- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Half-linear dynamic equations and investigating weighted Hardy and Copson inequalities
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2020, Article number: 549 (2020)
Abstract
In this paper, we employ some algebraic equations due to Hardy and Littlewood to establish some conditions on weights in dynamic inequalities of Hardy and Copson type. For illustrations, we derive some dynamic inequalities of Wirtinger, Copson and Hardy types and formulate the classical integral and discrete inequalities with sharp constants as particular cases. The results improve some results obtained in the literature.
1 Introduction
Hardy in [12] proved the discrete inequality
where \(a(s)\) is a positive sequence for \(s\geq 1\). In [13] Hardy proved the integral form
where f is a positive function. In [10] Copson considered a new type of inequalities of the form
where f is a positive function and \(q>1\). In [11] Copson (see also [14, Theorem 344]) proved the discrete version of (3), which is given by
where \(q>1\) and \(a(s)>0\) for \(s\geq 0\). In [4] Beesack proved an inequality of the form
where γ and ω satisfy the differential equation of Euler–Lagrange type
The method of the proofs in [4] depends on the solution of (6) when the first derivative \(z^{{\prime }}>0\) on the interval \(( a,b ) \). The approach of Beesack extended to generalized Hardy’s type inequalities; see, e.g., Beesack [5] and Shum [23]. Some of the conditions on z, γ and ω were removed by Tomaselli [26]. In particular Tomaselli followed up the papers by Talenti [24] and [25] and proved some inequalities with some special weighted functions.
The discrete analogues for the continuous results have been considered by some authors, we refer to the articles by Chen [8, 9] and Liao [15]. It is worth to mention here that some parts of the proofs of Liao’s results are based on the technique used in [7] and [14], which are based on the application of the variational principle which is not an easy task to apply on time scales and then we did not consider in our proofs of characterizations of weights of the inequalities that we will consider in our paper. There is thus an urgent need of a new technique that helps us in studying such problems on time scales, which is our main aim in this paper.
The dynamic equations and inequalities have been introduced by Hilger in 1988 and considered by a lot of authors, we refer to Refs. [1–3, 16–20, 27]. One of the applications of Hardy-type inequalities in dynamic equations was demonstrated in [19]. In particular, in [19] the author established a time-scale version of the Hardy inequality, which unifies and extends well-known Hardy inequalities in the continuous and in the discrete setting, and presented an application in the oscillation theory of half-linear dynamic equations to obtain sharp oscillation results. Recently, in [21] the authors established some conditions on the weights of dynamic inequalities of Hardy’s type to be hold. More precisely it has been proved that, if \(1< p\leq q<\infty \),
where \(p^{\ast }\) is the conjugate of \(p>1\), then
where w is a positive function, if and only if there is a number \(\eta >0\), such that the equation
has a solution \(u(s)\) that satisfies
In this paper, we establish some relations between the weights in generalized inequalities of Hardy and Copson type by using the solutions of dynamic equations of half-linear types. The technique in our paper allows us to cover the inequalities with tails of Copson’s type with weights and improve the above results, since our results do not need the restrictive condition (7). In Sect. 2, we are concerned with the presentation of some basic definitions and preliminaries regarding the time-scale calculus. The dynamic Hardy-type inequality of the form
will be proved in Sect. 3, where the method reduces the proofs to the solvability of dynamic equation
where \(u>0, u^{\Delta }>0\). Next, we prove new conditions on weights in the dynamic Copson-type inequality with tail of the form
and we prove that the conditions on the weights reduces to the solvability of the dynamic equation
where \(u>0, u^{\Delta }<0\). To the best of the authors’ knowledge the results in this case are essentially new. For illustration, we derive some dynamic inequalities as special cases and from them we formulate some classical and discrete inequalities.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we present some basic definitions that will be used in the sequel and for more details see [6]. The derivative on time scales of Γϒ and \(\Gamma /\Upsilon \) of two functions Γ and ϒ are given by
The forward jump operator \(\sigma (t)\) on a time scale \(\mathbb{T}\) is defined by \(\sigma (t):=\inf \{s\in \mathbb{T}: s>t\}\) and the graininess function μ is defined by \(\mu (t):=\sigma (t)-t\), and for any function \(\Gamma:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) the notation \(\Gamma ^{\sigma }(t)\) denotes \(\Gamma (\sigma (t))\). The Cauchy (delta)-integral is defined by \(\int _{a}^{t}\Gamma ^{\Delta }(\omega )\Delta \omega =\Gamma (t)- \Gamma (a)\). The integration formula on a discrete time scale reads
while the infinite integral is defined as \(\int _{a}^{\infty }\Gamma (t)\Delta t=\lim_{b\rightarrow \infty } \int _{a}^{b}\Gamma (t)\Delta t\). The chain rule for functions \(\Theta:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), which is continuously differentiable, and \(\Upsilon:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), which is delta-differentiable, is given by
this rule leads to the useful form
Another formula pertaining to the chain rule states that
which provides us with the following useful form:
For \(a,b\in \mathbb{T}\) and \(\Gamma,\Theta \in C_{rd}(\mathbb{T})\), the integration by parts formula is given by
The Hölder inequality on time scales is given by
where \(q>1\) and \(1/q+1/q=1\). We define the time-scale interval \([a,\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) by \([a,\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}:=[a,\infty )\cap \mathbb{T}\).
3 Main results
In this section, we will prove the main results and we begin with inequalities of Hardy’s type with heads. In what follows, all functions in the statements of the theorems are assumed to be rd-continuous, and positive functions (see [6]). The set of all such rd–continuous functions is denoted by \(C_{rd}(\mathbb{T})\). Let \(\gamma, \omega \in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R}^{+})\), and \(\mathcal{S}\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}^{1}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R}^{+})\). Suppose that \(\gamma (t)\) and \(\omega (t)\) satisfy the half-linear dynamic equation of Euler–Lagrange type
for any real number \(\theta >1\), and \(\mathcal{S}(t)>0, \mathcal{S}^{\Delta }(t)>0\) for \(t\in [ \alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\), and define
Definition 3.1
Suppose that \(z\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R}^{+})\). The function z is said to be in the class \(\hat{H}_{1}\) if
and
For convenience sometimes in the computations we skip the argument t.
Lemma 3.1
Assume that α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and suppose that \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nondecreasing. If \(z\in \hat{H}_{1}\), and γ and ω satisfy Eq. (19), then
Proof
From the definition of v and by using the rules of derivative on time scales (15), we have, for \(t\geq \alpha \),
Since
Let \(z=\mathcal{S}\Upsilon \), then we have by employing the product rule of derivative
Also by the product rule of derivative, we have
Substituting (26) and (27) into (28), we obtain
The product rule of derivative now yields
Substituting (30) into (29), we have
which is the desired equation, Eq. (23). The proof is complete. □
Lemma 3.2
Let α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and suppose that \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nondecreasing. \(\mathrm{If} z\in \hat{H}_{1}\), and γ and ω satisfy Eq. (19), then
with \(G\geq 0\). Furthermore, \(G=0\)if and only if \(z=c\mathcal{S}\)with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\).
Proof
From (31), we see that
Let \(z=\mathcal{S}\Upsilon \), then \(z^{\Delta }=\mathcal{S}^{\Delta }\Upsilon ^{\sigma }+\mathcal{S} \Upsilon ^{\Delta }\geq 0\), and
By using Lemma 3.1, we get
Substituting (33) and (34) into (32), we obtain
Since \(\mathcal{S}\) and ϒ are nondecreasing for \(t\in [ \alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\), then \(\mathcal{S}^{\Delta }\geq 0\), and by (17), we get
and then
Substituting (36) into (35), we obtain
By employing the inequality (see [14])
we have
This and (37) imply that \(G\geq 0\) where \(\gamma >0\) on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). Furthermore \(G=0\) if and only if \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). This in fact gives us that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). The proof is complete. □
Theorem 3.1
Let α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nondecreasing. If \(z\in \hat{H}_{1}\), and γ and ω satisfy Eq. (19), then
Furthermore the inequality (39) becomes an equality if and only if \(z=c\mathcal{S}\)with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\).
Proof
From Lemma 3.2, we have
Then
Since \(G(s)\geq 0\), on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\), we get from the last equation
which is the desired inequality (39). Furthermore the inequality (39) becomes equality if and only if \(G(s)=0\), this implies that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }(s)=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). This in fact gives \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). The proof is complete. □
Definition 3.2
Let \(z\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}},\mathbb{R})\) such that \(z\geq 0\) on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). The function z belongs to the class \(\mathcal{H}_{1}\) if
and
Remark 3.1
Obviously \(\mathcal{H}_{1}\subset \hat{H}_{1}\).
Theorem 3.2
Suppose that γ and ω satisfy Eq. (19) and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nondecreasing for \(t\in [ \alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). If \(z\in \mathcal{H}_{1}\)then
If \(z\neq 0\), then inequality (42) becomes equality if and only if \(z\mathcal{S}^{-1}=\mathrm{const}\neq 0\), \(\mathcal{S}\in \hat{H}_{1}\), and
Proof
From (41), we have \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \beta }vz^{\theta }(t)- \lim_{t\rightarrow \alpha }vz^{\theta }(t)\geq 0\). From Theorem 3.1, we see that
which is the desired inequality (42). Furthermore inequality (42) becomes an equality if and only if \(G(t)=0\), this implies that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). This leads to \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). Since \(v=\gamma ( \mathcal{S}^{\Delta } ) ^{\theta -1}\mathcal{S}^{1-\theta }\), and \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\), we have
and
Now by using (41), and (44) and (45), we have
and hence \(\mathcal{S}\in \hat{H}_{1}\). The proof is complete. □
When \(\Upsilon =1\), we have from Theorem 3.2 the result.
Theorem 3.3
Let γ and ω satisfy
such that \(\mathcal{S}(y)>0, \mathcal{S}^{\Delta }(y)>0\). If \(z\in \mathcal{\Upsilon }_{1}\), then
Remark 3.2
If \(\mathbb{T=R}\), then we obtain from Theorem 3.3
where γ and ω verify the differential equation
where \(\mathcal{S}(t)>0, \mathcal{S}^{{\prime }}(t)>0\).
Remark 3.3
For the differential form, we get from Remark 3.2 the Wirtinger inequality
where γ and ω satisfy the differential equation (48) and \(u(0)=0\).
Now, we give some examples for illustration.
Example 3.1
Let \(\mathbb{T=R}\) and α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), such that \(0\leq \alpha <\beta \). Assume that \(\gamma (s)=1\), and \(\mathcal{S}(s)=s^{\frac{\theta -1}{\theta }}\) for \(s\in [ \alpha,\beta ]\) where \(\theta >1\). It is clear that γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\), and
From (48), we have
Now, by applying Theorem 3.2 when \(\mathbb{T=}\mathbb{R}\), we have
which is the Hardy inequality (5) with a sharp constant \(( \theta /(\theta -1) ) ^{\theta }\).
Example 3.2
Let \(\mathbb{T=R}\) and α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), such that \(0\leq \alpha <\beta \). Assume that \(\gamma (s)=s^{\theta -\eta }\), and \(\mathcal{S}=s^{\frac{\eta -1}{\theta }}\) for \(s\in [ \eta,\beta ]\) where \(\eta >1\) is an arbitrary constant. Then γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\), and
From (48), we have
By applying Theorem 3.2 when \(\mathbb{T=R}\), we see that
which is the Hardy–Littlewood inequality with a sharp constant \(( \theta /(\eta -1) ) ^{\theta }\) (see [22]).
Remark 3.4
When \(\mathbb{T=N}\), we obtain from Theorem 3.3 the following inequality:
where u is a positive summable sequence, and the sequences γ and ω satisfy the difference equation
where \(\mathcal{S}(n)>0, \Delta \mathcal{S}(n)>0\).
Example 3.3
Let \(\mathbb{T=N}\) with \([1,N]\subset \mathbb{N}\) such that \(1\leq N<\infty \). Assume that \(\gamma (k)=1\), and \(\mathcal{S}(k)=k^{\frac{\eta -1}{\eta }}\) for \(k\in [ 1,k]\) where \(\eta >1\). It is clear that γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\), and by using the inequality
with \(\gamma = ( \eta -1 ) /\eta <1\), we have
From (49), we have
By applying the inequality
with \(\gamma =-(\eta -1)/\eta <0\), we get
Substituting the last inequality into (51), we get
Now, by applying Remark 3.4, we have
That is,
which is the Hardy inequality (1) with a best constant \(( \eta /(\eta -1) ) ^{\eta }\).
Example 3.4
Let \(\mathbb{T=N}\) with \(k\in \mathbb{N}\), and \(1\leq k<\infty \). Assume that \(\gamma (k)=k^{\eta -\alpha }\), and \(\mathcal{S}(k)=k^{\frac{\alpha -1}{\eta }}\) for \(k\in [ 1,N]\) where \(\alpha >1\) is an arbitrary constant. Then γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\) and
As in Example 3.3, we have from (48)
By applying Remark 3.4, we see that
which is the discrete Hardy–Littlewood inequality with a best constant \(( \eta /(\alpha -1) ) ^{\eta }\) (see [3]).
Now, we will prove some characterizations of the weights of the inequalities of Copson’s type with tails on time scales. Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a time scale with \(\alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{T}\). Assume that \(\gamma, \omega \in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R}^{+})\), and \(\mathcal{S}\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}^{1}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R}^{+})\). Let θ be any real number such that \(\theta >1\), and let γ and ω satisfy dynamic equation of the Euler–Lagrange type
where \(\mathcal{S}(t)>0, \mathcal{S}^{\Delta }(t)<0\) for \(t\in [ \alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\), and define
Definition 3.3
Assume that \(z\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R})\) such that \(z\geq 0\) on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). We say that \(z\in \hat{H}_{2}\) if
and
Lemma 3.3
Suppose that α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nonincreasing. If \(z\in \hat{H}_{2}\), and γ and ω satisfy the dynamic equation (53) then
Proof
From the definition of v and by using the rules (15) for \(t\geq \alpha \), we have
Since
from (53) and (59), we see that (note \(\mathcal{S}^{\Delta }<0\))
Let \(z=\mathcal{S}\Upsilon \), then we have
Substituting (60) and (61) into
we obtain
By using the product rule, we see that
Substituting (63) into (62), we have
Since \(z=\mathcal{S}\Upsilon \geq 0\), we get (note that \(\vert \mathcal{S}^{\Delta } \vert =-\mathcal{S}^{\Delta }\))
which is the desired equation, Eq. (57). The proof is complete. □
Lemma 3.4
Suppose that α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nonincreasing. If \(z\in \hat{H}_{2}\), and γ and ω satisfy the dynamic equation (53) then
with \(G\geq 0\). Furthermore, \(G=0\)if and only if \(z=c\mathcal{S}\)with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\).
Proof
From (64), we see that
Let \(z=\mathcal{S}\Upsilon \), then \(z^{\Delta }=\mathcal{S}^{\Delta }\Upsilon ^{\sigma }+\mathcal{S} \Upsilon ^{\Delta }\leq 0\), we have
By using Lemma 3.3, we get
Substituting (66) and (67) into (65), we obtain
Since \(\mathcal{S}\) and ϒ are nonincreasing for \(t\in [ \alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\), then, by using the chain rule (17), we see that
Substituting (69) into (68), we obtain
By using the inequality (38) and proceeding as in the proof of Lemma 3.2 we can prove that \(G\geq 0\), since \(\gamma >0\) on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). Furthermore, \(G=0\) if and only if \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). This implies that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). The proof is complete. □
Theorem 3.4
Suppose that α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nonincreasing. If \(z\in \hat{H}_{2}\), and γ and ω satisfy the dynamic equation (53) then
holds on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). Furthermore, inequality (70) becomes an equality if and only if \(z=c\mathcal{S}\)with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\).
Proof
From Lemma 3.4, we see that
Then
Since \(G\geq 0\), on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\),
which is the desired inequality (70). Furthermore, the inequality (70) becomes an equality if and only if \(G(t)=0\), this implies that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). This yields \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). The proof is complete. □
Definition 3.4
Let \(z\in \mathrm{C}_{rd}([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{R})\) such that \(z\geq 0\) on \([\alpha,\beta ]_{\mathbb{T}}\). We say that \(z\in \mathcal{H}_{2}\) if
and
Remark 3.5
Obviously \(\mathcal{H}_{2}\subset \hat{H}_{2}\).
Theorem 3.5
Suppose that α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{T}\)and \(\mathcal{S}(t)\)and \(\Upsilon (t)\)are nonincreasing. If \(z\in \mathcal{H}_{2}\), then
If \(z\neq 0\), then inequality (73) becomes an equality if and only if \(z\mathcal{S}^{-1}=\mathrm{const}\neq 0\), \(\mathcal{S}\in \hat{H}_{2}\), and
Proof
From (72), we have \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \beta } ( vz^{\theta } ) (t)- \lim_{t\rightarrow \alpha } ( vz^{\theta } ) (t) \geq 0\). By applying Theorem (3.4), we obtain
which is the desired inequality (73). Furthermore, inequality (73) reduces to an equality if and only if \(G(t)=0\), this implies that \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }=0\), where \(\Upsilon =z\mathcal{S}^{-1}\). Thus \(\Upsilon ^{\Delta }= ( z\mathcal{S}^{-1} ) ^{\Delta }=0\), and then \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\). Since \(v=-\gamma ( -\mathcal{S}^{\Delta } ) ^{\theta -1}\mathcal{S}^{1-\theta }\), and \(z=c\mathcal{S}\) with \(c=\mathrm{const}\geq 0\), this implies that
and
Now, by using (72), we have
and then \(\mathcal{S}\in \hat{H}\). The proof is complete. □
Remark 3.6
When \(\mathbb{T=R}\), we have from Theorem 3.5
where γ and ω satisfy
where \(x(t)>0, x^{{\prime }}(t)<0\).
Remark 3.7
As a special case of (75), we get the Wirtinger type inequality
where γ and ω satisfy the differential equation (76) and \(u(\beta )=0\).
We give some examples for illustration.
Example 3.5
Let \(\mathbb{T=R}\) with α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), and \(0\leq \alpha <\beta \leq \infty \) and assume that \(\gamma (s)=s^{\theta -\gamma }\), and \(\mathcal{S}=s^{\frac{\gamma -1}{\theta }}\), where \(0\leq \gamma <1<\theta \) is an arbitrary constant. Then γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\) for \(s\in [ \alpha,\beta ]\), and
From (76), we have
By applying Remark 3.6, we see that
which is the Hardy–Littlewood inequality with a sharp constant \(( \theta /(1-\gamma ) ) ^{\theta }\) (see [22]).
Example 3.6
Let \(\mathbb{T=R}\) with α, \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), and \(0\leq \alpha <\beta \leq \infty \) and assume that \(\gamma (s)=s^{\theta }\), and \(\mathcal{S}(s)=s^{\frac{-1}{\theta }}\) where \(\theta >1\). It is clear that γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\), and
From (76), we have
Now, by applying Remark 3.6, we have
which is the Hardy inequality (6) with a best constant \(\theta ^{\theta }\).
Remark 3.8
When \(\mathbb{T=N}\), we have from Theorem 3.5 the inequality
where u is a positive summable sequence over any finite interval \((1,k)\),and the sequences γ and ω satisfy the difference equation
where \(\mathcal{S}(n)>0, \Delta \mathcal{S}(n)<0\).
Example 3.7
Let \(\mathbb{T=N}\) with \(N\in \mathbb{N}\), and \(1< N\leq \infty \) and assume that \(\gamma (\varrho )=(\varrho +1)^{\theta -\gamma }\), and \(\mathcal{S}(\varrho )=\varrho ^{\frac{\gamma -1}{\theta }}\), where \(\theta >1\), and \(1>\gamma \geq 0\) is an arbitrary constant. Then γ, \(\mathcal{S}>0\), and by using the inequality
with \(\alpha = ( \gamma -1 ) /\theta <0\), we have
This implies that
and
By using the inequality
with \(\alpha = ( 1-\gamma ) /\theta <1\), we have
From (77), we have
where
Now, by applying Remark 3.8, we have
That is,
which is the discrete Hardy–Littlewood inequality with a sharp constant \(( \theta /(1-\gamma ) ) ^{\theta }\).
References
Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M., Řehák, P.: Half-linear dynamic equations. In: V. Lakshmikantham on His 80th Birthday. Nonl. Anal. Appl., vol. 1, 2, pp. 1–57. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2003)
Agarwal, R.P., O’Regan, D., Saker, S.H.: Dynamic Inequalities on Time Scales. Springer, Cham (2014)
Agarwal, R.P., O’Regan, D., Saker, S.H.: Hardy Type Inequalities on Time Scales. Springer, Cham (2016)
Beesack, P.R.: Hardy’s inequality and its extensions. Pac. J. Math. 11, 39–61 (1961)
Beesack, P.R.: Integral inequalities involving a function and its derivatives. Am. Math. Mon. 78, 705–741 (1971)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Application. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)
Buttazzo, G., Giaquinta, M., Hildebrandt, S.: One-Dimensional Variational Problems: An Introduction. Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 15. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)
Chen, M.F.: Bilateral Hardy-type inequalities. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 29(1), 1–32 (2013)
Chen, M.F.: The optimal constant in Hardy-type inequalities. Acta Math. Sin. 31(5), 731–754 (2015)
Copson, E.T.: Note on series of positive terms. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 9–12 (1927)
Copson, E.T.: Note on series of positive terms. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 3, 49–51 (1928)
Hardy, G.H.: Note on a theorem of Hilbert. Math. Z. 6, 314–317 (1920)
Hardy, G.H.: Notes on some points in the integral calculus (LX): an inequality between integrals. Messenger Math. 54, 150–156 (1925)
Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Polya, G.: Inequalities, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1952)
Liao, Z.W.: Discrete Hardy-type inequalities. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 15, 805–834 (2015)
Mehrez, K., Agarwal, P.: New Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities for convex functions and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 350, 274–285 (2019)
Řehák, P.: Half-linear dynamic equations on time scales: IVP and oscillatory properties. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 7, 361–403 (2002)
Řehák, P.: On certain comparison theorems for half-linear dynamic equations on time scales. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2004, 551–565 (2004)
Řehák, P.: Hardy inequality on time scales and its application to half-linear dynamic equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2005(5), 495–507 (2005)
Řehák, P.: Peculiarities in power type comparison results for half-linear dynamic equations. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 42, 1995–2013 (2012)
Saker, S.H., Mahmoud, R.R.: A connection between weighted Hardy’s inequality and half-linear dynamic equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019(1), 129 (2019)
Shum, D.T.: On integral inequalities related to Hardy’s. Can. Math. Bull. 14, 225–230 (1971)
Shum, D.T.: On a class of new inequalities. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 204, 299–341 (1975)
Talenti, G.: Una diseguaglianza integrale. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. (3) 21, 25–34 (1966)
Talenti, G.: Sopra una diseguaglianza integrale. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. (3) 21, 167–188 (1967)
Tomaselli, G.: A class of inequalities. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. (4) 2, 622–631 (1969)
Xiaohong, L., Zhang, L., Agarwal, P., Wang, G.: On some new integral inequalities of Gronwall–Bellman–Bihari type with delay for discontinuous functions and their applications. Indag. Math. 27(1), 1–10 (2016)
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saker, S.H., Sayed, A.G., AlNemer, G. et al. Half-linear dynamic equations and investigating weighted Hardy and Copson inequalities. Adv Differ Equ 2020, 549 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03006-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03006-z