Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Homoclinic solutions for a forced generalized Liénard system

Abstract

In this article, we find a special class of homoclinic solutions which tend to 0 as t±, for a forced generalized Liénard system x ¨ + f 1 (x) x ˙ + f 2 (x) x ˙ 2 +g(x)=p(t). Since it is not a small perturbation of a Hamiltonian system, we cannot employ the well-known Melnikov method to determine the existence of homoclinic solutions. We use a sequence of periodically forced systems to approximate the considered system, and find their periodic solutions. We prove that the sequence of those periodic solutions has an accumulation which gives a homoclinic solution of the forced Liénard type system.

MSC:34A34, 34C99.

1 Introduction

As a special bounded solution, homoclinic solution is one of important subject in the study of qualitative theory of differential equations. In recent decades, many works (see e.g., [15]) contributed to homoclinic solutions and heteroclinic solutions for small perturbation of integrable systems, where either the Melnikov method or the Liapunov-Schmidt reduction was used.

As indicated in [6, 7], an orbit is referred to as a heteroclinic orbits if it connects two different equilibria. It is called a homoclinic orbit if the two equilibria coincide. For autonomous Hamiltonian systems homoclinic (heteroclinic) orbits can be found from the invariant surfaces (curves) of identical energy containing saddles. In 1990, Rabinowitz [8] considered a nonautonomous Hamiltonian system

q ¨ + V q (t,q)=0,
(1)

where tRq:R R n and V:R× R n R is a differentiable function such that V(t,0)0, and gave the existence of its homoclinic solutions. His strategy is to construct a sequence of periodic auxiliary systems to approximate the Hamiltonian system (1), and apply the variational method (see e.g., [9, 10]) to obtain periodic solutions for those auxiliary equations, and prove that the desired homoclinic solution is just an accumulation of those periodic solutions. Later, several different types of Hamiltonian system were also studied for homoclinic orbits (see e.g., [11, 12]). Based on these works, some efforts were made to find homoclinic orbits for nonlinear systems with a time-dependent force. Izydorek and Janczewska [13] considered (1) with a bounded time-dependent force f(t)i.e.

q ¨ + V q (t,q)=f(t),
(2)

where tRq:R R n and V:R× R n R and f:R R n , and found a solution q 0 (t) which satisfies

( q 0 ( t ) , q ˙ 0 ( t ) ) (0,0)ast±.
(3)

In addition, they also found in [14] such a kind of special solutions for a similar equation to (2). As pointed in [14], the limit (0,0) is not a solution of the system, they called the solution in (3) is homoclinic to zero. Later, some authors studied the existence of this special solution of some Hamiltonian systems (see e.g., [1417]).

To deal with some non-Hamiltonian systems with a time-dependent force, which is independent of the state variable but cannot be regarded as a small perturbation, the topological degree theory [18, 19] and the fixed point theory [20, 21] are also applied to give the existence of periodic solutions and almost periodic solutions. Applying the Rabinowitz’s strategy and the fixed point theory, Zhang [22] considered the existence of homoclinic solutions to the equation

x ¨ +f(x) x ˙ +g(x)=p(t),

by studying the convergence of a series of periodic solutions to the auxiliary periodic systems, he got a homoclinic solution which is an accumulation of the series of periodic solutions.

In this article, we consider the existence of homoclinic solutions of the forced generalized Liénard type system

x ¨ + f 1 (x) x ˙ + f 2 (x) x ˙ 2 +g(x)=p(t),
(4)

where f 1 f 2 and g are continuous functions on R and p is a bounded continuous function on R. This generalized equation is frequently encountered as a mathematical model of most dynamics processes in electromechanical systems of physics and engineering [23]. When f 2 (x)0, the equation becomes the equation in [22].

Equation (4) is equivalent to the system

x ˙ = y , y ˙ = [ f 1 ( x ) + f 2 ( x ) y ] y g ( x ) + p ( t ) ,
(5)

or

x ˙ = 1 a ( x ) [ y b ( x ) ] , y ˙ = a ( x ) [ g ( x ) p ( t ) ] ,
(6)

where

a(x)=exp ( 0 x f 2 ( s ) d s ) ,b(x)= 0 x a(τ) f 1 (τ)dτ.

There are some results of boundedness and the oscillation of the solutions to Equation (4) [2430]. In 2007, Hesaaraki and Moradifam [31] studied the global asymptotic and oscillation and existence of periodic solution to a type of generalized Liénard system

x ˙ = 1 a ( x ( t ) ) [ h ( y ( t ) ) b ( x ( t ) ) ] , y ˙ = a ( x ( t ) ) g ( x ( t ) ) .

In 2009, by using the theory of topological degree, Zhou et al.[32] got the uniqueness of periodic solution to the system

x ˙ = 1 a ( x ( t ) ) [ h ( y ( t ) ) b ( x ( t ) ) ] , y ˙ = a ( x ( t ) ) [ g ( x ( t ) ) e ( t ) ] .

To study the existence of homoclinic solutions to Equation (4), we still use a sequence of periodic forced systems to approximate Equation (4), and find their periodic solutions. Because our system and those approximating systems are not Hamiltonian, we use the fixed point theory and Massera’s theorem (see [33]) instead of the variational method in finding those periodic solutions. We prove that the sequence of those periodic solutions has an accumulation which gives an homoclinic solution of the forced Liénard type system. We need the following hypotheses: (H1) = p is nonzero and continuous bounded function on R and p:= sup t R |p(t)|=b>0, where ba,1a:= sup t R a(x)<+, such that kZ, p(k)=p(k).; (H2) = For each x,yR, there exists a constant r>0 such that | f i (x) f i (y)|r|xy| (i=1,2) and f 1 (x)| f 2 (x)|(M+ a M 2 )a, where M=max{ M 0 ,2,b}, M 0 = g 1 (b).; (H3) = g C 1 (R,R), g(0)=0, g(±)=± and 0< g (x) a M for each xR..

Our main result will be given as follows.

Theorem 1.1 Suppose that conditions (H1)-(H3) hold. Then system (4) has a nontrivial homoclinic solutionx(t), which satisfies that(x(t), x ˙ (t))(0,0)ast±.

When f 2 (x)0, the conditions of Theorem 1.1 are not equivalent to the conditions of the results in [22]. Obviously, let

f 1 (x)8, f 2 (x)= e | x | ,

and

g(x)= 1 2 x,p(t)=cosπt.

Then we get

a=e,b=1,M=2,

and the conditions (H1)-(H3) hold.

2 Proof of theorem

Lemma 2.1 Suppose that the conditions (H1)-(H3) hold, there is a region D surrounded by a Jordan curve, such that every solution of (4) which starts from the point of D is bounded uniformly.

Proof Let D be the closure of the region surrounded by the closed curve

Γ:= A B ¯ B C ¯ C D ¯ D A ¯ A B ¯ B C ¯ C D ¯ D A ¯

as shown in Figure 1, where

Figure 1
figure 1

Region D .

Let Ξ:={(x,y,t)|(x,y)D,tR}. For every t 0 R, ( x 0 , y 0 )Γ, we claim that q k (t, t 0 , x 0 , y 0 )Ξ for all t> t 0 . We only need to prove this claim for every solution starting with the cylindrical surface Γ×R.

If ( x 0 , y 0 ) A B ¯ , by (H2), we have

Then the curve cannot leave Ξ from A B ¯ ×R for t> t 0 .

If ( x 0 , y 0 ) B C ¯ , since xM, by (H2), we have |g(x)|b. Then

Then the curve cannot leave Ξ from B C ¯ ×R for t> t 0 .

If ( x 0 , y 0 ) C D ¯ , from x ˙ =y>0, so the curve cannot leave Ξ from C D ¯ ×R for t> t 0 .

If ( x 0 , y 0 ) D A ¯ , by (H2),(H3), we have

y ˙ = f 1 ( x ) y f 2 ( x ) y 2 g ( x ) + p ( t ) = ( M + a 2 M ) [ f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( x ) ( M + a 2 M ) ] g ( x ) + p ( t ) ( M + a 2 M ) [ f 1 ( x ) + | f 2 ( x ) | ( M + a 2 M ) ] g ( x ) + p ( t ) a ( M + a 2 M ) g ( M M a ) + a a ( M + a 2 M ) + a M ( M + M a ) + a a ( M + a 2 M ) + 2 a + 1 a ( M 2 ) a 2 M 2 + 1 0 .

Then the curve cannot leave Ξ from D A ¯ ×R for t> t 0 .

Since the region D is symmetrical, we can prove that the curve cannot leave Ξ from A B ¯ B C ¯ C D ¯ D A ¯ ×R for t> t 0 . Then we complete the proof of the claim and this lemma. □

From the combination of Lemma 2.2 and the Massera’s theorem (see [33]), we have the following lemma.

Lemma 2.2 Suppose that (H1)-(H3) hold, and p is a T-periodic function. Then (4) has a T-periodic solutionx(t)satisfying|x(t)|+| x ˙ (t)|B, where B depends on D.

Remark 2.3 From the construction of D, we can take (2+ 1 a + a 2 )M as a value of B in Lemma 2.2.

Now we consider the following two periodic equations

x ¨ + f 1 (x) x ˙ + f 2 (x) x ˙ 2 +g(x)=p(t),
(7)

and

x ¨ + f 1 (x) x ˙ + f 2 (x) x ˙ 2 +g(x)=ϕ(t),
(8)

where p is ω 1 -periodic function and ϕ is ω 2 -periodic function. Suppose that all conditions in Theorem 2.1 hold and

sup t R | p ( t ) | sup t R | ϕ ( t ) | <+.

Then, we obtain two periodic solutions ( x 1 (t), x ˙ 1 (t)) of (7) and ( x 2 (t), x ˙ 2 (t)) of (8), from the construction of D in Theorem 2.1, we can obtain two Jordan domains D p of (7) and D ϕ of (8) such that D p D ϕ . The trajectory of ( x 1 (t), x ˙ 1 (t)) is contained in D p and the trajectory of ( x 2 (t), x ˙ 2 (t)) is contained in D ϕ . Hence, we can find a region D 0 which is independent of D p and contains both the two trajectories.

For each kN, let p k :RR be a 2k-periodic function such that p k (t)=p(t) for all t[k,k]. Since p(k)=p(k) as indicated in (H1), we see that p k is continuous on the whole R. Now, we consider a series of periodic equations

x ¨ + f 1 (x) x ˙ + f 2 (x) x ˙ 2 +g(x)= p k (t),

or periodic systems

x ˙ = y , y ˙ = [ f 1 ( x ) + f 2 ( x ) y ] y g ( x ) + p k ( t ) .
(9)

Noting that sup t R | p k (t)| sup t R |p(t)|<+ for every kN, and from the discussion above we can get results as follows.

Lemma 2.4 Suppose that conditions (H1)-(H3) hold. Then system (9) possesses a 2k-periodic solution q k for everykN. Moreover, there exists a constant B independent of k such that| q k |:= max t [ k , k ] {| x k (t)|,| y k (t)|}B.

Now, for the sequence of periodic solutions { q k } k N determined in Lemma 2.4, we obtain the following lemma by using the Ascoli-Arzela theorem.

Lemma 2.5 There exist a subsequence { q i } i N of { q k } k N and continuous functions q 0 :R R 2 and q ˜ 0 :R R 2 such that q i q 0 , q ˙ i q ˜ 0 , asi+, in C b (R, R 2 ).

Proof For each t, t 0 R, t t 0 , by Lemma 2.4, there exists a constant B 1 >0 such that | f 1 ( x k (s)) y k (s) f 2 (x(s)) y k 2 (s)g( x k (s))| B 1 . We note that

and

For | y ˙ k (t) y ˙ k ( t 0 )|, since x k (t) is bounded, we can define

max | f ( x k ( t ) ) | := r 1 0.

By the conditions (H2), we can get the estimation as follows.

Let

max | f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) ( y k ( t ) + y k ( t 0 ) ) | := r 2 0,

we have

| f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x k ( t 0 ) ) y k 2 ( t 0 ) | = | f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t ) + f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x k ( t 0 ) ) y k 2 ( t 0 ) | | f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t ) f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t 0 ) | + | f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) y k 2 ( t 0 ) f 2 ( x k ( t 0 ) ) y k 2 ( t 0 ) | | f 2 ( x k ( t ) ) ( y k ( t ) + y k ( t 0 ) ) | | y k ( t ) y k ( t 0 ) | + | y k 2 ( t 0 ) | | f 2 ( x ) f 2 ( x k ( t 0 ) ) | r 2 | y k ( t ) y k ( t 0 ) | + B 2 r | x k ( t ) x k ( t 0 ) | [ r 2 ( B 1 + b ) + B 3 r ] | t t 0 | .

Moreover, by (H3), we have

| g ( x k ( t ) ) g ( x k ( t 0 ) ) | a M | x k ( t ) x k ( t 0 ) | B a M |t t 0 |.

Since p is continuous and bounded, there is a constant r 3 >0 such that

| p k ( t ) p k ( t 0 ) | r 3 |t t 0 |.

Hence, we obtain

| y ˙ k ( t ) y ˙ k ( t 0 ) | { [ r 1 ( B 1 + b ) + B 2 r ] + [ r 2 ( B 1 + b ) + B 3 r ] + B a M + r 3 } |t t 0 |.

So { q k } k N and { q ˙ k } k N are both equicontinuous. On the other hand, from Lemma 2.4, { q k } k N is bounded uniformly, and so does { q ˙ k } k N . Hence we obtain the existence of a subsequence { q i } i N convergent to a certain q 0 :=( x 0 (t), y 0 (t)) in C b (R, R 2 ) by Ascoli-Arzela theorem. □

Remark 2.6 We cannot conclude that the convergence of the subsequence { q i } i N is uniform for tR. However, for every a,bR, a<b, the uniform convergence holds on [a,b].

To be convenient, we still represent { q i } i N by { q k }. For each kN, let E 2 k C b (R,R), denote the Banach space of continuous 2k-periodic functions on R with values in R under the norm

x E k = ( k k | x ( t ) | 2 d t ) 1 2 .

Now, we prove the main result that q 0 is the desired homoclinic solution of (5).

Lemma 2.7 The function q 0 determined by Lemma 2.5 is a nontrivial homoclinic solution of (5).

Proof The proof will be divided into three steps.

Step 1. We show that q 0 is a solution of (9). For every kN and tR we have

x k ˙ = y k , y k ˙ = [ f 1 ( x k ) + f 2 ( x k ) y k ] y k g ( x k ) + p k ( t ) .
(10)

For each fixed a,bR, a<b, since q k q 0 and p k p on [a,b] uniformly, we have

q ˙ k = ( d x k ( t ) d t , d y k ( t ) d t ) w : = ( y 0 ( t ) , [ f 1 ( x 0 ( t ) ) + f 2 ( x 0 ( t ) ) y 0 ( t ) ] y 0 ( t ) g ( x 0 ( t ) ) + p ( t ) )
(11)

on [a,b] uniformly. Hence there exists a constant k 0 N such that (10) can be transformed into

x k ˙ = y k , y k ˙ = [ f 1 ( x k ) + f 2 ( x k ) y k ] y k g ( x k ) + p ( t )

for each k k 0 and t[a,b]. So q ˙ k is continuous on [a,b] for k k 0 . Note the fact that q ˙ k is a derivative of q k in [a,b] for every k k 0 and q ˙ k converges to q ˜ 0 uniformly in [a,b] by Lemma 2.5. Since (11) holds and q k q 0 uniformly on [a,b], we have w= q ˙ 0 in (a,b). Because a and b are arbitrary, we conclude that w= q ˙ 0 in R and q 0 satisfies (5). Moreover, we have actually proved that { q k } converges to q 0 in C b (R, R 2 ).

Step 2. We prove that x 0 (t)0, as t±. We note that

x k ˙ x k ¨ =g( x k ) x k ˙ f 1 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) 2 f 2 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) 3 + p k (t) x k ˙ ,
(12)

by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, we have

x ˙ k M+ a M 2 ,

from (H2), we obtain

f 1 ( x k )+ f 2 ( x k ) x k ˙ f 1 ( x k ) | f 2 ( x k ) | ( M + a M 2 ) a.

Integrating (12) from −k to k, we have

k k ( f 1 ( x k ) + f 2 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) ) ( x k ˙ ) 2 dt= k k p k (t) x k ˙ dt.

So

a x k ˙ E k 2 | k k ( f 1 ( x k ) + f 2 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) ) ( x k ˙ ) 2 d t | p k E k x k ˙ E k .

Hence, by (H1), there is a constant d 1 >0 independent of k such that

x k ˙ E k = y k E k d 1 .
(13)

On the other hand, we have

x k x k ¨ =g( x k ) x k f 1 ( x k ) x k ˙ x k f 2 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) 2 x k + p k (t) x k .
(14)

From Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, there exists a constant m 1 >0 independent of k such that

| f 2 ( x k ) ( x k ˙ ) 2 | m 1 .

Let m 2 = min ( x , x ˙ ) D g (x), since g (x)>0, we have m 2 >0 and |g( x k )| m 2 | x k |. Integrating (14) from −k to k, we have

d 1 2 = x k ˙ E k 2 = k k ( x k ˙ ) 2 dt m 2 x k E k 2 ( m 1 +b) x k .

Then there exists a constant d 2 >0 independent of k such that

x k E k d 2 .
(15)

We note that

x 0 L 2 2 = lim i + i i | x 0 ( t ) | 2 dt= lim i + lim k + i i | x k ( t ) | 2 dt.

Obviously,

i i | x k ( t ) | 2 dt k k | x k ( t ) | 2 dt= x k E k 2 d 2 2

holds for every iN and kN, ki. Since x k x 0 on [i,i] uniformly. Let k+, we obtain

i i | x 0 ( t ) | 2 dt d 2 2 ,

and let i+, we have

+ | x 0 ( t ) | 2 dt d 2 2 .

Hence,

lim r | t | r | x 0 ( t ) | 2 dt=0.
(16)

This implies that x 0 (t)0 as t±. Similarly, y 0 (t)0 as t±.

Step 3. p(t)0 implies that q 0 is nontrivial.

We complete this lemma. □

Finally, Theorem 1.1 is proved by summarizing the results in Lemmas 2.1 and 2.7.

References

  1. Buica A, Gasull A, Yang J: The third order Melnikov function of a quadratic center under quadratic perturbations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 331: 443–454. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Champneys A, Lord G: Computation of homoclinic solutions to periodic orbits in a reduced water-wave problem. Physica D, Nonlinear Phenom. 1997, 102: 101–124. 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00206-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow S, Hale J, Mallet-Paret J: An example of bifurcation to homoclinic orbits. J. Differ. Equ. 1980, 37: 351–371. 10.1016/0022-0396(80)90104-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Li C, Rousseau C: A system with three limit cycles appearing in a Hopf bifurcation and dying in a homoclinic bifurcation: the cusp of order 4. J. Differ. Equ. 1989, 79: 132–167. 10.1016/0022-0396(89)90117-4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu C, Zhang W: Computation of bifurcation manifolds of linearly independent homoclinic orbits. J. Differ. Equ. 2008, 245: 1975–1994. 10.1016/j.jde.2008.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andronov A, Vitt E, Khaiken S: Teory of Oscillators. Pergamon, Oxford; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P: Nonlinear Oscillation, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer, New York; 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabinowitz P: Homoclinic orbits for a class of Hamiltonian systems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A 1990, 114: 33–38. 10.1017/S0308210500024240

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambrosetti A, Rabinowitz P: Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Funct. Anal. 1973, 14: 349–381. 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow S, Hale J: Methods of Bifurcation Theory. Springer, New York; 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrião P, Miyagaki O: Existence of homoclinic solutions for a class of time-dependent Hamiltonian systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 230: 157–172. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.6184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Szulkin A, Zou W: Homoclinic orbits for asymptotically linear Hamiltonian systems. J. Funct. Anal. 2001, 187: 25–41. 10.1006/jfan.2001.3798

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Izydorek M, Janczewska J: Homoclinic solutions for a class of the second order Hamiltonian systems. J. Differ. Equ. 2005, 219: 375–389. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.06.029

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Izydorek M, Janczewska J: Homoclinic solutions for nonautonomous second order Hamiltonian systems with a coercive potential. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 335: 1119–1127. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.02.038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang X, Xiao L: Homoclinic solutions for nonautonomous second-order Hamiltonian systems with a coercive potential. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 351: 586–594. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.10.038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang X, Xiao L: Homoclinic solutions for a class of second-order Hamiltonian systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 354: 539–549. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.12.052

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y: Homoclinic solutions for a forced Liénard type system. Results Math. 2010, 57: 69–78. 10.1007/s00025-009-0005-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mawhin J, Ward J: Periodic solutions of second order forced Liénard differential equations at resonance. Arch. Math. 1983, 41: 337–351. 10.1007/BF01371406

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Omari P, Villari G, Zanolin F: Periodic solutions of Liénard differential equations with one-sided growth restriction. J. Differ. Equ. 1987, 67: 278–293. 10.1016/0022-0396(87)90151-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Franks J: Generalizations of the Poincaré-Birkhoff theorem. Ann. Math. 1988, 128: 139–151. 10.2307/1971464

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobowitz H:Periodic solutions of x ¨ +f(x,t)=0 via Poincaré-Birkhoff theorem. J. Differ. Equ. 1976, 20: 37–52. 10.1016/0022-0396(76)90094-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y: Eventually vanished solutions of a forced Liénard system. Appl. Math. Mech. 2009, 30(10):1335–1344. 10.1007/s10483-009-1013-6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao MRM: Ordinary Differential Equations. Affiliated East-West Private Limited, London; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Antosiewicz H: On nonlinear differential equations of the second order with integrable forcing term. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1955, 30: 64–67. 10.1112/jlms/s1-30.1.64

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Atslega S, Sadyrbaev F: Multiple period annuli in Liénard type equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23(2):165–169. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang S, Chang H: Existence of periodic solutions of nonlinear systems of a generalized Liénard type. Kyungpook Math. J. 1999, 39(2):351–365.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Esmailzadeh E, Mehri B, Nakhaie-Jazar G: Periodic solution of a second order, autonomous, nonlinear system. Nonlinear Dyn. 1996, 10(4):307–316. 10.1007/BF00045479

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng Z: Exact solutions to the Liénard equation and its applications. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2004, 21: 343–348. 10.1016/j.chaos.2003.10.025

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Qian C: Boundedness and asymptotic behavior of solutions of second order nonlinear system. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 1992, 24: 281–288. 10.1112/blms/24.3.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sansone G, Conti R: Nonlinear Differential Equations. Pergamon, New York; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hesaaraki M, Moradifam A: Intersection with the vertical isocline in the generalized Liénard equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 334(2):787–798. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.015

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou Q, Shao J, Zhou J: Existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions for a class of generalized Liénard systems with forcing term. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 224: 743–750. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.06.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Massera JL: On Liapunoff’s conditions of stability. Ann. Math. 1949, 50: 705–721. 10.2307/1969558

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Sichuan Provincial Department of Education Fund (12ZA068), and the projects of Leshan Normal University (Z1164, Z1006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongxin Zhang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y. Homoclinic solutions for a forced generalized Liénard system. Adv Differ Equ 2012, 94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-94

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-94

Keywords