- Research
- Open Access
Solution of two-dimensional time-fractional Burgers equation with high and low Reynolds numbers
- Wen Cao^{1},
- Qinwu Xu^{2}Email author and
- Zhoushun Zheng^{1}
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1398-5
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 18 June 2017
Accepted: 10 October 2017
Published: 23 October 2017
Abstract
Burgers’ equation frequently appears in the study of turbulence theory, as well as some other scientific fields. High and low Reynolds numbers play important roles in both modeling and numerical simulation. In this paper, we apply a numerical scheme to solve a two-dimensional time-fractional Burgers equation. The key feature of the proposed method is formed by combining the discontinuous Galerkin method to spatial variables and a finite difference scheme to temporal variables. The corresponding numerical analysis is also presented. Several numerical tests are carried out to demonstrate the theoretical analysis and we present a shock wave phenomenon of the new Burgers model.
Keywords
MSC
1 Introduction
Fractional calculus is not a new subject. It first appeared in the discussion by mathematicians Leibniz and l’Hospital. However, its theoretical growth took up several hundreds years before people found that it might have very important potential applications [10]. In many scientific and engineering fields, such as theoretical physical problems [11], diffusion processes [12], vibration and control [13], oscillating dynamical systems [14], thermal conductivity [15], rheological models [16], quantum models [17], etc., fractional derivative models manifest much better and describe real-world data more accurate than integer-order models do. Fractional derivative models not only preserve the basic features of considered problems, but also give more parameters to predict other inner properties of the model, especially for the problems involving spatial dependence and temporal memory [18]. For instance, based on the previous research on diffusion models, it is found that the temporal fractional derivative with order one is considered to be a critical value. Then those models with orders of temporal fractional derivative of less than one directly lead to subdiffusion processes, while the models containing orders greater than one indicate the superdiffusion processes. Therefore, fractional derivative models provide an effective way to model anomalous diffusion problems.
Nowadays, fractional calculus modeling methods are considered as powerful techniques to handle physical and engineering problems with memory feature and nonlocal property, due to the natural structure of fractional integrals and derivatives making them a global and weak singular integration [10]. Nevertheless, the study of Burgers’ equation is fruitful and the literature on these models with fractional derivatives is still scarce. Especially for the multiple-dimensional fractional Burgers model, there are many concrete problems that need to be solved. Therefore, it shall be meaningful to further examine Burgers models with various fractional derivatives. Since the 1990s, numerical methods for fractional differential equations have undergone considerable development, due to the reason that more and more classic models are reconsidered by using a fractional calculus framework. Thus, in this paper, we shall consider a class of two-dimensional time-fractional Burgers equations over bounded domain with high and low Reynolds numbers, and further study the dynamic behaviors through numerical simulations.
Numerical methods applied to a fractional Burgers equation include the finite difference method, the integral transform method, the variational method, and some others. As mentioned, some of them become easier under a Cole-Hopf transform; i.e., see [19]. For instance, in [20] a fractional Burgers equation with half-order damping term is considered. It is verified that if the coefficient of the half-order derivative is also small, as is usually the case, the evolution comprises three stages, namely a lossless near field, an intermediate Burgers region, and a hereditary far field. In [21], the series expansion method is applied to a local fractional derivative to obtain the solutions of both homogeneous and nonhomogeneous transport equations. The finite difference and spectral methods are applied to numerical simulations. In [22], the Adomian decomposition method is applied to solve the fractional KdV-Burgers equation. The decomposition methods are powerful to provide a series expansion which eventually converges to the true solution. In [23], the Adomian decomposition method is applied to study a class of coupled Burgers equations with Caputo derivatives equipped on both temporal and spatial variables. The obtained numerical solutions are of a form of rapidly convergent series and easily computable components. In [24], a nonlinear fractional Burgers problem is approximated by finite volume schemes of order one in space and, also, in time. It is proved that the finite volume solution converges to a weak entropic solution as the step size vanishes finally. In [25, 26] new spectral methods are proposed for fractional differential equations and high efficiency property of the methods is demonstrated through numerical examples. More numerical studies on time- and/or space-fractional Burgers equations can be found in [27–33]. Recently, one interesting branch of numerical study of fractional Burgers equations has emerged: the implementation of the discontinuous Galerkin method (DGM) [34–40]. The DGM has several advantages to reach this goal: (1) it behaves well if the solution of Burgers’ equation is regular enough under certain initial and parameter settings; (2) when a shock wave solution appears, the DGM can handle high-effective numerical approximations near discontinuities [41]. Unfortunately, the results for the DGM in fractional Burgers equations, as well as many nonlinear fractional integrable systems, are not fruitful. This became the major motivation to carry out the current work.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly introduce fractional integrals and derivatives to make this article self-contained. In Section 3, we propose a two-dimensional time-fractional Burgers equation and present a hybrid numerical scheme based on the DGM and the finite difference scheme. In Section 4, two numerical examples are given and numerical simulations are carried out and discussed. Finally, conclusions are drawn and some future plans are suggested in Section 5.
2 Preliminaries
We briefly recall some definitions and properties of fractional integrals and derivatives. More details of them can be found in popular monographs [10]. Let \(\Gamma(\cdot)\) be the gamma function and let \(\alpha>0\) be a real number. By extending the usual multi-fold integration of integer-order, it is natural to have the following fractional integral operator.
Definition 1
(see [10])
Borrowing the fact that differentiation and integration operations are mutually inverse in general, there are two basic ways to define fractional derivatives, which are, respectively, called the Riemann-Liouville sense and the Caputo sense.
Definition 2
(see [10])
Definition 3
(see [10])
In most of the literature, it is verified that models with Riemann-Liouville derivative need some nonlocal initial condition to guarantee the existence and regularity of solution. However, models with Caputo derivative can inherit the conventional initial and boundary conditions of corresponding integer-order models. Therefore, we give the partial fractional derivative of a function \(u(x,y,t)\) in the Caputo sense below.
Definition 4
(see [10])
3 Model and numerical method
3.1 Conservation of solution
Now we start our discussion by recalling the fact that solving (6) with a closed form solution is impossible, thus we shall adopt some useful way to find the evidence that a solution with certain regularity exists. The fundamental skill is borrowed from the projection method. Let \(\phi(x,y)\in\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_{0}(\Omega)\), where \(\mathcal{C}^{\infty}_{0}(\Omega)\) denotes the set of all sufficiently smooth functions with compact support defined in Ω.
Equations (15)-(16) show the dissipative property of the viscous term. It is also called dissipative term, which makes the solution approach 0. The dissipation strength is determined by the Reynolds number \(\operatorname{Re}=\frac{1}{\nu}\). For \(\operatorname{Re}\gg1\), the equation approximates a pure wave equation and the energy is almost conserved. While \(\operatorname{Re}\sim1\), the dissipative term will be the leading part. The velocity of flow shall decay due to the impact of the viscous force. The flow field becomes stable eventually.
By the property of Caputo derivative, the time-fractional Burgers equation keeps the conservation or dissipation property of the classical Burgers equation.
3.2 Discontinuous Galerkin method
In this part, we propose a numerical scheme based on the full discretization which is of finite differences for temporal variables and the DGM for spatial variables. The basic advantage of the DGM is that the shock wave solution of Burgers’ equation can be better approximated.
3.2.1 Semi-discretization scheme
3.2.2 Time integration
Compared with the classical Burgers equation, a proper discretization scheme for time-fractional derivatives is important. In references, several different approximation schemes are proposed, such as the Grünwald-Letnikov scheme, \(L_{1}\) approximation. The local DGM is often combined with the explicit time integration scheme, s.t. the Euler method and the Runge-Kutta method, to take its full advantages. Especially for nonlinear problems, the implicit time integration scheme will bring about great computational cost due to large degrees of freedom of the local DGM and the need to solve nonlinear equations.
We introduce the following lemma.
Lemma 1
(see [42])
4 Numerical simulation and discussion
Example 1
Error and order of convergence of time discretization for example 1 ( \(\pmb{h=0.3}\) , polynomial degree \(\pmb{N=4}\) )
Δ t | α = 0.7 | α = 0.8 | α = 0.9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\boldsymbol { \Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | \(\boldsymbol {\Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | \(\boldsymbol {\Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | |
1.0e–4 | 1.46e–04 | - | 1.46e–04 | - | 1.48e–04 | - |
5.0e–5 | 7.83e–05 | 0.90 | 7.76e–05 | 0.91 | 7.79e–05 | 0.92 |
2.5e–5 | 4.28e–05 | 0.87 | 4.23e–05 | 0.88 | 3.97e–05 | 0.97 |
Error and order of convergence of spatial discretization for example 1
h | α = 0.7 | α = 0.8 | α = 0.9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\boldsymbol {\Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | \(\boldsymbol {\Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | \(\boldsymbol { \Vert e_{u} \Vert _{2}}\) | Order | |
N = 1 | ||||||
0.4 | 4.43e–02 | 4.29e–02 | 4.1e–2 | - | ||
0.2 | 9.89e–03 | 2.16 | 9.80e–03 | 2.13 | 9.8e–3 | 2.06 |
0.1 | 2.37e–03 | 2.06 | 2.35e–03 | 2.06 | 2.3e–3 | 2.09 |
N = 2 | ||||||
0.8 | 7.78e–02 | 7.08e–02 | 6.45e–02 | |||
0.4 | 1.19e–02 | 2.71 | 1.13e–02 | 2.65 | 1.07e–02 | 2.59 |
0.2 | 1.39e–03 | 3.10 | 1.40e–03 | 3.01 | 1.30e–03 | 3.04 |
Example 2
From Figures 1-3, the following observations can be obtained:
(1) We select three different values of ν, which, respectively, correspond to high, moderate, and low Reynolds numbers. One can easily see that model (6) reveals a convection-dominant phenomenon with a high Reynolds number, while it shows dispersion-dominant characteristics with a low Reynolds number. This is expected by comparing with the classic Burgers equation. The fractional Burgers equation indeed preserves the fundamental property of integer-order Burgers equations.
(2) When high Reynolds numbers are considered, we solve model (6) with different orders of fractional derivatives and illustrate numerical solutions at moments \(t=0.2\) and \(t=0.8\). As we can observe from Figure 1, the peak of the solution moves to the boundary rapidly and crushes at the wavefront, which is called the shock wave phenomenon in the nonlinear partial differential equation theory. Therefore, the fractional Burgers equation also can display a shock wave solution which is not globally continuously differentiable as that of the classic Burgers equation, under certain selections of parameters in the equation.
(5) Now we make a systematic comparison on the above three plots. No matter how high or low the Reynolds number is, when the Reynolds number is fixed, model (6) diffuses relatively fast under small α and correspondingly slow under large α. This agrees with the fractional Fick law: a large order of fractional derivative in fractional diffusion processes implies slow diffusion [43–45]. Especially from Figures 1 and 3, we see that the peak of the solution with \(\alpha=0.75\) moves to the boundary faster than that with \(\alpha=0.95\).
Remark 1
We have mentioned that the fractional Burgers equation does have more interesting dynamical properties and modeling advantages than the conventional Burgers equation [27–29, 32, 34]. Comparing with integer-order Burgers models, fractional ones (e.g., with high Reynolds numbers) present rapid degeneracy; see the differences of dynamics between Figures 1-3(a)(b) and Figures 1-3(c)(d). We could also clearly see that the smaller the order of fractional derivative, the faster the diffusion process of Burgers’ equation proceeds. Therefore, the fractional Burgers equation can have more applicable possibilities in traffic flow, conservation law modeling, and turbulence theory. This shall be the fundamental difference between classic and fractional Burgers equations, as well as the basic motivation to further study two-dimensional and three-dimensional temporal and spatial fractional Burgers equations.
5 Conclusion remarks
In this paper, we propose a time-fractional two-dimensional Burgers model which contains a Caputo fractional derivative with order \(\alpha\in(0,1]\). When \(\alpha=1\), the proposed model reduces to the classic Burgers model. We analyze the conservation and dissipation property for both viscid and inviscid fractional Burgers models. To catch the shock wave phenomenon at the wavefront of the fractional Burgers model with high Reynolds number, we implement a mixed algorithm involving time-stepping on temporal variables and the DGM on spatial variables. Numerical simulations are given, which show that the fractional Burgers model preserves the basic property that a shock wave type solution can be found. Meanwhile it exhibits more interesting and rich dynamical behavior by varying the order of fractional derivatives and the Reynolds number. We believe that the shape of the spatial domain may change the dynamics of the fractional Burgers equation, since the shape and volume of the domain determine the differences of eigenvalues of the fractional Burgers equation. More details as regards the fractional Burgers equations (time- and/or space-fractional cases) shall be further studied in the near future.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 11501581), the Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20170628), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 0203-14380012), the Project (No. 502042032) of Central South University and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M570683).
Authors’ contributions
The authors have made the same contribution. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Hopf, E: The partial differential equation \(u_{t}+uu_{x}=\mu u_{xx}\). Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 3(3), 201-230 (1950) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Evans, LC: Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Halabisky, L, Sirovich, L: Evolution of finite disturbances in dissipative gas dynamics. Phys. Fluids 3(16), 360-368 (1973) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Takači, A: Mathematical and simulation models of traffic flow. Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 5, 633-634 (2005) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohwada, T: Cole-Hopf transformation as numerical tool for the Burgers equation. Appl. Comput. Math. 8(1), 107-113 (2009) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, D, Wei, W, Kouri, DJ, Hoffman, DK: Burgers’ equation with high Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 9(6), 1853-1855 (1997) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wazwaz, A: Multiple-front solutions for the Burgers equation and the coupled Burgers equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 190(2), 1198-1206 (2007) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Salas, AHS, Gomez, CAS, Hernańdez, JEC: New abundant solutions for the Burgers equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 58(3), 514-520 (2009) View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Pandey, KB, Verma, L: A note on Crank-Nicolson scheme for Burgers’ equation. Appl. Math. 2(7), 883-889 (2011) View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Hilfer, R: Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (2000) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Metzler, R, Klafter, J: The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 33, 1-77 (2000) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Sabatier, J, Agrawal, OP, Machado, JA: Advances in Fractional Calculus. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Agila, A, Baleanu, D, Eid, R, Irfanoglu, B: Applications of the extended fractional Euler-Lagrange equations model to freely oscillating dynamical systems. Rom. J. Phys. 61, 350-359 (2016) Google Scholar
- Kumar, D, Singh, J, Baleanu, D: A fractional model of convective radial fins with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69(1), Article ID 103 (2017) Google Scholar
- Yang, XJ, Gao, F, Srivastava, HM: New rheological models within local fractional derivative. Rom. Rep. Phys. 69(3), Article ID 113 (2017) Google Scholar
- Laskin, N: Principles of fractional quantum mechanics. In: Fractional Dynamics, pp. 393-427. World Scientific, Singapore (2011) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Atanacković, TM, Pilipović, S, Stanković, B, Zorica, D: Fractional Calculus with Applications in Mechanics: Vibrations and Diffusion Processes. Wiley, New York (2014) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gorguis, A: A comparison between Cole-Hopf transformation and the decomposition method for solving Burgers’ equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 173(1), 126-136 (2006) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Sugimoto, N: Burgers equation with a fractional derivative: hereditary effects on nonlinear acoustic waves. J. Fluid Mech. 225(4), 631-653 (1991) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Y, Baleanu, D, Yang, XJ: New solutions of the transport equations in porous media within local fractional derivative. Proc. Rom. Acad., Ser. A: Math. Phys. Tech. Sci. Inf. Sci. 17, 230-236 (2016) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wang, Q: Numerical solutions for fractional KdV-Burgers equation by Adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 182(2), 1048-1055 (2006) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Chen, Y, An, HL: Numerical solutions of coupled Burgers equations with time- and space-fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 200(1), 87-95 (2008) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Guesmia, A, Daili, N: Numerical approximation of fractional Burgers equation. Commun. Math. Appl. 1(2), 77-90 (2010) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bhrawy, AH: A new spectral algorithm for time-space fractional partial differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion. Proc. Rom. Acad., Ser. A: Math. Phys. Tech. Sci. Inf. Sci. 17, 39-47 (2016) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Abd-Elhameed, WM, Youssri, YH: Spectral solutions for fractional differential equations via a novel Lucas operational matrix of fractional derivatives. Rom. J. Phys. 61, 795-813 (2016) Google Scholar
- Çenesiz, Y, Baleanu, D, Kurt, A, Tasbozan, O: New exact solutions of Burgers’ type equations with conformable derivative. Waves Random Complex Media 27(1), 103-116 (2017) View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, SJ, Jafari, H, Moshokoa, S, Baleanu, D: Laplace homotopy perturbation method for Burgers equation with space-and time-fractional order. Open Phys. 14(1), 247-252 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhrawy, AH, Zaky, MA, Baleanu, D: New numerical approximations for space-time fractional Burgers’ equations via a Legendre spectral-collocation method. Rom. Rep. Phys. 67(2), 340-349 (2015) Google Scholar
- Abdelkawy, MA, Zaky, MA, Bhrawy, AH, Baleanu, D: Numerical simulation of time variable fractional order mobile-immobile advection-dispersion model. Rom. Rep. Phys. 67, 773-791 (2015) Google Scholar
- Nouri, K, Elahi-Mehr, S, Torkzadeh, L: Investigation of the behavior of the fractional Bagley-Torvik and Basset equations via numerical inverse Laplace transform. Rom. Rep. Phys. 68, 503-514 (2016) Google Scholar
- Li, D, Zhang, C, Ran, M: A linear finite difference scheme for generalized time fractional Burgers equation. Appl. Math. Model. 40(11-12), 6069-6081 (2016) View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Abdelwahed, HG, El-Shewy, EK, Mahmoud, AA: On the time fractional modulation for electron acoustic shock waves. Chin. Phys. Lett. 34(03), Article ID 035202 (2017) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao, ZG, Yu, XJ, Wu, D: Numerical solution of the Burgers’ equation by local discontinuous Galerkin method. Appl. Math. Comput. 216(12), 3671-3679 (2010) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- McLean, W, Mustapha, K: Convergence analysis of a discontinuous Galerkin method for a sub-diffusion equation. Numer. Algorithms 5, 69-88 (2009) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Mustapha, K, McLean, W: Piecewise-linear, discontinuous Galerkin method for a fractional diffusion equation. Numer. Algorithms 56, 159-184 (2011) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Deng, WH, Hesthaven, JS: Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for fractional diffusion equations. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 47(6), 1845-1864 (2013) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wei, L, Zhang, X, He, Y: Analysis of a local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-fractional advection-diffusion equations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 23(4), 634-648 (2013) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Xu, Q, Hesthaven, JS: Discontinuous Galerkin method for fractional convection-diffusion equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52(1), 405-423 (2014) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Xu, Q, Zheng, ZS: Discontinuous Galerkin method for time fractional diffusion equation. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 10(11), 3253-3264 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shu, CW: Discontinuous Galerkin methods: general approach and stability. In: Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations Adv. Courses Math. CRM, Barcelona, pp. 149-201. Birkhäuser, Basel (2009) Google Scholar
- Gorenflo, R, Mainardi, F, Moretti, D, Paradisi, P: Time fractional diffusion: a discrete random walk approach. Nonlinear Dyn. 29, 129-143 (2002) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Paradisi, P, Cesari, R, Mainardi, F, Tampieri, F: The fractional Fick’s law for non-local transport processes. Physica A 293, 130-142 (2001) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Neel, MC, Abdennadher, A, Joelson, M: Fractional Fick’s law: the direct way. J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 40, 8299-8314 (2007) View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Valdes-Parada, FJ, Ochoa-Tapia, JA, Alvarez-Ramirez, J: Effective medium equations for fractional Fick’s law in porous media. Physica A 373, 339-353 (2007) View ArticleGoogle Scholar