- Open Access
On Caputo modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives
© Gambo et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
- Received: 19 September 2013
- Accepted: 5 December 2013
- Published: 7 January 2014
This paper is devoted to the study of Caputo modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives. From here and after, by Caputo-Hadamard derivative, we refer to this modified fractional derivative (Jarad et al. in Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012:142, 2012, p.7). We present the generalization of the fundamental theorem of fractional calculus (FTFC) in the Caputo-Hadamard setting. Also, several new related results are presented.
- Caputo-Hadamard fractional derivatives
- fundamental theorem of fractional calculus
Finding new generalization of the existing fractional derivatives was always the main direction of research within this field. These generalized operators will give us new opportunities to improve the existing results from theoretical and applied viewpoints. Although the works in [8–10] played important roles in the development of the fractional calculus within the frame of the Hadamard derivative, vast and vital work in this field is still undone.
The presence of the δ-differential operator () in the definition of Hadamard fractional derivatives could make their study uninteresting and less applicable than Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives. More so, this operator appears outside the integral in the definition of the Hadamard derivatives just like the usual derivative is located outside the integral in the case of Riemann-Liouville, which makes the fractional derivative of a constant of these two types not equal to zero in general. The authors in  studied and modified the Hadamard derivatives into a more useful type using Caputo definitions.
Just like Riemann-Liouville, Hadamard derivative has its own disadvantages as well, one of which is the fact that the derivative of a constant is not equal to 0 in general. The authors in  resolved these problems by modifying the derivative into a more suitable one having physically interpretable initial conditions similar to the ones in the Caputo settings.
In [12–14], the authors recovered the concepts of fractional integrals and fractional derivatives in different forms and introduced a new version of FTFC in Caputo settings, which is regarded as a generalization of the classical fundamental theorem of calculus. This ignites our curiosity in the possibility of generalizing FTFC in the sense our new definitions given in  as Hadamard and Riemann-Liouville (for example) cannot be used for this generalization (see Section 3). Using the generalization or otherwise, we then formulate new results and theorems.
We study much of this modified derivative thereby formulating some important theorems and results. The Caputo-Hadamard fractional derivatives are used to develop the FTFC, and then the new results are applied in the formulation of some other theorems. As we shall see later, some interesting properties of the modified derivatives are necessary in order to formulate some important outcomes. Section 2 gives some definitions and known results which have been used in this paper, whilst both Sections 3 and 4 are devoted to the original results. Section 5 concludes the paper.
Below, we begin with some basic definitions and results.
Property 1 [, p.112]
Lemma 1 [, pp.114-116]
- (a)If and , then for ,(10)
Equations (10) and (11) are called semigroup properties of Hadamard fractional integrals and derivatives.
Theorem 1 [, p.4]
- (a)if ,(17)(18)
- (b)if ,(19)
Lemma 2 [, p.5]
Let , and .
Lemma 3 [, p.6]
replaces tedious computations of the limit of sums of rectangular areas with a more easier way of finding an anti-derivative.
are the left-sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and the fractional derivative, respectively. While the Hadamard fractional integral and the fractional derivative, and respectively, are given by (2) to (5).
Thus, (30) cannot be considered as the fractional generalization of FTC in the form of (24). Similarly, using Lemma 2.5 of , we can see that Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives cannot be used to generalize FTFC in the form of (24) as well.
In most cases, we would only be using the left-sided definitions of fractional derivatives or integrals where the definitions are quite similar to the right-sided ones. Therefore (33) can be considered as a fractional generalization of FTC in the form of (24).
In the next theorem, we give the FTFC in the Caputo-Hadamard setting.
Theorem 2 (Fundamental theorem of fractional calculus)
- (a)If or , then(34)
- (b)Using (17), we have(37)
In this case we can apply the semigroup proper (10), unlike in the cases of Hadamard and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives where and , respectively, are located outside the integrals.
Hence gives (35). The right-sided case can be proven in a similar way. □
This is where we make the first use of Theorem 2.
Rearranging (43) gives (41). This completes the proof. □
Note that the right-sided case can also be proven in a similar way.
Applying the mean value theorem for integral and simplifying as before, we obtain (44). □
Thus we have (47). Then if , implies and from (47), we have (48). We can get an immediate consequence of Lemma 6. □
The proof is straightforward.
is the remainder of the terms in the expansion.
However, we may relax the conditions on φ in Corollary 1 as in the next result.
Lemma 7 Let and such that and . More so, suppose that is continuous on for some . Then is continuous and .
Thus, is continuous and by (51). This completes the proof of the lemma. □
Theorem 3 (Semigroup property for Caputo-Hadamard derivatives)
This ends the proof. □
In the next lemma, we give the generalization of Theorem 3.
where , and .
Proof The proof follows immediately from Theorem 3 and using mathematical induction. □
Observe that Theorem 4 is the generalization of Lemma 2.4(i) of  where .
Both Theorem 3 and Lemma 8 deal with the reduction of higher fractional order differential systems to lower order systems for Caputo-Hadamard fractional derivatives. However, in some instances it may also be useful to involve the Caputo-Hadamard and the Hadamard differential operator.
- 1.If , then by (19) and from (2.7.13) of , (59) becomes
- 2.Otherwise, since , then by definitions
Since the Caputo-Hadamard fractional derivatives were introduced in , not much about the modified derivatives were studied despite the fact that the derivatives have many advantages over the usual Hadamard fractional derivative. We proved that the Hadamard fractional derivatives cannot be used to generalize the FTFC whereas the Caputo-Hadamard derivative works perfectly. The FTFC is then used in formulating other results whose applications to fractional vector calculus in the study of Green’s theorem, Stoke’s theorem and so forth, as well as in the study of anomalous diffusion is a further work. Many new results such as the semigroup properties for the modified derivatives are studied in detail.
The first author wishes to give special thanks to His Excellency, the Executive Governor of Kano State of Nigeria, Engineer (Dr.) Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso, for his endless, patriotic and tireless support and constant encouragement.
- Magin RL: Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering. Begell House, Redding; 2006.Google Scholar
- Baleanu D, Diethelm K, Scalas E, Trujillo JJ Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. In Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods. World Scientific, Singapore; 2012.Google Scholar
- Hilfer R (Ed): Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore; 2000.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Mainardi F: Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Mathematical Models. Imperial College Press, London; 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas AA, Srivastava HH, Trujillo JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Samko SG, Kilbas A, Marichev OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, Amsterdam; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas AA: Hadamard-type fractional calculus. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2001, 38(6):1191–1204.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Butzer PL, Kilbas AA, Trujillo JJ: Compositions of Hadamard-type fractional integration operators and the semigroup property. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 269: 387–400. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00049-5MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butzer PL, Kilbas AA, Trujillo JJ: Mellin transform analysis and integration by parts for Hadamard-type fractional integrals. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 270: 1–15. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00066-5MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jarad F, Baleanu D, Abdeljawad A: Caputo-type modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012., 2012: Article ID 142Google Scholar
- Eliana CG, De Oliveira EC: Fractional versions of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Appl. Math. 2013, 4: 23–33.Google Scholar
- Tarasov VE: Fractional vector calculus and fractional Maxwell’s equations. Ann. Phys. 2008, 323: 2756–2778. 10.1016/j.aop.2008.04.005MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tarasov VE: Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media. Springer, Heidelberg; 2010. Higher Education Press, BeijingView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robert GB, Sherbert DR: Introduction to Real Analysis. Wiley, New York; 2000.Google Scholar
- Changpin LA, Weihua D: Remarks on fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 187: 777–784. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.163MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Changpin LA, Deliang Q, Yangquan C: On Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2011., 2011: Article ID 562494Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.