Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Solutions with Wright functions for time fractional convection flow near a heated vertical plate

Abstract

We investigate the unsteady flow of a viscous fluid near a vertical heated plate. The momentum and energy equations are considered as fractional differential equations with respect to the time t. Solutions of the initial-boundary values problem are determined by means of the Laplace transform technique and are represented by means of the Wright functions. The fundamental solution for the temperature field is obtained. This allows obtaining the temperature field for different conditions on the wall temperature. A numerical case is analyzed in order to obtain information regarding the influence of the fractional parameters on the temperature and velocity fields. Some physical aspects of the fluid behavior are presented by graphical illustrations.

1 Introduction

Fluid convection at vertical plates, resulting from buoyancy forces, has found applications in several industrial and technological fields such as heat exchangers, electronic cooling equipments, aeronautics, and nuclear reactors. Free convection flow occurs not only due to temperature difference, but also due to concentration difference or combination of these two. Many transport processes exist in nature and in industrial applications, in which the simultaneous heat and mass transfer occur as a result of combined buoyancy effects and diffusion of chemical species.

The flows of free convection are common in environmental heat transfer processes. As a result, many investigations have been made by considering a wide range of mechanical and thermal boundary conditions [1]. Using the Laplace transform technique, Soundalgekar [2] has obtained an exact solution to the flow of a viscous fluid past an impulsively started semiinfinite isothermal vertical plate. Effects of heating or cooling of the plate on the flow field were analyzed through Grashof number. Transient free convection flow past an infinite vertical plate has been studied by Ingham [3]. Merkin [4] gave the similarity solutions for the same problem. Seth and Ansari [5] analyzed the natural convection flows past an impulsively moving vertical plate with ramped wall temperature in the presence of thermal diffusion with heat absorption. Narahari and Nayan [6] studied the free convection flow past an impulsively started vertical plate with Newtonian heating in the presence of thermal radiation and mass diffusion. The problem of free convection under the influence of a magnetic field has attracted the interest of researchers in view of its applications in geophysics, astrophysics, petroleum industries, and cooling of nuclear reactors. Georgantopoulos et al. [7] studied the magnetohydrodynamic free convection flow past an impulsively started vertical plate with constant temperature. Raptis and Singh [8] have studied the effect of a uniform transverse magnetic field on the free convection flow of an electrically conducting fluid past an accelerated vertical plate. Tokis [9] have obtained a class of exact solutions of the unsteady free convection flow of an electrically conducting fluid near a moving infinite vertical plate in the presence of uniform transverse magnetic field fixed to the fluid or to the plate. Narahari and Debnath [10] studied the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic free convection flow past an accelerated vertical plate with constant heat flux and heat generation or absorption. Toki and Tokis [11] obtained an elegant exact solution for the unsteady free convection flows on a porous plate with time-dependent heating. In last time, the fractional calculus has become an interesting mathematical method for solution of diverse problems in mathematics, science, and engineering [1214]. Fractional calculus involves the computation of integrals or derivatives of any real order. This calculus has applications in study of the heat flux, temperature and entropy generation, diffusion phenomena, modeling control systems, viscoelasticity, biology, etc. The advantage of the fractional derivatives in theory of viscoelasticity is that it affords possibilities for obtaining constitutive equations for elastic complex modulus of viscoelastic materials with only few experimentally determined parameters [15]. Debnath [16] obtained solutions for the Stokes and Rayleigh problems for a viscous fluid with time-fractional derivatives. For the same model of fluid, the unsteady Couette flow was analyzed. The well-known time-fractional diffusion equations have been treated in different contexts by many authors [1720]. Other studies regarding the flow of complex fluids whose governing equations contain time-fractional derivatives can be found in [2126].

In this paper we investigate the unsteady free convection flow of a Newtonian fluid near a vertical heated plate in the case of the time-fractional derivatives models. Solutions of the temperature and velocity fields are obtained, in the case of the oscillating motion of the vertical plate, by means of the Laplace transform technique. By using the Wright functions and the generalized G-Lorenzo-Hartley functions elegant closed forms for temperature and fluid velocity were obtained. The fundamental solution corresponding to the temperature is also obtained. This allows obtaining the temperature field for different conditions on the wall temperature. Some numerical examples were analyzed. To check the accuracy of the obtained results, we have used the Stehfest algorithm to the inverse Laplace transform [27]. The values found with the analytical solutions and with the Stehfest algorithm are in good agreement. Also, the influence of the fractional parameters on the temperature and velocity is studied.

2 Statement of the problem

Let us consider the unsteady free convection flow of an incompressible viscous fluid with time-fractional derivatives, in the vicinity of an infinite vertical wall with time-dependent temperature. Initially, the wall and the fluid are at rest at the constant temperature \(T_{\infty}\). The wall is situated in the \((x,z)\)-plane of a Cartesian coordinate system \(Oxyz\), the x-axis being the ascendant vertical. After time \(t = 0^{ +}\), the plate has a translational motion along the vertical axis with the velocity \(u_{w}(t) = U_{0}\sin(wt)\), and the plate temperature changes according with the ramp-type function \(T_{w}(t) = T_{\infty} + T_{0}(t/t_{0})\). The flow is considered to be laminar without any pressure gradient in the flow direction. Because the plate is infinite in x- and z-directions, all physical quantities, except possibly the pressure, are functions of y and t only. Assuming that the convective effects and viscous dissipation are negligible and using the boundary layer and Bussinesq approximations, the governing equations for such flows are [4, 16, 17]

$$\begin{aligned}& {}^{c}D_{t}^{\alpha} u(y,t) = \nu_{\alpha} \frac{\partial^{2}u(y,t)}{\partial y^{2}} + g\beta {}_{\alpha} \bigl[T(y,t) - T_{\infty} \bigr],\quad y, t > 0, \alpha \in (0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(1)
$$\begin{aligned}& {}^{c}D_{t}^{\gamma} T(y,t) = k_{\gamma} \frac{\partial^{2}T(y,t)}{\partial y^{2}}, \quad y, t > 0, \gamma \in (0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(2)

where

$$ {}^{c}D_{t}^{\alpha} f(y,t) = \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{\Gamma (1 - \alpha )}\int_{0}^{t} (t - \tau )^{ - \alpha} \frac{\partial f(y,\tau )}{\partial \tau}\,d\tau,& \alpha \in (0,1), \\ \frac{\partial f(y,t)}{\partial t},& \alpha = 1, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3)

is the time-fractional derivative in the Caputo sense [12, 28]. In the above equations, \(u(y,t)\) is the fluid velocity along the x-axis, \(T(y,t)\) is the temperature field, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and \(\nu_{\alpha} [m^{2} / s^{\alpha} ]\), \(\beta_{\alpha} [s^{1 - \alpha} / K]\), and \(k_{\gamma} [m^{2} / s^{\gamma} ]\) are the coefficients of the material. Obviously, for \(\alpha = \gamma = 1\), these coefficients become the kinematic viscosity \(\nu_{1} = \nu\), the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion \(\beta_{1} = \beta\), and \(k_{1} = k / \rho c_{p}\) (k is the thermal conductivity, ρ is the density, and \(c_{p}\) is the specific heat), corresponding to an ordinary viscous fluid.

We consider the following initial and boundary conditions:

$$\begin{aligned}& u(y,0) = 0,\qquad T(y,0) = T_{\infty}, \quad y \ge 0, \end{aligned}$$
(4)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(0,t) = u_{w}(t) = U_{0}\sin (\omega t),\quad t \ge 0, U_{0} > 0, \end{aligned}$$
(5)
$$\begin{aligned}& T(0,t) = T_{\infty} + T_{0}(t/t_{0}),\quad t \ge 0, T_{0} \ne 0, \end{aligned}$$
(6)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(y,t) \to 0,\qquad T(y,t) \to T_{\infty}\quad \mbox{as }y \to \infty \end{aligned}$$
(7)

and the nondimensional

$$ t^{*} = \frac{t}{t_{0}},\qquad y^{*} = \frac{y}{\sqrt{\nu_{\alpha} t_{0}^{\alpha}}}, \qquad u^{*} = \frac{u}{U_{0}},\qquad T^{*} = \frac{T - T_{\infty}}{ T_{0}},\qquad\omega^{*} = \omega t_{0}, $$
(8)

with a characteristic time \(t_{0} > 0\). Dropping the star notation, we obtain the next dimensionless initial-boundary-value problem:

$$\begin{aligned}& {}^{c}D_{t}^{\alpha} u(y,t) = \frac{\partial^{2}u(y,t)}{\partial y^{2}} + G_{\alpha} T(y,t),\quad y,t > 0, \alpha \in (0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(9)
$$\begin{aligned}& {}^{c}D_{t}^{\gamma} T(y,t) = \frac{1}{P_{\alpha \gamma}} \frac{\partial^{2}T(y,t)}{\partial y^{2}},\quad y,t > 0, \gamma \in (0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(10)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(y,0) = 0,\qquad T(y,0) = 0,\quad y \ge 0, \end{aligned}$$
(11)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(0,t) = f(t) = \sin (\omega t),\qquad T(0,t) = h(t) = t,\quad t \ge 0, \end{aligned}$$
(12)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(y,t) \to 0,\qquad T(y,t) \to 0\quad \mbox{as }y \to \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(13)

where \(G_{\alpha} = \frac{1}{U_{0}}\beta_{\alpha} gt_{0}^{\alpha}\), and \(P_{\alpha \gamma} = \frac{\nu_{\alpha} t_{0}^{\alpha}}{k_{\gamma} t_{0}^{\gamma}}\) are the dimensionless constants.

For \(\alpha = \gamma = 1\), these coefficients are the Grashof and Prandtl numbers, respectively.

3 Solution of the problem

In order to determine solutions of the initial-boundary-value problem (9)-(13), we use the Laplace transform with respect to variable t [29]. The transform domain problem is given by

$$\begin{aligned}& s^{\alpha} \bar{u}(y,s) = \frac{\partial^{2}\bar{u}(y,s)}{\partial y^{2}} + G_{\alpha} \bar{T}(y,s), \end{aligned}$$
(14)
$$\begin{aligned}& P_{\alpha \gamma} s^{\gamma} \bar{T}(y,s) = \frac{\partial^{2}\bar{T}(y,s)}{\partial y^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$
(15)
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{u}(0,s) = \bar{f}(s) = \frac{\omega}{s^{2} + \omega^{2}},\qquad \bar{T}(0,s) = \bar{h}(s) = \frac{1}{s^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$
(16)
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{u}(y,s) \to 0,\qquad \bar{T}(y,s) \to 0\quad \mbox{as }y \to \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(17)

where \(\bar{u}(y,s)\), \(\bar{T}(y,s)\), \(\bar{f}(s)\), and \(\bar{h}(s)\) are the Laplace transforms of the functions \(u(y,t)\), \(T(y,t)\), \(f(t)\), and \(h(t)\), respectively.

3.1 Temperature field

The solution of problem (15), (16)2, and (17)2 is given by

$$ \bar{T}(y,s) = s^{ - 2}\exp \bigl( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2}\bigr). $$
(18)

Using the formula [30]

$$ L^{ - 1} \bigl\{ s^{ - \beta} \exp \bigl( - as^{\sigma} \bigr) \bigr\} = t^{\beta - 1}\Phi \bigl(\beta, - \sigma; - at^{ - \sigma} \bigr), \quad a,\beta \ge 0, 0 < \sigma < 1, $$
(19)

we obtain the next \((y,t)\)-solution for the temperature:

$$ T(y,t) = t\Phi \biggl(2, - \frac{\gamma}{2}; - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\biggr), $$
(20)

where

$$ \Phi (a, - b;z) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{n}}{n!\Gamma (a - bn)},\quad 0 < b < 1, $$
(21)

is the Whright function [30, 31].

Function (20) satisfies the initial condition (11) and the natural condition (13) at infinity. Also, the boundary condition (12) is satisfied. Indeed, we have

$$\lim_{y \to 0^{ +}} t \Phi \biggl(2, - \frac{\gamma}{2}; - y \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\biggr) = L^{ - 1} \Bigl\{ \lim _{y \to 0^{ +}} s^{ - 2}\exp \bigl( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2}\bigr) \Bigr\} = L^{ - 1}\bigl\{ s^{ - 2}\bigr\} = h(t). $$

3.1.1 Fundamental solution

The expression of the temperature field was determined by the Laplace transform technique. It is useful, however, to determine the fundamental solution \(G_{T}(y,t)\) for the temperature field, namely, solution corresponding to the problem (10), the second condition (11), and the second condition (13), with the Dirichlet boundary condition \(T(0,t) = \delta (t)\), \(\delta (t)\) being the Dirac distribution.

Using the Laplace transform with respect to time t and the Fourier sine transform with respect to the space coordinate x, we obtained the following equivalent forms of the fundamental solution \(G_{T}(y,t)\) for the temperature field:

$$\begin{aligned} G_{T}(y,t) &= t^{ - 1}\Phi \bigl(0, - \gamma /2; - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\bigr) \\ &= \frac{1}{2}\gamma y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - 1 - \gamma /2}M_{\gamma /2}\bigl(y \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\bigr) \\ & = \frac{2t^{\gamma - 1}}{\pi P_{\alpha \gamma}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \xi \sin (y\xi )E_{\gamma,\gamma} \bigl( - P_{\alpha \gamma}^{ - 1}\xi^{2}t^{\gamma} \bigr)\,d\xi, \quad y,t > 0, G_{T}(0,t) = \delta (t), \end{aligned}$$
(22)

where \(M_{\alpha} (z)\) is the auxiliary Wright-type function, introduced by Mainardi et al. [32] and \(E_{\alpha,\beta} (z)\), defined as \(t^{\beta - 1}E_{\alpha,\beta} ( - bt^{\alpha} ) = L^{ - 1} ( \frac{s^{\alpha - \beta}}{s^{\alpha} + b} )\), is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function [33]. Now, by means of the fundamental solution, we find the temperature field corresponding to several boundary condition \(T(0,t) = h(t)\). Indeed, it is easy to see that the function \(T(y,t) = h(t) * G_{T}(y,t) = \int_{0}^{t} h(\tau )G_{T}(y,t - \tau )\,d\tau\) is a solution of problem (10), and the second condition from equations (11), (12), (13). In the problem studied in this work, we have

$$\begin{aligned} T(y,t) &= h(t) * G_{T}(y,t) \\ & = L^{ - 1} \bigl[ \bar{h}(s)G_{T}(y,s) \bigr] \\ &= L^{ - 1} \bigl[ s^{ - 2}\exp \bigl( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2}\bigr) \bigr] \\ &= t\Phi \bigl(2, - \gamma /2; - y \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2}\bigr), \end{aligned}$$
(23)

and we recover Eq. (20).

3.1.2 The Nusselt number

As a measure of the heat transfer rate at the plate, the Nuselt number is given by

$$\begin{aligned} Nu &= - \frac{\partial T(y,t)}{\partial y} \bigg| _{y = 0} = \lim _{y \to 0^{ +}} \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{(2 - \gamma /2) - 1}\Phi \bigl(2 - \gamma /2, - \gamma /2; - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\bigr) \\ &= \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} L^{ - 1} \Bigl\{ \lim_{y \to 0^{ +}} s^{ - (2 - \gamma /2)}\exp \bigl( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2}\bigr) \Bigr\} \\ &= \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} L^{ - 1} \bigl\{ s^{ - (2 - \gamma /2)} \bigr\} \\ &= \frac{\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{1 - \gamma /2}}{\Gamma (2 - \gamma /2)}. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

3.1.3 Particular case \(\gamma = 1\)

For comparison between ordinary model and the fractional models, it is important to present solutions corresponding to the case \(\gamma = 1\). In this particular case, the fundamental solution becomes

$$ G_{T}(y,t) = \frac{y\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}}}{2t\sqrt{t}} M_{1/2}\bigl(y \sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}} t^{ - 1/2}\bigr). $$
(25)

By using the formula \(M_{1/2}(z) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \exp ( \frac{ - z^{2}}{4} )\) [34] we obtain the known expression of the fundamental solution

$$ G_{T}(y,t) = \frac{y\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}}}{2t\sqrt{\pi t}} \exp \biggl( \frac{ - y^{2}P_{\alpha 1}}{4t} \biggr). $$
(26)

The temperature field is given by the convolution

$$ T(y,t) = \frac{y\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}}}{2\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{0}^{t} \frac{t - \tau}{\tau \sqrt{\tau}} \exp \biggl( \frac{ - y^{2}P_{\alpha 1}}{4\tau} \biggr)\,d\tau, $$
(27)

which can be written in the elegant form (see [11], Appendix B)

$$ T(y,t) = \biggl( t + \frac{y^{2}P_{\alpha 1}}{2} \biggr)\operatorname{erfc} \biggl( \frac{y\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}}}{2\sqrt{t}} \biggr) - \frac{y\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}}}{2\sqrt{\pi}} \exp \biggl( \frac{ - y^{2}P_{\alpha 1}}{4\tau} \biggr), $$
(28)

where \(\operatorname{erfc}(\cdot)\) is the complementary error function.

The Nusselt number is obtained from Eq. (24) making \(\gamma = 1\):

$$ Nu = \frac{\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}t}}{\Gamma (3/2)} = \frac{2\sqrt{P_{\alpha 1}t}}{\sqrt{\pi}}. $$
(29)

3.2 Velocity field

Using the expression of Laplace transform of the temperature, given by Eq. (18), we obtain a solution of the set of Eqs. (14), (16), and (17) in the form

$$\begin{aligned} \bar{u}(y,s) &= \bar{f}(s)\exp \bigl( - ys^{\alpha /2} \bigr) - \frac{G_{\alpha} [ \exp ( - ys^{\alpha /2} ) - \exp ( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2} ) ]}{s^{2}(s^{\alpha} - P_{\alpha \gamma} s^{\gamma} )} \\ &= \bar{f}(s)\exp \bigl( - ys^{\alpha /2} \bigr) + \frac{G_{\alpha} s^{ - \gamma - 1}}{s^{\alpha - \gamma} - P_{\alpha \gamma}} \frac{\exp ( - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} s^{\gamma /2} ) - \exp ( - ys^{\alpha /2} )}{s}. \end{aligned}$$
(30)

Applying the inverse Laplace transform, the \((y,t)\)-domain velocity is given by

$$\begin{aligned} u(y,t) ={}& f(t) * \bigl[t^{ - 1}\Phi \bigl(0, - \alpha /2; - yt^{ - \alpha /2}\bigr)\bigr] \\ &{}+ G_{\alpha} G_{\alpha - \gamma, - \gamma - 1,1}(P_{\alpha \gamma},t) * \bigl[ \Phi \bigl(1, - \gamma /2; - y\sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} t^{ - \gamma /2}\bigr) \\ &{}- \Phi \bigl(1, - \alpha /2; - yt^{ - \alpha /2}\bigr) \bigr], \end{aligned}$$
(31)

where

$$\begin{aligned} &G_{a,b,c}(d,t) = L^{ - 1} \biggl\{ \frac{s^{b}}{(s^{a} - d)^{c}} \biggr\} = \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty} \frac{d^{j}\Gamma (c + j)}{\Gamma (c)\Gamma (j + 1)}\frac{t^{(c + j)a - b - 1}}{\Gamma [(c + j)a - b]}, \\ &\operatorname{Re} (ac - b) > 0, \operatorname{Re}(s) > 0, \bigl\vert s^{a} \bigr\vert > \vert d \vert , \end{aligned}$$
(32)

is the generalized G-function introduced by Lorenzo and Hartley [34], and the symbol ‘’ represents the convolution product.

In the particular case \(\alpha = \gamma = 1\), Eq. (31) becomes

$$\begin{aligned} u(y,t) ={}& \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{y/(2\sqrt{t} )}^{\infty} f \biggl( t - \frac{y^{2}}{4x^{2}} \biggr) \exp \bigl( - x^{2}\bigr)\,dx \\ &{}+ \frac{G_{1}}{1 - P_{11}} \biggl[ \frac{12t^{2} - 5P_{11}^{2}y^{4}}{24}\operatorname{erfc} \biggl( \frac{y\sqrt{P_{11}}}{2\sqrt{t}} \biggr) + \frac{5y\sqrt{P_{11}t} (y^{2}P_{11} - 2t)}{12\sqrt{\pi}} \exp \biggl( \frac{ - y^{2}P_{11}}{4t} \biggr) \biggr] \\ &{}- \frac{G_{1}}{1 - P_{11}} \biggl[ \frac{12t^{2} - 5y^{4}}{24}\operatorname{erfc} \biggl( \frac{y}{2\sqrt{t}} \biggr) + \frac{5y\sqrt{t} (y^{2} - 2t)}{12\sqrt{\pi}} \exp \biggl( \frac{ - y^{2}}{4t} \biggr) \biggr], \\ &{} P_{11} \ne 1. \end{aligned}$$
(33)

3.2.1 Skin friction on the wall

Expression of the skin friction on the vertical plate in the x-direction is given by

$$\begin{aligned} C_{fx} ={}& \frac{\partial u(y,t)}{\partial y} \bigg| _{{y = 0}} = L^{ - 1} \biggl\{ \lim_{y \to 0^{ +}} \frac{\partial \bar{u}(y,s)}{\partial y} \biggr\} = L^{ - 1} \biggl\{ \frac{ - \omega s^{\alpha /2}}{s^{2} + \omega^{2}} \biggr\} \\ &{} + G_{\alpha} L^{ - 1} \biggl\{ \frac{s^{ - 2 - \gamma + \alpha /2}}{s^{\alpha - \gamma} - P_{\alpha \gamma}} - \sqrt{P_{\alpha \gamma}} \frac{s^{ - 2 - \gamma /2}}{s^{\alpha - \gamma} - P_{\alpha \gamma}} \biggr\} \\ ={}& {-} \omega G_{2,\alpha /2,1}\bigl( - \omega^{2},t\bigr) + G_{\alpha} \bigl[ G_{\alpha - \gamma,\alpha /2 - \gamma - 2,1}(P_{\alpha \gamma},t) - G_{\alpha - \gamma, - \gamma /2.1}(P_{\alpha \gamma},t) \bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
(34)

Inthecase\(\alpha = \gamma\) and \(P_{\alpha \gamma} \ne 1\),

$$\begin{aligned} C_{fx} &= L^{ - 1} \biggl\{ \frac{ - \omega s^{\alpha /2}}{s^{2} + \omega^{2}} + \frac{G_{\alpha}}{(1 + \sqrt{P_{\alpha \alpha}} )s^{2 + \alpha /2}} \biggr\} \\ &= - \omega G_{2,\alpha /2,1}\bigl( - \omega^{2},t\bigr) + \frac{G_{\alpha}}{ 1 + \sqrt{P_{\alpha \alpha}}} \frac{t^{1 + \alpha /2}}{\Gamma (2 + \alpha /2)}. \end{aligned}$$
(35)

4 Numerical results

To obtain some information on the fluids behavior, the authors analyzed some numerical examples using the coefficient values \(t_{0} = 10\), \(U_{0} = 0.1\), \(\beta_{\alpha} = 21 \times 10^{ - 5}\), \(k_{\gamma} = 0.613\), and \(\nu_{\alpha} = 1.792 \times 10^{ - 6}\). The numerical simulations were done using the subroutines of the software package Mathcad. For the temperature field, we have used the expressions given by the Eqs. (20) and (28), and for the velocity, expressions given by Eqs. (31) and (33). To check the accuracy of the obtained results, we have used the Stehfest algorithm [27] for calculating the inverse Laplace transform, namely:

$$ \begin{aligned} &T(y,t) = \frac{\ln 2}{t}\sum _{j = 1}^{2p} d_{j}\bar{T} \biggl( y,j \frac{\ln 2}{t} \biggr),\qquad u(y,t) = \frac{\ln 2}{t}\sum _{j = 1}^{2p} d_{j}\bar{u} \biggl( y,j \frac{\ln 2}{t} \biggr), \\ &d_{j} = ( - 1)^{j + p}\sum_{i = [ \frac{j + 1}{2} ]}^{\min (j,p)} \frac{i^{p}(2i)!}{(p - i)!i!(i - 1)!(j - i)!(2i - j)!}. \end{aligned} $$
(36)

Here \([r]\) denotes the integer part of a real number r, and p is a positive integer.

Tables 1 and 2 show that the numerical values obtained by the Eqs. (20) and the first formula (36) and by Eqs. (31) and the second formula (36), respectively, are in good agreement.

Table 1 Comparison of the temperature values at the time \(\pmb{t = 15}\) for \(\pmb{\alpha = 0.75}\)
Table 2 Comparison of the velocity values at the time \(\pmb{t = 2}\) , for \(\pmb{\alpha = 0.873}\) and \(\pmb{\gamma = 0.628}\)

In Figure 1 we plotted the curves corresponding to the temperature field \(T(y,t)\) versus the spatial coordinate y for \(t = 15\) and for various values of the fractional coefficients α and γ. It is important to point out that, in comparison with the ordinary case \(\alpha = \gamma =1\), the thermal boundary layer thickness is smaller for \(\alpha,\gamma \in (0,1)\). Also, for a fixed value of the fractional parameter α, the thickness of the thermal boundary layer is decreasing according to the fractional parameter γ. An opposite effect is observed if values of the parameter α are decreasing. In this case, the thermal boundary layer thickness is greater for lower values of the fractional parameter α. In Figures 2 and 3 we sketched the graphs of velocity \(u(y,t)\) versus y for two values of time t and for several values of the fractional parameters α and γ. From these figures we see that, for \(\alpha = \gamma =1\) (the ordinary case), the fluid flows are faster than in the cases modeled by the time-fractional derivatives. The velocity boundary layer thickness decreases for small values of fractional coefficient α. On the other hand, the thickness of the velocity boundary layer increases depending on the fractional parameter γ.

Figure 1
figure 1

Variations in temperature field. (a), (b), (c) represent the variation of the temperature \(T(y,t)\) for \(t = 15\) and various values of the fractional coefficients α and γ.

Figure 2
figure 2

Variations in velocity field for time \(\pmb{t=5}\) . (a), (b), (c) represents the variation of velocity \(u(y,t)\) for \(t = 5\), \(\omega = \pi/6\), and various values of the fractional parameters α and γ.

Figure 3
figure 3

Variations in velocity field for time \(\pmb{t=15}\) . (a), (b), (c) represents the variation of velocity \(u(y,t)\) for \(t = 15\), \(\omega = \pi/6\), and various values of the fractional coefficients α and γ.

5 Concluding remarks

In this paper we studied the unsteady free convection flow of a viscous fluid near a heated vertical plate. Both governing equations, the momentum equation and energy equation, are considered as time-fractional differential equations of order \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) and \(\gamma \in (0,1]\), respectively. Based on the Laplace transform technique and using the Wright functions and G-Lorenzo-Hartley functions, the closed forms of the temperature and velocity fields were determined. The fundamental solution corresponding to the temperature, the Nusselt number, and the friction coefficient on the wall are obtained. Some physical aspects of the fluid behavior were studied by numerical simulation and graphical illustrations. As a general result, it should be noted that for decreasing values of the fractional coefficient α, the fluid velocity and boundary layer thickness are decreasing. The fluid temperature decreases if the values of the fractional coefficient γ decreases and increases for decreasing values of α.

References

  1. Eskinazi, S: Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Our Environment. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soundalgekar, VM: Free convection effects on the Stokes problem for an infinite vertical plate. J. Heat Transf. 99, 499-501 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingham, DB: Transient free convection on an isothermal vertical flat plate. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 21, 67-69 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Merkin, JH: A note on the similarity solutions for free convection on a vertical plate. J. Eng. Math. 19, 189-201 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Seth, GS, Ansari, MdS: MHD natural convection flow past an impulsively moving vertical plate with ramped wall temperature in the presence of thermal diffusion with heat absorption. Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng. 15, 199-215 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Narahari, M, Nayan, MY: Free convection flow past an impulsively started infinite vertical plate with Newtonian heating in the presence of thermal radiation and mass diffusion. Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 35, 187-198 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Georgantopoulos, GA, Douskos, CN, Kafousias, NG, Goudas, CL: Hydromagnetic free convection effects on the Stokes problem for an infinite vertical plate. Lett. Heat Mass Transf. 6, 397-404 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raptis, A, Singh, AK: MHD free convection flow past an accelerated vertical plate. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 10, 313-321 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tokis, JN: A class of exact solutions of the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic free-convection flows. Astrophys. Space Sci. 112, 413-422 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Narahari, M, Debnath, L: Unsteady magnetohydrodynamic free convection flow past an accelerated vertical plate with constant heat flux and heat generation or absorption. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 93(1), 38-49 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Toki, CJ, Tokis, JN: Exact solutions for the unsteady free convection flows on a porous plate with time-dependent heating. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 87(1), 4-13 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Samko, SG, Kilbas, AA, Marichev, OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, New York (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Golmankhaneh, AK, Lambert, L: Investigations in Dynamics: With Focus on Fractional Dynamics. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soczkiewicz, E: Application of fractional calculus in the theory of viscoelasticity. Mol. Quantum Acoust. 23, 397-404 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Debnath, L: Fractional integral and fractional differential equations in fluid mechanics. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 6, 119-155 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mainardi, F, Pagnini, G: The Wright functions as solutions of the time-fractional diffusion equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 141, 51-62 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomovski, Z, Sandev, T, Metzler, R, Dubbeldam, J: Generalized space-time fractional diffusion equation with composite fractional time derivative. Physica A 391, 2527-2542 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatano, Y, Nakagawa, J, Wang, S, Yamamoto, M: Determination of order in fractional diffusion equation. J. Math-for-Ind. 5, 51-57 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Eidelman, SD, Kochubei, AN: Cauchy problem for fractional diffusion equations. J. Differ. Equ. 199, 211-255 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Siddique, I, Vieru, D: Exact solutions for rotational flow of a fractional Maxwell fluid in a circular cylinder. Therm. Sci. 16(2), 345-355 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vieru, D, Fetecau, C, Fetecau, C: Unsteady flow of a generalized Oldroyd-B fluid due to an infinite plate subject to a time-dependent shear stress. Can. J. Phys. 88(9), 675-687 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chunhong, W: Numerical solutions for Stokes’ first problem for a heated generalized second grade fluid with fractional derivative. Appl. Numer. Math. 59, 2571-2583 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan, WC, Pan, WX, Xu, MY: A note on unsteady flows of a viscoelastic fluid with the fractional Maxwell model between two parallel plates. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 38, 645-650 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarkar, N, Lahiri, A: Effect of fractional parameter on plane waves in a rotating elastic medium under fractional order generalized thermoelasticity. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 04, 1250030 (2012). doi:10.1142/S1758825112500305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhrawy, AH, Zaky, MA, Baleanu, D: New numerical approximations for space-time fractional Burgers’ equations via a Legendre spectral-collocation method. Rom. Rep. Phys. 67(2), 340-349 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stehfest, H: Algorithm 368: numerical inversion of Laplace transform. Commun. ACM 13(1), 47-49 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, KS, Ross, B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Debnath, L, Bhatta, D: Integral Transforms and Their Applications, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stanković, B: On the function of E. M. Wright. Publ. Inst. Math. (Belgr.) 10(24), 113-124 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gorenflo, R, Luchko, Y, Mainardi, F: Analytical properties and applications of Wright function. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2(4), 383-414 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mainardi, F, Mura, A, Pagnini, G: The M-Wright functions in time - fractional diffusion processes: a tutorial survey. Int. J. Differ. Equ. 2010, Article ID 104505 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Povstenko, YZ: Fundamental solutions to time-fractional advection diffusion equation in a case of two space variables. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, Article ID 705364 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Lorenzo, CF, Hartley, TT: Generalized functions for the fractional calculus. NASA/TP-1999-209424/REV1, 1-17 (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Attock Campus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohail Ahmad.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed equally to this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shakeel, A., Ahmad, S., Khan, H. et al. Solutions with Wright functions for time fractional convection flow near a heated vertical plate. Adv Differ Equ 2016, 51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0775-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0775-9

MSC

Keywords