# Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem of Second-Order Linear Equations on Time Scales

- Chao Zhang
^{1}Email author and - Shurong Sun
^{1}

**2009**:496135

https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/496135

© C. Zhang and S. Sun. 2009

**Received: **29 December 2008

**Accepted: **28 May 2009

**Published: **16 June 2009

## Abstract

This paper studies Sturm-Picone comparison theorem of second-order linear equations on time scales. We first establish Picone identity on time scales and obtain our main result by using it. Also, our result unifies the existing ones of second-order differential and difference equations.

## Keywords

## 1. Introduction

where and are real and rd-continuous functions in Let be a time scale, be the forward jump operator in , be the delta derivative, and .

First we briefly recall some existing results about differential and difference equations. As we well know, in 1909, Picone [1] established the following identity.

Picone Identity

By (1.4), one can easily obtain the Sturm comparison theorem of second-order linear differential equations (1.3).

Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem

where and for is the nabla derivative, and they get the Sturm comparison theorem. We will make use of Picone identity on time scales to prove the Sturm-Picone comparison theorem of (1.1) and (1.2).

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces some basic concepts and fundamental results about time scales, which will be used in Section 3. In Section 3 we first give the Picone identity on time scales, then we will employ this to prove our main result: Sturm-Picone comparison theorem of (1.1) and (1.2) on time scales.

## 2. Preliminaries

In this section, some basic concepts and some fundamental results on time scales are introduced.

Moreover, a function defined on is said to be rd-continuous if it is continuous at every right-dense point in and its left-sided limit exists at every left-dense point in .

For convenience, we introduce the following results ([11, Chapter 1], [12, Chapter 1], and [13, Lemma ]), which are useful in the paper.

Lemma 2.1.

Definition 2.2.

If the inequalities for are reversed in (i) and (ii), is said to be right-decreasing at .

The following result can be directly derived from (2.4).

Lemma 2.3.

Assume that is differentiable at If then is right-increasing at ; and if , then is right-decreasing at .

Definition 2.4.

One says that a solution of (1.1) has a generalized zero at if or, if is right-scattered and Especially, if then we say has a node at

The development of the theory uses similar arguments and the definition of the nabla derivative (see [10, Chapter 3]).

## 3. Main Results

In this section, we give and prove the main results of this paper.

can be rewritten as (1.1).

Theorem 3.1.

Proof.

where we used Lemma 2.1. This equation is in the form of (1.1) with and as desired.

Lemma 3.2 (Picone Identity).

Proof.

Combining and , we get (3.4). This completes the proof.

Now, we turn to proving the main result of this paper.

Theorem 3.3 (Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem).

then has at least one generalized zero on

Proof.

Suppose to the contrary, has no generalized zeros on and for all

Case 1.

which is a contradiction. Therefore, in Case 1, has at least one generalized zero on

Case 2.

which is a contradiction, too. Hence, in Case 2, has at least one generalized zero on .

Case 3.

It follows from the above discussion that has at least one generalized zero on This completes the proof.

Remark 3.4.

If then Theorem 3.3 reduces to classical Sturm comparison theorem.

Remark 3.5.

In the continuous case: . This result is the same as Sturm-Picone comparison theorem of second-order differential equations (see Section 1).

Remark 3.6.

In the discrete case: . This result is the same as Sturm comparison theorem of second-order difference equations (see [8, Chapter 8]).

Example 3.7.

By Theorem 3.3, we have if and are the nontrivial solutions of (1.1) and (1.2), are two consecutive generalized zeros of and then has at least one generalized zero on Obviously, the above three cases are not continuous and not discrete. So the existing results for the differential and difference equations are not available now.

By Remarks 3.4–3.6 and Example 3.7, the Sturm comparison theorem on time scales not only unifies the results in both the continuous and the discrete cases but also contains more complicated time scales.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Alberto Cabada (the editor) and the anonymous reviewer(s) for helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Natural Scientific Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant Y2007A27), (Grant Y2008A28), the Fund of Doctoral Program Research of University of Jinan (B0621), and the Natural Science Fund Project of Jinan University (XKY0704).

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Picone M:
**Sui valori eccezionali di un parametro da cui dipend unèquazione differenziale linear ordinaria del second ordine.***JMPA*1909,**11:**1-141.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kamke E:
**A new proof of Sturm's comparison theorems.***The American Mathematical Monthly*1939,**46:**417-421. 10.2307/2303035MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Leighton W:
**Comparison theorems for linear differential equations of second order.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1962,**13:**603-610. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1962-0140759-0MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Leighton W:
**Some elementary Sturm theory.***Journal of Differential Equations*1968,**4:**187-193. 10.1016/0022-0396(68)90035-1MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Reid WT:
**A comparison theorem for self-adjoint differential equations of second order.***Annals of Mathematics*1957,**65:**197-202. 10.2307/1969673MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhuang R:
**Sturm comparison theorem of solution for second order nonlinear differential equations.***Annals of Differential Equations*2003,**19**(3):480-486.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Zhuang R-K, Wu H-W:
**Sturm comparison theorem of solution for second order nonlinear differential equations.***Applied Mathematics and Computation*2005,**162**(3):1227-1235. 10.1016/j.amc.2004.03.004MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kelley WG, Peterson AC:
*Difference Equations: An Introduction with Applications*. 2nd edition. Harcourt/Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA; 2001:x+403.Google Scholar - Zhang BG:
**Sturm comparison theorem of difference equations.***Applied Mathematics and Computation*1995,**72**(2-3):277-284. 10.1016/0096-3003(94)00201-EMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bohner M, Peterso A:
*Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales*. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2003:xii+348.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bohner M, Peterson A:
*Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications*. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001:x+358.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lakshmikantham V, Sivasundaram S, Kaymakcalan B:
*Dynamic Systems on Measure Chains, Mathematics and Its Applications*.*Volume 370*. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1996:x+285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Agarwal RP, Bohner M:
**Basic calculus on time scales and some of its applications.***Results in Mathematics*1999,**35**(1-2):3-22.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hilger S:
**Special functions, Laplace and Fourier transform on measure chains.***Dynamic Systems and Applications*1999,**8**(3-4):471-488.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.