Open Access

On Boundedness of Solutions of the Difference Equation for

Advances in Difference Equations20092009:463169

DOI: 10.1155/2009/463169

Received: 4 February 2009

Accepted: 2 June 2009

Published: 5 July 2009

Abstract

We study the boundedness of the difference equation , where and the initial values . We show that the solution of this equation converges to if or for all ; otherwise is unbounded. Besides, we obtain the set of all initial values such that the positive solutions of this equation are bounded, which answers the open problem 6.10.12 proposed by Kulenović and Ladas (2002).

1. Introduction

In this paper, we study the following difference equation:
(1.1)

where with and the initial values .

The global behavior of (1.1) for the case is certainly folklore. It can be found, for example, in [1] (see also a precise result in [2,]).

The global stability of (1.1) for the case follows from the main result in [3] (see also Lemma 1 in Stević's paper [4]). Some generalizations of Copson's result can be found, for example, in papers [58]. Some more sophisticated results, such as finding the asymptotic behavior of solutions of (1.1) for the case (even when ) can be found, for example, in papers [4](see also [811]). Some other properties of (1.1) have been also treated in [4].

The case was treated for the first time by Stević's in paper [12]. The main trick from [12] has been later used with a success for many times; see, for example, [1315].

Some existing results for (1.1) are summarized as follows[16].

Theorem 1 A.

If , then the zero equilibrium of (1.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

If , then the equilibrium of (1.1) is globally asymptotically stable.

If , then every positive solution of (1.1) converges to the positive equilibrium .

If , then every positive solution of (1.1) converges to a period-two solution.

If , then (1.1) has unbounded solutions.

In [16], Kulenović and Ladas proposed the following open problem.

Open problem B (see Open problem 6.10.12of [16])

Assume that .
  1. (a)

    Find the set of all initial conditions such that the solutions of (1.1) are bounded.

     
  2. (b)

    Let . Investigate the asymptotic behavior of .

     

In this paper, we will obtain the following results: let with , and let be a positive solution of (1.1) with the initial values . If for all (or for all ), then converges to . Otherwise is unbounded.

For closely related results see [1734].

2. Some Definitions and Lemmas

In this section, let and be the positive equilibrium of (1.1). Write and define by, for all ,
(2.1)
It is easy to see that if is a solution of (1.1), then for any . Let
(2.2)

Then . The proof of Lemma 2.1 is quite similar to that of Lemma 1 in [35] and hence is omitted.

Lemma 2.1.

The following statements are true.
  1. (1)

    is a homeomorphism.

     
  2. (2)

    and .

     
  3. (3)

    and .

     
  4. (4)

    and .

     
  5. (5)

    and .

     

Lemma 2.2.

Let , and let be a positive solution of (1.1).
  1. (1)

    If and , then .

     
  2. (2)

    If and , then .

     

Proof.

We show only (1) because the proof of (2) follows from (1) by using the change and the fact that (1) is autonomous. Since and , by (1.1) we have
(2.3)
Also it follows from (1.1) that
(2.4)

from which we have and . This completes the proof.

Lemma 2.3.

Let , and let be a positive solution of (1.1) with the initial values . If there exists some such that , then .

Proof.

Since , it follows from Lemma 2.1 that for any . Without loss of generality we may assume that , that is, . Now we show Suppose for the sake of contradiction that , then
(2.5)
(2.6)
By (2.5) we have
(2.7)
and by (2.6) we get
(2.8)

Claim 1.

If , then
(2.9)

Proof of Claim 1

Let , then we have
(2.10)
Since , it follows
(2.11)

This completes the proof of Claim 1.

By (2.8), we have
(2.12)
or
(2.13)

Claim 2.

We have
(2.14)
(2.15)

Proof of Claim 2

Since
(2.16)
we have
(2.17)

The proof of (2.14) is completed.

Now we show (2.15). Let
(2.18)
Note that ; it follows that if , then
(2.19)
which implies that is decreasing for . Since and
(2.20)
it follows that
(2.21)
Thus
(2.22)
This implies that
(2.23)
Finally we have
(2.24)

The proof of (2.15) is completed.

Note that since . By (2.12), (2.13), (2.14), and (2.15), we see which contradicts to (2.7). The proof of Lemma 2.3 is completed.

3. Main Results

In this section, we investigate the boundedness of solutions of (1.1). Let , and let be a positive solution of (1.1) with the initial values , then we see that for some or for all or for all .

Theorem 3.1.

Let , and let be a positive solution of (1.1) such that for all or for all , then converges to .

Proof.

Case 1.

for any . If for some , then
(3.1)
If for some , then
(3.2)
which implies that and
(3.3)
Thus for any . In similar fashion, we can show for any . Let and , then
(3.4)

which implies .

Case 2.

for any . Since is decreasing in , it follows that for any
(3.5)

In similar fashion, we can show that . This completes the proof.

Lemma 3.2 (see [20, Theorem 5]).

Let be a set, and let be a function which decreases in and increases in , then for every positive solution of equation , and do exactly one of the following.
  1. (1)

    They are both monotonically increasing.

     
  2. (2)

    They are both monotonically decreasing.

     
  3. (3)

    Eventually, one of them is monotonically increasing, and the other is monotonically decreasing.

     

Remark 3.3.

Using arguments similar to ones in the proof of Lemma 3.2, Stevi proved Theorem 2 in [25]. Beside this, this trick have been used by Stević in [18, 28, 29].

Theorem 3.4.

Let , and let be a positive solution of (1.1) such that for some , then is unbounded.

Proof.

We may assume without loss of generality that and (the proof for is similar). From Lemma 2.1 we see for all .If is eventually increasing, then it follows from Lemma 2.3 that is eventually increasing. Thus and , it follows from Lemma 2.2 that .

If is not eventually increasing, then there exists some such that
(3.6)

from which we obtain , since and .

Since is increasing in and is decreasing in , we have that for any . It follows from Lemma 3.2 that is eventually decreasing. Thus and . It follows from Lemma 2.2 that . This completes the proof.

By Theorems 3.1 and 3.4 we have the following.

Corollary 3.5.

Let , and let be a positive bounded solution of (1.1), then for all or for all .

Now one can find out the set of all initial values such that the positive solutions of (1.1) are bounded. Let For any let
(3.7)
It follows from Lemma 2.1 that , which implies
(3.8)

for any .

Let be the set of all initial values such that the positive solutions of (1.1) are bounded. Then we have the following theorem.

Theorem 3.6.

.

Proof.

Let be a positive solution of (1.1) with the initial values .

If , then for any , which implies for any . It follows from Theorem 3.1 that .

If , then , which implies for any . It follows from Theorem 3.1 that .

Now assume that is a positive solution of (1.1) with the initial values .

If , then it follows from Lemma 2.1 that , which along with Theorem 3.4 implies that is unbounded.

If , then there exists such that . Thus . By Lemma 2.1, we obtain and , which along with Theorem 3.4 implies that is unbounded.

If , then there exists such that and . Again by Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 3.4, we have that is unbounded. This completes the proof.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

Project Supported by NNSF of China (10861002) and NSF of Guangxi (0640205, 0728002).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Guangxi University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Guangxi College of Finance and Economics

References

  1. Tasković MR: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Vol. I: Fundamental Elements of Theory. Zavod, za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd, Serbia; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Stević S: Behavior of the positive solutions of the generalized Beddington-Holt equation. PanAmerican Mathematical Journal 2000,10(4):77-85.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Copson ET: On a generalisation of monotonic sequences. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society. Series 2 1970, 17: 159-164. 10.1017/S0013091500009433MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Stević S: Asymptotic behavior of a sequence defined by iteration with applications. Colloquium Mathematicum 2002,93(2):267-276. 10.4064/cm93-2-6MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stević S: A note on bounded sequences satisfying linear inequalities. Indian Journal of Mathematics 2001,43(2):223-230.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Stević S: A generalization of the Copson's theorem concerning sequences which satisfy a linear inequality. Indian Journal of Mathematics 2001,43(3):277-282.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Stević S: A global convergence result. Indian Journal of Mathematics 2002,44(3):361-368.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Stević S:A note on the recursive sequence . Ukrainian Mathematical Journal 2003,55(4):691-697.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Stević S:On the recursive sequence . Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 2002,6(3):405-414.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Stević S: Asymptotics of some classes of higher-order difference equations. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2007, 2007:-20.Google Scholar
  11. Stević S: Existence of nontrivial solutions of a rational difference equation. Applied Mathematics Letters 2007,20(1):28-31. 10.1016/j.aml.2006.03.002MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stević S:On the recursive sequence . Applied Mathematics Letters 2002, 15: 305-308. 10.1016/S0893-9659(01)00135-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Berenhaut KS, Dice JE, Foley JD, Iričanin B, Stević S:Periodic solutions of the rational difference equation . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(2):183-189. 10.1080/10236190500539295MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Stević S: Periodic character of a class of difference equation. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2004,10(6):615-619. 10.1080/10236190410001682103MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Stević S:On the difference equation . Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete & Impulsive Systems 2007,14(3):459-463.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Kulenović MRS, Ladas G: Dynamics of Second Order Rational Difference Equations, with Open Problems and Conjectures. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 2002:xii+218.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Amleh AM, Grove EA, Ladas G, Georgiou DA:On the recursive sequence . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1999,233(2):790-798. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6346MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Berenhaut KS, Stević S:The behaviour of the positive solutions of the difference equation . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(9):909-918. 10.1080/10236190600836377MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Camouzis E, Ladas G: When does periodicity destroy boundedness in rational equations? Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(9):961-979. 10.1080/10236190600822369MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Camouzis E, Ladas G: When does local asymptotic stability imply global attractivity in rational equations? Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(8):863-885. 10.1080/10236190600772663MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Devault R, Kocic VL, Stutson D:Global behavior of solutions of the nonlinear difference equation . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2005,11(8):707-719. 10.1080/10236190500137405MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Feuer J:On the behavior of solutions of . Applicable Analysis 2004,83(6):599-606. 10.1080/00036810410001657260MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kulenović MRS, Ladas G, Prokup NR:On the recursive sequence . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2000,6(5):563-576. 10.1080/10236190008808246MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Stević S: Asymptotic behavior of a nonlinear difference equation. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 2003,34(12):1681-1687.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Stević S:On the recursive sequence . II. Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete & Impulsive Systems. Series A 2003,10(6):911-916.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Stević S:On the recursive sequence . Journal of Applied Mathematics & Computing 2005,18(1-2):229-234. 10.1007/BF02936567MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Stević S:On the recursive sequence . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2007,13(1):41-46. 10.1080/10236190601069325MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Stević S:On the difference equation . Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2008,56(5):1159-1171. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.017MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Stević S, Berenhaut KS: The behavior of positive solutions of a nonlinear second-order difference equation. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2008, 2008:-8.Google Scholar
  30. Sun T, Xi H: Global asymptotic stability of a family of difference equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005,309(2):724-728. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.040MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun T, Xi H, Chen Z: Global asymptotic stability of a family of nonlinear recursive sequences. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2005,11(13):1165-1168. 10.1080/10236190500296516MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun T, Xi H:On the system of rational difference equations . Advances in Difference Equations 2006, 2006:-8.Google Scholar
  33. Sun T, Xi H, Hong L:On the system of rational difference equations . Advances in Difference Equations 2006, 2006:-7.Google Scholar
  34. Xi H, Sun T: Global behavior of a higher-order rational difference equation. Advances in Difference Equations 2006, 2006:-7.Google Scholar
  35. Sun T, Xi H:On the basin of attraction of the two cycle of the difference equation . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2007,13(10):945-952. 10.1080/10236190701388435MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hongjian Xi et al. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.