Skip to content
Open Access

Periodic solutions of p-Laplacian equations with singularities

Advances in Difference Equations20162016:146

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0875-6

Received: 7 January 2016

Accepted: 26 May 2016

Published: 3 June 2016

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of existence of periodic solution is studied for p-Laplacian Liénard equations with singular at \(x=0\) and \(x=+\infty\). By using the topological degree theory, some new results are obtained, and an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of our results. Our research enriches the contents of second order differential equations with singularity.

Keywords

Liénard equationtopological degreesingularityperiodic solution

1 Introduction

The problem of periodic solution for ordinary differential equations with singularities has attracted much attention of many researchers because of its background in the applied sciences [16]. Lazer and Solimini in [7] considered in 1987 problems of periodic solutions for the equation with a singularity suggested by the two fundamental examples
$$ x''+\frac{1}{x^{\alpha}}=h(t) $$
(1.1)
(attractive restoring force) and
$$ x''-\frac{1}{x^{\alpha}}=h(t) $$
(1.2)
(repulsive restoring force), where \(\alpha>0\) is a constant and \(h: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is a T-periodic continuous function. A necessary condition for the existence of a positive T-periodic solution of equation (1.1) is that \(\bar{h}>0\), and a necessary condition for the existence of a positive T-periodic solution for equation (1.2) is that \(\bar{h}<0\), as shown by integrating both members of the equations from 0 to T. By using the techniques of upper and lower solutions in equation (1.1) and the methods of Schauder fixed point theory in equation (1.2), respectively, they have shown that those conditions are also sufficient if, in equation (1.2), one assumes in addition that \(\alpha\ge1\). Jebelean and Mawhin in [8] considered the problems of a p-Laplacian Liénard equation of the form
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x' \bigr)'+f(x)x'+g(x)=h(t) $$
(1.3)
and
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x' \bigr)'+f(x)x'-g(x)=h(t), $$
(1.4)
where \(p>1\) is a constant, \(f: [0,+\infty)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is an arbitrary continuous function, \(h: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is a T-periodic function with \(h\in L^{\infty}[0,T]\). They extend the result of Lazer and Solimini in [7] to p-Laplacian-Liénard equations. We notice that all the restoring force terms in the equations studied by [7, 8] are not singular at \(x=+\infty\). So far, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are few results for the problem of equation with singular at \(x=+\infty\). For example, Zhang in [9] studied the problem of periodic solutions of the Liénard equation with a repulsive singularity at \(x=0\) and a small singular force condition at \(x=+\infty\),
$$ x''+f(x)x'+g(t,x)=0,\quad 0< t< T. $$
By using Mawhin’s continuation theorem of the coincidence degree theory [10], some results on the existence of periodic solutions were obtained. In [11], Wang further studied the existence of positive periodic solutions for a delay Liénard equation with a repulsive singularity at \(x=0\) and a small singular force condition at \(x=+\infty\),
$$ x''+f(x)x'+g\bigl(t,x(t-\tau)\bigr)=0, \quad 0< t< T. $$
In [1214], the problem of existence of periodic solutions for some p-Laplacian Liénard equations were studied. However, the restoring forces term in these equations are all independent of variable t.
Motivated by the above mentioned work, in this paper, we study the existence of positive T-periodic solutions for p-Laplacian-like operators with singularity of the form
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x' \bigr)'+f(x)x'+g_{1}(x)+g_{2}(t,x)=h(t) $$
(1.5)
and
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x' \bigr)'+f(x)x'-g_{1}(x)+g_{2}(t,x)=h(t), $$
(1.6)
where \(p>1\) is a constant, \(f:[0,\infty)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is an arbitrary continuous function, \(g_{2}: \mathbb{R}\times[0,+\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function with \(g_{2}(t+T,x)=g_{2}(t,x)\) for all \((t,x)\in\mathbb{R}\times[0,+\infty)\), \(g_{1}\in C((0,+\infty), (0,+\infty))\) and \(\lim_{x\rightarrow 0+}g_{1}(x)=+\infty\), \(h: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is a T-periodic function with \(h\in L^{1}([0,T], \mathbb{R})\). From the corresponding definitions in [3, 79], we see that equation (1.5) and equation (1.6) are all singular at \(x=0\) and equation (1.5) is of attractive type and equation (1.6) is of repulsive type.

The interesting thing is that the main results in this paper can be applied to any damping forces term \(f(x)x'\) without imposing more conditions on it than that of \(f\in C([0,+\infty),\mathbb{R})\), and we not only consider equation (1.6) with a repulsive singularity at \(x=0\), but we also consider equation (1.5) with a attractive singularity at \(x=0\). Furthermore, for equation (1.5) and equation (1.6), besides \(g_{1}(x)\) being singular at \(x=0\), we allow \(g_{2}(t,x)\) to be singular at \(x=+\infty\). Of course, a further growing restriction on \(g_{2}(t,x)\) with respect to variable x will be needed.

2 Preliminary lemmas

The following two lemmas (Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2) are all consequences of Theorem 3.1 in [15].

Lemma 2.1

Assume that there exist constants \(0< M_{0}< M_{1}\), \(M_{2}>0\), such that the following conditions hold.
  1. 1.
    For each \(\lambda\in(0,1]\), each possible positive T-periodic solution x to the equation
    $$ \bigl(\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}u' \bigr)'+\lambda f(u)u'+\lambda g_{1}(u)+ \lambda g_{2}(t,u)=\lambda h(t) $$
    satisfies the inequalities \(M_{0}< u(t)< M_{1}\) and \(|u'(t)|< M_{2}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\).
     
  2. 2.
    Each possible solution c to the equation
    $$ g_{1}(c)+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,c)\,dt-\bar{h}=0 $$
    satisfies the inequality \(M_{0}< c< M_{1}\).
     
  3. 3.
    We have
    $$ \biggl(g_{1}(M_{0})+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,M_{0}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr) \biggl(g_{1}(M_{1})+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,M_{1}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr)< 0. $$
     
Then equation (1.5) has at least one T-periodic solution u such that \(M_{0}< u(t)< M_{1}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\).

Lemma 2.2

Assume that there exist constants \(0< M_{0}< M_{1}\), \(M_{2}>0\), such that the following conditions hold.
  1. 1.
    For each \(\lambda\in(0,1]\), each possible positive T-periodic solution x to the equation
    $$ \bigl(\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}u' \bigr)'+\lambda f(u)u'-\lambda g_{1}(u)+ \lambda g_{2}(t,u)=\lambda h(t) $$
    satisfies the inequalities \(M_{0}< u(t)< M_{1}\) and \(|u'(t)|< M_{2}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\).
     
  2. 2.
    Each possible solution c to the equation
    $$ g_{1}(c)-\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,c)\,dt+\bar{h}=0 $$
    satisfies the inequality \(M_{0}< c< M_{1}\).
     
  3. 3.
    We have
    $$ \biggl(g_{1}(M_{0})-\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,M_{0}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr) \biggl(g_{1}(M_{1})-\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,M_{1}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr)< 0. $$
     
Then equation (1.6) has at least one T-periodic solution u such that \(M_{0}< u(t)< m_{1}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\).

Lemma 2.3

[5]

Let u be an arbitrary function in \(W^{1,p}([0,T],R^{n})\) with \(u(0)=u(T)=0\), then
$$\biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\, dt \biggr)^{1/p}\le\frac{\pi_{p}}{T} \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\, dt \biggr)^{1/p}, $$
where \(\pi_{p}=\frac{2\pi(p-1)^{1/p}}{p\sin(\frac{\pi}{p})}\), \(p\in (1,+\infty)\).
In order to study the existence of positive periodic solutions to equation (1.5) and equation (1.6), we list the following assumptions:
(H1): 

\(\lim\inf_{u\rightarrow0^{+}}[g_{1}(u)+g_{2}(t,u)-\bar {h}]>0\) uniformly for all \(t\in[0,T]\);

(H2): 

\(\lim\sup_{u\rightarrow+\infty}[g_{1}(u)+g_{2}(t,u)-\bar {h}]<0\) uniformly for all \(t\in[0,T]\);

(H3): 

\(\lim\inf_{u\rightarrow0^{+}}[g_{1}(u)-g_{2}(t,u)+\bar {h}]>0\) uniformly for all \(t\in[0,T]\);

(H4): 

\(\lim\sup_{u\rightarrow+\infty}[g_{1}(u)-g_{2}(t,u)+\bar {h}]<0\) uniformly for all \(t\in[0,T]\).

Now, we embed equation (1.5) and equation (1.6) into the following two equations family with a parameter \(\lambda\in(0,1)\), respectively,
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x'\bigr)'+\lambda f(x)x'+ \lambda g_{1}(x)+\lambda g_{2}(t,x)=\lambda h(t),\quad \lambda\in(0,1] $$
(2.1)
and
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert x'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}x'\bigr)'+\lambda f(x)x'- \lambda g_{1}(x)+\lambda g_{2}(t,x)=\lambda h(t),\quad \lambda\in(0,1]. $$
(2.2)

Lemma 2.4

Assume that assumptions (H1) and (H2) hold, then there exist constants \(D_{1}\) and \(D_{2}\) with \(0< D_{1}< D_{2}\) such that
  1. (1)
    for each possible positive T-periodic solution \(u(t)\) of equation (2.1), there exist \(t_{0},t_{1}\in[0,T]\) such that
    $$u(t_{0})>D_{1}\quad \textit{and} \quad u(t_{1})< D_{2}; $$
     
  2. (2)

    \(g_{1}(u)+\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt-\bar{h}>0\) for all \(u\in (0,D_{1}]\), and \(g_{1}(u)+\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt-\bar{h}<0\) for all \(u\in[D_{2},+\infty)\).

     

Proof

Assumption (H1) implies the existence of some \(D_{1}>0\) such that
$$ g_{1}(u)+g_{2}(t,u)-\bar{h}>0, $$
(2.3)
whenever \((t,u)\in[0,T]\times(0, D_{1}]\). Consequently,
$$ g_{1}(u)+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt-\bar{h}>0\quad \mbox{for all } u\in(0,D_{1}]. $$
(2.4)
Let \(u(t)\) be a positive T-periodic solution to equation (2.1). If \(0< u(t)\le D_{1}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\), it follows from (2.3) that
$$ g_{1}\bigl(u(t)\bigr)+g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)-\bar{h}>0, \quad \forall t\in[0,T] $$
and hence
$$ \frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[g_{1}\bigl(u(t) \bigr)+g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)-\bar{h}\bigr]\,dt>0. $$
(2.5)
But, by integrating equation (2.1) over \([0,T]\) and using the periodic condition, we have
$$ 0=\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[g_{1}\bigl(u(t) \bigr)+g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)-h(t)\bigr]\,dt=\frac {1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[g_{1}(u)+g_{2}(t,u)- \bar{h}\bigr]\,dt, $$
(2.6)
which contradicts (2.5). This contradiction implies that there is a \(t_{0}\in[0,T]\) such that
$$ u(t_{0})>D_{1}. $$
(2.7)
On the other hand, assumption (H2) implies the existence of some \(D_{2}>D_{1}\) such that
$$ g_{1}(u)+g_{2}(t,u)-\bar{h}< 0, $$
(2.8)
whenever \((t,u)\in[0,T]\times(D_{2}, +\infty)\) and then
$$ g_{1}(u)+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt-\bar{h}>0\quad \mbox{for all } u\in(D_{2}, +\infty) . $$
(2.9)
Let \(u(t)\) be an arbitrary positive T-periodic solution to equation (2.1). If \(u(t)\geq D_{2}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\), then by (2.8) we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[g_{1}\bigl(u(t) \bigr)+g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)-h(t)\bigr]\,dt \\& \quad =\frac {1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[g_{1}\bigl(u(t) \bigr)+g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)-\bar{h}\bigr]\,dt< 0. \end{aligned}$$
(2.10)
Comparing (2.6) with (2.10), we see that there exists some \(t_{1}\in[0,T]\) such that
$$ u(t_{1})< D_{2}. $$
(2.11)
Clearly, (2.7) and (2.11) ensure that conclusion (1) of Lemma 2.4 holds, and conclusion (2) of Lemma 2.4 follows from (2.4) and (2.9). □

By a similar arguing to the proof of Lemma 2.4, we obtain the following result.

Lemma 2.5

Assume that assumptions (H3) and (H4) hold, then there exist constant \(0< D_{3}< D_{4}\) such that
  1. (1)
    for each possible positive T-periodic solution \(u(t)\) of equation (2.2) there exist \(t_{0},t_{1}\in[0,T]\) such that
    $$u(t_{0})>D_{3} \quad \textit{and}\quad u(t_{1})< D_{4}; $$
     
  2. (2)

    \(g_{1}(u)-\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt+\bar{h}>0\) for all \(u\in (0,D_{3}]\), and \(g_{1}(u)-\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,u)\,dt+\bar{h}<0\) for all \(u\in[D_{4},+\infty)\).

     

3 Main results

Theorem 3.1

Assume that (H1) and (H2), together with the following assumptions, hold:
(H5): 

\(\int_{0}^{1}g_{1}(u)\,du=+\infty\);

(H6): 

there are constants \(a\ge0\) and \(b>0\) such that \(|g_{2}(t,u)|\leq au^{p-1}+b\) for all \((t,u)\in[0,T]\times(0,+\infty )\);

(H7): 

\((2aT)^{\frac{1}{p}} (\frac{\pi_{p}}{T} )^{\frac {p-1}{p}}<1\), where \(\pi_{p}\) is a positive constant which is determined by Lemma  2.3.

Then equation (1.5) has at least one positive T-periodic solution.

Proof

First of all, we will show that there exist \(M_{1}\), \(M_{2}\) with \(M_{1}>D_{1}\) and \(M_{2}>0\) such that each positive T-periodic solution \(u(t)\) of equation (2.1) satisfies the inequalities
$$ u(t)< M_{1},\qquad \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert < M_{2}. $$
(3.1)
In fact, if u is a positive T-periodic solution of equation (2.1), then
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}u'\bigr)'+\lambda f(u)u'+ \lambda g_{1}(u)+\lambda g_{2}(t,u)=\lambda h(t), \quad \lambda\in(0,1]. $$
(3.2)
Integrating (3.2) over the interval \([0,T]\), we have
$$ \int_{0}^{T} g_{1}\bigl(u(t)\bigr)\,dt+ \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)\,dt= \int_{0}^{T}h(t)\,dt. $$
(3.3)
Multiply (3.3) with \(u(t)\) and integrating it over the interval \([0,T]\), we have
$$\int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt=\lambda \int_{0}^{T}g_{1}\bigl(u(t)\bigr)u(t)\, dt+\lambda \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)u(t) \,dt-\lambda \int _{0}^{T}h(t)u(t)\,dt, $$
which together with (3.3) yields
$$\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p} \leq&\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}g_{1}\bigl(u(t)\bigr)\, dt+ \lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,dt \\ &{}+\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty } \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(t)\bigr\vert \,dt \\ \leq&\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl[h(t)-g_{2}\bigl(t,u(t) \bigr)\bigr]\,dt+\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,dt \\ &{}+\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(t)\bigr\vert \,dt \\ \leq&2\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(t,u(t)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,dt+2\lambda \vert u\vert _{\infty} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(t)\bigr\vert \,dt. \end{aligned}$$
(3.4)
It follows from (H6) that
$$ \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\leq2\vert u\vert _{\infty} \biggl( a \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1}+bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}} \biggr). $$
With \(t_{1}\) given by Lemma 2.4,
$$ u(t)=u(t_{1})+ \int_{t_{1}}^{t}u'(s)\, ds, $$
and hence, by the Hölder inequality, we get
$$ u(t)< D_{2}+T^{\frac{1}{q}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} $$
(3.5)
for all \(t\in[0,T]\) (\(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\)). This together with (3.4) gives
$$\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \leq&2 \biggl[D_{2}+T^{\frac{1}{q}} \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggr] \biggl[a \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1}\,dt+bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}} \biggr] \\ \leq&2 \biggl[D_{2}+T^{\frac{1}{q}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\, dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggr] \\ &{}\times\biggl[aT^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}}+bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}} \biggr] \\ \leq&2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \\ &{}+2aT \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac {1}{p}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \\ &{}+2T^{\frac{1}{q}} \bigl(bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}} \bigr) \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}+2D_{2}\bigl(bT+\|h \|_{L_{1}}\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)
Let \(v(t)=u(t)-u(t_{1})\), then \(v(t_{1})=0=v(t_{1}+T)\). By using Lemma 2.3, we have
$$ \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)-u(t_{1}) \bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}\leq\frac {\pi_{p}}{T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}; $$
and then
$$\begin{aligned} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} =& \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)-u(t_{1})+u(t_{1}) \bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\ \le& \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t)-u(t_{1}) \bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}+ \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u(t_{1})\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\ \le&\frac{\pi_{p}}{T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac {1}{p}}+D_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}}. \end{aligned}$$
By substituting into (3.6), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \leq&2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl[ \frac{\pi _{p}}{T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac {1}{p}}+D_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggr]^{p-1} \\ &{}+2aT \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl[\frac{\pi _{p}}{T} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}+D_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggr]^{p-1} \\ &{}+2T^{\frac{1}{q}}\bigl(bT+\Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}}\bigr) \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}+2D_{2}\bigl(bT+ \Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}}\bigr), \end{aligned}$$
i.e.,
$$\begin{aligned}& \biggl(1-(2aT)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl(\frac{\pi_{p}}{T} \biggr)^{\frac {p-1}{p}} \biggr) \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\& \quad \leq\bigl(2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}}\bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl( \frac{\pi_{p}}{T} \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac {p-1}{p^{2}}} \\& \qquad {}+\bigl(2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}}D_{2}^{\frac {p-1}{p}}T^{\frac{p-1}{p^{2}}}+ \bigl[2D_{2}\bigl(bT+\Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}}\bigr) \bigr]^{\frac {1}{p}} \\& \qquad {} +(2aT)^{\frac{1}{p}}\bigl(D_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \bigr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p^{2}}} \\& \qquad {}+\bigl(2T^{\frac {1}{q}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}}\bigl(bT+\Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl( \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p^{2}}} \\& \quad =\bigl(2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}}\bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \biggl( \frac{\pi _{p}}{T} \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{p-1}{p^{2}}} \\& \qquad {}+\bigl(2aD_{2}T^{\frac{1}{p}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p}}D_{2}^{\frac {p-1}{p}}T^{\frac{p-1}{p^{2}}}+ \bigl[2D_{2}\bigl(bT+\Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}}\bigr) \bigr]^{\frac {1}{p}} \\& \qquad {} + \bigl[(2aT)^{\frac{1}{p}}\bigl(D_{2}T^{\frac{1}{q}} \bigr)^{\frac {p-1}{p}}+2^{\frac{1}{p}}T^{\frac{1}{pq}}\bigl(bT+\Vert h\Vert _{L_{1}}\bigr)^{\frac {1}{p}} \bigr] \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p^{2}}}. \end{aligned}$$
Since \(\frac{1}{p}>\max\{\frac{1}{p^{2}}, \frac{p-1}{p^{2}}\}\), it follows from (H5) that there exists a positive constant \(C_{1}\) such that
$$ \biggl( \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p}\,dt \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}}< C_{1}. $$
Then, by (3.5), we get
$$ u(t)< D_{2}+T^{\frac{1}{q}}C_{1}=:M_{1} \quad \mbox{for all } t\in\mathbb{R}. $$
(3.7)
Now, if u attains its maximum over \([0,T]\) at \(t_{2}\in[0,T]\), then \(u'(t_{2})=0\) and we deduce from (3.2) that
$$ \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-2}u'(t)= \lambda \int _{t_{2}}^{t}\bigl[-f(u)u'-g_{1}(u)-g_{2}(t,u)+h(t) \bigr]\,dt $$
for all \(t\in[0,T]\). Thus, if \(F'=f\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1} \leq& \lambda\bigl\vert F\bigl(u(t)\bigr)-F\bigl(u(t_{2})\bigr)\bigr\vert \\ &{}+\lambda\biggl\vert \int _{t_{2}}^{t}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(s,u(s)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds+\lambda \int_{t_{2}}^{t}g_{1}\bigl(u(s)\bigr)\,ds+ \lambda \int _{t_{2}}^{t}\bigl\vert h(s)\bigr\vert \,ds \biggr\vert \\ \leq& 2\lambda\max_{0\leq u\leq R}\bigl\vert F(u)\bigr\vert + \lambda \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(s,u(s)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds \\ &{}+\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{1}\bigl(u(s) \bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds+\lambda \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(s)\bigr\vert \,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.8)
Since \(g_{1}\in C((0,+\infty),(0,\infty))\), it follows from (3.3) that
$$\int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{1}\bigl(u(s) \bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds= \int_{0}^{T}g_{1}\bigl(u(s)\bigr)\,ds\le \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(s,u(s)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds+ \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(s)\bigr\vert \,ds. $$
Substituting it into (3.8), we have
$$ \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1}\leq 2\lambda\max _{0\leq u\leq R}\bigl\vert F(u)\bigr\vert +2\lambda \int _{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2} \bigl(s,u(s)\bigr)\bigr\vert \,ds+2\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert h(s)\bigr\vert \,ds. $$
Using (H6), we obtain
$$ \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1}\leq 2\lambda\max _{0\leq u\leq R}\bigl\vert F(u)\bigr\vert +2\lambda \bigl(aM_{1}^{p-1}+bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}}\bigr). $$
Thus, we have
$$ \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert ^{p-1}< \lambda C_{2},\quad \forall t\in[0,T], $$
(3.9)
and then
$$ \bigl\vert u'(t)\bigr\vert < C_{2}^{\frac{1}{p-1}}:=M_{2}, \quad \forall t\in[0,T], $$
(3.10)
where \(C_{2}=2\max_{0\leq u\leq R}|F(u)|+2(aM_{1}^{p-1}+bT+\|h\|_{L_{1}})+1\). Equations (3.7) and (3.10) ensure that (3.1) holds.
Below, we will show that there exists a constant \(M_{0}\in(0,D_{1})\), such that each positive T-periodic solution of equation (2.1) satisfies
$$ u(t)>M_{0}\quad \mbox{for all } t\in[0,T]. $$
(3.11)
Suppose that \(u(t)\) is an arbitrary positive T-periodic solution of equation (2.1), then \(u(t)\) satisfies equation (3.2), i.e.,
$$ \bigl(\bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert ^{p-2}u'\bigr)'+\lambda f(u)u'+ \lambda g_{1}(u)+\lambda g_{2}(t,u)=\lambda h(t),\quad \lambda\in(0,1). $$
(3.12)
Let \(t_{0}\) be determined in Lemma 2.4. Multiplying (3.12) by \(u'(t)\) and integrating over the interval \([t_{0},t]\) (or \([t,t_{0}]\)), we get
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{t_{0}}^{t}\bigl(\bigl\vert u'(s) \bigr\vert ^{p-2}u'(s)\bigr)'u'(s) \,ds+\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t} f\bigl(u(s)\bigr) \bigl(u'(s) \bigr)^{2}\,ds \\& \qquad {}+\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t} g_{1}\bigl(u(s) \bigr)u'(s)\,ds+\lambda \int _{t_{0}}^{t}g_{2}\bigl(s,u(s) \bigr)u'(s)\,ds \\& \quad =\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t} h(s)u'(s)\,ds,\quad \lambda\in(0,1). \end{aligned}$$
(3.13)
Set \(y(t)=|u'(t)|^{p-2}u'(t)\), then \(y(t)\) is absolutely continuous and \(u'(t)=|y(t)|^{q-2}y(t)\), where \(q\in(1,+\infty)\) with \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\). So
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{t_{0}}^{t}\bigl(\bigl\vert u'(s) \bigr\vert ^{p-2}u'(s)\bigr)'u'(s) \,ds \\& \quad = \int _{t_{0}}^{t}\bigl\vert y(s)\bigr\vert ^{q-2}y(s)y'(s)\,ds =\frac{\vert y(t)\vert ^{q}}{q}-\frac{\vert y(t_{0})\vert ^{q}}{q}= \frac{\vert u'(t)\vert ^{p}}{q}-\frac {\vert u'(t_{0})\vert ^{p}}{q}. \end{aligned}$$
Substituting into (3.13), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} &\frac{\vert u'(t)\vert ^{p}}{q}-\frac{\vert u'(t_{0})\vert ^{p}}{q}+\lambda \int _{t_{0}}^{t}f(u) \bigl(u' \bigr)^{2}\,dt \\ &\quad =-\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t}g_{1}(u)u'\, dt-\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t}g_{2}(t,u)u' \,dt+\lambda \int_{t_{0}}^{t} h(t)u'\,dt, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
which yields the estimate
$$\begin{aligned} \lambda \int_{u(t)}^{u(t_{0})}g_{1}(s)\,ds \leq& \frac{\vert u'(t)\vert ^{p}}{q}+\frac {\vert u'(t_{0})\vert ^{p}}{q}+\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert f(u)\bigr\vert \bigl(u'\bigr)^{2}\,dt \\ &{}+\lambda \int_{0}^{T}\bigl\vert g_{2}(t,u)\bigr\vert \bigl\vert u'\bigr\vert \,dt+\lambda \int_{0}^{T} \bigl\vert h(t)u'\bigr\vert \,dt. \end{aligned}$$
From (3.9) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \lambda \int_{u(t)}^{u(t_{0})}g_{1}(s)\,ds \leq& \frac{2\lambda C_{2}^{\frac {p}{p-1}}}{q}+\lambda\Bigl(\max_{0\leq u\leq M_{2}}\bigl\vert f(u)\bigr\vert \Bigr)TC_{2}^{\frac {2}{p-1}} \\ &{}+\lambda\bigl(aM_{1}^{p-1}+bT \bigr)C_{2}^{\frac{1}{p-1}}+\lambda\|h\| _{L_{1}}C_{2}^{\frac{1}{p-1}}, \end{aligned}$$
which gives
$$ \int_{u(t)}^{u(t_{0})}g_{1}(s)\,ds\leq C_{3}\quad \mbox{for all } t\in[t_{0},t_{0}+T] $$
(3.14)
with
$$ C_{3}= \frac{2C_{2}^{\frac{p}{p-1}}}{q}+\Bigl(\max_{0\leq u\leq M_{2}}\bigl\vert f(u)\bigr\vert \Bigr)TC_{2}^{\frac{2}{p-1}}+ \bigl(aM_{1}^{p-1}+bT\bigr)C_{2}^{\frac {1}{p-1}}+\|h \|_{L_{1}}C_{2}^{\frac{1}{p-1}}. $$
From (H6) there exists \(M_{0}\in(0,D_{1})\) such that
$$ \int_{\eta}^{D_{1}}g_{2}(s) \,ds>C_{3}\quad \mbox{for all } \eta\in(0,M_{0}]. $$
(3.15)
Therefore, if there is a \(t^{*}\in[t_{0},t_{0}+T]\) such that \(u(t^{*})\le M_{0}\), then from (3.15) we get
$$ \int_{u(t^{*})}^{u(t_{0})}g_{1}(s)\,ds\ge \int_{u(t^{*})}^{D_{1}}g_{1}(s)\,ds> C_{3}, $$
which contradicts (3.14). This contradiction shows that \(u(t)>M_{0}\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\). So (3.11) holds. Let \(m_{0}\in(0, M_{0})\) and \(m_{1}\in(M_{1}+D_{2}, +\infty)\) be two constants, then from (3.2) and (3.11), we see that each possible positive T-periodic solution u satisfies
$$ m_{0}< u(t)< m_{1},\qquad \bigl\vert u'(t) \bigr\vert < M_{2}. $$
This implies that condition 1 and condition 2 of Lemma 2.1 are satisfied. Also, we can deduce from Lemma 2.4 that
$$ g_{1}(c)+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,c)\,dt-\bar{h}>0\quad \mbox{for } c\in (0, m_{0}] $$
and
$$ g_{1}(c)+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,c)\,dt-\bar{h}< 0\quad \mbox{for } c\in [ m_{1},+\infty), $$
which results in
$$ \biggl(g_{1}(m_{0})+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,m_{0}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr) \biggl(g_{1}(m_{1})+\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T}g_{2}(t,m_{1}) \,dt-\bar{h} \biggr)< 0. $$
So condition 3 of Lemma 2.1 holds. By using Lemma 2.1, we see that equation (1.5) has at least one positive T-periodic solution. The proof is complete. □

By using Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 2.2, we can obtain the following result.

Theorem 3.2

Assume that (H3) and (H4), together with the following assumptions hold:
(H5): 

\(\int_{0}^{1}g_{1}(u)\,du=+\infty\);

(H6): 

there are constants \(a\ge0\) and \(b>0\) such that \(|g_{2}(t,u)|\leq au^{p-1}+b\) for all \((t,u)\in[0,T]\times(0,+\infty )\);

(H7): 

\((aT)^{\frac{1}{p}} (\frac{\pi_{p}}{T} )^{\frac {p-1}{p}}<1\), where \(\pi_{p}\) is a positive constant which is determined by Lemma  2.3.

Then equation (1.6) has at least one positive T-periodic solution.

Example 3.1

Consider the following equation:
$$ x''(t)+f\bigl(x(t)\bigr)x'(t)+ \frac{1}{x^{2}(t)}-a\biggl(1+\frac{1}{2}\sin t\biggr)x(t)=\cos t, $$
(3.16)
where f is an arbitrary continuous function, \(a\in(0,\frac{1}{3\pi} )\) is a constant. Corresponding to equation (1.5), we can assume that \(g_{1}(u)=\frac{1}{u^{2}}\), \(g_{2}(t,u)=a(1+\sin t)u\), and \(h(t)=\cos t\). By simple calculating, we can verify that assumptions (H1)-(H2), (H5)-(H7) are all satisfied. Thus, by using Theorem 3.1, we see that equation (3.16) has at least one positive 2π-periodic solution.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11271197). The authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved this paper.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

References

  1. Lei, J, Zhang, MR: Twist property of periodic motion of an atom near a charged wire. Lett. Math. Phys. 60(1), 9-17 (2002) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Torres, PJ: Existence and stability of periodic solutions for second order semilinear differential equations with a singular nonlinearity. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 137, 195-201 (2007) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Hakl, R, Torres, PJ: On periodic solutions of second-order differential equations with attractive-repulsive singularities. J. Differ. Equ. 248, 111-126 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Fabry, C, Fayyad, D: Periodic solutions of second order differential equations with a p-Laplacian and asymmetric nonlinearities. Rend. Ist. Mat. Univ. Trieste 24, 207-227 (1992) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang, MR: Nonuniform nonresonance at the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 29(1), 41-51 (1997) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu, JF, Torres, PJ, Zhang, MR: Periodic solutions of second order non-autonomous singular dynamical systems. J. Differ. Equ. 239, 196-212 (2007) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Lazer, AC, Solimini, S: On periodic solutions of nonlinear differential equations with singularities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 99, 109-114 (1987) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Jebelean, P, Mawhin, J: Periodic solutions of singular nonlinear perturbations of the ordinary p-Laplacian. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 2(3), 299-312 (2002) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang, MR: Periodic solutions of Liénard equations with singular forces of repulsive type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 203, 254-269 (1996) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaines, RE, Mawhin, J: Coincidence Degree and Nonlinear Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 568. Springer, Berlin (1977) MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, ZH: Periodic solutions of Liénard equations with a singularity and a deviating argument. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 16, 227-234 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Rachunková, I, Tvrdy, M: Periodic singular problem with quasilinear differential operator. Math. Bohem. 3, 321-336 (2006) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, B: Periodic solutions of dissipative dynamical systems with singular potential and p-Laplacian. Ann. Pol. Math. 79, 109-120 (2002) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Jebelean, P, Mawhin, J: Periodic solutions of forced dissipative p-Liénard equations with singularities. Vietnam J. Math. 32, 97-103 (2004) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Manásevich, R, Mawhin, J: Periodic solutions for nonlinear systems with p-Laplacian-like operators. J. Differ. Equ. 145, 367-393 (1998) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lu et al. 2016