# Infinitely many periodic solutions for discrete second order Hamiltonian systems with oscillating potential

- Chengfu Che
^{1}and - Xiaoping Xue
^{1}Email author

**2012**:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-50

© Che and Xue; licensee Springer. 2012

**Received: **4 September 2011

**Accepted: **19 April 2012

**Published: **19 April 2012

## Abstract

In this article we obtain two sequence of infinitely many periodic solutions for discrete second order Hamiltonian systems with an oscillating potential. One sequence of solutions are local minimizers of the functional corresponding to the system, the other sequence are minimax type critical points of the functional.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction

Discrete problems arise in the study of combinatorial analysis, quantum physics, chemical reactions, population dynamics, and so forth. Besides, they are also natural consequences of the discretization of continuous problems. On the other hand, the critical point theory has been a powerful tool in dealing with the existence and multiplicity results. Thus, discrete problems have been studied by many scholars via critical point theory. For example, Pankov and Zakharchenko used a variational method known as Nehari manifolds and a discrete version of the Lions concentration-compactness principle in [1] to establish existence results of nontrivial standing wave solutions for discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Lately in [2], Pankov and Rothos employed Nehari manifolds approach and the Mountain Pass argument to demonstrate the existence of solutions in the discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation with saturable nonlinearity. While for discrete Hamiltonian systems, Yu and Guo established a variational structure and introduced variational technique to the study of periodic solutions in [3–5].

*u*(

*t*) :=

*u*(

*t*+ 1) -

*u*(

*t*), Δ

^{2}

*u*(

*t*) = Δ(Δ

*u*(

*t*)), and ∇

*F*(

*t, x*) denotes the gradient of

*F*with respect to the second variable. Systems (1) can be considered as a discrete analog of the following Hamiltonian systems:

where *ü*(*t*) denotes the second derivative of *u* with respect to *t*. Throughout of this article *F* will be called potential function, (·, ·) and | · | denote the inner product and norm in **R**^{
N
}respectively. A basic assumption we make on *F* is that *F* satisfies the following sublinear condition:

*F*

_{ α })

*F*(

*t, x*) ∈

*C*

^{1}(

**R**

^{ N },

**R**) for any

*t*∈

**Z**[0,

*T*] and

*F*is

*T*-periodic in the first variable. Moreover there exist

*f, g*:

**Z**[0,

*T*] →

**R**

^{+}and 0 <

*α*< 1 such that

*F*

_{ α }) and a partially coercive assumption:

But until now, no multiplicity results are obtained under subquadratic or sublinear condition.

On the other hand, the multiplicity problem was considered in [3, 7–9]. When one study the multiplicity problem, an effective method is index theory. The index measure the size of subset which is invariant under some group action, such as *Z*_{
p
}action (for explicit definition, see [10]). If the functional is also invariant under this group action, The multiplicity of critical points can be obtained form the multiplicity of index. Guo and Yu [7] used the above mentioned *Z*_{
p
}index theory to show that there are at least *T* - 1 distinct *Z*_{
T
}-orbits for (1) when the potential function is autonomous and superquadratic, and at least 2(*T* - 1) distinct *Z*_{
T
}-orbits when moreover the potential function is even. They also obtained a result about the lower bounds for the number of *T*-periodic solutions for the asymptotically linear potential case. Their approach was based on *Z*_{
p
}index theory introduced in [10], so the autonomous condition is essential. However, infinitely many kinds of results can not be obtained form this method, since the index of the whole space if finite. For superquadratic system (1) where the potential may depend on time, Guo et al. obtained at least two nontrivial solutions in [3, 9]. Later Xue and Tang obtained the same result under a more general superquadratic condition in [8].

*F*has a suitable oscillating behavior at infinity:

Then we obtain two sequence of infinitely many periodic solutions by minimax methods. One sequence of solutions is local minimizer of the functional *φ* corresponding to system (1), and the other are minimax type critical points of *φ*. The explicit form of *φ* will be given in Section 2. The idea in this article was inspired by Habets et al. [11] and Zhang and Tang [12], where Dirichlet type and periodic type boundary value problem for continuous systems were studied.

The following are main results:

**Theorem 1.1** *Assume that F satisfies* (*F*_{
α
}), (3) *and* (4). *Then*

(*a*) *there exists a sequence* {*u*_{
n
}} *of solutions of* (1) *such that* {*u*_{
n
}} *is a critical point of φ and* lim_{n→∞}*φ*(*u*_{
n
}) = +∞*;*

(*b*) *there exists a sequence* $\left\{{u}_{n}^{*}\right\}$*of solutions of* (1) *such that* $\left\{{u}_{n}^{*}\right\}$*is a local minimum of φ and* ${\mathsf{\text{lim}}}_{n\to \infty}\phi \left({u}_{n}^{*}\right)=-\infty $.

In the rest of this article, we first give some preliminaries in Section 2, then give the proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 3.

## 2 Preliminaries

**R, Z, N**be the sets of real numbers, integers and natural numbers, respectively. For

*a, b*∈

**Z**and

*c*∈

**R, Z**[

*a, b*] denotes the discrete interval {

*a, a*+ 1,...,

*b*} when

*a*<

*b*and [

*c*] denote the largest integer less than

*c*. In order to apply critical point theory, we then introduced the variational structure corresponding to system (1). For any given positive integer

*T*, the linear space

*H*

_{ T }is defined by

*H*

_{ T }can be equipped with inner product

*H*

_{ T }is a finite dimensional Hilbert space and is linear homeomorphic to

**R**

^{ NT }. Define another norm ∥ · ∥

_{∞}by

*H*

_{ T }is finite dimensional, this norm is equivalent with ∥ · ∥:

*H*

_{ T }

One can easily check that *u* ∈ *H*_{
T
}is a critical point of *φ* if and only if *u* is a solution of (1).

The following lemma give a new decomposition of *H*_{
T
}according to spectra of operator Δ^{2} with periodic boundary condition.

**Lemma 2.1**[[8], Lemma 1]

*As a subspace of H*

_{ T },

*N*

_{ k }

*is is defined by*

*where* ${\lambda}_{k}=2-2\mathsf{\text{cos}}k\omega ,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\omega =\frac{2\pi}{2},\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}k\in \mathbf{Z}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left[0,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left[\frac{T}{2}\right]\right]$. *Then we have:*

(*a*) *N*_{
k
}⊥*N*_{
j
}*for any k* ≠ *j and* $j,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}k\in \mathbf{Z}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left[0,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left[\frac{T}{2}\right]\right]$.

(*b*) ${H}_{T}={\oplus}_{k=0}^{\left[\frac{T}{2}\right]}$.

*V*=

*N*

_{0}and $W={\oplus}_{k=1}^{\left[\frac{T}{2}\right]}{N}_{k}$. Then it is easy to see

*H*

_{ T }=

*V*⊕

*W*and

The element *u* of *V* is just the eigenvector corresponding to *λ*_{0} = 0 which satisfy *u*(*t*) = *u*(0) for *t* ∈ **Z** [0, *T*].

Now we introduce a minimax theorem which include many well know results. This theorem not only asserts the existence of a Palais Smale sequence, but also gives the location information of the Palais Smale sequence. This will play an important role in our proof of Theorem 1.1.

**Proposition 2.1**[[13], Corollary 4.3]

*Let K be a compact metric space, K*

_{0}⊂

*K a closed set, X a Banach space, χ*∈

*C*(

*K*

_{0},

*X*)

*and let us define the complete metric space M by*

*with the usual distance d. Let φ*∈

*C*

^{ 1 }(

*X*,

**R**)

*and let us define*

*If c*>

*c*

_{1},

*then for each sequence*{

*f*

_{ k }} ⊂

*M such that*max

_{ K }

*φ*(

*f*

_{ k }) →

*c, there exists a sequence*{

*v*

_{ k }} ⊂

*X such that*

*as k* → ∞.

## 3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

In this section we give the proof of Theorem 1.1. Before that, we need to establish some basic lemmas.

**Lemma 3.1** *Suppose* (*F*_{
α
}) *holds, then φ is coercive in the subspace W, that is φ*(*u*) *→* ∞ *as* ∥*u*∥ → ∞ *in W*.

**Proof**: For any

*u*∈

*W*, it follows from (

*F*

_{ α }) that

Since *α* < 1, we have *φ*(*u*) → ∞ as ∥*u*∥ → ∞ in *W*.

**Lemma 3.2**

*Suppose*(3)

*holds. Then there exists a positive sequence*{

*a*

_{ n }}

*such that*

**Proof**. For

*u*∈

*V*, we have

*u*(0) =

*u*(1) = ⋯ =

*u*(

*T*), ∥

*u*∥

^{2}=

*T*|

*u*(0)|

^{2}and

*d*

_{ n }} such that

as *n* → ∞.

**Lemma 3.3**

*Suppose*(

*F*

_{ α })

*and*(4)

*hold. Then there exists a positive sequence*{

*b*

_{ m }}

*such that*

*where* ${H}_{{b}_{m}}=\left\{u\in V|\u2225u\u2225={b}_{m}\right\}\oplus W$.

**Proof**. For any $u\in {H}_{{b}_{m}}$, let $u=\mathit{\u016b}+\mathit{\u0169}$ with $\mathit{\u016b}\in V$ and $\mathit{\u0169}\in W$. It follows form (

*F*

_{ α }) that

*φ*(

*u*), we have

*F*

_{-}) there exists sequence

*e*

_{ m }→ ∞ such that

After the above preparations we give the proof of our main result.

**Proof of Theorem 1.1**Denote the ball in

*V*with radius

*a*

_{ n }by ${B}_{{a}_{n}}$. Then we define a family of maps

*n*. By Lemma 3.1, the functional

*φ*is coercive on

*W*, then there exists a constant

*M*such that inf

_{u∈W}

*φ*(

*u*) ≥

*M*. On the other hand, it is well know that ${B}_{{a}_{n}}$ and

*W*are linked (see [[14], Theorem 4.6]), i.e., for any $\gamma \in {\Gamma}_{n},\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\gamma \left({B}_{{a}_{n}}\right)\cap W\ne \mathrm{0\u0338}$. It follows that ${\mathsf{\text{max}}}_{u\in {B}_{{a}_{n}}}\phi \left(\gamma \left(u\right)\right)\ge {\mathsf{\text{inf}}}_{u\in W}\phi \left(u\right)$ for any

*γ*∈ Γ

_{ n }. Hence we have

*c*

_{ n }≥ inf

_{u∈W}

*φ*(

*u*) ≥

*M*. In view of Lemma 3.2,

holds for large values of *n*, where $\partial {B}_{{a}_{n}}$ denote the boundary of ${B}_{{a}_{n}}$ in *V* : {*u* ∈ *V*|∥*u*∥ = *a*_{
n
}}.

*n*, there exists a sequence {

*γ*

_{ k }} ⊂ Γ

_{ n }such that

*v*

_{ k }} ⊂

*H*such that

as *k* → ∞. If we can show {*v*_{
k
}} is bounded, then from the fact that *H* is finite dimensional we know there is a subsequence, which is still be denoted by {*v*_{
k
}} such that *v*_{
k
}converge to some point *u*_{
n
}. By the continuity of *φ* and *φ'*, we know *φ*(*u*_{
n
}) = *c*_{
n
}and *φ'*(*u*_{
n
}) = 0. That is, *u*_{
n
}is a critical point of *φ*.

*v*

_{ k }} is bounded. For large enough

*k*, by (5), we have

*v*

_{ k }-

*w*

_{ k }∥ ≤ 1. By Lemma 3.3, we can find a large enough

*m*such that

*b*

_{ m }>

*a*

_{ n }and $\underset{u\in {H}_{{b}_{m}}}{\mathsf{\text{inf}}}\phi \left(u\right)>{c}_{n}+1$. This implies that ${\gamma}_{k}\left({B}_{{a}_{n}}\right)$ can not intersect the hyperplane ${H}_{{b}_{m}}$ for each

*k*. Let ${w}_{k}={\stackrel{\u0304}{w}}_{k}+{\stackrel{\u0303}{w}}_{k}$ with ${\stackrel{\u0304}{w}}_{k}\in V$ and ${\stackrel{\u0303}{w}}_{k}\in W$. Then $\u2225{\stackrel{\u0304}{w}}_{k}\u2225<{b}_{m}$ for each

*k*. Besides, by (

*F*

_{ α }), it is obvious that

*w*

_{ k }is bounded. Hence {

*v*

_{ k }} is bounded. From previous discussion we know that the accumulation point

*u*

_{ n }of {

*v*

_{ k }} is a critical point and

*c*

_{ n }is critical value of

*φ*. In order to prove part (a), we still have to show

*n*such that

*a*

_{ n }>

*b*

_{ m }, then $\gamma \left({B}_{{a}_{n}}\right)$ intersect the hyperplane ${H}_{{b}_{m}}$ for any

*γ*∈ Γ

_{ n }. It follows that

This inequality and Lemma 3.3 implies (7).

*b*) of Theorem 1.1. For fixed

*m*∈

**N**, define the subset

*P*

_{ m }of

*H*by

*φ*is bounded form below on

*P*

_{ m }. Let us set

*u*

_{ k }} in

*P*

_{ m }, that is,

*u*

_{ k }} is bounded in

*H*. Then there exists a subsequence, which is still be denoted by {

*u*

_{ k }} such that ${u}_{k}\to {u}_{m}^{*}$ as

*k*→ ∞. Form the fact that

*P*

_{ m }is a closed subset of

*H*and that

*φ*is continuous we know ${u}_{m}^{*}\in {P}_{m}$ and

*P*

_{ m }, then ${u}_{m}^{*}$ is a critical point of

*φ*. Let ${u}_{m}^{*}={\mathit{\u016b}}_{m}^{*}+{\mathit{\u0169}}_{m}^{*}$ with ${\mathit{\u016b}}_{m}^{*}\in V$ and ${\mathit{\u0169}}_{m}^{*}\in W$. If

*a*

_{ n }<

*b*

_{ m }, then $\partial {B}_{{a}_{n}}\subset {P}_{m}$. This implies that

It follows from Lemma 3.2 that $\phi \left({u}_{m}^{*}\right)\to -\infty $ as *m* → ∞. By Lemma 3.3 we have ${\mathit{\u016b}}_{m}^{*}\ne {b}_{m}$ for large values of *m*, which means that ${u}_{m}^{*}$ is in the interior of *P*_{
m
}, and ${u}_{m}^{*}$ is a critical point of *φ* with $\phi \left({u}_{m}^{*}\right)\to -\infty $ as *m* → ∞. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is finished.

**Example 1**

*Now we give an example of potential function which satisfies condition*(

*F*

_{ α }), (3)

*and*(4).

*For simplicity, we drop the dependence in t:*

*Note that F is continuously differentiable and its gradient reads as*

*Then it is easy to see F satisfies condition* (*F*_{
α
}), (3) *and* (4). *A routine application of Theorem* 1.1 *shows that system* (1) *with potential function F has infinitely many periodic solutions*.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thanks the editors and the referee for their many valuable comments which helped improving the article. This research was partly supported by the NNSF of China (Grant No. 10971043), by the Heilongjiang Province Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. JC200810), and by the Program of Excellent Team at Harbin Institute of Technology.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Pankov A, Zakharchenko N: On some discrete variational problems.
*Acta Appl Math*2000, 65: 295–303.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pankov A, Rothos V: Solitons in discrete nonlinear Schrodinger equation with saturable non-linearity.
*Proc R Soc Lond Ser A*2008, 464: 3219–3236.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Guo Z, Yu J: Existence of periodic and subharmonic solutions for second-order superlinear difference equations.
*Sci China Ser A*2003, 46(4):506–515.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Guo Z, Yu J: Periodic and subharmonic solutions for superquadratic discrete Hamiltonian systems.
*Nonlinear Anal*2003, 55(7–8):969–983.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Guo Z, Yu J: The existence of periodic and subharmonic solutions of subquadratic second-order difference equations.
*J Lond Math Soc*2003, 68(2):419–430.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xue YF, Tang CL: Existence of a periodic solution for subquadratic second-order discrete Hamiltonian system.
*Nonlinear Anal*2007, 6(7):2072–2080.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Guo Z, Yu J: Multiplicity results for periodic solutions to second-order difference equations.
*J Dyn Diff Equ*2006, 18(4):943–960.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xue YF, Tang CL: Multiple periodic solutions for superquadratic second-order discrete Hamiltonian systems.
*Appl Math Comput*2008, 196: 494–500.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhou Z, Guo Z, Yu J: Periodic solutions of higher-dimensional discrete systems.
*Proc R Soc Edinburgh*2004, 134A: 1013–1022.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Liu J: A geometrical index for the group
*Z*_{ p }.*Acta Math Sinica, New Ser*1989, 5(3):193–196.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Habets P, Manásevich R, Zanolin F: A nonlinear boundary value problem with potential oscillating aroud the first eigenvalue.
*J Diff Equ*1995, 117: 428–445.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhang P, Tang CL: Infinitely many periodic solutions for nonautonomous sublinear second order Hamiltonian systems.
*Abstr Appl Anal*2010, 2010: 1–10.Google Scholar - Mawhin J, Willem M:
*Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian System.*Springer-Verlag, New York; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rabinowitz P: Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Application to differential Equations.
*AMS, Providence*1986.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.