Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Some identities related to Dedekind sums and the second-order linear recurrence polynomials

Abstract

In this paper, we use the elementary method and the reciprocity theorem of Dedekind sums to study the computational problem of one kind Dedekind sums, and give two interesting computational formulae related to Dedekind sums and the second-order linear recurrence polynomials.

MSC:11B37, 11F20.

1 Introduction

For any positive integer x, we define the generalized Lucas polynomial L n (x) as follows: L 0 (x)=2, L 1 (x)=x, and L n + 1 (x)=x L n (x)+ L n 1 (x) for all n1.

It is clear that this polynomial is a second-order linear recurrence polynomial, it is satisfying the computational formula:

L n (x)= ( x + x 2 + 4 2 ) n + ( x x 2 + 4 2 ) n .

L n (1)= L n is the well-known Lucas sequence; L n (2)= Q n is the Lucas-Pell sequence. About the properties of this sequence and related contents, some authors had studied them, and obtained many interesting results, see [13]. In this paper, we use the elementary method and the reciprocity theorem of Dedekind sums to study the computational problem of one kind Dedekind sums, and obtain some interesting identities related to Dedekind sums and the second-order linear recurrence polynomials. For convenience, we first give the definition of the Dedekind sums S(h,q) as follows:

For a positive integer q and integer h with (q,h)=1, the classical Dedekind sum S(h,q) is defined by

S(h,q)= a = 1 q ( ( a q ) ) ( ( a h q ) ) ,

where

( ( x ) ) = { x [ x ] 1 2 , if  x  is not an integer ; 0 , if  x  is an integer .

This sum describes the behaviour of the logarithm of eta-function (see [4]) under modular transformations. About its other properties and applications, see [58]. For example, Carlitz [5] proved the reciprocity theorem

S(h,q)+S(q,h)= h 2 + q 2 + 1 12 h q 1 4 ,
(1)

where h>0, q>0 and (h,q)=1.

In this paper, we shall give an exact computational formula for S( L n (x), L n + 1 (x)). That is, we shall prove the following two theorems.

Theorem 1 For any integers n0 and odd number x1, we have the computational formula

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) = 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) + x 3 6 x 2 + 5 x 24 24 ( x 2 + 4 ) .

Theorem 2 For any integers n0 and odd number x1, we have the computational formula

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) = 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + x 24 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 .

From the theorems, we may immediately deduce the following two corollaries.

Corollary 1 For any positive integer n, we have the identities

S( L n 1 , L n )= { 1 10 L 2 m L 2 m + 1 1 5 , if  n = 2 m + 1 ; 1 15 L 2 m 1 L 2 m + 1 30 , if  n = 2 m .

Corollary 2 For any odd number x1, we have the limits

lim n S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) = 1 24 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 and lim n S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) = 1 24 x 2 + 5 6 x 2 + 4 x 2 + 4 .

In our theorems, x must be a positive odd number. If x is an even number, then ( L n (x), L n + 1 (x))==(2,x)=2. This time, the situation is more complex, it is very difficult for us to give an exact computational formula for S( L n (x), L n + 1 (x)).

2 Proof of the theorems

In this section, we shall prove our theorems directly. First, we prove Theorem 1. It is clear that for any positive integer n and odd number x, we have ( L n (x), L n + 1 (x))=( L n 1 (x), L n (x))==( L 0 (x), L 1 (x))=(2,x)=1. So, by reciprocity theorem (1), we have

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) + S ( L 2 n + 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ x L 2 n ( x ) + L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) + L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + 1 L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) ] + x 12 1 4 .
(2)

Similarly, we also have the identity

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) + S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] + x 12 1 4 .
(3)

Note that S( L 2 n (x), L 2 n 1 (x))=S( L 2 n 2 (x), L 2 n 1 (x)) and S( L 2 n + 1 (x), L 2 n (x))=S( L 2 n 1 (x), L 2 n (x)), from identities (2) and (3), we have

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) S ( L 2 n 2 ( x ) , L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] = 1 12 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) x L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] = 1 12 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + x x 3 + 4 x ( L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) ] = 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] .
(4)

From (4), we may immediately deduce the recurrence formula

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) = S ( L 2 n 2 ( x ) , L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) .
(5)

Using (5), repeatedly, and note that formula (1) and S(x,2)=0, we have

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) = = S ( L 0 ( x ) , L 1 ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 0 ( x ) L 1 ( x ) = S ( 2 , x ) 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 2 x = x 2 + 5 24 x 1 4 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 2 x = x 3 6 x 2 + 5 x 24 24 ( x 2 + 4 )

or

S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n + 1 ( x ) ) = 1 12 x 2 + 5 x 2 + 4 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) + x 3 6 x 2 + 5 x 24 24 ( x 2 + 4 ) .

This proves Theorem 1.

Now, we prove Theorem 2. From the method of proving (2), we have

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) + S ( L 2 n ( x ) , L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ x L 2 n 1 ( x ) + L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) ] + x 12 1 4
(6)

and

S ( L 2 n 2 ( x ) , L 2 n 1 ( x ) ) + S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n 2 ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) + L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ x L 2 n 2 ( x ) + L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) + L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ] 1 4 = 1 12 [ L 2 n 2 ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) + L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ] + x 12 1 4 .
(7)

Note that S( L 2 n (x), L 2 n 1 (x))=S( L 2 n 2 (x), L 2 n 1 (x)), S( x 2 +2,x)=S(2,x), S(x,2)=0, from (1), (6) and (7), we have

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n 2 ( x ) ) = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) + 1 L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 1 ( x ) 1 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ] = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) x L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ] = 1 12 [ L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) 1 x 2 + 4 ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) ) ] = 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) )

or

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) = S ( L 2 n 3 ( x ) , L 2 n 2 ( x ) ) 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 L 2 n 3 ( x ) L 2 n 2 ( x ) = = S ( x , x 2 + 2 ) 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 x x 2 + 2 = S ( x , x 2 + 2 ) + S ( x 2 + 2 , x ) S ( 2 , x ) S ( x , 2 ) 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 x x 2 + 2 = x 2 + ( x 2 + 2 ) 2 + 1 12 x ( x 2 + 2 ) x 2 + 5 24 x 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 x x 2 + 2 = x 24 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4

or

S ( L 2 n 1 ( x ) , L 2 n ( x ) ) = 1 12 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) + x 24 x 2 + 3 x 2 + 4 .

This completes the proof of Theorem 2.

Note that the definition of L n (x), x>1, and the limit

lim n + L 2 n ( x ) L 2 n + 1 ( x ) = lim n + L 2 n 1 ( x ) L 2 n ( x ) = 2 x + x 2 + 4 = x + x 2 + 4 2 ,

from our theorems, we may immediately deduce Corollary 2.

References

  1. Yi Y, Zhang W: Some identities involving the Fibonacci polynomials. Fibonacci Q. 2002, 40: 314-318.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma R, Zhang W: Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2007, 45: 164-170.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohtsuka H, Nakamura S: On the sum of reciprocal Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2008/2009, 46/47: 153-159.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rademacher H:On the transformation of logη(τ). J. Indian Math. Soc. 1955, 19: 25-30.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlitz L: The reciprocity theorem of Dedekind sums. Pac. J. Math. 1953, 3: 513-522. 10.2140/pjm.1953.3.513

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia C: On the mean value of Dedekind sums. J. Number Theory 2001, 87: 173-188. 10.1006/jnth.2000.2580

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang W: A note on the mean square value of the Dedekind sums. Acta Math. Hung. 2000, 86: 275-289. 10.1023/A:1006724724840

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W: On the mean values of Dedekind sums. J. Théor. Nr. Bordx. 1996, 8: 429-442. 10.5802/jtnb.179

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referee for his very helpful and detailed comments, which have significantly improved the presentation of this paper. This work is supported by the P.S.F. (2013JZ001, 2013KJXX-34) and the N.S.F. (11071194) of P.R. China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianghua Li.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JL carried out the exact computational formula for S( L n (x), L n + 1 (x)), S( L 2 n 1 (x), L 2 n (x)). HZ participated in the research and summary of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhang, H. Some identities related to Dedekind sums and the second-order linear recurrence polynomials. Adv Differ Equ 2013, 299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-299

Keywords