 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Application of fractional differential equations to heat transfer in hybrid nanofluid: modeling and solution via integral transforms
Advances in Difference Equationsvolume 2019, Article number: 52 (2019)
Abstract
This article deals with the generalization of natural convection flow of \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) hybrid nanofluid in two infinite vertical parallel plates. To demonstrate the flow phenomena in two parallel plates of hybrid nanofluids, the Brinkman type fluid model together with the energy equation is considered. The Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative and the Laplace transform technique are used to developed exact analytical solutions for velocity and temperature profiles. The general solutions for velocity and temperature profiles are brought into light through numerical computation and graphical representation. The obtained results show that the velocity and temperature profiles show dual behaviors for \(0 < \alpha < 1\) and \(0 < \beta < 1\) where α and β are the fractional parameters. It is noticed that, for a shorter time, the velocity and temperature distributions decrease with increasing values of the fractional parameters, whereas the trend reverses for a longer time. Moreover, it is found that the velocity and temperature profiles oppositely behave for the volume fraction of hybrid nanofluids.
Introduction
In recent decades, it was acknowledged that fractional operators are appropriate tools for differentiation as compared to the local differentiation particularly in physical real word problems. These fractional operators can be constructed by the convolutions of the local derivative as the kernel of fractional operators; various kernels for fractional operators have been suggested in the literature but the most common is the power law kernel (\(x^{  \alpha} \)), which is used in the construction of Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional operators (see [1], p. 65–106). However, the exponential decay law \(\exp (  \alpha x )\) was used by Caputo and Fabrizio (see [2], p. 1–13). Atangana and Baleanu developed fractional operators in the Caputo and Riemann–Liouville sense using the generalized Mittag–Leffler law \(E_{\alpha} (  \phi x^{\alpha} )\) as a kernel (see [3], p. 763–769). All these fractional operators have some shortcomings and challenges but at the same time this area is growing fast, and researchers devoted their attention to this field (see [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and the references therein).
It is important to mention here that fractional order calculus has many applications in almost every field of science and technology which includes diffusion, relaxation process, control, electrochemistry and viscoelasticity (see [11], p. 79–85). Zafar and Fetecau ([12], p. 2789–2769) applied Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative to the flow of Newtonian viscous fluid flowing over the infinite vertical plate. Markis et al. ([13], p. 1663–1679) analyzed the flow of a fractional Maxwell’s fluid. According to their report, the fractional results showed excellent agreement with experimental work by adjusting the fractional parameter. Alkahtani and Atangana ([14], p. 106–113) used different fractional operators to analyze the memory effect in a potential energy field caused by a charge. They presented some novel numerical approaches to the solutions of a fractional system of equations. Vieru et al. ([15], p. 85–96) presented exact solutions for the timefraction model of viscous fluid flow near a vertical plate taking into consideration mass diffusion and Newtonian heating. Abro et al. ([16], p. 1–10) presented exact analytical solutions for the flow of an OldroydB fluid in a horizontal circular pipe. Jain ([17], p. 1–11) introduced a novel and powerful numerical scheme and implemented to different fractional order differential equations. Some other interesting and significant studies on fractional derivatives can be found in [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and the references therein.
The nanofluid is an innovation of nanotechnology to overcome the problems of heat transport in many engineering and industrial sectors. A detailed discussion on nanofluids with a list of applications is reported by Wang et al. ([27], p. 1–19) in a review paper. Sheikholeslam et al. ([28], p. 71–82) numerically studied the shape effect and the external magnetic field effect on the \(F_{3}O_{4}  H_{2}0\) nanofluid inside a porous enclosure. Hassanan et al. ([29], p. 482–488) developed exact solutions for nanofluids with different nanoparticles for the unsteady flow of a micropolar fluid. The literature of nanofluids has exponentially increased and has reached a next level by introducing hybrid nanofluids which are the suspensions of two or more types of nanoparticles in the composite form with low concentration. Hybrid nanofluids are introduced to overcome the drawbacks of single nanoparticle suspensions and connect the synergetic effect of nanoparticles. The hybrid nanofluid is branded to further improve the thermal conductivity and heat transport, which leads to industrial and engineering applications with low cost (see [30], p. 262–273). Hussain et al. ([31], p. 1054–1066) carried out an entropy generation analysis on a hybrid nanofluid in a cavity. Farooq et al. ([32], p. 1–14) presented a numerical study on hybrid nanofluids keeping into consideration suction/injection, entropy generation, and viscous dissipation.
In the existing literature, experimental, theoretical and numerical studies on hybrid nanofluids are very limited. A study of a hybrid nanofluid fluid with exact solutions and the Caputo fractional derivative even does not exist. So, there is an urgent need to contribute to the literature of hybrid nanofluids using the application of fractional differential equations. Motivated by the above discussion, the present study focused on the heat transfer in hybrid nanofluid in two vertical parallel plates using fractional derivative approach. A waterbased hybrid nanofluid is characterized here with composite hybrid nanoparticles of cupper (Cu) and alumina (\(Al_{2}O_{3}\)). The fractional Brinkman type fluid model with physical initial and boundary conditions is considered for the flow phenomena. The Laplace transform technique is used to obtain exact analytical solutions for the velocity and temperature profiles. Using the properties of the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative the obtained solutions are reduced to the classical form for \(\alpha = 1\) and \(\beta = 1\). To explore the physical aspect of the flow parameters the solutions are numerically computed and plotted in different graphs with a physical explanation.
Problem’s description
Let us consider the unsteady free convection flow of a generalized incompressible hybrid nanofluid in two infinite vertical parallel plates at a distance d. The plates are taken along the xaxis and the yaxis is chosen normal to it. At \(t \le 0\), the plates and fluid are at rest with ambient temperature \(T_{0}\). After \(t = 0^{ +} \), the temperature of the plate at \(y = d\) rises or lowers from \(T_{0}\) to \(T_{W}\) due to which the free convection takes place. At this moment, the fluid starts motion in the x− direction due to the temperature gradient which gives rise to the buoyancy forces. The Brinkman type fluid model is utilized to describe flow phenomena of the hybrid nanofluid. Under the assumptions of ([33], p. 1472–1488) the governing equations of the \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) hybrid nanofluid are given by
together with the following appropriate initial and boundary conditions:
where \(\rho_{hnf}\) is the density, \(u ( y,t )\) is the velocity, \(\beta_{b}^{*}\) is the Brinkmann parameter, \(\mu_{hnf}\) is the dynamic viscosity, \(\beta_{hnf}\) is the volumetric thermal expansion, \(( C_{p} )_{hnf}\) is the specific heat, \(T ( y,t )\) is the temperature, \(k_{hnf}\) is the thermal conductivity and \(Q_{0}\) is the heat generation of the hybrid nanofluid.
Thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluid
This section demonstrates the modification of thermophysical properties of a conventional nanofluid and a hybrid nanofluid \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) in a spherical shape.
The effective density
The effective density \(\rho_{nf}\) of conventional nanofluid is defined by Aminossadati and Ghasemi (see [34], p. 630–640) and can be expressed as
where ϕ is the volume concentration of the nanoparticles, \(\rho_{f}\) and \(\rho_{s}\) are the densities of the base fluid and solid particles respectively. The mathematical expression for the effective density of the hybrid nanofluid can be obtained by modifying Eq. (5) (see [31], p. 1054–1066):
where \(\rho_{hnf}\) is the density of the hybrid nanofluid, \(\phi_{hnf}\) is the volume concentration of solid particles such that \(\phi_{hnf} = \phi_{Al_{2}O_{3}} + \phi_{Cu}\), \(\rho_{f}\) is the density of the base fluid, \(\phi_{Al_{2}O_{3}}\) is the volume concentration of alumina, \(\rho_{Al_{2}O_{2}}\) is the density of alumina, \(\phi_{Cu}\) is the volume concentration of cupper and \(\rho_{Cu}\) is the density of cupper.
The effective dynamic viscosity
The dynamics viscosity \(\mu_{nf}\) of an ordinary nanofluid is expressed by Brinkman (see [35], p. 571) by
which leads to the following modified form for a hybrid nanofluid:
The effective volumetric thermal expansion and heat capacitance
The thermal expansion and heat capacitance are, respectively, defined by Bourantas and Loukopoulos (see [36], p. 35–41) in the form
with the following altered form for a hybrid nanofluid:
The effective thermal conductivity
The effective thermal conductivity for a conventional nanofluid is based on Maxwell’s model (see [37], p. 87–92), which is defined by
where \(K_{nf}\) is the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid, \(K_{s}\) is the thermal conductivity of solid nanometersized particles and \(K_{f}\) is the thermal conductivity of the base fluid. For the hybrid nanofluid, Maxwell’s model can be modified:
It is important to highlight here that by making \(\phi_{Al_{2}O_{3}} = 0\) or \(\phi_{Cu} = 0\) the effective thermophysical properties of the hybrid nanofluid presented in Eqs. (8), (11), (12) and (14) can be reduced to the effective thermophysical properties of a conventional nanofluid presented in Eqs. (7), (9), (10) and (13), respectively. Furthermore, the typo mistake made in [31], p. 1054–1066) and [32], p. 1–14 has been corrected here in the expression of the thermal conductivity for the hybrid nanofluid. The numerical values of the base fluid and nanoparticles are given in Table 1.
Generalization of local model
In this section, the dimensional system is first transformed to dimensionless form using nonsimilarity variables to reduce the number of variables and get rid of units. The dimensionless system is then artificially converted to timefractional form or generalized form using the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator (see [2], p. 1–13). It is worth to mention here that the fractional models are more general and convenient in the description of flow behavior and memory effect. Moreover, the results obtained from the fractional model are additionally realistic because by adjusting the fractional parameter the obtained results can be compared with experimental data to reach excellent agreement as obtained by Markis et al. (see [13], p. 1663–1679). Now introducing the following nonsimilarity dimensionless variables:
into Eqs. (1)–(4) yields the following:
where
is the dimensionless Brinkman type fluid parameter, the thermal Grashof number, the Prandtl number and heat generation parameter, respectively. Here \(\lambda_{hnf}, a_{0}, a_{1}, a_{2} \mbox{ and } a_{3}\) are the constant terms produced during the calculation. The timefractional form of Eqs. (15) and (16) in terms of Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator is given by
where \({}^{CF}D_{\tau}^{\alpha} v ( \xi,\tau )\), and \({}^{CF}D_{\tau}^{\beta} \theta ( \xi,\tau )\) is for the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operators of fractional order α and β. Equations (19) and (20) are the Caputo–Fabrizio generalized form of Eqs. (15) and (16), while the initial and boundary conditions will remain the same as in Eqs. (17) and (18). The Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator is defined by (see [2], p. 1–13)
which is the convolution product of the function \(\frac{N ( \delta )}{1  \delta} \exp (  \frac{\delta t}{1  \delta} )\) and \(f ( t )\) of fractional order δ. In this study the following two properties of Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator will be utilized.

1.
Property 1: According to Losanda and Nieto (see [38], p. 87–92) \(N ( \delta )\) is the normalization function such that
$$ N ( 1 ) = N ( 0 ) = 1. $$(22) 
2.
Property 2: taking into consideration Eq. (22), the Laplace transform of Eq. (21) yields
$$ L \bigl\{ {}^{CF}D_{t}^{\delta} f ( t ) \bigr\} ( q ) = \frac{q\bar{f} ( q )  f ( 0 )}{ ( 1  \delta )q + \delta},\quad 0 < \delta < 1, $$(23)such that
$$ \lim_{\delta \to 1} \bigl[ L \bigl\{ {}^{CF}D_{t}^{\delta} f ( t ) \bigr\} ( q ) \bigr] = \lim_{\delta \to 1} \biggl\{ \frac{q\bar{f} ( q )  f ( 0 )}{ ( 1  \delta )q + \delta} \biggr\} = q\bar{f} ( q )  f ( 0 ) = L \biggl\{ \frac{\partial f ( t )}{\partial t} \biggr\} , $$(24)where \(\bar{f} ( q )\) is the Laplace transform of \(f ( t )\) and \(f ( 0 )\) is the initial value of the function.
Solution of the problem
To solve Eqs. (19) and (20) the Laplace transform method \(L \{ f ( t ) \} ( q ) = \bar{f} ( q ) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f ( t )e^{  qt}\,dt\), will be applied by using the corresponding initial and boundary conditions from Eqs. (17) and (18) to develop exact analytical solutions for the velocity and temperature profiles.
Solutions of the energy equation
Applying the Laplace transform to Eq. (20) keeping in mind the definition and properties of the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator defined in Eq. (21)–(24) and using the corresponding initial condition from Eq. (17) yield
and after further simplification of Eq. (25)
with transformed boundary conditions
where
The exact solution of Eq. (26) using the corresponding boundary conditions from Eq. (27) is given by
Equation (28) represents the solutions of the energy equation in the Laplace transformed domain. In order to invert the Laplace transform, this equation can be written in a more suitable and simplified form:
Let us consider
where
Upon taking the inverse Laplace transform, Eq. (30) yields
and to derive the functions \(\theta_{1} ( \xi,\tau )\) and \(\theta_{2} ( \xi,\tau )\), the compound formula for the Laplace inversion is used. The function \(\bar{\varPhi} ( \xi,q )\) is chosen as
According to Khan (see [39], p. 397–401), the inverse Laplace transform of the functions \(\bar{\varPhi} ( \xi,q )\) can be obtained as
where
and
The values of functions \(f ( ( 1 + 2n  \xi ),u )\) and \(g ( u,\tau )\), defined in Eqs. (36) and (37), are used in Eq. (35) yielding the following simplified form:
To evaluate the function \(\theta_{1} ( \xi,\tau )\), we need to find the convolution product of \(L^{  1} \{ \frac{1}{q} \} = 1\) and the function \(\bar{\varPhi} ( \xi,q )\) which yields
Similarly, the function \(\theta_{2} ( \xi,\tau )\) is given by
To reduce the solutions obtained in Eq. (33) to classical or local form, Eq. (24) is used for the following.
For \(\beta \to 1\), Eq. (24) is used which reduced Eq. (25) to the following form:
With the solutions in the Laplace transform domain one finds
After further simplification, Eq. (42) takes the following form:
Taking the inverse Laplace transform, Eq. (43) gives the following local solutions for the temperature profile:
where
Solution of momentum equation
Applying the Laplace transform on Eq. (19) using the corresponding initial condition from Eq. (15) yields
After further simplification of Eq. (47)
where
In the Laplace transform domain, the exact solution of Eq. (48) is given by
where
In order to find the inverse Laplace transform, Eq. (49) can be written in a more convenient and simplified form as
Let us consider
Here
and taking the inverse Laplace transform yields
where ∗ represents a convolution product and the terms \(v_{2} ( \xi,\tau )\), \(v_{3} ( \xi,\tau ) v_{4} ( \xi,\tau )\) and \(v_{5} ( \xi,\tau )\) are given by
where
The term \(v_{1} ( \xi,\tau )\) is numerically obtained using Zakian’s algorithm. In the literature, it is proven that the Zakian algorithm is a stable way for the inverse Laplace transform because the truncated error for five multiple terms is negligible ([40], p. 83).
For the velocity profile, the local solutions can be recovered by making \(\alpha,\beta \to 1\) in Eq. (47) which leads to the following solutions in the Laplace transform domain:
with the following simplified form:
where
The inverse Laplace transform of Eq. (63) yields
where
Results and discussion
In this article, the idea of the fractional derivative is used for the generalization of the free convection flow of the hybrid nanofluid. The governing equations of the Brinkman type fluid along with the energy equation is fractionalized using the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative. The fractional PDEs are more general and are known as master PDEs. The momentum and energy equations are solved analytically using the Laplace transform technique. The obtained results are displayed in various graphs to study the influence of the pertinent corresponding parameters, such as the fractional parameters \(\alpha \mbox{ and } \beta\), the volume fraction of hybrid nanofluid \(\phi_{hnf}\), the heat generation parameter Q, the Brinkman parameter \(\beta_{b}\) and the thermal Grashof number Gr on velocity and temperature profiles.
Figures 1(a) and (b) and 2(a) and (b) depict the impact of the fractional parameter α and β on the velocity and temperature profiles. From these figures, it is noticed that the velocity and the temperature profiles show the same trend for variations in the fractional parameters. The velocity and temperature profiles exhibited increasing behavior for increasing values of α, β for a longer time. When \(\alpha,\beta\) are increased, the thickness of thermal and momentum boundary layers are increased and become thickest at \(\alpha,\beta = 1\), which corresponds to the increasing performance of the velocity and temperature profiles. This trend of the fractional parameter is the same here for velocity and temperature profiles as reported by ([25], p. 7) for fractional nanofluids using the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivatives. But this effect reverses for a shorter time in the case of fractional velocity and temperature distributions.
The influence of \(\phi_{hnf}\) on the velocity and temperature profiles is studied in Figs. 3 and 4. The trends of velocity and temperature profiles are opposite to each other. The hybrid nanofluid velocity decreases with increasing \(\phi_{hnf}\). This can be physically justified as the hybrid nanofluid became more viscous with increasing \(\phi_{hnf}\), which leads to a decrease in the nanofluid velocity. Nevertheless, the temperature profile increases with increase in \(\phi_{hnf}\) when the temperature is less than 180°C. The is due to the thermal conductivity enhancing with the enhancement of \(\phi_{hnf}\) and the hybrid nanofluid conducting more heat as a result of heat transfer increases, which leads to an increase in the temperature profile.
In Figs. 5 and 6 the temperature and velocity profiles are compared for \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\), \(Cu  H_{2}O\), \(Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) and pure water. It is noticed that the temperature profile is higher for \(Cu  H_{2}O\) followed by \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\), \(Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) and pure water. This due to the fact that the thermal conductivity of Cu is higher than hybrid nanoparticles, alumina, and pure water. But the hybrid nanofluid is more stable. In the case of the velocity profile, the velocity of \(Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) is higher, followed by the velocity of \(Cu  Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\), \(Cu  H_{2}O\) and pure water. It can be physically justified as the \(Al_{2}O_{3}\) conducting a high quantity of heat due to the effective thermal conductivity but being less dense. Therefore, the velocity of \(Al_{2}O_{3}  H_{2}O\) is higher among all the fluids under consideration.
Figures 7 and 8 depict the influence of Q on velocity and temperature profiles. It is found that the velocity and temperature distributions increase with increasing values of Q. When a larger value is assigned to Q this means that the system absorbed more heat due to which the intermolecular attractive force became weaker; as a result, the temperature and velocity profiles increase. The effect of the Brinkman parameter is presented in Fig. 9. It is noticed that the velocity distribution decreases with increasing values of \(\beta_{b}\). The higher values \(\beta_{b}\) correspond to stronger drag forces, which lead to the retardation of the velocity profile. The same effect of \(\beta_{b}\) is reported by [33].
The effect of Gr is studied in Fig. 10 for negative and positive values. Positive values of Gr correspond to heating of the plate, while negative values correspond to cooling of the plate. In this figure, it is noticed that for greater values of Gr the velocity profile shows an increasing trend. This is because when Gr is increased the buoyancy forces become stronger due to which more convection takes place; as a result, the velocity profile increases. But this effect reverses for negative values of Gr due to cooling of the plate.
Concluding remarks
In this article, the idea of free convection is generalized using the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative. The natural convection flow of a hybrid nanofluid in two vertical infinite parallel plates is studied. Exact analytical solutions are developed for temperature and velocity profiles via the Laplace transform technique. The effects of various pertinent parameters are numerically studied through graphs and discuss physically. The major points extracted from this study are as follows:

The velocity and temperature profiles show an increasing behavior for increasing values \(\alpha \mbox{ and } \beta\) being most dominant for \(\alpha,\beta = 1\) for a larger time. But this effect reverses for a shorter time.

The fractional velocity and temperature are more general. Hence, the numerical values for \(v ( \xi,\tau )\) and \(\theta ( \xi,\tau )\) can be calculated for any value of \(\alpha \mbox{ and } \beta\) such that \(0 < \alpha,\beta < 1\).

The temperature distribution shows a very similar variation for different shapes of the hybrid nanoparticles, so the density of the nanoparticles is a significant factor as compared to thermal conductivity.

The velocity profile decreases with increasing values of \(\phi_{hnf}\) but this effect is opposite in the case of the temperature profile.

With increasing values of Gr, the free convection became dominant, increasing the nanofluid velocity for positive values but this trend reverses for negative values of Gr.

The velocity retards for larger values of \(\beta_{b}\) due the enhancement in the drag forces.
References
 1.
Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications, vol. 198. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)
 2.
Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 1–13 (2015)
 3.
Atangana, A., Baleanu, D.: New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and nonsingular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 4(2), 763–769 (2016)
 4.
Baleanu, D., Agheli, B., Darzi, R.: An optimal method for approximating the delay differential equations of noninteger order. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018(1), 284 (2018)
 5.
Saqib, M., Khan, I., Shafie, S.: Natural convection channel flow of cmcbased cnts nanofluid. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133(12), 549 (2018)
 6.
Khalil, R., Al Horani, M., Anderson, D.: Undetermined coefficients for local fractional differential equations. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 16, 140–146 (2016)
 7.
Sayevand, K.: A fresh view on numerical correction and optimization of Monte Carlo algorithm and its application for fractional differential equation. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 15(3), 209–215 (2015)
 8.
Albadarneha, R.B., Batihab, I.M., Zurigatb, M.: Numerical solutions for linear fractional differential equations of order \(1<\alpha< 2\) using finite difference method (ffdm). Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 16(1), 103–111 (2016)
 9.
Baleanu, D., Jajarmi, A., Bonyah, E., Hajipour, M.: New aspects of poor nutrition in the life cycle within the fractional calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018(1), 230 (2018)
 10.
Baleanu, D., Mousalou, A., Rezapour, S.: The extended fractional Caputo–Fabrizio derivative of order \(0\leq \sigma< 1\) on \(C_{R}[0, 1]\) and the existence of solutions for two higherorder seriestype differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018(1), 255 (2018)
 11.
Saqib, M., Khan, I., Shafie, S.: Application of Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative to mhd channel flow of cmcbasedcnt’s nanofluid through a porous medium. Chaos Solitons Fractals 116, 79–85 (2018)
 12.
Zafar, A.A., Fetecau, C.: Flow over an infinite plate of a viscous fluid with noninteger order derivative without singular kernel. Alex. Eng. J. 55(3), 2789–2796 (2016)
 13.
Makris, N., Dargush, G.F., Constantinou, M.C.: Dynamic analysis of generalized viscoelastic fluids. J. Eng. Mech. 119(8), 1663–1679 (1993)
 14.
Alkahtani, B.S.T., Atangana, A.: Modeling the potential energy field caused by mass density distribution with eton approach. Open Phys. 14(1), 106–113 (2016)
 15.
Vieru, D., Fetecau, C., Fetecau, C.: Timefractional free convection flow near a vertical plate with Newtonian heating and mass diffusion. Therm. Sci. 19(suppl. 1), 85–98 (2015)
 16.
Abro, K.A., Khan, I., GómezAguilar, J.F.: A mathematical analysis of a circular pipe in rate type fluid via Hankel transform. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133(10), 397 (2018)
 17.
Jain, S.: Numerical analysis for the fractional diffusion and fractional buckmaster equation by the twostep Laplace Adam–Bashforth method. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133(1), 19 (2018)
 18.
Agarwal, P., Dragomir, S.S., Jleli, M., Samet, B.: Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2018)
 19.
Ruzhansky, M., Cho, Y.J., Agarwal, P., Area, I.: Advances in Real and Complex Analysis with Applications. Springer, Berlin (2017)
 20.
Saad, K.M., Iyiola, O.S., Agarwal, P.: An effective homotopy analysis method to solve the cubic isothermal autocatalytic chemical system. AIMS Math. 3(1), 183–194 (2018)
 21.
Baltaeva, U., Agarwal, P.: Boundaryvalue problems for the thirdorder loaded equation with noncharacteristic typechange boundaries. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(9), 3307–3315 (2018)
 22.
Agarwal, P., ElSayed, A.A.: Nonstandard finite difference and Chebyshev collocation methods for solving fractional diffusion equation. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 500, 40–49 (2018)
 23.
Salahshour, S., Ahmadian, A., Senu, N., Baleanu, D., Agarwal, P.: On analytical solutions of the fractional differential equation with uncertainty: application to the Basset problem. Entropy 17(2), 885–902 (2015)
 24.
Agarwal, R.A., Jain, S., Agarwal, R.P., Baleanu, D.: A remark on the fractional integral operators and the image formulas of generalized Lommel–Wright function. Front. Phys. 6, 79 (2018)
 25.
Azhar, W.A., Vieru, D., Fetecau, C.: Free convection flow of some fractional nanofluids over a moving vertical plate with uniform heat flux and heat source. Phys. Fluids 29(8), 082001 (2017)
 26.
Jain, S., Atangana, A.: Analysis of lassa hemorrhagic fever model with nonlocal and nonsingular fractional derivatives. Int. J. Biomath. 11(08), 0850100 (2018)
 27.
Wang, X.Q., Mujumdar, A.S.: Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 46(1), 1–19 (2007)
 28.
Sheikholeslami, M., Shamlooei, M., Moradi, R.: Numerical simulation for heat transfer intensification of nanofluid in a porous curved enclosure considering shape effect of fe3o4 nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. Process. 124, 71–82 (2018)
 29.
Hussanan, A., Salleh, M.Z., Khan, I., Shafie, S.: Convection heat transfer in micropolar nanofluids with oxide nanoparticles in water, kerosene and engine oil. J. Mol. Liq. 229, 482–488 (2017)
 30.
Bhattad, A., Sarkar, J., Ghosh, P.: Discrete phase numerical model and experimental study of hybrid nanofluid heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 91, 262–273 (2018)
 31.
Hussain, S., Ahmed, S.E., Akbar, T.: Entropy generation analysis in mhd mixed convection of hybrid nanofluid in an open cavity with a horizontal channel containing an adiabatic obstacle. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 114, 1054–1066 (2017)
 32.
Farooq, U., Afridi, M., Qasim, M., Lu, D.: Transpiration and viscous dissipation effects on entropy generation in hybrid nanofluid flow over a nonlinear radially stretching disk. Entropy 20(9), 668 (2018)
 33.
Jan, S.A.A., Ali, F., Sheikh, N.A., Khan, I., Saqib, M., Gohar, M.: Engine oil based generalized Brinkmantype nanoliquid with molybdenum disulphide nanoparticles of spherical shape: Atangana–Baleanu fractional model. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 34(5), 1472–1488 (2018)
 34.
Aminossadati, S.M., Ghasemi, B.: Natural convection cooling of a localised heat source at the bottom of a nanofluidfilled enclosure. Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids 28(5), 630–640 (2009)
 35.
Brinkman, H.C.: The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 20(4), 571 (1952)
 36.
Bourantas, G.C., Loukopoulos, V.C.: Modeling the natural convective flow of micropolar nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 68, 35–41 (2014)
 37.
Maxwell, J.C.: Electricity and Magnetism, vol. 2. Dover, New York (1954)
 38.
Losada, J., Nieto, J.J.: Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 87–92 (2015)
 39.
Khan, I.: A note on exact solutions for the unsteady free convection flow of a Jeffrey fluid. Z. Naturforsch. A 70(6), 397–401 (2015)
 40.
Zakian, V., Littlewood, R.K.: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms by weighted leastsquares approximation. Comput. J. 16(1), 66–68 (1973)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) and Research Management CentreUTM, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia UTM, for the financial support through grant numbers 15H80 and 13H74 for this research.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this project.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
IK formulated the problem and drafted the manuscript. MS solved the problem and drafted the manuscript. SS performed the numerical simulation and plotted the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Ilyas Khan.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors do not have any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
MSC
 34A08
 76R10
Keywords
 Applications of fractional derivatives
 Heat transfer problem
 Modeling and simulation
 Hybrid nanofluid