# Dynamical behaviors of a discrete SIS epidemic model with standard incidence and stage structure

- Zhidong Teng
^{1}, - Linfei Nie
^{1}Email author and - Jiabo Xu
^{1}

**2013**:87

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-87

© Teng et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

**Received: **30 September 2012

**Accepted: **15 March 2013

**Published: **3 April 2013

## Abstract

A discrete SIS epidemic model with stage structure and standard incident rate which is governed by Beverton-Holt type is studied. The sufficient conditions on the permanence and extinction of disease are established. The existence of the endemic equilibrium is obtained. Further, by using the method of linearization, the local asymptotical stability of the endemic equilibrium is also studied. Lastly, the examples and numerical simulations carried out to illustrate the feasibility of the main results and revealed the far richer dynamical behaviors of the discrete epidemic model compared with the corresponding continuous epidemic models.

**MSC:**39A30, 92D30.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction

Epidemics play an important role in the development and survival of human species. Recently, mathematical epidemic models in discrete time have been established to describe the dynamical evolution of epidemics. For example, in [1], Castillo-Chavez and Yakubu proposed a discrete SIS epidemic model and investigated its complex dynamics. In [2], some SI, SIR and SIS type epidemic models in discrete time are studied by Allen. In addition, many other results on the discrete time epidemic dynamical models can be seen in [3–16].

In the standard SIS model, the incidence rate is bilinear and is given by $\beta IS$, where *I* and *S* are respectively the numbers of infective and susceptible individuals per unit area and *β* is the transmission rate. When *N*, the number of humans per unit area, is large, the adequate contact rate *βN* which proportionates to *N* is unreasonable, because the number of infected individuals which a susceptible individual contacts is limited. Anderson and May in [17] point out that standard incidence $\beta IS/N$ are more reasonable than bilinear incidence. Capasso and Serio in [18] introduced a saturated incidence rate $g(I)=kI/(1+\alpha I)$ into epidemic models in studying the cholera spread in Bari in Italy, where *k* and *α* are positive constants. The general incidence rate $g(I)=k{I}^{q}/(1+\alpha {I}^{p})$ was proposed by Liu, Levin and Iwasa in [19]; here, *q* and *p* are positive integers.

It is well known that many kinds of diseases, such as AIDS, SARS and tuberculosis, more easily spread among mature individuals. Thus, it is meaningful to consider models with stage structure. Stage structures were introduced in some continuous models (see, *e.g.*, Xiao and Chen [20] and the references cited therein). However, up to now, there have been few results about discrete epidemic models with stage structure. In [3], a discrete epidemic model with stage structure governed by bilinear incidence are studied by Li and Wang. In this paper, we will investigate a discrete epidemic model with standard incidence and with disease that spreads only among mature individuals.

According to the transmission mechanism of some diseases, the population is divided into three classes: immature individuals, susceptible mature individuals and infectious mature individuals. We denote that $J(n)$ is the density of immature individuals, $S(n)$ is the density of the mature individuals, $I(n)$ is the density of infectious individuals and $N(n)=J(n)+S(n)+I(n)$ is the density of the total population. We assume that the susceptible individual becomes infectious after contact with infective individuals, and recovery from disease does not give permanent immunity. Furthermore, we suppose that the infective individual and the immature individuals have no ability to breed, which is reasonable, for example, women who are infected with gonorrhea cannot give birth to babies. Meanwhile, we suppose that the recruitment rate is governed by the Beverton-Holt type, that is, $\xi S(n)/(1+\beta N(n))$ and that susceptible individuals are infected with probability $\alpha I(n)/N(n)$.

where *ξ* and *β* are positive constants, ${r}_{1}$ is the survival rate of immature individuals, ${r}_{2}$ is the survival rate of mature individuals, ${r}_{3}$ is the survival rate of infected individuals, *c* is the rate of immature individuals becoming mature individuals and *σ* is the susceptible individuals that recover with probability.

For an epidemic model, it is well known that we are concerned about that whether the disease will invade the population. Thus, it is important to research the permanence and extinction of the disease. Therefore, in this paper, we firstly will establish the sufficient conditions, which ensure the disease in model (1) is permanent or extinct, respectively. Next, by using the Horn fixed-point theorem and the method of linearization, we will study the existence and local asymptotical stability of the endemic equilibrium for model (1). Further, for a discrete epidemic model, its dynamical behaviors may be very complicated which can be seen in some examples and numerical simulations in model (1).

The organization of this paper is as follows. In the next section, we will introduce the basic assumptions for model (1). Next, we will consider an auxiliary system, which includes a variable parameter (see model (7) in the next section). We will establish the sufficient conditions which ensure the global asymptotical stability of positive equilibrium of the auxiliary system. From this, we will further obtain the global asymptotical stability of positive equilibrium of the disease-free subsystem of model (1) (see model (3) in the next section). Further, we will consider the general autonomous difference equation (see model (9) in the next section). We will prove that if all solutions of the equation are ultimately bounded then it has at least an equilibrium. In Section 3, the sufficient conditions are established to ensure the permanence or extinction of the disease in model (1). Further, the existence and local asymptotical stability of endemic equilibrium are obtained in Section 4. In Section 5, some examples and numerical simulations are given to illustrate the feasibility of the main results. In Section 6, a brief discussion and some open problems are given.

## 2 Preliminaries

Let *Z* denote the set of all nonnegative integers. In this paper, for model (1) we first introduce the following assumptions:

(H_{1}) $0<c<1$, $0<\alpha <1$, $0<\sigma <1$, $0<{r}_{i}<1$ ($i=1,2,3$).

(H_{2}) $\xi +R>1$, where $R=max\{{r}_{1},{r}_{2},{r}_{3}\}$.

(H_{3}) ${r}_{1}-{r}_{1}c-\xi /4>0$.

**Lemma 2.1** *Assume that* (H_{1}) *holds*. *Then* ${R}_{+}^{3}$ *is the invariable set of model* (1), *that is*, *any solution* $(J(n),S(n),I(n))$ *of model* (1) *with initial condition* (2) *is positive for any* $n\in Z$.

Therefore, we finally have that if ${A}^{\ast}\le 1$, then model (3) has only an equilibrium ${E}_{0}(0,0)$ and if ${A}^{\ast}>1$, then model (3) has two equilibria ${E}_{0}(0,0)$ and ${E}^{\ast}({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$.

Corresponding to ${E}^{\ast}({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$, we see that model (1) has a disease-free equilibrium $({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast},0)$. Further, we introduce the following assumption:

_{4})

*ρ*is a nonnegative parameter. Let

We have the following result.

**Lemma 2.2**

*Assume that*(H

_{1})

*to*(H

_{4})

*hold and*${B}^{\ast}>1$.

*Then there exists a positive constant*$\delta >0$

*such that model*(7)

*has a globally uniformly asymptotically stable positive equilibrium*${E}_{\rho}^{\ast}({J}_{\rho}^{\ast},{S}_{\rho}^{\ast})$

*for any*$\rho \in [0,\delta )$.

*Furthermore*,

*Proof*To obtain equilibria of model (7), we first consider the following equations:

_{4}), by using the existence theorem of implicit function, there exists an open subset ${I}_{1}\times {I}_{2}$ including $(0,{J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$ in ${R}_{+}\times {R}_{+}^{2}$ such that for every

*ρ*in ${I}_{1}$, there exists a unique $({J}_{\rho},{S}_{\rho})$ in ${I}_{2}$ such that $F(\rho ,{J}_{\rho},{S}_{\rho})=0$, $G(\rho ,{J}_{\rho},{S}_{\rho})=0$ and $({J}_{0},{S}_{0})=({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$. Furthermore, ${J}_{\rho}$ and ${S}_{\rho}$ are continuously differentiable with respect to

*ρ*. This shows that there exists a positive constant ${\delta}_{1}>0$ with ${\delta}_{1}<1$ such that when $\rho \in [0,{\delta}_{1})$, model (7) has an equilibrium ${E}_{\rho}^{\ast}({J}_{\rho}^{\ast},{S}_{\rho}^{\ast})$ and

it follows from (H_{1}) to (H_{3}) that for any $\rho \in (0,{\delta}_{1})$, matrix ${\mathrm{\Delta}}_{\rho}$ is positive, that is, all elements of ${\mathrm{\Delta}}_{\rho}$ are positive.

Similarly, owing to the positivity of matrix ${\mathrm{\Delta}}_{\rho}$, we obtain ${J}_{\rho}(n+1)<{J}_{\rho}(n)$ and ${S}_{\rho}(n+1)<{S}_{\rho}(n)$ for all $n\in Z$. This shows that solution $({J}_{\rho}(n),{S}_{\rho}(n))$ of model (7) is decreasing with respect to $n\in Z$. Therefore, we finally also have ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}({J}_{\rho}(n),{S}_{\rho}(n))={E}_{\rho}^{\ast}({J}_{\rho}^{\ast},{S}_{\rho}^{\ast})$.

respectively, such that ${\overline{J}}_{\rho}(0)<{J}_{\rho}(0)<{\stackrel{\u02c6}{J}}_{\rho}(0)$ and ${\overline{S}}_{\rho}(0)<{S}_{\rho}(0)<{\stackrel{\u02c6}{S}}_{\rho}(0)$, then when $\rho \in (0,{\delta}_{1}^{\ast})$, owing to the positivity of matrix ${\mathrm{\Delta}}_{\rho}$, we obtain ${\overline{J}}_{\rho}(n)<{J}_{\rho}(n)<{\stackrel{\u02c6}{J}}_{\rho}(n)$ and ${\overline{S}}_{\rho}(n)<{S}_{\rho}(n)<{\stackrel{\u02c6}{S}}_{\rho}(n)$ for all $n\in Z$. Therefore, we finally have ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}({J}_{\rho}(n),{S}_{\rho}(n))={E}_{\rho}^{\ast}({J}_{\rho}^{\ast},{S}_{\rho}^{\ast})$. This completes the proof of Lemma 2.2. □

Directly from Lemma 2.2, we have the following result.

**Corollary 2.1** *Assume that* (H_{1}) *to* (H_{4}) *hold and* ${A}^{\ast}>1$. *Then* ${E}^{\ast}({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$ *is a globally asymptotically stable equilibrium of model* (3).

In the following, we introduce the comparison principle of difference equations.

**Lemma 2.3** (see [21])

*Suppose that functions*$f,g:{Z}_{+}\times [0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty})$

*satisfy*$f(n,x)\le g(n,x)$ (

*or*$f(n,x)\ge g(n,x)$)

*for*$n\in {Z}_{+}$

*and*$x\in [0,\mathrm{\infty})$

*and*$g(n,x)$

*is nondecreasing with respect to*$x\ge 0$.

*If sequences*$\{x(n)\}$

*and*$\{u(n)\}$

*are the nonnegative solutions of the following difference equations*

*respectively*,

*and*$x(0)\le u(0)$ (

*or*$x(0)\ge u(0)$),

*then we have*

On the existence of equilibrium of model (9), we have the following result.

**Lemma 2.4**

*Assume that model*(9)

*is ultimately bounded with respect to*

*B*,

*that is*,

*there is a constant*$B>0$

*such that for any solution*$x(n)=({x}_{1}(n),{x}_{2}(n),\dots ,{x}_{n}(n))$

*of model*(9)

*Then model* (9) *has at least an equilibrium*.

*Proof* Let $x(n,{x}_{0})$ be the solution of model (9) with initial value $x(0)={x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$. From the continuity of $F(x)$, we can obtain that $x(n,{x}_{0})$ is continuous with respect to ${x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$. Firstly, we prove the following claims.

**Claim 2.1** *For any constant* $A>B$, *there is a constant* $\lambda >A$ *such that* $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<\lambda $ *for all* $n\in Z$ *and* ${x}_{0}\in {\overline{S}}_{A}$, *where* ${\overline{S}}_{A}$ *is the closure of set* ${S}_{A}$.

Then there is a ${k}_{1}>0$ such that $|x({n}_{k},{x}_{k})|>A$ for all $k\ge {k}_{1}$. Since $|x(0,{x}_{k})|=|{x}_{k}|<A$ for all $k\in Z$, there is a ${s}_{k}\in [0,{n}_{k})$ such that $|x({s}_{k},{x}_{k})|\le A$ and $|x(n,{x}_{k})|>A$ for all $n\in ({s}_{k},{n}_{k}]$ and $k\ge {k}_{1}$. Let ${\psi}_{k}=x({s}_{k},{x}_{k})$, then ${\psi}_{k}\in {\overline{S}}_{A}$ for all $k\ge {k}_{1}$. Without loss of generality, we can assume that there is a ${\psi}_{0}\in {\overline{S}}_{A}$ such that ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\psi}_{k}={\psi}_{0}$.

We consider solution $x(n,{\psi}_{0})$ of model (9), by the ultimate boundedness of model (9), there is an ${N}_{0}>0$ such that $|x(n,{\psi}_{0})|<B$ for all $n\ge {N}_{0}$. From the continuity of solution $x(n,{x}_{0})$ with respect to ${x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$, there is an integer ${N}_{1}>0$ such that $|x({N}_{0},{\psi}_{k})|<B$ for all $k\ge {N}_{1}$. Choose a constant ${M}_{1}>max\{A,|x(n,{\psi}_{0})|:n\in [0,{N}_{0}]\}$, then there is an integer ${N}_{2}>{N}_{1}$ such that $|x(n,{\psi}_{k})|<{M}_{1}$ for all $k\ge {N}_{2}$ and $n\in [0,{N}_{0}]$. Since $x({N}_{0},{\psi}_{k})=x({N}_{0},x({s}_{k},{x}_{k}))=x({N}_{0}+{s}_{k},{x}_{k})$, we obtain $|x({N}_{0}+{s}_{k},{x}_{k})|<B<A$ for all $k\ge {N}_{1}$. On the other hand, from ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}|x({n}_{k},{x}_{k})|=\mathrm{\infty}$, there is an ${N}_{3}>{N}_{2}$ such that $|x({n}_{k},{x}_{k})|>{M}_{1}>A$ for all $k\ge {N}_{3}$. Thus, we finally have ${s}_{k}<{N}_{0}+{s}_{k}<{n}_{k}$. Consequently, $|x({N}_{0}+{s}_{k},{x}_{k})|>A$, which leads to a contradiction with $|x({N}_{0}+{s}_{k},{x}_{k})|<A$. Therefore, Claim 2.1 is true.

By Claim 2.1, we can choose three constants ${B}_{0}<{B}_{1}<{B}_{2}$ such that $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<{B}_{0}$ for all ${x}_{0}\in {\overline{S}}_{B}$ and $n\in Z$, $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<{B}_{1}$ for all ${x}_{0}\in {\overline{S}}_{{B}_{0}}$ and $n\in Z$, $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<{B}_{2}$ for all ${x}_{0}\in {\overline{S}}_{{B}_{1}}$ and $n\in Z$. Let ${S}_{0}={\overline{S}}_{{B}_{0}}$, ${S}_{1}={S}_{{B}_{1}}$ and ${S}_{2}={\overline{S}}_{{B}_{2}}$. Then ${S}_{0}$, ${S}_{1}$ and ${S}_{2}$ are convex subsets of ${R}^{n}$ with ${S}_{0}$ and ${S}_{2}$ compact and ${S}_{1}$ open in ${S}_{2}$.

Next, we prove the following claim.

**Claim 2.2** *There is an integer* ${T}_{0}>0$ *such that* $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<{B}_{0}$ *for all* ${x}_{0}\in {S}_{2}$ *and* $n\ge {T}_{0}$.

Otherwise, there exist two sequences $\{{x}_{k}\}\subset {S}_{2}$ and $\{{t}_{k}\}$ satisfying ${t}_{k}\to \mathrm{\infty}$ as $k\to \mathrm{\infty}$ such that $|x({t}_{k},{x}_{k})|\ge {B}_{0}$ for all $k\in Z$. Without loss of generality, we can assume that there is a ${x}_{0}\in {S}_{2}$ such that ${lim}_{k\to \mathrm{\infty}}{x}_{k}={x}_{0}$.

By the ultimate boundedness of model (9), there exists an integer $q\in Z$ such that $|x(n,{x}_{0})|<B$ for all $n>q$. From the continuity of solution $x(n,{x}_{0})$ of model (9) with respect to ${x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$, there exists an integer ${J}_{0}\in Z$ such that $|x(n,{x}_{k})|<B$ for $n\in [q,2q]$ and $k>{J}_{0}$. This implies that $|x(2q,{x}_{k})|<B$. Let ${\psi}_{k}=x(2q,{x}_{k})$, then we have $|x(n,{\psi}_{k})|<{B}_{0}$ for all $n\in Z$. Since $x(n,{\psi}_{k})=x(n+2q,{x}_{k})$ for all $n\ge 0$, we have $|x(n,{x}_{k})|<{B}_{0}$ for all $n\ge 2q$ and $j>{J}_{0}$ which leads to a contradiction with $|x({t}_{k},{x}_{k})|\ge {B}_{0}$ if ${t}_{k}\ge 2q$. Therefore, Claim 2.2 is true.

Then we have ${P}^{j}({S}_{1})\subset {S}_{2}$ for all $j\in N$. Choose an integer $m\in N$ such that $m>{T}_{0}$, where ${T}_{0}$ is given in Claim 2.2. From Claim 2.2, we can obtain that ${P}^{j}({S}_{2})\subset {S}_{0}$ for all $j\ge m$.

From the above discussion, we see that all conditions of the Horn fixed-point theorem (see [22]) are satisfied. Therefore, map *P* has at least a fixed point ${x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$. Consequently, model (9) has at least an equilibrium ${x}_{0}\in {R}^{n}$. This completes the proof of Lemma 2.4. □

In order to discuss the local stability of endemic equilibrium of model (1), we also need the following result (see [[22], Lemma 2.2]).

**Lemma 2.5**

*Let equation*${x}^{3}+b{x}^{2}+cx+d=0$,

*where*$b,c,d\in R$.

*Let further*$A={b}^{2}-3c$, $B=bc-9d$, $C={c}^{2}-3bd$

*and*$\mathrm{\Delta}={B}^{2}-4AC$.

*Then we have*

- (1)
*The equation has three different real roots if and only if*$\mathrm{\Delta}\le 0$; - (2)
*The equation has one real root and a pair of conjugate complex roots if and only if*Δ>0.*Further*,*the conjugate complex roots are*$w=\frac{-2b+{Y}_{1}^{\frac{1}{3}}+{Y}_{2}^{\frac{1}{3}}}{6}\pm i\frac{\sqrt{3}({Y}_{1}^{\frac{1}{3}}-{Y}_{2}^{\frac{1}{3}})}{6},$

*where*

## 3 Permanence and extinction

Firstly, on the ultimate boundedness of all positive solutions of model (1), we have the following result.

**Theorem 3.1**

*Assume that*(H

_{1})

*and*(H

_{2})

*hold*.

*Then for any positive solution*$(J(n),S(n),I(n))$

*of model*(1),

*Proof*Since $0<R<1$ and $\xi +R>1$, there exists a constant ${N}_{0}>0$ such that $\xi /(1+\beta {N}_{0})+R=1$. Obviously,

We consider the following three cases.

Then the conclusion of Theorem 3.1 is obviously true in this case.

_{2}) and (11) that

which implies ${lim\hspace{0.17em}sup}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}N(n)=0$. This leads to a contradiction with (12). Therefore, the statement of Case II is false.

Case III. $N(n)$ oscillates about $(\xi +R-1)(R+\xi )/(1-R)\beta $.

which implies that (10) hold. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. □

Next, on the permanence of all positive solutions of model (1), we have the following result.

**Theorem 3.2**

*Assume that*(H

_{1})

*to*(H

_{4})

*hold*, ${B}^{\ast}>1$

*and*${R}_{0}>1$.

*Then the disease in model*(1)

*is permanent*,

*where*

${B}^{\ast}$, ${S}^{\ast}$ *and* *M* *are given in* (6), (8) *and* (10), *respectively*.

*Proof*Let $(J(n),S(n),I(n))$ be any positive solution of model (1), we need only prove that there exists constant ${m}_{3}>0$ such that

where ${E}^{\ast}({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast})$ and ${E}_{\rho}^{\ast}({J}_{\rho}^{\ast},{S}_{\rho}^{\ast})$ are the positive equilibria of model (3) and model (7), respectively. Set ${\alpha}_{0}=\delta /2$. We consider the following three cases.

Case 1. There exists ${n}_{1}\ge {n}_{0}$ such that $I(n)\ge {\alpha}_{0}$ for all $n\ge {n}_{1}$.

In this case, we only need choose ${m}_{3}={\alpha}_{0}$, then (14) hold.

Case 2. There exists ${n}_{1}\ge {n}_{0}$ such that $I(n)<{\alpha}_{0}$ for all $n\ge {n}_{1}$.

From this, we further have ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}I(n)=\mathrm{\infty}$, which leads to a contradiction with $I(n)<{\alpha}_{0}$ for all $n\ge {n}_{1}$. Therefore, the statement of Case 2 is false.

Case 3. $I(n)$ oscillates about ${\alpha}_{0}$.

Choose ${m}_{3}={\alpha}_{0}{[{r}_{3}(1-\sigma )]}^{{N}_{0}+\overline{n}}$, then (14) is true. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.2. □

**Remark 3.1** From the expression of constant *M* given in Theorem 3.1, we see that *M* is a quite big positive constant. This shows that condition ${R}_{0}>1$ in Theorem 3.2 is quite strong. Therefore, an important and interesting open problem is to establish a more precise result on the permanence of the disease for model (1).

Further, on the extinction of the disease in model (1) we have the following result.

**Theorem 3.3** *Assume that* (H_{1}) *to* (H_{4}) *hold*, ${B}^{\ast}>1$ *and* ${R}_{1}<1$, *where* ${R}_{1}={r}_{2}\alpha +{r}_{3}(1-\sigma )$ *and* ${B}^{\ast}$ *is given in* (8). *Then disease*-*free equilibrium* $({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast},0)$ *of model* (1) *is globally stable*. *This shows that the disease in model* (1) *is extinct*.

From this, we immediately obtain ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}I(n)=0$. A similar argument as in the proof of Lemma 2.2 we can obtain that $J(n)\to {J}^{\ast}$ and $S(n)\to {S}^{\ast}$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$. This shows that disease-free equilibrium $({J}^{\ast},{S}^{\ast},0)$ of model (1) is globally stable. Consequently, the disease in model (1) is also extinct.

**Remark 3.2** Comparing ${R}_{0}$ with ${R}_{1}$, since $M\ge {S}^{\ast}$, we have ${R}_{0}\le {R}_{1}$. Therefore, combining the results given in Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3, we can give the following important and interesting open problem. That is, whether there exists a threshold value ${R}^{\ast}\in [{R}_{0},{R}_{1}]$ such that when ${R}^{\ast}<1$ then the disease in model (1) is extinct and when ${R}^{\ast}>1$ then the disease in model (1) is permanent.

## 4 Existence and stability of endemic equilibrium

Firstly, directly applying Lemma 2.4, we have the following result on the existence of the endemic equilibrium of model (1).

**Theorem 4.1** *Assume that all conditions of Theorem * 3.2 *hold*. *Then model* (1) *has at least one endemic equilibrium* $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{J},\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I})$.

*Proof*

where *α* and *β* are constants, we have that if $0<\alpha <1$ and $\beta >0$ then any solution $x(n)$ of equation (21) satisfies ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}x(n)=\beta /(1-\alpha )$. Therefore, we can choose an integer ${N}_{0}>0$ such that $x(n)\ge \beta /2(1-\alpha )$ for all $n\ge {N}_{0}$.

*M*is given in (10). From this, we further have for any $n\ge {N}_{1}$

for all $n\ge {N}_{3}$. From (22)-(24), we see that model (1) is permanent. Therefore, by Lemma 2.4 we can obtain that model (1) has at least an endemic equilibrium. This completes the proof of this Theorem 4.1. □

**Remark 4.1** From Theorem 4.1, we obtain that if model (1) is permanent, then model (1) has at least an endemic equilibrium.

Therefore, when $\stackrel{\u02c6}{J}+\stackrel{\u02c6}{S}+\stackrel{\u02c6}{I}>0$ and $\stackrel{\u02c6}{I}>0$, namely ${R}_{0}^{\ast}>1$ and ${R}_{1}^{\ast}>1$, we can obtain that algebra equation (25) has a unique positive solution which are given in (26)-(29). Therefore, we obtain a result on the existence of the endemic equilibrium for model (1).

**Theorem 4.2** *If* ${R}_{0}^{\ast}>1$ *and* ${R}_{1}^{\ast}>1$, *then model* (1) *has only an endemic equilibrium* $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{J},\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I})$ *and which are given in* (26)-(29).

**Remark 4.2** On the existence of endemic equilibrium of model (1), we note that the method of Theorem 4.1 is totally different to the method in Theorem 4.2. From the expressions of ${R}_{0}$ and ${B}^{\ast}$ in Theorem 3.2, ${R}_{0}^{\ast}$ and ${R}_{1}^{\ast}$ of Theorem 4.2, we cannot get the relationship between them. However, we note that Theorem 4.1 implies Theorem 4.2. So, we have the following interesting conjecture.

**Conjecture 4.1** *If all conditions of Theorem * 3.2 *holds*, *then model* (1) *has only an endemic equilibrium* $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{J},\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I})$ *and which are given in* (26)-(29).

When $\mathrm{\Delta}\le 0$, by Lemma 2.5, we have that equation (30) has three real roots ${\lambda}_{1}$, ${\lambda}_{2}$ and ${\lambda}_{3}$. From this, we can easily prove that two roots ${\lambda}_{1,2}^{\ast}$ of equation ${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )=0$ also are real.

Therefore, on the local asymptotical stability of endemic equilibrium $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{J},\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I})$, we have the following result.

**Theorem 4.3**

*Suppose that*${R}_{0}^{\ast}>1$

*and*${R}_{1}^{\ast}>1$.

*If one of the following conditions holds*,

*then endemic equilibrium*$(\stackrel{\u02c6}{J},\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I})$

*of model*(1)

*is locally asymptotically stable*.

- (a)
$\mathrm{\Delta}\le 0$, $F(1)>0$, $F(-1)<0$

*and the roots*${\lambda}_{1,2}^{\ast}$*of*${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )=0$*satisfy*$-1<{\lambda}_{1,2}^{\ast}<1$. - (b)
$\mathrm{\Delta}>0$, $F(1)>0$, $F(-1)<0$

*and the conjugate complex roots*${\lambda}_{2,3}$*satisfy*$|{\lambda}_{2,3}|<1$.

*Proof* Let $\mathrm{\Delta}\le 0$, then equation (30) has three real roots ${\lambda}_{1}$, ${\lambda}_{2}$ and ${\lambda}_{3}$. We assume ${\lambda}_{1}\le {\lambda}_{2}\le {\lambda}_{3}$. Further, we obtain that equation ${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )=0$ has two real roots ${\lambda}_{1}^{\ast}$ and ${\lambda}_{2}^{\ast}$ with ${\lambda}_{1}^{\ast}\le {\lambda}_{2}^{\ast}$. From the expression of ${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )$ we have ${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )>0$ for all $\lambda \in (-\mathrm{\infty},{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast})\cup ({\lambda}_{2}^{\ast},+\mathrm{\infty})$ and ${F}^{\prime}(\lambda )<0$ for all $\lambda \in ({\lambda}_{1}^{\ast},{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast})$. Hence, $F(\lambda )$ is increasing for all $\lambda \in (-\mathrm{\infty},{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast})\cup ({\lambda}_{2}^{\ast},+\mathrm{\infty})$ and decreasing for all $\lambda \in ({\lambda}_{1}^{\ast},{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast})$. Therefore, we finally obtain $F({\lambda}_{1}^{\ast})\ge 0$, $F({\lambda}_{2}^{\ast})\le 0$, ${\lambda}_{1}\in (-\mathrm{\infty},{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast}]$, ${\lambda}_{2}\in [{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast},{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast}]$ and ${\lambda}_{3}\in [{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast},+\mathrm{\infty})$.

Let condition (a) hold. Then we obviously have ${\lambda}_{1}\in (-1,{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast}]$, ${\lambda}_{2}\in [{\lambda}_{1}^{\ast},{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast}]$ and ${\lambda}_{3}\in [{\lambda}_{2}^{\ast},1)$. Therefore, $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I},\stackrel{\u02c6}{R})$ is locally asymptotically stable.

Now, we let $\mathrm{\Delta}>0$. If condition (b) holds, then from $F(1)>0$ and $F(-1)<0$ we have that real root ${\lambda}_{1}\in (-1,1)$. Therefore, from $|{\lambda}_{2,3}|<1$ we obtain that $(\stackrel{\u02c6}{S},\stackrel{\u02c6}{I},\stackrel{\u02c6}{R})$ is also locally asymptotically stable. This completes the proof of Theorem 4.3. □

**Remark 4.3** From Theorem 4.3, we note that model (1) has only an endemic equilibrium and which is locally asymptotical stability. It is different from continuous epidemic models. So, discrete epidemic models have more complex dynamic behaviors than normal.

## 5 Numerical simulation

In this section, we carry out numerical simulations on model (1) to demonstrate the results in Sections 3 and 4.

Finally, we easily see that model (1) can exhibit more complicated dynamical behaviors from the following two examples.

From Figure 5, we can see that the disease free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when ${r}_{1}\in (0,0.77)$, the endemic equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable when ${r}_{1}\in (0.843,0.9)$ and the bifurcation appears when ${r}_{1}\in (0.777,0.843)$.

## 6 Discussion

In this paper, we discuss the dynamical behaviors of model (1). In order to the sufficient conditions of the permanence and distinct of the disease, we first establish some lemmas for disease free model (3) and auxiliary system (7) in Section 2. From the results of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3, we can see that there exists a gap between ${R}_{0}$ and ${R}_{1}$. Furthermore, the existence and local stability of the endemic equilibrium are discussed. In view of the numerical simulations, we note that the discrete epidemic models have more complex dynamic behaviors than the corresponding continuous epidemic models.

*q*and

*p*are positive integers. We can obtain the following model:

We will discuss these models in our future works.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work is in part supported by the Scientific Research Programmes of Colleges in Xinjiang (Grant No. XJEDU2011S08), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11271312, 11001235), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 20110491750, 2012T50836) and the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang (Grant No. 2011211B08).

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Castillo-Chavez C, Yakubu A-A: Discrete-time SIS models with complex dynamics.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2001, 47: 4753–4762.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Allen LJS: Some discrete-time SI, SIR, and SIS epidemic models.
*Math. Biosci.*1994, 124: 83–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li X, Wang W: A discrete epidemic model with stage structure.
*Chaos Solitons Fractals*2005, 26: 947–958.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li J, Ma ZE, Brauer F: Global analysis of discrete-time SI and SIS epidemic models.
*Math. Biosci. Eng.*2007, 4: 699–710.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ramani A, Carstea A, Willox R, Grammaticos B: Oscillating epidemics: a discrete-time model.
*Physica A*2004, 333: 278–292.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Satsuma J, Willox R, Ramani A, Grammaticos B, Carstea A: Extending the SIR epidemic model.
*Physica A*2004, 336: 369–375.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhang D, Shi B: Oscillation and global asymptotic stability in a discrete epidemic model.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2003, 278: 194–202.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mendez V, Fort J: Dynamical evolution of discrete epidemic models.
*Physica A*2000, 284: 309–317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhou YC, Ma EN, Brauer F: A discrete epidemic model for SARS transmission and control in China.
*Math. Comput. Model.*2004, 40: 1491–1506.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Allen LJS, Driessche P: The basic reproduction number in some discrete-time epidemic models.
*J. Differ. Equ. Appl.*2008, 14: 1127–1147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - D’innocenzo A, Paladini F, Renna L: A numerical investigation of discrete oscillating epidemic models.
*Physica A*2006, 364: 497–512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Willoxa R, Grammaticosa B, Carsteab AS, Ramani A: Epidemic dynamics: discrete-time and cellular automaton models.
*Physica A*2003, 328: 13–22.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Franke JE, Yakubu A-A: Disease-induced mortality in density-dependent discrete-time S-I-S epidemic models.
*J. Math. Biol.*2008, 57: 755–790.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Allen LJS, Lou Y, Nevai AL: Spatial patterns in a discrete-time SIS patch model.
*J. Math. Biol.*2009, 58: 339–375.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li J, Lou J, Lou M: Some discrete SI and SIS epidemic models.
*Appl. Math. Mech.*2008, 29: 113–119.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhou Y, Pergola P: Dynamics of a discrete age-structure SIS models.
*Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B*2004, 4: 841–850.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Anderson R, May R:
*Infectious Diseases of Human: Dynamics and Control*. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1991.Google Scholar - Capsso V, Serio G: A generalization of the Kermack-Mckendrick deterministic epidemic model.
*Math. Biosci.*1978, 42: 43–61.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Liu W, Levin SA, Iwasa Y: Influence of nonlinear incidence rates upon the behavior of SIRS epidemiological models.
*J. Math. Biol.*1986, 23: 187–204.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xiao YN, Chen LS: On an SIS epidemic model with stage structure.
*J. Syst. Sci. Complex.*2003, 2: 275–288.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Wang L, Wang MQ:
*Ordinary Difference Equation*. Xinjiang Univ. Press, Xinjiang; 1989. (in Chinese)Google Scholar - Fan S: A new extracting formula and a new distinguishing means on the one variable cubic equation.
*Nat. Sci. J. Hainan Teach. Coll.*1989, 2: 91–98.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.