Skip to main content

Existence of positive solutions for boundary value problems of p-Laplacian difference equations

Abstract

In this paper, by using the Avery-Peterson fixed point theorem, we investigate the existence of at least three positive solutions for a third order p-Laplacian difference equation. An example is given to illustrate our main results.

MSC:34B10, 34B15, 34J10.

1 Introduction

The aim of this paper is to study the existence of positive solutions for a third order p-Laplacian difference equation

{ Δ [ ϕ p ( Δ 2 y ( n ) ) ] + q ( n ) f ( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) = 0 , n [ 0 , N ] , a y ( 0 ) b Δ y ( 0 ) = 0 , c y ( N + 3 ) + d Δ y ( N + 2 ) = 0 , Δ 2 y ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(1.1)

where

  • N>1 an integer;

  • a,c>0, and b,d0 with ad+ac(N+3)+bc>0;

  • f and q are continuous and positive;

  • ϕ p is called p-Laplacian, ϕ p (x)= | x | p 2 x with p>1, its inverse function is denoted by ϕ q (x) with ϕ q (x)= | x | q 2 x with 1/p+1/q=1;

  • i = r s x(i)=0 if r,sZ and s<r, where is the integer set, denote [r,s]={r,r+1,,s} for r,sZ with rs.

Difference equations, the discrete analog of differential equations, have been widely used in many fields such as computer science, economics, neural network, ecology, cybernetics, etc. [1]. In the past decade, the existence of positive solutions for the boundary value problems (BVPs) of the difference equations has been extensively studied; to mention a few references, see [113] and the references therein. Also there has been much interest shown in obtaining the existence of positive solutions for the third order p-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales. To mention a few papers along these lines, see [1418].

We now discuss briefly several of the appropriate papers on the topic.

Liu [10] studied the following second order p-Laplacian difference equation with multi-point boundary conditions:

{ Δ [ ϕ ( Δ x ( n ) ) ] + f ( n , x ( n + 1 ) , Δ x ( n ) , Δ x ( n + 1 ) ) = 0 , n [ 0 , N ] , x ( 0 ) i = 1 m α i x ( η i ) = A , x ( N + 2 ) β i x ( η i ) = B .

The sufficient conditions to guarantee the existence of at least three positive solutions of the above multi-point boundary value problem were established by using a new fixed point theorem obtained in [19].

Liu [12] studied the following boundary value problem:

{ Δ [ ϕ ( Δ x ( n ) ) ] + f ( n , x ( n + 1 ) , Δ x ( n ) , Δ x ( n + 1 ) ) = 0 , n [ 0 , N ] , x ( 0 ) i = 1 m α i x ( η i ) = 0 , x ( N + 2 ) β i x ( η i ) = B .

By using the five functionals fixed point theorem [20], Liu obtained the existence criteria of at least three positive solutions.

Therefore, in this paper, we will consider the existence of at least three positive solutions for the third order p-Laplacian difference equation (1.1) by using the Avery-Peterson fixed point theorem [3].

Throughout this paper we assume that the following condition holds:

(C1) f:[0,N]×[0,+)×R(0,+) and q:[0,N](0,+) are continuous.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminary lemmas which are key tools for our proof. The main result is given in Section 3. Finally, in Section 4, we give an example to demonstrate our result.

2 Preliminaries

In this section we present some lemmas, which will be needed in the proof of the main result.

Let γ and θ be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on P, α be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P and ψ be a nonnegative continuous functional on P. Then for positive real numbers t, v, w, and z, we define the following convex sets of P:

P ( γ , z ) = { y P : γ ( y ) < z } , P ( α , v ; γ , z ) = { y P : v α ( y ) , γ ( y ) z } , P ( α , v ; θ , w ; γ , z ) = { y P : v α ( y ) , θ ( y ) w , γ ( y ) z } ,

and a closed set

R(ψ,t;γ,z)= { y P : t ψ ( y ) , γ ( y ) z } .

The following fixed point theorem is fundamental and important to the proof of our main result.

Lemma 2.1 ([3])

Let B be a real Banach space and PB be a cone in B. Let γ, θ be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on P, let α be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P, and let ψ be a nonnegative continuous functional on P satisfying ψ(λy)λψ(y) for all 0λ1, such that for some positive numbers z and M,

α(y)ψ(y),yMγ(y),for all y P ( γ , z ) ¯ .

Suppose that T: P ( γ , z ) ¯ P ( γ , z ) ¯ is completely continuous and there exist positive numbers t, v, and w with 0<t<v<w such that

  1. (i)

    {yP(α,v;θ,w;γ,z)|α(y)>v} and α(Ty)>v for yP(α,v;θ,w;γ,z);

  2. (ii)

    α(Ty)>v for yP(α,v;γ,z) with θ(Ty)>w;

  3. (iii)

    0R(ψ,t;γ,z) and ψ(Ty)<t for yR(ψ,t;γ,z) with ψ(y)=t.

Then T has at least three fixed points y 1 , y 2 , y 3 P ( γ , z ) ¯ such that

γ( y i )z,i=1,2,3,v<α( y 1 ),t<ψ( y 2 )with α( y 2 )<v and ψ( y 3 )<t.

Let h(n) (n[0,N]) be a positive sequence. Consider the following BVP:

{ Δ [ ϕ p ( Δ 2 y ( n ) ) ] + h ( n ) = 0 , n [ 0 , N ] , a y ( 0 ) b Δ y ( 0 ) = 0 , c y ( N + 3 ) + d Δ y ( N + 2 ) = 0 , Δ 2 y ( 0 ) = 0 .
(2.1)

Lemma 2.2 If y is a solution of BVP (2.1), then there exists unique n 0 [0,N+1] such that Δy( n 0 )>0 and Δy( n 0 +1)0.

Proof Suppose y satisfies (2.1). It follows that

y(n)=y(0)+nΔy(0) r = 0 n 1 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ,n[0,N+3].
(2.2)

The BCs in (2.1) imply that

ay(0)=bΔy(0)

and

cy(0)+c(N+3)Δy(0)c r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) +dΔy(0)d i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) =0.

It follows that

y(0)= b a Δy(0)

and

Δy(0)= a a d + a c ( N + 3 ) + b c ( c r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) + d i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ) .

Similarly, we get

y ( n ) = y ( N + 3 ) ( N + 3 n ) Δ y ( N + 2 ) r = n N + 2 i = r N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , n [ 0 , N + 3 ] .
(2.3)

The BCs in (2.1) imply that

y(N+3)= d c Δy(N+2)

and

Δ y ( N + 2 ) = c a d + a c ( N + 3 ) + b c ( a r = 0 N + 2 i = r N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) + b i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ) .

Since a,b0, and c,d>0 with ad+ac(N+3)+bc>0 and h(n) a positive sequence, one can easily see that Δy(0)>0 and Δy(N+2)0. It follows from Δy(0)>0, Δy(N+2)0, and the fact that Δy(n) is decreasing on [0,N+2] that there exists unique n 0 [0,N+1] such that Δy( n 0 )>0 and Δy( n 0 +1)0. The proof is complete. □

Lemma 2.3 If y is a solution of BVP (2.1), then y(0)0, y(N+3)0, and y(n)>0 for all n[1,N+2].

Proof We get from Lemma 2.2 the result that there exists unique n 0 [0,N] such that Δy( n 0 )>0 and Δy( n 0 +1)0. It follows from (2.1) that

Δy(n)= { Δ y ( n 0 + 1 ) i = n 0 + 1 n 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , n [ n 0 + 1 , N + 2 ] , Δ y ( n 0 ) + i = n n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , n [ 0 , n 0 ] .

Then

y(n)= { y ( N + 3 ) ( N + 3 n ) Δ y ( n 0 + 1 ) + r = n N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , n [ n 0 + 1 , N + 3 ] , y ( 0 ) + n Δ y ( n 0 ) + r = 0 n 1 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , n [ 0 , n 0 + 1 ] ,

with

y ( n 0 + 1 ) = y ( 0 ) + ( n 0 + 1 ) Δ y ( n 0 ) + r = 0 n 0 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) = y ( N + 3 ) ( N + 2 n 0 ) Δ y ( n 0 + 1 ) r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

It follows from h(n) being positive, Δy( n 0 )>0, and Δy( n 0 +1)0 that

y(n)> { y ( N + 3 ) , n [ n 0 + 1 , N + 2 ] , y ( 0 ) , n [ 1 , n 0 + 1 ] .

So y(n)min{y(0),y(N+3)} for all n[0,N+3]. From BCs in BVP (2.1), we get

a y ( 0 ) = b Δ y ( 0 ) 0 , c y ( N + 3 ) = d Δ y ( N + 2 ) 0 .

Then

min { y ( 0 ) , y ( N + 3 ) } 0.

Hence y(n)>0 for all n[1,N+2]. The proof is complete. □

Lemma 2.4 If y is a solution of BVP (2.1), then

y(n) σ n max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n)for all n[0,N+3],
(2.4)

where σ n =min{ n N + 3 , N + 3 n N + 3 }.

Proof It follows from Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.3 that y(n)0 for n[0,N+3]. Suppose that y( n 0 )=max{y(n):n[0,N+3]}. Since Δy(0)>0 and Δy(N+1)0, we get n 0 [1,N+1]. For n[1, n 0 ], it is easy to see that

y ( n 0 ) y ( 0 ) n 0 n + y ( 0 ) y ( n ) = n s = 0 n 0 1 Δ y ( s ) n 0 s = 0 n 1 Δ y ( s ) n 0 = ( n 0 n ) s = 0 n 1 Δ y ( s ) + n s = n n 0 1 Δ y ( s ) n 0 .

Since Δ 2 y(n)= ϕ q ( s = 0 n 1 h(s))<0 for all n[0,N+1], we get Δy(s)Δy(j) for all sj. Then ( n 0 n) s = 0 n 1 Δy(s)+n s = n n 0 1 Δy(s)0. It follows that y ( n 0 ) y ( 0 ) n 0 n+y(0)y(n)0. Then

y(n) n n 0 y( n 0 )+ ( 1 n n 0 ) y(0) n N + 3 max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n)for all n[1, n 0 ].

Similarly, if n[ n 0 ,N+2], we get

y(n) N + 3 n N + 3 max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n)for all n[ n 0 ,N+2].

Then

y(n)min { n N + 3 , N + 3 n N + 3 } max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n)for all n[0,N+3].

 □

Lemma 2.5 If y is a solution of BVP (2.1), then

y(n)= b + n a a A h r = 0 n 1 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ,
(2.5)

where A h satisfies the equation

A h = a a d + a c ( N + 3 ) + b c ( c r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) + d i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ) .

Proof The proof follows from Lemma 2.2 and is omitted. □

Lemma 2.6 If y is a solution of BVP (2.1), then there exists an n 0 [0,N] such that

max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) = y ( n 0 + 1 ) max { r = 0 n 0 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) } .

Proof It follows from Lemma 2.2 that there is n 0 [0,N+1] such that Δy( n 0 )>0 and Δy( n 0 +1)0, Δy(n)>0 for all n[0, n 0 ] and Δy(n)0 for all n[ n 0 +1,N+2]. Then

max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n)=y( n 0 +1),

there exists ξ( n 0 , n 0 +1] such that

Δ y ( n 0 + 1 ) Δ y ( n 0 ) n 0 + 1 n 0 = 0 Δ y ( n 0 ) ξ n 0 .

Then

Δy( n 0 +1)= n 0 + 1 ξ ξ n 0 Δy( n 0 ).
(2.6)

It is easy to see from (2.1) that

0<Δy( n 0 )= A h i = 0 n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ,
(2.7)
0Δy( n 0 +1)= A h i = 0 n 0 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .
(2.8)

Here A h =Δy(0). So (2.6)-(2.8) imply that

A h i = 0 n 0 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) = n 0 + 1 ξ ξ n 0 A h + n 0 + 1 ξ ξ n 0 i = 0 n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

Then

A h =( n 0 +1ξ) i = 0 n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) +(ξ n 0 ) i = 0 n 0 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

We get

i = 0 n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) A h i = 0 n 0 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .
(2.9)

Lemma 2.3 implies that B h =y(0)0. Furthermore, one has from (2.6)

y ( n 0 + 1 ) = B h + ( n 0 + 1 ) A h r = 0 n 0 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) r = 0 n 0 i = 0 n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) r = 0 n 0 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) = r = 0 n 0 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

On the other hand, by a discussion similar to Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.3, we have A ¯ h =Δy(N+2), B ¯ h =y(N+3) with

Δy(n)= A ¯ h + i = n N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) )

and

y(n)= B ¯ h (N+3n) A ¯ h r = n N + 2 i = r N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

It follows that

Δ y ( n 0 ) = A ¯ h + i = n 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) > 0 , Δ y ( n 0 + 1 ) = A ¯ h + i = n 0 + 1 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) 0 .

So

A ¯ h + i = n 0 + 1 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) = n 0 + 1 ξ ξ n 0 A ¯ h n 0 + 1 ξ ξ n 0 i = n 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

Then

A ¯ h =(ξ n 0 ) i = n 0 + 1 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ( n 0 +1ξ) i = n 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

We get

i = n 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) A ¯ h i = n 0 + 1 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

One has from Lemma 2.3 B ¯ h =y(N+3)0. Therefore

y ( n 0 + 1 ) = B ¯ h ( N + 2 n 0 ) A ¯ h r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) ( N + 2 n 0 ) i = n 0 + 1 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = r N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) = r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) .

Hence

max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) = y ( n 0 + 1 ) max { r = 0 n 0 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) , r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 h ( s ) ) } .

 □

Let h(n)=q(n)f(n,y(n),Δy(n)). Then A y satisfies the following equation:

A y = a a d + a c ( N + 3 ) + b c ( c r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) + d i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) ) .

Let B= R N + 4 . We call xy for x,yB if x(n)y(n) for all n[0,N+3].

Define the norm

y=max { max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) , max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | } .

It is easy to see that B is a semi-ordered real Banach space.

Choose

P= { y B : y ( n ) σ n max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n )  for all  n [ 0 , N + 3 ] , Δ 2 y ( n ) 0  for  n [ 0 , N + 1 ] , a y ( 0 ) b Δ y ( 0 ) = 0 } ,
(2.10)

where σ n =min{ n N + 3 , N + 3 n N + 3 }. Then P is a cone in B.

Define the operator T:PB by

(Ty)(n)= b + n a a A y r = 0 n 1 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) ,

for yP, n[0,N+3]. Then

( T y ) ( n ) = b + n a a d + a c ( N + 3 ) + b c ( c r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) + d i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) ) r = 0 n 1 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) .

Lemma 2.7 Suppose that (C1) holds. Then

  1. (i)

    Ty satisfies the following:

    { Δ [ ϕ p ( Δ 2 ( T y ) ( n ) ) ] + q ( n ) f ( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) = 0 , 0 < n < N , a ( T y ) ( 0 ) b Δ ( T y ) ( 0 ) = 0 , c ( T y ) ( N + 3 ) + d Δ ( T y ) ( N + 2 ) = 0 , Δ 2 ( T y ) ( 0 ) = 0 .
    (2.11)
  2. (ii)

    TyP for each yP.

  3. (iii)

    y is a solution of BVP (1.1) if and only if y is a solution of the operator equation y=Ty.

  4. (iv)

    T:PP is completely continuous.

Proof

  1. (i)

    By the definition of Ty, we get (2.11).

  2. (ii)

    Note the definition of P. Since (C1) holds, for yP, (2.11), Lemma 2.2, Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4 imply that Δ(Ty)(n) is decreasing on [0,N+2] and (Ty)(n) σ n max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] (Ty)(n) for all n[0,N+3]. Together with (2.11), it follows that TyP.

  3. (iii)

    It is easy to see from (2.11) that y is a solution of BVP (1.1) if and only if y is a solution of the operator equation y=Ty.

  4. (iv)

    It suffices to prove that T is continuous on P and T is relative compact.

We divide the proof into three steps:

Step 1. For each bounded subset DP, prove that A y is bounded in for y D ¯

Denote

L 1 =max { max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) , max n [ 0 , N + 1 ] | Δ y ( n ) | : x D ¯ }

and

L 2 = max j [ 0 , N ] f L 1 (j)= max j [ 0 , N ] max u , | x | L 1 q(j)f(j,u,x).

It follows from (2.9) in the proof of Lemma 2.6 that

0 A y i = 0 N ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) (N+1) ϕ q (N L 2 ).

Hence A y is bounded in .

Step 2. For each bounded subset DP, and each y 0 D, it is easy to prove that T is continuous at y 0 .

Step 3. For each bounded subset DP, prove that T is relative compact on D.

In fact, for each bounded subset ΩD and yΩ. Suppose

y=max { max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) , max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | } < M 1 ,

and Step 1 implies that there exists a constant M 2 >0 such that A y < M 2 . Then

( T y ) ( n ) = b + n a a A y r = 0 n 1 i = 0 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) b + n a a M 2 + r = 0 N + 2 i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 N q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) b + ( N + 3 ) a a M 2 + ( N + 3 ) ( N + 2 ) ϕ q ( s = 0 N f M 1 ( s ) ) : = M 3 ,

where f M 1 (s)= max u M 1 , | x | M 1 q(j)f(s,u,x). Similarly, one has

| Δ ( T y ) ( n ) | = | A y i = 0 n 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) | M 2 + i = 0 N + 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 N f M 1 ( s ) ) = M 2 + ( N + 2 ) ϕ q ( s = 0 N f M 1 ( s ) ) : = M 4 .

It follows that T Ω is bounded. Since B= R N + 4 , one knows that T Ω is relative compact. Steps 1, 2, and 3 imply that T is completely continuous. □

3 Main result

In this section, our objective is to establish the existence of at least three positive solutions for BVP (1.1) by using the Avery-Peterson fixed point theorem [3].

Choose [ N + 3 2 ]>k>0, where [x] denotes the largest integer not greater than x, and denote σ k =min{ k N + 3 , N + 3 k N + 3 }.

Define the functionals on P:P[0,+) by

γ ( y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | , θ ( y ) = ψ ( y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) , α ( y ) = min n [ k , N + 3 k ] y ( n ) .

For yP and n[0,N+3] we have

y ( n ) = y ( n ) y ( 0 ) + y ( 0 ) | i = 0 n 1 Δ y ( i ) | + y ( 0 ) = | i = 0 n 1 Δ y ( i ) | + b a Δ y ( 0 ) | i = 0 N + 2 Δ y ( i ) | + b a Δ y ( 0 ) ( N + 3 + b a ) max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | ,

i.e.,

max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y(n) ( N + 3 + b a ) max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] |Δy(n)|.
(3.1)

So,

y = max { max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) , max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | } ( N + 3 + b a ) max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | .

Hence, we obtain

y ( N + 3 + b a ) γ(y),yP.
(3.2)

Let

Ω = 2 i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) ) , Λ = σ k min { r = k [ N + 3 2 ] i = r [ N + 3 2 ] 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) ) , r = [ N + 3 2 ] N + 3 k i = [ N + 3 2 ] r 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) ) } .

Theorem 3.1 Suppose that (C1) holds. If there are positive numbers

t<v< v σ k <zwith Ωv<Λz,

such that the following conditions are satisfied:

(C2) f(n,y(n),Δy(n)) ϕ p ( z Ω ) for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[0,N+3]×[0,(N+3+ b a )z]×[z,z];

(C3) f(n,y(n),Δy(n))> ϕ p ( v Λ ) for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[k,N+3k]×[v, v σ k ]×[z,z];

(C4) f(n,y(n),Δy(n))< a ( N + 3 ) a + b ϕ p ( t Ω ) for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[0,N+3]×[0,t]×[z,z],

then BVP (1.1) has at least three positive solutions.

Proof We choose positive numbers t, v, w= v σ k , z with t<v< v σ k <z, ϕ p ( v Λ )min{ ϕ p ( z Ω ), a ( N + 3 ) a + b ϕ p ( t Ω )}. Next we show that all the conditions of Lemma 2.1 are satisfied.

It is clear that for yP and λ[0,1], there are α(y)ψ(y), ψ(λy)=λψ(y). From (3.2), we have y(N+3+ b a )γ(y). Furthermore, ψ(0)=0<t and therefore 0R(ψ,t;γ,z).

Now the proof is divided into four steps.

Step 1. We will show that (C2) implies that

T: P ( γ , z ) ¯ P ( γ , z ) ¯ .

For y P ( γ , z ) ¯ , we have γ(y)= max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] |Δy(n)|z. From (3.2) we get

( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) [0,N+3]× [ 0 , ( N + 3 + b a ) z ] ×[z,z].

This implies that (C2) holds. Then one has from (C2) and (2.9) in the proof of Lemma 2.6

γ ( T y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ ( T y ) ( n ) | = max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | A y i = 0 n 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) | max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) + i = 0 n 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) | 2 i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) 2 z Ω i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) ) = z .

Therefore, T: P ( γ , z ) ¯ P ( γ , z ) ¯ . Hence, by Lemma 2.7, we know that T: P ( γ , z ) ¯ P ( γ , z ) ¯ is completely continuous.

Step 2. We show that condition (i) in Lemma 2.1 holds.

Choose y(n)= v σ k =w for all n[0,N+3]. It is easy to see that

α ( y ) = min n [ k , N + 3 k ] y ( n ) = v σ k > v , θ ( y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] y ( n ) = v σ k = w , γ ( y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ y ( n ) | = 0 < z ,

since σ k =min{ k N + 3 , N + 3 k N + 3 }< 1 2 . Hence {yP(α,v;θ,w;γ,z)|α(y)>v}.

For yP(α,v;θ,w;γ,z), we have vy(n) v σ k and zΔy(n)z for n[k,N+3k].

It follows from (C3) that

f ( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) > ϕ p ( v Λ ) , ( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) [k,N+3k]× [ v , v σ k ] ×[z,z].

Similarly to Lemma 2.6 there exists n 0 [k,N+3k] such that Δy( n 0 )>0 and Δy( n 0 +1)0 and

max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] (Ty)(n)=(Ty)( n 0 +1)max { ( T y ) ( n 0 ) , ( T y ) ( n 0 + 2 ) } ,

we get from (2.4), (C1), (C3), and Lemma 2.6

α ( T y ) = min n [ k , N + 3 k ] ( T y ) ( n ) σ k max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] ( T y ) ( n ) = σ k ( T y ) ( n 0 ) σ k max { r = 0 n 0 i = r n 0 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) , r = n 0 + 1 N + 2 i = n 0 + 1 r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) } σ k max { r = 0 [ N + 3 2 ] i = r [ N + 3 2 ] 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) , r = [ N + 3 2 ] N + 2 i = [ N + 3 2 ] r 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) } σ k min { r = k [ N + 3 2 ] i = r [ N + 3 2 ] 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) , r = [ N + 3 2 ] N + 2 i = [ N + 3 2 ] r 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) } v σ k Λ min { r = k [ N + 3 2 ] i = r [ N + 3 2 ] 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) ) , r = [ N + 3 2 ] N + 3 k i = [ N + 3 2 ] r 1 ϕ q ( s = k i 1 q ( s ) ) } = v .

We conclude that condition (i) of Lemma 2.1 holds.

Step 3. We prove that condition (ii) of Lemma 2.1 holds. If yP(α,v;γ,z) and θ(Ty)>w= v σ k , then we have

α(Ty)= min n [ k , N + 3 k ] (Ty)(n) σ k max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] (Ty)(n)= σ k θ(Ty)>v.

Then condition (ii) of Lemma 2.1 is satisfied.

Step 4. Finally, we verify that (iii) of Lemma 2.1 also holds. Clearly, 0R(ψ,t;γ,z). Suppose that yR(ψ,t;γ,z) with ψ(y)=t. Then by condition (C4) and (3.1), we obtain

ψ ( T y ) = max n [ 0 , N + 3 ] ( T y ) ( n ) ( N + 3 + b a ) max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | Δ ( T y ) ( n ) | = ( N + 3 + b a ) max n [ 0 , N + 2 ] | A y i = 0 n 1 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) | ( N + 3 + b a ) 2 i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) f ( s , y ( s ) , Δ y ( s ) ) ) < ( N + 3 + b a ) ( a ( N + 3 ) a + b ) 2 t Ω i = 0 N + 2 ϕ q ( s = 0 i 1 q ( s ) ) = t .

Thus, condition (iii) of Lemma 2.1 is satisfied.

From Steps 1-4 together with Lemma 2.1 we find that the operator T has at least three fixed points which are positive solutions y 1 , y 2 , and y 3 belonging to P ( γ , z ) ¯ of (1.1) such that

γ( y i )z,i=1,2,3,v<α( y 1 ),t<ψ( y 2 )with α( y 2 )<v,ψ( y 3 )<t.

 □

4 An example

Example 4.1 Consider the following BVP:

{ Δ 3 y ( n ) + f ( n , y ( n ) , Δ y ( n ) ) = 0 , n [ 0 , 99 ] , 2 y ( 0 ) Δ y ( 0 ) = 0 , 2 y ( 102 ) + Δ y ( 101 ) = 0 , Δ 2 y ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(4.1)

where f(n,y(n),Δy(n)) is continuous and positive for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[0,N]×[0,+)×R. Corresponding to BVP (1.1), we have N=99, p=2, q(n)=1, n[0,N], a=c=2, b=d=1, ϕ 2 (y)=y.

It is easy to see that (C1) holds.

Choose the constant k=49, then σ 49 =min{ 49 102 , 53 102 }= 49 102 , Ω=10,302, Λ= 49 51 . Taking t=10, v=50, and z=600,000, it is easy to check that

10=t<v=50< v σ 49 = 5 , 100 49 <600,000,Ωv=515,100<Λz=576,470.5882.

If

f(n,y(n),Δy(n)) 300 , 000 5 , 151 , for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[0,102]×[0,62,400,000]×[600,000,600,000];

f(n,y(n),Δy(n))> 2 , 550 49 for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[49,53]×[50, 5 , 100 49 ]×[600,000,600,000];

f(n,y(n),Δy(n))< 5 535 , 704 , for all (n,y(n),Δy(n))[0,102]×[0,10]×[600,000,600,000],

then Theorem 3.1 implies that BVP (4.1) has at least three positive solutions such that

max n [ 0 , 101 ] | Δ y i ( n ) | 600 , 000 , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 50 < min n [ 49 , 53 ] y 1 ( n ) , 10 < max n [ 0 , 102 ] y 2 ( n ) with  min n [ 49 , 53 ] y 2 ( n ) < 50  and  max n [ 0 , 102 ] y 3 ( n ) < 10 .

References

  1. 1.

    Anderson DR: Discrete third-order three-point right-focal boundary value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2003, 45: 861-871. 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)80157-8

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson D, Avery RI: Multiple positive solutions to a third-order discrete focal boundary value problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 2001, 42: 333-340. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00158-4

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Avery RI, Peterson AC: Three positive fixed points of nonlinear operators on ordered Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2001, 42: 313-322. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00156-0

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Aykut N: Existence of positive solutions for boundary value problems of second-order functional difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 48: 517-527. 10.1016/j.camwa.2003.10.007

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cai X, Yu J: Existence theorems for second-order discrete boundary value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 320: 649-661. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.07.029

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cheung W-S, Ren J, Wong PJY, Zhao D: Multiple positive solutions for discrete nonlocal boundary value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 330: 900-915. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.034

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Graef JR, Henderson J: Double solutions of boundary value problems for 2 m th-order differential equations and difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2003, 45: 873-885. 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00063-4

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    He Z: On the existence of positive solutions of p -Laplacian difference equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2003, 161: 193-201. 10.1016/j.cam.2003.08.004

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yaslan Karaca I: Discrete third-order three-point boundary value problem. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2007, 205: 458-468. 10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.030

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu Y: Existence results for positive solutions of non-homogeneous BVPs for second order difference equations with one-dimensional p -Laplacian. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2010, 47: 135-163. 10.4134/JKMS.2010.47.1.135

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xia J, Debnath L, Jiang H, Liu Y: Three positive solutions of Sturm-Liouville type multi-point BVPs for second order p-Laplacian difference equations. Bull. Pure Appl. Math. 2010, 4: 266-287.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu Y: Studies on nonhomogeneous multi-point BVPs of difference equations with one-dimensional p -Laplacian. Mediterr. J. Math. 2011, 8: 577-602. 10.1007/s00009-010-0089-1

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xia J, Liu Y: Positive solutions of BVPs for infinite difference equations with one-dimensional p -Laplacian. Miskolc Math. Notes 2012, 13: 149-176.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bian L-H, He X-P, Sun H-R: Multiple positive solutions of m -point BVPs for third-order p -Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2009., 2009: Article ID 262857

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xu F, Meng Z: The existence of positive solutions for third-order p -Laplacian m -point boundary value problems with sign changing nonlinearity on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2009., 2009: Article ID 169321

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Han W, Liu M: Existence and uniqueness of a nontrivial solution for a class of third-order nonlinear p -Laplacian m -point eigenvalue problems on time scales. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70(5):1877-1889. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.088

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wu LM, Yang J: Positive solutions to third-order nonlinear p -Laplacian functional dynamic equations on time scales. J. Lanzhou Univ. Nat. Sci. 2010, 46(6):100-104.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Song C, Gao X: Positive solutions for third-order p -Laplacian functional dynamic equations on time scales. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 585378

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bai Z, Ge W: Existence of three positive solutions for some second-order boundary value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 48: 699-707. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.03.002

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Avery RI: A generalization of the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem. Math. Sci. Res. Hot-Line 1999, 3: 9-14.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma T Fen.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and typed, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fen, F.T., Karaca, I.Y. Existence of positive solutions for boundary value problems of p-Laplacian difference equations. Adv Differ Equ 2014, 263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-263

Download citation

Keywords

  • positive solutions
  • fixed point theorem
  • p-Laplacian difference equation
  • boundary value problem