 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Solvability of a class of hyperboliccosinetype difference equations
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2020, Article number: 564 (2020)
Abstract
We describe a method for constructing one of the basic classes of solvable hyperboliccosinetype difference equations, generalizing a known difference equation by Laplace in a natural way.
Introduction
Let \({\mathbb {N}}\), \({\mathbb {Z}}\), \({\mathbb {R}}\), \({\mathbb {C}}\) be the sets of natural, whole, real, and complex numbers, respectively, and \({\mathbb {N}}_{0}={\mathbb {N}}\cup \{0\}\). If \(k,l\in {\mathbb {Z}}\), then \(j=\overline{k,l}\) stands for the set of all \(j\in {\mathbb {Z}}\) such that \(k\le j\le l\).
Finding closedform formulas for solutions to difference equations is one of the basic problems in the area. The equation
when \(b\ne 0\) and \(a^{2}+4b\ne 0\), was solved by de Moivre in [1] (see also [2]). He found a formula for solution to equation (1), which is called the de Moivre formula for solutions to linear homogeneous secondorder difference equation with constant coefficients, which is one of the first nontrivial results on solvability of difference equations. Before it, some special cases of equation (1) had been solved in [3].
These results attracted some attention, and soon after that Bernoulli in [4] found another method for solving linear difference equations with constant coefficients. A presentation of some old results on solvability can be found in [5]. For some later results see [6, 7], as well as [8], where many classes of difference equations and systems were solved. For some twentieth century presentations of the theory, see, for example, [9–13]. Some recent results on solvability of difference equations and systems have been obtained and guessed by computer packages for symbolic calculations. They can help in getting or guessing some closedform formulas for solutions to the equations and systems, but using only such tools could also produce some issues (see some comments, e.g., in [14–17]). This has been one of the reasons which motivated us to conduct more serious investigations on solvability of difference equations and systems. Recent investigations show that still a great majority of papers on solvability use some substitutions of various complexity, which transform difference equations and systems to known solvable ones (see, for example, [14, 18–26] and the references therein). It should be mentioned that solvable difference equations and systems have many applications (see, e.g., [2, 4, 7–10, 12, 27–29]). For invariants for difference equations and systems, and their applications in solvability, see, for example, [30–35].
Recently, solvability of the socalled hyperboliccotangenttype difference equations, as well as of the corresponding systems of difference equations, has been studied (see [22–26]). The difference equations and systems therein resemble the hyperboliccotangent sum formula which has been a good hint for solvability of the equations and systems. Generally speaking, the difference equations and systems which resemble some trigonometric or hyperbolic trigonometric formulas are natural candidates to be solvable. This is an observation known to mathematicians for a long time.
Now, as a motivation for the study, we present a known example along with the most important details related to solvability of the equation in the example.
Example 1
The following difference equation
was already known to Laplace [8]. He noticed that equation (2) is solvable. Namely, if \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\), then there is \(a\in {\mathbb {C}}\setminus \{0\}\) such that
(see, e.g., [36]).
By using (3) in (2), then repeating the procedure, he noticed that
and concluded
which is easily proved by induction. Laplace did not conduct further analysis of solutions to equation (2).
In what follows we mention several simple folklore things related to solvability of the equation in the case when \(x_{0}\) is a real number. If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), then \(x_{0}\) can be written in the form given in (3) for some \(a>0\). For \(x_{0}=2\), we have \(x_{1}=2\), and by the method of induction, constant solution \(x_{n}=2\) for every \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}\) is easily obtained. In this case there is unique a such that (3) holds, namely \(a=1\). If \(x_{0}>2\), then there are two positive values of a such that (3) holds. They are the roots of the quadratic polynomial \(t^{2}x_{0}t+1\), that is,
If one of the numbers \(a_{1,2}\) is denoted by a, by the Viète formulas, we see that the second one is \(1/a\). So, since formula (4) is invariant under the transformation \(a\to 1/a\), whichever of these two numbers is used, the formula is always obtained.
By combining (4) and (5), we see that the solution to equation (2) in this case can be written as follows:
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), then \(x_{1}=x_{0}^{2}2\ge 2\). This means that this case is reduced to the previous one. Namely, if
for some \(b>0\), then
From (6) we have \(b^{2}(x_{0}^{2}2)b+1=0\), so that
and \(b_{1}=1/b_{2}\). Using this in (7), we get
If \(a>0\), note that (4) can be written in the following form:
where \(\widehat{a}=\ln a\). This means that if \(x_{0}=2\cosh \widehat{a}\), then \(x_{n}=2\cosh (2^{n}\widehat{a})\), \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}\).
Bearing in mind the form of formula (9), we see that equation (2) is closely related to the hyperbolic cosine function. This connection is not so strange at all. Namely, by using the change of variables \(x_{n}=2\tilde{x}_{n}\), \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}\), in equation (2), it is transformed to the following one:
which resembles the formula
Because of this, it is natural to say that equation (2) in the case \(\vert x_{0} \vert \ge 2\) is an example of hyperboliccosinetype difference equations.
If \(x_{0}\in [2,2]\), then \(x_{0}\) can be written in the form given in (3) for some \(a=e^{i\theta }\), where \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\). In this case we have \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \), whereas from (4) we get
Hence, in the case \(x_{0}\in [2,2]\), equation (2) is an example of cosinetype difference equations.
A natural problem is to try to find related hyperboliccosinetype difference equations, which are also solvable. This problem seems classical one, but we could not find a complete solution to the problem in the literature so far. Beside this, it is good to have all the things, some of which seem scattered in the literature, in the same place. Hence, we consider here the problem in detail. We show that there is a natural sequence of hyperboliccosinetype difference equations which are solvable in closed form and describe a simple constructive way for obtaining the sequence of equations.
A basic class of solvable hyperboliccosinetype difference equations
In this section we explain how a natural class/sequence of hyperboliccosinetype difference equations related to equation (2) is obtained, which are also solvable.
Basic ideas and equations
First, note that the main thing connected to solvability of equation (2) is the fact that the following relation holds:
for every \(a\in {\mathbb {C}}\setminus \{0\}\), which is a simple, but no doubt very useful, relation between the quantities
for \(k=1\) and \(k=2\).
The consideration in Example 1 suggests that if we can express the quantity \(I_{3}\) in terms of \(I_{1}\) in a similar way, then we can obtain another solvable difference equation. It is not difficult to see that such a relation exists. Namely, we have
for every \(a\in {\mathbb {C}}\setminus \{0\}\).
Let the sequence \((x_{n})_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}}\) be a solution to the following difference equation:
and \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\).
Write the initial value \(x_{0}\) in the form in (3). Then we have
and by a simple inductive argument, we obtain
The corresponding consideration in Example 1 shows that equation (12) when \(\vert x_{0} \vert \ge 2\) is also an example of a hyperboliccosinetype difference equation, which is solvable. Moreover, we see that the following result holds.
Proposition 1
Consider equation (12). Then the following statements hold:

(a)
If \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\) is given by (3), then the solution to the equation is given by (13).

(b)
If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{3^{n}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{3^{n}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(c)
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{3^{n1}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{3^{n1}}, \quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}. $$ 
(d)
If \(\vert x_{0} \vert \le 2\) and \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \) for some \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=2\cos \bigl(3^{n}\theta \bigr),\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$
Following the above idea, we can try to express the quantity \(I_{4}\) in terms of \(I_{1}\) in a similar way, and then use the relation in order to obtain another solvable difference equation. Namely, we have
Let the sequence \((x_{n})_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}}\) be a solution to the following difference equation:
and \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\).
Write the initial value \(x_{0}\) in the form in (3). Then we have
and by a simple inductive argument, we obtain
for \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}\).
So, equation (15) is also an example of a hyperboliccosinetype difference equation, which is solvable. Moreover, we see that the following result holds.
Proposition 2
Consider equation (15). Then the following statements hold:

(a)
If \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\) is given by (3), then the solution to the equation is given by (16).

(b)
If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), general solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{4^{n}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{4^{n}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(c)
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), general solution to the equation is given by the following formula:
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{4^{n1}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{4^{n1}}, \quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}. $$ 
(d)
If \(\vert x_{0} \vert \le 2\) and \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \) for some \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=2\cos \bigl(4^{n}\theta \bigr),\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$
The corresponding relation between \(I_{5}\) and \(I_{1}\) is the following:
where in the last equality we have used relation (11).
Let the sequence \((x_{n})_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}}\) be a solution to the following difference equation:
and \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\).
Write the initial value \(x_{0}\) in the form in (3). Then we have
and by a simple inductive argument, we obtain
So, equation (18) is another example of a hyperboliccosinetype difference equation, which is solvable. Moreover, we see that the following result holds.
Proposition 3
Consider equation (18). Then the following statements hold:

(a)
If \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\) is given by (3), then the solution to the equation is given by (19).

(b)
If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), general solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{5^{n}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{5^{n}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(c)
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), general solution to the equation is given by the following formula:
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{5^{n1}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{5^{n1}}, \quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}. $$ 
(d)
If \(\vert x_{0} \vert \le 2\) and \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \) for some \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=2\cos \bigl(5^{n}\theta \bigr),\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$
The corresponding relation between \(I_{6}\) and \(I_{1}\) is the following:
where in the last equality we have used (10) and (14).
Let the sequence \((x_{n})_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}}\) be a solution to the following difference equation:
and \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\).
Write the initial value \(x_{0}\) in the form in (3). Then we have
and by a simple inductive argument, we obtain
So, equation (21) is another example of a hyperboliccosinetype difference equation, which is solvable on a domain. Moreover, we see that the following result holds.
Proposition 4
Consider equation (21). Then the following statements hold:

(a)
If \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\) is given by (3), then the solution to the equation is given by (22).

(b)
If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), general solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{6^{n}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{6^{n}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(c)
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), general solution to the equation is given by the following formula:
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{6^{n1}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{6^{n1}}, \quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}. $$ 
(d)
If \(\vert x_{0} \vert \le 2\) and \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \) for some \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=2\cos \bigl(6^{n}\theta \bigr),\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$
Remark 1
Relations (10), (11), (14), (17), and (20) are well known and are frequently used in various situations such as in solving the polynomial equations
in the case \(a_{j}=a_{kj}\), \(j=\overline{0,k}\) (see, e.g., [37]).
Main equation
By using the procedure preceding Propositions 1–4, other solvable hyperboliccosinetype difference equations can be found. However, the corresponding relations become more and more complicated, so the method is not so effective. Note that equations (2), (12), (15), (18), and (21) can be written in the form
where
Hence, it is of some interest to find a polynomial class \((P_{k})_{k\in {\mathbb {N}}}\) containing them.
To do this, it should be said that a very useful fact related to the sequence of polynomials \(P_{k}(t)\), \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), is that they satisfy a linear recursive relation of second order. Namely, let
then
Since
we have \(P_{k+1}(t)P_{1}(t)P_{k}(t)+P_{k1}(t)=0\), that is,
for \(k\ge 2\), which is the desired recursive relation.
From this, since initial values are
all the polynomials \(P_{k}(t)\) can be calculated recursively. Moreover, since it is a homogeneous linear difference equation, it can be solved in a closed form.
Indeed, the characteristic polynomial associated with equation (25) is \(\widehat{P}_{2}(\lambda )=\lambda ^{2}t\lambda +1\), and its roots are
Hence, general solution to equation (25) has the following form:
The determinant of system (29) is
Hence, after some calculations, we have
and
By using (30) and (31) in (28), we have
for \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), which is the desired closedform formula for \(P_{k}\).
Remark 2
Related recursive relations to the one in (25) appeared frequently in mathematics. A close relative to it is the following recursive relation:
with the initial conditions
defining Chebyshev polynomials, which are usually denoted by \(T_{k}(t)\).
If \(\vert t \vert \ge 1\), then we have
for \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}\) (see, e.g., [38, 39]).
Remark 3
Using (25), (26), and a simple inductive argument, we can easily prove the following representations:
for some \(a_{j}\), \(j=\overline{2,k1}\), and \(b_{j}\), \(j=\overline{2,k}\). The simple proof is left to the reader.
From the above consideration similar to Example 1, the following result is obtained, which completely solves the solvability problem for the class of difference equations in (23).
Theorem 1
Consider equation (23), where \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\setminus \{1\}\) and the polynomial \(P_{k}\) is given by (32). Then the following statements hold:

(a)
If \(x_{0}\in {\mathbb {C}}\) is given by (3), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=a^{k^{n}}+\frac{1}{a^{k^{n}}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(b)
If \(x_{0}\ge 2\), general solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{k^{n}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{k^{n}},\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$ 
(c)
If \(x_{0}\le 2\), general solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}= \biggl(\frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{k^{n1}}+ \biggl( \frac{x_{0}^{2}2x_{0}\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}4}}{2} \biggr)^{k^{n1}}, \quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}. $$ 
(d)
If \(\vert x_{0} \vert \le 2\) and \(x_{0}=2\cos \theta \) for some \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\), then the solution to the equation is given by
$$ x_{n}=2\cos \bigl(k^{n}\theta \bigr),\quad n\in {\mathbb {N}}_{0}. $$
References
 1.
de Moivre, A.: Miscellanea Analytica de Seriebus et Quadraturis. J. Tonson & J. Watts, Londini (1730) (in Latin)
 2.
de Moivre, A.: The Doctrine of Chances, 3rd edn. Strand Publishing, London (1756)
 3.
de Moivre, A.: De Fractionibus Algebraicis Radicalitate immunibus ad Fractiones Simpliciores reducendis, deque summandis Terminis quarumdam Serierum aequali Intervallo a se distantibus. Philos. Trans. 32, 162–178 (1722) (in Latin)
 4.
Bernoulli, D.: Observationes de seriebus quae formantur ex additione vel substractione quacunque terminorum se mutuo consequentium, ubi praesertim earundem insignis usus pro inveniendis radicum omnium aequationum algebraicarum ostenditur. Commentarii Acad. Petropol. III 1728, 85–100 (1732) (in Latin)
 5.
Euler, L.: Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum, Tomus Primus. Lausannae (1748) (in Latin)
 6.
Lagrange, J.L.: Sur l’intégration d’une équation différentielle à différences finies, qui contient la théorie des suites récurrentes. In: Miscellanea Taurinensia, T. I, pp. 33–42 (1759) (Lagrange OEuvres, I, pp. 23–36, 1867) (in French)
 7.
Lagrange, J.L.: OEuvres, T. II. GauthierVillars, Paris (1868) (in French)
 8.
Laplace, P.S.: Recherches sur l’intégration des équations différentielles aux différences finies et sur leur usage dans la théorie des hasards. In: Mémoires de l’ Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris 1773, T. VII (1776) (Laplace OEuvres, VIII, pp. 69–197, 1891) (in French)
 9.
Fort, T.: Finite Differences and Difference Equations in the Real Domain. Oxford University Press, London (1948)
 10.
Jordan, C.: Calculus of Finite Differences. Chelsea, New York (1956)
 11.
Markov, A.A.: Ischislenie Konechnykh Raznostey, 2nd edn. Matezis, Odessa (1910) (in Russian)
 12.
MilneThomson, L.M.: The Calculus of Finite Differences. MacMillan & Co., London (1933)
 13.
Nörlund, N.E.: Vorlesungen Über Differenzenrechnung. Springer, Berlin (1924) (in German)
 14.
Stević, S., Diblik, J., Iričanin, B., Šmarda, Z.: On some solvable difference equations and systems of difference equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 541761 (2012)
 15.
Stević, S., Iričanin, B., Kosmala, W., Šmarda, Z.: Note on the bilinear difference equation with a delay. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41, 9349–9360 (2018)
 16.
Stević, S., Iričanin, B., Kosmala, W., Šmarda, Z.: Representation of solutions of a solvable nonlinear difference equation of second order. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2018, Article ID 95 (2018)
 17.
Stević, S., Iričanin, B., Šmarda, Z.: On a symmetric bilinear system of difference equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 89, 15–21 (2019)
 18.
Berg, L., Stević, S.: On some systems of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 1713–1718 (2011)
 19.
Papaschinopoulos, G., Stefanidou, G.: Asymptotic behavior of the solutions of a class of rational difference equations. Int. J. Difference Equ. 5(2), 233–249 (2010)
 20.
Stević, S.: On a twodimensional solvable system of difference equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2018, Article ID 104 (2018)
 21.
Stević, S.: General solutions to four classes of nonlinear difference equations and some of their representations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2019, Article ID 75 (2019)
 22.
Stević, S.: Sixteen practically solvable systems of difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, Article ID 467 (2019)
 23.
Stević, S.: Solvability of a general class of twodimensional hyperboliccotangenttype systems of difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, Article ID 294 (2019)
 24.
Stević, S., Iričanin, B., Kosmala, W.: More on a hyperboliccotangent class of difference equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42, 2974–2992 (2019)
 25.
Stević, S., Tollu, D.T.: Solvability and semicycle analysis of a class of nonlinear systems of difference equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42, 3579–3615 (2019)
 26.
Stević, S., Tollu, D.T.: Solvability of eight classes of nonlinear systems of difference equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42, 4065–4112 (2019)
 27.
Berezansky, L., Braverman, E.: On impulsive Beverton–Holt difference equations and their applications. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 10(9), 851–868 (2004)
 28.
Riordan, J.: Combinatorial Identities. Wiley, New York (1968)
 29.
Vorobiev, N.N.: Fibonacci Numbers. Birkhäuser, Basel (2002)
 30.
Papaschinopoulos, G., Schinas, C.J.: Invariants for systems of two nonlinear difference equations. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. 7, 181–196 (1999)
 31.
Papaschinopoulos, G., Schinas, C.J.: Invariants and oscillation for systems of two nonlinear difference equations. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 46, 967–978 (2001)
 32.
Schinas, C.: Invariants for difference equations and systems of difference equations of rational form. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 216, 164–179 (1997)
 33.
Schinas, C.: Invariants for some difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 212, 281–291 (1997)
 34.
Stević, S.: Solvability of some classes of nonlinear firstorder difference equations by invariants and generalized invariants. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2019, Article ID 36 (2019)
 35.
Stević, S.: Solving a class of nonautonomous difference equations by generalized invariants. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42, 6315–6338 (2019)
 36.
Ahlfors, L.: Complex Analysis, 3rd edn. McGrawHill, New York (1979)
 37.
Krechmar, V.A.: A Problem Book in Algebra. Mir, Moscow (1974)
 38.
Danilov, Yu.A.: Mnogochleny Chebisheva. Vysheyshaya Shkola, Minsk (1984) (in Russian)
 39.
Mitrinović, D.S.: Uvod u Specijalne Funkcije/An Introduction to Special Functions, Treće Izdanje. Gradjevinska Knjiga, Beograd (1986) (in Serbian)
Acknowledgements
The work of Zdeněk Šmarda was supported by the project FEKTS206225 of Brno University of Technology.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
Brno University of Technology, project FEKTS206225.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
The authors have contributed equally to the writing of this paper. They read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stević, S., Iričanin, B., Kosmala, W. et al. Solvability of a class of hyperboliccosinetype difference equations. Adv Differ Equ 2020, 564 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662020030278
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662020030278
MSC
 39A20
 39A06
 39A45
Keywords
 Difference equation
 Solvable equation
 Closedform formula
 Hyperboliccosinetype difference equation