Open Access

Analytical study of time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by using transform methods

Advances in Difference Equations20162016:61

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0783-9

Received: 12 December 2015

Accepted: 8 February 2016

Published: 29 February 2016

Abstract

In this paper, we establish a modified reduced differential transform method and a new iterative Elzaki transform method, which are successfully applied to obtain the analytical solutions of the time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations. The obtained results show that the proposed techniques are simple, efficient, and easy to implement for fractional differential equations.

Keywords

Elzaki transform fractional Navier-Stokes equation reduced differential transform method

1 Introduction

In recent years, the fractional differential equations have been used in various fields such as colored noise, electromagnetic waves, boundary layer effects in ducts, viscoelastic mechanics, diffusion processes, and so on [15]. However, most fractional differential equations are very difficult to exactly solve, so numerical and approximation techniques have to be used. Recently, many powerful methods have been used to approximate linear and nonlinear fractional differential equations. These methods include the Adomain decomposition method (ADM) [6, 7], the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) [812], the variational iteration method (VIM) [13, 14], and so on.

The time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation can be written in operator form as [15, 16]
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} D^{\alpha}_{t}u+(u\cdot\nabla)u=-\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla{p}+v\nabla^{2}u,\\ \nabla\cdot u=0,\quad 0< \alpha\leq1, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(1.1)
where \(D_{t}^{\alpha}=\frac{\partial^{\alpha}}{\partial{t^{\alpha}}}\) is the Caputo fractional derivative of order α, p is the pressure, ρ is the density, u is the velocity, v is the kinematic viscosity, and t is the time. When \(\alpha=1\), equation (1.1) is the classical Navier-Stokes equation, the form given by
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{t}+(u\cdot \nabla)u=-\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla{p}+v\nabla^{2}u,\\ \nabla\cdot u=0. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(1.2)

In this paper, we consider the unsteady flow of a viscous fluid in a tube, the velocity field is a function of only one space coordinate, the time is a dependent variable. This kind of time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation has been studied by Momani and Odibat [15], Kumar et al. [16, 17], and Khan [18] by using the Adomian decomposition method (ADM), the homotopy perturbation transform method (HPTM), the modified Laplace decomposition method (MLDM), the variational iteration method (VIM), and the homotopy perturbation method (HPM), respectively.

In 2006, Daftardar-Gejji and Jafari [19] were first to propose the Gejji-Jafari iteration method for solving a linear and nonlinear fractional differential equation. The Gejji-Jafari iteration method is easy to implement and obtains a highly accurate result. The reduced differential transform method (RDTM) was first proposed by Keskin and Oturanc [20, 21]. The RDTM was also applied by many researchers to handle nonlinear equations arising in science and engineering. In recent years, Kumar et al. [2228] used various methods to study the solutions of linear and nonlinear fractional differential equation combined with a Laplace transform.

Based on the Gejji-Jafari iteration method and RDTM, we established the new iterative Elzaki transform method (NIETM) and the modified reduced differential transform method (MRDTM) with the help of the Elzaki transform [29, 30] and we successfully applied this to time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations. The results show that our proposed methods are efficient and easy to implement with less computation for fractional differential equations.

2 Basic definitions

In this section, we set up notation and review some basic definitions from fractional calculus and Elzaki transforms.

Definition 2.1

A real function \(f(x)\), \(x>0\), is said to be in the space \(C_{\mu}\), \(\mu\in{R}\) if there exists a real number p (\(p>\mu\)), such that \(f(x)=x^{p}f_{1}(x)\), where \(f_{1}(x)\in{C[0,\infty)}\), and it is said to be in the space \(C_{\mu}^{m}\) if \(f^{(m)}\in{C_{\mu}}\), \(m\in{N}\).

Definition 2.2

The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of order \(\alpha\geq 0\), of a function \(f(x)\in{C_{\mu}}\), \(\mu\geq-1\) is defined as [5]
$$ I^{\alpha}f(x)= \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{0}^{x}(x-t)^{\alpha-1}f(t)\,dt, \quad \alpha >0, x>0,\\ I^{0}f(x)=f(x), \quad\alpha=0, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(2.1)
where \(\Gamma(\cdot)\) is the well-known Gamma function.

Definition 2.3

The fractional derivative of \(f(x)\) in the Caputo sense is defined as [5]
$$ D^{\alpha}f(x)=I^{n-\alpha}D^{n}f(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-\alpha)} \int _{0}^{x}(x-t)^{n-\alpha-1}f^{(n)}(t)\,dt, $$
(2.2)
where \(n-1<\alpha\leq{n}\), \(n\in{N}\), \(x>0\), \(f\in{C_{-1}^{n}}\).
The following are the basic properties of the operator \(D^{\alpha}\):
$$\begin{aligned} &(1)\quad D^{\alpha}I^{\alpha}f(x)=f(x), \\ &(2)\quad I^{\alpha}D^{\alpha}f(x)=f(x)-\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}f^{(k)} \bigl(0^{+} \bigr)\frac {x}{k!},\quad x>0. \end{aligned}$$

Definition 2.4

The Elzaki transform is defined over the set of functions \(A=\{f(t):\exists{M},k_{1},k_{2}>0,|f(t)|< Me^{\frac{|t|}{k}},t\in (-1)^{j},X\in[0,\infty)\}\) by the following formula [29, 30]:
$$T(s)=E \bigl[f(t) \bigr]=s \int_{s}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{t}{s}}f(t)\,dt,\quad s \in[-k_{1},k_{2}]. $$

Lemma 2.1

The Elzaki transform of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is defined as follows [29, 30]:
$$ E \bigl[I^{\alpha}f(t) \bigr]=s^{\alpha+1}T(s). $$
(2.3)

Lemma 2.2

The Elzaki transform of the Caputo fractional derivative is given as follows [29, 30]:
$$ E \bigl[D_{x}^{n\alpha}u(x,t) \bigr]=\frac{T(s)}{s^{n\alpha}}-\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}s^{2-n\alpha+k}u^{(k)}(0,t), \quad n-1< n\alpha\leq{n}. $$
(2.4)

3 New iterative Elzaki transform method (NIETM)

Consider an unsteady, one-dimensional motion of a viscous fluid in a tube. The equations of motions which govern the flow field in the tube are the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates and they are given by [15, 16]
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{t}=-\frac{1}{\rho}p_{z}+v(u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}),\\ u(r,0)=f(r). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.1)
If the fractional derivative model is used to present the time derivative term, the equation of motion (3.1) assumes the form
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{t}^{\alpha}=P+v(u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}), \quad 0< \alpha\leq1,\\ u(r,0)=f(r), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.2)
where \(P=-\frac{1}{\rho}p_{z}\).
Applying the Elzaki transform on both sides of equation (3.2), we have
$$ E \bigl[u_{t}^{\alpha} \bigr]=E \biggl[P+v \biggl(u_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr) \biggr]. $$
(3.3)
Using the property of the Elzaki transform and the initial condition, we get
$$ E \bigl[u(r,t) \bigr]=s^{2}f(r)+s^{\alpha}E \biggl[P+v \biggl(u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr) \biggr]. $$
(3.4)
Applying the inverse Elzaki operator on both sides of (3.4), we obtain
$$ u(r,t)=E^{-1} \bigl[s^{2}f(r) \bigr]+E^{-1} \biggl[s^{\alpha}E \biggl[P+v \biggl(u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr) \biggr] \biggr]. $$
(3.5)
Assume
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} g(r,t)=E^{-1}[s^{2}f(r)],\\ N(u(r,t))=E^{-1}[s^{\alpha}E[P+v(u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r})]]. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.6)
We can obtain
$$ u(r,t)=g(r,t)+N \bigl(u(r,t) \bigr). $$
(3.7)
The solution of equation (3.7) has the series form
$$ u(r,t)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i}(r,t). $$
(3.8)
The operator N can be decomposed as
$$ N \Biggl(\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i} \Biggr)=N(u_{0})+\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \Biggl\{ N \Biggl(\sum_{j=0}^{i}u_{j} \Biggr)-N \Biggl(\sum_{j=0}^{i-1}u_{j} \Biggr) \Biggr\} . $$
(3.9)
According to equations (3.8) and (3.9), equation (3.7) is equivalent to
$$ \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i}=g+N(u_{0})+ \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \Biggl\{ N \Biggl(\sum _{j=0}^{i}u_{j} \Biggr)-N \Biggl( \sum_{j=0}^{i-1}u_{j} \Biggr) \Biggr\} . $$
(3.10)
We define the recurrence relation
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{0}=g,\\ u_{1}=N(u_{0}),\\ u_{m+1}=N(u_{0}+u_{1}+\cdots+u_{m})-N(u_{0}+u_{1}+\cdots+u_{m-1}), \quad m=1,2,3,\ldots. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.11)
Then
$$ (u_{1}+u_{2}+\cdots+u_{m+1})=N(u_{0}+u_{1}+ \cdots+u_{m}),\quad m=1,2,3,\ldots, $$
(3.12)
and
$$ \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i}=g+N \Biggl( \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i} \Biggr). $$
(3.13)
The k-term approximate solution of equation (3.7) is given by \(u=u_{0}+u_{1}+u_{2}+\cdots+u_{k-1}\).

Similarly, for the proof of the convergence of the NIETM, see [19].

4 Modified reduced differential transform method (MRDTM)

In this section, the basic definition of the modified reduced differential transform method is introduced as in [31, 32].

Definition 4.1

The modified reduced differential transform of \(u(x,t)\) at \(t=t_{0}\) is represented as
$$ U_{k}(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(k\alpha+1)} \biggl[ \frac{\partial^{k}}{\partial {t}^{k}}u(x,t) \biggr]_{t=t_{0}}, $$
(4.1)
where α is a parameter which describes the order of the time-fractional derivative.

Definition 4.2

The differential inverse transform of \(U_{k}(x,t)\) is represented as
$$ u(x,t)=\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}U_{k}(x) (t-t_{0})^{k\alpha} =\sum^{\infty}_{k=0} \frac{1}{\Gamma(k\alpha+1)} \biggl[\frac{\partial ^{k}}{\partial{t}^{k}}u(x,t) \biggr]_{t=t_{0}}t^{k\alpha}. $$
(4.2)

According to (4.1) and (4.2), the following theorems can be obtained.

Theorem 4.1

If \(w(x,t)=u(x,t)\pm{v(x,t)}\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=U_{k}(x)\pm{V_{k}(x)}\).

Theorem 4.2

If \(w(x,t)=\lambda{u(x,t)}\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=\lambda{U_{k}(x)}\).

Theorem 4.3

If \(w(x,t)=x^{m}t^{n}\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=x^{m}\delta(k-n)\), where
$$ \delta(k-n)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l@{\quad}l} 1,& k=n,\\ 0,& k\neq{n}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$

Theorem 4.4

If \(w(x,t)=u(x,t)v(x,t)\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=\sum^{k}_{r=0}U_{r}(x)V_{k-r}(x)\).

Theorem 4.5

If \(w(x,t)=\frac{\partial^{r}}{\partial{t^{r}}}u(x,t)\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=\frac{(k+r)!}{k!}\frac{\partial^{r}}{\partial{t^{r}}}U_{k+r}(x)\).

Theorem 4.6

If \(w(x,t)=\frac{\partial^{N\alpha}}{\partial{t^{N\alpha}}}u(x,t)\), then \(MRDT[w(x,t)]=\frac{\Gamma(k\alpha+N\alpha+1)}{\Gamma(k\alpha +1)}U_{k+N}(x)\).

Theorem 4.7

If \(w(x,t)=[u(x,t)]^{k}\), then
$$ MRDT \bigl[w(x,t \bigr]=W_{k}(x)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l@{\quad}l} U_{0}(x),& k=0,\\ \sum^{k}_{n=1}\frac{(m+1)n-k}{kU_{0}(x)}U_{n}(x)W_{k-n}(x),& k\geq1. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
Applying the modified reduced differential transform on both sides of equation (3.2), we have
$$ MRDT \bigl[u_{t}^{\alpha} \bigr]=MRDT[P]+MRDT \bigl[v(u_{rr}) \bigr]+MRDT \biggl[v \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr) \biggr] \biggr]. $$
(4.3)
Using the property of MRDT, we can obtain
$$ \frac{\Gamma(k\alpha+\alpha+1)}{\Gamma(k\alpha +1)}U_{k+1}=v \biggl[(U_{k})_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}(U_{k})_{r} \biggr]+P\delta(k-0). $$
(4.4)
According to equation (4.4), we have the following result:
$$\begin{aligned} &U_{1}(x)=\varphi_{1}(x),\qquad U_{2}(x)= \varphi_{{2}}(x),\qquad U_{3}(x)=\varphi _{{3}}(x), \\ &U_{4}(x)=\varphi_{{4}}(x),\qquad\ldots. \end{aligned}$$
So, we get the solution of equation (3.2) as follows:
$$ u(x,t)=U_{0}(x)t^{0}+U_{1}(x)t^{\alpha}+U_{2}(x)t^{2\alpha }+U_{3}(x)t^{3\alpha}+ \cdots+U_{n}(x)t^{n\alpha}+\cdots. $$
(4.5)

5 Illustrative examples

Example 1

Consider the following time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{t}^{\alpha}(r,t)=P+u_{rr}(r,t)+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}(r,t),\\ u(r,0)=1-r^{2}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(5.1)

5.1 Applying the NIETM

Applying the Elzaki transform on both sides of equation (5.1), we have
$$ E \bigl[u(r,t) \bigr]=s^{2}f(r)+s^{\alpha}E \biggl[P+u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr]. $$
(5.2)
Using the inverse Elzaki transform and the initial condition on both sides of equation (5.2), we get
$$ u(r,t)=E^{-1} \bigl[s^{2} \bigl(1-r^{2} \bigr) \bigr]+E^{-1} \biggl[s^{\alpha}E \biggl[P+u_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr] \biggr]. $$
(5.3)
Assume
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} g(r,t)=E^{-1}[s^{2}(1-r^{2})],\\ N(u(r,t))=E^{-1}[s^{\alpha}E[P+u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}]]. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(5.4)
According to (3.11), we get the following results:
$$\begin{aligned} &u_{0}=1-r^{2}, \\ &u_{1}=\frac{(P-4)t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{2}=0, \\ &u_{3}=0, \\ &\cdots \\ &u_{n}=0. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, the solution of equation (5.1) is
$$\begin{aligned} u(r,t)&=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}u_{i} \\ &=1-r^{2}+\frac{(P-4)t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(5.5)

Remark 5.1

The result is the same as ADM, HPTM, HPM, and VIM by Momani and Odibat [15], Kumar et al. [16, 17], and Khan [18].

Remark 5.2

When \(\alpha=1\), equation (5.5) is the exact solution of the classical Navier-Stokes equation as follows:
$$ u(r,t)= \bigl(1-r^{2} \bigr)+(P-4)t. $$

5.2 Applying the MRDTM

Applying the MRDT on both sides of equation (5.1), we get
$$ MRDT \bigl[u_{t}^{\alpha}(r,t) \bigr]=MRDT[P]+MRDT \bigl[u_{tt}(r,t) \bigr]+MRDT \biggl[\frac{1}{r}u_{r}(r,t) \biggr]. $$
(5.6)
Using the property of MRDT, we have
$$ \frac{\Gamma(k\alpha+\alpha+1)}{\Gamma(k\alpha +1)}U_{k+1}=(U_{k})_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}(U_{k})_{r}+P\delta(k-0). $$
(5.7)
By iteration with \(U_{0}=1-r^{2}\), we get the result
$$\begin{aligned} &U_{0}=1-r^{2}, \\ &U_{1}=\frac{(P-4)}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}, \\ &U_{2}=0, \\ &U_{3}=0, \\ &\cdots \\ &U_{n}=0. \end{aligned}$$
So, the solution of equation (5.1) is given as
$$\begin{aligned} u(r,t)&=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}U_{n}t^{n\alpha} \\ &=1-r^{2}+\frac{(P-4)t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(5.8)

Example 2

We consider the following time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} u_{t}^{\alpha}(r,t)=u_{rr}(r,t)+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}(r,t),\quad 0< \alpha\leq1,\\ u(r,0)=r. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(5.9)

5.3 Applying the NIETM

Applying the Elzaki transform on both sides of equation (5.9), we have
$$ E \bigl[u(r,t) \bigr]-s^{2}u(r,0)-s^{\alpha}E \biggl[u_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr]=0. $$
(5.10)
According to the initial condition, we can obtain
$$ E \bigl[u(r,t) \bigr]-s^{2}r-s^{\alpha}E \biggl[u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr]=0. $$
(5.11)
Using the inverse Elzaki operator on both sides of equation (5.11), we have
$$ u(r,t)=E^{-1} \bigl[s^{2}r \bigr]+E^{-1} \biggl[s^{\alpha}E \biggl[u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r} \biggr] \biggr]. $$
(5.12)
Assume
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} g(r,t)=E^{-1}[s^{2}r],\\ N(u(r,t))=E^{-1}[s^{\alpha}E[u_{rr}+\frac{1}{r}u_{r}]]. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(5.13)
According to (3.11), we have the result
$$\begin{aligned} &u_{0}=r, \\ &u_{1}=\frac{t^{\alpha}}{r\Gamma(\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{2}=\frac{t^{2\alpha}}{r^{3}\Gamma(2\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{3}=\frac{9t^{3\alpha}}{r^{5}\Gamma(3\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{4}=\frac{225t^{4\alpha}}{r^{7}\Gamma(4\alpha+1)}, \\ &\cdots \\ &u_{n}=\frac{1^{2}\times3^{2}\times\cdots\times(2n-3)^{2}}{r^{2n-1}}\frac {t^{n\alpha}}{\Gamma(n\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, the solution of equation (5.9) is given as
$$ u(r,t)=r+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1^{2}\times3^{2}\times\cdots\times (2n-3)^{2}}{r^{2n-1}} \frac{t^{n\alpha}}{\Gamma(n\alpha+1)}. $$
(5.14)

Remark 5.3

The result is the same as ADM, HPTM, HPM, and VIM by Momani and Odibat [15], Kumar et al. [16, 17], and Khan [18].

Remark 5.4

When \(\alpha=1\), equation (5.14) is the same as the exact solution of the classical Navier-Stokes equation [15],
$$ u(r,t)=r+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1^{2}\times3^{2}\times\cdots\times (2n-3)^{2}}{r^{2n-1}} \frac{t^{n}}{n!}. $$

5.4 Applying the MRDTM

Applying the MRDT on both sides of equation (5.9), we get
$$ MRDT \bigl[u_{t}^{\alpha}(r,t) \bigr]=MRDT \bigl[u_{rr}(r,t) \bigr]+MRDT \biggl[\frac{1}{r}u_{r}(r,t) \biggr]. $$
(5.15)
Applying the property of MRDT, we get
$$ \frac{\Gamma(k\alpha+\alpha+1)}{\Gamma(k\alpha +1)}U_{k+1}=(U_{k})_{rr}+ \frac{1}{r}(U_{k})_{r}. $$
(5.16)
Using \(U_{0}=r\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} &u_{0}=r, \\ &u_{1}=\frac{1}{r\Gamma(\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{2}=\frac{1}{r^{3}\Gamma(2\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{3}=\frac{9}{r^{5}\Gamma(3\alpha+1)}, \\ &u_{4}=\frac{225}{r^{7}\Gamma(4\alpha+1)}, \\ &\cdots \\ &u_{n}=\frac{1^{2}\times3^{2}\times\cdots\times(2n-3)^{2}}{r^{2n-1}}\frac {1}{\Gamma(n\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
So, the solution of equation (5.9) is given as
$$\begin{aligned} u(r,t)&=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}U_{n}t^{n\alpha} =r+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1^{2}\times3^{2}\times\cdots\times (2n-3)^{2}}{r^{2n-1}} \frac{t^{n\alpha}}{\Gamma(n\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(5.17)

Remark 5.5

We apply the NIETM and MRDTM to solve the time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations, and we get complete agreement with HPM, HPTM, ADM, and VIM. By comparing, NIETM and MRDTM are more easy to understand and implement than other methods with less computation.

Remark 5.6

Figures 1-3, respectively, show the approximate solution of equation (5.1) for \(\alpha=0.5,0.7,1\) at \(P=5\). Figure 4 shows the exact solution of equation (5.1) for \(\alpha=1\). Figure 5 shows the different solution of equation (5.1) for \(\alpha =0.6,0.8,1\) at \(P=5\), \(r=2\). Figure 6 shows the different solution of equation (5.1) for \(\alpha=0.6,0.8,1\) at \(P=5\), \(t=1\). By comparison, it is easy for us to find that the solution continuously depends on the values of the time-fractional derivative.
Figure 1

The solution of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=0.5}\) , \(\pmb{P=5}\) .

Figure 2

The solution of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=0.7}\) , \(\pmb{P=5}\) .

Figure 3

The solution of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=1}\) , \(\pmb{P=5}\) .

Figure 4

The exact solution of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=1}\) , \(\pmb{P=5}\) .

Figure 5

The different solutions of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=0.6,0.8,1}\) at \(\pmb{P=5}\) , \(\pmb{r=2}\) . Solid line: \(\alpha=0.6\), dotted line: \(\alpha=0.8\), dashed line: \(\alpha=1\).

Figure 6

The different solutions of equation ( 5.1 ) for \(\pmb{\alpha=0.6,0.8,1}\) at \(\pmb{P=5}\) , \(\pmb{t=1}\) . Solid line: \(\alpha=0.6\), dotted line: \(\alpha=0.8\), dashed line: \(\alpha=1\).

6 Conclusion

In this paper, we apply the modified reduced differential transform method and new iterative Elzaki transform method for solving the time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation. The numerical results show that the MRDTM and NIETM are very powerful and efficient techniques for fractional differential equations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the editor and referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 61373174).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematics and Statistics, XiDian University

References

  1. Oldham, KB, Spanier, J: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York (1974) MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Kilbas, AA, Samko, SG, Marichev, OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, New York (1993) MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Hilfer, R: Application of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (2000) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller, KS, Ross, B: An Introduction to the Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Application. Wiley, New York (1993) Google Scholar
  5. Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Wazwaz, AM: A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 102, 77-86 (1999) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Adomian, G: A review of the decomposition method in applied mathematics. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 135, 44-501 (1988) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. He, JH: Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 178(3), 257-262 (1999) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. He, JH: A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for nonlinear problems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 35, 37-43 (2000) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. He, JH: Application of homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear wave equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 26, 695-700 (2005) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganji, DD, Sadighi, A: Application of homotopy perturbation and variational iteration methods to nonlinear heat transfer and porous media equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 207(1), 699-708 (2007) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang, XJ, Srivastava, HM, et al.: Local fractional homotopy perturbation method for solving fractal partial differential equation. Rom. Rep. Phys. 67, 752-761 (2015) Google Scholar
  13. Safari, M, Ganji, DD, Moslemi, M: Application of He’s variational iteration method and Adomian’s decomposition method to the fractional KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 2091-2097 (2009) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. He, JH: A short remark on fractional variational iteration method. Phys. Lett. A 375, 3362-3364 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Momani, S, Odibat, Z: Analytical solution of a time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by Adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 177, 488-494 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar, D, Singh, J, Kumar, S: A fractional model of Navier-Stokes equation arising in unsteady flow of a viscous fluid. J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 17, 14-19 (2015) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar, D, Kumar, S, Abbasbandy, S, Rashidi, MM: Analytical solution of fractional Navier-Stokes equation by using modified Laplace decomposition method. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5, 569-574 (2014) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan, NA: Analytical study of Navier-Stokes equation with fractional orders using He’s homotopy perturbation and variational iteration methods. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 10(9), 1127-1134 (2009) Google Scholar
  19. Daftardar-Gejji, V, Jafari, H: An iterative method for solving nonlinear functional equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 316, 753-763 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Keskin, Y, Oturanc, G: The reduced differential transform method for partial differential equations. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 10(6), 741-749 (2009) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Keskin, Y, Oturanc, G: The reduced differential transform method for solving linear and nonlinear wave equations. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. 34(2), 113-122 (2010) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar, S, Yildirim, A, Khan, Y, Wei, L: A fractional model of the diffusion equation and its analytical solution using Laplace transform. Sci. Iran. 19(4), 1117-1123 (2012) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan, M, Gondal, MA, Kumar, S: A new analytical procedure for nonlinear integral equation. Math. Comput. Model. 55, 1892-1897 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Wazwaz, AM: The combined Laplace transform-Adomian decomposition method for handling nonlinear Volterra integro-differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 216(4), 1304-1309 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan, Y, Faraz, N, Kumar, S, Yildirim, A: A coupling method of homotopy perturbation and Laplace transform for fractional models. Sci. Bull. ‘Politeh.’ Univ. Buchar., Ser. A, Appl. Math. Phys. 1, 57-68 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Gondal, MA, Khan, M: Homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear exponential boundary Layer equation using Laplace transformation. He’s polynomials and Pade technology He’s polynomials and Pade technology. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 11(12), 1145-1153 (2010) Google Scholar
  27. Madani, M, Fathizadeh, M, Khan, Y, Yildirim, A: On the coupling of the homotopy perturbation method and Laplace transformation. Math. Comput. Model. 53, 1937-1945 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, S: A new analytical modelling for fractional telegraph equation via Laplace transform. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 3154-3163 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Elzaki, TM, Elzaki, SM: On the connections between Laplace and Elzaki transform. Adv. Theor. Appl. Math. 6(1), 1-10 (2011) MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Khalid, M, Sultana, M, Zaidi, F, Arshad, U: Application of Elzaki transform method on some fractional differential equation. Math. Theory Model. 5(1), 89-96 (2015) Google Scholar
  31. Srivastava, V, Awasthi, MK, Tamsir, M: RDTM solution of Caputo time fractional-order hyperbolic telegraph equation. AIP Adv. 3(3), 032142 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Keskin, Y, Oturanc, G: Reduced differential transform method for fractional partial differential equations. Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A, Math. Phys. Mech. 1(2), 61-72 (2010) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang and Liu 2016