- Research
- Open Access
Changing-periodic time scales and decomposition theorems of time scales with applications to functions with local almost periodicity and automorphy
- Chao Wang^{1} and
- Ravi P Agarwal^{2, 3}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0633-1
© Wang and Agarwal 2015
- Received: 2 June 2015
- Accepted: 3 September 2015
- Published: 17 September 2015
Abstract
In this work, we address the periodic coverage phenomenon on arbitrary unbounded time scales and initiate a new idea, namely, we introduce the concept of changing-periodic time scales. We discuss some properties of this new concept and illustrate several examples. Specially, we establish a basic decomposition theorem of time scales which provides bridges between periodic time scales and an arbitrary time scale with a bounded graininess function μ. Based on this result, we introduce local-almost periodic and local-almost automorphic functions on changing-periodic time scales and study some related properties. The concept of changing-periodic time scales introduced in this paper will help in understanding and removing the serious deficiency which arises in the study of classical functions on time scales.
Keywords
- changing-periodic time scales
- decomposition theorem of time scales
- periodic sub-timescale
- almost periodic functions
- almost automorphic functions
MSC
- 26E70
- 43A60
- 26E99
- 34N05
- 35B15
1 Introduction
With the development and deepening of the real analysis on time scales, many works related to time scales have appeared recently (see [1–11]). This has resulted in the study of dynamic equations on time scales becoming a leading topic of research. Specially, to study periodic solutions of dynamic equations on time scales, Kaufmann and Raffoul in 2006 (see [12]) introduced the concepts of periodic time scales and periodic functions. This was followed (see [13, 14]) by the definitions of almost periodic time scales and almost periodic functions to investigate almost periodic solutions of dynamic equations on time scales. We recall that a time scale is an irregular closed subset of \(\mathbb{R}\), and thus it creates several difficulties of keeping the closedness of variables of functions under translation; for example, for a given function \(f:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\), we cannot guarantee that there exists τ such that \(f(t+\tau)\) makes sense because we do not know whether \(t+\tau\in\mathbb{T}\). This is one of the main reasons mathematicians have introduced some suitable time scales such as periodic time scales and almost periodic time scales, and so on, before even they give the proper concepts of functions defined on time scales.
It is clear that periodic time scales are regular, so we can obtain some of their nice properties (such as the above closedness property), and introduce and study well-defined functions on them. However, most of time scales are not periodic; thus, it is necessary and meaningful to find an effective way to build bridges between periodic time scales and an arbitrary time scale. This will easily allow us to extract results known for periodic time scales to other types of time scales, and vice versa. Having this in mind, in this paper, we shall introduce a new concept, which we call ‘changing-periodic time scales’. This concept deals not only with almost periodic time scales, but also with all the time scales with the bounded graininess function μ. In conclusion, we shall show that all the time scales with a bounded graininess function μ can be decomposed into a countable union of periodic time scales, i.e., we shall formulate a basic decomposition theorem of time scales. This result paves a way to study functions on an arbitrary time scale with bounded μ as conveniently as on periodic time scales. Next, based on changing-periodic time scales, we shall introduce ‘local-almost periodic’ and ‘local-almost automorphic’ functions and study some of their related properties. Finally, we shall apply these results to address local-almost periodicity and local-almost automorphy of solutions of dynamic equations on arbitrary time scales with bounded graininess function μ.
The present paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we begin with necessary known definitions and results on time scales, and then we introduce some new concepts, which include changing-periodic time scales. Based on these concepts, we shall establish several new results. Our main result here is the decomposition theorem of time scales. In Section 3, as applications of changing-periodic time scales, first we shall introduce two new concepts - local-almost periodic and local-almost automorphic functions, and then we show that these concepts can be used as a powerful tool to investigate the local-almost periodicity and local-almost automorphy of solutions of dynamic equations on time scales.
2 Changing-periodic time scales
In the following, we introduce some basic knowledge of time scales and famous Zorn’s lemma which will be used in our paper. For more details, see [3–5, 15].
The graininess function is defined by \(\nu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow [0,\infty)\): \(\nu(t):=t-\varrho(t)\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\).
Definition 2.1
A function \(p: \mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is called ν-regressive provided \(1-\nu(t)p(t)\neq0\) for all \(t\in \mathbb{T}_{k}\). The set of all regressive and ld-continuous functions \(p:\mathbb{T} \rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) will be denoted by \(\mathcal{R}_{\nu}=\mathcal{R}_{\nu}(\mathbb{T})=\mathcal{R}_{\nu }(\mathbb{T}, \mathbb{R})\). We also define the set \(\mathcal{R}^{+}_{\nu}=\mathcal{R}^{+}_{\nu}(\mathbb{T}, \mathbb{R})=\{p\in \mathcal{R}_{\nu}:1-\nu(t)p(t)>0, \forall t\in\mathbb{T}\}\).
The graininess function is defined by \(\mu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow [0,\infty)\): \(\mu(t):=\sigma(t)-t\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\).
Definition 2.2
A function \(p: \mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is called regressive provided \(1+\mu(t)p(t)\neq0\) for all \(t\in \mathbb{T}^{k}\). The set of all regressive and rd-continuous functions \(p:\mathbb{T} \rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) will be denoted by \(\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T})=\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T}, \mathbb{R})\). We also define the set \(\mathcal{R}^{+}=\mathcal{R}^{+}(\mathbb{T}, \mathbb{R})=\{p\in \mathcal{R}:1+\mu(t)p(t)>0, \forall t\in\mathbb{T}\}\).
Lemma 2.1
([15], Zorn’s lemma)
Suppose that \((P,\preceq)\) is a partially ordered set. A subset T is totally ordered if for any s, t in T we have \(s\preceq t\) or \(t\preceq s\). Such a set T has an upper bound u in P if \(t\preceq u\) for all t in T. Suppose that a nonempty partially ordered set P has the property that every nonempty chain has an upper bound in P. Then the set P contains at least one maximal element.
In order to introduce the concept of changing-periodic time scales precisely and concisely, we need the following definitions.
Definition 2.3
We say a time scale is an infinite time scale if one of the following conditions is satisfied: \(\sup\mathbb{T}=+\infty\) and \(\inf\mathbb{T}=-\infty\) or \(\sup\mathbb{T}=+\infty\) or \(\inf\mathbb{T}=-\infty\).
Definition 2.4
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a time scale, we say \(\mathbb{T}\) is a zero-periodic time scale if and only if there exists no nonzero real number ω such that \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\).
Remark 2.2
By Definition 2.4, it follows that a finite union of the closed intervals can be regarded as a zero-periodic time scale. The single point set \(\{a\}\) can also be regarded as a closed interval since \(\{a\}=[a,a]\) in this paper. For convenience, \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\) denotes the zero-periodic time scale.
Definition 2.5
A timescale sequence \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) is called well-connected if and only if for \(i\neq j\), we have \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\cap\mathbb{T}_{j}=\{t_{ij}^{k}\}_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\), where \(\{t_{ij}^{k}\}\) is a countable points set or an empty set, and \(t_{ij}^{k}\) is called the connected point between \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) and \(\mathbb{T}_{j}\) for each \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\), the set \(\{t_{ij}^{k}\}\) is called the connected points set of this well-connected sequence.
Remark 2.3
Clearly the connected points set of a well-connected sequence can be an empty set. Hence, it follows that if \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i}=\emptyset\), then \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) is well connected.
We now introduce a new concept of time scales called ‘changing-periodic time scales’.
Definition 2.6
- (a)
\(\mathbb{T}= (\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i} )\cup\mathbb{T}_{r}\) and \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) is a well-connected timescale sequence, where \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}[\alpha_{i},\beta_{i}]\) and k is some finite number, and \([\alpha_{i},\beta_{i}]\) are closed intervals for \(i=1,2,\ldots,k\) or \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\);
- (b)
\(S_{i}\) is a nonempty subset of \(\mathbb{R}\) with \(0\notin S_{i}\) for each \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\) and \(\Pi= (\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}S_{i} )\cup R_{0}\), where \(R_{0}=\{0\}\) or \(R_{0}=\emptyset\);
- (c)
for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\) and all \(\omega\in S_{i}\), we have \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), i.e., \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is an ω-periodic time scale;
- (d)
for \(i\neq j\), for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\backslash\{ t_{ij}^{k}\}\) and all \(\omega\in S_{j}\), we have \(t+\omega\notin\mathbb{T}\), where \(\{t_{ij}^{k}\}\) is the connected points set of the timescale sequence \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\);
- (e)
\(R_{0}=\{0\}\) if and only if \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\) is a zero-periodic time scale and \(R_{0}=\emptyset\) if and only if \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\);
Remark 2.4
From Definition 2.6, it follows that if \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale, then the remain timescale \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\) is a finite union of the closed intervals or \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\), i.e., \(R_{0}=\{0\}\) or \(R_{0}=\emptyset\).
Remark 2.5
From condition (c) in Definition 2.6, for all connected points \(t_{ij}^{k}\), \(i\neq j\), we have \(t_{ij}^{k}\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\) and \(t_{ij}^{k}\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), for all \(\omega\in S_{i}\) and \(\omega\in S_{j}\), we have \(t_{ij}^{k}+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\subset\mathbb{T}\) and \(t_{ij}^{k}+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\subset\mathbb{T}\).
Now we introduce the following related concept.
Definition 2.7
A changing-periodic time scale is called complete if and only if its remain timescale is an empty set, i.e, \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\); similarly, \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\neq\emptyset\) if and only if \(\mathbb{T}\) is noncomplete.
We now prove the following proposition.
Proposition 2.1
All periodic time scales are particular changing-periodic time scales and complete.
Proof
Let \(\mathbb{T}=\mathbb{T}_{j}\), \(S=S_{j}\), \(j\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\). Since \(\mathbb{T}=\mathbb{T}\cup\emptyset\), by Definition 2.6, we can take \(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i}=\mathbb{T}\cup (\bigcup_{i\neq j}\emptyset )\) and \(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}S_{i}=S\cup (\bigcup_{i\neq j}\emptyset )\), where S is the periods set of \(\mathbb{T}\), then \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\) and \(R_{0}=\emptyset\). Now by Definition 2.6 and Definition 2.7, we obtain the desired result. This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.6
From Definition 2.6, the following properties of changing-periodic time scales are immediate.
Theorem 2.7
- (1)
If \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), then there must exist some \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\) such that \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\cup\mathbb{T}_{r}\). Furthermore, if \(\mathbb{T}\) is complete, then \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\).
- (2)
If \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), \(\omega\in S_{i}\), then \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\subset\mathbb{T}\).
- (3)
If \(i\neq j\), then \((\mathbb{T}_{i}\cap\mathbb {T}_{j} )\backslash\{t_{ij}^{k}\}=\emptyset\), \(S_{i}\cap S_{j}=\emptyset\).
- (4)
If \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\backslash\{t_{ij}^{k}\}\), \(t+\omega\in \mathbb{T}\) for \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), then \(\omega\in S_{i}\).
- (5)
If \(\omega\in S_{i}\), \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\) for \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), then \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\).
Proof
From Definition 2.6, (1) and (2) are obvious, and hence we need to prove (3), (4) and (5).
To prove (3), if there exists some \(t\in (\mathbb{T}_{i}\cap\mathbb{T}_{j} )\backslash\{t_{ij}^{k}\} \), \(i\neq j\), then \(t+\alpha\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), \(\forall\alpha\in S_{i}\) and \(t+\beta\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), \(\forall\beta\in S_{j}\), but this contradicts condition (d) in Definition 2.6. Similarly, if there exists some \(\tau\in S_{i}\cap S_{j}\), \(i\neq j\), then \(t+\tau\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), \(\tau\in S_{j}\), \(\forall t\in \mathbb{T}_{i}\) and \(t+\tau\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), \(\tau\in S_{i}\), \(\forall t\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), which also contradicts condition (d) in Definition 2.6.
To prove (4), we assume that \(\omega\notin S_{i}\): case (1) \(\omega\notin R_{0}\), then there must exist \(S_{j}\) such that \(\omega\in S_{j}\), \(i\neq j\), but then \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\) for \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\backslash\{t_{ij}^{k}\}\), which contradicts condition (d) in Definition 2.6; case (2) \(\omega\in R_{0}\), then from \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\), we have \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{r}\), but this contradicts the fact that \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\).
To prove (5), we assume that \(t\notin\mathbb{T}_{i}\): case (1) \(t\notin\mathbb{T}_{r}\), then there must exist \(\mathbb{T}_{j}\) such that \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{j}\), \(i\neq j\) and t is obviously not a connected point between \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) and \(\mathbb{T}_{j}\), then \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\) for \(\omega\in S_{i}\), which contradicts condition (d) in Definition 2.6; case (2) \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{r}\), from \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}\), we have \(\omega\in R_{0}\), but this contradicts the fact that \(\omega\in S_{i}\). This completes the proof. □
In view of the characteristics of changing-periodic time scales (Theorem 2.7), we can introduce an index function \(\tau_{t}:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}^{+}\cup\{0\}\) such that for \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}\) holds. This function plays a very important role in introducing well-defined functions on time scales. Formally, we have the following definition of \(\tau_{t}\).
Definition 2.8
Remark 2.8
- (i)
for \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), we have \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}\);
- (ii)for each \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), \(t_{1},t_{2}\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\) if and only if \(\tau_{t_{1}}=\tau_{t_{2}}=i\). Furthermore, for \(t_{1},t_{2}\in\mathbb {T}_{r}\neq\emptyset\) if and only if \(\tau_{t_{1}}=\tau_{t_{2}}=0\), i.e., \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\mathbb{T}_{0}\) (see Figure 2).
Remark 2.9
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale, for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) and all \(\omega\in S_{\tau_{t}}\), we have \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}\subset\mathbb{T}\). It is also obvious that if \(S_{i}\) is an adaption set generated by some given \(t_{0}\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\), then \(S_{\tau_{t_{0}}}\) is the adaption set for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\) since \(\tau_{t_{0}}=\tau_{t}=i\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{i}\).
Now we can prove the following proposition.
Proposition 2.2
\(\mathbb{T}\) is an ω-periodic time scale if and only if we can obtain its index function \(\tau_{t}\equiv z\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), where z denotes some positive integer.
Proof
If \(\mathbb{T}\) is an ω-periodic time scale, then we find \(S=\{n\omega:n\in\mathbb{Z}\}\), and for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) and all \(\tilde{\tau}\in S\), we have \(t+\tilde{\tau}\in\mathbb{T}\). Thus, by Proposition 2.1 and Remark 2.8, there exists some positive integer z such that \(\mathbb{T}=\mathbb{T}_{z}\) and \(S=S_{z}\), i.e., we can choose the index function \(\tau _{t}\equiv z\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\).
If \(\tau_{t}\equiv z\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), then there exists an adaption set \(S_{\tau_{t}}=S_{z}\) for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) such that for any \(\omega\in S_{\tau_{t}}\), we have \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}=\mathbb{T}\). Hence, \(\mathbb{T}\) is ω-periodic. This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.10
All changing-periodic time scales can be equipped with the corresponding index functions such that for all \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) and all \(\omega\in S_{\tau_{t}}\), \(t+\omega\in\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}\subset\mathbb{T}\).
We are now in the position to prove the following important theorem which classifies the time scales with bounded graininess function μ as changing-periodic time scales.
Theorem 2.11
If \(\mathbb{T}\) is an infinite time scale and the graininess function \(\mu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) is bounded, then \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale.
Proof
Now we will show that \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. We divide the proof into the following steps.
Step II. For the time scale \(\mathbb{T}^{*}_{1}:=\overline{\mathbb{T}\backslash\mathbb{T}_{0}^{1}}\), where A̅ denotes the closure of the set A, by replacing \(\mathbb{T}\) with \(\mathbb{T}_{1}^{*}\) and repeating Step I, we can obtain the periodic sub-timescale \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{2}\). For the time scale \(\mathbb{T}^{*}_{2}:=\overline{\mathbb{T}\backslash(\mathbb {T}_{0}^{1}\cup\mathbb{T}_{0}^{2})}\), by replacing \(\mathbb{T}\) with \(\mathbb{T}_{2}^{*}\) and repeating Step I, we can obtain the periodic sub-timescale \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{3}\). Similarly, we can obtain \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{4},\ldots,\mathbb{T}_{0}^{n}\ldots\) . Obviously, the timescale sequence \(\{\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) is well connected and \((\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\cap\mathbb{T}_{0}^{j} )\backslash\{ t_{ij0}^{k}\}=\emptyset\) for \(i\neq j\), where \(\{t_{ij0}^{k}\}\) is the connected points set between \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\) and \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{j}\). If for some sufficiently large \(n_{0}\), still \(\mathbb{T}_{n_{0}}^{*}=\overline{\mathbb{T}\backslash\bigcup_{i=1}^{n_{0}}\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}}\) is an infinite time scale, then we repeat Step I again until the remaining timescale \(\mathbb{T}\backslash\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}=\emptyset\), or a finite union of the closed intervals.
From Steps I, II, III, we find \((\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i} )\cup (\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}[\alpha_{i},\beta_{i}] )=\mathbb{T}\), where k is some finite number and \([\alpha_{i},\beta_{i}]\) are closed intervals for \(i=1,2,\ldots,k\), or \((\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i} )=\mathbb{T}\). Therefore, \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. This completes the proof. □
From the proof of Theorem 2.11, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 2.3
If \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i}\), where \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is \(\omega_{i}\)-periodic for each \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), then there exists a well-connected timescale sequence \(\{\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) such that \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\), where \(\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\) is \(\omega_{0}^{i}\)-periodic. Furthermore, \(\mathbb{T}\) is a complete changing-periodic time scale.
Proof
Since \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is periodic for each \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), the graininess function \(\mu_{i}:\mathbb{T}_{i}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) is bounded for each \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\). Thus, the graininess function μ of \(\mathbb{T}\) is also bounded. Therefore, in view of Theorem 2.11, \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. Further, from the proof of Theorem 2.11, \(\mathbb{T}\) can be decomposed into the union of all elements in the well-connected periodic timescale sequence \(\{\mathbb{T}_{0}^{i}\}_{i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}\) and \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\). Now, by Definition 2.6 and Definition 2.7, \(\mathbb{T}\) is a complete changing-periodic time scale. This completes the proof. □
Now we shall demonstrate some complete changing-periodic time scales.
Example 2.12
Example 2.13
Example 2.14
The above examples lead to the following immediate propositions.
Proposition 2.4
Let \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) be constant-periodic time scales for all \(i\in I\), then \(\bigcup_{i\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i}\) may not be a constant-periodic time scale, where I is an index number set.
Proposition 2.5
Let \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) be constant-periodic time scales with \(\omega_{i}\)-period for all \(i\in I\), and \(\omega_{i}\) is a natural number for each \(i\in I\). If all the numbers in the set \(\{\omega_{i}\}_{i\in I}\) have a lowest common multiple ω, then \(\bigcup_{i\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is an ω-periodic time scale.
Example 2.15
Now we construct some changing-periodic time scales with μ bounded.
Example 2.16
Example 2.17
Remark 2.18
In [14] it has been shown that time scales considered in Examples 2.16 and 2.17 are almost periodic time scales. In fact, in our next corollary we shall show that all concepts of almost periodic time scales discussed in [13, 14] are actually changing-periodic time scales.
Corollary 2.19
Almost periodic time scales (cf. [13, 14]) are particular changing-periodic time scales.
Proof
Obviously, if \(\mathbb{T}\) is an almost periodic time scale, then \(\mu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) is bounded, and thus, by Theorem 2.11, \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.20
Now we state and prove the following theorem, which plays an important role in establishing classical functions on changing-periodic time scales.
Theorem 2.21
(Decomposition theorem of time scales)
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be an infinite time scale and the graininess function \(\mu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) be bounded, then \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale, i.e., there exists a countable periodic decomposition such that \(\mathbb{T}= (\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i} )\cup \mathbb{T}_{r}\) and \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is an ω-periodic sub-timescale, \(\omega\in S_{i}\), \(i\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\), where \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\), \(S_{i}\), \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\) satisfy the conditions in Definition 2.6.
Proof
From Theorem 2.11, we know that \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale, so one can obtain the decomposition of the time scale \(\mathbb{T}\) directly from Definition 2.6. The proof is complete. □
Remark 2.22
From the definition of the index function (i.e., Definition 2.8), we see that a decomposition of a time scale can be determined by its index function τ. In fact, as a consequence of Theorem 2.21, we have the following result.
Theorem 2.23
(Periodic coverage theorem of time scales)
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be an infinite time scale and the graininess function \(\mu:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) be bounded, then \(\mathbb{T}\) can be covered by countable periodic time scales.
Proof
It is interesting to note that in view of Theorem 2.21, Proposition 2.3 and Definition 2.6, it is possible to introduce another concept of changing-periodic time scales.
Definition 2.9
We say that \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale if and only if \(\mathbb{T}\) is a countable union of periodic time scales.
Remark 2.24
According to Remark 2.2, a finite union of closed intervals \(\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}[\alpha_{i},\beta_{i}]:=\mathbb{T}_{r}\) is a zero-periodic time scale. Thus, \(\mathbb{T}= (\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i} )\cup \mathbb{T}_{r}\) can be regarded as a union of periodic time scales. Therefore, by Proposition 2.3, Definition 2.6 is equivalent to Definition 2.9.
Remark 2.25
Remark 2.26
For simplicity, since the remain timescale \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\) can be regarded as the zero-periodic time scale, a changing-periodic time scale can be denoted as \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{T}_{i}\) which contains \(\mathbb{T}_{r}\).
3 Almost periodicity and almost automorphy of functions on changing-periodic time scales
By virtue of Section 2, we now propose a completely new concept of almost periodic functions on changing-periodic time scales, which includes not only the concept of almost periodic functions on periodic time scales, but also the concept of almost periodic functions on almost periodic time scales, and it is more general and comprehensive. For this, we need the following notations: Let \(\alpha^{\tau}=\{\alpha_{n}^{\tau}\}\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\) and \(\beta^{\tau}=\{\beta^{\tau}_{n}\}\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\) be two adaption factors sequences for t under the index function τ. Then \(\beta^{\tau}\subset\alpha^{\tau}\) means that \(\beta^{\tau}\) is a subsequence of \(\alpha^{\tau}\); \(\alpha^{\tau}+\beta^{\tau}=\{\alpha^{\tau}_{n}+\beta^{\tau}_{n}\}\); \(-\alpha^{\tau}=\{-\alpha^{\tau}_{n}\}\); \(\mathbb{E}^{n}\) denotes \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) or \(\mathbb{C}^{n}\), D denotes an open set in \(\mathbb{E}^{n}\) or \(D=\mathbb{E}^{n}\), and S denotes an arbitrary compact subset of D. We will also need the translation operator \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}\), \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)=g(t,x)\), which means that \(g(t,x)=\lim_{n\rightarrow+\infty}f(t+\alpha^{\tau}_{n},x)\) provided the limit exists.
Definition 3.1
Remark 3.1
Since the changing-periodic time scales include periodic and almost periodic time scales, if \(\mathbb{T}\) is a τ̃-periodic time scale, then \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\), \(R_{0}=\emptyset\) and \(S_{\tau_{t}}=\{n\tilde{\tau}:n\in\mathbb{Z}\}\), so Definition 3.1 is equivalent to Definition 3.10 in [13]; if \(\mathbb{T}\) is an almost periodic time scale, then μ is bounded, so \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale, then Definition 3.1 includes Definition 14 in [14] since Definition 3.1 covers the almost periodicity on the part \(\mathbb{T}\backslash(\mathbb{T}\cap\mathbb{T}^{-\tau})\) of Definition 14 in [14].
Remark 3.2
Now we give another definition which in view of Theorem 2.21 is equivalent to Definition 3.1.
Definition 3.2
Assume that \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. Let \(f(t,x)\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) if for any given adaption factors sequence \((\alpha^{\tau})'\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\), there exists a subsequence \(\alpha^{\tau}\subset(\alpha^{\tau})'\) such that \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)\) exists uniformly on \(\mathbb{T}\times S\), then \(f(t,x)\) is called a local-almost periodic function in t uniformly for \(x\in D\).
Example 3.3
From Definition 3.2, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 3.1
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. If \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) is a local-almost periodic in t uniformly for \(x\in D\), then \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}_{0}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) is local-almost periodic in t uniformly for \(x\in D\), where \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\) is a changing-periodic time scale and \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\subset\mathbb{T}\).
Proof
Let \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) be uniformly local-almost periodic, then, by Definition 3.2, for any adaption factors sequence \((\alpha^{\tau})'\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\subset\Pi\), there exists a subsequence \(\alpha^{\tau}\subset(\alpha^{\tau})'\) such that \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)\) exists uniformly on \(\mathbb{T}\times S\), where S is any compact set in D. Consequently, \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)\) exists uniformly on \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\times S\). This completes the proof. □
Next, we have the following definition.
Definition 3.3
Let \(f,g\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) be uniformly local-almost periodic and \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. We say f and g are synchronously local-almost periodic if f, g are almost periodic on the same periodic sub-timescales of \(\mathbb{T}\).
From Theorem 2.21, we can deduce the following result for synchronously local-almost periodic functions.
Theorem 3.4
If \(f,g\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) are two synchronously local-almost periodic functions, then, for any \(\varepsilon>0\), the intersection of ε-local translation numbers sets of f and g is a nonempty relatively dense set, i.e., \(E\{\varepsilon,f,S\}\cap E\{\varepsilon,g,S\}\) is a nonempty relatively dense set.
Proof
If \(f,g\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) are two synchronously local-almost periodic functions, then, by Definition 3.3, f, g are almost periodic on the same periodic sub-timescales of \(\mathbb{T}\). Now, from Theorem 3.22 in [13], the desired conclusion follows immediately. This completes the proof. □
In the following result we shall use the decomposition theorem of time scales (i.e., Theorem 2.21) to establish the existence and uniqueness of local-almost periodic solutions for the dynamic equation (1).
Theorem 3.5
Proof
Remark 3.6
By the above Theorem 3.5, we can get the following corollary.
Corollary 3.7
In what follows, we will give the concept of combinable-almost periodic functions on changing-periodic time scales by Definition 3.1.
Definition 3.4
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. If there exists an \(\omega_{i_{0}}\)-periodic sub-timescale set \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\}_{i_{0}\in I}\) such that the periods set \(\{\omega_{i_{0}}\}_{i_{0}\in I}\) has a lowest common multiple ω and f is almost periodic on \(\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\) for each \(i_{0}\), where I is a combinable index number set, then f is called a combinable-almost periodic function on \(\mathbb{T}\). In fact, f is almost periodic on the ω-periodic sub-timescale \(\bigcup_{i_{0}\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\). Further, if \(\bigcup_{i_{0}\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}=\mathbb{T}\), then f is called the globally combinable-almost periodic function on \(\mathbb{T}\).
The following two corollaries are immediate consequences of Theorem 3.5.
Corollary 3.8
Corollary 3.9
The function f is globally combinable-almost periodic on \(\mathbb{T}\) if and only if f is an almost periodic function on the periodic time scale \(\mathbb{T}\).
Proof
Since \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is an \(\omega_{i}\)-periodic sub-timescale, from \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{i\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i}\), we find that \(\mathbb{T}\) is an ω-periodic time scale, where ω is a lowest common multiple of \(\{\omega_{i}\}_{i\in I}\) and I is a combinable index number set. Hence, from Definition 3.4 the desired conclusion follows immediately. This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.10
From Corollary 3.9 it follows that the concept of almost periodic functions on periodic time scales is equivalent to the concept of globally combinable-almost periodic functions on changing-periodic time scales.
Next, we introduce the concepts of local-almost automorphic functions on changing-periodic time scales.
Definition 3.5
- (i)Let \(f:\mathbb{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{X}\) be a bounded continuous function. We say that f is local-almost automorphic if for every adaption factor sequence \(\{s_{n}^{\tau}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\subset\Pi\), we can extract a subsequence \(\{\tau_{n}^{\tau}\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\) such thatis well defined for each \(t\in\mathbb{T}\), and$$ g(t)=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f\bigl(t+\tau_{n}^{\tau} \bigr) $$for each \(t\in\mathbb{T}\). We shall denote by \(AA(\mathbb{T},\mathbb{X})\) the set of all such functions.$$ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}g\bigl(t-\tau_{n}^{\tau} \bigr)=f(t) $$
- (ii)
A continuous function \(f:\mathbb{T}\times B\rightarrow\mathbb{X}\) is said to be local-almost automorphic if \(f(t,x)\) is local-almost automorphic in \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) uniformly for all \(x\in B\), where B is any bounded subset of \(\mathbb{X}\) or \(B=\mathbb{X}\). We shall denote by \(AA(\mathbb{T}\times\mathbb{X},\mathbb{X})\) the set of all such functions.
Remark 3.11
Since the changing-periodic time scales include periodic and almost periodic time scales, if \(\mathbb{T}\) is a τ̃-periodic time scale, then \(\mathbb{T}_{r}=\emptyset\), \(R_{0}=\emptyset\) and \(S_{\tau_{t}}=\{n\tilde{\tau}:n\in\mathbb{Z}\}\). Thus, Definition 3.5 is equivalent to Definition 3.15 in [16]. Further, if \(\mathbb{T}\) is an almost periodic time scale, then μ is bounded, and hence \(\mathbb{T}\) is a changing-periodic time scale. Therefore, Definition 3.5 is more general than Definition 45 in [14] because Definition 3.5 covers the almost automorphy on the part \(\mathbb{T}\backslash\mathbb{T}_{0}\) of Definition 45 in [14].
Remark 3.12
From Definition 3.5 and the property of \(S_{\tau_{t}}\), we can obtain the local almost automorphy on the periodic sub-timescale \(\mathbb{T}_{\tau_{t}}\).
In fact, as a consequence of Definition 3.5, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 3.2
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. If \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) is a local-almost automorphic in t uniformly for \(x\in D\), then \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}_{0}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) is local-almost automorphic in t uniformly for \(x\in D\), where \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\) is a changing-periodic time scale and \(\mathbb{T}_{0}\subset\mathbb{T}\).
Proof
Let \(f\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) be uniformly local-almost automorphic, then by Definition 3.5, for any adaption factors sequence \((\alpha^{\tau})'\subset S_{\tau_{t}}\subset\Pi\), there exists a subsequence \(\alpha^{\tau}\subset(\alpha^{\tau})'\) such that \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)=g(t,x)\) and \(T_{-\alpha^{\tau}}g(t,x)=f(t,x)\) for each \(t\in\mathbb{T}\) uniformly for \(x\in S\), where S is any compact set in D. Thus it follows that \(T_{\alpha^{\tau}}f(t,x)=g(t,x)\) and \(T_{-\alpha^{\tau}}g(t,x)=f(t,x)\) for each \(t\in\mathbb{T}_{0}\) uniformly for \(x\in S\). This completes the proof. □
Definition 3.6
Let \(f,g\in C(\mathbb{T}\times D,\mathbb{E}^{n})\) be uniformly local-almost automorphic and \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. We say f and g are synchronously local-almost automorphic if f, g are almost automorphic on the same periodic sub-timescales of \(\mathbb{T}\).
Now we assume that in (1) and (2) \(A(t)\) is a local-almost automorphic matrix function and \(f(t)\) is a local-almost automorphic vector function. Further, we let \(f(t)\) and \(A(t)\) be synchronously local-almost automorphic functions.
In the following result, as a further application of our decomposition theorem of time scales (i.e., Theorem 2.21), we shall establish the existence and uniqueness of local-almost automorphic solutions for the dynamic equation (1).
Theorem 3.13
Proof
Remark 3.14
By the above Theorem 3.13, we can get the following corollary.
Corollary 3.15
In what follows, we will introduce the concept of combinable-almost automorphic functions on changing-periodic time scales.
Definition 3.7
Let \(\mathbb{T}\) be a changing-periodic time scale. If there exists an \(\omega_{i_{0}}\)-periodic sub-timescale set \(\{\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\}_{i_{0}\in I}\) such that the periods set \(\{\omega_{i_{0}}\}_{i_{0}\in I}\) has a lowest common multiple ω and f is almost automorphic on \(\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\) for each \(i_{0}\), where I is a combinable index number set, then we say f is a combinable-almost automorphic function on \(\mathbb{T}\). In fact, then f is almost automorphic on the ω-periodic sub-timescale \(\bigcup_{i_{0}\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}\). Further, if \(\bigcup_{i_{0}\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i_{0}}=\mathbb{T}\), then f is called globally combinable-almost automorphic function on \(\mathbb{T}\).
The following two corollaries are immediate consequences of Theorem 3.13.
Corollary 3.16
Corollary 3.17
The function f is globally combinable-almost automorphic on \(\mathbb{T}\) if and only if f is almost automorphic on the periodic time scale \(\mathbb{T}\).
Proof
Since \(\mathbb{T}_{i}\) is an \(\omega_{i}\)-periodic sub-timescale, from \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{i\in I}\mathbb{T}_{i}\) it follows that \(\mathbb{T}\) is an ω-periodic time scale, where ω is a lowest common multiple of \(\{\omega_{i}\}_{i\in I}\) and I is a combinable index number set. Hence, the desired result follows from Definition 3.16. This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.18
From Corollary 3.17 it follows that the concept of almost automorphic functions on periodic time scales is equivalent to the concept of globally combinable-almost automorphic functions on changing-periodic time scales.
4 Conclusion
In this work we have introduced a completely new type of time scales - ‘changing periodic time scales’, and examined some of their properties. The main propose of this kind of time scales is to resolve the problems from an arbitrary time scale to the ones on periodic time scales. Our decomposition theorem of time scales divides an arbitrary time scale into a countable union of periodic time scales. This result not only provides us with a new approach to investigate problems by the known methods on periodic time scales, but also opens up new avenues to study local properties of the functions defined on time scales. It is clearly shown that the changing-periodic time scales are more general than the time scales with bounded graininess function μ, and therefore results obtained on this new type of time scales include all the known results on time scales with bounded graininess function μ. Hence, it is compelling to study problems on changing-periodic time scales. To illustrate the importance of our theory, first we introduce new concepts - ‘local-almost periodic functions’ and ‘local-almost automorphic functions’ on time scales, and then we use the properties of changing-periodic time scales to establish the local-almost periodicity and local-almost automorphy of solutions of dynamic equations.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Yunnan University Scientific Research Fund Project in China (No. 2013CG020), Yunnan Province Education Department Scientific Research Fund Project in China (No. 2014Y008), and Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department Applied Basic Research Project in China (No. 2014FB102).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Hilger, S: Differential and difference calculus - unified! Nonlinear Anal. 30(5), 2683-2694 (1997) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hilger, S: Generalized theorem of Hartman-Grobman on measure chains. J. Aust. Math. Soc. A 60(2), 157-191 (1996) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal, RP, Bohner, M, O’Regan, D, Peterson, A: Dynamic equations on time scales: a survey. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 141, 1-26 (2002) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bohner, M, Peterson, A: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston (2001) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal, RP, Bohner, M: Basic calculus on time scales and some of its applications. Results Math. 35, 3-22 (1999) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, C, Agarwal, RP: Uniformly rd-piecewise almost periodic functions with applications to the analysis of impulsive Δ-dynamic system on time scales. Appl. Math. Comput. 259, 271-292 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, C, Agarwal, RP: Exponential dichotomies of impulsive dynamic systems with applications on time scales. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2014). doi:10.1002/mma.3325 Google Scholar
- Wang, C, Li, Y: Weighted pseudo almost automorphic functions with applications to abstract dynamic equations on time scales. Ann. Pol. Math. 108, 225-240 (2013) MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, C, Agarwal, RP: Weighted piecewise pseudo almost automorphic functions with applications to abstract impulsive ∇-dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, 153 (2014) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, C: Almost periodic solutions of impulsive BAM neural networks with variable delays on time scales. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 2828-2842 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal, RP, Bohner, M, Saker, S: Dynamic Littlewood-type inequalities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143, 667-677 (2015) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaufmann, ER, Raffoul, YN: Periodic solutions for a neutral nonlinear dynamical equation on a time scale. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 319, 315-325 (2006) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li, Y, Wang, C: Uniformly almost periodic functions and almost periodic solutions to dynamic equations on time scales. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2011, Article ID 341520 (2011) Google Scholar
- Wang, C, Agarwal, RP: A further study of almost periodic time scales with some notes and applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 267384 (2014) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wilansky, A: Topics in Functional Analysis. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 45. Springer, Berlin (1967) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Lizama, C, Mesquita, JG: Almost automorphic solutions of dynamic equations on time scales. J. Funct. Anal. 265, 2267-2311 (2013) MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar