Asymptotic behavior for third-order quasi-linear differential equations
© Qin et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 2 July 2013
Accepted: 14 October 2013
Published: 8 November 2013
In this paper, a class of third-order quasi-linear differential equations withcontinuously distributed delay is studied. Applying the generalized Riccatitransformation, integral averaging technique of Philos type and Young’sinequality, a set of new criteria for oscillation or certain asymptoticbehavior of nonoscillatory solutions of this equations is given. Our resultsessentially improve and complement some earlier publications.
Keywordsthird-order quasi-linear differential equations oscillation nonoscillation
We build up the following hypotheses firstly:
(H1) and ;
(H2) and ;
(H6) and ;
(H7) γ is a quotient of odd positive integers.
A function is a solution of (1) means that, , and satisfies (1) on . In this paper, we restrict our attention to thosesolutions of Eq. (1) which satisfy for all . We assume that Eq. (1) possesses such asolution. A solution of Eq. (1) is called oscillatory on if it is eventually positive or eventually negative;otherwise, it is called nonoscillatory.
However, as we know, oscillatory behaviors of solutions of Eq. (1) have not beenconsidered up to now. In this paper, we try to discuss the problem of oscillatorycriteria of Philos type of Eq. (1). Applying the generalized Riccati transformation,integral averaging technique of Philos type, Young’s inequality,etc., we obtain some new criteria for oscillation or certain asymptoticbehavior of nonoscillatory solutions of this equations. We should point out thatγ is any quotient of odd positive integers in this paper, but itis required that in .
2 Several lemmas
We start our work with the classification of possible nonoscillatory solutions of Eq.(1).
, , ;
, , .
Let and using (H1), we have . Thus eventually, which together with implies , which contradicts our assumption. This contradiction shows that, eventually. Therefore is increasing and thus (I) or (II) holds for, eventually. □
where . □
3 Main results
, ; , ;
- (ii), there exist and such that(21)
Suppose, further, that. Then every solutionof Eq. (1) is either oscillatory or converges to zero.
Proof Assume that Eq. (1) has a nonoscillatory solution. Without loss of generality, we may assume that, , , , , , is defined as in (4). By Lemma 2.1, we have that has the property (I) or the property (II). If has the property (II). Since (10) holds, then theconditions in Lemma 2.2 are satisfied. Hence .
The last inequality contradicts (22). □
where, then every solutionof Eq. (1) is either oscillatory or converges to zero.
and assume that the other assumptions of Theorem 3.2 hold,then every solution of Eq. (1) is either oscillatory or convergesto zero.
Proof The proof is similar to Theorem 3.2 and hence isomitted. □
Remark 3.4 When , Theorems 3.1-3.3 with condition (37) reduce toTheorems 3.1-3.3 of Zhang , respectively.
The authors would like to thank Prof. Yuanhong Yu and the anonymous reviewer fortheir constructive and valuable comments, which have contributed much to theimproved presentation of this paper. This work was supported by the NationalScience and Technology Major Projects of China (Grant No. 2012ZX10001001-006),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11101053, 7117102471371195), the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Departmentof China (Grant No. 11A008) and the Planned Science and Technology Project ofHunan Province of China (Grant No. 2012SK3098, 2013SK3143).
- Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D: Oscillation Theory for Difference and Functional DifferentialEquations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D: Oscillation Theory for Second Order Dynamic Equations. Taylor & Francis, London; 2003.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Erbe LH, Kong Q, Zhang BG: Oscillation Theory for Functional Differential Equations. Dekker, New York; 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Philos CG: Oscillation theorems for linear differential equations of second order. Arch. Math. 1989, 53: 482-492. 10.1007/BF01324723MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Baculíková B, Džurina J: Oscillation theorems for higher order neutral differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219: 3769-3778. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.10.006MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Q, Gao L, Yu Y: Oscillation criteria for third-order neutral differential equations withcontinuously distributed delay. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 25: 1514-1519.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Baculíková B, Džurina J: Oscillation of third-order neutral differential equations. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52: 215-226. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.011View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kiguradze IT:On the oscillation of solutions of the equations . Sb. Math. 1964, 65(2):172-187.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Rogovchenko YV: Oscillation theorems for second-order equations with damping. Nonlinear Anal. 2000, 41: 1005-1028. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00324-1MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tiryaki A, Yaman S: Asymptotic behavior of a class of nonlinear functional differential equationsof third order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2001, 14: 327-332. 10.1016/S0893-9659(00)00157-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tiryaki A, Aktas MF: Oscillation criteria of a certain class of third order nonlinear delaydifferential equations with damping. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 325: 54-68. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.001MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited.