# The operational matrix formulation of the Jacobi tau approximation for space fractional diffusion equation

- Eid H Doha
^{1}, - Ali H Bhrawy
^{2, 3}Email author, - Dumitru Baleanu
^{4, 5, 6}and - Samer S Ezz-Eldien
^{7}

**2014**:231

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-231

© Doha et al.; licensee Springer 2014

**Received: **13 May 2014

**Accepted: **1 July 2014

**Published: **20 August 2014

## Abstract

In this article, an accurate and efficient numerical method is presented for solving the space-fractional order diffusion equation (SFDE). Jacobi polynomials are used to approximate the solution of the equation as a base of the tau spectral method which is based on the Jacobi operational matrices of fractional derivative and integration. The main advantage of this method is based upon reducing the nonlinear partial differential equation into a system of algebraic equations in the expansion coefficient of the solution. In order to test the accuracy and efficiency of our method, the solutions of the examples presented are introduced in the form of tables to make a comparison with those obtained by other methods and with the exact solutions easy.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction

Due to their accuracy, fractional partial differential equations (PDEs) in the description of nonlinear phenomena in engineering, physics, viscoelasticity, fluid mechanics, biology, and other areas of science have got a lot of attention in recent years [1–3]. There are many advantages of fractional derivatives, one of them is that it can be seen as a set of ordinary derivatives that give the fractional derivatives the ability to describe what integer-order derivatives cannot [4]. One may refer for the historical development of fractional operators to [5, 6].

The tau spectral method is one of the most important methods that have been used to find numerical solutions of differential equations. Expressing the solution as an expansion of certain orthogonal polynomials and then choosing the coefficients in the expansion in order to satisfy the differential equation as accurately as possible is the main idea of the spectral methods.

In a lot of papers there have been proposals for solving the multi-term fractional differential equations such as the Haar wavelet [7, 8], the homotopy analysis method [9, 10], the Legendre wavelet method [11], the homotopy-perturbation method [12, 13], and the variational iteration method [14]. Spectral methods have been used to introduce approximate solutions for the fractional differential equations based on collocation and tau methods, see [15, 16]. Moreover, spectral methods are applied with the help of the operational matrix of fractional derivatives for numerical approximations of the linear and nonlinear FDEs [17–19], not only the operational matrices of fractional derivatives, but those of fractional integrations are used with the help of the tau and pseudospectral methods to solve some types of FDEs [20–22].

The use of general Jacobi polynomials has the advantage of obtaining the solutions in terms of the Jacobi parameters *α* and *β*. Hence to generalize and instead of developing approximation results for each particular pair of indices, it would be very useful to carry out a systematic study on Jacobi polynomials ($\alpha ,\beta >-1$) with general indices, which can then be directly applied to other applications. It is with this motivation that we introduce in this paper a family of Jacobi polynomials with indices $\alpha ,\beta >-1$.

The operational matrix was presented for fractional derivatives of shifted Jacobi polynomials by Doha *et al.* [23] and used with the help of the spectral tau method to introduce numerical solutions of FDEs. Recently, spectral methods are used together with the shifted Jacobi polynomials for investigating numerical approximations of linear and nonlinear FDEs with constant and variable coefficients in [24].

During the past few decades fractional order partial differential equations began to play a key role especially in the study and modeling of anomalies and complex systems [2, 25–29]. SFDEs model phenomena exhibiting anomalous diffusion that cannot be modeled accurately by the classical diffusion equations. Because of the nonlocal property of fractional differential operators, the numerical methods for SFDEs often generate dense or even full coefficient matrices. Numerical approaches to different types of fractional diffusion models have been increasingly appearing in the literature [30–35]. Spectral methods are applied together with the finite difference method [36] in order to find an approximate solution of SFDEs; see [30]. Bhrawy and Baleanu [37] proposed the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto collocation scheme for solving the SFDEs with variable coefficients. Recently, Saadatmandi and Dehghan [38] and Doha *et al.* [39] applied the operational matrix of fractional derivatives with the help of tau approximations based on Legendre polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials for numerical solutions of SFDEs, respectively.

In this paper we are concerned with the direct solution techniques for the numerical solution of SFDEs, using the Jacobi tau approximations. Developing an efficient algorithm using the tau method together with operational matrices of a fractional derivative and integration of shifted Jacobi polynomials is our main aim. The shifted Jacobi tau method based on Jacobi operational matrices reduces SFDEs to a system of algebraic equations, which simplifies the problem. We note that the improved operational matrix techniques based on the Legendre tau method [38], the Chebyshev tau method [39], and some other interesting methods can be obtained directly as special cases from our proposed shifted Jacobi operational matrices with Jacobi tau approximations.

The article is arranged in the following way: In Section 2, some properties of Jacobi polynomials and some necessary definitions are introduced. In Section 3, we apply our algorithm for the solution of SFDEs. The error estimate is given in Section 4. In Section 5 several examples have been applied. Also, a conclusion is presented in the final section.

## 2 Basic ideas and definitions

### 2.1 Fractional derivation and integration

The Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional definitions are the two most used definitions of fractional calculus.

**Definition 2.1**The integral of order $\nu \ge 0$ (fractional) according to Riemann-Liouville is given by

is the gamma function.

**Definition 2.2**The Caputo fractional derivatives of order

*ν*is defined as

where *m* is the ceiling function of *ν*.

### 2.2 SFDE

respectively, where $u(x,t)$ represents the solute concentration, $q(x,t)$ is the source term and $f(x)$ is the initial solute concentration but ${g}_{0}(x)$ and ${g}_{1}(x)$ are the boundary solute concentrations.

### 2.3 Properties of shifted Jacobi polynomials

*i*is given by

*C*and the shifted Jacobi vector ${\varphi}_{L,N}(x)$ are given by

**A**is given by

(see [40] for a proof).

*ν*in the Caputo sense and is defined as follows:

Note that in ${\mathbf{D}}^{(\nu )}$, the first $\lceil \nu \rceil $ rows are all zero (see [23] for a proof).

## 3 The numerical scheme

In this section, we apply the spectral tau method together with the shifted Jacobi operational matrix to solve SFDE (5) with initial conditions (6) and boundary conditions (7).

**A**is an unknown $(M+1)\times (N+1)$ matrix, but ${C}^{T}$,

**Q**and

**F**are known matrices which can be written as

where ${c}_{j}$ and ${f}_{j}$ are given as in (10) but the ${q}_{ij}$ are given as in (14).

*t*and using (6), we have

**H**is a $(N+1)\times (N+1)$ matrix. To illustrate

**H**, (24) can be written as

*L*, we obtain

respectively. Equations (31) and (32) are collocated at $(M+1)$ points. For suitable collocation points we use the shifted Jacobi roots ${t}_{i}$, $i=1,2,\dots ,M+1$ of ${P}_{\tau ,M+1}^{(\alpha ,\beta )}(t)$. The number of unknown coefficients ${a}_{ij}$ is equal to $(N+1)(M+1)$ and can be obtained from (30)-(32). Consequently ${u}_{N,M}(x,t)$ given in (20) can be calculated.

## 4 Numerical results

**Example 1** Let us consider (5) with initial condition $u(x,0)={x}^{4}$, $0<x<1$, and boundary conditions $u(0,t)=0$ and $u(1,t)={e}^{-t}$, with $c(x)=\frac{1}{24}\mathrm{\Gamma}(5-\nu ){x}^{\nu}$ and $d(x,t)=-2{e}^{-t}{x}^{4}$; see [31].

The exact solution of the problem is of the form $u(x,t)={e}^{-t}{x}^{4}$.

where $\parallel \cdot \parallel $ is the ${l}_{\mathrm{\infty}}$ norm.

Regarding this problem we study four different choices of *ν*, △*x* and △*t* with $N=M=5$.

*ν*, △

*x*,

*α*,

*β*and △

*t*, and that obtained by Sousa [31]. Also, in Figure 1, we plot the error function at $N=M=8$, $\alpha =\beta =1$, and $\nu =1.6$, while in Figure 2, we show the logarithmic graphs of the maximum absolute errors (MAEs) (Log

_{10}error) at $\alpha =\beta =0$, $\nu =1.2$, and various choices of

*N*($N=M$); by using our algorithm. From these figures, it is shown that the numerical errors decay rapidly as

*N*increased. This confirms that the proposed method has an exponential rate of convergence.

${\mathit{l}}_{\mathbf{\infty}}$
**error at**
$\mathit{N}\mathbf{=}\mathit{M}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$
**for**
$\mathit{\nu}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1.2}\mathbf{,}\mathbf{1.4}$
**and**
$\mathbf{\u25b3}\mathit{x}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{\u25b3}\mathit{t}$
**for Example**
**1**

△x | ν | Sousa [31] | α = β = 0 | α = β = 1 | α = β = 0.5 | α = β = −0.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1/15 | 1.2 | 1.275 × 10 | 2.873 × 10 | 1.739 × 10 | 2.239 × 10 | 3.505 × 10 |

1/20 | 7.571 × 10 | 2.051 × 10 | 1.179 × 10 | 1.552 × 10 | 2.623 × 10 | |

1/25 | 5.030 × 10 | 1.493 × 10 | 8.316 × 10 | 1.111 × 10 | 1.960 × 10 | |

1/30 | 3.566 × 10 | 1.123 × 10 | 6.095 × 10 | 8.247 × 10 | 1.500 × 10 | |

1/15 | 1.4 | 9.070 × 10 | 2.296 × 10 | 1.446 × 10 | 1.833 × 10 | 2.693 × 10 |

1/20 | 5.327 × 10 | 1.635 × 10 | 9.792 × 10 | 1.269 × 10 | 1.993 × 10 | |

1/25 | 3.486 × 10 | 1.191 × 10 | 6.892 × 10 | 9.083 × 10 | 1.486 × 10 | |

1/30 | 2.461 × 10 | 8.971 × 10 | 5.043 × 10 | 6.741 × 10 | 1.138 × 10 |

${\mathit{l}}_{\mathbf{\infty}}$
**error at**
$\mathit{N}\mathbf{=}\mathit{M}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$
**for**
$\mathit{\nu}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1.5}\mathbf{,}\mathbf{1.8}$
**and**
$\mathbf{\u25b3}\mathit{x}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{\u25b3}\mathit{t}$
**for Example**
**1**

△x | ν | Sousa [31] | α = β = 0 | α = β = 1 | α = β = 0.5 | α = β = −0.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1/15 | 1.5 | 7.660 × 10 | 1.686 × 10 | 1.076 × 10 | 1.359 × 10 | 1.952 × 10 |

1/20 | 4.493 × 10 | 1.198 × 10 | 7.257 × 10 | 9.387 × 10 | 1.436 × 10 | |

1/25 | 2.929 × 10 | 8.726 × 10 | 5.081 × 10 | 6.701 × 10 | 1.068 × 10 | |

1/30 | 2.067 × 10 | 6.568 × 10 | 3.697 × 10 | 4.962 × 10 | 8.179 × 10 | |

1/15 | 1.8 | 4.380 × 10 | 2.794 × 10 | 1.744 × 10 | 2.260 × 10 | 3.175 × 10 |

1/20 | 2.540 × 10 | 1.955 × 10 | 1.076 × 10 | 1.502 × 10 | 2.307 × 10 | |

1/25 | 1.649 × 10 | 1.399 × 10 | 6.692 × 10 | 1.020 × 10 | 1.705 × 10 | |

1/30 | 1.150 × 10 | 1.032 × 10 | 4.167 × 10 | 7.111 × 10 | 1.279 × 10 |

In [31], Sousa implemented the Crank-Nicolson discretization in time together with the spline approximations for introducing a solution of this problem and the results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. It is clear from Tables 1 and 2 that the presented method is more accurate than the spline method. Moreover, numerical results that have been obtained in the case of $\alpha =\beta =-\frac{1}{2}$ are entirely consistent with the results presented by Doha *et al.* [39].

**Example 2**Consider the following problem:

*α*and

*β*, while in Figure 3, we plot the error function at $N=M=8$ and $\alpha =\beta =1$. For the sake of comparison, the results obtained by Khader [30] are also introduced in the second column of Table 3. Table 3 confirms that this method is more accurate than the Chebyshev collocation method [30] (see Table 1 in [30]). Results that have been obtained in the case of $\alpha =\beta =0$, are entirely consistent with the results presented by Saadatmandi and Dehghan [38].

**Absolute errors at**
$\mathit{N}\mathbf{=}\mathit{M}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$
**with**
$\mathit{t}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{2}$
**and various choices of**
α
**,**
β
**, for Example**
**2**

x | Khader [30] | α = β = 0 | α = β = 0.5 | α = −β = −0.5 | α = β = 1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 4.2 × 10 | 4.4 × 10 | 1.8 × 10 | 2.5 × 10 | 6.9 × 10 |

0.2 | 3.7 × 10 | 2.7 × 10 | 8.9 × 10 | 1.9 × 10 | 1.8 × 10 |

0.3 | 8.4 × 10 | 5.8 × 10 | 4.8 × 10 | 1.6 × 10 | 5.3 × 10 |

0.4 | 3.2 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 | 8.1 × 10 | 1.5 × 10 | 8.6 × 10 |

0.5 | 3.6 × 10 | 1.1 × 10 | 9.9 × 10 | 2.6 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 |

0.6 | 1.9 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 | 3.0 × 10 | 1.2 × 10 |

0.7 | 2.9 × 10 | 8.5 × 10 | 9.5 × 10 | 2.7 × 10 | 1.1 × 10 |

0.8 | 4.9 × 10 | 6.0 × 10 | 7.8 × 10 | 2.0 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 |

0.9 | 2.8 × 10 | 3.6 × 10 | 5.0 × 10 | 1.1 × 10 | 6.5 × 10 |

In the case where an exact solution is not known, one follows a similar method. The difference is that one calculates the residual errors only, since comparison to an exact solution is not possible.

**Example 3** Consider (5) with the coefficient function, $c(x)=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{\Gamma}(3-\nu ){x}^{\nu}$, and the source function, $q(x,t)=sin(-t){x}^{2}-cos(-t){x}^{2}$, with initial condition $u(x,0)={x}^{2}$, $0<x<1$, and boundary conditions $u(0,t)=0$ and $u(1,t)=cos(-t)$.

The exact solution of the problem is of the form $u(x,t)=cos(-t){x}^{2}$.

*α*, and

*β*. Also in Figure 4, we show the logarithmic graphs of the MAEs at $\alpha =\beta =1$, $\nu =1.5$, and various choices of

*N*($N=M$); by using our algorithm.

**Absolute errors at**
$\mathit{N}\mathbf{=}\mathit{M}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{5}$
**,**
$\mathit{\nu}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1.8}$
**with**
$\mathit{x}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$
**and different choices of**
α
**,**
β
**for Example**
**3**

t | α = β = 0 | α = β = 0.5 | α = β = 1 | α = −β = −0.5 | α = β = −0.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 5.2 × 10 | 4.9 × 10 | 4.0 × 10 | 8.1 × 10 | 4.5 × 10 |

0.2 | 2.3 × 10 | 7.8 × 10 | 2.4 × 10 | 1.6 × 10 | 4.5 × 10 |

0.3 | 3.8 × 10 | 3.1 × 10 | 2.5 × 10 | 5.1 × 10 | 4.6 × 10 |

0.4 | 1.0 × 10 | 4.8 × 10 | 1.6 × 10 | 2.3 × 10 | 2.1 × 10 |

0.5 | 4.0 × 10 | 2.9 × 10 | 2.2 × 10 | 2.8 × 10 | 5.9 × 10 |

0.6 | 1.0 × 10 | 4.8 × 10 | 1.5 × 10 | 3.2 × 10 | 2.0 × 10 |

0.7 | 3.7 × 10 | 3.0 × 10 | 2.4 × 10 | 1.0 × 10 | 4.5 × 10 |

0.8 | 2.1 × 10 | 7.4 × 10 | 2.3 × 10 | 3.0 × 10 | 4.3 × 10 |

0.9 | 4.9 × 10 | 4.6 × 10 | 3.7 × 10 | 1.4 × 10 | 4.2 × 10 |

Results that have been obtained in the case of $\alpha =\beta =-\frac{1}{2}$ are entirely consistent with the results presented by Doha *et al.* [39].

## 5 Conclusion

The fundamental objective of the paper is to introduce a new method for solving the SFDE (5)-(7). Using the tau spectral method based on shifted Jacobi polynomials together with the operational matrix of fractional derivatives this objective has been achieved. The fractional derivatives are described in the Caputo sense. By adding more terms of the shifted Jacobi polynomial from (13), the errors will be smaller. In order to illustrate the accuracy of the method, we compared our approximate solutions of the problems with their exact and with the approximate solutions presented by other methods. According to the numerical results given in the previous section, the proposed method may be extended to solve several types of two-sided space-fractional partial FDEs subject to nonhomogeneous conditions.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This paper was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research DSR, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ North-Holland Math. Stud. 204. In
*Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations*. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.Google Scholar - Podlubny I Math. Sci. Eng. In
*Fractional Differential Equations*. Academic Press, New York; 1999.Google Scholar - Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI:
*Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Theory and Applications*. Gordon & Breach, Yverdon; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar - Su L, Wang W, Xu Q: Finite difference methods for fractional dispersion equations.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2010, 216: 3329-3334. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.04.060MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Miller K, Ross B:
*An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations*. Wiley, New York; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar - Oldham KB, Spanier J:
*The Fractional Calculus*. Academic Press, New York; 1974.MATHGoogle Scholar - Chen Y, Yi M, Yu C: Error analysis for numerical solution of fractional differential equation by Haar wavelets method.
*J. Comput. Sci.*2012. 10.1016/j.jocs.2012.04.008Google Scholar - Li YL: Haar wavelet operational matrix of fractional order integration and its applications in solving the fractional order differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2010, 216: 2276-2285. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.03.063MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Hashim I, Abdulaziz O, Momani S: Homotopy analysis method for fractional IVPs.
*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2009, 14: 674-684. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.09.014MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Odibat Z, Momani S, Xu H: A reliable algorithm of homotopy analysis method for solving nonlinear fractional differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Model.*2010, 34: 593-600. 10.1016/j.apm.2009.06.025MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Jafari H, Yousefi SA: Application of Legendre wavelets for solving fractional differential equations.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2011, 62: 1038-1045. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.04.024MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Abdulaziz O, Hashim I, Momani S: Application of homotopy-perturbation method to fractional IVPs.
*J. Comput. Appl. Math.*2008, 216: 574-584. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.06.010MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Odibat Z, Momani S: Modified homotopy perturbation method: application to quadratic Riccati differential equation of fractional order.
*Chaos Solitons Fractals*2008, 36: 167-174. 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.06.041MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yanga S, Xiao A, Su H: Convergence of the variational iteration method for solving multi-order fractional differential equations.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2010, 60: 2871-2879. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.09.044MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Doha EH, Bhrawy AH, Ezz-Eldien SS: Efficient Chebyshev spectral methods for solving multi-term fractional orders differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Model.*2011, 35: 5662-5672. 10.1016/j.apm.2011.05.011MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Bhrawy AH, Alofi AS, Ezz-Eldien SS: A quadrature tau method for variable coefficients fractional differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2011, 24: 2146-2152. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.06.016MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Doha EH, Bhrawy AH, Ezz-Eldien SS: A Chebyshev spectral method based on operational matrix for initial and boundary value problems of fractional order.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2011, 62: 2364-2373. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.07.024MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kayedi-Bardeh A, Eslahchi MR, Dehghan M: A method for obtaining the operational matrix of the fractional Jacobi functions and applications.
*J. Vib. Control*2012. 10.1177/1077546312467049Google Scholar - Saadatmandi A, Dehghan M: A new operational matrix for solving fractional-order differential equations.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2010, 59: 1326-1336. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.006MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Bhrawy AH, Alofi AS: The operational matrix of fractional integration for shifted Chebyshev polynomials.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2013, 26: 25-31. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.01.027MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Bhrawy AH, Alghamdi MA, Taha TM: A new modified generalized Laguerre operational matrix of fractional integration for solving fractional differential equations on the half line.
*Adv. Differ. Equ.*2012. 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-179Google Scholar - Bhrawy AH, Doha EH, Baleanu D, Ezz-Eldien SS: A spectral tau algorithm based on Jacobi operational matrix for numerical solution of time fractional diffusion-wave equations.
*J. Comput. Phys.*2014. 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.039Google Scholar - Doha EH, Bhrawy AH, Ezz-Eldien SS: A new Jacobi operational matrix: an application for solving fractional differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Model.*2012, 36: 4931-4943. 10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.031MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Doha EH, Bhrawy AH, Baleanu D, Ezz-Eldien SS: On shifted Jacobi spectral approximations for solving fractional differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2013, 219: 8042-8056. 10.1016/j.amc.2013.01.051MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Chechkin AV, Gorenflo R, Sokolov IM: Fractional diffusion in inhomogeneous media.
*J. Phys. A*2005, 38: 679-684. 10.1088/0305-4470/38/42/L03MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dal F: Application of variational iteration method to fractional hyperbolic partial differential equations.
*Math. Probl. Eng.*2009. 10.1155/2009/824385Google Scholar - Dalir M, Bashour M: Applications of fractional calculus.
*Appl. Math. Sci.*2010, 4: 1021-1032.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Dubbeldam JLA, Milchev A, Rostiashvili VG, Vilgis TA: Polymer translocation through a nanopore: a showcase of anomalous diffusion.
*Phys. Rev. E*2007., 76: Article ID 010801Google Scholar - Metzler R, Klafter J: The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach.
*Phys. Rep.*2000, 339: 1-77. 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Khader MM: On the numerical solutions for the fractional diffusion equation.
*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2011, 16: 2535-2542. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.09.007MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Sousa E: Numerical approximations for fractional diffusion equations via splines.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2011, 62: 938-944. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.04.015MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Tadjeran C, Meerschaert MM, Scheffler H-P: A second-order accurate numerical approximation for the fractional diffusion equation.
*J. Comp. Physiol.*2006, 213: 205-213. 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.008MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yuste SB: Weighted average finite difference methods for fractional diffusion equations.
*J. Comp. Physiol.*2006, 216: 264-274. 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.12.006MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Zheng Y, Li C, Zhao Z: A note on the finite element method for the space-fractional advection diffusion equation.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2010, 59: 1718-1726. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.071MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Su L, Wang W, Yang Z: Finite difference approximations for the fractional advection diffusion equation.
*Phys. Lett. A*2009, 373: 4405-4408. 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.004View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dehghan M: Finite difference procedures for solving a problem arising in modeling and design of certain optoelectronic devices.
*Math. Comput. Simul.*2006, 71: 16-30. 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.10.001View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Bhrawy AH, Baleanu D: A spectral Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto collocation method for a space-fractional advection diffusion equations with variable coefficients.
*Rep. Math. Phys.*2013, 72: 219-233. 10.1016/S0034-4877(14)60015-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Saadatmandi A, Dehghan M: A tau approach for solution of the space fractional diffusion equation.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2011, 62: 1135-1142. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.04.014MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Doha EH, Bhrawy AH, Ezz-Eldien SS: Numerical approximations for fractional diffusion equations via a Chebyshev spectral-tau method.
*Cent. Eur. J. Phys.*2013, 11(10):1494-1503. 10.2478/s11534-013-0264-7MATHGoogle Scholar - Bhrawy, AH, Tharwat, MM, Alghamdi, MA: A new operational matrix of fractional integration for shifted Jacobi polynomials. Bull. Malays. Math. Soc. (2013, accepted)Google Scholar
- Canuto C, Hussaini MY, Quarteroni A, Zang TA:
*Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics*. Springer, New York; 1988.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.