Skip to main content

Stability and superstability of ternary homomorphisms and ternary derivations on ternary quasi-Banach algebras

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability, Isac-Rassias type stability and superstability of ternary homomorphisms and ternary derivations associated to the generalized m- variables Cauchy-Jensen functional equation

i = 1 m f ( x i ) - 1 2 m i = 1 m f m x i + j = 1 , j i m x j + f i = 1 m x i = 0

for a fixed positive integer m with m ≥ 3 on ternary quasi-Banach algebras.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 39B82; 39B52.

1. Introduction

A functional equation (ξ) is stable if any function g satisfying the equation (ξ) approximately is near to a true solution of (ξ). A functional equation (ξ) is superstable if any function g satisfying the equation (ξ) approximately is a true solution of (ξ).

It is of interest to consider the concept of stability for a functional equation arising when we replace the functional equation by an inequality which acts as a perturbation of the equation.

The first stability problem was raised by Ulam [1] during his talk at the University of Wisconsin in 1940. The stability question of functional equations is that how do the solutions of the inequality differ from those of the given functional equation? If the answer is affirmative, we would say that the equation is stable.

In 1941, Hyers [2] gave a first affirmative answer to the question of Ulam for Banach spaces. Let f : EE' be a mapping between Banach spaces such that

f ( x + y ) - f ( x ) - f ( y ) δ

for all x, y E, and for some δ > 0. Then there exists a unique additive mapping T : EE' such that

f ( x ) - T ( x ) δ

for all x E. Moreover if f(tx) is continuous in t for each fixed x E, then T is linear. Aoki [3] and Bourgin [4] considered the stability problem with unbounded Cauchy differences. In 1978, Rassias [5] provided a generalization of Hyers' theorem by proving the existence of unique linear mappings near approximate additive mappings. It was shown by Gajda [6], as well as by Rassias and Šemrl [7] that one cannot prove a stability theorem of the additive equation for a specific function. Găvruta [8] obtained generalized result of Rassias' theorem which allows the Cauchy difference to be controlled by a general unbounded function.

Bourgin [4] is the first mathematician dealing with stability of (ring) ho-momorphism f(xy) = f(x)f(y). The topic of approximate homomorphisms and approximate derivations was studied by a number of mathematicians (see [913], and references therein).

We refer the readers to [2, 58, 1151] and references therein for more detailed results on the stability problems of various functional equations.

We note that a quasi-norm is a real-valued function on a vector space X satisfying the following properties:

  1. (1)

    ǁx ǁ ≥ 0 for all x X and ǁx ǁ = 0 if and only if x = 0.

  2. (2)

    ǁλ.x ǁ = ǀλ ǀ. ǁx ǁ for all λ and all x X.

  3. (3)

    There is a constant K ≥ 1 such that ǁx + y ǁ ≤ Kx ǁ + ǁy ǁ) for all x, y X. The pair (X, ǁ.ǁ) is called a quasi-normed space if ǁ.ǁ is a quasi-norm on X . A quasi-Banach space is a complete quasi-normed space. A quasi-norm ǁ.ǁ is called a p-norm (0 ≤ p ≤ 1) if

    x + y p x p + y p

for all x, y X . In this case, a quasi-Banach space is called a p-Banach space.

Ternary algebraic operations were considered in the 19th century by several mathematicians such as Cayley [52] who introduced the notion of cubic matrix which in turn was generalized by Kapranov et al. [39]. There are some applications, although still hypothetical, in the fractional quantum Hall effect, the nonstandard statistics, supersymmetric theory, and Yang-Baxter equation. The comments on physical applications of ternary structures can be found in [37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 5259].

Let A be a linear space over a complex field equipped with a mapping []: A3 = A × A × AA with (x, y, z) [x, y, z] that is linear in variables x, y, z and satisfies the associative identity [[x, y, z], u, v] = [x, [y, z, u], v] = [x, y, [z, u, v]] for all x, y, z, u, v in A. The pair (A, [ ]) is called a ternary algebra.

Assume that A is a ternary algebra. We say A has a unit if there exist an element e A such that [e, e, a] = [eae] = [a, e, e] = a for all a A.

Let A be a ternary algebra and let (A, ǁ.ǁ) be a quasi-Banach space (p-Banach space) (with constant K ≥ 1). Then A is called a ternary quasi-Banach algebra (ternary p-Banach algebra) if ǁ[x, y, z] ǁ ≤ K ǁx ǁǁy ǁǁz ǁ for all x, y, z A.

Let A and B be ternary algebras. A -linear mapping H:AB is called a ternary homomorphism if

H ( [ a b c ] ) = [ H ( a ) H ( b ) H ( c ) ]

for all a,b,cA. A -linear mapping δ:AA is called a ternary derivation if

δ ( [ a b c ] ) = [ δ ( a ) b c ] + [ a δ ( b ) c ] + [ a b δ ( c ) ]

for all a,b,cA (see [2531, 46, 60]).

Recently, Ebadian and et al. [61] investigated the solution and stability of functional equation

i = 1 m f ( m x i + j = 1 , j i m x j ) + f ( i = 1 m x i ) = 2 m i = 1 m f ( x i )
(1.1)

for a fixed positive integer m with m ≥ 2 in quasi-Banach spaces. In this paper, we establish the generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of ternary homomorphisms and ternary derivations on ternary quasi-Banach algebras. Moreover, by using the main theorems, we prove the superstability of ternary homomorphisms and ternary derivations on ternary quasi Banach algebras.

Throughout this article, we assume that A is a ternary quasi-Banach algebra with quasi-norm ǁ.ǁ A and B is a ternary p-Banach algebra with quasi-norm ǁ.ǁ B

2. Ternary homomorphisms

From now on, we assume that m, n0 are positive integers m ≥ 3, and suppose that T 1 n o 1 : = { e i θ ; 0 θ 2 π n o } . Moreover, we will use the following abbreviation for a given mapping f : AB:

D μ f ( x 1 , x 2 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = i = 1 m f ( m x i + j = 1 , j i m x j ) + f ( i = 1 m x i ) - 2 m i = 1 m f ( x i ) + f ( [ a b c ] ) - [ f ( a ) f ( b ) f ( c ) ] + f ( μ u ) - μ f ( u )

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x2, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1

Theorem 2.1. Let ϕ : A × × A m + 4 - t i m e s [ 0 , ) be a function satisfying

Ψ ( x ) = i = 1 ( 1 m ) i p ( ϕ ( m i - 1 x , 0 , , 0 ) ) p <

for all x A, and

lim n 1 m n ϕ ( m n x 1 , , m n x m , m n a , m n b , m n c , m n u ) = 0
(2.1)

for all u, a, b, c, x j A (1 ≤ jm). Let f : AB be a mapping such that f(0) = 0 and that

D μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u )
(2.2)

for all u, a, b, c, x j A (1 ≤ jm) and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary homomorphism T : AB such that inequality

f ( x ) - T ( x ) [ Ψ ( x ) ] 1 p
(2.3)

for all x A.

Proof: Putting μ = 1, a = b = c = u = 0 in (2.2), then we have

D 1 f ( x 1 , , x m , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 )

for all x1, x2, ..., x m A. By using the Theorem 2.2 of [61], the limit

lim n 1 m n f ( m n x )

exists for all x A and the mapping

T ( x ) : = lim n 1 m n f ( m n x ) ( x A )

is a unique additive function which satisfies (2.3). Moreover, one can show that T ( x ) = 1 m n T ( m n x ) = 1 m 2 n T ( m 2 n x ) for all x A. Putting a = b = c = x1 = x2 = ... = x m = 0 in (2.2) to get

f ( μ u ) - μ f ( u ) = D μ f ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , u ) ϕ ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , u )

for all u A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then by definition of T and (2.1), we have

T ( μ u ) - μ T ( u ) = lim n 1 m n f ( m n μ u ) - u f ( m n u ) lim n 1 m n ϕ ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , m n u ) = 0

for all u A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . This means that

T ( μ u ) = μ T ( u )

for all u A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . By the same reasoning as that in the proof of Theorem 2.1 of [19], one can show that T : AB is -linear. On the other hand, by putting u = x1 = x2 = ... = x m = 0 in (2.2), we have

f ( [ a b c ] ) - [ f ( a ) f ( b ) f ( c ) ] ϕ ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , a , b , c , 0 )

for all a, b, c A. It follows that

T ( [ a b c ] ) - [ T ( a ) T ( b ) T ( c ) ] = 1 m 2 n T ( [ m 2 n a b c ] ) - [ T ( a ) 1 m n T ( m n b ) 1 m n T ( m n c ) ] = lim n 1 m 3 n f ( [ ( m n a ) ( m n b ) ( m n c ) ] ) - [ ( 1 m n f ( m n a ) ) ( 1 m n f ( m n b ) ) ( 1 m n f ( m n c ) ) ] = lim n 1 m 3 n f ( [ ( m n a ) ( m n b ) ( m n c ) ] ) - [ ( f ( m n a ) ) ( f ( m n b ) ) ( f ( m n c ) ) ] lim n 1 m 3 n ϕ ( 0 , 0 , 0 , m n a , m n b , m n c , 0 ) = 0

for all a, b, c A. This means that T : AB is a ternary homomorphism. The uniqueness of T follows from Theorem 2.2 of [61].

Corollary 2.2. Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers such that 0 < r, r j < 1. Suppose that a mapping f : AB with f(0) = 0 satisfies the inequality

D μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) B θ j = 1 m x j A r j + a A r + b A r + c A r + u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary homomorphism T : AB such that

f ( x ) - T ( x ) B θ x r 1 m r 1 m ( 1 - r 1 ) p m ( 1 - r 1 ) p - 1 1 p

for all x A

Proof: It follows from Theorem 2.1 by putting

ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) = θ j = 1 m x j A r j + a A r + b A r + c A r + u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A.

Now, we investigate the Hyers-Ulam type stability of ternary homomor-phisms on ternary quasi Banach algebras as follows.

Corollary 2.3. Let θ be non-negative real number. Suppose that a mapping f :AB with f(0) = 0 satisfies the inequality

D μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) B θ

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary homomorphism T : AB such that

f ( x ) - T ( x ) B θ 1 m p - 1 1 p

for all x A.

Proof. It follows from Theorem 2.1, by putting

ϕ ( x 1 , x 2 , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = θ

for all u, a, b, c, x1, x2, ..., x m A.

Isac and Rassias [38] generalized the Hyers' theorem by introducing a mapping ψ : ++ subject to the conditions:

  1. 1)

    lim t ψ ( t ) t =0,

  2. 2)

    ψ(ts) ≤ ψ(t)ψ(s);   s, t > 0,

  3. 3)

    ψ(t) < t;   t > 1.

These stability results can be applied in stochastic analysis [38], financial and actuarial mathematics, as well as in psychology and sociology. The following corollary is Isac-Rassias type stability of ternary homomorphisms on ternary quasi-Banach algebras.

Corollary 2.4. Let ψ : ++ be a mapping such that

lim t ψ ( t ) t = 0 , ψ ( t s ) ψ ( t ) ψ ( s ) s , t > 0 , ψ ( t ) < t t > 1 .

Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers. Let f : AB be a mapping such that f(0) = 0 and that

D μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) B θ j = 1 m ψ ( x j A ) + ψ ( a A ) + ψ ( b A ) + ψ ( c A ) + ψ ( u A )

for all u, a, b, c, x1, x2, ..., x m A. Then there exists a unique ternary homo-morphism T : AB such that

f ( x ) - T ( x ) B k θ ψ ( m - 1 ) ψ ( x )

for all x A, where k= ψ ( m ) m - ψ ( m ) .

Proof: The proof follows from Theorem 2.1 by taking

ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = θ j = i m ψ ( x j A ) + ψ ( a A ) + ψ ( b A ) + ψ ( c A ) + ψ ( u A )

for all u, a, b, c, x1, x2,..., x m A.

Moreover, we have the superstability of ternary homomorphisms on ternary quasi Banach algebras as follows.

Corollary 2.5. Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers such that 0 < r, r j < 1. Suppose that a mapping f : AB with f(0) = 0 satisfies the inequality

D μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) B θ j = 1 m x j A r j a A r b A r c A r u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then f : A → B is a ternary homomorphism.

Proof: Putting

ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = θ j = 1 m x j A r j a A r b A r c A r u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A. Then we have ϕ(x, 0, 0, ..., 0) = 0. By Theorem 2.1, there exists a unique ternary homomorphism T : AB such that

f ( x ) - T ( x ) B [ Ψ ( x ) ] 1 p = 0

for all x A. This means that f(x) = T(x) for all x A. Hence f : AB is a ternary homomorphism.

3. Ternary derivations

In this section, we use the following abbreviation for a given mapping f : AA:

Δ μ f ( x 1 , x 2 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = i = 1 m f m x i + j = 1 , j i m x j + f i = 1 m x i - 2 m i = 1 m f ( x i ) + f ( [ a b c ] ) - [ f ( a ) b c ] - [ a f ( b ) c ] - [ a b f ( c ) ] + f ( μ u ) - μ f ( u )

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x2, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 .

Theorem 3.1. Let ϕ : A × × A m + 4 - t i m e s [ 0 , ) be a function satisfying

Ψ ( x ) = i = 1 ( 1 m ) i p ( ϕ ( m i - 1 x , 0 , , 0 ) ) p <

for all x A, and

lim n 1 m n ϕ ( m n x 1 , . . . , m n x m , m n a , m n b , m n c , m n u ) = 0

for all u, a, b, c, x j A (1 ≤ jm). Let f : AB be a mapping such that f(0) = 0 and that

Δ μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u )
(3.1)

for all u, a, b, c, x j A (1 ≤ jm) and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary derivation D : AB such that

f ( x ) - D ( x ) [ Ψ ( x ) ] 1 p

for all x A.

Proof: By using the same technique of proving Theorem 2.1, the limit

lim n 1 m n f ( m n x )

exists for all x A and the mapping

D ( x ) : = lim n 1 m n f ( m n x ) ( x A )

is a unique -linear function which satisfies (2.3). On the other hand, by putting u = x1 = x2 = = x m = 0 in (3.1), we have

f ( [ a b c ] ) - [ f ( a ) b c ] - [ a f ( b ) c ] - [ a b f ( c ) ] ϕ ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , a , b , c , 0 )

for all a, b, c A. It follows that

D ( [ a b c ] ) - [ D ( a ) b c ] - [ a D ( b ) c ] - [ a b D ( c ) ] = 1 m 2 n D ( [ m 2 n a b c ] ) - D ( a ) 1 m n ( m n b ) 1 m n ( m n c ) - 1 m n ( m n a ) D ( b ) 1 m n ( m n c ) - 1 m n D ( m n a ) 1 m n ( m n b ) D ( c ) = lim n 1 m 3 n f ( [ ( m n a ) ( m n b ) ( m n c ) ] ) - 1 m n f ( m n a ) 1 m n ( m n b ) 1 m n ( m n c ) - 1 m n ( m n a ) 1 m n f ( m n b ) 1 m n ( m n c ) - 1 m n ( m n a ) 1 m n ( m n b ) 1 m n f ( m n c ) = lim n 1 m 3 n f ( [ ( m n a ) ( m n b ) ( m n c ) ] ) - [ ( f ( m n a ) ) ( ( m n b ) ) ( ( m n c ) ) ] - [ ( ( m n a ) ) ( f ( m n b ) ) ( ( m n c ) ) ] - [ ( ( m n a ) ) ( ( m n b ) ) ( f ( m n c ) ) ] lim n 1 m 3 n ϕ ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , m n a , m n b , m n c , 0 ) = 0

for all a, b, c A. This means that D : AB is a ternary derivation.

Corollary 3.2. Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers such that 0 < r, r j < 1. Suppose that a mapping f : AB with f(0) = 0 satisfies the inequality

Δ μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) A θ ( j = 1 m x j A r j + a A r + b A r + c A r + u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary derivation D : AB such that

f ( x ) - D ( x ) A θ x r 1 m r 1 m ( 1 - r 1 ) p m ( 1 - r 1 ) p - 1 1 p

for all x A.

Proof: It follows from Theorem 3.1 by putting

ϕ ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) = θ j = 1 m x j A r j + a A r + b A r + c A r + u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A.

We have the Hyers-Ulam type stability of ternary derivations on ternary quasi Banach algebras as follows.

Corollary 3.3. Let θ be non-negative real number. Suppose that a mapping f :AB with f(0) = 0 satisfies the inequality

Δ μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) A θ

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then there exists a unique ternary derivation D : AB such that

f ( x ) - D ( x ) A θ 1 m p - 1 1 p

for all x A.

Proof. It follows from Theorem 3.1, by putting

ϕ ( x 1 , x 2 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) : = θ

for all u, a, b, c, x1, x2, ..., x m A.

By using the same technique of proving Corollary 2.4, we can prove the Isac-Rassias type stability of ternary derivations on ternary quasi-Banach algebras as follows.

Corollary 3.4. Let ψ : ++ be a mapping such that

lim t ψ ( t ) t = 0 , ψ ( t s ) ψ ( t ) ψ ( s ) s , t > 0 , ψ ( t ) < t t > 1 .

Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers. Let f : AA be a mapping such that f(0) = 0 and that

Δ μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) A θ j = 1 m ψ ( x j A ) + ψ ( a A ) + ψ ( b A ) + ψ ( c A ) + ψ ( u A )

for all u, a, b, c, x1, x2, ..., x m A. Then there exists a unique ternary derivation D: AA such that

f ( x ) - D ( x ) A k θ ψ ( m - 1 ) ψ ( x )

for all x A, where k= ψ ( m ) m - ψ ( m ) .

Similar to Corollary 2.5, we can prove the superstability of ternary derivations on ternary quasi-Banach algebras as follows.

Corollary 3.5. Let θ, r, r j (1 ≤ jm) be non-negative real numbers such that 0 < r, r j < 1. Let f: AA be a mapping such that f(0) = 0 and that

Δ μ f ( x 1 , , x m , a , b , c , u ) A θ j = 1 m x j A r j a A r b A r c A r u A r

for all a, b, c, u, x1, x1, ..., x m A and all μ T 1 n o 1 . Then f : AA is a ternary derivation.

References

  1. 1.

    Ulam SM: A Collection of the Mathematical Problems. Interscience Publishers, New York; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1941, 27: 222–224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Aoki T: On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces. J Math Soc Jpn 1950, 2: 64–66. 10.2969/jmsj/00210064

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bourgin DG: Classes of transformations and bordering transformations. Bull Am Math Soc 1951, 57: 223–237. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1951-09511-7

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rassias ThM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proc Am Math Soc 1978, 72: 297–300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gajda Z: On stability of additive mappings. Int J Math Math Sci 1991, 14: 431–434. 10.1155/S016117129100056X

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rassias ThM, Šemrl P: On the behavior of mappings which do not satisfy Hyers-Ulam stability. Proc Am Math Soc 1992, 114: 989–993. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1992-1059634-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Găvruta P: A generalization of the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of approximately additive mappings. J Math Anal Appl 1994, 184: 431–436. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1211

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Badora R: On approximate ring homomorphisms. J Math Anal Appl 2002, 276: 589–597. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00293-7

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Badora R: On approximate derivations. Math Inequal Appl 2006, 9: 167–173.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hyers DH, Rassias ThM: Approximate homomorphisms. Aequationes Math 1992, 44: 125–153. 10.1007/BF01830975

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Miura T, Hirasawa G, Takahasi SE: A perturbation of ring derivations on Banach algebras. J Math Anal Appl 2006, 319: 522–530. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.060

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Park C: Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of homomorphisms in quasi-Banach algebras. Bull Sci Math 2008, 132(2):87–96. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2006.07.004

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ebadian A, Ghobadipour N, Eshaghi Gordji M: A fixed point method for perturbation of bimultipliers and Jordan bimultipliers in C *-ternary algebras. J Math Phys 2010, 51: 103508. 10.1063/1.3496391

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ebadian A, Ghobadipour N, Banand Savadkouhi M, Eshaghi Gordji M: Stability of a mixed type cubic and quartic functional equation in non-Archimedean -fuzzy normed spaces. Thai J Math 2011, 9(2):225–241.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ebadian A, Ghobadipour N, Rassias ThM, Eshaghi Gordji M: Functional inequalities associated with cauchy additive functional equation in non-Archimedean spaces. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2011., 2011: Article ID 929824

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ebadian A, Ghobadipour N, Rassias ThM, Nikoufar I: Stability of generalized derivations on Hilbert C* -modules associated to a pexiderized Cuachy-Jensen type functional equation. Acta Mathematica Scintia 2012, 32(3):1226–1238. 10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60094-0

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ebadian A, Najati A, Eshaghi Gordji M: On approximate additive-quartic and quadratic-cubic functional equations in two variables on abelia groups. Results Math 2010, 58: 39–53. 10.1007/s00025-010-0018-4

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Eshaghi Gordji M: Nearly involutions on Banach algebras: a fixed point approach. Fixed Point Theory, in press.

  20. 20.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Bavnd Savadkouhei M: Approximation of generalized homomor-phisms in quasi-Banach algebras. Analele Univ Ovidius Constata, Math series 2009, 17(2):203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Ghobadipour N: Nearly generalized Jordan derivations. Math Slo-vaca 2011, 61(1):1–8. 10.2478/s12175-010-0055-1

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Ghobadipour N: Stability of ( α , β , γ )-derivations on Lie C*- algebras. Int J Geometric Methods Modern Phys 2010, 7(7):1093–1102. 10.1142/S0219887810004737

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Rassias JM, Ghobadipour N: Generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of generalized (n,k)--derivations. Abst Appl Anal 2009, 8. 2009, Article ID 437931

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Ghobadipour N: Approximately quartic homomorphisms on Banach algebras. Word Appl Sci J, in press.

  25. 25.

    Eshaghi Gordji M: Nearly ring homomorphisms and nearly ring derivations on non-Archimedean Banach algebras. Abst Appl Anal 2010, 2010: 12. Article ID 393247

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Alizadeh Z: Stability and superstability of ring homomorphisms on non-Archimedean Banach algebras. Abst Appl Anal 2011, 2011: 10. Article ID 123656

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Ghaemi MB, Kaboli Gharetapeh S, Shams S, Ebadian A: On the stability of J *-derivations. J Geometry Phys 2010, 60(3):454–459. 10.1016/j.geomphys.2009.11.004

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Kaboli Gharetapeh S, Savadkouhi MB, Aghaei M, Karimi T: On cubic derivations. Int J Math Anal 2010, 4(51):2501–2514.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Karimi T, Kaboli Gharetapeh S: Approximately n -Jordan homo-morphisms on Banach algebras. J Ineq Appl 2009, 2009: 8. Article ID 870843

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Eshaghi Gordji M, Moslehian MS: A trick for investigation of approximate derivations. Math Commun 2010, 15(1):99–105.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Farokhzad R, Hosseinioun SAR: Perturbations of Jordan higher derivations in Banach ternary algebras: an alternative fixed point approach. Int J Nonlinear Anal Appl 2010, 1(1):42–53.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Eskandani GZ: On the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of an additive functional equation in quasi-Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2008, 345: 405–409. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.039

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gavruta P, Gavruta L: A new method for the generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability. Int J Nonlinear Anal Appl 2010, 1(2):11–18.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gajda Z, Ger R: Subadditive multifunctions and Hyers-Ulam stability. In General Inequalities, vol. 5. International Schriftenreiche Numer Math 80. Birkhuser, Basel-Boston, MA; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gruber PM: Stability of isometries. Trans Am Math Soc 1978, 245: 263–277.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ghobadipour N, Ebadian A, Rassias ThM, Eshaghi M: A perturbation of double derivations on Banach algebras. Commun Math Anal 2011, 11(1):51–60.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Haag R, Kastler D: An algebraic approach to quantum field theory. J Math Phys 1964, 5: 848–861. 10.1063/1.1704187

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Isac G, Rassias ThM: Stability of ψ -additive mappings: applications to nonlinear analysis. Int J Math Math Sci 1996, 19: 219–228. 10.1155/S0161171296000324

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kapranov M, Gelfand IM, Zelevinskii A: Discrimininants. Resultants and Multidimensional Determinants. Birkhauser, Berlin; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kerner R: The cubic chessboard. Geometry Phys Class Quant Grav 1997, 14: A203-A225.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Malliavin P: Stochastic Analysis. Springer, Berlin; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Park CG: Linear *-derivations on C *-algebras. Tamsui Oxf J Math Sci 2007, 23(2):155–171.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nambu Y: Generalized Hamiltonian mechanics. Phys Rev 1973, D7: 2405–2412.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Okubo S: Triple products and Yang-Baxter equation (I): octonional and quaternionic triple systems. J Math, Phys 1993, 34(7):3273–3291. 10.1063/1.530076

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Park C: Homomorphisms between Lie JC *-algebras and Cauchy-Rassias stability of Lie JC *-algebra derivations. J Lie Theory 2005, 15: 393–414.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Park C, Eshaghi Gordji M: Comment on "Approximate ternary Jordan derivations on Banach ternary algebras" [Bavand Savadkouhi et al. J. Math. Phys. 50, 042303 (2009). J Math Phys 2010, 51(044102):7.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Rassias JM: Solution of the Ulam stability problem for quartic mappings. Glasnik Matematicki 1999, 34: 243–252.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rassias JM: On a new approximation of approximately linear mappings by linear mappings. Discus Math 1985, 7: 193–196.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rassias JM: On approximation of approximately linear mappings by linear mappings. J Funct Anal 1982, 46(1):126–130. 10.1016/0022-1236(82)90048-9

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rassias ThM: Problem 16; 2, Report of the 27th International Symp.on Functional Equations. Aequationes Math 1990, 39: 292–293.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rassias, ThM (Eds): Functional Equations, Inequalities and Applications Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2003.

  52. 52.

    Cayley A: On the 34 concomitants of the ternary cubic. Am J Math 1881, 4(1–4):1–15.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Abramov V, Kerner R, Le Roy B: Hypersymmetry a Z3graded generalization of supersymmetry. J Math Phys 1997, 38: 1650–1669. 10.1063/1.531821

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bazunova N, Borowiec A, Kerner R: Universal differential calculus on ternary algebras. Lett Matt Phys 2004, 67(3):195–206.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bagarello F, Morchio G: Dynamics of mean-field spin models from basic results in abstract differential equations. J Stat Phys 1992, 66: 849–866. 10.1007/BF01055705

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sewell GL: Quantum Mechanics and its Emergent Macrophysics. Princeton Universtiy Press, Princeton, NJ; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Takhtajan L: On foundation of the generalized Nambu mechanics. Commun Math Phys 1994, 160(2):295–315. 10.1007/BF02103278

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Vainerman L, Kerner R: On special classes of n-algebras. J Math Phys 1996, 37(5):2553–2565. 10.1063/1.531526

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zettl H: A characterization of ternary rings of operators. Adv Math 1983, 48: 117–143. 10.1016/0001-8708(83)90083-X

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bavand Savadkouhi M, Gordji ME, Rassias JM, Ghobadipour N: Approximate ternary Jordan derivations on Banach ternary algebras. J Math Phys 2009, 50(042303):9.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ebadian A, Ghobadipour N, Eshaghi Gordji M: On the stability of a parametric-additive functional equations in quasi-Banach spaces. Abst Appl Anal 2012, 2012: 13. Art id 235359

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madjid Eshaghi Gordji.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osbouei, M., Gordji, M.E., Ebadian, A. et al. Stability and superstability of ternary homomorphisms and ternary derivations on ternary quasi-Banach algebras. Adv Differ Equ 2012, 80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-80

Download citation

Keywords

  • superstability
  • Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability
  • Isac-Rassias-type stability
  • ternary algebra
  • homomorphism
  • derivation
  • quasi-Banach space
\