Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Table 3 MAUBs h for different μ (Example 3)

From: An enhanced stability criterion for linear time-delayed systems via new Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals

Delay sets

Methodsμ

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.8

NoVs

\(\mathcal{H}_{1}\)

[34] (Th. 1)

4.753

3.873

2.429

2.183

\(27n^{2}+4n\)

[24] (Th. 2 C2.)

4.714

3.855

2.608

2.375

\(23n^{2}+4n\)

[23] (Th. 1)

4.788

4.065

3.055

2.615

\(65n^{2}+11n\)

[26] (Th. 2 C2.)

4.809

4.091

3.109

2.710

\(25n^{2} + 7n\)

[35] (Th. 1)

4.829

4.139

3.155

2.730

\(142n^{2} + 18n\)

[36] (Th. 1)

4.831

4.142

3.148

2.713

\(114n^{2} + 18n\)

[37] (Th. 3)

4.844

4.142

3.117

2.698

\(70n^{2}+12n\)

[38] (Th. 1)

4.883

4.167

3.163

2.730

\(91.5n^{2}+4.5n\)

[28] (Pro. 1)

4.910

4.233

3.309

2.882

\(54.5n^{2}+6.5n\)

[32] (Th. 8 N = 2)

4.930

4.220

3.090

2.660

\(62.5n^{2}+6.5n\)

[27] (Th. 2 N = 2)

4.900

4.190

3.160

2.730

\(65n^{2}+8n\)

[11] (Th. 1)

4.942

4.234

3.309

2.882

\(108n^{2}+12n\)

[39] (Th. 3)

4.944

4.274

3.305

2.850

\(203n^{2}+9n\)

Theorem 1

5.102

4.402

3.411

2.981

\(90n^{2}+13n\)

Percentage over [39]

3.20%

3.00%

3.21%

4.60%

\(\mathcal{H}_{2}\)

[32] (Th. 8 N = 2)

6.172

6.164

5.07

3.94

\(62.5n^{2}+6.5n\)

Theorem 1

6.168

6.168

5.97

5.43

\(90n^{2}+13n\)

Percentage over [39]

24.76%

44.31%

80.64%

90.53%

Percentage over [32]

−0.07%

0.06%

17.75%

37.82%

Percentage over \(\mathcal{H}_{1}\)

13.36%

24.75%

30.64%

19.00%