- Research Article
- Open Access

# On the Spectrum of Almost Periodic Solution of Second-Order Neutral Delay Differential Equations with Piecewise Constant of Argument

- Li Wang
^{1}Email author and - Chuanyi Zhang
^{1}

**2009**:143175

https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/143175

© L.Wang and C. Zhang. 2009

**Received:**16 December 2008**Accepted:**10 April 2009**Published:**26 May 2009

## Abstract

The spectrum containment of almost periodic solution of second-order neutral delay differential equations with piecewise constant of argument (EPCA, for short) of the form is considered. The main result obtained in this paper is different from that given by some authors for ordinary differential equations (ODE, for short) and clearly shows the differences between ODE and EPCA. Moreover, it is also different from that given for equation because of the difference between and .

## Keywords

- Periodic Solution
- Difference Equation
- Trigonometric Polynomial
- Delay Differential Equation
- Approximation Theorem

## 1. Introduction and Some Preliminaries

Differential equations with piecewise constant argument, which were firstly considered by Cooke and Wiener [1] and Shah and Wiener [2], combine properties of both differential and difference equations and usually describe hybrid dynamical systems and have applications in certain biomedical models in the work of Busenberg and Cooke [3]. Over the years, more attention has been paid to the existence, uniqueness, and spectrum containment of almost periodic solutions of this type of equations (see, e.g., [4–12] and reference there in).

If and are almost periodic, then the module containment property can be characterized in several ways (see [13–16]). For periodic function this inclusion just means that the minimal period of is a multiple of the minimal period of . Some properties of basic frequencies (the base of spectrum) were discussed for almost periodic functions by Cartwright. In [17], Cartwright compared basic frequencies (the base of spectrum) of almost periodic differential equations (ODE) , , with those of its unique almost periodic solution. For scalar equation, , Cartwright's results in [17] implied that the number of basic frequencies of , is the same as that of basic frequencies of its unique solution.

where denotes the greatest integer function, , are nonzero real constants, , , and is almost periodic. In this paper, we investigate the existence, uniqueness, and spectrum containment of almost periodic solutions of (1.1). The main result obtained in this paper is different from that given in [17] for ordinary differential equations (ODE, for short). This clearly shows differences between ODE and EPCA. Moreover, it is also different from that given in [9, 10] for equation . This is due to the difference between and . As well known, both solutions of (1.1) and equation can be constructed by the solutions of corresponding difference equations. However, noticing the difference between and , the solution of difference equation corresponding to the latter can be obtained directly (see [4]), while the solution of difference equation corresponding to the former (i.e., (1.1) cannot be obtained directly. In fact, consists of two parts: and . We will first obtain by solving a difference equation and then obtain from . (Similar technology can be seen in [8].) A detailed account will be given in Section 2.

Now, We give some preliminary notions, definitions, and theorem. Throughout this paper , , and denote the sets of integers, real, and complex numbers, respectively. The following preliminaries can be found in the books, for example, [13–16].

Definition 1.1.

( ) A subset of is said to be relatively dense in if there exists a number such that for all .

is relatively dense for each .

Definition 1.2.

exists, then we call the limit mean of and denote it by .

exists uniformly with respect to . Furthermore, the limit is independent of .

is called the frequency set (or spectrum) of . It is clear that if , then if , for some ; and if , for any . Thus, .

The Approximation Theorem

where is the product of and certain positive number (depending on and ) and .

Definition 1.3.

( ) For a sequence , define and call it sequence interval with length . A subset of is said to be relatively dense in if there exists a positive integer such that for all .

is relatively dense for each .

is called the Bohr spectrum of . Obviously, for almost periodic sequence , if , for some ; if , for any . So,

## 2. The Statement of Main Theorem

We begin this section with a definition of the solution of (1.1).

Definition 2.1.

A continuous function is called a solution of (1.1) if the following conditions are satisfied:

(ii)the one-sided second-order derivatives exist at , .

In [8], the authors pointed out that if is a solution of (1.1), then are continuous at , which guarantees the uniqueness of solution of (1.1) and cannot be omitted.

From the analysis above one sees that if is a solution of (1.1) and , then one gets (2.3) and (2.4). In fact, a solution of (1.1) is constructed by the common solution of (2.3) and (2.4). Moreover, it is clear that consists of two parts: and . can be obtained by solving (2.7), and can be obtained by substituting into (2.5) or (2.6). Without loss of generality, we consider (2.5) only. These will be shown in Lemmas 2.5 and 2.6.

Lemma 2.2.

Lemma 2.3.

Suppose that and , then the roots of polynomial are of moduli different from 1.

Lemma 2.4.

where , and is an identical operator.

The proofs of Lemmas 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 are elementary, and we omit the details.

Lemma 2.5.

Suppose that and , then (2.7) has a unique solution .

Proof.

As the proof of Theorem in [8], define by , where is the Banach space consisting of all bounded sequences in with . It follows from Lemmas 2.2–2.4 that (2.7) has a unique solution .

Substituting into (2.5), we obtain . Easily, we can get . Consequently, the common solution of (2.3) and (2.4) can be obtained. Furthermore, we have that is unique.

Lemma 2.6.

The proof is easy, we omit the details. Since the almost periodic solution of (1.1) is constructed by the common almost periodic solution of (2.3) and (2.4), easily, we have that are continuous at . It must be pointed out that in many works only one of (2.3) and (2.4) is considered while seeking the unique almost periodic solution of (1.1), and it is not true for the continuity of on , consequently, it is not true for the uniqueness (see [8]).

The expressions of and are important in the process of studying the spectrum containment of the almost periodic solution of (1.1). Before giving the main theorem, we list the following assumptions which will be used later.

Our result can be formulated as follows.

Main Theorem

Let and ( ) be satisfied. Then (1.1) has a unique almost periodic solution and . Additionally, if ( ) and ( ) are also satisfied, then , that is, the following spectrum relation holds, where the sum of sets and is defined as .

We postpone the proof of this theorem to the next section.

## 3. The Proof of Main Theorem

To show the Main Theorem, we need some more lemmas.

Lemma 3.1.

Let , then , . If ( ) is satisfied, then , . Furthermore, if ( ) and ( ) are both satisfied, then .

Proof.

Obviously, , , for all . For any , , , thus, we have , .

Thus, and imply and , respectively, .

Easily, we have and , that is, , . By the arbitrariness of , we get and . So,

If ( ) and ( ) are both satisfied, suppose that there exists such that ( ) implies . Moreover, since ( ) holds, we have . leads to , which contradicts with . So, . Noticing that , we have . Similarly, we can get . The proof is completed.

Lemma 3.2.

Suppose that ( ) is satisfied, then . If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, then , where is the unique almost periodic sequence solution of (2.7).

Proof.

Those equalities and Lemma 3.1 imply that and , when ( ) is satisfied. If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, we only need to prove . Suppose that there exists , obviously, , such that From Lemma 3.1, Thus, that is, , which leads to . This contradicts with ( ). Thus, , that is, . Noticing that , so, . The proof is completed.

As mentioned above, the common almost periodic sequence solution of (2.3) and (2.4) consists of two parts: and , where is the unique solution of (2.7), and is obtained by substituting into (2.5). Obviously, . In the following, we give the spectrum containment of .

Lemma 3.3.

Suppose that ( ) is satisfied, then . If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, then .

Proof.

where . If ( ) is satisfied, it follows from Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 that .

If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, supposing there exists , obviously, , such that , that is, Noticing (3.3)–(3.7), this equality is equivalent to that is, . Considering equation , its roots are , , and , obviously, , . We claim that , , that is, this equation has no imaginary root. Otherwise, suppose that and , then by the relationship between roots and coefficient of three-order equation, we know , which leads to a contradiction. Thus ; this contradiction shows . Noticing that , thus, . The proof is completed.

Lemma 3.4.

Suppose that ( ) is satisfied, then . If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, then , where is defined in Lemma 2.6.

Proof.

Since ( ) holds, it follows from Lemmas 3.1–3.3 that we have .

If ( ), ( ), and ( ) are all satisfied, supposing there exists such that it follows from ( ) that . Notice that (3.3)–(3.8), is equivalent to . This equality is equivalent to . Since , that is, this leads to We firstly claim that the equation has no imaginary root, that is, equations and both have no imaginary roots, where . If these two equations have imaginary roots, then , . Since , then or . If the first equation has imaginary roots, then , which contradicts with or . If the second equation has imaginary roots, then , which also contradicts with or . The claim follows. Thus and . Substituting into , we get . This is impossible. Thus, for any , we have that is, . Noticing that , we have . The proof has finished.

In Lemma 2.6, we have given the expression of the almost periodic solution of (1.1) explicitly by a known function . This brings more convenience to study the spectrum containment of almost periodic solution of (1.1). Now, we are in the position to show the Main Theorem.

The proof of Main Theorem

Since ( ) is satisfied, by Lemma 2.6, (1.1) has a unique almost periodic solution satisfying . Thus, for any we have . Since ( ) holds, then . We only need to prove when ( ) is satisfied, and when ( )–( ) are all satisfied.

Therefore, , that is, , which implies .

From the above equality, we have , where, So, . Since , , we have , which is equivalent to . Since , that is, , this leads to . Noticing , it follows from ( that , that is, . From Lemma 3.4, we know that the equation has no imaginary root. Thus , which leads to a contradiction. The claim follows.

The above equality is equivalent to . So, , which implies that , that is, . From the claim above, we get . This completes the proof.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Cooke KL, Wiener J:
**Retarded differential equations with piecewise constant delays.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1984,**99**(1):265–297. 10.1016/0022-247X(84)90248-8MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shah SM, Wiener J:
**Advanced differential equations with piecewise constant argument deviations.***International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences*1983,**6**(4):671–703. 10.1155/S0161171283000599MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Busenberg S, Cooke KL:
**Models of vertically transmitted diseases with sequential-continuous dynamics.**In*Nonlinear Phenomena in Mathematical Sciences*. Edited by: Lakshmikantham V. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1982:179–187.Google Scholar - Seifert G:
**Second-order neutral delay-differential equations with piecewise constant time dependence.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2003,**281**(1):1–9.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Piao DX:
**Almost periodic solutions of neutral differential difference equations with piecewise constant arguments.***Acta Mathematica Sinica*2002,**18**(2):263–276.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li H-X:
**Almost periodic solutions of second-order neutral delay-differential equations with piecewise constant arguments.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2004,**298**(2):693–709. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.05.034MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li H-X:
**Almost periodic weak solutions of neutral delay-differential equations with piecewise constant argument.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2006,**64**(3):530–545. 10.1016/j.na.2005.05.041MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dads EA, Lhachimi L:
**New approach for the existence of pseudo almost periodic solutions for some second order differential equation with piecewise constant argument.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2006,**64**(6):1307–1324. 10.1016/j.na.2005.06.037MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yuan R:
**On the spectrum of almost periodic solution of second order scalar functional differential equations with piecewise constant argument.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2005,**303**(1):103–118. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.06.057MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wang L, Yuan R, Zhang C:
**Corrigendum to: "On the spectrum of almost periodic solution of second order scalar functional differential equations with piecewise constant argument".***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2009,**349**(1):299. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.08.008MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yang X, Yuan R:
**On the module containment of the almost periodic solution for a class of differential equations with piecewise constant delays.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2006,**322**(2):540–555. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.09.036MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yuan R:
**On the spectrum of almost periodic solution of second-order differential equations with piecewise constant argument.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2004,**59**(8):1189–1205.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Corduneanu C:
*Almost Periodic Functions, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, no. 22*. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1968:x+237.Google Scholar - Fink AM:
*Almost Periodic Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics*.*Volume 377*. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1974:viii+336.Google Scholar - Levitan BM, Zhikov VV:
*Almost Periodic Functions and Differential Equations*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1982:xi+211.MATHGoogle Scholar - Zhang C:
*Almost Periodic Type Functions and Ergodicity*. Science Press, Beijing, China; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2003:xii+355.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cartwright ML:
**Almost periodic differential equations and almost periodic flows.***Journal of Differential Equations*1969,**5**(1):167–181. 10.1016/0022-0396(69)90110-7MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yuan R:
**Pseudo-almost periodic solutions of second-order neutral delay differential equations with piecewise constant argument.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2000,**41**(7–8):871–890. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00316-2MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.