Skip to main content

Advertisement

On the oscillation and asymptotic behavior for a kind of fractional differential equations

Article metrics

  • 1644 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the oscillations of the fractional order differential equation D a α x(t)+q(t)f(x(t))=0, t[a,+), a>0, where q is a positive real-valued function and f is a continuous functional; D a α denotes the Riemann-Liouville differential operator of order α, 0<α1. We use the Riccati transformation technique to obtain some sufficient conditions which guarantee that every solution of the equation is oscillatory or the limit inferior converges to zero. Two examples are given to show the applications of our main results.

MSC:34A08, 34K11.

1 Introduction

The theory of fractional calculus goes back to Leibniz’s note in his list to L’Hospital [1], dated 30 September 1695, in which the meaning of the derivative of order 1/2 is discussed. After that in pure mathematics field the foundation of the fractional differential equations had been established. However, in recent years, many researchers found that the fractional differential equations are more accurate in describing some practical models, e.g. polymers. Today it has been used widely in physics, electrochemistry, control theory, and electromagnetic fields [27]. Furthermore, the fractional calculus can also provide an excellent instrument for the description of memory and hereditary properties of various materials and processes due to the existence of a ‘memory’ term in the model [813]. Since these studies there has been much research actively concerned with the fractional differential equations and many useful achievements have been obtained [1418].

From the 1960s, a lot of books and theses about the oscillatory behavior for first, second, and higher order differential equations are presented, see [1921]. The study of the oscillatory problem with a view on fractional differential equation is just being initiated. As a new cross-cutting area, recently some attention has been paid to oscillations of fractional differential equations [2229].

In 2012, Chen et al. [22] studied the oscillatory behavior of the following fractional differential equation:

[ r ( t ) ( D α y ) η ( t ) ] q(t)f ( t ( v t ) α y ( v ) d v ) =0for t>0,

where D α y denotes the Liouville right-sided fractional derivative of order α with the form

( D α y ) (t):= 1 Γ ( 1 α ) d d t t ( v t ) α y(v)dvfor t R + :=(0,).

By the Riccati transformation technique the authors obtained some sufficient conditions, which guarantee that every solution of the equation is oscillatory.

Using the same method, in 2013, Chen [23] studied oscillatory behavior of the fractional differential equation of the form

( D 1 + α y ) (t)p(t) ( D α y ) (t)+q(t)f ( t ( v t ) α y ( v ) d v ) =0for t>0,

where D α y is the Liouville right-sided fractional derivative of order α(0,1) of y.

Zhang [24] considered the oscillation of the nonlinear fractional differential equation with damping term,

[ a ( t ) ( D α x ( t ) ) γ ] +p(t) ( D α x ( t ) ) γ q(t)f ( t ( ξ t ) α x ( ξ ) d ξ ) =0,t[ t 0 ,),

where D α x(t) denotes the Liouville right-sided fractional derivative of order α of x. Using a generalized Riccati function and the inequality technique, he established some new oscillation criteria.

Han et al. [25] considered the oscillation for a class of fractional differential equations,

[ r ( t ) g ( ( D α y ) ( t ) ) ] p(t)f ( t ( s t ) α y ( s ) d s ) =0for t>0,

where 0<α<1 is a real number, D α y is the Liouville right-sided fractional derivative of order α of y. By a generalized Riccati transformation technique, oscillation criteria for the nonlinear fractional differential equation are obtained.

Qi and Huang [26] studied the oscillation behavior of the equation of the form

( a ( t ) [ r ( t ) D α x ( t ) ] ) +p(t) [ r ( t ) D α x ( t ) ] q(t) t ( ξ t ) α x(ξ)dξ=0,t[ t 0 ,),

where D α x(t) also denotes the Liouville right-sided fractional derivative and some sufficient conditions for the oscillation of the equation have been given.

The above works on the oscillation are all concerned with fractional equations with Liouville right-sided fractional derivative by the Riccati transformation technique.

We notice that very little attention is paid to oscillations of fractional differential equations with a Riemann-Liouville derivative. For work studying the oscillatory behavior of fractional differential equations with the Riemann-Liouville derivative we refer to [27, 28], and [29].

In 2012, Grace et al. [27] studied the oscillation theory for fractional differential equations by considering equations of the form

D a q x+ f 1 (t,x)=v(t)+ f 2 (t,x), lim t a + J a 1 q x(t)= b 1 ,

under the conditions

x f i (t,x)>0for i=1,2,x0 and ta

and

| f 1 (t,x)|> p 1 (t) | x | β and| f 2 (t,x)|> p 2 (t) | x | γ for x0 and ta,

where D a q denotes the Riemann-Liouville differential operator of order q with 0<q1, and the operator J a p is the Rieman-Liouville fractional integral operator. The authors obtained some new oscillation criteria by reducing the fractional differential equation to the equivalent Volterra fractional integral equation and by applying the inequality technique.

Marian [28] presented the oscillatory behavior of forced nonlinear fractional difference equations of the form

Δ α x(t)+ f 1 ( t , x ( t + α ) ) =v(t)+ f 2 ( t , x ( t + α ) ) ,t N 0 ,0<α1, Δ α 1 x(t) | t = 0 = x 0 ,

where Δ α is a Riemann-Liouville like discrete fractional difference operator of order α, and some oscillation criteria are established by the same method in [27].

In 2013, Chen et al. [29] improved and extended some work in [27] by considering the forced oscillation of the fractional differential equation

D a q x+ f 1 (t,x)=v(t)+ f 2 (t,x), lim t a + J a 1 q x(t)= b 1 ,

with the conditions

D a q k x(a)= b k (k=1,2,,m1)

and

lim t a + I a m q x(t)= b m ,

where D a q denotes the Riemann-Liouville or Caputo differential operator of order q with m1<qm, m1, and the operator I a m q is the Rieman-Liouville fractional integral operator. The authors obtained some new oscillation criteria by the same method as [27].

Motivated by above work, in this paper we will extend some oscillation results from integer differential equations to the fractional differential equation

D a α x(t)+q(t)f ( x ( t ) ) =0,t[a,+),a>0,
(1.1)

where D a α denotes the standard Riemann-Liouville differential operator of order α with 0<α1, q is a positive real-valued function, f is a continuous functional defined on [0,+)[0,+) satisfying

f ( x ) I 2 α x K>0,
(1.2)

and I 2 α denotes the Riemann-Liouville integral operator.

We will use the method of the Riccati transformation technique to study the oscillatory behavior of the fractional differential equation (1.1). To the best of our knowledge, there is not any result on the oscillation of the fractional differential equation involving the Riemann-Liouville derivative by the method of the Riccati transformation technique.

A solution of (1.1) is said to be oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on [a,+) and otherwise it is non-oscillatory. An equation is said to be oscillatory if all its solutions are oscillatory.

The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we present some basic definitions of the fractional differential and integral operators, and provide some necessary lemmas. In Section 3, we mainly use the Riccati transformation technique to get some sufficient conditions which guarantee that every solution of (1.1) is oscillatory or the limit inferior converges to zero. Our results are essential new. Finally we provide some examples to show applications of our criteria.

2 Some preliminary lemmas

The operator D a α with 0<α<1 defined by

D a α x(t)= 1 Γ ( 1 α ) d d t a t ( t s ) α x(s)ds
(2.1)

is called the Riemann-Liouville derivative operator. The operator I a α defined by

I a α x(t)= 1 Γ ( α ) a t ( t s ) α 1 x(s)ds
(2.2)

is called the Riemann-Liouville integral operator. Using the integral operator I a α we can define D a α as

D a α x(t):= d d t I a 1 α x(t).
(2.3)

In general, if n1 is an integer and n1<αn, then

D a α x(t):= d n d t n I a n α x(t).
(2.4)

The integral operator has the following properties, which will be used in the next lemma:

(i) I a α I a β f(t)= I a α + β f(t), D a α I a α f(t)=f(t),α>0,β>0,fL(0,1);
(2.5)
(ii)Γ(z+1)=zΓ(z).
(2.6)

The Riemann-Liouville integral operator also has a general relationship between I a 2 α and I a 1 α like

( I a 2 α x ( t ) ) = ( 1 Γ ( 2 α ) a t ( t s ) 1 α x ( s ) d s ) = 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) a t ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( 2 α ) ( t t ) 1 α x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) a t ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s = ( I a 1 α x ) ( t ) .

Lemma 2.1 [3]

Let α>0. Assume for x: D 0 + α xL(0,1). Then the following equality holds:

I 0 + α D 0 + α x(t)=x(t)+ c 1 t α 1 + c 2 t α 2 ++ c n t α n

for some c i R, i=1,2,,n, where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

For more details on the Riemann-Liouville type fractional operators, see for example [27].

Before stating our main results, we begin with the following lemmas which are crucial in the proofs of the main results.

Lemma 2.2 Suppose that x is an eventually positive solution of (1.1) and

lim inf t x(t)=l0.
(2.7)

Then there is a sufficiently large t 2 [a,+) such that

I a 1 α x(t)>0for t[ t 2 ,+).

Proof Let x be an eventually positive solution of (1.1), which means that there exists a t 0 [a,+) such that x(t)>0 for t[ t 0 ,+).

From the condition (2.7) we can find a t 1 > t 0 and a constant l with 0< l <l such that x(t)> l for t[ t 1 ,+). So we can divide I a 1 α x into three parts

I a 1 α x = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) a t 1 ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) a t 0 1 ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( 1 α ) t 0 t 1 1 ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( 1 α ) t 1 t 1 ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s .

From Lemma 2.1 we know that if D a α x(t) exists, and this means ( t s ) α x(s)L[a,t] for any t[a,+), especially ( t 0 s ) α x(s)L[a, t 0 ].

Also we get | ( t 0 s ) α x(s)|L[a, t 0 ]. Therefore we can take M= 1 Γ ( 1 α ) a t 0 | 1 ( t s ) α x(s)|ds. Then we have

I a 1 α x M + 1 Γ ( 1 α ) t 0 t 1 1 ( t s ) α x ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( 1 α ) t 1 t 1 ( t s ) α l d s M + l ( t t 1 ) 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) .

Obviously there exists a sufficient large t 2 [ t 1 ,+) such that l ( t t 1 ) 1 α Γ ( 2 α ) >M. So I a 1 α x(t)>0 for t[ t 2 ,+). The proof is complete. □

Lemma 2.3 [30]

If X and Y are nonnegative, then

X λ λX Y λ 1 +(λ1) Y λ 0,when λ>1
(2.8)

and

X λ λX Y λ 1 (1λ) Y λ 0,when 0<λ<1,
(2.9)

where equality holds if and only if X=Y.

3 Main results

Theorem 3.1 If there exists a positive function σ C 1 (0,+) and a sufficiently large t 2 a such that

lim sup t t 2 t [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] ds=,
(3.1)

where σ + (s):=max{ σ (s),0}, then every solution x of (1.1) is oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Proof Assume to the contrary that there exists a non-oscillatory solution x of (1.1). Without loss of generality, we only consider the case when x(t) is eventually positive, since the case when x(t) is eventually negative is similar. Thus there exists t 0 (a,+) such that x(t)>0 for t[ t 0 ,+). Next we define the ‘Riccati’ type function w by

w(t)=σ(t) I a 1 α x ( t ) I a 2 α x ( t ) .
(3.2)

If lim inf t x(t)0, from Lemma 2.2, there exists a t 1 [a,+) such that I a 1 α x(t)>0 for t> t 1 . Furthermore, using the same measure in Lemma 2.2, we can easily obtain the result that there exists a t 2 [a,+) such that I a 2 α x(t)>0 for t> t 2 . So we get w(t)>0 for t[ t 2 ,+).

Now differentiating w(t) on [ t 2 ,) we have

w ( t ) = σ ( t ) I a 1 α x ( t ) I a 2 α x ( t ) + σ ( t ) ( I a 1 α x ( t ) I a 2 α x ( t ) ) = σ ( t ) σ ( t ) w ( t ) + σ ( t ) I a 2 α x ( t ) ( I a 1 α x ( t ) ) ( I a 2 α x ( t ) ) 2 σ ( t ) I a 1 α x ( t ) ( I a 2 α x ( t ) ) ( I a 2 α x ( t ) ) 2 = σ ( t ) σ ( t ) w ( t ) + σ ( t ) D a α x ( t ) I a 2 α x ( t ) σ ( t ) ( I a 1 α x ( t ) ) 2 ( I a 2 α x ( t ) ) 2 = σ ( t ) σ ( t ) w ( t ) σ ( t ) q ( t ) f ( x ( t ) ) I a 2 α x ( t ) w 2 ( t ) σ ( t ) .

Then using condition (1.2) we get the inequality

w (t) σ + ( t ) σ ( t ) w(t)Kσ(t)q(t) w 2 ( t ) σ ( t ) .
(3.3)

Now taking

λ=2,X= 1 σ 1 2 ( t ) w(t),Y= σ + ( t ) 2 σ 1 2 ( t ) ,

and using Lemma 2.3 and (3.3) we conclude that

w (t)Kσ(t)q(t)+ ( σ + ( t ) ) 2 4 σ ( t ) .

Integrating both sides from t 2 to t, and letting t+, we have

t 2 t [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] dsw( t 2 )w(t)<w( t 2 ).

So

lim sup t t 2 t [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] dsw( t 2 )<+,

which is a contradiction to the condition (3.1) and the proof is complete. □

Corollary 3.1 Assume that (1.2) hold, and there exists a sufficient large t 2 such that

lim sup t t 2 t [ K s q ( s ) 1 4 s ] ds=.
(3.4)

Then every solution x of (1.1) is either oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Proof This follows from Theorem 3.1 by taking σ(t)=t. □

Corollary 3.2 Assume that (1.2) hold, and there exists a sufficiently large t 2 such that

lim sup t t 2 t q(s)ds=.
(3.5)

Then every solution x of (1.1) is either oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Proof Taking σ(t)=1, then the condition (3.1) in Theorem 3.1 is reduced to (3.5). Hence the result is obtained from Theorem 3.1. □

Theorem 3.2 Assume that (1.2) holds. Also, assume that there exist functions HC(D, R + ), σ C 1 (0,+) such that

H(t,t)=0andH(t,s)>0for t>sa,

where D={(t,s) R 2 :tsa} and H has a nonpositive continuous partial derivative H s (t,s):= H ( t , s ) s on D with respect to the second variable. Also assume there exists a nonnegative continuous function h defined on D and a differentiable positive function σ(t) satisfying for all t[a,+)

σ + ( s ) σ ( s ) H(t,s)+ H s (t,s)= 1 σ ( s ) h(t,s) H 1 2 (t,s),
(3.6)

where σ + (s):=max{ σ (s),0}. If these assumptions hold and

lim sup t 1 H ( t , t 1 ) t 1 t [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) H ( t , s ) h 2 ( t , s ) 4 σ ( s ) ] ds=,
(3.7)

then every solution x of (1.1) is oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Proof Suppose x is a non-oscillatory solution of (1.1). We only consider the case that x(t) is eventually positive, since the case that x(t) is eventually negative is similar. Assume that x(t)>0 for all t t 1 with large enough t 1 .

If lim inf t x(t)0, we proceed as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 to see that (3.3) holds. Multiplying each side of (3.3) by H(t,s) and integrating from t 1 to t, we obtain

t 1 t K σ ( s ) q ( s ) H ( t , s ) d s t 1 t H ( t , s ) w ( s ) d s + t 1 t H ( t , s ) σ + ( s ) σ ( s ) w ( s ) d s t 1 t H ( t , s ) 1 σ ( s ) w 2 ( s ) d s .
(3.8)

Then using the integration by parts formula and from (3.6), (3.8) we have

t 1 t K σ ( s ) q ( s ) H ( t , s ) d s H ( t , t 1 ) w ( t 1 ) + t 1 t H s ( t , s ) w ( s ) d s + t 1 t H ( t , s ) σ + ( s ) σ ( s ) w ( s ) d s t 1 t H ( t , s ) 1 σ ( s ) w 2 ( s ) d s H ( t , t 1 ) w ( t 1 ) + t 1 t { [ H s ( t , s ) + H ( t , s ) σ + ( s ) σ ( s ) ] w ( s ) H ( t , s ) 1 σ ( s ) w 2 ( s ) } d s = H ( t , t 1 ) w ( t 1 ) + t 1 t { [ 1 σ ( s ) h ( t , s ) H 1 2 ( t , s ) ] w ( s ) H ( t , s ) 1 σ ( s ) w 2 ( s ) } d s .
(3.9)

Taking

λ=2,X= ( H ( t , s ) 1 σ ( s ) ) 1 2 w(s),Y= h ( t , s ) H 1 2 ( t , s ) 2 H 1 2 ( t , s ) = h ( t , s ) 2 ,

and using Lemma 2.3 we get

t 1 t Kσ(s)q(s)H(t,s)dsH(t, t 1 )w( t 1 )+ t 1 t h 2 ( t , s ) 4 σ ( s ) ds.

Therefore

1 H ( t , t 1 ) t 1 t { K σ ( s ) q ( s ) H ( t , s ) h 2 ( t , s ) 4 σ ( s ) } dsw( t 1 )<+,

which contradicts (3.7). The proof is complete. □

Theorem 3.3 Assume that (1.2) holds. Furthermore assume there is a positive function σ(t) such that σ (t) is continuous on (0,+) and a sufficiently large t 1 satisfies

lim sup t 1 t m t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] ds=,
(3.10)

where m>1. Then every solution of (1.1) is either oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Proof Suppose x is a non-oscillatory solution of (1.1). We only consider the case that x(t) is eventually positive, since the case that x(t) is eventually negative is similar. Assume that x(t)>0 for all t t 1 where t 1 is chosen large. If lim inf t x(t)0, proceeding as in Theorem 3.1, we get

w (t)Kσ(t)q(t)+ ( σ + ( t ) ) 2 4 σ ( t ) .

Therefore,

t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] ds t 1 t ( t s ) m w (s)ds.
(3.11)

Using the integration by parts formula leads to

t 1 t ( t s ) m w ( s ) d s = ( t s ) m w ( s ) | s = t 1 s = t + t 1 t m ( t s ) m 1 w ( s ) d s = ( t t 1 ) m w ( t 1 ) + t 1 t m ( t s ) m 1 w ( s ) d s ( t t 1 ) m w ( t 1 ) .
(3.12)

Then from (3.11) we have

t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] ds ( t t 1 ) m w( t 1 ),

and so

1 t m t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] ds ( t t 1 t ) m w( t 1 ).

Hence,

lim sup t 1 t m t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] dsw( t 1 ),

which is a contradiction of (3.10). So the proof is complete. □

4 Examples

In this section, we will show applications of our main results.

Example 4.1 Consider the fractional differential equation

D a α x(t)+ 1 t a t 1 Γ ( 2 α ) ( t s ) 1 α x(s)ds=0,t>a>0,
(4.1)

where α(0,1), D a α is the Riemann-Liouville differential operator. In (4.1), q(t)= 1 t , f(x(t))= a t 1 Γ ( 2 α ) ( t s ) 1 α x(s)ds. Set K=1. Then f ( x ) I 2 α x K>0. Taking σ(s)=s, we obtain

lim sup t t 1 t [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] d s = lim sup t t 1 t [ s 1 4 s ] d s = ,

which implies that all conditions in Theorem 3.1 hold. So by Theorem 3.1 every solution of (4.1) is oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

Example 4.2 Consider the fractional differential equation

D a α x(t)+ e t a t 1 Γ ( 2 α ) ( t s ) 1 α x(s)ds=0,t>a,
(4.2)

where α(0,1), D a α is the Riemann-Liouville differential operator. In (4.2), q(t)= e t , f(x(t))= a t 1 Γ ( 2 α ) ( t s ) 1 α x(s)ds. Set K=1. Then f ( x ) I 2 α x K>0. Taking σ(s)=1, and m=2 we obtain

lim sup t 1 t m t 1 t ( t s ) m [ K σ ( s ) q ( s ) ( σ + ( s ) ) 2 4 σ ( s ) ] d s = lim sup t 1 t 2 t 1 t ( t s ) 2 e s d s = lim sup t 1 t 2 [ ( t s ) 2 e s | t 1 t + t 1 t 2 ( t s ) e s d s ] = lim sup t 1 t 2 [ ( t t 1 ) 2 e t 1 + 2 ( t s ) e s | t 1 t + 2 e s | t 1 t ] = lim sup t 1 t 2 [ ( t t 1 ) 2 e t 1 2 ( t t 1 ) e t 1 + 2 e t 2 e t 1 ] = ,

which yields the result that all conditions on Theorem 3.3 hold. Therefore, by Theorem 3.3 every solution of (4.2) is oscillatory or lim inf t x(t)=0.

References

  1. 1.

    Leibniz GW: Mathematische Schriften. Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, Hildesheim; 1962.

  2. 2.

    Diethelm K: The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin; 2010.

  3. 3.

    Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.

  4. 4.

    Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.

  5. 5.

    Das S: Functional Fractional Calculus for System Identification and Controls. Springer, New York; 2008.

  6. 6.

    Oldham KB, Spanier J: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, San Diego; 1974.

  7. 7.

    Miller KS, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, New York; 1993.

  8. 8.

    Metzler R, Schick S, Kilian HG, Nonnenmacher TF: Relaxation in filled polymers: a fractional calculus approach. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103: 7180-7186. 10.1063/1.470346

  9. 9.

    Glöckle WG, Nonnenmacher TF: A fractional calculus approach to self similar protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 1995, 68: 46-53. 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8

  10. 10.

    Diethelm K, Freed AD: Fractional calculus in biomechanics: a 3D viscoelastic model using regularized fractional-derivative kernels with application to the human calcaneal fat pad. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2006, 5: 203-215. 10.1007/s10237-005-0011-0

  11. 11.

    Hilfer R: Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, River Edge; 2000.

  12. 12.

    Magin RL: Fractional calculus in bioengineering. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 32: 1-377. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v32.10

  13. 13.

    Baillie RT: Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. J. Econ. 1996, 73: 5-59. 10.1016/0304-4076(95)01732-1

  14. 14.

    Diethelm K, Ford NJ: Analysis of fractional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 265: 229-248. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7194

  15. 15.

    Cabada A, Wang GT: Positive solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations with integral boundary value conditions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 389: 403-411. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.11.065

  16. 16.

    Sun S, Zhao Y, Han Z, Li Y: The existence of solutions for boundary value problem of fractional hybrid differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17: 4961-4967. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.001

  17. 17.

    Galeone L, Garrappa R: Explicit methods for fractional differential equations and their stability properties. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 288: 548-560.

  18. 18.

    Zhang X, Liu L, Wu Y: Multiple positive solutions of a singular fractional differential equation with negatively perturbed term. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55: 1263-1274. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.006

  19. 19.

    Han Z, Sun S, Shi B: Oscillation criteria for a class of second order Emden-Fowler delay dynamic equations on time scales. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 334: 847-858. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.004

  20. 20.

    Bohner M, Erbe L, Peterson A: Oscillation for nonlinear second order dynamic equations on a time scale. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 301: 491-507. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.07.038

  21. 21.

    Erbe L, Peterson A: Boundedness and oscillation for nonlinear dynamic equations on a time scale. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 735-744. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07061-8

  22. 22.

    Chen D: Oscillation criteria of fractional differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012., 2012: Article ID 33

  23. 23.

    Chen D: Oscillatory behavior of a class of fractional differential equations with damping. Univ. Politeh. Bucharest Sci. Bull. 2013, 75: 107-118.

  24. 24.

    Zheng B: Oscillation for a class of nonlinear fractional differential equations with damping term. J. Adv. Math. Stud. 2013, 6: 107-115.

  25. 25.

    Han Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Zhang C: Oscillation for a class of fractional differential equation. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2013., 2013: Article ID 390282

  26. 26.

    Qi C, Huang S: Interval oscillation criteria for a class of fractional differential equations with damping term. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013., 2013: Article ID 301085 10.1155/2013/301085

  27. 27.

    Grace SR, Agarwal RP, Wong JY, Zafer A: On the oscillation of fractional differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2012, 15: 222-231.

  28. 28.

    Marian SL: Oscillation of fractional nonlinear difference equations. Math. Æterna 2012, 2: 805-813.

  29. 29.

    Chen D, Qu P, Lan Y: Forced oscillation of certain fractional differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 125

  30. 30.

    Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1959.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (61374074), Natural Science Outstanding Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201119) and supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2012AM009, ZR2013AL003), also supported by Natural Science Foundation of Educational Department of Shandong Province (J11LA01).

Author information

Correspondence to Zhenlai Han.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Han, Z., Zhao, P. et al. On the oscillation and asymptotic behavior for a kind of fractional differential equations. Adv Differ Equ 2014, 50 (2014) doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2014-50

Download citation

Keywords

  • oscillation
  • fractional differential equation
  • Riemann-Liouville differential operator