Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

An anomalous diffusion model based on a new general fractional operator with the Mittag-Leffler function of Wiman type

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2, 3
Contributed equally
Advances in Difference Equations20182018:25

  • Received: 27 September 2017
  • Accepted: 7 January 2018
  • Published:


In this article, an anomalous diffusion model via a new Liouville-Caputo general fractional operator with the Mittag-Leffler function of Wiman type is investigated for the first time. The convergence of the series solution for the problem is discussed with the aid of the Laplace transform. The anomalous diffusion processes are compared to the characteristics of the conventional diffusion graphically. The results show that the new Liouville-Caputo general fractional operator is effective in characterizing and solving the problems of the anomalous diffusion.


  • anomalous diffusion
  • general fractional operator
  • analytic solution
  • Laplace transform

1 Introduction

In nature, the anomalous diffusion phenomena occur in multiple scientific fields including physical chemistry, bioscience and engineering technology [14]. When many researchers attempt to describe or characterize these phenomena by the conventional integer-order differential equations, the theoretical analyses are not in good agreement with the real observations [4]. With the development of fractional calculus theory (FCT), the scientists discovered that the fractional differential equations (FDEs) have great advantages in solving many anomalous physical phenomena [58]. Kumar et al. [9] proposed a time-fractional modified Kawahara equation based on the Caputo-Fabrizio operator and discussed a fractional model of convective radial fins with the aid of the Homotopy analysis transform method numerically [10]. Singh et al. [11] analyzed the El Nino-Southern Oscillation model via the iterative method and fixed point theorem, as well as a nonlinear fractional dynamical model of interpersonal and romantic relationships through the q-homotopy analysis Sumudu transform method [12]. Especially, the anomalous behaviors involving the diffusion problem, heat transfer, creep phenomena, fluid flow process, oscillating circuits and the convection dispersion have been the research hot spots (see [1318]). For instance, Metzler and Klafter presented the kinetic diffusion equations based on the fractional derivative (FD) in [19]. Yang et al. proposed the rheological models with the aid of FD in [20]. Ren et al. solved the time-fractional convection dispersion equations in [21]. However, the methods for obtaining the analytic solutions of those FDEs are still lacking due to the complexity of FCT (see [22, 23]).

The Mittag-Leffler function (MLF) and its extended forms, which are closely related to the FCT, seem to provide us with new ideas in describing some anomalous phenomena and solving the FDEs [24, 25]. Based on the MLFs, many fractional differential operators (FDOs) have been suggested (see [18, 2531]). For example, Caputo and Fabrizio [30] defined a new fractional derivative without singular kernel. Atangana et al. used the MLF to replace the exponent function in the integral kernel of the above definition and obtained its new form in [18]. Giusti et al. suggested the Prabhakar-like fractional derivative in [31]. A family of general FDOs based on the extensions of the classical MLFs (Gösta Mittag-Leffler, Wiman and Prabhakar functions) were proposed in [25, 28]. In fact, there are close relationships among these FDOs. As analyzed in [9] by Kumar, the Caputo-Fabrizio operator is much more efficient than the classical Caputo derivative. For Atangana’s suggestion to the new fractional derivative with one-parameter MLF, it is an extended version of the Caputo-Fabrizio operator [18]. Similarly, the Prabhakar-like fractional derivative can return to the Caputo-Fabrizio operator and the new FDOs defined by Yang when the parameters take the particular values (see [25, 28, 31]). These FDOs involving the MLFs in the integral kernel have been applied to model many physical phenomena, such as the anomalous relaxation, heat-transfer problems, viscoelastic problems, Euler-Lagrange equation and the boundary value problem, extensively (see [18, 2836]). Especially, the new general FDOs with the aid of Laplace transform (LT) of the MLFs may be provided to describe different anomalous physical phenomena (see [28]). Inspired by this, this paper aims to model the anomalous diffusion problems by the new general FDOs and to obtain the analytic solution.

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, the definitions of several MLFs, the new Liouville-Caputo general FDO with the extension of Wiman function, as well as the LT of the Wiman and Prabhakar MLFs with power-law functions, are reviewed. In Section 3, an anomalous diffusion model (ADM) based on the above general FDO is proposed, and its analytic solution is also given. In addition, the ADMs with different parameters are analyzed graphically. Finally, the conclusions are summarized in Section 4.

2 The MLF and a new general FDO

2.1 The MLF and LTs of its generations

In recent decades, owing to the successful applications of MLFs in multiple fields involving applied sciences and pure mathematics, they have received wide attention. Correspondingly, a variety of the extensions or generalizations of the MLF have been suggested. Here, we review them as follows.

Let \(\mathbb{C}\), \(\mathbb{ R}\) and \(\mathbb{N}\) be the sets of complex numbers, real numbers and positive integers, respectively.

Definition 1

The MLF proposed by Gösta Magnus Mittag-Leffler in 1903 [24, 26, 28] is given by
$$ E_{\vartheta}( \chi )=\sum_{\lambda =0}^{\infty}{\frac{\chi ^{\lambda}}{\Gamma ( {\vartheta \lambda +1} )}} , $$
where ϑ, \(\chi \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\operatorname{Re} \vartheta >0\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{ N}\), and \(\Gamma ( \cdot )\) denotes the Gamma function.

Definition 2

The first extended form to the MLF, suggested by Wiman in 1905 [24, 28], is defined as
$$ E_{\vartheta ,\varpi } ( \chi )=\sum_{\lambda =0}^{\infty}{\frac{\chi ^{\lambda}}{\Gamma ( {\vartheta \lambda +\varpi } )}} , $$
where ϑ, ϖ, \(\chi \in \mathbb{C}\), \(\operatorname{Re}\vartheta >0\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb{ N}\).

Definition 3

The extension of the MLF containing three parameters, proposed by Prabhakar in 1971 [24, 27, 28], is described as
$$ E_{\vartheta ,\varpi }^{\tau}( \chi )=\sum _{\lambda =0}^{\infty}{\frac{ ( \tau )_{\lambda}}{\Gamma ( {\lambda +1} )\Gamma ( {\vartheta \lambda +\varpi } )}\chi ^{\lambda}} , $$
where ϑ, ϖ, χ, \(\tau \in \mathbb{C}\), Reϑ, \(\tau >0\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb{ N}\), and the Pochhammer symbol is
$$ ( \tau )_{\lambda}=\tau ( {\tau +1} )\cdots(\tau +\lambda -1)=\textstyle\begin{cases} 1,&\lambda \mbox{=}0, \\ \frac{\Gamma ( {\tau +\lambda } )}{\Gamma ( \tau )},&\lambda \ge 1. \end{cases} $$

Definition 4

The new extended forms to the MLFs of Wiman and Prabhakar types are defined as follows [28]:
$$ E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta } ( \chi )=\sum_{\lambda =0}^{\infty}{\frac{\chi ^{\lambda}}{\Gamma ( {\vartheta \lambda +\varpi +\theta } )}} $$
$$ E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta }^{\tau}( \chi )=\sum _{\lambda =0}^{\infty}{\frac{ ( \tau )_{\lambda}}{\Gamma ( {\lambda +1} )\Gamma ( {\vartheta \lambda +\varpi +\theta } )}\chi ^{\lambda}} , $$
where ϑ, ϖ, χ, \(\tau \in \mathbb{C}\), Reϑ, \(\tau >0\) and \(\lambda \in \mathbb{ N}\).

Definition 5

The LT of a real function \(\phi ( x )\), \(x>0\), is defined as [37, 38]
$$ F ( \xi )=L \bigl[ {\phi ( x )} \bigr]= \int_{0}^{\infty}{\phi ( x )e^{-\xi x}\,dx} ,\quad \xi >0, $$
where L is the LT operator.
According to the literature [28], the LTs of the new extensions of Wiman and Prabhakar functions with power-law functions are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

The LT of the new extensions of Wiman and Prabhakar functions with the power-law functions [ 28 ]

The Wiman and Prabhakar functions with the power-law functions


\(\chi ^{\varpi +\theta -1}E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta } ( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} )\)

\(\xi ^{- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-1}\)

\(\chi ^{\varpi +\theta -1}E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta }^{\tau}( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} )\)

\(\xi ^{- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-\tau }\)

2.2 The new Liouville-Caputo general FDO with the extension of Wiman function

Definition 6

Let \(0<\vartheta <1\) and ϑ, ϖ, \(\theta \in \mathbb{ R}\). The new Liouville-Caputo general FDO with the extension of Wiman function is defined as [28]
$$ \bigl( {{ }_{0}^{LC} {\mathrm{D}}_{\chi}^{ ( \vartheta )} \Omega } \bigr) ( \chi )= \int_{0}^{\gamma}{ \bigl[ { ( {\gamma -\chi } )^{\varpi +\theta -1}E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta } \bigl( { ( {\gamma -\chi } )^{\vartheta}} \bigr)} \bigr]\Omega ^{ ( 1 )} ( \chi )\,d\chi }, $$
$$\Omega ^{ ( 1 )} ( \chi )=\frac{d\Omega ( \chi )}{d\chi}. $$
The LT of Eq. (8) is given as follows [28, 38, 39]:
$$ F ( \xi )=\xi ^{- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-1}\times \bigl[ {\xi L \bigl[ {\Omega ( \chi )} \bigr]-\Omega ( 0 )} \bigr]. $$


According to the literature [31], there is
$$\lim_{\eta \to 0} \chi^{\varpi +\theta -1}E_{\vartheta ,\varpi+\theta } \bigl({\eta} { \chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr)=\frac{\chi^{\varpi +\theta -1}}{\Gamma ( {\varpi+\theta } )}, $$
which is the integral kernel of the Liouville-Caputo FDO. It indicates that the Liouville-Caputo fractional derivative is a special case of the general Liouville-Caputo fractional-order derivative of Wiman type.

3 Analyses of the ADM

3.1 Analytic solution of the ADM

Applying the new Liouville-Caputo general FDO with the extension of Wiman function equation (8), we can obtain a new anomalous diffusion model as follows:
$$ \bigl( {{ }_{0}^{LC} {\mathrm{D}}_{\chi}^{ ( \vartheta )} u} \bigr) ( {x,\chi } )=\varepsilon \frac{\partial ^{2}u ( {x,\chi } )}{\partial x^{2}},\quad x, \chi >0, $$
where ε is a real constant reflecting the magnitudes of the diffusion capacity.
The initial value condition of the above anomalous diffusion equation is
$$ u ( {x,0} )=0, $$
and the boundary value conditions are
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u ( {0,\chi } )=c, \\ u ( {\infty ,\chi } )=B, \end{cases} $$
where c is a real constant and B is a bounded real number.
From Eqs. (8) and (9), performing LT of Eq. (10) with respect to γ, we can obtain
$$ \xi ^{- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-1}\times \bigl[ {\xi U(x,\xi )-u ( {x,0} )} \bigr]=\varepsilon U^{ ( 2 )}(x,\xi ). $$
Meanwhile, the corresponding boundary value conditions via LT become
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} U(0,\xi )=\frac{c}{\xi }, \\ U ( {\infty ,\xi } )=B. \end{cases} $$
Substituting Eq. (11) into Eq. (13), we have
$$ MU(x,\xi )=\varepsilon U^{ ( 2 )}(x,\xi ), $$
$$ M=\xi ^{1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-1}. $$
Then, applying the eigenvalue method [40], we can obtain the analytic solution of Eq. (15) as follows:
$$ U(x,\xi )=C_{1} e^{\sqrt {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} x}+C_{2} e^{-\sqrt {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} x}. $$
Next, the substitution of Eq. (14) into Eq. (17) results in
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} C_{1} +C_{2} =\frac{c}{\xi }, \\ C_{1} =0. \end{cases} $$
Finally, substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (17), we obtain
$$ U(x,\xi )=\frac{c}{\xi }e^{-\sqrt {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} x}. $$
To obtain the series solution of Eq. (8), consider the following Taylor series [41]:
$$ e^{-\sqrt {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} x}=1- \biggl( {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{1 / 2}x+\frac{1}{2}\frac{M}{\varepsilon }x^{2}- \frac{1}{6} \biggl( {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{3 / 2}x^{3}+ \frac{1}{24} \biggl( {\frac{M}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{2}x^{4}+ \cdots. $$
Substituting Eqs. (16) and (20) into Eq. (19), we have
$$\begin{aligned} U(x,\xi ) =&\frac{c}{\xi }-\frac{c}{\xi } \biggl( { \frac{\xi ^{1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-1}}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{1 / 2}x+\frac{c}{2\xi } \frac{\xi ^{1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-1}}{\varepsilon }x^{2} \\ &{}-\frac{c}{6\xi } \biggl( {\frac{\xi ^{1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-1}}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{3 / 2}x^{3}+ \frac{c}{24\xi } \biggl( {\frac{\xi ^{1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} ( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} )^{-1}}{\varepsilon }} \biggr)^{2}x^{4} +\cdots \\ =&\frac{c}{\xi }-\frac{c}{\sqrt {\varepsilon}}\xi ^{{ ( {-1- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} )} / 2} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-1 / 2}x \\ &{} +\frac{c}{2\varepsilon }\xi ^{- ( {\varpi +\theta } )} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-1}x^{2} \\ &{} -\frac{c}{6\varepsilon ^{3 / 2}}\xi ^{{ ( {1-3 ( {\varpi +\theta } )} )} / 2} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-3/2}x^{3} \\ &{} +\frac{c}{24\varepsilon ^{2}}\xi ^{1-2 ( {\varpi +\theta } )} \bigl( {1-\xi ^{-\vartheta }} \bigr)^{-2}x^{4}+\cdots. \end{aligned}$$
Finally, using Table 1, we can easily obtain
$$\begin{aligned} u(x,\chi ) =&c-\frac{c}{\sqrt {\varepsilon}}x\chi ^{{ ( {\varpi +\theta -1} )} / 2}E_{\vartheta ,{ ( {1+ ( {\varpi +\theta } )} )} / 2}^{1 / 2} \bigl( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr) \\ &{} +\frac{c}{2\varepsilon }x^{2}\chi ^{\varpi +\theta -1}E_{\vartheta ,\varpi +\theta } \bigl( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr) \\ &{}-\frac{c}{6\varepsilon ^{3 / 2}}x^{3}\chi ^{{3 ( {\varpi +\theta -1} )} / 2}E_{\vartheta ,{ ( {3 ( {\varpi +\theta } )-1} )} / 2}^{3 / 2} \bigl( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr) \\ &{} +\frac{c}{24\varepsilon ^{2}}x^{4}\chi ^{2 ( {\varpi +\theta -1} )}E_{\vartheta ,2 ( {\varpi +\theta } )-1}^{2} \bigl( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr)+\cdots \\ =&c+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{ \biggl[ { \frac{c ( {-x} )^{n}}{n!\varepsilon ^{n / 2}}\chi ^{{n ( {\varpi +\theta -1} )} / 2}E_{\vartheta ,{n ( {\varpi +\theta -1} )} / 2+1}^{n / 2} \bigl( {\chi ^{\vartheta}} \bigr)} \biggr]} . \end{aligned}$$

3.2 Numerical analyses of the ADM

In this subsection, we illustrate the numerical analyses of the ADM from multiple angles. Firstly, we analyze the convergence of Eq. (22) by discussing the values of n. Secondly, the comparisons between the conventional diffusion and the anomalous diffusion are presented graphically. Next, the characteristics of the anomalous diffusion with the varied fractional orders are represented. Finally, the ADMs with several varied parameters are shown graphically.

The applications of the series solution with the complete terms are not conducive to solving the practical problems. In fact, the series solution may converge to its finite terms. For Eq. (22) with \(\vartheta =0.2\), we compare its results graphically when n takes 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, when n tends to 4, the solution of Eq. (22) is almost consistent with the result with \(n=3\), which indicates that Eq. (22) when \(n=4\) can be treated as the convergence solution. Similarly, when ϑ takes 0.4 and 0.6, Eq. (22) also converges to the result with \(n=4\) (see Figure 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Numerical solution of the anomalous diffusion equation ( 22 ) as a function of time χ and space x for \(\pmb{c=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\varepsilon =0.8}\) , \(\pmb{\varpi =0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\theta =0.3}\) , \(\pmb{\vartheta =0.2}\) , \(\pmb{n=4}\) .

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Numerical solution of the anomalous diffusion equation ( 22 ) as a function of time χ and space x for \(\pmb{c=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\varepsilon =0.8}\) , \(\pmb{\varpi =0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\theta =0.3}\) , \(\pmb{\vartheta =0.4}\) , \(\pmb{n=1,2,3,4}\) , (b) numerical solution of the anomalous diffusion equation ( 22 ) as a function of time χ and space x for \(\pmb{c=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\varepsilon =0.8}\) , \(\pmb{\varpi =0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\theta =0.3}\) , \(\pmb{\vartheta =0.6}\) , \(\pmb{n=1,2,3,4}\) .

In order to illustrate the differences between the conventional diffusion and the anomalous diffusion, we give the exact solution of the conventional diffusion model as follows [39]:
$$ u ( {x,\chi } )=c\times \mathit{erfc} \biggl( {\frac{x}{2\sqrt {\varepsilon \chi } }} \biggr). $$
Eq. (23) is compared to the results of Eq. (22) with \(\vartheta =0.2\) and 0.4 graphically. As shown in Figure 3, the anomalous diffusion processes present different characteristics from the conventional diffusion. The gradient of anomalous diffusion is smaller than that of the conventional diffusion.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Comparisons between conventional diffusion with \(\pmb{c=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\varepsilon =0.8}\) and anomalous diffusion with \(\pmb{c=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\varepsilon =0.8}\) , \(\pmb{\varpi =0.5}\) , \(\pmb{\theta =0.3}\) , \(\pmb{\vartheta =0.2, 0.4}\) , \(\pmb{n=4}\) .

Figure 4 shows the effects of different orders on the anomalous diffusion processes. Clearly, the smaller the orders are, the stronger the diffusion processes are. Under the same conditions, the diffusion concentrations approximately range from 0.45 to 0.4 for \(\vartheta =0.2\), 0.46 to 0.425 for \(\vartheta =0.4\), 0.47 to 0.44 for \(\vartheta =0.6\) and 0.475 to 0.45 for \(\vartheta =0.8\), respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Comparisons of anomalous diffusion processes with different fractional orders.

Considering the effect of different parameters on the anomalous diffusion processes, we present the diffusion processes with several varied parameters in Figure 5. The values of different parameters are listed in Table 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Numerical solutions of the anomalous diffusion equation ( 22 ) as a function of time χ and space x with different parameters shown in Table  2 .

Table 2

Different parameters for the anomalous diffusion model

Figure numbers








Figure 5(a)



0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8




Figure 5(b)



0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8




Figure 5(c)



0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8




Figure 5(d)



0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8




4 Conclusions

In the current paper, we have solved a new ADM based on a new Liouville-Caputo general FDO with the extension of Wiman function. The analytic series solution was obtained and its convergence was discussed. The results show that the numerical solutions can satisfy the accuracy when \(n=4\), and the new FDO is effective in describing the anomalous diffusion phenomena. In addition, the anomalous diffusion processes exhibit different characteristics from the conventional diffusion, and they are greatly affected by the varied parameters. Specially, the smaller the orders are, the stronger the diffusion processes are.




This research was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017BSCXA21) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX17_1531).

Authors’ contributions

All authors drafted the manuscript, and they read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China


  1. Uchaikin, VV: Cosmic ray anisotropy in fractional differential models of anomalous diffusion. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 116(6), 897-903 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sergis, A, Hardalupas, Y: Anomalous heat transfer modes of nanofluids: a review based on statistical analysis. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6(1), 1-37 (2011) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Marco, D, Philippe, G: Self-averaging and weak ergodicity breaking of diffusion in heterogeneous media. Phys. Rev. E 96(2), Article ID 022156 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Copot, D, Magin, RL, Keyser, RD, Ionescu, C: Data-driven modelling of drug tissue trapping using anomalous kinetics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 102, 441-446 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y, Gao, Q, Wei, Y, Wang, Y: Study on fractional order gradient methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 314, 310-321 (2017) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Ionescu, C, Lopes, A, Copot, D, Machado, JAT, Bates, JHT: The role of fractional calculus in modelling biological phenomena: a review. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 51, 141-159 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang, XJ, Baleanu, D, Gao, F: New analytical solutions for Klein-Gordon and Helmholtz equations in fractal dimensional space. Proc. Rom. Acad., Ser. A: Math. Phys. Tech. Sci. Inf. Sci. 18(3), 231-238 (2017) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang, XJ: New general fractional-order rheological models with kernels of Mittag-Leffler functions. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69(4), 118 (2017) Google Scholar
  9. Kumar, D, Singh, J, Baleanu, D: Modified Kawahara equation within a fractional derivative with non-singular kernel. Therm. Sci. (2017). Google Scholar
  10. Kumar, D, Singh, J, Baleanu, D: A fractional model of convective radial fins with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69(1), 103 (2017) Google Scholar
  11. Singh, J, Kumar, D, Nieto, JJ: Analysis of an El Nino-Southern Oscillation model with a new fractional derivative. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 99, 109-115 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh, J, Kumar, D, Qurashi, MA, Baleanu, D: A novel numerical approach for a nonlinear fractional dynamical model of interpersonal and romantic relationships. Entropy 19(7), 375 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang, XJ, Machado, JAT: A new fractional operator of variable order: application in the description of anomalous diffusion. Physica, A 481, 276-283 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ding, X, Zhang, GQ, Zhao, B, Wang, Y: Unexpected viscoelastic deformation of tight sandstone: Insights and predictions from the fractional Maxwell model. Scientific Reports 7, (2017) Google Scholar
  15. Sun, HG, Liu, X, Zhang, Y, Pang, G, Garrard, R: A fast semi-discrete Kansa method to solve the two-dimensional spatiotemporal fractional diffusion. J. Comput. Phys. 345, 74-90 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrera, Y, Rosa, ADL, Vernon-Carter, EJ, Alvarez-Ramirez, J: A fractional-order Maxwell model for non-Newtonian fluids. Physica, A 482, 276-285 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar, D, Agarwal, RP, Singh, J: A modified numerical scheme and convergence analysis for fractional model of Lienard’s equation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (2017)
  18. Atangana, A, Baleanu, D: New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 20(2), 763-769 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Metzler, R, Klafter, J: The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 339(1), 1-77 (2000) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang, XJ, Feng, G, Srivastava, HM: New rheological models within local fractional derivative. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69(3), Article ID 113 (2017) Google Scholar
  21. Ren, L, Wang, YM: A fourth-order extrapolated compact difference method for time-fractional convection-reaction-diffusion equations with spatially variable coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 312, 1-22 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ahmadian, A, Ismail, F, Salahshour, S, Baleanu, D, Ghaemi, F: Uncertain viscoelastic models with fractional order: a new spectral tau method to study the numerical simulations of the solution. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 53, 44-64 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mokhtary, P: Numerical analysis of an operational Jacobi Tau method for fractional weakly singular integro-differential equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 121, 52-67 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorenflo, R, Kilbas, AA, Mainardi, F, Rogosin, SV: Mittag-Leffler Functions, Related Topics and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2014) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang, XJ, Tenreiro Machado, JA, Baleanu, D: Anomalous diffusion models with general fractional derivatives within the kernels of the extended Mittag-Leffler type functions. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69, Article ID 115 (2017) Google Scholar
  26. Srivastava, HM, Živorad, T: Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag–Leffler function in the kernel. Appl. Math. Comput. 211(1), 198-210 (2009) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Saigo, M, Saxena, RK, Kilbas, AA: Generalized Mittag-Leffler function and generalized fractional calculus operators. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 15(1), 31-49 (2004) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang, XJ: General fractional calculus operators containing the generalized Mittag-Leffler functions applied to anomalous relaxation. Therm. Sci. 21(1), S317-S326 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gao, F: General fractional calculus in nonsingular power-law kernel applied to model anomalous diffusion phenomena in heat-transfer problems. Therm. Sci. 21(1), S11-S18 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Caputo, M, Fabrizio, M: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1, 73-85 (2015) Google Scholar
  31. Giusti, A, Colombaro, I: Prabhakar-like fractional viscoelasticity. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 56, 138-143 (2018) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao, F, Yang, XJ, Mohyud-Din, ST: On linear viscoelasticity within general fractional derivatives without singular kernel. Therm. Sci. 21(1), S335-S342 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang, XJ, Srivastava, HM, Delfim, FM, Torres, AD: General fractional-order anomalous diffusion with nonsingular power-law kernel. Therm. Sci. 21(1), S1-S9 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Escamilla, AC, Aguilar, JFG, Baleanu, D, Escobar-Jimenez, RF, Olivares-Peregrino, VH, Abundez-Pliego, A: Formulation of Euler-Lagrange and Hamilton equations involving fractional operators with regular kernel. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 283 (2016) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Abdeljawad, T, Baleanu, D: Integration by parts and its applications of a new nonlocal fractional derivative with Mittag-Leffler nonsingular kernel. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10(3), 1098-1107 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Baleanu, D, Jajarmi, A, Hajipour, M: A new formulation of the fractional optimal control problems involving Mittag-Leffler nonsingular kernel. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 175(3), 718-737 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Doetsch, G, Debnath, L: Introduction to the Theory and Application of the Laplace Transformation. Springer, Berlin (1974) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Debnath, L: Review of “Introduction to the theory and application of the Laplace transformation” by Gustav Doetsch. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 539-553 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Liang, X, Gao, F, Gao, YN, Yang, XJ: Applications of a novel integral transform to partial differential equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10, 528-534 (2017) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Polyanin, AD, Zaitsev, VF: Exact Solutions for Ordinary Differential Equations. CRC Press, New York (1995) MATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Möller, T, Machiraju, R, Mueller, K, Yagel, R: Evaluation and design of filters using a Taylor series expansion. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 3(2), 184-199 (1997) View ArticleGoogle Scholar