Skip to main content

Reliable L 1 control of positive switched systems with time-varying delays

Abstract

This paper deals with the reliable L 1 control problem of positive switched systems with time-varying delays. Under the case where both stable and unstable subsystems coexist, sufficient conditions are proposed to guarantee the exponential stability of positive switched systems with time-varying delays, and the average dwell time approach is utilized for the stability analysis. The result is also extended to solve the reliable L 1 control problem. All the results are formulated in a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), which can be easily verified or implemented. The obtained theoretical results are demonstrated by a numerical example.

1 Introduction

Switched systems, a type of hybrid dynamical systems, are composed of a number of subsystems and a switching signal which defines a specific subsystem being activated during a certain interval. Many real-world systems such as mechanical systems, automotive industry, aircraft and air traffic control systems as well as chemical processes can be modeled as such systems [13].

Very recently, positive switched systems, whose states and outputs are nonnegative whenever the initial conditions and inputs are nonnegative, have been highlighted and investigated by many researchers due to their broad applications in communication systems [4, 5], viral mutation dynamics under drug treatment [6], formation flying [7] and system theory [812], to mention a few. So far, many useful results for positive switched systems have been obtained in the literature, particularly with respect to the stability analysis [1316]. However, it should be noted that, although many recent control engineering and mathematics works on switched systems have appeared [17, 18], there are still many open questions relating to positive switched systems.

In practice, time delay phenomenon is frequently encountered in engineering and social systems, and the existence of it may cause undesirable performance in feedback systems such as chaos [19, 20]. Therefore, many results have been reported for time-delay systems [2124] over the past years, but not until recently have the positive switched systems with time delays become a topic of major interest.

On the other hand, the popularity of studying a reliable control problem is raised for the growing demands of system reliability in aerospace and industrial process. When controlling a real plant with failures of control components, classical control methods may not achieve satisfactory performance. To overcome this problem, reliable control has made great progress recently. Among the existing studies, the problem of robust reliable control for uncertain switched nonlinear systems with time delays is addressed in [25], and a reliable control method for uncertain switched systems with time-varying delays and actuators faults is presented in [26]. It should be pointed out that the aforementioned results are based on a basic assumption that the subsystems are all stable. Due to the fact that unstable subsystems cannot be avoided in many applications, the reliable stabilization problems for switched systems with faulty actuators are solved in [2729] under the restrictions that not all subsystems are stable. However, to the best of our knowledge, the issue of reliable L 1 control for positive switched systems with stable and unstable subsystems has not been fully investigated, which motivates us to carry out the present work.

In this paper, we focus our attention on the reliable L 1 control problem of positive switched delayed systems with both stable and unstable subsystems. The main contribution of this paper lies in three aspects. Firstly, by using the average dwell time approach, stability conditions are proposed for positive switched delayed systems with both stable and unstable subsystems. Secondly, L 1 -gain performance analysis for the underlying systems is developed. Thirdly, a reliable controller is derived to guarantee the exponential stability with L 1 -gain property of the resulting closed-loop systems.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the necessary definitions and lemmas are reviewed. Section 3 is devoted to deriving the results on stability, L 1 -gain property analysis and controller design. An example is provided to illustrate the feasibility of the obtained results in Section 4. Concluding remarks are given in Section 5.

Notations In this paper, A0 (0) means that all entries of matrix A are non-negative (non-positive); A0 (0) means that all entries of A are positive (negative); AB (AB) means that AB0 (AB0); A T denotes the transpose of matrix A; R ( R + ) is the set of all real (positive real) scalars; R n ( R + n ) is an n-dimensional real (positive) vector space. The notation x= l = 1 n | x l |, where x l is the l th element of x R n .

2 Problem statements and preliminaries

Consider the following switched linear systems with time-varying delays:

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A σ ( t ) x ( t ) + A d σ ( t ) x ( t d ( t ) ) + E σ ( t ) w ( t ) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , θ [ τ , 0 ] , z ( t ) = C σ ( t ) x ( t ) + D σ ( t ) w ( t ) ,
(1)

where x(t) R n and z(t) R p denote the state and controlled output, respectively; w(t) R q is the disturbance input; σ(t):[0,) N ̲ ={1,2,,N} is the switching signal with N being the number of subsystems; A i , A d i , C i , D i and E i , i N ̲ , are constant matrices with appropriate dimensions; φ(θ) is a vector-valued initial function defined on the interval [τ,0], τ>0; t 0 is the initial time, and t k denotes the k th switching instant; d(t) denotes the time-varying delay satisfying 0d(t)τ, d ˙ (t)d for known constants τ and d.

Assumption 1 The exogenous noise signal w(t) is time-varying and w(t) L 1 [ t 0 ,), that is,

t 0 w ( t ) dt<ϖ,ϖ0.

Next, we will give the positive definition for switched system (1).

Definition 1 System (1) is said to be positive if, for any initial conditions φ(θ)0, θ[τ,0], w(t)0 and any switching signals σ(t), the corresponding state trajectory x(t)0 and controlled output z(t)0 hold for all t0.

Definition 2[30]

A is called a Metzler matrix, if the off-diagonal entries of matrix A are non-negative.

The following lemma can be obtained from Lemma 3 in [14] and Proposition 1 in [13].

Lemma 1 System (1) is positive if and only if A i , i N ̲ , are Metzler matrices and A d i 0, E i 0, C i 0, D i 0, i N ̲ .

Definition 3[31]

System (1) is said to be exponentially stable under a switching signal σ(t) if for the initial condition x( t 0 +θ)=φ(θ), θ[τ,0], there exist constants κ>0, ε>0 such that the solution of the system satisfies x(t)κ x t 0 c e ε ( t t 0 ) , t t 0 , where x t 0 c = sup t 0 τ δ t 0 x(δ).

Definition 4[32]

For a switching signal σ(t) and T 2 > T 1 0, let N σ ( T 1 , T 2 ) denote the switching number of σ(t) over the interval [ T 1 , T 2 ). For given T a >0, N 0 0, if the inequality

N σ ( T 1 , T 2 ) N 0 +( T 2 T 1 )/ T a

holds, then T a is called the average dwell time and N 0 is the chattering bound.

As commonly used in the literature, we choose N 0 =0 in this paper.

Definition 5[33]

System (1) is said to have L 1 -gain performance index γ under a switching signal σ(t), if the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. (i)

    System (1) is exponentially stable when w(t)0;

  2. (ii)

    Under zero initial conditions, i.e., x(t)=0, t[ t 0 τ, t 0 ], the following inequality holds for all nonzero w(t) L 1 [ t 0 ,):

    t 0 e α ( t t 0 ) z ( t ) dtγ t 0 w ( t ) dt.
    (2)

Remark 1 In Definition 5, index γ characterizes the disturbance attenuation performance. The smaller γ is, the better the performance is.

When the control input with actuator failures is considered, system (1) can be written as

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A σ ( t ) x ( t ) + A d σ ( t ) x ( t d ( t ) ) + B σ ( t ) u f ( t ) + E σ ( t ) w ( t ) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , θ [ τ , 0 ] , z ( t ) = C σ ( t ) x ( t ) + D σ ( t ) w ( t ) ,
(3)

where x(t) R n , w(t) R q , z(t) R p ; u f (t) R m is the control input with actuator failures. Actuator failures are assumed to occur within a prescribed subset of control input channel. We classify actuators of system (3) into two groups. One is a set of actuators susceptible to failures, denoted by M{1,2,,m}. The other is a set of actuators robust to failures, denoted by M ¯ , i.e., the complementary set of M. A i , A d i , B i , C i , D i and E i , i N ̲ , are constant matrices with appropriate dimensions. According to the classification of actuators, we have the decomposition B i =[ B i M B i M ¯ ], i N ̲ , where B i M and B i M ¯ are formed from B i corresponding to M and M ¯ , respectively.

Assume that the actuator faults are modeled as u M (t) whose elements correspond to the set of faulty actuators M. Denote w ¯ (t)= [ w T ( t ) u M T ( t ) ] T , where w ¯ (t) can be considered as a new disturbance input vector. System (3) with the following state feedback control law:

u(t)= K σ ( t ) x(t), K i =( K i M K i M ¯ ),i N ̲ ,
(4)

becomes

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A ¯ σ ( t ) x ( t ) + A d σ ( t ) x ( t d ( t ) ) + E ¯ σ ( t ) w ¯ ( t ) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , θ [ τ , 0 ] , z ( t ) = C σ ( t ) x ( t ) + D ¯ σ ( t ) w ¯ ( t ) ,
(5)

where A ¯ i = A i + B i M ¯ K i M ¯ , E ¯ i =[ E i B i M ], D ¯ i =[ D i 0], i N ̲ .

The purpose of this paper is: (1) to find a switching signal σ(t) under which positive switched system (1) is exponentially stable with L 1 -gain performance; (2) to design a state feedback controller for positive switched system (3) such that resulting closed-loop system (5) is exponentially stable and has L 1 -gain performance index γ.

3 Main results

3.1 Stability analysis

In this section, two necessary lemmas are given firstly for the following non-switched positive system:

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A x ( t ) + A d x ( t d ( t ) ) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , θ [ τ , 0 ] ,
(6)

where A is a Metzler constant matrix and A d 0 is a constant matrix; d(t) denotes the time-varying delay satisfying 0d(t)τ, d ˙ (t)d; φ(θ)0.

Choose the co-positive type Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional candidate for system (6) as follows:

V ( t , x ( t ) ) = V 1 ( t , x ( t ) ) + V 2 ( t , x ( t ) ) + V 3 ( t , x ( t ) ) ,
(7)

where

and v,υ,ϑ R + n , α>0.

For the sake of simplicity, V(t,x(t)) is written as V(t) in this paper.

Lemma 2 For a given positive constant α, if there exist vectorsv,υ,ϑ R + n andς R n such that

(8)
(9)

where

with a r ( a d r ) represents the rth column vector of matrix A ( A d ), andv= [ v 1 , v 2 , , v n ] T , υ= [ υ 1 , υ 2 , , υ n ] T , ϑ= [ ϑ 1 , ϑ 2 , , ϑ n ] T , ς= [ ς 1 , ς 2 , , ς n ] T , v r ( υ r , ϑ r , ς r )represents the rth element of the vectorv(υ,ϑ,ς). Then along the trajectory of system (6), we have

V(t) e α ( t t 0 ) V( t 0 ).

Proof Along the trajectory of system (6), for the co-positive type Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (7), we have

(10)

Using the Leibniz-Newton formula, one has

t d ( t ) t x ˙ (s)ds=x(t)x ( t d ( t ) ) .
(11)

Considering that

t d ( t ) t x ˙ (s)ds= t d ( t ) t ( A x ( s ) + A d x ( s d ( s ) ) ) ds,
(12)

the following relationship can be obtained for any vector ς R n :

( x ( t ) x ( t d ( t ) ) t d ( t ) t ( A x ( s ) + A d x ( s d ( s ) ) ) d s ) T ς=0.
(13)

From (10) and (13), we have

V ˙ ( t ) + α V ( t ) x T ( t ) ( A T v + α v + υ + τ ϑ ) + ς + x T ( t d ( t ) ) ( A d T v ( 1 d ) e α τ υ ς ) t d ( t ) t [ x ( s ) x ( s d ( s ) ) ] T ( [ A T ς A d T ς ] + [ e α τ ϑ 0 ] ) d s .
(14)

One can obtain from (8) and (9) that

(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)

It follows that

V ˙ (t)αV(t).

Then, along the trajectory of system (6), we have

V(t) e α ( t t 0 ) V( t 0 ).

 □

Lemma 3 Consider system (6), for a given positive constant β, if there exist vectorsv,υ,ϑ R + n andς R n such that

(19)
(20)

where

a r ( a d r ) represents the rth column vector of matrix A ( A d ); andv= [ v 1 , v 2 , , v n ] T , υ= [ υ 1 , υ 2 , , υ n ] T , ϑ= [ ϑ 1 , ϑ 2 , , ϑ n ] T , ς= [ ς 1 , ς 2 , , ς n ] T . Then, along the trajectory of system (6), we have

V(t) e β ( t t 0 ) V( t 0 ).

Proof Choose the following co-positive type Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional candidate for system (6):

V(t)= V 1 (t)+ V 2 (t)+ V 3 (t),

where

and v,υ,ϑ R + n , β>0.

The rest of the proof of this lemma is similar to that of Lemma 2, and thus is omitted here. □

Now we are in a position to provide the stability conditions for the following positive switched system:

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A σ ( t ) x ( t ) + A d σ ( t ) x ( t d ( t ) ) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , θ [ τ , 0 ] ,
(21)

where A i , i N ̲ , are Metzler constant matrices and A d i 0, i N ̲ , are constant matrices; d(t) denotes the time-varying delay satisfying 0d(t)τ, d ˙ (t)d; φ(θ)0.

Let Q denote the index set of all stable subsystems, which is a nonempty subset of N ̲ , and Q ¯ denote the index set of all unstable subsystems. Let T + ( t 0 ,t) denote the total activation time of the unstable subsystems during [ t 0 ,t), let T ( t 0 ,t) denote the total activation time of the stable subsystems during [ t 0 ,t), then we have the following result.

Theorem 1 Given positive constants α and β, if there exist v i , υ i , ϑ i R + n and ς i R n , i N ̲ , such that

(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

where

a i r ( a d i r ) represents the rth column vector of matrix A i ( A d i ), i N ̲ ; and v i = [ v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i n ] T , υ i = [ υ i 1 , υ i 2 , , υ i n ] T , ϑ i = [ ϑ i 1 , ϑ i 2 , , ϑ i n ] T , ς i = [ ς i 1 , ς i 2 , , ς i n ] T . Then system (21) is exponentially stable for any switching signalsσ(t)with the average dwell time

inf t > t 0 T ( t 0 , t ) T + ( t 0 , t ) β + λ α λ , T a > T a = ln ( μ η ) λ ,
(26)

whereη= e ( α + β ) τ , 0<λ<αandμ1satisfies

v i μ v j , υ i μ υ j , ϑ i μ ϑ j ,(i,j) N ̲ × N ̲ .
(27)

Proof

Choose the following piecewise co-positive type Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional candidate:

V(t)= V σ ( t ) (t).

Let t 1 << t l denote the switching instants of σ(t) over the interval [ t 0 ,t). By Lemmas 2 and 3, one can obtain from (22)-(25) that

V σ ( t ) (t){ e α ( t t k ) V σ ( t k ) ( t k ) if  σ ( t ) Q , t [ t k , t k + 1 ) , e β ( t t k ) V σ ( t k ) ( t k ) if  σ ( t ) Q ¯ , t [ t k , t k + 1 ) .
(28)

From (27) and the co-positive type Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, at the switching instants t k , k=1,2,,l, it is obtained that

V i ( t k )μη V j ( t k ) ,(i,j) N ̲ × N ̲ ,
(29)

where η= e ( α + β ) τ .

By (26), (28), (29) and Definition 4, for t[ t l , t l + 1 ), it is not hard to get

V σ ( t ) ( t ) e α T ( t l , t ) + β T + ( t l , t ) V σ ( t l ) ( t l ) μ η e α T ( t l , t ) + β T + ( t l , t ) V σ ( t l ) ( t l ) μ η e α T ( t l 1 , t ) + β T + ( t l 1 , t ) V σ ( t l 1 ) ( t l 1 ) ( μ η ) N σ ( t 0 , t ) e α T ( t 0 , t ) + β T + ( t 0 , t ) V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 ) e α T ( t 0 , t ) + β T + ( t 0 , t ) e ( t t 0 ) ln ( μ η ) / T a V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 ) e ( λ ln ( μ η ) / T a ) ( t t 0 ) V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 ) .
(30)

Denoting ε 1 = min ( r , i ) n ̲ × N ̲ { v i r } yields

V σ ( t ) (t) ε 1 x ( t ) .
(31)

Denote

and a=max{ a 1 , a 2 }, then

V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 )a sup t 0 τ δ t 0 x ( δ ) .
(32)

From (30)-(32), we obtain

(33)

Thus, by denoting κ=a/ ε 1 , ε=λ ln ( μ η ) T a >0, it can be seen from (33) that x(t)κ x t 0 c e ε ( t t 0 ) , t t 0 , where x t 0 c = sup t 0 τ δ t 0 x(δ). Therefore, we can conclude that system (21) is exponentially stable for any switching signal with average dwell time (26). □

Remark 2 In Theorem 1, sufficient conditions for the existence of the exponential stability for positive switched system (21) with both stable and unstable subsystems are presented via the average dwell time approach. It is shown by (26) that when the average dwell time is sufficiently large and the total activation time of unstable subsystems is relatively small compared with that of stable subsystems, the stability of the system can be guaranteed.

3.2 L 1 -gain property analysis

Theorem 2 Given positive constants α, β and γ, if there exist v i , υ i , ϑ i R + n and ς i R n , i N ̲ , such that

(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)

where

e i r represents the rth column vector of matrix E i , i N ̲ . Then system (1) is exponentially stable and has L 1 -gain performance index γ for any switching signalσ(t)with the average dwell time (26).

Proof It is easy to get that (22)-(25) can be deduced from (34)-(37). According to Theorem 1, system (1) with w(t)=0 is exponentially stable. In the sequel, we will prove that the L 1 -gain performance of system (1) is guaranteed.

Let t 1 << t l denote the switching instants of σ(t) over the interval [ t 0 ,t). Following the proof line of Theorem 1, one can obtain from (34)-(37) that

V σ ( t ) (t){ e α ( t t k ) V σ ( t k ) ( t k ) t k t e α ( t s ) Γ ( s ) d s if  σ ( t ) Q , t [ t k , t k + 1 ) , e β ( t t k ) V σ ( t k ) ( t k ) t k t e β ( t s ) Γ ( s ) d s if  σ ( t ) Q ¯ , t [ t k , t k + 1 ) ,
(38)

where Γ(s)=z(s)γw(s).

Then, for t[ t l , t l + 1 ), we have

V σ ( t ) ( t ) e α T ( t l , t ) + β T + ( t l , t ) V σ ( t l ) ( t l ) t l t e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ ( s ) d s μ η e α T ( t l , t ) + β T + ( t l , t ) V σ ( t l ) ( t l ) t l t e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ ( s ) d s μ η e α T ( t l 1 , t ) + β T + ( t l 1 , t ) V σ ( t l 1 ) ( t l 1 ) t l t e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ ( s ) d s μ η t l 1 t l e α T ( s , t l 1 ) + β T + ( s , t l 1 ) Γ ( s ) d s ( μ η ) N σ ( t 0 , t ) e α T ( t 0 , t ) + β T + ( t 0 , t ) V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 ) t 0 t ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ ( s ) d s e α T ( t 0 , t ) + β T + ( t 0 , t ) e ( t t 0 ) ln ( μ η ) / T a V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 ) t 0 t ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ ( s ) d s .
(39)

Under the zero initial condition, we have V σ ( t 0 ) ( t 0 )=0, then (39) becomes

0 t 0 t ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) e α T ( s , t ) + β T + ( s , t ) Γ(s)ds.

From the condition (26), it is obvious that

α T ( t 0 ,t)+β T + ( t 0 ,t)λ(t t 0 ),

then

t 0 t e λ ( t s ) ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) Γ(s)ds0.

That is,

t 0 t e λ ( t s ) ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) z ( s ) dsγ t 0 t e λ ( t s ) ( μ η ) N σ ( s , t ) w ( s ) ds.
(40)

Multiplying both sides of (40) by e N σ ( t 0 , t ) ln ( μ η ) yields

t 0 t e λ ( t s ) e N σ ( t 0 , s ) ln ( μ η ) z ( s ) dsγ t 0 t e λ ( t s ) e N σ ( t 0 , s ) ln ( μ η ) w ( s ) ds.
(41)

By Definition 4 and condition (26), one can obtain

t 0 t e λ ( t s ) e λ ( s t 0 ) z ( s ) dsγ t 0 t e λ ( t s ) w ( s ) ds.
(42)

Integrating both sides of (42) from t= t 0 to ∞ leads to

t 0 e λ ( t t 0 ) z ( s ) dsγ t 0 w ( s ) ds.

This means that system (1) achieves L 1 -gain performance index γ.

The proof is completed. □

3.3 Reliable L 1 control

In what follows, we design a state feedback controller for positive switched system (3) such that resulting closed-loop system (5) is exponentially stable with L 1 -gain performance index γ.

Theorem 3 Consider system (3), for given positive constants α, β and γ, if there exist v i , υ i , ϑ i R + n and ς i , h i R n , i N ̲ , such that

(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)

where

c i r ( d i r ) represents the rth column vector of matrix C i ( D i ), i N ̲ ; b i M ¯ r ( b i M r ) represents the rth column vector of matrix B i M ¯ ( B i M i ); h i = [ h i 1 , h i 2 , , h i n ] T , f i = [ f i 1 , f i 2 , , f i n ] T .

Then, under the controller (4), resulting closed-loop system (5) is exponentially stable and has L 1 -gain performance index γ for any switching signalsσ(t)with the average dwell time (26).

Proof Under the controller (4), the resulting closed-loop system can be written as (5).

Denote A ¯ i = A i + B i M ¯ K i M ¯ , E ¯ i =[ E i B i M ], D ¯ i =[ D i 0] and h i = K i M ¯ T B i M ¯ T v i , f i = K i M ¯ T B i M ¯ T ς i , then by Theorem 2, one can obtain from (43)-(46) that closed-loop system (5) is exponentially stable and has L 1 -gain performance index γ. This completes the proof. □

We now present the following algorithm for the construction of the reliable L 1 state feedback controller.

Algorithm 1 Step 1. Input the matrices A i , A d i , B i , C i , D i and E i , i N ̲ ;

Step 2. By adjusting parameters α and β, we can find the solutions of v i , υ i , ϑ i , ς i , h i such that (43) and (45) hold;

Step 3. From h i = K i M ¯ T B i M ¯ T v i and h i = K i M T B i M T v i , one can obtain the gain matrices K i = [ K i M T K i M ¯ T ] T , and then substitute K i into (44) and (46). If inequalities (44) and (46) hold and A ¯ i = A i + B M ¯ i K M ¯ i are Metzler matrices, then go to Step 4; otherwise, go back to Step 2;

Step 4. With v i , υ i , ϑ i , the switching signal σ(t) can be obtained by (26) and (27);

Step 5. Construct the feedback controller (4), where K i are gain matrices obtained in Step 3.

4 Numerical example

Consider positive switched system (3) with the following parameters:

By Lemma 1, the trajectories of such a system will remain positive if φ(θ)0, θ[τ,0]. From Lemma 6 in [14], it is easy to verify that the first subsystem is unstable. Taking α=0.3, β=0.9, λ=0.1, γ=1.0 and solving the matrix inequalities (43) and (45) in Theorem 3 gives rise to

Then, by Step 3 in Algorithm 1, the state feedback gain matrices can be obtained as follows:

By substituting them into (44) and (46), it is not hard to find that inequalities (44) and (46) are satisfied and A ¯ i = A i + B i M ¯ K i M ¯ , i=1,2, are Metzler matrices. Then, according to (26) and (27), we can get μ=1.2890, η=1.1275 and T a =3.7387. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed results, let us now generate the switching sequences by the average dwell time T a =3.8. We can obtain the state responses shown in Figures 1 and 2 with the initial condition x(0)= [ 0.2 0.3 ] T , x(θ)=0, θ[τ,0), and the switching signal shown in Figure 3. From Figures 1-3, we can see that the state of the closed-loop system is convergent.

Figure 1
figure1

State responses of the system under the closed-loop case.

Figure 2
figure2

State responses of the system under the open-loop case.

Figure 3
figure3

Switching signal.

5 Conclusions

In this paper, the reliable L 1 control problem for positive switched systems with time-varying delays has been discussed. The system studied in this paper consists of stable and unstable subsystems with actuators failures. Using the average dwell time approach, we have proposed a reliable feedback controller and a class of switching signals under which the positive switched system is exponentially stable and has L 1 -gain performance for all admissible actuator failures. All the results are formulated in the set of LMIs which can be easily verified or implemented. Our future work will focus on the reliable L 1 control problem for discrete-time positive switched systems with time-varying delays.

References

  1. 1.

    Wong W, Brockett RW: Systems with finite communication bandwidth constraints. I. State estimation problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1997, 42(9):1294–1299. 10.1109/9.623096

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tomlin C, Pappas GJ, Sastry S: Conflict resolution for air traffic management: a study in multiagent hybrid systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1998, 43(4):509–521. 10.1109/9.664154

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Varaiya P: Smart cars on smart roads: problems of control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1993, 38(2):195–207. 10.1109/9.250509

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shorten R, Wirth F, Leith D: A positive systems model of TCP-like congestion control: asymptotic results. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2006, 14(3):616–629.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shorten R, Leith D, Foy J, Kilduff R: Towards an analysis and design framework for congestion control in communication networks. Proceedings of the 12th Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hernandez-Varga E, Middleton R, Colaneri P, Blanchini F: Discrete-time control for switched positive systems with application to mitigating viral escape. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2011, 21(10):1093–1111. 10.1002/rnc.1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jadbabaie A, Lin J, Morse A: Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2003, 48(6):988–1001. 10.1109/TAC.2003.812781

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kaczorek T: The choice of the forms of Lyapunov functions for a positive 2D Roesser model. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 2007, 17(4):471–475.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kaczorek T: A realization problem for positive continuous-time systems with reduced numbers of delays. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 2007, 16(3):325–331.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Benvenuti L, Santis A, Farina L (Eds): Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences In Positive Systems. Springer, Berlin; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rami M, Tadeo F, Benzaouia A: Control of constrained positive discrete systems. Proceedings of American Control Conference 2007, 5851–5856.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rami M, Tadeo F: Positive observation problem for linear discrete positive systems. Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2006, 4729–4733.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao X, Zhang L, Shi P: Stability of a class of switched positive linear time-delay systems. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2012. doi:10.1002/rnc.2777

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu X, Dang C: Stability analysis of positive switched linear systems with delays. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2011, 56(7):1684–1690.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fornasini E, Valcher M: Stability and stabilizability of special classes of discrete-time positive switched systems. Proceedings of American Control Conference 2011, 2619–2624.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhao X, Zhang L, Shi P, Liu M: Stability of switched positive linear systems with average dwell time switching. Automatica 2012, 48(6):1132–1137. 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.008

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xiang W, Xiao J: Stability analysis and control synthesis of switched impulsive systems. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2012, 22(13):1440–1459. 10.1002/rnc.1757

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xiang W, Xiao J, Iqbal MN:Asymptotic stability, L 2 gain, boundness analysis, and control synthesis for switched systems: a switching frequency approach. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 2012, 26(4):350–373. 10.1002/acs.1287

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ucar A: A prototype model for chaos studies. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2002, 40(2):251–258.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ucar A: On the chaotic behavior of a prototype delayed dynamical system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2003, 16(2):187–194. 10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00160-1

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Karimi HR, Gao H:New delay-dependent exponential H synchronization for uncertain neural networks with mixed time delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part B, Cybern. 2010, 40(1):173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mahmoud MS, Shi P:Robust stability, stabilization and H control of time-delay systems with Markovian jump parameters. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2003, 13(8):755–784. 10.1002/rnc.744

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Xiang Z, Wang R: Non-fragile observer design for nonlinear switched systems with time delay. Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern. 2009, 2(1):175–189. 10.1108/17563780910939291

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Xiang ZR, Wang RH: Robust control for uncertain switched non-linear systems with time delay under asynchronous switching. IET Control Theory Appl. 2009, 3(8):1041–1050. 10.1049/iet-cta.2008.0150

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Xiang Z, Wang R: Robust reliable control for uncertain switched nonlinear systems with time delay. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation 2008, 5487–5491.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Song Y, Xiang Z, Chen Q, Hu W: Robust reliable control of switched uncertain systems with time-varying delay. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2006, 37(15):1077–1087. 10.1080/00207720600879658

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xiang Z, Sun YN, Chen Q: Robust reliable stabilization of uncertain switched neutral systems with delayed switching. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217(23):9835–9844. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.04.082

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xiang Z, Wang R, Chen Q: Robust reliable stabilization of stochastic switched nonlinear systems under asynchronous switching. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217(19):7725–7736. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.076

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li L, Feng J, Dimirovski GM, Zhao J:Reliable stabilization and robust H control for switched systems with faulty actuators: an average dwell time approach. Proceedings of American Control Conference 2009, 1072–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mason O, Shorten R: On linear copositive Lyapunov functions and the stability of switched positive linear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2007, 52(7):1346–1349.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sun X, Wang W, Liu G, Zhao J: Stability analysis for linear switched systems with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part B, Cybern. 2008, 38(2):528–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hespanha JP, Morse AS: Stability of switched systems with average dwell time. 3. Proceedings of the 38rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 1999, 2655–2660.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xiang M, Xiang Z:Stability, L 1 -gain and control synthesis for positive switched systems with time-varying delay. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2013, 9(1):9–17.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 60974027 and 61273120.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengrong Xiang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MX carried out the main results of this article and drafted the manuscript. ZX directed the study and helped inspection. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiang, M., Xiang, Z. Reliable L 1 control of positive switched systems with time-varying delays. Adv Differ Equ 2013, 25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-25

Download citation

Keywords

  • reliable control
  • positive systems
  • switched systems
  • time-varying delays
  • LMI