 Research
 Open Access
Mittag–Leffler stability for a new coupled system of fractionalorder differential equations on network
 Yang Gao^{1}Email authorView ORCID ID profile
https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201815760
© The Author(s) 2018
 Received: 2 November 2017
 Accepted: 21 March 2018
 Published: 3 April 2018
Abstract
In this paper, the stability problem of a new coupled model constructed by two fractionalorder differential equations for every vertex is studied. The coupled relationship is hybrid. By using the method of constructing Lyapunov functions based on graphtheoretical approach for coupled systems, sufficient conditions that the coexistence equilibrium of the coupling model is globally Mittag–Leffler stable in \(R^{2n}\) are derived. An example is given to illustrate the main results.
Keywords
 Mittag–Leffler stable
 Coupled model
 Global stability
 Caputo derivative
1 Introduction
Furthermore, Li [8] investigated a coupled system of fractionalorder differential equations on network with feedback controls (CSFDENFCs). By using the contraction mapping principle, Lyapunov method, graph theoretic approach, and inequality techniques, some sufficient conditions were derived to ensure the existence, uniqueness, and global Mittag–Leffler stability of the equilibrium point of CSFDENFCs.
As far as we know, most of researchers are interested in CSNs constructed by only one fractionalorder differential equation for every vertex. To the best of author’s knowledge, there are less results about CSNs constructed by two or many fractionalorder differential equations for every vertex. In this paper, the coupled model (1) is generalized to the more complicated model. The vertex’s dynamical character is presented by the twodimensional system. The coupled relationship is constructed by two components of the vertex. The coupled system of fractional differential equations on network is studied. Sufficient conditions that the coexistence equilibrium of the coupling model is globally Mittag–Leffler stable in \(R^{2n}\) are derived by using the method of constructing Lyapunov functions based on graphtheoretical approach for coupled systems.
Remark 1.1
In fact, the generalization of model (1) is important and meaningful. Because a lot of ecological models can be seen as highdimensional coupled systems. Every node is constructed by two or many differential equations in integerorder systems. For example, predator–prey models with patches and dispersal are studied by a lot of researchers [1–6].
This paper is organized as follows. Preliminary results are introduced in Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, the main results are obtained. In the sequel, an example is presented in Sect. 4. Finally, the conclusions and outlooks are drawn in Sect. 5.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we list some definitions and theorems which will be used in the later sections.
A directed graph or digraph \(G=(V, E)\) contains a set \(V=\{1, 2, \ldots, n\}\) of vertices and a set E of arcs \((i, j)\) leading from initial vertex i to terminal vertex j. A subgraph H of G is said to be spanning if H and G have the same vertex set. A digraph G is weighted if each arc \((j, i)\) is assigned a positive weight. \(a_{ij}>0\) if and only if there exists an arc from vertex j to i in G.
The weight \(w(H)\) of a subgraph H is the product of the weights on all its arcs. A directed path P in G is a subgraph with distinct vertices \({i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{m}}\) such that its set of arcs is \(\{(i_{k}, i_{k+1}):k =1, 2, \ldots, m\}\). If \(i_{m}=i_{1}\), we call P a directed cycle.
A connected subgraph T is a tree if it contains no cycles, directed or undirected.
A tree T is rooted at vertex i, called the root if i is not a terminal vertex of any arcs, and each of the remaining vertices is a terminal vertex of exactly one arc. A subgraph Q is unicyclic if it is a disjoint union of rooted trees whose roots form a directed cycle.
Given a weighted digraph G with n vertices, the weight matrix \(A=(a_{ij})_{n\times n}\) can be defined by their entry \(a_{ij}\) equals the weight of arc \((j, i)\) if it exists, and 0 otherwise. We denote a weighted digraph as \((G, A)\). A digraph G is strongly connected if, for any pair of distinct vertices, there exists a directed path from one to the other. A weighted digraph \((G, A)\) is strongly connected if and only if the weight matrix A is irreducible.
The Laplacian matrix of \((G, A)\) is denoted by L. Let \(c_{i}\) denote the cofactor of the ith diagonal element of L. The following results are listed.
Lemma 2.1
([6])
Lemma 2.2
([6])
Definition 2.3
([9])
Definition 2.4
3 Main results
 \((H_{1})\) :

Functions \(f_{i}\), \(g_{i}\) are Lipschitzcontinuous on R with Lipschitz constant \(L^{x}_{i}>0, L ^{y}_{i}>0\), respectively, i.e.,for all \(u, v \in R\).$$\begin{aligned} & \bigl\vert f_{i}(u)f_{i}(v) \bigr\vert \leq L^{x}_{i}\vert uv \vert , \\ & \bigl\vert g_{i}(u)g_{i}(v) \bigr\vert \leq L^{y} _{i}\vert uv \vert \end{aligned}$$
 \((H_{2})\) :

There exists a constant λ such that$$ \lambda =\min \Biggl\{ 2 \Biggl(\alpha_{i}+\sum _{j=1}^{n}\beta^{x}_{ij}L^{x}_{i} \Biggr), 2 \Biggl( \beta_{i}+\sum_{j=1}^{n} \beta^{y}_{ij}L^{y}_{i} \Biggr)\Bigm i=1, 2, \ldots, n \Biggr\} >0. $$
A mathematical description of a network is a directed graph consisting of vertices and directed arcs connecting them. At each vertex, the local dynamics are given by a system of differential equations called the vertex system. The directed arcs indicate interconnections and interactions among vertex systems.
In this section, the coupled system of fractional differential equations on network is studied. By using the method of constructing Lyapunov functions based on graphtheoretical approach for coupled systems, sufficient conditions that the coexistence equilibrium of the coupling model (2) is globally Mittag–Leffler stable in \(R^{2n}\) are derived.
We obtain the main theorem as follows.
Theorem 3.1
 1.
Diagraph \((G, A)\) is balanced;
 2.
\(A^{x}=(\vert \beta^{x}_{ij} \vert )_{n\times n}, A^{y}=(\vert \beta^{y}_{ij} \vert )_{n\times n}\) are irreducible;
 3.
Conditions \((H_{1})\) and \((H_{2})\) hold;
 4.
The formula \(\beta^{x}_{ij}\theta^{1}_{j}=\beta ^{y}_{ij}\varepsilon^{1}_{j}\) holds for \(i, j=1, 2, \ldots, n\).
Proof
By Theorem 3.1, we obtain the following corollary naturally.
Corollary 3.2
4 An example
Model (5) can be regarded as the ecology model with two patches and dispersal. Some kind of rate of change for species can be denoted by fractional order differential for the species. This kind of rate of change of species \(x_{i}\) is related to \(y_{j}\) through the dispersal. Moreover, the rate of change of species \(y_{i}\) is related to \(x_{j}\) through the dispersal. The model with patches and dispersal is important in application [1–6]. In the sequel, model (5) is universal and useful in reality.
5 Conclusions and utlooks
In this paper, the new coupled model constructed by two fractionalorder differential equations for every vertex is studied. The coupled relationship is constructed by two components of the vertex. By using the method of constructing Lyapunov functions based on graphtheoretical approach for coupled systems, sufficient conditions that the coexistence equilibrium of the coupling model is globally Mittag–Leffler stable in \(R^{2n}\) are derived. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the main results.
Theorem 3.1 is the main result of this paper. This result is different from the previous studies. Firstly, Theorem 3.1 is a generalization of the main result of Li [7]. The model in this paper is more complicated for every vertex and the conditions of Theorem 3.1 are different from the result in Li [7]. Secondly, Theorem 3.1 is different from Shuai’s results [6] with the integer order differential. The fractional order differential is the main character for this paper. Moreover, the hybrid coupled relation is new and different from the previous papers [1–7]. There are also many difficulties in proving Theorem 3.1. One is the proof of \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_{i}a_{ij}[F^{x}_{ij}(t, x, y)+F^{y}_{ij}(t, x, y)]=0\); the other is the construction of the Lyapunov function for the coupled system.
Further studies on this subject are being carried out by the presenting author in the two aspects: one is to study the model with time delay; the other is to discuss the method to design control terms.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of HeiLongJiang Province (No. QC2009C99), Science and Technology Planning Project of Daqing City under Grant No. zd201749.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Freedman, H.I., Takeuchi, Y.: Global stability and predator dynamics in a model of prey dispersal in a patchy environment. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 13(8), 993–1002 (1989) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Kuang, Y., Takeuchi, Y.: Predator–prey dynamics in models of prey dispersal in 2patch environments. Math. Biosci. 120(1), 77–98 (1994) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Cui, J.G.: The effect of dispersal on permanence in a predator–prey population growth model. Comput. Math. Appl. 44(8–9), 1085–1097 (2002) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Xu, R., Chaplain, M.A.J., Davidson, F.A.: Periodic solutions for a delayed predator–prey model of prey dispersal in twopatch environments. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 5(1), 183–206 (2004) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Zhang, L., Teng, Z.D.: Permanence for a delayed periodic predator–prey model with prey dispersal in multipatches and predator densityindependent. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338(1), 175–193 (2008) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Li, M.Y., Shuai, Z.S.: Globalstability problem for coupled systems of differential equations on networks. J. Differ. Equ. 248(1), 1–20 (2010) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Li, H.L., Jiang, Y.Y., Wang, Z.L., Zhang, L., Teng, Z.D.: Global Mittag–Leffler stability of coupled system of fractionalorder differential equations on network. Appl. Math. Comput. 270, 269–277 (2015) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 Li, H.L., Hu, C., Jiang, Y.L., Zhang, L., Teng, Z.D.: Global Mittag–Leffler stability for a coupled system of fractionalorder differential equations on network with feedback controls. Neurocomputing 214, 233–241 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Li, Y., Chen, Y.Q., Podlubny, I.: Mittag–Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems. Automatica 45, 1965–1969 (2009) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar