 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Rank one strange attractors in periodically kicked Chua’s system with time delay
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2015, Article number: 75 (2015)
Abstract
In this paper, rank one strange attractor in a periodically kicked timedelayed system is investigated. It is shown that rank one strange attractors occur when the delayed system under a periodic forcing undergoes Hopf bifurcation. Our discussion is based on the theory of rank one maps formulated by Wang and Young. As an example, periodically kicked Chua’s system with timedelay is considered, conditions for rank one chaos along with the results of numerical simulations are presented.
Introduction
Recently, a chaos theory on rank one maps has been developed by Wang and Young. In 2001, Wang and Oksasoglu [1] gave simple conditions that guarantee the existence of strange attractors with a single direction of instability and certain controlled behaviors. In 2008, Wang and Young accomplished a more comprehensive understanding of the complicated geometric and dynamical structures of a specific class of nonuniformly hyperbolic homoclinic tangles. For certain differential equations, through their welldefined computational process, the existence of the indicated phenomenon of rank one chaos was verified [2]. In 2009, Chen and Han studied the existence of rank one chaos in a periodically kicked planar equation with heteroclinic cycle [3]. In 2012, Fang studied the synchronization between rankone chaotic systems without and with delay using linear delayed feedback control method [4].
In 1984, Jackson et al. studied Chua’s circuit as follows [5]:
where \(v_{C_{1}}\), \(v_{C_{2}}\), \(i_{L}\) denote voltage across \(C_{1}\), \(C_{2}\) and current through L, respectively. They reported that a chaotic attractor has been observed in Eq. (1). In [6], Wang et al. considered Eq. (1) as the following form:
They studied this timedelay Chua’s circuit by theoretical analysis, computer simulations and circuit experiments. In [7], Wang and Oksasoglu considered Chua’s system of the following form:
where \(f(x)\) is chosen to be a cubic function of the form \(f(x) = cx + dx^{3}\). They researched rank one strange attractors in this periodically kicked Chua’s circuit.
In this paper, we first try to develop rank one theory from an ordinary differential equation to a timedelayed system, then consider Chua’s system (3) as the following form:
where a, b, c, d and τ are real parameters, \(\varepsilon{P_{T}}y(t)\) is a timeperiodic forcing term with \(P_{T}=\sum_{n=\infty}^{\infty}\delta(tnt)\). The stability of equilibria, the bifurcating of periodic solutions and the rank one chaos of the periodically kicked delayed system are investigated.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give preliminaries about the rank one chaotic theory. In Section 3, we derive the rank one chaotic theory for a timedelayed system. In Section 4, we take Chua’s system as an example. In Section 5, numerical simulations are presented. Conclusions are given in Section 6.
Preliminaries
To properly motivate the studies presented in this paper, we first give a brief overview on the studies of rank one strange attractors, which can be constructed in the following way.
Following the work done by Wang and Young in [7], we let \(\mathbf{u}\in\mathrm{R}^{m}\), \(m\geq2\) be the phase variable and \(t\in\mathrm{R}\) be the time. Consider the following system of equations:
where \(\mathbf{A}_{\mu}\) is a real m by m matrix, and \(f_{\mu}(\mathbf{u})\) is a vectorvalued real analytic function in u defined on a given neighborhood of \(\mathbf{u}=\mathbf{0}\) such that \(f\mathbf{(0)}=\mathbf{0}\), \(D_{\mathbf{u}}f\mathbf{(0)}=\mathbf{0}\). Both \(\mathbf{A}_{\mu}\) and \(f_{\mu}(\mathbf{u})\) are smooth dependents of parameter μ around \(\mu=0\). ε is a parameter that controls the magnitude of the forcing, \(\Phi (\mathbf{u})\) is a real vectorvalued function of u that represents the shape of the forcing and \(P_{T}=\sum^{\infty}_{n=\infty}\delta(tnT)\). When \(\varepsilon=0\), the undisturbed system is
Firstly, we give several definitions.
Definition 1
[8]
Let \(f:M\rightarrow M\) be a diffeomorphism of a compact Riemannian manifold onto itself. We say that f is an Anosov diffeomorphism if the tangent space at every \(x \in M\) is split into \(E^{u}(x) \oplus E^{s}(x)\), where \(E^{u}\) and \(E^{s}\) are Dfinvariant subspaces, \(Df_{E^{u}}\) is uniformly expanding and \(Df_{E^{s}}\) is uniformly contracting. A compact finvariant set \(\Lambda\subset M\) is called an attractor if there is a neighborhood U of Λ called its basin such that \(f^{n} x \rightarrow \Lambda\) for every \(x \in U\). Λ is called an Axiom A attractor if the tangent bundle over Λ is split into \(E^{u} \oplus E^{s}\) as above.
Definition 2
[8]
Let f be a \(C^{2}\) diffeomorphism with an Axiom A attractor Λ. Then there is a unique finvariant Borel probability measure μ on Λ that is characterized by each of the following (equivalent) conditions:

(i)
μ has absolutely continuous conditional measures on unstable manifolds;

(ii)
$$h_{\mu}(f)=\int\bigl\operatorname{det}(Df_{E^{u}})\bigr\,d\mu, $$
where \(h_{\mu}(f)\) is the metric entropy of f;

(iii)
there is a set \(V \subset U\) having full Lebesgue measure such that for every continuous observable \(\varphi: U \rightarrow R\), we have, for every \(x \in V\),
$$\frac{1}{n}\sum^{n1}_{i=0}\varphi \bigl(f^{i}x\bigr)\rightarrow\int\varphi \,d\mu; $$ 
(iv)
μ is the zeronoise limit of small random perturbations of f.
Then the invariant measure μ is called the SinaiRuelleBowen measure, or SRB measure, of f.
Definition 3
Given a map f, the Lyapunov exponent is defined at \(x_{0}\) as follows:
where \(x_{i} = f(x_{i1}) \) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,N1\)).
Now, we consider (5)_{ ε }. Assume the following:
(A1) Let \(\{\lambda_{i}\}^{m}_{i=1}\) be the eigenvalues of \(\mathbf{A}_{\mu}\). There is a conjugated pair,
such that \(\alpha(0)=0\), \(w(0)\neq0\), \((d/d\mu)\alpha(0)\neq0\), and there exists \(c>0\) such that \(\operatorname{Re}(\lambda_{i})<c\), \(i\geq3\).
Then the flow on the central manifold \(\mathrm{W}^{c}\) of system (5)_{0} can be explicitly written by using a complex variable z in the following normal form:
Write that
and assume that
(A2) \(E(0)>0\).
Assume that a real linear coordinate change \(\mathbf{u}\rightarrow L_{\mu}\mathbf{u}:=(\xi,\eta,\mathbf{w})^{T}\) transfers Eq. (5)_{ ε } into
where ξ, η are scalars, w is an \(m2\)vector, \(A^{(s)}\) is an \((m2)\) by \((m2)\) matrix of eigenvalues with negative real parts, and
Let \((\hat{r},\hat{\mathbf{s}})\in\mathrm{R}^{+}\times \mathrm{S}^{m1}\) be such that \((\xi,\eta,{\mathbf{w}})^{T}=\hat{r}\hat{\mathbf{s}}\), and define
Further let \(\{{\hat{\mathbf{s}}_{0}=(\cos \theta,\sin\theta,\mathbf{0})\in\mathrm{S}^{m1},\theta\in [0,2\pi)}\}\) be the unit circle in \((\xi,\eta)\)plane in \((\xi,\eta,\mathbf{w})\)space, and define
The timeT map of Eq. (5)_{ ε } is denoted by \(F_{\mu,\varepsilon,T}\), where μ is the bifurcation parameter of the unperturbed Eq. (5)_{0} and ε, T are the parameters of forcing. Assume that

(a)
(A1)(A2) hold for Eq. (5)_{ ε };

(b)
\(\varphi(\theta)\) in Eq. (10) is a Morse function; and

(c)
μ, ε are such that \(0 <\mu\ll 1\), \(0 < \varepsilon \ll 1\).
The following theorem is obtained by Wang and Oksasoglu [9].
Theorem 1
Let the values of μ and ε be fixed and assume that (a)(c) hold. Regard the period T of the forcing as a parameter and define \(F_{T} = F_{\mu,\varepsilon,T}\). Then there exists a constant \(K_{1}\), determined exclusively by \(\varphi(\theta)\), such that if
then there exists a positive measure set \(\Delta\subset(\mu^{1},\infty)\) for T so that for \(T\in\Delta\), \(F_{T}\) has a strange attractor Λ admitting no periodic sinks. This is to say that there exists an open neighborhood U of Λ in \({R}^{m}\) such that \(F_{T}\) has a positive Lyapunov exponent for Lebesgue almost every point in U. Furthermore, \(F_{T}\) admits an ergodic SRB measure, with respect to which almost every point of U is generic.
Rank one strange attractors of a delayed system
In this section we consider the nonlinear delayed differential equation
where \(\mathbf{u}_{t}(\theta) = \mathbf{u}(t+\theta)\), \(\theta\in [r,0] \) for \(r>0\), \(L_{\mu}:C[r,0] \to\mathrm{R}^{n}\) is a linear operator, \(f_{\mu}:\mathrm{C}[r,0] \to\mathrm{R}^{n}\) is a nonlinear term satisfying \(f_{\mu}(\mathbf{0})=\mathbf{0}\), \(D_{\mathbf{u}} f_{\mu}(\mathbf{0})=\mathbf{0}\). \(f_{\mu}\) and \(L_{\mu}\) depend on μ analytically for \(\mu\) is sufficiently small, and \(P_{T}=\sum^{\infty} _{n=\infty}\delta(tnT)\). When \(\varepsilon=0\), the undisturbed system is
For the linear system \(\dot{\mathbf{u}}=L_{\mu}\mathbf{u}_{t}\), there is an \(n\times n\) matrix \(\eta(\cdot,\mu):[r,0]\rightarrow \mathrm{R}^{n^{2}}\) such that for any \(\varphi\in\mathrm{C}[r,0]\)
Let the spectral set of \(L_{\mu}\)
satisfy the following:
(B1) There is a simple conjugated pair
such that \(a(0)=0\), \(\omega(0)=\omega_{0}>0\), \((d/d\mu)a(0)\neq0\), and there exists \(c>0\) such that for any \(\lambda\in\sigma(\mu)\), \(\lambda\neq\lambda_{1,2}\), \(\operatorname{Re}(\lambda_{i})<c\), \(i\geq3\).
Then the flow on the central manifold \(\mathrm{W}^{c}\) of system (11)_{0} can be written by using Hassard’s method [10] in the following normal form:
at \(\mu=0\). Assume that \(g_{20}=g_{11}=g_{02}=0\). We write \(\frac{g_{21}}{2}\) as
Suppose that
(B2) \(E(0)>0\).
Then we know that system (11)_{0} has a supercritical Hopf bifurcation near the equilibrium.
We define for \(\phi\in\mathrm{C}[r,0]\)
and
Since \(\frac{d\mathbf{u}_{t}}{d\theta}=\frac{d\mathbf{u}_{t}}{dt}\), Eq. (11)_{ ε } becomes
For \(\theta=0\) Eq. (17) is Eq. (11)_{ ε }.
Following Hassard’s method, we know that z satisfies the equation
where \(q^{*}(\theta)\) is an eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue \(i\omega_{0}\) of \(A^{*}\) which is the adjoint operator of \(A(0)\).
When \(\mu=0\), let \(A=A(0)\) and we define
Then from Eq. (11)_{ ε } and the definitions of A, \(A^{*}\) we obtain
At \(\theta=0\),
We can calculate
Then Eq. (17) can be written as
Let \(W\in\mathcal{B}\), where ℬ is a Banach space, let \(z=x+iy\) in (21), and define
We further let \(x=\cos\theta\), \(y=\sin\theta\), \(\mathbf{W}=\mathbf{0}\) in (22), then \(\{\hat{\mathbf{s}}_{0}=(\cos \theta,\sin\theta,\mathbf{0})\in S\times\mathcal{B}, \theta\in [0,2\pi)\}\) is the unit circle in \((x,y)\)plane in \((x,y,\mathbf{W})\)space. Define
The timeT map of Eq. (11)_{ ε } is denoted by \(F_{\mu,\varepsilon,T}\), where μ is the bifurcation parameter of the unperturbed Eq. (11)_{0} and ε, T are the parameters of forcing. Assume that

(a)
(B1)(B2) hold for Eq. (11)_{ ε };

(b)
\(\phi(\theta)\) in Eq. (23) is a Morse function; and

(c)
μ, ε are such that \(0 < \mu\ll 1\), \(0 < \varepsilon\ll 1\).
Then we obtain the following.
Theorem 2
Let the values of μ and ε be fixed and assume that (a)(c) hold. Regard the period T of the forcing as a parameter and define \(F_{T} = F_{\mu,\varepsilon,T}\). Then there exists a constant \(K_{2}\), determined exclusively by \(\phi(\theta)\), such that if
then there exists a positive measure set \(\Delta\subset(\mu^{1},\infty)\) for T so that for \(T\in\Delta\), \(F_{T}\) has a strange attractor Λ admitting no periodic sinks. This is to say that there exists an open neighborhood U of Λ such that \(F_{T}\) has a positive Lyapunov exponent for Lebesgue almost every point in U. Furthermore, \(F_{T}\) admits an ergodic SRB measure, with respect to which almost every point of U is generic.
Proof
We can easily see that (B1), (B2) in Theorem 2 correspond to (A1), (A2) in Theorem 1. After transformations, Eq. (23) in \((x,y)\)plane corresponds to Eq. (10) in \((\xi,\eta)\)plane, they are on the central manifolds. Obviously the conditions in Theorem 1 are satisfied. □
Analysis of rank one strange attractors in delayed Chua’s system
In this section, we consider Eq. (4)_{ ε }. The corresponding undisturbed system is as follows:
It always has equilibria \(E_{i}^{*}(x_{i}^{*},y_{i}^{*},z_{i}^{*})\), \(i=1,2,3\), where
Let \(E^{*}=(x^{*}, y^{*}, z^{*})\) be an arbitrary equilibrium, and let \(\bar{x}(t) = x(t)x^{*}\), \(\bar{y}(t) = y(t)y^{*}\), \(\bar{z}(t) = z(t)z^{*}\), still denote \(\bar{x}(t)\), \(\bar{y}(t)\), \(\bar{z}(t)\) by \(x(t)\), \(y(t)\), \(z(t)\), respectively, then the linearized system of the corresponding equation at \(E^{*}\) is as follows:
where \(u(t)=[x(t),y(t),z(t)]^{T}\),
We consider the following cases.
(1) \(E^{*} = E^{*}_{1}\)
The characteristic equation of system (24) is
where \(\alpha_{1}=ac+1\), \(\alpha_{2}=aca\), \(\beta_{1}=ac\).
When \(\tau=0\), Eq. (25) becomes
The RouthHurwitz criterion implies that if
then all roots of Eq. (26) have negative real parts.
Suppose that iω (\(\omega>0\)) is a root of Eq. (25) in the imaginary axis. Substituting it to Eq. (25) and separating the real and imaginary parts, we have
which is equivalent to
Let \(z=\omega^{2}\), then Eq. (28) becomes
where \(e_{1}=\alpha_{1}^{2}2\alpha_{2}\), \(e_{2}=\alpha_{2}^{2}b^{2}\), \(e_{3}=b^{2}\beta_{1}^{2}\).
Since \(G(0)=b^{2}\beta_{1}^{2}<0\), \(G(+\infty)=+\infty\), we immediately obtain the following.
Lemma 1
Eq. (29) has at least one positive root since \(e_{3}<0\).
We assume that Eq. (29) has three positive roots, \(z_{1}\), \(z_{2}\), \(z_{3}\), and \(\omega_{1}=\sqrt{z_{1}}\), \(\omega_{2}=\sqrt{z_{2}}\), \(\omega_{3}=\sqrt{z_{3}}\).
According to (27), we have
where \(k=1,2,3\) and \(j=0,1,\ldots \) , then \(\pm i\omega_{k}\) is a pair of imaginary roots of Eq. (25) with \(\tau^{(j)}_{k}\).
Define
In order to investigate the distribution of the roots of Eq. (25), we need to introduce the following lemma [11].
Lemma 2
Consider the exponential polynomial
where \(\tau_{i}\ge0\), \(i=1,2,\ldots,m\), and \(p_{j}^{(i)}\) (\(i=0,1,\ldots,m\); \(j=1,2,\ldots,n\)) are constants. As \((\tau_{1}, \tau_{2},\ldots,\tau_{m})\) vary, the sum of the order of the zeros of \(P(\lambda,e^{  \lambda\tau_{1} } ,\ldots,e^{  \lambda\tau_{m} } )\) on the open right half plane can change if and only if there are zeros crossing the imaginary axis.
Let \(\lambda(\tau)=\alpha(\tau)+i\omega(\tau)\) be the root of Eq. (25) near \(\tau=\tau^{(j)}_{k}\) satisfying
Then the following transversality condition holds.
Lemma 3
Suppose that \(z_{k} = \omega_{k}^{2} \) and \(G'(z_{k} ) \ne0\), then \(\frac{\operatorname{Re} \lambda (\tau_{k}^{(j)} )}{{d\tau}} \) has the same sign as \(G'(z_{k} ) \).
Proof
Substituting \(\lambda(\tau) \) into Eq. (25) and taking the derivative with respect to τ, we obtain
Therefore,
When \(\tau = \tau_{k}^{(j)} \), \(\lambda = i\omega_{k}\), \(k = 1,2,3 \), we have
According to (29), (32) and (33), we have
where \(\Lambda =b^{2}\omega_{k}^{2}(\omega_{k}^{2}+\beta^{2}_{1})^{2} > 0\). Therefore,
□
Now we apply the Hopf bifurcation theorem for functional differential equations [12] and obtain the following results.
Theorem 3
Suppose that (H_{1}) holds. Then

(i)
when \(\tau\in[0,\tau_{0})\), the equilibrium \(E_{1}^{*}\) of system (4)_{0} is locally asymptotically stable,

(ii)
when \(\tau>\tau_{0}\), the equilibrium \(E_{1}^{*}\) of system (4)_{0} is unstable,

(iii)
when \(\tau=\tau_{0}\), system (4)_{0} undergoes Hopf bifurcation at \(E_{1}^{*}\).
(2) \(E^{*} = E^{*}_{2},\mbox{or }E^{*}_{3}\)
When \(E^{*} = E^{*}_{2}, \mbox{or }E^{*}_{3}\), the coefficients of Eq. (25) are \(\alpha _{1}=12ac\), \(\alpha_{2}=2aca\), \(\beta_{1}=2ac\). Under condition (H_{1}), Eq. (25) has at least one positive real root, so \(E^{*}_{2}\) and \(E^{*}_{3}\) are unstable equilibria.
From above, we have obtained the conditions under which \(E_{1}^{*}\) undergoes Hopf bifurcation at \(\tau=\tau_{0}\). Now, we will derive the explicit formulae determining the direction and the stability of the periodic solutions bifurcating from the equilibrium \(E_{1}^{*}\). Let \(\tau=\tau_{0}+\mu\), \(t=\tau\bar{t}\) and omit ‘’ above t, we rewrite (4)_{ ε } as
where
A, B are as in (24). We write \(L_{\mu}\phi\) as the form \(L_{\mu}\phi=\int^{0}_{1}\,d\eta ( {\theta,\mu} )\phi(\mu)\), where
\(\delta(\theta) \) is the Dirac delta function. Then Eq. (4)_{ ε } can be written as
where
and
Assume that \(q(\theta)\) is the eigenvector of \(A(0)\) corresponding to \(i\omega_{0} \tau_{0} \), then \(A(0)q(\theta) = i\tau_{0} \omega _{0} q(\theta)\). It follows from the definition of \(A(0)\) that
Thus, we can easily compute \(q(\theta)=(1,\alpha,\beta)e^{i\omega _{0} \tau_{0} \theta}\), where
We can verify that \(q^{*} (\theta) = D(1,\alpha^{*},\beta^{*})e^{i\omega_{0} \tau_{0} \theta} \) is the eigenvector of \(A^{*}\) corresponding to \( i\omega_{0} \tau_{0} \), where
In order to assure the bilinear inner product \(\langle q^{*} (\theta), q(\theta) \rangle = 1\), we have
Therefore, we can choose \(\bar{D}\) as
where \(a_{1}=a\omega^{2} _{0}+a^{2}c^{2}\omega^{2} _{0}\omega^{4}_{0}\), \(a_{2}=2ac\omega ^{3}_{0}\), \(a_{3}=a^{2}c^{2}\omega^{2} _{0}+2ac\tau\omega^{2} _{0}\), \(a_{4}=2ac\omega_{0}+\tau_{0} \omega^{3}_{0}\tau_{0}\omega_{0}a^{2}c^{2}\), \(d_{1}=a_{1}+ba_{3}\cos(\omega_{0} \tau _{0})+ba_{4}\sin(\omega _{0} \tau_{0})\), \(d_{2}=a_{2}+ba_{4}\cos(\omega_{0} \tau_{0})ba_{3}\sin(\omega_{0} \tau_{0})\).
We can get \(\langle q^{*} (s),\bar{q}(\theta) \rangle = 0\).
In what follows, we will obtain the coordinates to describe the center manifold \(C_{0}\) at \(\mu = 0\). Notice that \(u_{t}(\theta)=(x_{t}(\theta),y_{t}(\theta),z_{t}(\theta))^{T}=zq(\theta )+\bar{z}\bar{q}(\theta)+W(t,\theta)\), then we have
Thus, from Eq. (20) we have
then
Thus, we can compute the following values:
which determine the quantities of bifurcating periodic solutions in the center manifold at the critical value \(\tau_{0}\), i.e., \(\mu_{2}\) determines the directions of a Hopf bifurcation: if \(\operatorname{Re} \{\lambda'(\tau_{0})\}>0\), \(\mu_{2}>0 \) (resp. \(\mu_{2}<0\)), then the Hopf bifurcation is supercritical (resp. subcritical) and the periodic solutions exist for \(\tau>\tau_{0}\) (\(\tau<\tau_{0}\)). If \(\operatorname{Re} \{\lambda'(\tau_{0})\}<0\), however, the bifurcating periodic solutions are on the opposite direction. \(\beta_{2}\) determines the stability of the bifurcation periodic solutions: the bifurcating periodic solutions are stable (unstable) if \(\beta_{2}<0\) (\(\beta_{2}>0\)). Furthermore, we can get \(E(0)=\frac{3a^{2}d\tau_{0}\omega^{2}_{0}d_{1}}{d_{1}^{2}+d_{2}^{2}}\), and \(F(0)=\frac{3a^{2}d\tau_{0}\omega^{2}_{0}d_{2}}{d_{1}^{2}+d_{2}^{2}}\). Let \(W=0\), from Eq. (20) and Eq. (22), we have
where \(d_{3}=acd_{1}+\omega_{0}d_{2}\), \(d_{4}=\omega_{0}d_{1}acd_{2}\). Let \(x=\cos\theta\), \(y=\sin\theta\), then
Thus, if \(3a^{2}d\tau_{0}\omega^{2}_{0}d_{1}>0\), then we have \(E(0)>0\) and \(\phi(\theta)\) is easy to be verified to be a Morse function. So, according to Theorem 2, there is a constant \(K_{2}\) such that if \(\vert \varepsilon\frac{F(0)}{E(0)}\vert >K_{2}\), we can get an observable rank one chaos.
Numerical simulations
Now we move to the parameters for which rank one attractors are observable. We consider the following system:
From the discussion of Section 4, we have \(\omega_{0}\doteq0.8805\), \(\tau_{0}\doteq0.04\), \(\operatorname{Re}\{\lambda'{(0)}\}\doteq1.2968\), \(\operatorname{Re} \{c_{1}{(0)}\}\doteq0.0024\), \(\mu_{2}\doteq0.0018\), \(\beta_{2}\doteq0.0047\), \(T_{2}\doteq3.6421 \), so we know that the equilibrium \(E_{1}^{*}\) is asymptotically stable when \(\varepsilon=0\) and \(\tau\in{[0,0.04)}\) (see Figure 1). Further, we know that the bifurcation is supercritical and the stable periodic solution emerges from the equilibrium \(E_{1}^{*}\) (see Figure 2).
We also get \(E(0)\doteq0.0024>0\), \(\frac{F(0)}{E(0)}\doteq59.7693\). We choose T in interval \((69,73) \), which is quite ‘large’ to afford a long relaxation period between consecutive kicks of the external force, and choose ε in \((0, 1)\). In Figure 3, we present a rank one strange attractor at \((\tau,\varepsilon,T)=(0.04,0.55,69.3)\). In Figure 4, a rank one strange attractor at \((\tau,\varepsilon,T)=(0.04,0.55,72.3)\) is shown. In Figure 5, the largest Lyapunov exponents λ versus ε for system (41) with \(T=69.3\) and \(T=72.3\) are given. The results of our numerical simulations are in perfect agreement with the predictions of the rank one theory in Section 3.
Conclusions
We have developed rank one theory from an ordinary differential equation to a timedelayed system and considered the existence of rank one chaos in timedelayed Chua’s system. It is shown that rank one strange attractors occur when the delayed system under a periodic kick undergoes supercritical Hopf bifurcation. We also show some results of numerical simulations to support the rank one theory.
References
 1.
Wang, Q, Oksasoglu, A: Strange attractors with one direction of instability. Commun. Math. Phys. 218, 197 (2001)
 2.
Wang, Q, Young, L: Toward a theory of rank one attractors. Ann. Math. 167(2), 349480 (2008)
 3.
Chen, F, Han, M: Rank one chaos in a class of planar systems with heteroclinic cycle. Chaos 19(4), 043122 (2009)
 4.
Fang, H: Synchronization of two rankone chaotic systems without and with delay via linear delayed feedback control. J. Appl. Math. 2012, Article ID 325131 (2012)
 5.
Jackson, L, Lindgren, A, Kim, Y: A chaotic attractor from Chua’s circuit. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 31(12), 10551058 (1984)
 6.
Wang, X, Zhong, G, Tang, K, et al.: Generating chaos in Chua’s circuit via timedelay feedback. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl. 48(9), 11511156 (2001)
 7.
Wang, Q, Oksasoglu, A: Strange attractors in periodically kicked Chua’s circuit. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 15(1), 8398 (2005)
 8.
Young, L: What are SRB measures, and which systems have them? J. Stat. Phys. 108, 733754 (2002)
 9.
Wang, Q, Oksasoglu, A: Rank one chaos: theory and applications. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 185, 12611319 (2008)
 10.
Hassard, B, Kazarinoff, D, Wan, Y: Theory and Applications of Hopf Bifurcation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
 11.
Ruan, S, Wei, J: On the zeros of transcendental functions with applications to stability of delay differential equations with two delays. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst., Ser. A Math. Anal. 10, 863874 (2003)
 12.
Chow, S, Hale, J: Methods of Bifurcation Theory. Springer, Berlin (1981)
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11061016, 11461036).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, W., Lin, Y., Dai, Y. et al. Rank one strange attractors in periodically kicked Chua’s system with time delay. Adv Differ Equ 2015, 75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201503977
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 rank one strange attractors
 timedelayed system
 periodically kicked
 Chua’s circuit