder parameter α from 0.85 to 0.95, but with a fixed system parameter $r=0.25$ and vary the parameter γ from 0 to 2; the resulting bifurcation diagrams are shown in Figure 12(a)(d).
6 Conclusion
A discretization method is applied in this paper to the forced Duffing oscillator with fractionalorder damping. The dynamics of the discretized fractionally damped Duffing equation has been examined numerically. Also, the conclusion of bifurcation of the parameterdependent system has been drawn numerically. Increasing the value of the fractionalorder damping term stabilizes the system under study in both cases: fractionalorder system and discretized system.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees of this manuscript for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 ElSayed A, ElMesiry A, ElSaka H: On the fractionalorder logistic equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 2007, 20: 817–823. 10.1016/j.aml.2006.08.013MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 ElSayed AMA: Nonlinear functionaldifferential equations of arbitrary orders. Nonlinear Anal. 1998, 33(2):181–186. 10.1016/S0362546X(97)005257MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Das S: Functional Fractional Calculus for System Identification and Controls. Springer, Berlin; 2007.Google Scholar
 Podlubny I Mathematics in Science and Engineering 198. In Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.Google Scholar
 Podlubny I: Geometric and physical interpretation of fractional integration and fractional differentiation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2002, 5(4):367–386. Dedicated to the 60th anniversary of Prof. Francesco MainardiMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Sun H, Abdelwahed A, Onaral B: Linear approximation for transfer function with a pole of fractionalorder. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1984, 29: 441–444. 10.1109/TAC.1984.1103551View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Diethelm K, Ford NJ, Freed AD: A predictorcorrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 2002, 29: 3–22. 10.1023/A:1016592219341MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Tavazoei MS, Haeri M: Unreliability of frequency domain approximation in recognizing chaos in fractionalorder systems. IET Signal Process. 2007, 1: 171–181. 10.1049/ietspr:20070053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Tavazoei MS, Haeri M: Limitation of frequency domain approximation for detecting chaos in fractionalorder systems. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2008, 69: 1299–1320. 10.1016/j.na.2007.06.030MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wang Z: A numerical method for delayed fractionalorder differential equations. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 256071Google Scholar
 Monje CA, Chen Y, Vinagre B, Xue D, Feliu V Advanced Industrial Control Series. In Fractional Order Systems and Controls: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, Berlin; 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Erjaee GH: On analytical justification of phase synchronization in different chaotic systems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 39(3):1195–1202. 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.006MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wu GC, Dumitru B: Discrete fractional logistic map and its chaos. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014, 75(1–2):283–287. 10.1007/s1107101310657View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wu GC, Dumitru B, Zeng SD: Discrete chaos in fractional sine and standard maps. Phys. Lett. A 2014. 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.12.010Google Scholar
 Faieghi M, Kuntanapreeda S, Delavari H, Baleanu D: LMIbased stabilization of a class of fractionalorder chaotic systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2013, 72(1–2):301–309. 10.1007/s1107101207146MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Yan JP, Li CP: On chaos synchronization of fractional differential equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2007, 32(2):725–735. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.062MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Fahd J, Thabet A, Dumitru B: Stability of q fractional nonautonomous systems. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2013, 14(1):780–784. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.08.001MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wu GC, Dumitru B: New applications of the variational iteration method  from differential equations to q fractional difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 21 10.1186/16871847201321Google Scholar
 Khalili GA, Moslemi YA, Dumitru B: On the fractional Hamilton and Lagrange mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2012, 51(9):2909–2916. 10.1007/s1077301211698View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Podlubny I: Numerical solution of ordinary fractional differential equations by the fractional difference method. In Advances in Difference Equations (Veszprém, 1995). Gordon & Breach, Amsterdam; 1997:507–515.Google Scholar
 Podlubny I: Matrix approach to discrete fractional calculus. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2000, 3(4):359–386.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Podlubny, I: The Laplace transform method for linear differential equations of fractionalorder.arXiv:functan/9710005 (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
 Sun K, Wang X, Sprott JC: Bifurcations and chaos in fractionalorder simplified Lorenz system. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2010, 20(4):1209–1219. 10.1142/S0218127410026411MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bhalekar S, DaftardarGejji V, Baleanu D, Magin R: Generalized fractionalorder Bloch equation with extended delay. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2012., 22(4): Article ID 1250071MATHGoogle Scholar
 Gejji VD, Bhalekar S, Gade P: Dynamics of fractionalorder Chen systems with delays. Pramana J. Phys. 2012, 79(1):61–69. 10.1007/s1204301202918View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chen YQ, Vinagre BM, Podlubny I: A new discretization method for fractionalorder differentiators via continued fraction expansion. 3. Proceedings of DETC 2003, 761–769.Google Scholar
 Akhmet MU: Stability of differential equations with piecewise constant arguments of generalized type. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68(4):794–803. 10.1016/j.na.2006.11.037MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Akhmet, MU, Altntana, D, Ergenc, T: Chaos of the logistic equation with piecewise constant arguments.arXiv:1006.4753 (2010)Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: Chaos and bifurcation of discontinuous dynamical systems with piecewise constant arguments. Malaya J. Mat. 2012, 1(1):14–18.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: Chaos and bifurcation of the logistic discontinuous dynamical systems with piecewise constant arguments. Malaya J. Mat. 2013, 3(1):14–20.Google Scholar
 Duffing G: Erzwungene Schwingung bei veränderlicher Eigenfrequenz und ihre technische Bedeutung. Vieweg, Braunschweig; 1918.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Korsch HJ, Jodl HJ: Chaos: A Program Collection for the PC. Springer, Berlin; 1999.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Moon FC: Chaotic Vibrations: An Introduction for Applied Scientists and Engineers. Wiley, New York; 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Petras I Nonlinear Physical Science. In FractionalOrder Nonlinear Systems: Modeling, Analysis and Simulation. Springer, Berlin; 2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: On a discretization process of fractionalorder Riccati differential equation. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 2013, 4(2):251–259.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM, ElRaheem ZF: On a discretization process of fractionalorder logistic differential equations. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2013. 10.1016/j.joems.2013.09.001Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Agarwal RP, Salman SM: Fractionalorder Chua’s system: discretization, bifurcation and chaos. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 320Google Scholar
 Elaidy SN Undergradute Texts in Mathematics. In An Introduction to Difference Equations. 3rd edition. Springer, New York; 2005.Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.