Open Access

Relations between Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and Exton’s function X 8

Advances in Difference Equations20132013:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-34

Received: 14 December 2012

Accepted: 21 January 2013

Published: 14 February 2013

Abstract

Very recently Choi et al. derived some interesting relations between Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and the Srivastava function F ( 3 ) [ x , y , z ] by simply splitting Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) into eight parts. Here, in this paper, we aim at establishing eleven new and interesting transformations between Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and Exton’s function X 8 in the form of a single result. Our results presented here are derived with the help of two general summation formulae for the terminating F 1 2 ( 2 ) series which were very recently obtained by Kim et al. and also include the relationship between F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and X 8 due to Exton.

MSC: 33C20, 44A45.

Keywords

gamma functionhypergeometric functions of several variablesmultiple Gaussian hypergeometric seriesExton’s triple hypergeometric seriesGauss’s hypergeometric functionsLauricella’s triple hypergeometric functions

1 Introduction and preliminaries

In the usual notation, let denote the set of complex numbers. For
α j C ( j = 1 , , p ) and β j C Z 0 ( Z 0 : = Z { 0 } = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } ) ,
the generalized hypergeometric series F q p with p numerator parameters α 1 , , α p and q denominator parameters β 1 , , β q is defined by (see, for example, [[1], Chapter 4]; see also [[2], p.73]):
(1.1)
where
ω : = j = 1 q β j j = 1 p α j ( α j C ( j = 1 , , p ) ; β j C Z 0 ( j = 1 , , q ) )
(1.2)
and ( λ ) ν is the Pochhammer symbol or the shifted factorial since
( 1 ) n = n ! ( n N 0 ) ,
which is defined (for λ , ν C ), in terms of the familiar gamma function Γ, by
( λ ) ν : = Γ ( λ + ν ) Γ ( λ ) = { 1 ( ν = 0 ; λ C { 0 } ) , λ ( λ + 1 ) ( λ + n 1 ) ( ν = n N ; λ C ) ,
(1.3)

it being understood conventionally that ( 0 ) 0 : = 1 .

By using the notations as described in [[3], p.33, Equation 1.4(1)] (with n = 3 ) (see also [[4], p.114, Equation (1)], [[5], Equation (2.1)] and [[6], p.60, Equation 1.7(1)]), Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) is defined by
F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) = F A ( 3 ) ( a , b 1 , b 2 , b 3 ; c 1 , c 2 , c 3 ; x , y , z ) : = m , n , p = 0 ( a ) m + n + p ( b 1 ) m ( b 2 ) n ( b 3 ) p ( c 1 ) m ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x m m ! y n n ! z p p ! ( | x | + | y | + | z | < 1 ; c j C Z 0 ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) ) .
(1.4)

Motivated essentially by the works by Lardner [7] and Carlson [8], by simply splitting Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) into eight parts, very recently Choi et al. [5] presented several relationships between F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and the Srivastava function F ( 3 ) [ x , y , z ] (see also [9]). The widely-investigated Srivastava’s triple hypergeometric function F ( 3 ) [ x , y , z ] , which was introduced over four decades ago by Srivastava [[10], p.428] (see also [5], [[3], p.44, Equation 1.5(14)] and [[6], p.69, Equation 1.7(39)]), provides an interesting unification (and generalization) of Lauricella’s 14 triple hypergeometric functions F 1 , , F 14 (see [11], [[12], pp.113-114]) and Srivastava’s three functions H A , H B and H C (see [[13], pp.99-100]; see also [1416], [[3], p.43] and [[6], pp.60-68]).

Exton’s triple hypergeometric function X 8 (see [17]; see also [[3], p.84, Entry 41a and p.101, List 41a]) is defined by
(1.5)

In fact, in 1982 Exton [17] published a very interesting and useful research paper in which he encountered a number of triple hypergeometric functions of second order whose series representations involve such products as ( a ) 2 m + 2 n + p and ( a ) 2 m + n + p and introduced a set of 20 distinct triple hypergeometric functions X 1 to X 20 and also gave their integral representations of Laplacian type which include the confluent hypergeometric functions F 1 0 , F 1 1 , a Humbert function ψ 1 and a Humbert function ϕ 2 in their kernels. It is not out of place to mention here that Exton’s functions X 1 to X 20 have been studied a lot until today; see, for example, the works [12, 1823] and [24]. Moreover, Exton [17] presented a large number of very interesting transformation formulas and reducible cases with the help of two known results which are called in the literature Kummer’s first and second transformations or theorems.

Here, in this paper, we aim at establishing eleven new and interesting transformations between Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and Exton’s function X 8 in the form of a single result. Our results presented here are derived with the help of two general summation formulae for the terminating F 1 2 ( 2 ) series which were very recently obtained by Kim et al. [25] and also include the relationship between F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and X 8 due to Exton [17].

2 Results required

For our purpose, we require the following results recently obtained by Kim et al. [25]:
(2.1)
and
(2.2)
where n N 0 , j = 0 , ± 1 , , ± 5 , [ x ] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x and its modulus is denoted by | x | , and the coefficients A j and B j are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Contiguous relation coefficients

j

A j

B j

5

4 ( 1 α 2 n ) 2 + 2 ( 1 α ) ( 1 α 2 n ) + ( 1 α ) 2 + 22 ( 1 α 2 n ) 13 ( 1 α ) 20

4 ( α + 2 n ) 2 2 ( 1 α ) ( α + 2 n ) + ( 1 α ) 2 + 34 ( α + 2 n ) + ( 1 α ) + 62

4

2(α + 1 + 2n)(α + 3 + 2n)−α(α + 3)

4(α + 2n + 3)

3

α − 4n − 2

−3α − 4n − 6

2

α − 1 − 2n

−2

1

−1

1

0

1

0

−1

1

1

−2

1 − α − 2n

2

−3

1 − α − 4n

3 − 3α − 4n

−4

2(1 − 2α − n)(3 − α − 2n)−(1 − α)(4 − α)

4(1 − α − 2n)

−5

4 ( 1 α 2 n ) 2 2 ( 1 α ) ( 1 α 2 n ) ( 1 α ) 2 + 8 ( 1 α 2 n ) + 7 α 7

4 ( α + 2 n ) 2 + 2 ( 1 α ) ( α + 2 n ) ( 1 α ) 2 16 ( α + 2 n ) + α 1

3 Main transformation formulae

The results to be established here are as follows:
(3.1)

where the coefficients C j and D j can be obtained by simply changing n and α into r and c 1 , respectively, in Table 1 of A j and B j .

Proof For convenience and simplicity, by denoting the left-hand side of (3.1) by S and using the series definition of F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) as given in (1.4), after a little simplification, we have
S = m , n , p = 0 ( a ) m + n + p ( c 1 ) m ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 c 1 + j ) m ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x m m ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 2 m ( 1 + 2 x ) ( a + m + n + p ) .
Using the binomial theorem (see, for example, [[2], p.58]) for the last factor, we get
S = m , n , p , r = 0 ( a ) m + n + p ( c 1 ) m ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 c 1 + j ) m ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x m + r m ! r ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 2 m + r ( 1 ) r ( a + m + n + p ) r .
Using the identity ( a ) m + n + p ( a + m + n + p ) r = ( a ) m + n + p + r , after a little simplification, we obtain
S = m , n , p , r = 0 ( a ) m + n + p + r ( c 1 ) m ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 c 1 + j ) m ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x m + r m ! r ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 2 m + r ( 1 ) r .
Now using the following well-known formal manipulation of double series (see [[2], p.56]; for other manipulations, see also [[26], Eq. (1.4)]):
r = 0 m = 0 A ( m , r ) = r = 0 m = 0 r A ( m , r m ) ,
after a little simplification, we have
S = n , p , r = 0 m = 0 r ( a ) n + p + r ( c 1 ) m ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 c 1 + j ) m ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x r m ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 m + r ( 1 ) r m ( r m ) ! .
Using the following formula:
( r m ) ! = ( 1 ) m r ! ( r ) m ( 0 m r ; r , m N 0 ) ,
after a little simplification, we get
S = n , p , r = 0 ( a ) n + p + r ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 ) r ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x r r ! y n n ! z p p ! m = 0 r ( c 1 ) m ( r ) m ( 2 c 1 + j ) m m ! 2 m .
Using the definition of F q p in (1.1) for the inner series, we obtain
S = n , p , r = 0 ( a ) n + p + r ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 ) r ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x r r ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 F 1 [ r , c 1 ; 2 c 1 + j ; 2 ] .
Separating r into even and odd integers, we have
S = n , p , r = 0 ( a ) n + p + 2 r ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p 2 2 r ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x 2 r ( 2 r ) ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 F 1 [ 2 r , c 1 ; 2 c 1 + j ; 2 ] + n , p , r = 0 ( a ) n + p + 2 r + 1 ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( 2 ) 2 r + 1 ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p x 2 r + 1 ( 2 r + 1 ) ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 F 1 [ 2 r 1 , c 1 ; 2 c 1 + j ; 2 ] .
Making use of the following identity:
( α ) 2 r = 2 2 r ( α ) r ( α 2 ) r ,
after a little simplification, we get
S = n , p , r = 0 ( a ) n + p + 2 r ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p ( 1 2 ) r x 2 r r ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 F 1 [ 2 r , c 1 ; 2 c 1 + j ; 2 ] 2 x a n , p , r = 0 ( a + 1 ) n + p + 2 r ( b 1 ) n ( b 2 ) p ( c 2 ) n ( c 3 ) p ( 3 2 ) r x 2 r r ! y n n ! z p p ! 2 F 1 [ 2 r 1 , c 1 ; 2 c 1 + j ; 2 ] .

Finally, using the known results (2.1) and (2.2), after a little simplification, we easily arrive at the right-hand side of (3.1). This completes the proof of (3.1). □

4 Special cases

In our main formula (3.1), if we take j = 0 , ± 1 and ±2, after a little simplification, and interpret the respective resulting right-hand sides with the definition of Exton’s triple hypergeometric series X 8 given in (1.5), we get the following very interesting relations between F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and X 8 :

The case j = 0 .
(4.1)
The case j = 1 .
(4.2)
The case j = 1 .
(4.3)
The case j = 2 .
(4.4)
The case j = 2 .
(4.5)

Remark Clearly, Equation (4.1) is Exton’s result (see [17]) and Equations (4.2) to (4.5) are closely related to it. The other special cases of (3.1) can also be expressed in terms of X 8 in a similar manner.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.

This paper was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0002957).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Dongguk University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical & Physical Sciences, Central University of Kerala

References

  1. Erdélyi A, Magnus W, Oberhettinger F, Tricomi FG I. In Higher Transcendental Functions. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1953.Google Scholar
  2. Rainville ED: Special Functions. Macmillan Co., New York; 1960. Reprinted by Chelsea, New York (1971)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Srivastava HM, Karlsson PW: Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series. Horwood, Chichester; 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Appell P, Kampé de Fériet J: Fonctions Hypergeometriques et Hyperspheriques; Polynomes d’Hermite. Gauthier-Villars, Paris; 1926.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi J, Hasanov A, Srivastava HM:Relations between Lauricella’s triple hypergeometric function F A ( 3 ) ( x , y , z ) and the Srivastava function F ( 3 ) [ x , y , z ] . Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2012, 23(1):69-82. 10.1080/10652469.2011.596710MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Srivastava HM, Manocha HL: A Treatise on Generating Functions. Horwood, Chichester; 1984.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Lardner TJ:Relations between F 3 0 and Bessel functions. SIAM Rev. 1969, 11: 69-72. 10.1137/1011007MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson BC:Some extensions of Lardner’s relations between F 3 0 and Bessel functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1970, 1(2):232-242. 10.1137/0501021MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi J, Kim YS, Hasanov A:Relations between the hypergeometric function of Appell F 3 and Kampé de Fériet functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 2011, 12(2):131-148.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Srivastava HM: Generalized Neumann expansions involving hypergeometric functions. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1967, 63: 425-429. 10.1017/S0305004100041359MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lauricella G: Sulle funzioni ipergeometriche a più variabili. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 1893, 7: 111-158. 10.1007/BF03012437MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim YS, Choi J, Rathie AK:Remark on two results by Padmanabham for Exton’s triple hypergeometric series X 8 . Honam Math. J. 2005, 27(4):603-608.Google Scholar
  13. Srivastava HM: Hypergeometric functions of three variables. Ganita 1964, 15(2):97-108.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi J, Hasanov A, Srivastava HM, Turaev M: Integral representations for Srivastava’s triple hypergeometric functions. Taiwan. J. Math. 2011, 15: 2751-2762.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Srivastava HM: Some integrals representing triple hypergeometric functions. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 1967, 16: 99-115. 10.1007/BF02844089MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Turaev M:Decomposition formulas for Srivastava’s hypergeometric function H A on Saran functions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 233: 842-846. 10.1016/j.cam.2009.02.050MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Exton H: Hypergeometric functions of three variables. J. Indian Acad. Math. 1982, 4: 113-119.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Choi J, Hasanov A, Turaev M: Decomposition formulas and integral representations for some Exton hypergeometric functions. J. Chungcheong Math. Soc. 2011, 24(4):745-758.Google Scholar
  19. Choi J, Hasanov A, Turaev M:Linearly independent solutions for the hypergeometric Exton functions X 1 and X 2 . Honam Math. J. 2010, 32(2):223-229.Google Scholar
  20. Choi J, Hasanov A, Turaev M:Certain integral representations of Euler type for the Exton function X 5 . Honam Math. J. 2010, 32(3):389-397. 10.5831/HMJ.2010.32.3.389MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi J, Hasanov A, Turaev M:Certain integral representations of Euler type for the Exton function X 2 . J. Korean Soc. Math. Edu., Ser. B, Pure Appl. Math. 2010, 17(4):347-354.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YS, Rathie AK:On an extension formulas for the triple hypergeometric X 8 due to Exton. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 44(4):743-751. 10.4134/BKMS.2007.44.4.743MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim YS, Rathie AK, Choi J:Another method for Padmanabham’s transformation formula for Exton’s triple hypergeometric series X 8 . Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2009, 24(4):517-521. 10.4134/CKMS.2009.24.4.517MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SW, Kim YS: An extension of the triple hypergeometric series by Exton. Honam Math. J. 2009, 31(1):61-71.Google Scholar
  25. Kim YS, Rakha MA, Rathie AK: Generalization of Kummer’s second summation theorem with applications. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 2010, 50(3):387-402. 10.1134/S0965542510030024MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Choi J: Notes on formal manipulations of double series. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2003, 18(4):781-789.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Choi and Rathie; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.