Open Access

A Functional Inequality in Restricted Domains of Banach Modules

Advances in Difference Equations20092009:973709

DOI: 10.1155/2009/973709

Received: 28 April 2009

Accepted: 16 August 2009

Published: 8 October 2009

Abstract

We investigate the stability problem for the following functional inequality on restricted domains of Banach modules over a -algebra. As an application we study the asymptotic behavior of a generalized additive mapping.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The following question concerning the stability of group homomorphisms was posed by Ulam [1]: Under what conditions does there exist a group homomorphism near an approximate group homomorphism?

Hyers [2] considered the case of approximately additive mappings , where and are Banach spaces and satisfiesHyers inequality

(11)

for all .

In 1950, Aoki [3] provided a generalization of the Hyers' theorem for additive mappings and in 1978, Rassias [4] generalized the Hyers' theorem for linear mappings by allowing the Cauchy difference to be unbounded (see also [5]). The result of Rassias' theorem has been generalized by Forti [6, 7] and G vruta [8] who permitted the Cauchy difference to be bounded by a general control function. During the last three decades a number of papers have been published on the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability to a number of functional equations and mappings (see [923]). We also refer the readers to the books [2428].

Throughout this paper, let be a unital -algebra with unitary group , unit and norm . Assume that is a left -module and is a left Banach -module. An additive mapping is called -linear if for all and all . In this paper, we investigate the stability problem for the following functional inequality:

(12)

on restricted domains of Banach modules over a -algebra, where are nonzero positive real numbers. As an application we study the asymptotic behavior of a generalized additive mapping.

2. Solutions of the Functional Inequality (1.2)

Theorem 2.1.

Let and be left -modules and let be nonzero real numbers. If a mapping with satisfies the functional inequality
(21)

for all and all , then is -linear.

Proof.

Letting in (2.1) we get
(22)
for all and all . Letting (resp., ) in (2.2), we get
(23)

for all and all . Hence and it follows from (2.2) and (2.3) that and for all and all Therefore for all Hence for all and all rational numbers .

Now let and let be an integer number with . Then by Theorem  1 of [29], there exist elements such that . Since is additive and for all all rational numbers and all , we have
(24)
for all . Replacing instead of in the above equation, we have
(25)

for all Since is an arbitrary nonzero element in in the previous paragraph, one can replace instead of in (2.5). Thus we have for all and all So is -linear.

The following theorem is another version of Theorem 2.1 on a restricted domain when

Theorem 2.2.

Let and be left -modules and let be nonzero positive real numbers. Assume that a mapping satisfies and the functional inequality (2.1) for all with and all . Then is -linear.

Proof.

Letting with in (2.1), we get
(26)
for all . Let and let Then
(27)
Therefore replacing and by and in (2.6), respectively, we get
(28)

for all with and all .

Similar to the proof of Theorem  3 of [30] (see also [31]), we prove that satisfies (2.8) for all and all . Suppose If , let with otherwise
(29)
Since it is easy to verify that
(210)
Therefore
(211)

Hence satisfies (2.8) and we infer that satisfies (2.2) for all and all . By Theorem 2.1, is -linear.

3. Generalized Hyers-Ulam Stability of (1.2) on a Restricted Domain

In this section, we investigate the stability problem for -linear mappings associated to the functional inequality (1.2) on a restricted domain. For convenience, we use the following abbreviation for a given function and

(31)

for all

Theorem 3.1.

Let and be given. Assume that a mapping satisfies the functional inequality
(32)
for all with and all . Then there exist a unique -linear mapping and a constant such that
(33)

for all

Proof.

Let with . Then (3.2) implies that
(34)
Thus
(35)
for all with and all . Let and let Then Therefore it follows from (3.5) that
(36)
for all with and all . For the case let be an element of which is defined in the proof of Theorem 2.2. It is clear that Using (2.11) and (3.6), we get
(37)
for all with and all . Hence
(38)
for all and all , where
(39)
Letting and in (3.8), respectively, we get
(310)
for all and all . It follows from (3.8) and (3.10) that
(311)
for all . By the results of Hyers [2] and Rassias [4], there exists a unique additive mapping given by such that
(312)

for all . It follows from the definition of and (3.2) that and for all with and all . Hence is -linear by Theorem 2.2.

We apply the result of Theorem 3.1 to study the asymptotic behavior of a generalized additive mapping. An asymptotic property of additive mappings has been proved by Skof [32] (see also [30, 33]).

Corollary 3.2.

Let be nonzero positive real numbers. Assume that a mapping with satisfies
(313)

for all then is -linear.

Proof.

It follows from (3.13) that there exists a sequence monotonically decreasing to zero, such that
(314)
for all with and all . Therefore
(315)
for all with and all . Applying (3.15) and Theorem 3.1, we obtain a sequence of unique -linear mappings satisfying
(316)
for all . Since the sequence is monotonically decreasing, we conclude
(317)

for all and all The uniqueness of implies for all Hence letting in (3.16), we obtain that is -linear.

The following theorem is another version of Theorem 3.1 for the case

Theorem 3.3.

Let be given and let be nonzero real numbers. Assume that a mapping with satisfies the functional inequality
(318)
for all with and all . Then there exists a unique -linear mapping such that
(319)

for all with and .

Proof.

Letting in (3.18), we get
(320)
for all with and all . Hence
(321)
for all with and all . It follows from (3.21) that
(322)
for all with and all . Adding (3.21) to (3.22), we get
(323)
for all with and all . Therefore
(324)
for all with . Let with . We may put in (3.24) to obtain
(325)
We can replace by in (3.25) for all nonnegative integers Then using a similar argument given in [4], we have
(326)
Hence we have the following inequality:
(327)
for all with and all integers Since is complete, (3.27) shows that the limit exists for all with . Letting and in (3.27), we obtain that satisfies inequality (3.19) for all with . It follows from the definition of and (3.24) that
(328)
for all with . Hence
(329)
for all with . We extend the additivity of to the whole space by using an extension method of Skof [34]. Let and be given with Let be the smallest integer such that We define the mapping by
(330)
Let be given with and let be the smallest integer such that Then is the smallest integer satisfying If , we have and . Therefore For the case , it follows from the definition of that
(331)
From the definition of and (3.29), we get that holds true for all Let and let be an integer such that Then
(332)
It remains to prove that is -linear. Let and let be a positive integer such that Since for all and satisfies (3.28), we have
(333)

Hence is additive. Since for all , we have from (3.22) that for all and all Letting , we get . Therefore for all and all This proves that is -linear. Also, satisfies inequality (3.19) for all with , by the definition of .

For the case we use the Gajda's example [35] to give the following counterexample.

Example 3.4.

Let be defined by
(334)
Consider the function by the formula
(335)
It is clear that is continuous, bounded by on and
(336)
for all (see [35]). It follows from (3.36) that the following inequality:
(337)
holds for all First we show that
(338)
for all If satisfies (3.38) for all then satisfies (3.38) for all To see this, let (the result is obvious when ). Then for all Replacing by , we get that for all Hence we may assume that If or then
(339)
Now suppose that Then there exists an integer such that
(340)
Therefore
(341)
Hence
(342)
for all From the definition of and (3.40), we have
(343)
Therefore satisfies (3.38). Now we prove that
(344)
for all and all where
(345)
It follows from (3.37) and (3.38) that
(346)
for all and all Thus satisfies inequality (3.18) for Let be a linear functional such that
(347)
for all where is a positive constant. Then there exists a constant such that for all rational numbers . So we have
(348)
for all rational numbers . Let with If , then for all So
(349)

which contradicts (3.48).

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The third author was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2009-0070788). The authors would like to thank the referees for a number of valuable suggestions regarding a previous version of this paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Hanyang University

References

  1. Ulam SM: A Collection of the Mathematical Problems. Interscience, New York, NY, USA; 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1941, 27: 222-224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki T: On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 1950, 2: 64-66. 10.2969/jmsj/00210064MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Rassias ThM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1978, 72: 297-300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourgin DG: Classes of transformations and bordering transformations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 1951, 57: 223-237. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1951-09511-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Forti GL: An existence and stability theorem for a class of functional equations. Stochastica 1980, 4: 23-30. 10.1080/17442508008833155MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Forti GL: Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations in several variables. Aequationes Mathematicae 1995,50(1-2):143-190. 10.1007/BF01831117MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Gavruta P: A generalization of the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of approximately additive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1994,184(3):431-436. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1211MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Cholewa PW: Remarks on the stability of functional equations. Aequationes Mathematicae 1984,27(1):76-86. 10.1007/BF02192660MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Czerwik S: On the stability of the quadratic mapping in normed spaces. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 1992,62(1):59-64. 10.1007/BF02941618MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Faiziev VA, Rassias ThM, Sahoo PK:The space of -additive mappings on semigroups. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 2002,354(11):4455-4472. 10.1090/S0002-9947-02-03036-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Grabiec A: The generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of a class of functional equations. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen 1996,48(3-4):217-235.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyers DH, Rassias ThM: Approximate homomorphisms. Aequationes Mathematicae 1992,44(2-3):125-153. 10.1007/BF01830975MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Isac G, Rassias ThM:Stability of -additive mappings: applications to nonlinear analysis. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 1996, 19: 219-228. 10.1155/S0161171296000324MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Jun K-W, Lee Y-H: On the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a pexiderized quadratic inequality. Mathematical Inequalities and Applications 2001,4(1):93-118.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kannappan Pl: Quadratic functional equation and inner product spaces. Results in Mathematics 1995, 27: 368-372.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Najati A: Hyers-Ulam stability of an n-apollonius type quadratic mapping. Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society—Simon Stevin 2007,14(4):755-774.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Najati A, Park C: Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of homomorphisms in quasi-Banach algebras associated to the Pexiderized Cauchy functional equation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,335(2):763-778. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.02.009MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Najati A, Park C:The Pexiderized Apollonius-Jensen type additive mapping and isomorphisms between -algebras. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2008,14(5):459-479. 10.1080/10236190701466546MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Park C-G: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach modules. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2002,275(2):711-720. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00386-4MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rassias ThM: On a modified Hyers-Ulam sequence. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1991,158(1):106-113. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90270-AMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Rassias ThM: On the stability of functional equations and a problem of Ulam. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 2000, 62: 23-130. 10.1023/A:1006499223572MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Rassias ThM: On the stability of functional equations in Banach spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2000,251(1):264-284. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7046MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Aczél J, Dhombres J: Functional Equations in Several Variables. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1989.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Czerwik S: Functional Equations and Inequalities in Several Variables. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA; 2002.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias ThM: Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland; 1998.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Jung S: Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Mathematical Analysis. Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Fla, USA; 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Rassias ThM: Functional Equations, Inequalities and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2003.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Kadison RV, Pedersen G: Means and convex combinations of unitary operators. Mathematica Scandinavica 1985, 57: 249-266.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Jung S-MO: Hyers-ulam-rassias stability of jensen's equation and its application. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1998,126(11):3137-3143. 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04680-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Jung S, Moslehian MS, Sahoo PK: Stability of a generalized Jensen equation on restricted domains. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511320v1
  32. Skof F:Sull' approssimazione delle applicazioni localmente -additive. Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 1983, 117: 377-389.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias ThM: On the asymptoticity aspect of Hyers-Ulam stability of mappings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1998,126(2):425-430. 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04060-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Skof F: On the stability of functional equations on a restricted domain and a related topic. In Stabiliy of Mappings of Hyers-Ulam Type. Edited by: Rassias ThM, Tabor J. Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Fla, USA; 1994:41-151.Google Scholar
  35. Gajda Z: On stability of additive mappings. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 1991, 14: 431-434. 10.1155/S016117129100056XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© M.B. Moghimi et al. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.