- Research
- Open Access
A fourth-order finite difference method based on spline in tension approximation for the solution of one-space dimensional second-order quasi-linear hyperbolic equations
- Ranjan K Mohanty^{1}Email author and
- Venu Gopal^{2}
https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-70
© Mohanty and Gopal; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 19 November 2012
- Accepted: 1 March 2013
- Published: 22 March 2013
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new three-level implicit nine-point compact finite difference formulation of order two in time and four in space directions, based on spline in tension approximation in x-direction and central finite difference approximation in t-direction for the numerical solution of one-space dimensional second-order quasi-linear hyperbolic equations with first-order space derivative term. We describe the mathematical formulation procedure in detail and also discuss how our formulation is able to handle a wave equation in polar coordinates. The proposed method, when applied to a general form of the telegrapher equation, is also shown to be unconditionally stable. Numerical examples are used to illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method.
MSC: 65M06, 65M12.
Keywords
- second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equation
- spline in tension
- wave equation in polar coordinates
- stability analysis
- maximum absolute errors
1 Introduction
We assume that the conditions (1.2) and (1.3) are given with sufficient smoothness to maintain the order of accuracy in the numerical method under consideration.
The study of a second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equation is of keen interest in the fields like acoustics, electromagnetics, fluid dynamics, mathematical physics, engineering etc. Many efforts are going on to develop efficient and high accuracy methods for such types of partial differential equations. The term ‘spline’ in the spline function arises from the prefabricated wood or plastic curve board, which is called spline and is used by a draftman to plot smooth curves through connecting the known points. In early 1969, the cubic spline method was proposed to be applied on the differential equation to get their numerical solutions, and it was in 1974 that Raggett et al. [1] and Fleck, Jr. [2] successfully implemented cubic spline techniques to 1D wave equations. But, still so far in literature, a very limited number of spline methods are there for second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equations. During last three decades, there has been much effort to develop stable numerical methods based on spline approximations for the solution of the differential equations. Fyfe [3], Jain et al. [4, 5], Al-Said [6, 7], Khan et al. [8] and Kadalbajoo et al. [9] have studied the solution of two point boundary value problems by using the cubic spline method. Kadalbajoo et al. [10–12], Marušić [13] and Khan et al. [14] have developed the tension spline method for the numerical solution of singular perturbed boundary value problems. Mohanty et al. [15, 16] on both uniform as well as non-uniform mesh have used tension spline to find the numerical solution of singular perturbed boundary value problems. The computational techniques based on cubic spline are discussed in detail by Khan et al. [17] and Kumar et al. [18] for the differential equations. Apart from initial work by Raggett et al. [1] and Fleck, Jr. [2] on wave equations using cubic splines, recently, Rashidinia et al. [19], Ding et al. [20] and Mohanty et al. [21–23] have studied the cubic spline and compact finite difference method for the numerical solution of hyperbolic problems. More recently, Ding et al. [24, 25] and Rashidinia et al. [26, 27] have formulated the solution of second-order telegraph equations and a nonlinear Klein-Gordon, sine-Gordon equation by using parametric spline, respectively. In the present paper, we follow the idea of Jain et al. [5, 28] but use non-polynomial tension spline approximation to develop an method of order four for the solution of a wave equation in polar co-ordinates with a significant first-order derivative term. We have shown that our method is in general of order four but, for the sake of computation of the result, we have used the consistency of the first-order continuity condition.
In this paper, using nine grid points, we discuss a new three-level implicit spline in the tension finite difference method of accuracy two in time and four in space for the solution of a one-space dimensional second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equation. In this method, we require only three evaluations of a function g. In Section 2, we discuss spline in tension and its properties. In Section 3, we propose a new three-level Numerov-type finite difference method based on spline in tension approximation. In Section 4, we derive the proposed method. In Section 5 and Section 6, we discuss the application of our method to some important physical problems like wave equation in polar coordinates and telegraph equation in a general form and their stability analysis. Difficulties were experienced in the past for the high-order spline solution of a wave equation in polar coordinates. The solution usually deteriorates in the vicinity of the singularity. We modify our technique in such a way that the solution retains its order and accuracy everywhere in the solution region. In Section 7, we establish, under appropriate conditions, the fourth-order convergence of the method. In Section 8, we discuss the higher-order approximation at first time level in order to compute the proposed numerical method of same accuracy and compare the numerical results with the results of the corresponding second-order accuracy spline in tension method. Concluding remarks are given in Section 9.
2 Spline in tension approximation
where ${x}_{l}\le x\le {x}_{l+1}$ and ${a}_{l}^{j}$, ${b}_{l}^{j}$, ${c}_{l}^{j}$, ${d}_{l}^{j}$ are unknowns, and ω is an arbitrary parameter to be determined. ${S}^{j}(x)$ is a class of ${C}^{2}[0,1]$, which interpolates $u(x,t)$ at the grid point $({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$ at j th time level.
where $\theta =\omega h$ and $l=0,1,2,\dots ,N-1$.
From (2.5), we obtain the consistency condition $\alpha +2\beta +\alpha =1$, which is equivalent to the equation $tanh\frac{\theta}{2}=\frac{\theta}{2}$. This equation has an infinite number of roots. Solving graphically, we obtain the smallest nonzero positive value $\theta =0.001$.
Note that (2.4), (2.8), (2.9) and (2.10) are important properties of the non-polynomial cubic spline in tension function ${S}^{j}(x)$.
3 The finite difference method based on spline in tension approximation
with the given initial conditions (1.2) and boundary conditions (1.3).
The solution domain $[0,1]\times [t>0]$ is divided into $(N+1)\times J$ mesh with the spatial step size $h=1/(N+1)$ in x-direction and the time step size $k>0$ in t-direction, respectively, where N and J are positive integers. The mesh ratio parameter is given by $\lambda =(k/h)>0$. Grid points are defined by $({x}_{l},{t}_{j})=(lh,jk)$, $l=0,1,2,\dots ,N+1$ and $j=0,1,2,\dots ,J$. The notations ${u}_{l}^{j}$ and ${U}_{l}^{j}$ are used for the discrete approximation and the exact value of $u(x,t)$ at the grid point $({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$, respectively. Similarly, at the grid point $({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$, we define ${A}_{l}^{j}=A({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$, ${A}_{xl}^{j}={A}_{x}({x}_{l},{t}_{j}),\dots $ , etc.
in which we use spline in tension function ${U}_{l}^{j}={S}^{j}({x}_{l})$, the approximation of its first-order space derivative defined by (3.6a)-(3.6c) in x-direction and central difference approximations of time derivative defined by (3.2a)-(3.2d) in t-direction.
4 Derivation of the method
For the derivation of a Numorov-type method (3.8) based on spline in tension approximations for the numerical solution of differential equation (3.1), we follow the ideas of Jain et al. [5, 28]. We use spline in tension approximations in x-direction and second-order finite difference approximation in t-direction.
Using the approximations (4.4a)-(4.4d) and (4.8a)-(4.8c), from (3.8) and (4.3), we obtain the local truncation error ${\stackrel{\u02c6}{T}}_{l}^{j}=O({k}^{4}+{k}^{4}{h}^{2}+{k}^{2}{h}^{4})$.
Now, we consider the numerical method of $O({k}^{4}+{k}^{4}{h}^{2}+{k}^{2}{h}^{4})$ for the solution of 1D second-order quasi-linear hyperbolic equation (1.1).
where ${f}_{l}=f({x}_{l})$, ${f}_{xxl}=\frac{{d}^{2}{f}_{l}}{d{x}^{2}}$.
where ${f}_{l}=f({x}_{l},{U}_{l})$. Note that (4.11) is consistent with the differential equation ${u}^{\u2033}=f(x,u)$.
Thus, substituting the central differences (4.12a)-(4.12b) into (3.8), we obtain the required numerical method of $O({k}^{2}+{k}^{2}{h}^{2}+{h}^{4})$ for the solution of second-order quasi-linear hyperbolic equation (1.1) and hence the local truncation error retains its order, that is, ${\stackrel{\u02c6}{T}}_{l}^{j}=O({k}^{4}+{k}^{4}{h}^{2}+{k}^{2}{h}^{4})$.
Note that the initial and Dirichlet boundary conditions are given by (1.2) and (1.3), respectively. Incorporating the initial and boundary conditions, we can write the method (3.8) in a tri-diagonal matrix form. If differential equation (1.1) is linear, we can solve the linear system using the Gauss-elimination (tri-diagonal solver) method; in the nonlinear case, we can use the Newton-Raphson iterative method to solve the nonlinear system (see Kelly [29], Hageman and Young [30]).
5 Application to wave equation with singular coefficients and stability analysis
Assume that $f(r,t)\in {C}^{2}(0,1)\times [t>0]$ and the conditions (5.2) and (5.3) are given with sufficient smoothness to maintain the order of accuracy in the numerical method under consideration.
where the approximations associated with (5.4) are defined in Section 3.
and ${\mu}_{r}{u}_{l}=\frac{1}{2}({u}_{l+\frac{1}{2}}+{u}_{l-\frac{1}{2}})$ and ${\delta}_{r}{u}_{l}=({u}_{l+\frac{1}{2}}-{u}_{l-\frac{1}{2}})$ are averaging and central difference operators with respect to r-direction, etc. This implies $(2{\mu}_{r}{\delta}_{r}){u}_{l}^{j}={u}_{l+1}^{j}-{u}_{l-1}^{j}$, ${\delta}_{r}^{2}{u}_{l}^{j}={u}_{l+1}^{j}-2{u}_{l}^{j}+{u}_{l-1}^{j}$, ${\delta}_{t}^{2}{u}_{l}^{j}={u}_{l}^{j+1}-2{u}_{l}^{j}+{u}_{l}^{j-1}$, etc. The spline in tension finite difference scheme (5.6) has a local truncation error of $O({k}^{2}+{h}^{4})$ and is free from the terms $\frac{1}{l\pm 1}$ and hence it can be solved for $l=1(1)N$, $j=1(1)J$ in the region $0<r<1$, $t>0$.
leading to $|\xi |=1$. It is easy to verify that as $l\to \mathrm{\infty}$, $0<{\lambda}^{2}\le 1$.
6 Application to telegraph equation in a general form and stability analysis
where $\alpha >0$, $\beta \ge 0$ are real parameters. For $\beta =0$, the equation above represents a damped wave equation. The initial and boundary conditions are prescribed by (1.2) and (1.3), respectively. The telegraph equation is a linear differential equation which describes the voltage and current on an electric transmission line with distance and time. In fact, the telegraph equation is more suitable than an ordinary diffusion equation in modeling reaction-diffusion for such branches of science. In equation (6.1), $u(x,t)$ is either voltage or current through the wire at position x and time t, and $\alpha =Z/C$, $\beta =\mathrm{\Re}/I$ and ${c}^{2}=1/(IC)$, where Z is the conductance of a resistor, ℜ is the resistance of the resistor, I is the inductance of the coil and C is the capacitance of the capacitor.
Now onwards, we denote $a={(\frac{\alpha +\beta}{2})}^{2}{k}^{2}$, $b=\alpha \beta {k}^{2}$; and ${f}_{l}^{j}=f({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$.
The necessary and sufficient condition for $|\xi |<1$ is that $p+q+r>0$, $p-r>0$, $p-q+r>0$. The conditions $p+q+r>0$ and $p-r>0$ are satisfied for $\alpha >0$, $\beta \ge 0$ and for all θ except $(\theta ,\beta )=(0,0)\text{or}(2\pi ,0)$. We can treat this case separately.
where η and γ are free parameters to be determined. The additional terms $\eta {b}^{2}{\delta}_{t}^{2}{u}_{l}^{j}$ and $-\gamma {\lambda}^{2}{c}^{2}{\delta}_{x}^{2}{\delta}_{t}^{2}{u}_{l}^{j}$ are of higher order and do not affect the consistency and accuracy of the scheme. Now using the technique discussed in [21] and [22], we find that for $\alpha >0$, $\beta \ge 0$, $\eta \ge \frac{1}{64}$; and $\gamma \ge \frac{1+3{\lambda}^{2}{c}^{2}}{12{\lambda}^{2}{c}^{2}}$, the spline in tension finite difference scheme (6.6) is stable for all choices of $h>0$ and $k>0$.
7 Convergence analysis
with the initial and boundary conditions which are prescribed by (1.2) and (1.3), respectively.
We assume that the initial value problem (7.1), (1.2)-(1.3) has a unique smooth solution $u(x,t)$ and the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) $g(x,t,u,{u}_{x},{u}_{t})$ is continuous,
where ${\xi}_{i}$ and ${\xi}_{i}^{\ast}$ are arbitrary real numbers and L is a Lipschitz constant,
(iii) $a(x)$ and $b(x)$ are continuously differentiable up to order four and two, respectively.
where ${\overline{G}}_{l}^{j}=g({x}_{l},{t}_{j},{U}_{l}^{j},{\overline{U}}_{xl}^{j},{\overline{U}}_{tl}^{j})$, ${\stackrel{\u02c6}{G}}_{l}^{j}=g({x}_{l},{t}_{j},{U}_{l}^{j},{\stackrel{\u02c6}{U}}_{xl}^{j},{\overline{U}}_{tl}^{j})$, etc., … and ${T}_{l}^{j}=O({k}^{4}+{k}^{4}{h}^{2}+{k}^{2}{h}^{4})$.
Let ${\mathbf{U}}^{j}={[{U}_{1}^{j},{U}_{2}^{j},\dots ,{U}_{N}^{j}]}^{T}$ (T denotes transpose) and ${\mathbf{u}}^{j}={[{u}_{1}^{j},{u}_{2}^{j},\dots ,{u}_{N}^{j}]}^{T}$ be the exact and approximate solution vectors of the solution $u(x,t)$ at the grid point $({x}_{l},{t}_{j})$, respectively, and $\mathbf{T}={[{T}_{1}^{j},{T}_{2}^{j},\dots ,{T}_{N}^{j}]}^{T}$ be the local truncation error vector.
where ${\overline{g}}_{l}^{j}=g({x}_{l},{t}_{j},{u}_{l}^{j},{\overline{u}}_{xl}^{j},{\overline{u}}_{tl}^{j})$, ${\stackrel{\u02c6}{g}}_{l}^{j}=g({x}_{l},{t}_{j},{u}_{l}^{j},{\stackrel{\u02c6}{u}}_{xl}^{j},{\overline{u}}_{tl}^{j})$, etc., … .
where $\mathbf{D}={[-1,-10,-1]}^{T}$ and $\mathbf{C}={[1+6{\lambda}^{2},10-12{\lambda}^{2},1+6{\lambda}^{2}]}^{T}$ are tri-diagonal matrices of order N.
Let ${\epsilon}_{l}^{j}={u}_{l}^{j}-{U}_{l}^{j}$ and ${\mathbf{E}}^{j}={\mathbf{u}}^{j}-{\mathbf{U}}^{j}={[{\epsilon}_{1}^{j},{\epsilon}_{2}^{j},\dots ,{\epsilon}_{N}^{j}]}^{T}$.
where P, Q and R are the coefficient matrices of error vectors ${\mathbf{E}}^{j+1}$, ${\mathbf{E}}^{j}$ and ${\mathbf{E}}^{j-1}$, respectively.
and hence $\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{P}$ is irreducible (see Varga [32]).
and hence, $\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{P}$ is also monotone.
Then, ${(\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{P})}^{-1}$ exists and ${(\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{P})}^{-1}\ge 0$ (see Varga [32]), i.e., ${(\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{P})}_{l,m}^{-1}\ge 0$.
Let $\parallel {E}^{j+1}\parallel =max\{|{\epsilon}_{l}^{j+1}|:l=1(1)N\}$.
This establishes the fourth-order convergence of the method.
8 Numerical illustrations
In this section, we solve some benchmark problems using the method described by equation (3.8) and compare our results with those obtained by the numerical method of $O({k}^{2}+{h}^{2})$ accuracy based on spline in tension approximations. The exact solutions are provided in each case. The linear difference equation was solved using a tri-diagonal solver, whereas nonlinear difference equations were solved using the Newton-Raphson method. While using the Newton-Raphson method, the iterations were stopped when absolute error tolerance ≤10^{−10} was achieved. In order to demonstrate the fourth-order convergence of the proposed method, throughout the computation, we chose the fixed value of the parameter $\sigma =\frac{k}{{h}^{2}}=3.2$. All computations were carried out using double precision arithmetic.
Note that, the proposed spline in tension finite difference method (3.8) for second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equations is a three-level scheme. The value of u at $t=0$ is known from the initial condition. To start any computation, it is necessary to know the numerical value of u of required accuracy at $t=k$. In this section, we discuss an explicit scheme of $O({k}^{2})$ for u at first time level, i.e., at $t=k$ in order to solve differential equation (1.1) using the method (3.8), which is applicable to problems in Cartesian and polar coordinates.
Since the values of u and ${u}_{t}$ are known explicitly at $t=0$, this implies all their successive tangential derivatives are known at $t=0$, i.e., the values of $u,{u}_{x},{u}_{xx},\dots ,{u}_{t},{u}_{tx},\dots $ , etc. are known at $t=0$.
Thus, using the initial values and their successive tangential derivative values, from (8.2) we can obtain the value of ${({u}_{tt})}_{l}^{0}$, and then ultimately, from (8.1) we can compute the value of u at first time level, i.e., at $t=k$. Replacing the variable x by r in (8.1), we can also obtain an approximation of $O({k}^{2})$ for u at $t=k$ in polar coordinates.
Example 1: The maximum absolute errors
h | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{4}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method discussed in [33] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
$\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$, $\mathit{t}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{2}$, $\mathit{t}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$, $\mathit{t}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{2}$, $\mathit{t}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | |
$\frac{1}{8}$ | 0.4559(−04) | 0.3865(−04) | 0.6486(−04) | 0.5784(−04) |
$\frac{1}{16}$ | 0.2850(−05) | 0.2416(−05) | 0.4291(−05) | 0.3808(−05) |
$\frac{1}{32}$ | 0.1781(−06) | 0.1510(−06) | 0.2774(−06) | 0.2424(−06) |
$\frac{1}{64}$ | 0.1113(−07) | 0.9442(−08) | 0.1612(−07) | 0.1566(−07) |
Example 2: The maximum absolute errors
h | $\mathit{\alpha}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{6}$, $\mathit{\beta}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{4}$, $\mathit{\eta}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.5}$, $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\alpha}\mathbf{=}\mathit{\pi}$, $\mathit{\beta}\mathbf{=}\mathit{\pi}$, $\mathit{\eta}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$, $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\alpha}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{3}\mathit{\pi}$, $\mathit{\beta}\mathbf{=}\mathit{\pi}$, $\mathit{\eta}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$, $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{20}$ |
---|---|---|---|
$\frac{1}{8}$ | 0.2305(−04) | 0.2422(−04) | 0.2103(−04) |
^{*} | ^{*} | ^{*} | |
$\frac{1}{16}$ | 0.1743(−05) | 0.1704(−05) | 0.9626(−05) |
^{*} | ^{*} | ^{*} | |
$\frac{1}{32}$ | 0.1101(−06) | 0.1076(−06) | 0.6386(−06) |
^{*} | ^{*} | ^{*} | |
$\frac{1}{64}$ | 0.6889(−08) | 0.6730(−08) | 0.4006(−07) |
^{*} | ^{*} | ^{*} |
Example 3: The maximum absolute errors
h | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$ | |
$\frac{1}{8}$ | 0.1015(−03) | 0.1831(−02) | 0.4422(−01) | 0.3267(−03) | 0.2746(−02) | 0.4598(−01) |
$\frac{1}{16}$ | 0.6438(−05) | 0.1080(−03) | 0.3198(−02) | 0.6032(−04) | 0.3570(−03) | 0.4750(−02) |
$\frac{1}{32}$ | 0.4032(−06) | 0.6806(−05) | 0.1840(−03) | 0.1398(−04) | 0.6526(−04) | 0.8192(−03) |
$\frac{1}{64}$ | 0.2194(−07) | 0.4252(−06) | 0.1126(−04) | 0.3438(−05) | 0.1515(−04) | 0.1713(−03) |
Example 4: The maximum absolute errors
h | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method | $\mathit{O}\mathbf{(}{\mathit{k}}^{\mathbf{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{+}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\mathit{h}}^{\mathbf{4}}\mathbf{)}$-method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$ | $\mathit{\gamma}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$ | |
$\frac{1}{8}$ | 0.5927(-05) | 0.6006(-04) | 0.5058(-03) | 0.3267(-03) | 0.2746(-02) | 0.4598(-01) |
$\frac{1}{16}$ | 0.3601(-06) | 0.3476(-05) | 0.3100(-04) | 0.6032(-04) | 0.3570(-03) | 0.4750(-02) |
$\frac{1}{32}$ | 0.2225(-07) | 0.2150(-06) | 0.1952(-05) | 0.1398(-04) | 0.6526(-04) | 0.8192(-03) |
$\frac{1}{64}$ | 0.1389(-08) | 0.1339(-07) | 0.1222(-06) | 0.3438(-05) | 0.1515(-04) | 0.1713(-03) |
Order of convergence $\mathbf{:}{\mathit{h}}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{32}}$ , ${\mathit{h}}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{64}}$
Example | Parameters | Order of the method |
---|---|---|
01 | γ = 1 at t = 5 | 4.002 |
γ = 2 at t = 5 | 3.999 | |
02 | α = 6, β = 4, η = 0.5, γ = 1 at t = 2 | 3.998 |
α = π, β = π, η = 1, γ = 1 at t = 2 | 3.998 | |
α = 3π, β = π, η = 10, γ = 20 at t = 2 | 3.994 | |
03 | γ = 1 at t = 1 | 4.199 |
γ = 5 at t = 2 | 4.000 | |
γ = 10 at t = 2 | 4.030 | |
04 | γ = 1 at t = 2 | 4.001 |
γ = 2 at t = 2 | 4.005 | |
γ = 3 at t = 2 | 3.997 |
9 Concluding remarks
Available numerical methods based on spline in tension approximations for the numerical solution of second-order quasilinear hyperbolic equations are of $O({k}^{2}+{h}^{2})$ accuracy only and require 9-grid points. In this article, using the same number of grid points and three evaluations of the function g (as compared to five and nine evaluations of the function g discussed in [33] and [35]), we have derived a new stable spline in tension finite difference method of $O({k}^{2}+{h}^{4})$ accuracy for the solution of second-order quasi-linear hyperbolic equation (1.1). For a fixed parameter $\sigma =\frac{k}{{h}^{2}}$, the proposed method behaves like a fourth-order method, which is exhibited by the computed results. The proposed numerical method for the wave equation in polar coordinates is conditionally stable, whereas for the damped wave equation and the telegraphic equation, the method is shown to be unconditionally stable. From Table 5, we found that the order of the method is nearly equal to four.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This research work is supported by South Asian University, New Delhi, India. The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which substantially improved the standard of the paper.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Raggett GF, Wilson PD: A fully implicit finite difference approximation to the one-dimensional wave equation using a cubic spline technique. IMA J. Appl. Math. 1974, 14: 75–77. 10.1093/imamat/14.1.75MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fleck JA Jr.: A cubic spline method for solving the wave equation of nonlinear optics. J. Comput. Phys. 1974, 16: 324–341. 10.1016/0021-9991(74)90043-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fyfe DJ: The use of cubic splines in the solution of two point boundary value problems. Comput. J. 1969, 12: 188–192. 10.1093/comjnl/12.2.188MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jain MK, Aziz T: Spline function approximation for differential equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1981, 26(2):129–143. 10.1016/0045-7825(81)90090-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jain MK, Aziz T: Cubic spline solution of two-point boundary value problems with significant first derivatives. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1983, 39(1):83–91. 10.1016/0045-7825(83)90075-0MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Said EA: Spline methods for solving a system of second order boundary value problems. Int. J. Comput. Math. 1999, 70: 717–727. 10.1080/00207169908804784MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Said EA: The use of cubic splines in the numerical solution of a system of second order boundary value problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 2001, 42: 861–869. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00204-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan A, Aziz T: Parametric cubic spline approach to the solution of a system of second order boundary value problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2003, 118: 45–54. 10.1023/A:1024783323624MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kadalbajoo MK, Aggarwal VK: Cubic spline for solving singular two-point boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 156: 249–259. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.07.020MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kadalbajoo MK, Bawa RK: Cubic spline method for a class of non-linear singularly perturbed boundary value problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 1993, 76: 415–428. 10.1007/BF00939375MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kadalbajoo MK, Patidar KC: Tension spline for the numerical solution of singularly perturbed non-linear boundary value problems. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 21(3):717–742.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kadalbajoo MK, Patidar KC: Tension spline for the solution of self-adjoint singular perturbation problems. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2002, 79(7):849–865. 10.1080/00207160211293MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marušić M: A fourth/second order accurate collocation method for singularly perturbed two-point boundary value problems using tension splines. Numer. Math. 2001, 88(1):135–158. 10.1007/PL00005437MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan I, Aziz T: Tension spline method for second-order singularly perturbed boundary-value problems. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2005, 82(12):1547–1553. 10.1080/00207160410001684280MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Evans DJ, Arora U: Convergent spline in tension methods for singularly perturbed two-point singular boundary value problems. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2005, 82(1):55–66. 10.1080/0020716042000261414MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Arora U: A family of non-uniform mesh tension spline methods for singularly perturbed two-point singular boundary value problems with significant first derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 172(1):531–544. 10.1016/j.amc.2005.02.023MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan A, Khan I, Aziz T: A survey on parametric spline function approximation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 171(2):983–1003. 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.112MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar M, Srivastava PK: Computational techniques for solving differential equations cubic, quintic and sextic splines. Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 2009, 10: 108–115. 10.1080/15502280802623297MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rashidinia J, Jalilian R, Kazemi V: Spline methods for the solutions of hyperbolic equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 190: 882–886. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.082MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ding H, Zhang Y: Parametric spline methods for the solution of hyperbolic equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 204: 938–941. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.08.003MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Gopal V: High accuracy cubic spline finite difference approximation for the solution of one-space dimensional non-linear wave equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218(8):4234–4244. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.09.054MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Gopal V: An off-step discretization for the solution of 1D mildly nonlinear wave equations with variable coefficients. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Comput. 2012, 4(2):1–13.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Gopal V: High accuracy arithmetic average type discretization for the solution of two-space dimensional nonlinear wave equations. Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput. 2012., 3: Article ID 1150005Google Scholar
- Ding H, Zhang Y:A new unconditionally stable compact difference scheme of $O({\tau}^{2}+{h}^{4})$ for the 1D linear hyperbolic equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 207: 236–241. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.10.024MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ding H, Zhang Y, Cao J, Tian J: A class of difference scheme for solving telegraph equation by new non-polynomial spline methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218: 4671–4683. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.10.078MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rashidinia J, Mohammadi R: Tension spline approach for the numerical solution of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181(1):78–91. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.001MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rashidinia J, Mohammadi R: Tension spline solution of nonlinear sine-Gordon equation. Numer. Algorithms 2011, 56(1):129–142. 10.1007/s11075-010-9377-xMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jain MK: Numerical Solution of Differential Equations. 2nd edition. Wiley, New Delhi; 1984.Google Scholar
- Kelly CT: Iterative Methods for Linear and Non-Linear Equations. SIAM, Philadelphia; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hageman LA, Young DM: Applied Iterative Methods. Dover, New York; 2004.Google Scholar
- Mohanty RK: Stability interval for explicit difference schemes for multi-dimensional second order hyperbolic equations with significant first order space derivative terms. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 190: 1683–1690. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.02.097MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varga RS: Matrix Iterative Analysis. 2nd edition. Springer, Berlin; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Jain MK, George K: On the use of high order difference methods for the system of one space second order non-linear hyperbolic equations with variable coefficients. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1996, 72: 421–431. 10.1016/0377-0427(96)00011-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK: New unconditionally stable difference schemes for the solution of multi-dimensional telegraphic equations. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2009, 86: 2061–2071. 10.1080/00207160801965271MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty RK, Arora U: A new discretization method of order four for the numerical solution of one space dimensional second order quasi-linear hyperbolic equation. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 33: 829–838. 10.1080/00207390210162465MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.