Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Table 2 Comparisons between IOCM, N2LIM and \(T_{f} =50\), \(B_{1} =100\), \(C =1000\)

From: Optimal control for cancer treatment mathematical model using Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo fractional derivative

α

Methods

\(J ( u_{A}^{*}, u_{M}^{*} )\)

1

IOCM

4.4325 × 104

N2LIM

2.3616 × 104

0.98

IOCM

4.3766 × 104

N2LIM

2.0580 × 104

0.90

IOCM

3.9290 × 104

N2LIM

9.8979 × 103

0.80

IOCM

3.0162 × 104

N2LIM

4.6516 × 103

0.70

IOCM

1.5232 × 104

N2LIM

3.0171 × 103

0.60

IOCM

7.1517 × 103

N2LIM

2.6444 × 103