Open Access

Existence of Solutions for Nonlinear Fractional Integro-Differential Equations with Three-Point Nonlocal Fractional Boundary Conditions

Advances in Difference Equations20102010:691721

DOI: 10.1155/2010/691721

Received: 17 March 2010

Accepted: 11 June 2010

Published: 4 July 2010


We prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear integro-differential equations of fractional order with three-point nonlocal fractional boundary conditions by applying some standard fixed point theorems.

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus (differentiation and integration of arbitrary order) is proved to be an important tool in the modelling of dynamical systems associated with phenomena such as fractal and chaos. In fact, this branch of calculus has found its applications in various disciplines of science and engineering such as mechanics, electricity, chemistry, biology, economics, control theory, signal and image processing, polymer rheology, regular variation in thermodynamics, biophysics, blood flow phenomena, aerodynamics, electro-dynamics of complex medium, viscoelasticity and damping, control theory, wave propagation, percolation, identification, and fitting of experimental data [14].

Recently, differential equations of fractional order have been addressed by several researchers with the sphere of study ranging from the theoretical aspects of existence and uniqueness of solutions to the analytic and numerical methods for finding solutions. For some recent work on fractional differential equations, see [511] and the references therein.

In this paper, we study the following nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations with three-point nonlocal fractional boundary conditions
where is the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative,  :  is continuous, for  : 

and satisfies the condition Here, is a Banach space and denotes the Banach space of all continuous functions from endowed with a topology of uniform convergence with the norm denoted by

We remark that fractional boundary conditions result in the existence of both electric and magnetic surface currents on the strip and are similar to the impedance boundary conditions with pure imaginary impedance, and in the physical optics approximation, the ratio of the surface currents is the same as for the impedance strip. For the comparison of the physical characteristics of the fractional and impedance strips such as radiation pattern, monostatic radar cross-section, and surface current densities, see [12]. The concept of nonlocal multipoint boundary conditions is quite important in various physical problems of applied nature when the controllers at the end points of the interval (under consideration) dissipate or add energy according to the censors located at intermediate points. Some recent results on nonlocal fractional boundary value problems can be found in [1315].

2. Preliminaries

Let us recall some basic definitions [13] on fractional calculus.

Definition 2.1.

The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order is defined as

provided the integral exists.

Definition 2.2.

The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order for a function is defined by

provided the right-hand side is pointwise defined on

Lemma 2.3 (see [16]).

For let . Then

where ( is the smallest integer such that ).

Lemma 2.4 (see [2]).

Let . Then


Lemma 2.5.

For a given the unique solution of the boundary value problem
is given by


In view of Lemma 2.3, the fractional differential equation in (2.4) is equivalent to the integral equation
where are arbitrary constants. Applying the boundary conditions for (2.4), we find that and

Substituting the values of and in (2.6), we obtain (2.5). This completes the proof.

3. Main Results

To establish the main results, we need the following assumptions.
  • (A1) There exist positive functions such that
  • (A2) There exists a number such that , where

  • (A3) for all

Theorem 3.1.

Assume that is a jointly continuous function and satisfies the assumption Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has a unique solution provided , where is given in the assumption .


Define by
Let us set and choose
where is such that Now we show that where For we have
Now, for and for each we obtain

where we have used the assumption . As therefore is a contraction. Thus, the conclusion of the theorem follows by the contraction mapping principle.

Now, we state Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem [17] which is needed to prove the following result to prove the existence of at least one solution of (1.1).

Theorem 3.2.

Let be a closed convex and nonempty subset of a Banach space Let be the operators such that (i) whenever ; (ii) is compact and continuous; (iii) is a contraction mapping. Then there exists such that

Theorem 3.3.

Let be jointly continuous, and the assumptions and hold with

Then there exists at least one solution of the boundary value problem (1.1) on


Let us fix
and consider We define the operators and on as
For we find that

Thus, It follows from the assumption that is a contraction mapping for

In order to prove that is compact and continuous, we follow the approach used in [6, 7]. Continuity of implies that the operator is continuous. Also, is uniformly bounded on as
Now, we show that is equicontinuous. Since is bounded on the compact set , therefore, we define . Consequently, for , we have

which is independent of So, is relatively compact on . Hence, By Arzela-Ascoli's Theorem, is compact on . Thus all the assumptions of Theorem 3.2 are satisfied and the conclusion of Theorem 3.2 implies that the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least one solution on

Example 3.

Consider the following boundary value problem:
Here, With we find that

Thus, by Theorem 3.1, the boundary value problem (3.14) has a unique solution on

4. Conclusions

This paper studies the existence and uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear integro-differential equations of fractional order with three-point nonlocal fractional boundary conditions involving the fractional derivative . Our results are based on a generalized variant of Lipschitz condition given in , that is, there exist positive functions and such that
In case , and are constant functions, that is, , and ( and are positive real numbers), then Lipschitz-generalized variant reduces to the classical Lipschitz condition and in the assumption takes the form
In the limit , our results correspond to a second-order integro-differential equation with fractional boundary conditions:



The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful review of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University


  1. Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Gordon and Breach Science, Yverdon, Switzerland; 1993:xxxvi+976.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 198. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA; 1999:xxiv+340.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Volume 204. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2006:xvi+523.Google Scholar
  4. Sabatier J, Agrawal OP, Machad JAT (Eds): Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2007:xiv+552.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Daftardar-Gejji V, Bhalekar S: Boundary value problems for multi-term fractional differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,345(2):754-765. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.065MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. N'Guérékata GM: A Cauchy problem for some fractional abstract differential equation with non local conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,70(5):1873-1876. 10.1016/ ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Mophou GM, N'Guérékata GM: On integral solutions of some nonlocal fractional differential equations with nondense domain. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,71(10):4668-4675. 10.1016/ ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakshmikantham V, Leela S, Devi JV: Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems. Cambridge Academic Publishers, Cambridge, UK; 2009.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Gafiychuk V, Datsko B: Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diffusion systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2010,59(3):1101-1107. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.05.013MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Mophou GM: Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to impulsive fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2010,72(3-4):1604-1615. 10.1016/ ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Ahmad B: Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Applied Mathematics Letters 2010,23(4):390-394. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.11.004MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Veliev EI, Ivakhnychenko MV, Ahmedov TM: scattering properties of the strip with fractional boundary conditions and comparison with the impedance strip. Progress In Electromagnetics Research C 2008, 2: 189-205.Google Scholar
  13. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence of solutions for nonlocal boundary value problems of higher-order nonlinear fractional differential equations. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2009, 2009:-9.Google Scholar
  14. Ahmad B, Graef JR: Coupled systems of nonlinear fractional differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions. PanAmerican Mathematical Journal 2009,19(3):29-39.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations with three-point boundary conditions. Computers & Mathematics with Applicationsl 2009,58(9):1838-1843. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.091MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Bai Z, Lü H: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005,311(2):495-505. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.052MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Smart DR: Fixed Point Theorems. Cambridge University Press, London, UK; 1980:viii+93.MATHGoogle Scholar


© A. Alsaedi and B. Ahmad. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.