- Open Access
Some properties of solutions of a class of systems of complex q-shift difference equations
© Xu and Xuan; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 24 May 2013
- Accepted: 23 July 2013
- Published: 9 September 2013
In view of Nevanlinna theory, we study the properties of systems of two types of complex difference equations with meromorphic solutions. Some results of this paper improve and extend previous theorems given by Gao, and five examples are given to show the extension of solutions of the system of complex difference equations.
- difference equation
- transcendental meromorphic function
In this note, we will investigate the problem of the existence and growth of solutions of complex difference equations. The fundamental results and the standard notations of the Nevanlinna value distribution theory of meromorphic functions will be used (see [1–3]). Besides, for the meromorphic function f, denotes any quantity satisfying that for all r outside a possible exceptional set E of finite logarithmic measure , and a meromorphic function is called a small function with respect to f if .
In recent years, difference equations, difference product and q-difference in the complex plane ℂ have been an active topic of study. Considerable attention has been paid to the growth of solutions of difference equations, value distribution and uniqueness of differences analogues of Nevanlinna’s theory [4–8]. Chiang and Feng  and Halburd and Korhonen  established a difference analogue of the logarithmic derivative lemma independently. After their work, a number of results on meromorphic solutions of complex difference equations were obtained.
The structure of this paper is as follows. In Section 1 , some results on growth of solutions of a complex difference equation are listed, and our theorems are given. In Section 2 , we introduce some lemmas. Section 3 is devoted to proving Theorem 1.5. Section 4 is devoted to proving Theorem 1.6. Finally, Section 5 gives some examples to show the accuracy of conclusions of Theorem 1.5.
In 2003, Silvennoinen considered  the growth and existence of meromorphic solutions of functional equations of the form , and obtained the following result.
Theorem 1.1 
where g is an entire function, , are small meromorphic functions with respect to f. Then, g is a polynomial.
Theorem 1.2 
are irreducible rational functions, , , and are small functions.
Theorem 1.3 
then the components and in have at least one rational function, where , .
In 2005, Laine et al.  investigated several higher order difference equations. In particular, they obtained the following result.
Theorem 1.4 
In this paper, we study the question above and the problem of the existence of meromorphic solutions for a system of complex difference equations (3), where is a polynomial, and obtain the following results.
- (i)if and . We have(4)
- (ii)if and , then(5)
if and , then ,
where is the lower order of f.
Lemma 2.1 (Valiron-Mohon’ko )
where and .
Lemma 2.2 
where is a collection of all non-empty subsets of .
Lemma 2.3 
Lemma 2.4 
Let , be monotone increasing functions such that outside of an exceptional set E with the finite linear measure, or , , where is a set of the finite logarithmic measure. Then, for any , there exists such that for all .
Lemma 2.6 
Suppose that (), where μ (), m (), A (), B are constants. Then with , unless and ; and if and , then for any , .
Suppose that (with the notation of (i)) (). Then for all sufficiently large values of r, with , for some positive constant K.
From the assumptions of Theorem 1.5, we know that and are transcendental meromorphic functions.
Hence, (4) holds.
where , are the sets of the finite logarithmic measure.
which implies that (5) is true.
Case 3.3 and . By using the same argument as in Case 3.1, we can get .
From Cases 3.1-3.3, the proof of Theorem 1.5 is completed.
Next, we will prove that . Suppose that , then we can get . For sufficiently small , we have . This contradicts the condition on the transcendency of , .
Thus, the proof of Theorem 1.6 is completed.
The following examples show that the conclusions (4) and (5) in Theorem 1.5 are sharp.
where , and . This example shows that the equality in (4) can be achieved.
where , and . This example shows that the inequality (4) is true.
where , and . This example shows that the equality in (5) can be achieved.
where , and . This example shows that the inequality in (5) is true.
We have . Thus, it shows that (iii) in Theorem 1.5 is true when , , , and .
The authors thank the referee for his/her valuable suggestions to improve the present article. This project is supported by the NNSF of China (11301233, 61202313) and the Natural Science foundation of Jiangxi Province in China (No. 2010GQS0119, No. 20122BAB201016 and No. 20132BAB211001). The second author is supported in part by the NNSFC (Nos. 11226089, 11201395, 61271370), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 1132013) and The Project of Construction of Innovative Teams and Teacher Career Development for Universities and Colleges Under Beijing Municipality (CIT and TCD20130513).
- Hayman WK: Meromorphic Functions. Clarendon, Oxford; 1964.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Yang L: Value Distribution Theory. Springer, Berlin; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Yi HX, Yang CC: Uniqueness Theory of Meromorphic Functions. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2003. Chinese original: Science Press, Beijing (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
- Barnett DC, Halburd RG, Korhonen RJ, Morgan W: Nevanlinna theory for the q -difference operator and meromorphic solutions of q -difference equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 2007, 137: 457–474.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gundersen GG: Finite order solutions of second order linear differential equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1988, 305: 415–429. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0920167-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heittokangas J, Korhonen R, Laine I, Rieppo J, Tohge K: Complex difference equations of Malmquist type. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2001, 1: 27–39.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heittokangas J, Korhonen R, Laine I, Rieppo J, Zhang JL: Value sharing results for shifts of meromorphic functions, and sufficient conditions for periodicity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 355: 352–363. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.01.053MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JL, Korhonen R:On the Nevanlinna characteristic of and its applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 369: 537–544. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.03.038MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiang YM, Feng SJ:On the Nevanlinna characteristic of and difference equations in the complex plane. Ramanujan J. 2008, 16: 105–129. 10.1007/s11139-007-9101-1MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halburd RG, Korhonen RJ: Difference analogue of the lemma on the logarithmic derivative with applications to difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 314: 477–487. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.04.010MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silvennoinen H: Meromorphic solutions of some composite functional equations. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. Diss. 2003, 13: 14–20.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Gao LY: On meromorphic solutions of a type of system of composite functional equations. Acta Math. Sci., Ser. B 2012, 32(2):800–806.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao LY: Systems of complex difference equations of Malmquist type. Acta Math. Sin. 2012, 55: 293–300.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Laine I, Rieppo J, Silvennoinen H: Remarks on complex difference equations. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2005, 5(1):77–88. 10.1007/BF03321087MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu HY, Cao TB, Liu BX: The growth of solutions of systems of complex q -shift difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012., 2012: Article ID 216Google Scholar
- Xu HY, Tu J, Zheng XM: Some properties of solutions of complex q -shift difference equations. Ann. Pol. Math. 2013, 108: 289–304. 10.4064/ap108-3-6MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang H, Xu HY, Liu BX: The poles and growth of solutions of systems of complex difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 75Google Scholar
- Xu HY, Liu BX, Tang KZ: Some properties of meromorphic solutions of systems of complex q -shift difference equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 680956Google Scholar
- Laine I: Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Differential Equations. de Gruyter, Berlin; 1993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergweiler W, Ishizaki K, Yanagihara N: Growth of meromorphic solutions of some functional equations I. Aequ. Math. 2002, 63(1/2):140–151.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein R: Some results on factorisation of meromorphic functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1971, 4(2):357–364.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein R: On meromorphic solutions of certain functional equations. Aequ. Math. 1978, 18: 112–157. 10.1007/BF01844071MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ablowitz MJ, Halburd R, Herbst B: On the extension of the Painleve property to difference equations. Nonlinearity 2000, 13: 889–905. 10.1088/0951-7715/13/3/321MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gundersen GG, Heittokangas J, Laine I, Rieppo J, Yang D: Meromorphic solutions of generalized Schröder equations. Aequ. Math. 2002, 63: 110–135. 10.1007/s00010-002-8010-zMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.