Skip to main content

A nonlocal multi-point multi-term fractional boundary value problem with Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices

Abstract

In this paper, we study the existence of solutions for fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with multi-point multi-term Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices. The Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions considered in the problem address a more general situation in contrast to the case of a single index. Our results are based on standard fixed point theorems. Some illustrative examples are also presented.

MSC:26A33, 34A08.

1 Introduction

In the last few decades, the subject of fractional differential equations has become a hot topic for the researchers due to its intensive development and applications in the field of physics, mechanics, chemistry, engineering, etc. For a reader interested in the systematic development of the topic, we refer the books [16]. A fractional-order differential operator distinguishes itself from the integer-order differential operator in the sense that it is nonlocal in nature, that is, the future state of a dynamical system or process involving fractional derivative depends on its current state as well its past states. In other words, differential equations of arbitrary order describe memory and hereditary properties of various materials and processes. As a matter of fact, this characteristic of fractional calculus makes the fractional-order models more realistic and practical than the classical integer-order models. There has been a great surge in developing the theoretical aspects such as periodicity, asymptotic behavior and numerical methods for fractional equations. For some recent work on the topic, see [725] and the references therein. In particular, the authors studied nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order with multi-strip boundary conditions in [21], while a boundary value of nonlinear fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with Riemann-Liouville type multi-strip boundary conditions was investigated in [22]. Sudsutad and Tariboon [26] obtained some existence results for an integro-differential equation of fractional order q(1,2] with m-point multi-term fractional-order integral boundary conditions.

In this paper, we study a boundary value problem of fractional differential equations of arbitrary order q(n1,n], n2 with m-point multi-term Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices given by

{ D q c x ( t ) = f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t [ 0 , T ] , x ( 0 ) = 0 , x ( 0 ) = 0 , , x ( n 2 ) ( 0 ) = 0 , x ( T ) = i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i [ I k j , i x ] | η i 1 η i ,
(1.1)

where D q c denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order q, f is a given continuous function, [ I k j , i x] | η i 1 η i =[ I k j , i x]( η i )[ I k j , i x]( η i 1 ), I k j , i is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order k j , i >0, j=1,2,, ν i , ν i N={1,2,}, i=1,2,,m1, 0= η 0 < η 1 < η 2 << η m 2 < η m 1 =T, and γ j , i R is such that

( T n 1 i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i ( η i k j , i + n 1 η i 1 k j , i + n 1 ) Γ ( n ) Γ ( k j , i + n ) ) 0.

Here we emphasize that Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices give rise to a more general situation in contrast to the case of a single index [22]. Furthermore, the present work dealing with an arbitrary-order problem generalizes the results for the problem of order q(1,2] obtained in [26]. Several examples are considered to show the worth of the results established in this paper.

We develop some existence results for problem (1.1) by using standard techniques of fixed point theory. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall some preliminary facts that we need in the sequel, and Section 3 contains the main results. Section 4 provides some examples for the illustration of the main results.

2 Preliminaries from fractional calculus

Let us recall some basic definitions of fractional calculus [24].

Definition 2.1 For an at least n-times continuously differentiable function g:[0,)R, the Caputo derivative of fractional order q is defined as

D q c g(t)= 1 Γ ( n q ) 0 t ( t s ) n q 1 g ( n ) (s)ds,n1<q<n,n=[q]+1,

where [q] denotes the integer part of the real number q.

Definition 2.2 The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order q is defined as

I q g(t)= 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t g ( s ) ( t s ) 1 q ds,q>0,

provided the integral exists.

Lemma 2.3 For yC[0,T], the fractional boundary value problem

{ D q c x ( t ) = y ( t ) , t [ 0 , T ] , q ( n 1 , n ] , x ( 0 ) = 0 , x ( 0 ) = 0 , , x ( n 2 ) = 0 , x ( T ) = i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i [ I k j , i x ] | η i 1 η i
(2.1)

has a unique solution given by

x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 y ( s ) d s t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 y ( s ) d s + t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s ] ,
(2.2)

where

δ= ( T n 1 i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i ( η i k j , i + n 1 η i 1 k j , i + n 1 ) Γ ( n ) Γ ( k j , i + n ) ) 0.
(2.3)

Proof The general solution of fractional differential equations in (2.1) can be written as [4]

x(t)= 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 y(s)ds c 0 c 1 t c n 1 t n 1 .
(2.4)

Using the given boundary conditions, it is found that c 0 =0, c 1 =0, …, c n 2 =0. Applying the Riemann-Liouville integral operator I k j , i on (2.4), we get

I k j , i x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( k j , i ) 0 t ( t s ) k j , i 1 ( 1 Γ ( q ) 0 s ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u c n 1 s n 1 ) d s = 1 Γ ( k j , i ) Γ ( q ) 0 t 0 s ( t s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s c n 1 1 Γ ( k j , i ) 0 t ( t s ) k j , i 1 s n 1 d s .

Using the concept of beta function, we find that

1 Γ ( k j , i ) 0 t ( t s ) k j , i 1 s n 1 ds= t k j , i + n 1 Γ ( n ) Γ ( k j , i + n ) .

Now using the condition

x(T)= i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i [ I k j , i x ] | η i 1 η i = [ I k j , i x ] ( η i ) [ I k j , i x ] ( η i 1 ),

we obtain

1 Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 y ( s ) d s c n 1 T n 1 = i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i Γ ( q ) Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s ] c n 1 i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i ( η i k j , i + n 1 η i 1 k j , i + n 1 ) Γ ( n ) Γ ( k j , i + n ) ,

which yields

c n 1 = 1 δ Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 y ( s ) d s 1 δ Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 y ( u ) d u d s ] ,

where δ is given by (2.3). Substituting the values of c 0 , c 1 ,, c n 2 , c n 1 in (2.4), we obtain (2.2). This completes the proof. □

3 Main results

Let C:=C([0,T],R) denote the Banach space of all continuous functions defined on [0,T]×R endowed with a topology of uniform convergence with the norm x= sup t [ 0 , T ] |x(t)|.

To prove the existence results for problem (1.1), we need the following known results.

Theorem 3.1 (Leray-Schauder alternative [[27], p.4])

Let X be a Banach space. Assume that T:XX is a completely continuous operator and the set

V={uXu=μTu,0<μ<1}

is bounded. Then T has a fixed point in X.

Theorem 3.2 [28]

Let X be a Banach space. Assume that Ω is an open bounded subset of X with θΩ, and let T: Ω ¯ X be a completely continuous operator such that

Tuu,uΩ.

Then T has a fixed point in Ω ¯ .

By Lemma 2.3, we define an operator P:CC as

( P x ) ( t ) = 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 f ( u , x ( u ) ) d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 f ( u , x ( u ) ) d u d s ] , t [ 0 , T ] .
(3.1)

Observe that problem (1.1) has a solution if and only if the associated fixed point problem Px=x has a fixed point.

For the sake of convenience, we set

ϑ= T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) .
(3.2)

Theorem 3.3 Assume that there exists a positive constant L 1 such that |f(t,x)| L 1 for t[0,T], xR. Then problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof First of all, we show that the operator P is completely continuous. Note that the operator P is continuous in view of the continuity of f. Let BC be a bounded set. By the assumption that |f(t,x)| L 1 , for xB, we have

| ( P x ) ( t ) | 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s ) L 1 [ 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 d u d s ) ] L 1 { T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) } = L 2 ,

which implies that (Px) L 2 . Further, we find that

| ( P x ) ( t ) | = 1 Γ ( q 1 ) 0 t ( t s ) q 2 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + ( n 1 ) t n 2 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + ( n 1 ) t n 2 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s ) L 1 [ 1 Γ ( q 1 ) 0 t ( t s ) q 2 d s + ( n 1 ) t n 2 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 d s + ( n 1 ) t n 2 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 d u d s ) ] L 1 { T q 1 Γ ( q ) + ( n 1 ) T q + n 2 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + ( n 1 ) T n 2 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) } = L 3 .

Hence, for t 1 , t 2 [0,T], we have

| ( P x ) ( t 2 ) ( P x ) ( t 1 ) | t 1 t 2 | ( P x ) ( s ) | ds L 3 ( t 2 t 1 ).

This implies that P is equicontinuous on [0,T]. Thus, by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, the operator P:CC is completely continuous.

Next, we consider the set

V={xCx=μPx,0<μ<1},

and show that the set V is bounded. Let xV, then x=μPx, 0<μ<1. For any t[0,T], we have

| x ( t ) | = μ | ( P x ) ( t ) | 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s ) L 1 { T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) } = M 1 .

Thus, x M 1 for any t[0,T]. So, the set V is bounded. Thus, by the conclusion of Theorem 3.1, the operator P has at least one fixed point, which implies that (1.1) has at least one solution. □

Theorem 3.4 Let there exist a small positive number τ such that |f(t,x)|ϵ|x| for 0<|x|<τ, with 0<ϵ1/ϑ, where ϑ is given by (3.2). Then problem (1.1) has at least one solution.

Proof Let us define B τ ={xCx<τ} and take xC such that x=τ, that is, x B τ . As before, it can be shown that P is completely continuous and

P x sup t [ 0 , t ] { 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s ) } ϑ ϵ x ,

which, in view of the given condition (ϵϑ1), gives Pxx, x B τ . Therefore, by Theorem 3.2, the operator P has at least one fixed point, which in turn implies that problem (1.1) has at least one solution. □

Our next result is based on Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative.

Lemma 3.5 (Nonlinear alternative for single-valued maps [[27], p.135])

Let E be a Banach space, C be a closed, convex subset of E, U be an open subset of C and 0U. Suppose that F: U ¯ C is a continuous, compact (that is, F( U ¯ ) is a relatively compact subset of C) map. Then either

  1. (i)

    F has a fixed point in U ¯ , or

  2. (ii)

    there are uU (the boundary of U in C) and λ(0,1) with u=λF(u).

Theorem 3.6 Assume that

(A1) there exist a function σC([0,1], R + ) and a nondecreasing function ψ: R + R + such that |f(t,x)|σ(t)ψ(x), (t,x)[0,T]×R;

(A2) there exists a constant M>0 such that

M ψ ( M ) ϑ σ >1.

Then boundary value problem (1.1) has at least one solution on [0,T].

Proof Consider the operator P:CC defined by (3.1). We show that P maps bounded sets into bounded sets in C([0,T],R). For a positive number r, let B r ={xC([0,T],R):xr} be a bounded set in C([0,T],R). Then

P x sup t [ 0 , T ] { 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) ( 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) | d u d s ) } ψ ( r ) { T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) } σ .

Next we show that F maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of C([0,1],R). Let t , t [0,1] with t < t and x B r , where B r is a bounded set of C([0,1],R). Then we obtain

| ( P x ) ( t ) ( P x ) ( t ) | = | 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s [ ( t ) n 1 ( t ) n 1 ] δ Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 f ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + [ ( t ) n 1 ( t ) n 1 ] δ Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 f ( u , x ( u ) ) d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 f ( u , x ( u ) ) d u d s ] | 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t | ( t s ) q 1 ( t s ) q 1 | ψ ( r ) σ ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( q ) t t | t s | q 1 ψ ( r ) σ ( s ) d s + | ( t ) n 1 ( t ) n 1 | | δ | Γ ( q ) 0 T | T s | q 1 ψ ( r ) σ ( s ) d s + | ( t ) n 1 ( t ) n 1 | | δ | Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s | ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | ψ ( r ) σ ( u ) d u d s + 0 η i 1 0 s | ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | ψ ( r ) σ ( u ) d u d s ] .

Obviously the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of x B r as t t 0. As P:C([0,T],R)C([0,T],R) satisfies the above assumptions, therefore it follows by the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem that P is completely continuous.

Let x be a solution. Then, for t[0,T], and following the similar computations as before, we find that

| x ( t ) | = | μ ( P x ) ( t ) | ψ ( x ) { T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) } σ = ψ ( x ) ϑ σ .

In consequence, we have

x ψ ( x ) ϑ σ 1.

Thus, by (A2), there exists M such that xM. Let us set

V= { x C ( [ 0 , T ] , R ) : x < M + 1 } .

Note that the operator P: V ¯ C([0,T],R) is continuous and completely continuous. From the choice of V, there is no xV such that x=μP(x) for some μ(0,1). Consequently, by the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type (Lemma 3.5), we deduce that P has a fixed point x V ¯ which is a solution of problem (1.1). This completes the proof. □

Finally we prove an existence and uniqueness result by means of Banach’s contraction mapping principle.

Theorem 3.7 Suppose that f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function and satisfies the following assumption:

(A3) |f(t,x)f(t,y)|L|xy|, t[0,1], L>0, x,yR.

Then boundary value problem (1.1) has a unique solution provided

L<1/ϑ,
(3.3)

where ϑ is given by (3.2).

Proof With rMϑ/(1Lϑ), we define B r ={xC:xr}, where M= sup t [ 0 , T ] |f(t,0)|< and ϑ is given by (2.3). Then we show that P B r B r . For x B r , by means of the inequality |f(s,x(s))||f(s,x(s))f(s,0)|+|f(s,0)|Lx+MLr+M, it can easily be shown that

Px=(Lr+M)ϑr.

Now, for x,yC and for each t[0,T], we obtain

( P x ) ( P y ) sup t [ 0 , T ] { 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) f ( s , y ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) 0 T ( T s ) q 1 | f ( s , x ( s ) ) f ( s , y ( s ) ) | d s + t n 1 δ Γ ( q ) i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | Γ ( k j , i ) [ 0 η i 0 s ( η i s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) f ( u , y ( u ) ) | d u d s 0 η i 1 0 s ( η i 1 s ) k j , i 1 ( s u ) q 1 | f ( u , x ( u ) ) f ( u , y ( u ) ) | d u d s ] } L ϑ x y .

Note that ϑ depends only on the parameters involved in the problem. As Lϑ<1, therefore P is a contraction. Hence, by Banach’s contraction mapping principle, problem (1.1) has a unique solution on [0,T]. □

4 Examples

In this section, we present some examples for the illustration of the results established in Section 3 by choosing the nonlinear function f(t,x(t)) appropriately. Let us consider the following nonlocal boundary value problem:

{ D 11 / 2 c x ( t ) = f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t [ 0 , 2 ] , x ( 0 ) = 0 , x ( 0 ) = 0 , , x ( 4 ) ( 0 ) = 0 , x ( T ) = i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i [ I k j , i x ] | η i 1 η i ,
(4.1)

where q=11/2, n=6, m=5, η 0 =0, η 1 =1/2, η 2 =1, η 3 =3/2, η 4 =T=2, ν 1 =1, ν 2 =2, ν 3 =3, ν 4 =4, γ 1 , 1 =4, γ 1 , 2 =7, γ 2 , 2 =8, γ 1 , 3 =10, γ 2 , 3 =15, γ 3 , 3 =21, γ 1 , 4 =3, γ 2 , 4 =9, γ 3 , 4 =15, γ 4 , 4 =21, k 1 , 1 =3/2, k 1 , 2 =5/4, k 2 , 2 =7/4, k 1 , 3 =1/2, k 2 , 3 =5/4, k 3 , 3 =9/4, k 1 , 4 =3/4, k 2 , 4 =7/4, k 3 , 4 =11/4, k 4 , 4 =15/4. Using the given data, we find that

δ= T n 1 i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i γ j , i ( η i k j , i + n 1 η i 1 k j , i + n 1 ) Γ ( n ) Γ ( k j , i + n ) 113.395760,

and

ϑ= T q Γ ( q + 1 ) + T q + n 1 | δ | Γ ( q + 1 ) + T n 1 | δ | i = 1 m 1 j = 1 ν i | γ j , i | η i q + k j , i η i 1 q + k j , i Γ ( q + k j , i + 1 ) 0.37757.
  1. (a)

    As a first example, let us take

    f ( t , x ( t ) ) = e ( 2 cos 2 x ( t ) ) 2 [ 5 sin 2 t + 10 ln ( 1 + 4 cos 2 x ( t ) ) ] ( 26 + sin x ( t ) ) .
    (4.2)

Observe that |f(t,x)| L 1 with L 1 = e 4 (1+2ln5). Thus the hypothesis of Theorem 3.3 is satisfied. Hence, by the conclusion of Theorem 3.3, problem (4.1) with f(t,x(t)) given by (4.2) has at least one solution.

  1. (b)

    Let us consider

    f ( t , x ( t ) ) =x ( b 4 + x 4 ( t ) ) 1 4 +2 ( 1 + sin ( t 4 + 1 ) ) 3 ( 1 cos x ( t ) ) ,x0,b>0.
    (4.3)

For sufficiently small x (ignoring x 2 and higher powers of x), we have

| x ( b 4 + x 4 ( t ) ) 1 4 + 2 ( 1 + sin ( t 4 + 1 ) ) 3 ( 1 cos x ( t ) ) | b|x|.

Choosing b1/ϑ, all the assumptions of Theorem 3.4 hold. Therefore, the conclusion of Theorem 3.4 implies that problem (4.1) with f(t,x(t)) given by (4.3) has at least one solution.

  1. (c)

    Consider

    f ( t , x ( t ) ) = t + 14 ( 1 + | x | 1 + | x | ) σ(t)ψ ( x ) ,
    (4.4)

with σ(t)= t + 14 and ψ(x)=2. Using σ=4, ϑ0.37757, we find by condition (A2) that M> M 1 , where M 1 3.02056. Thus all the assumptions of Theorem 3.6 are satisfied. Hence, it follows by Theorem 3.6 that problem (4.1) with f(t,x(t)) defined by (4.4) has at least one solution.

  1. (d)

    For the illustration of the existence-uniqueness result, we choose

    f ( t , x ( t ) ) = 1 ( t + 16 ) ( | x | 1 + | x | + tan 1 x ) + 4 + sin t .
    (4.5)

Clearly, L=1/2 as |f(t,x)f(t,y)| 1 2 |xy| and L< 1 ϑ 2.64852. Therefore all the conditions of Theorem 3.7 hold, and consequently there exists a unique solution for problem (4.1) with f(t,x(t)) given by (4.5).

References

  1. 1.

    Miller KS, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations. Wiley, New York; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, Yverdon; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ North-Holland Mathematics Studies 204. In Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lakshmikantham V, Leela S, Vasundhara Devi J: Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems. Cambridge Academic Publishers, Cambridge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Baleanu D, Diethelm K, Scalas E, Trujillo JJ Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. In Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods. World Scientific, Boston; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Benchohra M, Hamani S, Ntouyas SK: Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional order and nonlocal conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 2391-2396. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.073

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence of solutions for nonlocal boundary value problems of higher-order nonlinear fractional differential equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2009., 2009: Article ID 494720

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Agarwal RP, Benchohra M, Hamani S: A survey on existence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions. Acta Appl. Math. 2010, 109: 973-1033. 10.1007/s10440-008-9356-6

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ahmad B: Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 390-394. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.11.004

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Balachandran K, Trujillo JJ: The nonlocal Cauchy problem for nonlinear fractional integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72: 4587-4593. 10.1016/j.na.2010.02.035

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baleanu D, Mustafa OG: On the global existence of solutions to a class of fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59: 1835-1841. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.028

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhong W, Lin W: Nonlocal and multiple-point boundary value problem for fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 39: 1345-1351.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gafiychuk V, Datsko B, Meleshko V: Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diffusion systems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59: 1101-1107. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.05.013

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differential equations with fractional nonlocal integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 36

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ahmad B, Ntouyas SK: A four-point nonlocal integral boundary value problem for fractional differential equations of arbitrary order. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2011, 22: 1-15.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cuevas C, Soto H, Sepulveda A: Almost periodic and pseudo-almost periodic solutions to fractional differential and integrodifferential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218: 1735-1745. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.054

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ford NJ, Morgado ML: Fractional boundary value problems: analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2011, 14(4):554-567.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ahmad B, Ntouyas SK: A note on fractional differential equations with fractional separated boundary conditions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 818703

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Aghajani A, Jalilian Y, Trujillo JJ: On the existence of solutions of fractional integro-differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2012, 15(2):44-69.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ahmad B, Ntouyas SK: Nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order and multi-strip boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 98: 1-22.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmad B, Ntouyas SK, Alsaedi A: A study of nonlinear fractional differential equations of arbitrary order with Riemann-Liouville type multi-strip boundary conditions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013., 2013: Article ID 320415

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Debbouche A, Baleanu D, Agarwal RP: Nonlocal nonlinear integrodifferential equations of fractional orders. Bound. Value Probl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 78

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nyamoradi N, Baleanu D, Agarwal RP: On a multipoint boundary value problem for a fractional order differential inclusion on an infinite interval. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013., 2013: Article ID 823961

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Baleanu D, Agarwal RP, Mohammadi H, Rezapour S: Some existence results for a nonlinear fractional differential equation on partially ordered Banach spaces. Bound. Value Probl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 112

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sudsutad W, Tariboon J: Existence results of fractional integro-differential equations with m -point multi-term fractional order integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 94

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Granas A, Dugundji J: Fixed Point Theory. Springer, New York; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smart DR: Fixed Point Theorems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bashir Ahmad.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Each of the authors, AA, SKN, RPA and BA, contributed to each part of this work equally and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alsaedi, A., Ntouyas, S.K., Agarwal, R.P. et al. A nonlocal multi-point multi-term fractional boundary value problem with Riemann-Liouville type integral boundary conditions involving two indices. Adv Differ Equ 2013, 369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-369

Download citation

Keywords

  • fractional differential equations
  • nonlocal boundary conditions
  • fixed point theorems