Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Table 7 The comparison of \(S^{(3)}\) solution obtained by DTM, RDTM [40], and q-HATM with the exact solution Equation (32) in terms of absolute error when \(\alpha =1\), \(\hbar =-1\), \(k=\eta =0.1\), \(p=1.5\), \(r=-1.5\), and \(n=1\) for Example 4.1

From: A reliable technique to study nonlinear time-fractional coupled Korteweg–de Vries equations

x

t

DTM [40]

RDTM [40]

q-HATM

0.2

0.1

5.63621150 × 10−10

1.56042290 × 10−10

1.56042734 × 10−10

0.4

5.68117962 × 10−08

5.54534330 × 10−08

5.54534325 × 10−08

0.7

6.66098903 × 10−07

6.63837052 × 10−07

6.63837052 × 10−07

1

3.35673755 × 10−06

3.35365276 × 10−06

3.35365276 × 10−06

0.5

0.1

2.12791820 × 10−08

3.57261776 × 10−10

3.57261776 × 10−10

0.4

1.64465393 × 10−07

1.06591274 × 10−07

1.06591274 × 10−07

0.7

1.23169306 × 10−06

1.13888355 × 10−06

1.13888355 × 10−06

1

5.43336084 × 10−06

5.30892913 × 10−06

5.30892913 × 10−06

0.8

0.1

1.70237973 × 10−07

5.53058488 × 10−10

5.53058932 × 10−10

0.4

5.66500685 × 10−07

1.56115444 × 10−07

1.56115444 × 10−07

0.7

2.23353809 × 10−06

1.59675253 × 10−06

1.59675253 × 10−06

1

8.02493433 × 10−06

7.18451241 × 10−06

7.18451242 × 10−06

1

0.1

4.67602796 × 10−07

6.79135415 × 10−10

6.79134970 × 10−10

0.4

1.23973634 × 10−06

1.87873466 × 10−07

1.87873466 × 10−07

0.7

3.48931405 × 10−06

1.88914547 × 10−06

1.88914547 × 10−06

1

1.04684751 × 10−05

8.37722635 × 10−06

8.37722635 × 10−06