Fractionalorder Chua’s system: discretization, bifurcation and chaos
 Ravi P Agarwal^{1}Email author,
 Ahmed M A ElSayed^{2} and
 Sanaa M Salman^{3}
https://doi.org/10.1186/168718472013320
© Agarwal et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 10 May 2013
Accepted: 4 October 2013
Published: 14 November 2013
Abstract
In this paper we are interested in the fractionalorder form of Chua’s system. A discretization process will be applied to obtain its discrete version. Fixed points and their asymptotic stability are investigated. Chaotic attractor, bifurcation and chaos for different values of the fractionalorder parameter are discussed. We show that the proposed discretization method is different from other discretization methods, such as predictorcorrector and Euler methods, in the sense that our method is an approximation for the righthand side of the system under study.
Keywords
Introduction
In recent years differential equations with fractional order have attracted many researchers’ attention because of their applications in many areas of science and engineering; see, for example, [1, 2], and [3]. The need for fractionalorder differential equations stems in part from the fact that many phenomena cannot be modeled by differential equations with integer derivatives. The fractional calculus has allowed the operations of integration and differentiation to be applied upon any fractional order. Recently, the theory of fractional differential equations attracted many scientists and mathematicians to work on [4–8]. For stability conditions and synchronization of a system of fractionalorder differential equations, one can see [9–11].
We recall the basic definitions (Caputo) and properties of fractional order differentiation and integration.
In addition, the following results are the main ones in fractional calculus. Let $\beta ,\gamma \in {\mathbb{R}}^{+}$, $\alpha \in (0,1)$,

${I}_{a}^{\beta}:{L}^{1}\to {L}^{1}$, and if $f(x)\in {L}^{1}$, then ${I}_{a}^{\gamma}{I}_{a}^{\beta}f(x)={I}_{a}^{\gamma +\beta}f(x)$.

${lim}_{\beta \to n}{I}_{a}^{\beta}f(x)={I}_{a}^{n}f(x)$ uniformly on $[a,b]$, $n=1,2,3,\dots $ , where ${I}_{a}^{1}f(x)={\int}_{a}^{x}f(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds$.

${lim}_{\beta \to 0}{I}_{a}^{\beta}f(x)=f(x)$ weakly.

If $f(x)$ is absolutely continuous on $[a,b]$, then ${lim}_{\alpha \to 1}{D}_{a}^{\alpha}f(x)=\frac{df(x)}{dx}$.
To solve fractionalorder differential equations, there are two famous methods: frequency domain methods [12] and time domain methods [13]. In recent years it has been shown that the second method is more effective because the first method is not always reliable in detecting chaos [14] and [15].
Often it is not desirable to solve a differential equation analytically, and one turns to numerical or computational methods.
In [16], a numerical method for nonlinear fractionalorder differential equations with constant or timevarying delay was devised. It should be noticed that the fractional differential equations tend to lower the dimensionality of the differential equations in question; however, introducing delay in differential equations makes them infinite dimensional. So, even a single ordinary differential equation with delay could display chaos.
Dealing with fractionalorder differential equations as dynamical systems is somehow new and has motivated the leading research literature recently; see, for example, [17, 18] and [19]. The nonlocal property of fractional differential equations means that the next state of a system not only depends on its current state but also on its historical states. This property is very close to the real world, and thus fractional differential equations have become popular and have been applied to dynamical systems.
On the other hand, some examples of dynamical systems generated by piecewise constant arguments were studied in [20–24].
Discretization process
In [25], a discretization process is introduced to discretize the fractionalorder differential equations, and we take Riccati’s fractionalorder differential equations as an example. We noticed that when the fractionalorder parameter $\alpha \to 1$, Euler’s discretization method is obtained. In [26], the same discretization method is applied to the logistic fractionalorder differential equation. We concluded that Euler’s method is able to discretize firstorder difference equations; however, we succeeded in discretizing a secondorder difference equation.
Here, we are interested in applying the discretization method to a system of differential equations like Chua’s system which is one of the autonomous differential equations capable of generating chaotic behavior. This system is well known and has been studied widely.
In [28], the author studied the effect of the fractional dynamics in Chua’s system. It has been demonstrated that the usual idea of system order must be modified when fractional derivatives are present.
with initial conditions $x(0)={x}_{o}$, $y(0)={y}_{o}$, and $z(0)={z}_{o}$.
The proposed discretization method has the following steps.
Remark 1 It should be noticed that if $\alpha \to 1$ in (8), we deduce the Euler discretization method of Chua’s system [29].
It is worth to mention here that many discretization methods, such as Euler’s method and predictorcorrector method, have been applied to Chua’s system (4). Euler’s method discretization is an approximation for the derivative while the predictorcorrector method is an approximation for the integral. However, our proposed discretization method here is an approximation for the righthand side as it is pretty clear from formula (8).
Fixed points and their asymptotic stability
Now we study the asymptotic stability of the fixed points of system (8) which has three fixed points:

$fi{x}_{1}=(0,0,0)$,

$fi{x}_{2}=(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})$,

$fi{x}_{3}=(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})$.
By considering a Jacobian matrix for one of these fixed points and calculating their eigenvalues, we can investigate the stability of each fixed point based on the roots of the system characteristic equation [30].
Now, let ${a}_{1}=A$, ${a}_{2}=B$, and ${a}_{3}=C$. From the Jury test, if $P(1)>0$, $P(1)<0$, and ${a}_{3}<1$, ${b}_{3}>{b}_{1}$, ${c}_{3}>{c}_{2}$, where ${b}_{3}=1{a}_{3}^{2}$, ${b}_{2}={a}_{1}{a}_{3}{a}_{2}$, ${b}_{1}={a}_{2}{a}_{3}{a}_{1}$, ${c}_{3}={b}_{3}^{2}{b}_{1}^{2}$, and ${c}_{2}={b}_{3}{b}_{2}{b}_{1}{b}_{2}$, then the roots of $P(\lambda )$ satisfy $\lambda <1$ and thus $fi{x}_{1}$ is asymptotically stable. This is not satisfied here since γ and β are positive and so ${b}_{3}<{b}_{1}$. That is, $fi{x}_{1}$ is unstable.
We let ${a}_{11}=s(1+\frac{2}{7}\gamma )3$, ${a}_{22}=3s(2+\frac{4}{7}\gamma ){s}^{2}(\beta +\gamma \frac{2}{7}\gamma )$, and ${a}_{33}=1+s(1+\frac{2}{7}\gamma )+{s}^{2}(\beta +\gamma \frac{2}{7}\gamma )\frac{2}{7}\gamma \beta {s}^{3}$. From the Jury test, if $F(1)>0$, $F(1)<0$, and ${a}_{33}<1$, ${b}_{33}>{b}_{11}$, ${c}_{33}>{c}_{22}$, where ${b}_{33}=1{a}_{33}^{2}$, ${b}_{22}={a}_{11}{a}_{33}{a}_{22}$, ${b}_{11}={a}_{22}{a}_{33}{a}_{11}$, ${c}_{33}={b}_{33}^{2}{b}_{11}^{2}$, and ${c}_{22}={b}_{33}{b}_{22}{b}_{11}{b}_{22}$, then the roots of $F(\lambda )$ satisfy $\lambda <1$ and thus $fi{x}_{2}$ or $fi{x}_{3}$ is asymptotically stable. We can check easily that $F(1)<0$, that is, both $fi{x}_{2}$ and $fi{x}_{3}$ are unstable.
Attractors, bifurcation and chaos
Conclusion
A discretization method is introduced to discretize fractionalorder differential equations and we take Chua’s system with cubic nonlinearity for our purpose. We have noticed that when $\alpha \to 1$, the discretization will be Euler’s discretization [29]. In addition, we carried out the numerical simulation when $\alpha \to 1$, we did not get any bifurcation at all. Actually, this is not surprising since we did the same in Rössler’s system in its discrete version. When we contacted Prof. Dr. Rössler himself about why we were not getting any bifurcation diagrams, he assured our results. Finally, it is not clear in this situation why the parameter α takes one value only to produce bifurcation and chaos diagrams.
On the other hand, we show some attractors of system (8) for different α. The numerical experiments show that playing with the parameter α away from $\alpha =0.75$ will not produce any bifurcation diagrams.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees of this manuscript for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Bhalekara S, DaftardarGejjib V, Baleanuc D, Magine R: Transient chaos in fractional Bloch equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64: 33673376. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Faieghi M, Kuntanapreeda S, Delavari H, Baleanu D: LMIbased stabilization of a class of fractionalorder chaotic systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2013, 72: 301309. 10.1007/s1107101207146MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Golmankhaneh AK, Arefi R, Baleanu D: The proposed modified Liu system with fractional order. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013., 2013: Article ID 186037Google Scholar
 Das S: Functional Fractional Calculus for System Identification and Controls. Springer, Berlin; 2007.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, ElMesiry A, ElSaka H: On the fractionalorder logistic equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 2007, 20: 817823. 10.1016/j.aml.2006.08.013MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 ElSayed AMA: On the fractional differential equations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 1992, 49(23):205213. 10.1016/00963003(92)90024UMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 ElSayed AMA: Nonlinear functionaldifferential equations of arbitrary orders. Nonlinear Anal. 1998, 33: 181186. 10.1016/S0362546X(97)005257MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, London; 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Matouk AE: Stability conditions, hyperchaos and control in a novel fractional order hyperchaotic system. Phys. Lett. A 2009, 373: 21662173. 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.032View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Matouk AE: Chaos synchronization between two different fractional systems of Lorenz family. Math. Probl. Eng. 2009., 2009: Article ID 572724Google Scholar
 Matouk AE: On some stability conditions and hyperchaos synchronization in the new fractional order hyperchaotic Chen system. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference ICCSA 2009.Google Scholar
 Sun H, Abdelwahed A, Onaral B: Linear approximation for transfer function with a pole of fractional order. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1984, 29: 441444. 10.1109/TAC.1984.1103551View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Diethelm K, Ford NJ, Freed AD: A predictorcorrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 2002, 29: 322. 10.1023/A:1016592219341MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Tavazoei MS, Haeri M: Unreliability of frequency domain approximation in recognizing chaos in fractional order systems. IET Signal Process. 2007, 1: 171181. 10.1049/ietspr:20070053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Tavazoei MS, Haeri M: Limitation of frequency domain approximation for detecting chaos in fractional order systems. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2008, 69: 12991320. 10.1016/j.na.2007.06.030MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wang Z: A numerical method for delayed fractionalorder differential equations. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 256071Google Scholar
 Erjaee GH: On analytical justification of phase synchronization in different chaotic systems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 3: 11951202.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Yan JP, Li CP: On chaos synchronization of fractional differential equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2007, 32: 725735. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.062MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wu, GC, Baleanu, D: Discrete fractional logistic map and its chaos. Nonlinear Dyn. (2013). doi:10.1007/s1107101310657. 10.1007/s1107101310657Google Scholar
 Akhmet MU: Stability of differential equations with piecewise constant arguments of generalized type. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68: 794803. 10.1016/j.na.2006.11.037MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Akhmet, MU, Altntana, D, Ergenc, T: Chaos of the logistic equation with piecewise constant arguments. arXiv:1006.4753 (2010). eprintatarXiv.orgGoogle Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: Chaos and bifurcation of discontinuous dynamical systems with piecewise constant arguments. Malaya J. Mat. 2012, 1: 1418.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: Chaos and bifurcation of the logistic discontinuous dynamical systems with piecewise constant arguments. Malaya J. Mat. 2013, 3: 1420.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: The unified system between Lorenz and Chen systems: a discretization process. Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 1: 318325.Google Scholar
 ElSayed AMA, Salman SM: On a discretization process of fractional order Riccati’s differential equation. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 2013, 4: 251259.Google Scholar
 ElSayed, AMA, Salman, SM: On a discretization process of fractionalorder Logistic differential equation. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. (accepted)Google Scholar
 Stegemann C, Albuquerque HA, Rech PC: Some two dimensional parameter space of a Chua system with cubic nonlinearity. Chaos, Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2007, 20: 817823.Google Scholar
 Hartely TT, Lorenzo CF, Qammer HK: Chaos in a fractional order Chau’s system. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl. 1995, 42: 485490. 10.1109/81.404062View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Elaidy SN Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. In An Introduction to Difference Equations. 3rd edition. Springer, New York; 2005.Google Scholar
 Holmgren R: A First Course in Discrete Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York; 1994.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Udwadia FE, von Bremen H: A note on the computation of the largest p Lyapunov characteristic exponents for nonlinear dynamical systems. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2000, 114: 205214. 10.1016/S00963003(99)001137MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.