Skip to main content

A stochastic SIR epidemic model with Lévy jump and media coverage


A stochastic susceptible–infectious–recovered epidemic model with temporary immunity and media coverage is proposed. The effects of Lévy jumps on the dynamics of the model are considered. A unique global positive solution for the epidemic model is obtained. Sufficient conditions are derived to guarantee that the epidemic disease is extinct and persistent in the mean. The threshold behavior is discussed. Numerical simulations are given to verify our theoretical results.


Epidemics have a huge impact on human life, and controlling and eradicating infectious diseases have been a vital problem that needs to be urgently solved in eco-epidemiology research. Mathematical modeling has become an important tool in analyzing the spread and control of infectious diseases. In implementing measures for preventing the spread of diseases, educating people about the correct preventions of diseases through mass media and other platforms at the first opportunity is particularly important [1]. The coverage of epidemics in the media, such as through television, newspaper, and online networks, gives an overview of the risk level and the relative need for precautions in risk areas and encourages the public to take precautionary measures, such as wearing masks, avoiding public places, and frequent hand washing [2]. Thus, in the past few years, many epidemic models integrating the effects of media coverage have been presented and analyzed [311].

Temporary immunity is another important phenomenon in the transmission of epidemic diseases, such as influenza, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Salmonella infection [12]. In the case of temporary immunity, an individual gets a fleeting immunity to a disease after recovery and then becomes susceptible again after some period. For example, after recovery from influenza, there is a long immunity to the same strain of the disease but no immunity against other strains. Many scholars have also paid close attention to the effects of temporary disease immunity on epidemic models [1318]; however, only a few have considered the effects of media coverage and temporary immunity simultaneously.

On the basis of the aforementioned discussion, a deterministic susceptible–infectious–recovered (SIR) model that considered media coverage and temporary immunity is proposed as follows:

$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} \frac{\mathrm{d}S}{\mathrm{d}t}= \varLambda -\mu S(t)- (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)+ \gamma I(t- \tau )e^{-\mu \tau }, \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}I}{\mathrm{d}t}= (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)-(\mu +\gamma )I(t), \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}R}{\mathrm{d}t}= \gamma I(t)-\gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau }-\mu R(t), \end{cases} $$

where Λ is the recruitment rate, μ denotes the natural death rate, and γ is the treatment rate. \(\tau >0\) is the length of temporary immunity period, which denotes the time from recovery to becoming susceptible again. The term \(I(t-\tau )e^{- \mu \tau }\) reflects the fact that an individual has survived from natural death in a recovery pool before becoming susceptible again [13]. \(\beta =\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I(t)}{ \alpha +I(t)}\) denotes the effective contact rate, here, \(\beta _{1}\) represents the maximal effective contact rate between susceptible and infected individuals, \(\frac{\beta _{2}I(t)}{\alpha +I(t)}\) is the maximal reduced effective contact rate as influenced by mass media alert [5, 6]. \(\alpha >0\) is the effect of media coverage on contact transmission, and \(\beta _{1}>\beta _{2}\).

On the other hand, epidemic models are inevitably subject to environmental noise and it is necessary to reveal how the environmental noise affects the epidemic model. In the natural world, there are various types of random noises, such as the famous white noise, Lévy jump noise which considers the motivation that the continuity of solutions may be broken under severe environmental perturbations, such as avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, hurricanes [1921] and a jump process should be introduced to prevent and control diseases, and so on. In this paper, we extend the deterministic system (1.1) to the Brown motion with Lévy jumps, \(J(t)=\int _{0}^{t}\int _{\mathbf{Y}}\gamma (u) \tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}s,\mathrm{d}u)\), and mainly consider its effects on the effective contact rate parameter \(\beta =\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I}\) such that

$$ \beta \rightarrow \beta +\sigma \dot{B}(t)+\dot{J}(t). $$

Considering the effects of temporary immunity and media coverage on a stochastic susceptible–infectious–recovered (SIR) epidemic model driven by Lévy noise:

$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} {\mathrm{d}}S= [\varLambda -\mu S(t)- (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)+ \gamma I(t- \tau )e^{-\mu \tau } ]\, {\mathrm{d}}t \\ \hphantom{{\mathrm{d}}S= {}} {} - (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t) ( \sigma \, {\mathrm{d}}B(t)+ \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\gamma (u)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) ) , \\ {\mathrm{d}}I= [ (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)-(\mu +\gamma )I(t) ]\, {\mathrm{d}}t+ (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t) (\sigma \, { \mathrm{d}}B(t) \\ \hphantom{{\mathrm{d}}I={}} {}+ \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\gamma (u)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) ) , \\ {\mathrm{d}}R= [\gamma I(t)-\gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau }-\mu R(t) ]\, {\mathrm{d}}t. \end{cases} $$

The initial conditions are

$$ \begin{aligned} &S(0)=S_{0}\geq 0,\qquad I(\xi )=\phi _{1}(\xi )\geq 0, \\ &\phi _{1}(0)>0,\quad \xi \in [-\tau ,0], \phi _{1}\in C \bigl([-\tau ,0]; \mathbb{R} _{+} \bigr), \end{aligned} $$

where \(\tau >0\) is the length of the temporary immunity period, which covers the time from recovery phase to being the susceptible ones again; and \(\sigma ^{2}(t)\) denotes the intensity of white noise. \(B(t)\) is a standard Brownian motion that is defined on a complete probability space \((\varOmega ,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})\) with filtration \(\{\mathcal{F}_{t} \}_{t\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\) satisfying the usual conditions (\(\{ \mathcal{F}_{t}\}_{t\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\) is right continuous and increasing while \(\mathcal{F}_{0}\) contains all \(\mathbb{P}\)-null sets) [2226]. N is a Poisson counting measure with compensator Ñ and characteristic measure λ on a measurable subset Y of \((0,\infty )\) which satisfies \(\lambda (\mathbf{Y})<\infty \); λ is assumed to be a Lévy measure, such that \(\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u)=N( \mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u)-\lambda \tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}u)\,\mathrm{d}t\); \(\gamma : \mathbf{Y}\times \varOmega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is bounded and continuous with respect to λ and is \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbf{Y}) \times \mathcal{F}_{t}\)-measurable, where \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbf{Y})\) is a σ-algebra with respect to the set Y. In this paper, B and N are assumed to be independent of each other.

As the first two equations of models (1.2) do not depend on the third one, then the following equations should be considered:

$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} {\mathrm{d}}S= [\varLambda -\mu S(t)- (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)+ \gamma I(t- \tau )e^{-\mu \tau } ]\, {\mathrm{d}}t \\ \hphantom{{\mathrm{d}}S={}} {} - (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t) ( \sigma\, {\mathrm{d}}B(t)+ \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\gamma (u)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) ) , \\ {\mathrm{d}}I= [ (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t)-(\mu +\gamma )I(t) ]\, {\mathrm{d}}t+ (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} )S(t)I(t) (\sigma \, { \mathrm{d}}B(t) \\ \hphantom{{\mathrm{d}}I={}} {}+ \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\gamma (u)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) ). \end{cases} $$

Moreover, we make the following assumption.

Assumption (H1)

\(\gamma (u)\) is a bounded function, \(1+\gamma (u)>0\) and \(|\frac{\varLambda }{\mu }\gamma (u)|\leq \delta \), \(u\in \mathbf{Y}\).

Remark 1

This assumption means that the intensities of Lévy noises are not infinite.

The outline of this paper is as follows. In Sect. 2, a unique positive solution for system (1.4) is obtained. The conditions are derived for the extinction and persistence in the mean of diseases. The threshold behavior is obtained and discussed. In Sect. 3, some numerical simulations are presented to verify our theoretical results of system (1.4).

Main results

Existence and uniqueness of the global solution

In the following, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution of system (1.4).

Theorem 2.1

If Assumption (H1)holds, then, for any initial value\((S(0), I(0))\in L^{1}([-\tau ,0]; \mathbb{R}^{2}_{+})\), a unique solution\((S(t), I(t))\in \mathbb{R}^{2}_{+}\)of system (1.4) exists on\(t\geq -\tau \)and the solution will remain in\(\mathbb{R} ^{2}_{+}\)with probability one.


According to the local Lipschitz condition of system (1.4), we see that, for any initial value \(X_{0}=(S(0), I(0))\in \mathbb{R}^{2}_{+}\), a unique local solution \((S(t), I(t))\) exists on \([-\tau , \tau _{e})\), herein, \(\tau _{e}\) represents the explosion time. To prove that the solution is global, one is required to obtain \(\tau _{e}=\infty \) a.s. Then we suppose that \(k_{0}\geq 1\) is sufficiently large such that \(S(0)\) and \(I(0)\) lie within the interval \([1/k_{0},k_{0}]\). For each integer \(k>k_{0}\), we define the stopping time \(\tau _{k} =\inf \{t \in [-\tau ,\tau _{e}]: S(t) {\notin }(1/k,k), \text{or } I(t) {\notin }(1/k,k)\}\). Then \(\tau _{k}\) increases as \(k\rightarrow \infty \). Denote \(\tau _{\infty }={\lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty }}\tau _{k}\), thus \(\tau _{\infty }\leq \tau _{e}\). In the following, we need to show that \(\tau _{\infty }=\infty \). If not, there are constants \(T>0\) and \(\varepsilon \in (0,1)\) satisfying \({P}\{\tau _{\infty }<\infty \}>\varepsilon \). Thus, an integer \(k_{1}\geq k_{0}\) exists such that \({P}\{\tau _{k}\leq T\}\geq \varepsilon \), for all \(k>k_{1}\). Construct a \(C^{2}\)-function \(V: \mathbb{R}_{+}^{2}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{+}\) by

$$ V(S,I)= \biggl(S-a-a\ln \frac{S}{a} \biggr)+(I-1-\ln I)+\gamma e^{- \mu \tau } \int _{t-\tau }^{t}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s, $$

where a is a constant that will be given later. By virtue of Itô’s formula, we have

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathrm{d}}V(S,I) =& \biggl(1-\frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl[ \biggl( \varLambda -\mu S- \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI+ \gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau } \biggr)\,\mathrm{d}t \\ &{}-\sigma SI \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)\, \mathrm{d}B_{1}(t) \biggr] +\frac{a\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2S^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}{\mathrm{d}}t \\ &{}-a \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1- \gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)I \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \,\mathrm{d}t \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[a\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)SI \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t, \mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} + \biggl(1-\frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl[ \biggl( \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI-( \mu +\gamma )I \biggr)\, \mathrm{d}t+ \sigma \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI \,\mathrm{d}B(t) \biggr] \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) -\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \, \mathrm{d}t \\ &{}+\frac{ \sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2I^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} {\mathrm{d}}t \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI- \ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) \biggr] \tilde{N}( \mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} +\gamma Ie^{-\mu \tau }{\mathrm{d}}t-\gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau } {\mathrm{d}}t \\ =& \biggl(1-\frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl[ \biggl(\varLambda -\mu S- \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI+\gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau } \biggr) \biggr]{\mathrm{d}}t \\ &{} + \biggl[\frac{a\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2S^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}-a \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) \\ &{}+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \biggr]{\mathrm{d}}t \\ &{} + \biggl[ \biggl(1-\frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl( \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI-( \mu +\gamma )I \biggr)+ \frac{\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2I^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} \biggr]{\mathrm{d}}t \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) -\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \, \mathrm{d}t \\ &{} +\gamma Ie^{-\mu \tau _{2}}-\gamma I(t-\tau _{2})e^{-\mu \tau _{2}}) \,\mathrm{d}t \\ &{} -\sigma \biggl(1-\frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI \,\mathrm{d}B(t) +\sigma \biggl(1- \frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[a\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)SI \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t, \mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI- \ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) \biggr] \tilde{N}( \mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u) \\ =& LV(S,I)\,\mathrm{d}t -\sigma \biggl(1-\frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\ &{}+\sigma \biggl(1-\frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[a\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)SI \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t, \mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI- \ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) \biggr] \tilde{N}( \mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u). \end{aligned}$$

Here, \(LV: \mathbb{R}^{2}_{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{+}\) is defined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} LV(S,I) =& \biggl(1-\frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl[ \biggl( \varLambda -\mu S- \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI+ \gamma I(t-\tau )e^{-\mu \tau } \biggr) \biggr] \\ &{} + \biggl[\frac{a\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2S^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}-a \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) \\ &{}+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \biggr] \\ &{} + \biggl[ \biggl(1-\frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl( \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI-( \mu +\gamma )I \biggr)+ \frac{\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2I^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} \biggr] \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) -\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} +\gamma Ie^{-\mu \tau _{2}}-\gamma I(t-\tau _{2})e^{-\mu \tau _{2}} \\ \leq &(\varLambda +\mu a+\mu +\gamma )-\frac{a\varLambda }{S} + \biggl[a \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I}-\mu -\gamma \bigl(1-e^{-\mu \tau } \bigr) \biggr]I \\ &{} +\frac{a\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2S^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} +\frac{\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2I^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} \\ &{} -a \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) -\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \\ \leq & (\varLambda +\mu a+\mu +\gamma )-\frac{a\varLambda }{S} + \biggl[a \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I}-\mu -\gamma \bigl(1-e^{-\mu \tau } \bigr) \biggr]I \\ &{}+ \frac{a\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I ^{2}}{2S^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} \\ &{} +\frac{\sigma ^{2}S^{2}I^{2}}{2I^{2}} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} +a \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\varphi _{1}\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) + \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\varphi _{2}\lambda (\mathrm{d}u), \end{aligned}$$

where \(\varphi _{1}=-\ln (1-\gamma (u)(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})I) -\gamma (u)(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})I\), \(\varphi _{2}=-\ln (1+\gamma (u)(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})S) +\gamma (u)(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})S\) and choose \(a=\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{- \mu \tau })}{\beta _{2}}\).

On the other hand, notice that \(\mathrm{d}(S+I+ \gamma e^{-\mu t} \int _{t-\tau }^{t}e^{\mu S}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s)=[\varLambda -\gamma I-\mu (S+I+ \gamma e^{-\mu t}\int _{t-\tau }^{t}e^{\mu S}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s)]{\mathrm{d}}t\). Then

$$\begin{aligned}& S+I+ \gamma e^{-\mu t} \int _{t-\tau }^{t}e^{\mu S}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s \\ & \quad \leq \frac{\varLambda }{\mu }+e^{-\mu t} \biggl[S(0)+I(0)+ \gamma \int _{-\tau } ^{0}e^{\mu S}I(s) \, \mathrm{d}s-\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \biggr] \\ & \quad \leq \textstyle\begin{cases} \frac{\varLambda }{\mu },& \text{if } S(0)+I(0)+ \gamma \int _{-\tau }^{0}e^{\mu S}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s \leq \frac{\varLambda }{\mu }, \\ S(0)+I(0)+ \gamma \int _{-\tau }^{0}e^{\mu S}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s, &\text{if } S(0)+I(0)+ \gamma \int _{-\tau }^{0}e^{\mu S}I(s) \,\mathrm{d}s>\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \end{cases}\displaystyle \\ & \quad \triangleq K. \end{aligned}$$

Then applying the Taylor formula to the function \(\ln (1-t)\) where \(t=(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})I\gamma (u)\) and Assumption (H1) to \(\varphi _{1}\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _{1} =& -\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) - \gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \\ =& \gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I+ \frac{(( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I})I\gamma (u))^{2}}{2(1-\theta \gamma (u)(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})I )^{2}}-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \\ \leq & \frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}\delta ^{2} }{2(1-(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\delta )^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\theta \in (0,1)\) is an arbitrary number. Similarly,

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _{2} =&- \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) -\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \\ \leq& \frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2} \delta ^{2} }{2(1-(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\delta )^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} LV(S,I) \leq & (\varLambda +\mu a+\mu +\gamma )+\frac{a\sigma ^{2}K^{2}}{2}(2\beta _{1}- \beta _{2})^{2} +\frac{\sigma ^{2}K^{2}}{2}(2 \beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2} \\ &{} +\frac{(a+1)\delta ^{2}}{2}\frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{2(1- \delta (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}))^{2}}\triangleq \widetilde{K}. \end{aligned}$$

Therefore, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathrm{d}}V(S, I) \leq & \widetilde{K} {\mathrm{d}}t-\sigma \biggl(1- \frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) +\sigma \biggl(1-\frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\ &{} - \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[a\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)SI \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t, \mathrm{d}u) \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI- \ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) \biggr] \tilde{N}( \mathrm{d}t,\mathrm{d}u). \end{aligned}$$

Taking the integral on the above inequality from 0 to \(\tau _{k} \wedge T\),

$$\begin{aligned}& \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T}{\mathrm{d}}V(S, I) \\& \quad \leq \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T}\widetilde{K} {\mathrm{d}}t - \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T}\sigma \biggl(1- \frac{a}{S} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\& \qquad {} + \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T}\sigma \biggl(1- \frac{1}{I} \biggr) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI\,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\& \qquad {} - \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T} \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[a\ln \biggl(1-\gamma (u) \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)I \biggr) +\gamma (u)SI \biggl( \beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}s, \mathrm{d}u) \\& \qquad {} + \int _{0}^{\tau _{k}\wedge T} \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)SI-\ln \biggl(1+\gamma (u) \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr) \biggr]\tilde{N}( \mathrm{d}s,\mathrm{d}u), \end{aligned}$$

where \(\tau _{k}\wedge T =\min \{\tau _{k}, T\}\). Consequently,

$$ EV \bigl(S(\tau _{k}\wedge T), I(\tau _{k}\wedge T) \bigr)\leq V \bigl(S(0), I(0) \bigr)+ \widetilde{K}E(\tau _{k}\wedge T) \leq V \bigl(S(0), I(0) \bigr)+\widetilde{K}T. $$

Let \(\varOmega _{k}=\{\tau _{k}\leq T\}\), then \({P}(\varOmega _{k})\geq \varepsilon \). For each \(\omega \in \varOmega _{k}\), \(S(\tau _{k},\omega )\), or \(I(\tau _{k},\omega )\), equals either k or \(1/k\), and

$$ V \bigl(S(\tau _{k},\omega ), I(\tau _{k},\omega ) \bigr)\geq \min \{k-1- \ln k, 1/k-1+\ln k\}. $$


$$\begin{aligned} V \bigl(S(0), I(0) \bigr)+K T \geq & E \bigl[1_{\varOmega _{k}}(\omega )V \bigl(S( \omega ), I(\omega ) \bigr) \bigr] \\ \geq & \varepsilon \min \{k-1-\ln k, 1/k-1+\ln k\}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(1_{\varOmega _{k}}\) is the indicator function of \(\varOmega _{k}\). Letting \(k \rightarrow \infty \), we obtain the contradiction.

The proof is completed. □

The extinction of diseases of system (1.4) with Lévy jumps

In this section, we define

$$ R_{0}=\frac{\varLambda (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})}{\mu (\mu +\gamma )}, $$

and denote \(\langle x(t)\rangle =\frac{1}{t}\int _{0}^{t}x(s) \,\mathrm{d}s\), then the extinction of the disease will be discussed in the following.

Theorem 2.2

Suppose\((S(t), I(t))\)be any solution of system (1.4) with an initial value (1.3). Thus:

  1. (1)

    if\(\hat{\sigma }^{2}>\frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{4( \mu +\gamma )}\), then

    $$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\ln I(t)}{t}\leq \frac{(2 \beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{4\hat{\sigma }^{2}}-( \mu +\gamma )< 0 \quad \textit{a.s.}; $$
  2. (2)

    if\(R_{0}-1<\frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{ \mu ^{2}(\mu +\gamma )}\)and\(\hat{\sigma }^{2}\leq \frac{\mu (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})}{2\varLambda }\), then

    $$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\ln I(t)}{t}\leq (\mu + \gamma ) \biggl(R_{0}-1-\frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu ^{2}(\mu + \gamma )} \biggr)< 0\quad \textit{a.s.}, $$

where\(\hat{\sigma }^{2}=\frac{\beta _{1}^{2}\alpha ^{2}\sigma ^{2}}{2( \alpha +N_{0})^{2}}+\int _{\mathbf{Y}}\frac{\gamma ^{2}(u)\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}}{2(1+(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\delta )^{2}} \lambda (\mathrm{d}u)\).


Applying Itô’s formula, we derive that

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathrm{d \ln }}I(t) =& \biggl[ \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S-(\mu +\gamma )-\frac{\sigma ^{2}S^{2}}{2} \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} \biggr]\, { \mathrm{d}}t \\ &{}+\sigma \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \,\mathrm{d}B(t) \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr)- \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S \gamma (u) \biggr] \lambda ( \mathrm{d}u) \\ &{}+ \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\ln \biggl(1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}t, \mathrm{d}u). \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ln I(t)}{t} =& \frac{\ln I(0)}{t}+ \biggl\langle \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)S \biggr\rangle -(\mu +\gamma ) \\ &{}- \frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2} \biggl\langle \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}S^{2} \biggr\rangle + \frac{M_{1}(t)}{t} +\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t} \\ &{} +\frac{1}{t} \int _{0}^{t} \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln \biggl(1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr)- \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr] \lambda ( \mathrm{d}u)\,\mathrm{d}s \\ \leq & (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}) \langle S\rangle -(\mu +\gamma )-\frac{\beta _{1}^{2}\alpha ^{2}}{2(\alpha +N_{0})^{2}}\sigma ^{2} \bigl\langle S^{2} \bigr\rangle +\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t} +\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+ \frac{\ln I(0)}{t} \\ &{} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \frac{\gamma ^{2}(u)\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}}{2(1+(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\delta )^{2}}\lambda (\mathrm{d}u) \bigl\langle S^{2} \bigr\rangle . \end{aligned}$$

Here, \(M_{1}(t)=\int _{0}^{t}\sigma (\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I})S\,\mathrm{d}B(s)\) and \(M_{2}(t)=\int _{0}^{t}\int _{ \mathbf{Y}}\ln (1+\gamma (u)(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I})S)\tilde{N}(\mathrm{d}s, \mathrm{d}u)\).

On the other hand, we have

$$ {\mathrm{d}} \biggl(S+I+\gamma e^{-\mu \tau } \int _{t-\tau }^{t}I(s) \,\mathrm{d}s \biggr)= \bigl[ \varLambda -\mu S- \bigl(\mu +\gamma \bigl(1-e^{-\mu \tau } \bigr) \bigr)I \bigr]\, { \mathrm{d}}t. $$


$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{S+I+\gamma e^{-\mu \tau }\int _{t-\tau }^{t}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s}{t}-\frac{S(0)+I(0)+ \gamma e^{-\mu \tau }\int _{-\tau }^{0}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s}{t} \\& \quad =\varLambda -\mu \bigl\langle S(t) \bigr\rangle - \bigl(\mu +\gamma \bigl(1-e^{-\mu \tau } \bigr) \bigr) \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle . \end{aligned}$$


$$ \bigl\langle S(t) \bigr\rangle =\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } -\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e ^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\phi (t), $$

and here, \(\phi (t)=\frac{S+I+\gamma e^{-\mu \tau }\int _{t-\tau }^{t}I(s) \,\mathrm{d}s}{\mu t} -\frac{S(0)+I(0)+\gamma e^{-\mu \tau }\int _{- \tau }^{0}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s}{\mu t}\), thus \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }\phi (t)=0\). According to (2.11), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ln I(t)}{t} \leq & (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}) \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle -(\mu +\gamma ) - \hat{ \sigma }^{2} \bigl\langle S^{2} \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle +\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+ \frac{M _{2}(t)}{t} + \frac{\ln I(0)}{t} \\ \leq & (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}) \biggl[ \frac{\varLambda }{\mu }-\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e ^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\phi (t) \biggr]-(\mu +\gamma ) \\ &{} - \hat{\sigma }^{2} \biggl[ \frac{\varLambda }{\mu }- \frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{- \mu \tau })}{\mu } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\phi (t) \biggr]^{2}+\frac{\ln I(0)}{t}+ \frac{M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)}{t} \\ =& (\mu +\gamma ) \biggl(\frac{\varLambda (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})}{\mu (\mu + \gamma )}-1- \frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu ^{2}(\mu +\gamma )} \biggr) \\ &{}-\frac{ \mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \biggl((2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})-2 \hat{\sigma }^{2}\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \biggr) \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \\ &{}+\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+\psi (t), \end{aligned}$$


$$ \psi (t)= -(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\phi (t)+ 2\hat{ \sigma }^{2}\frac{\varLambda }{ \mu }\phi (t)-\hat{\sigma }^{2} \biggl(\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle + \phi (t) \biggr)^{2}+\frac{\ln I(0)}{t}. $$

In addition,

$$\begin{aligned}& \langle M_{1},M_{1}\rangle _{t}=\sigma ^{2} \int _{0}^{t} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}S^{2}\, {\mathrm{d}}s, \\& \langle M_{2},M_{2}\rangle _{t}= \int _{0}^{t} \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl( \ln \biggl(1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr) \biggr)^{2}\lambda (\mathrm{d}u)\,\mathrm{d}s, \end{aligned}$$


$$ \ln \biggl(1+\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}\theta \biggr)\leq \ln \biggl(1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}-\frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)S\gamma (u) \biggr) \leq \ln \bigl(1+(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\theta \bigr). $$

Then we have

$$ \langle M_{2},M_{2}\rangle _{t}\leq \max \biggl\{ \bigl(\ln \bigl(1+(2\beta _{1}- \beta _{2})\theta \bigr) \bigr)^{2}, \biggl(\ln \biggl(1+\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{ \alpha +N_{0}}\theta \biggr) \biggr)^{2} \biggr\} \lambda (\mathbf{Y})t $$


$$\begin{aligned}& \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \frac{\langle M_{1},M_{1}\rangle _{t}}{t}=\sigma ^{2} \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{1}{t} \int _{0}^{t} \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr)^{2}S^{2}{\mathrm{d}}s\leq \sigma ^{2}(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2} \biggl(\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \biggr)^{2} \\& \hphantom{\limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \frac{\langle M_{1},M_{1}\rangle _{t}}{t}}< \infty \quad \mbox{a.s.}, \\& \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \frac{\langle M_{2},M_{2}\rangle _{t}}{t}\leq \max \biggl\{ \bigl( \ln \bigl(1+(2 \beta _{1}-\beta _{2})\theta \bigr) \bigr)^{2}, \biggl(\ln \biggl(1+\frac{\beta _{1} \alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}\theta \biggr) \biggr)^{2} \biggr\} \lambda (\mathbf{Y}) \\& \hphantom{\limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \frac{\langle M_{2},M_{2}\rangle _{t}}{t}}< \infty , \quad \mbox{a.s.} \end{aligned}$$


$$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{M_{i}(t)}{t}=0\quad (i=1,2) \quad \text{and}\quad \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\psi (t)=0. $$

By virtue of the condition (2) and (2.12), we obtain

$$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\ln I(t)}{t}\leq (\mu + \gamma ) \biggl(R_{0}-1-\frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu ^{2}(\mu + \gamma )} \biggr)< 0\quad \mbox{a.s.} $$

Moreover, according to (2.12), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ln I(t)}{t} \leq & (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}) \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle -(\mu +\gamma )- \hat{ \sigma }^{2} \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle ^{2}+\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+\frac{M _{2}(t)}{t}+ \frac{\ln I(0)}{t} \\ =& -\hat{\sigma }^{2} \biggl[ \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle ^{2}-\frac{(2\beta _{1}- \beta _{2})}{\hat{\sigma }^{2}} \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle \biggr]-(\mu + \gamma ) + \frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+ \frac{\ln I(0)}{t} \\ =& -\hat{\sigma }^{2} \biggl( \bigl\langle S \bigl(t^{-} \bigr) \bigr\rangle -\frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})}{2\hat{\sigma }^{2}} \biggr)^{2} + \frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{4 \hat{\sigma }^{2}}-(\mu +\gamma ) \\ &{} +\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+\frac{\ln I(0)}{t} \\ \leq & -(\mu +\gamma )+\frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{4\hat{\sigma }^{2}} +\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+ \frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+\frac{\ln I(0)}{t}. \end{aligned}$$

According to the condition (1) and (2.14), we obtain

$$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\ln I(t)}{t}\leq -(\mu + \gamma )+ \frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2}}{4\hat{\sigma }^{2}}< 0, \quad \mbox{a.s.} $$

That is, \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }I(t)=0\). Moreover, we have

$$ \lim _{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle S(t) \bigr\rangle =\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } - \frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu }\lim _{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\lim _{t\rightarrow \infty } \phi (t)=\frac{\varLambda }{\mu }. $$

The conclusion is proven. □

Persistence in the mean of system (1.4)

Now we are in a position to discuss the persistence in the mean of the disease and before that some notations are presented in the following.

For convenience, we denote

$$\begin{aligned}& R_{1}=\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha \varLambda }{(\mu +\gamma )\mu (\alpha +N _{0})}, \\& \tilde{\sigma }=\frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2} \biggl(\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N _{0}} \biggr)^{2}N^{2}_{0} + \int _{\mathbf{Y}}\frac{(2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})^{2} \delta ^{2}}{2(1-\delta (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2}))^{2}}\lambda ( \mathrm{d}u), \\& \lambda ^{*}=(\mu +\gamma ) \biggl(R_{0}-1- \frac{\hat{\sigma }^{2}\varLambda ^{2}}{\mu ^{2}(\mu +\gamma )} \biggr), \\& \lambda _{0}=\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \biggl((2\beta _{1}- \beta _{2})-2\hat{\sigma }^{2}\frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \biggr), \\& I_{*}=\frac{\lambda ^{*}}{\lambda _{0}},\qquad \widetilde{I^{*}}= \frac{ \mu (\alpha +N_{0})((\mu +\gamma )(R_{1}-1)-\tilde{\sigma })}{\beta _{1}\alpha (\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau }))}. \end{aligned}$$

Theorem 2.3

Suppose that Assumption (H1)holds and\(R_{1}-1>\frac{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu +\gamma }\), then, for the solution\((S(t),I(t))\)of model (1.4), we have

$$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \leq I_{*},\qquad \liminf_{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \geq \widetilde{I^{*}}. $$


By virtue of (2.12), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ln I(t)}{t} \leq & (\mu +\gamma ) \biggl(R_{0}-1- \frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu ^{2}(\mu +\gamma )} \biggr) -\frac{\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{ \mu } \biggl((2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})-2\hat{\sigma }^{2} \frac{\varLambda }{\mu } \biggr) \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \\ &{} + \frac{M_{1}(t)}{t}+\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+\psi (t). \end{aligned}$$


$$ \ln I(t)\leq \lambda ^{*} t-\lambda _{0} \int _{0}^{t}I(s)\,\mathrm{d}s+F(t), $$

here, \(F(t)=M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)+\psi (t) t\).

Considering \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{F(t)}{t}=0\), then, for an arbitrary \(\zeta >0\), there exist a \(T_{1}=T_{1}(\omega )>0\) and a set \(\varOmega _{k}\) such that \(\frac{F(t)}{t}\leq \zeta \) and \(P(\varOmega _{k})\geq 1-\zeta \) for all \(t\geq T_{1}\), \(\omega \in \varOmega _{k}\). Let \(\hat{T}=\max \{T, T_{1}\}\), then according to Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 3 in Ref. [19], we obtain

$$ \limsup_{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \leq \frac{\lambda ^{*}}{\lambda _{0}}\triangleq I_{*}. $$

On the other hand, by (2.8) and (2.11), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ln I(t)}{t} =& \biggl\langle \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) S \biggr\rangle -(\mu + \gamma )- \frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2} \biggl\langle \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr)^{2} S^{2} \biggr\rangle \\ &{}+ \frac{M_{1}(t)}{t} + \frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+\frac{ \ln I(0)}{t} \\ &{} +\frac{1}{t} \int _{0}^{t} \int _{\mathbf{Y}} \biggl[\ln (1+ \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{ \beta _{2}I}{\alpha +I} \biggr) S\gamma (u) - \biggl(\beta _{1}- \frac{\beta _{2}I}{ \alpha +I} \biggr) S\gamma (u) \biggr]\lambda (\mathrm{d}u)\, \mathrm{d}s \\ \geq & \frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}} \bigl\langle S(t) \bigr\rangle -(\mu + \gamma )- \tilde{\sigma } +\frac{M_{1}(t)}{t} +\frac{M_{2}(t)}{t}+ \frac{ \ln I(0)}{t} \\ =& \frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}} \biggl[\frac{\varLambda }{\mu }-\frac{ \mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau })}{\mu } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\phi (t) \biggr] \\ &{} -(\mu +\gamma )-\tilde{\sigma } + \frac{M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)+\ln I(0)}{t} \\ =& (\mu +\gamma ) \biggl[ \frac{\beta _{1}\alpha \varLambda }{\mu (\alpha +N _{0})(\mu +\gamma )} -1 \biggr] -\tilde{\sigma }- \frac{\beta _{1}\alpha ( \mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau }))}{\mu (\alpha +N_{0})} \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \\ &{} -\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}\phi (t) +\frac{M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)+ \ln I(0)}{t} \\ =& (\mu +\gamma ) [ R_{1} -1 ] -\tilde{\sigma }- \frac{\beta _{1} \alpha (\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau }))}{\mu (\alpha +N_{0})} \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle -\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}\phi (t) \\ &{} +\frac{M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)+\ln I(0)}{t}. \end{aligned}$$

As \(0< S+I\leq N_{0}\), then we derive that \(-\infty <\ln I(t)< \ln (N_{0})\). Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \geq & \frac{\mu (\alpha +N_{0})}{\beta _{1}\alpha (\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau }))} \biggl((\mu +\gamma ) (R_{1}-1)-\tilde{\sigma } \\ &{} -\frac{\beta _{1}\alpha }{\alpha +N_{0}}\phi (t)+ \frac{M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t)}{t} - \frac{\ln (N_{0})-\ln I(0)}{t} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$

By virtue of the conclusion \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }\phi (t)=0\), we derive that

$$ \liminf_{t\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\langle I(t) \bigr\rangle \geq \frac{\mu ( \alpha +N_{0}) [(\mu +\gamma )(R_{1}-1)-\tilde{\sigma }]}{\beta _{1} \alpha (\mu +\gamma (1-e^{-\mu \tau }))}\triangleq \widetilde{I^{*}}. $$

This completes the proof. □

Discussions and numerical simulations for system (1.4)

In this paper, we propose a stochastic SIR epidemic model that incorporate the effects of temporary immunity and media coverage. Some theoretical results are obtained with the influence of Lévy jumps. We prove that the system has a unique global solution at first. Then the conditions for extinction and persistence of the disease is derived. The results reveal that the intensity of Lévy noises can greatly influence the extinction and persistence of the disease.

In the following, we give some numerical simulations to support our obtained theoretical results of model (1.4) through the Milstein method [27] and Euler numerical approximation [28].

Example 3.1

Choose the parameter values in model (1.2) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned}& \varLambda =0.6,\qquad \beta _{1}=0.3,\qquad \beta _{2}=0.2, \qquad \mu =0.15, \qquad \gamma =0.2, \\& \alpha =1.8,\qquad \gamma (u)=0.07,\qquad \sigma =0.03,\qquad S(0)=2, \\& I(0)=0.5,\qquad \mathbf{Y}=(0,+\infty ),\qquad \lambda (\mathbf{Y})=1, \end{aligned}$$

then we have

$$ R_{1}=1.064>1+\frac{\tilde{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu +\gamma }=1.0251, $$

and the condition of Theorem 2.3 is satisfied. Thus, the disease I is persistent with probability one and Fig. 1 confirms it. The red lines, the green lines and the blue lines are solutions of system (1.4), the corresponding deterministic system and the system with white noise, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

The populations are persistent in the mean for system (1.4)

Example 3.2

Let the parameters be as follows:

$$\begin{aligned}& \varLambda =0.3,\qquad \beta _{1}=0.002,\qquad \beta _{2}=0.001, \qquad \mu =0.6, \qquad \gamma =0.1,\qquad \alpha =0.1, \\& \sigma =0.3,\qquad \gamma (u)=0.6,\qquad S(0)=0.5,\qquad I(0)=2,\qquad \mathbf{Y}=(0,+\infty ),\qquad \lambda (\mathbf{Y})=1, \end{aligned}$$

then \(R_{0}=0.0021< 1+\frac{\varLambda ^{2}\hat{\sigma }^{2}}{\mu ^{2}( \mu +\gamma )}\doteq 1\) and \(\hat{\sigma }^{2}=1.3023*10^{-5}\leq \frac{ \mu (2\beta _{1}-\beta _{2})}{2\varLambda }=2.7*10^{-4}\). Applying the conditions (2) in Theorem 2.2, we derive that the infective population \(I(t)\) will be extinct with probability one (see Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

The disease goes to extinction

Example 3.3

In model (1.4), set

$$ \varLambda =0.3,\qquad \beta _{1}=0.002,\qquad \beta _{2}=0.001, \qquad \mu =0.15, \qquad \gamma =0.01,\qquad \alpha =0.01. $$

The initial value is \((S(0), I(0))=(0.5, 0.1)\). To show the effects of noise to the system (1.4), two cases are considered as follows: (1) \(\sigma =0.1\), \(\gamma (u)=0.1\), (2) \(\sigma =0.1\), \(\gamma (u)=0.7\), and we obtain Fig. 3, where the green lines, the blue lines the red lines, and the rose lines denote solutions of the deterministic system, the system with white noise, system (1.4) with \(\gamma (u)=0.1\) and \(\gamma (u)=0.7\), respectively. We derive that jumps have negative effects for the prevailing of diseases (see Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

The effects of jumps to system (1.4)

At last, some interesting issues merit further investigations. In this paper, the threshold behavior is discussed and two threshold expressions \(R_{0}\) and \(R_{1}\) are obtained. However, the threshold value cannot be derived according to the complex expression of the contact rate and it is an interesting issue left for further work. Moreover, in this paper, we consider the effects of white noise and the Lévy jumps to the model behavior, however, if we also take other perturbations, such as the regime-switching [2931] to the proposal of epidemic model, what will happen? We will also investigate this question in our future work.


  1. 1.

    Cai, Y., Kang, Y., Banerjee, M., Wang, W.: A stochastic epidemic model incorporating media coverage. Commun. Math. Sci. 14(4), 893–910 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sahu, G.P., Dhar, J.: Dynamics of an SEQIHRS epidemic model with media coverage quarantine and isolation in a community with pre-existing immunity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 421, 1651–1672 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tchuenche, J., Dube, N., Bhunu, C., Smith, R., Bauch, C.: The impact of media coverage on the transmission dynamics of human influenza. BMC Public Health 11(suppl. 1), S5 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhao, M., Zhao, H.: Asymptotic behavior of global positive solution to a stochastic SIR model incorporating media coverage. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016(1), 149 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu, W., Zheng, Q.: A stochastic sis epidemic model incorporating media coverage in a two patch setting. Appl. Math. Comput. 262, 160–168 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhang, Y., Fan, K., Gao, S., Liu, Y., Chen, S.: Ergodic stationary distribution of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model incorporating media coverage and saturated incidence rate. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 514, 671–685 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Guo, W., Zhang, Q., Li, X., et al.: Dynamic behavior of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with media coverage. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41, 5506–5525 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Funk, S., Gilad, E., Watkins, C., et al.: The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(16), 6872–6877 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang, Y., Cao, J., Jin, Z., et al.: Impact of media coverage on epidemic spreading in complex networks. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 392(23), 5824–5835 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xiao, Y., Tang, S., Wu, J.: Media impact switching surface during an infectious disease outbreak. Sci. Rep. 5, 7838 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huo, H., Huang, S., Wang, X., et al.: Optimal control of a social epidemic model with media coverage. J. Biol. Dyn. 11(1), 226–243 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fan, K., Zhang, Y., Gao, S., et al.: A class of stochastic delayed SIR epidemic models with generalized nonlinear incidence rate and temporary immunity. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 481, 198–208 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kyrychko, Y.N., Blyuss, K.B.: Global properties of a delayed SIR model with temporary immunity and nonlinear incidence rate. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 6, 495–507 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sahu, G., Dhar, J.: Analysis of an SVEIS epidemic model with partial temporary immunity and saturation incidence rate. Appl. Math. Model. 36(3), 908–923 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang, S., Xu, R.: Travelling waves and global attractivity of an SIRS disease model with spatial diffusion and temporary immunity. Appl. Math. Comput. 224, 635–651 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Blyuss, K.B., Kyrychko, Y.N.: Stability and bifurcations in an epidemic model with varying immunity period. Bull. Math. Biol. 72(2), 490–505 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xu, R., Ma, Z., Wang, Z.: Global stability of a delayed SIRS epidemic model with saturation incidence and temporary immunity. Comput. Math. Appl. 59(9), 3211–3221 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Taylor, M., Carr, T.: An SIR epidemic model with partial temporary immunity modeled with delay. J. Math. Biol. 59(6), 841–880 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liu, Q., Jiang, D., Hayat, T., Ahmad, B.: Analysis of a delayed vaccinated SIR epidemic model with temporary immunity and Lévy jumps. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 27, 29–43 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bao, J., Yuan, C.: Stochastic population dynamics driven by Lévy noise. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 391, 363–375 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, X., Jiang, D., Hayat, T., Ahmad, B.: Dynamics of a stochastic SIS model with double epidemic diseases driven by Lévy jumps. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 471, 767–777 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mao, X.: Stochastic versions of the LaSalle theorem. J. Differ. Equ. 153, 175–195 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang, S., Meng, X., Feng, T., et al.: Dynamics analysis and numerical simulations of a stochastic non-autonomous predator–prey system with impulsive effects. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 26, 19–37 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu, M., Wang, K., Wu, Q.: Survival analysis of stochastic competitive models in a polluted environment and stochastic competitive exclusion principle. Bull. Math. Biol. 73, 1969–2012 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Miao, A., Wang, X., Zhang, T., et al.: Dynamical analysis of a stochastic SIS epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate and double epidemic hypothesis. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 226 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tang, T., Teng, Z., Li, Z.: Threshold behavior in a class of stochastic SIRS epidemic models with nonlinear incidence. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 33, 994–1019 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Higham, D.: An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Rev. 43, 525–546 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Protter, P., Talay, D.: The Euler scheme for Lévy driven stochastic differential equations. Ann. Probab. 25, 393–423 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Deng, Y., Liu, M.: Analysis of a stochastic tumor-immune model with regime switching and impulsive perturbations. Appl. Math. Model. 78, 482–504 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Deng, M., Liu, M.: Analysis of a stochastic hybrid population model with Allee effect. Appl. Math. Comput. 364, 124582 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, H., Liu, M.: Stationary distribution of a stochastic hybrid phytoplankton–zooplankton model with toxin-producing phytoplankton. Appl. Math. Lett. 101, 106077 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the anonymous referees and associated editor for his/her careful reading of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


This work is supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (11901110, 11961003), The National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi (20192BAB211003, 20192ACBL20004) and The Foundation of Education Committee of Jiangxi (GJJ160929, GJJ170824).

Author information




All authors contributed substantially to this paper, participated in drafting and checking the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zhang, Y. & Wang, Q. A stochastic SIR epidemic model with Lévy jump and media coverage. Adv Differ Equ 2020, 70 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Lévy jump
  • Temporary immunity
  • Threshold value
  • Extinction