# Existence of positive solutions to discrete second-order boundary value problems with indefinite weight

- Chenghua Gao
^{1}Email author, - Guowei Dai
^{1}and - Ruyun Ma
^{1}

**2012**:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-3

© Gao et al; licensee Springer. 2012

**Received: **14 August 2011

**Accepted: **17 January 2012

**Published: **17 January 2012

## Abstract

Let *T* > 1 be an integer, $T=\left\{1,2,...,T\right\}$. This article is concerned with the global structure of the set of positive solutions to the discrete second-order boundary value problems

where *r* ≠ 0 is a parameter, $m:T\to \mathbb{R}$ changes its sign, *m*(*t*) ≠ 0 for $t\in T$ and *f* : ℝ → ℝ is continuous. Also, we obtain the existence of two principal eigenvalues of the corresponding linear eigenvalue problems.

**MSC (2010)**: 39A12; 34B18.

### Keywords

discrete indefinite weighted problems positive solutions principal eigenvalue bifurcation existence## 1 Introduction

*T*> 1 be an integer, $T=\left\{1,2,...,T\right\}$. This article is concerned with the global structure of the set of positive solutions to the discrete second-order boundary value problem (BVP)

where *r* ≠ 0 is a parameter, *f* : ℝ → ℝ is continuous, *m*(*t*) ≠ 0 for $t\in T$ and $m:T\to \mathbb{R}$ changes its sign, i.e., there exists a proper subset ${T}_{+}$ of $T$, such that *m*(*t*) > 0 for $t\in {T}_{+}$ and *m*(*t*) < 0 for $t\in T\backslash {T}_{+}$.

BVPs with indefinite weight arise from a selection-migration model in population genetics, see Fleming [1]. That an allele *A*_{1} holds an advantage over a rival allele *A*_{2} at some points and holds an disadvantage over *A*_{2} at some other points can be presented by changing signs of *m*. The parameter *r* corresponds to the reciprocal of the diffusion. The existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of BVPs for second-order differential equations with indefinite weight has been studied by many authors, see, for example [2–5] and the references therein. In [2], using Crandall-Rabinowitz's Theorem and Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem, Delgado and Suárez obtained the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions under Dirichlet boundary value condition. In 2006, Afrouzi and Brown [3] also obtained the similar results by using the mountain pass theorem. When *f* is concave-convex type, similar results were also obtained by Ma and Han [4] and Ma et al. [5], and the main tool they used was the Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem.

*m*(

*t*) > 0 on $T$, fixed point theorems, the discrete Gelfand theorem and the bifurcation techniques have been used to discuss the existence of positive solutions to the discrete problems, see, for example [6–8, 12–14]. However, there are few results on the existence of positive solutions of (1.1) and (1.2) when

*m*(

*t*) changes its sign on $T$. Maybe the main reason is that the spectrum of the following linear eigenvalue problems

is not clear when *m* changes its sign on $T$.

It is another aim of our article to give some information of the spectrum of (1.3) and (1.4). In this article, we will show that (1.3) and (1.4) has two principal eigenvalues λ_{m,-}< 0 < λ_{m,+}, and the corresponding eigenfunctions which we denote by *ψ*_{m,-}and *ψ*_{m,+}don't change their signs on $T$. Based on this result, using Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem [15], we will discuss the global structure of the set of positive solutions of (1.1), (1.2), and obtain the existence of positive solutions of (1.1) and (1.2). Moreover, we can also obtain the existence of negative solutions of (1.1) and (1.2).

Now, we give the definition of a positive solution and a negative solution of (1.1) and (1.2).

**Definition 1.1**. *A positive solution of problem* (1.1) *and* (1.2) *refers to a pair* (*r, u*), *where r* ≠ 0, *u is a solution of* (1.1) *with u* > 0 *on* $T$ *and u satisfies* (1.2). *Meanwhile* m (*r, u*) *is called a negative solution of* (1.1) *and* (1.2)*, if* (*r*, -*u*) *is a positive solution of* (1.1) *and* (1.2).

The article is arranged as follows. In Section 2, we state the Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem. In Section 3, the existence of two principal eigenvalues of (1.3) and (1.4) will be discussed. In Section 4, we state the main result and provide the proof.

## 2 Preliminaries

For the readers' convenience, we state the Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem [15] here.

*E*be a real Banach space. Consider the equation

which possesses the line of solutions {(λ,0)|λ ∈ ℝ} henceforth referred to as the *trivial solutions*, where *T* : *E* → *E* is a bounded linear operator and *H*(λ, *u*) is continuous on ℝ × *E* with *H*(λ, *u*) = *o*⊠ *u*⊠ near *u* = 0 uniformly on bounded λ intervals. Moreover, we assume that *T* and *H* are compact on *E* and ℝ × *E*, respectively, i.e., are continuous and they map bounded sets into relatively compact sets.

we will say *μ* is a characteristic value of *T* if there exists *v* ∈ *E, v* ≠ 0, such that *v* = *μTv*, i.e., *μ*^{-1} is a nonzero eigenvalue of *T*. Let *r*(*T*) denote the set of real characteristic values of *T* and Γ denote the closure of the set of nontrivial solutions of (2.1).

**Theorem 2.1** *([15, Theorem 1.3]). If μ* ∈ *r*(*T*) *is of odd multiplicity, then* Γ *contains a maximum subcontinuum* $\mathcal{C}$ *such that* $\left(\mu ,0\right)\in \mathcal{C}$ *and either*

*(i) meets* ∞ *in* ℝ × *E*,

*or*

*(ii) meets* $\left(\stackrel{\u0303}{\mu},0\right)$ *where* $\mu \ne \stackrel{\u0303}{\mu}\in r\left(T\right)$.

From [15], there exist two connected subsets, ${\mathcal{C}}^{+}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}^{-}$, of $\mathcal{C}$ such that $\mathcal{C}={\mathcal{C}}^{+}\cup {\mathcal{C}}^{-}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}^{+}\cap {\mathcal{C}}^{-}=\left\{\left(\mu ,0\right)\right\}$. Furthermore, Rabinowitz also shows that

**Theorem 2.2** *([15, Theorem 1.40]). Each of* ${\mathcal{C}}^{+},{\mathcal{C}}^{-}$ *meets* (*μ*, 0) *and either*

*(i) meets* ∞ *in* ℝ × *E*,

*or*

*(ii) meets* $\left(\stackrel{\u0303}{\mu},0\right)$ *where* $\mu \ne \stackrel{\u0303}{\mu}\in r\left(T\right)$.

## 3 Existence of two principal eigenvalues to (1.3) and (1.4)

Recall that $T=\left\{1,2,...,T\right\}$. Let $\widehat{T}=\left\{0,1,...,T+1\right\}$. Let $X=\left\{u:\widehat{T}\to \mathbb{R}|u\left(0\right)=u\left(T+1\right)=0\right\}$. Then *X* is a Banach space under the norm ${\u2225u\u2225}_{X}=\underset{t\in \widehat{T}}{\text{max}}\left|u\left(t\right)\right|$. Let $Y=\left\{u|u:T\to \mathbb{R}\right\}$. Then *Y* is a Banach space under the norm ${\u2225u\u2225}_{Y}=\underset{t\in \mathsf{\text{T}}}{\text{max}}\left|u\left(t\right)\right|$.

*L*:

*X*→

*Y*by

In this section, we will discuss the existence of principal eigenvalues for the BVP (1.3) and (1.4). At first, we give the definition of principal eigenvalue of (1.3) and (1.4).

**Definition 3.1**. *An eigenvalue* λ *for* (1.3) *and* (1.4) *is called principal if there exists a nonnegative eigenfunction corresponding to λ, i.e., if there exists a nonnegative u* ∈ *X* \ {0} *such that* (λ, *u*) *is a solution of* (1.3) *and* (1.4).

The main idea we will use arises from [16, 17]. For the reader's convenience, we state them here. At first, it is necessary to provide the definition of simple eigenvalue.

**Definition 3.2**. *An eigenvalue* λ *of* (1.3) *and* (1.4) *is called simple if dim* ${\bigcup}_{n=1}^{\infty}ker{\left(I-\lambda {L}^{-1}\right)}^{n}=1$, *where kerA denotes the kernel of A.*

**Theorem 3.1**. (1.3) *and* (1.4) *has two simple principal eigenvalues.*

**Proof**. Consider, for fixed λ, the eigenvalue problems

*T*simple eigenvalues

and the corresponding eigenfunction *ψ*_{m, k}(λ, *t*) has exactly *k* - 1 simple generalized zeros.

Thus, λ is a principal eigenvalue of (1.3) and (1.4), if and only if *μ*_{m,1}(λ) = 0.

Clearly, *S*_{m,λ}is bounded below and *μ*_{m,1}(λ) = inf_{ϕ∈X}*S*_{m,λ}, see [18, Theorem 7.7].

For fixed $\varphi \in X,\lambda \to {\sum}_{t=0}^{T}|\Delta \varphi \left(t\right){|}^{2}-\lambda {\sum}_{t=1}^{T}m\left(t\right){\varphi}^{2}\left(t\right)$ is an affine function and so a concave function. As the infimum of any collection of concave functions is concave, it follows that λ → *μ*_{m,1}(λ) is a concave function. Also, by considering test functions *ϕ*_{1}, *ϕ*_{2} ∈ *X* such that ${\sum}_{t=1}^{T}m\left(t\right){\varphi}_{1}^{2}\left(t\right)<0$ and ${\sum}_{t=1}^{T}m\left(t\right){\varphi}_{2}^{2}\left(t\right)>0$, it is easy to see that *μ*_{m,1}(λ) → -∞ as λ → ±∞. Thus, λ → *μ*_{m,1}(λ) is an increasing function until it attains its maximum, and is a decreasing function thereafter.

Since *μ*_{m,1}(0) > 0, λ → *μ*_{m,1}(λ) must have exactly two zeros. Thus, (1.3) and (1.4) has exactly two principal eigenvalues, λ_{m,+}> 0 and λ_{m,-}< 0, and the corresponding eigenfunctions don't change sign on $\widehat{T}$.

Now, we give a property for the above two principal eigenvalues.

**Theorem 3.2**. *If* $m,{m}_{1}:T\to \mathbb{R}$ *change their signs, and m*(*t*) ≤ *m*_{1}(*t*) *for* $t\in T$, *then* ${\lambda}_{{m}_{1},-}\le {\lambda}_{m,-},{\lambda}_{{m}_{1},+}\le {\lambda}_{m,+}$.

**Proof**. It can be seen that for λ < 0, ${S}_{m,\lambda}\ge {S}_{{m}_{1},\lambda}$, which implies ${\mu}_{m,1}\left(\lambda \right)\ge {\mu}_{{m}_{1},1}\left(\lambda \right)$ and consequently, ${\lambda}_{m,+}\ge {\lambda}_{{m}_{1},+}$.

On the other hand, for λ < 0, ${S}_{m,\lambda}\le {S}_{{m}_{1},\lambda}$, which indicates ${\mu}_{m,1}\left(\lambda \right)\le {\mu}_{{m}_{1},1}\left(\lambda \right)$ and consequently, ${\lambda}_{m,-}\ge {\lambda}_{{m}_{1},-}$.

## 4 Main result

We make the following assumptions.

(H1) *f* : ℝ → ℝ is continuous and *sf*(*s*) > 0 for *s* ≠ 0.

(H2) ${f}_{0}={\text{lim}}_{\left|s\right|\to 0}\frac{f\left(s\right)}{s}\in \left(0,\infty \right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{f}_{\infty}={\text{lim}}_{\left|s\right|\to +\infty}\frac{f\left(s\right)}{s}\in \left(0,\infty \right)$.

**Theorem 4.1**.

*Suppose that (H1) and (H2) hold Assume that*

*or*

*Then* (1.1) *and* (1.2) *has two solutions u*^{+} *and u*^{-} *such that u*^{+} *is positive on* $T$ *and u*^{-} *is negative on* $T$.

Obviously, we can get the following lemma with ease.

**Lemma 4.1**. *Suppose that u* ∈ *X and* $u\not\equiv 0$ *on* $T$ *satisfies* (1.1) *(or* (1.3)*) and there exists* ${t}_{0}\in T$ *such that u*(*t*_{0}) = 0, *then u*(*t*_{0} - 1)*u*(*t*_{0} + 1) < 0.

**Proof of Theorem 4.1**. First, we deal with the case *r* > 0.

*ζ, ξ*∈

*C*(ℝ, ℝ) such that

as a bifurcation problem from the trivial solution *u* ≡ 0.

*T*:

*X*→

*X*is compact. Further we note that

*H*(λ,

*u*) = λ

*L*

^{-1}[

*m*(·)

*ζ*(

*u*(·))] =

*o*⊠

*u*⊠near λ = 0 uniformly on bounded λ intervals, since

Let $E=\mathbb{R}\times X$ under the product topology. Let ${S}^{+}:=\left\{u\in X|u\left(t\right)>0\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{for}}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}t\in T\right\}$. Set *S*^{-} = -*S*^{+}, *S* = *S*^{+} ∪ *S*^{-}. Then *S*^{+} and *S*^{-} are disjoint in *X*. Finally let Ψ^{±} = ℝ × *S*^{±} and Ψ = ℝ × *S*. Let Σ be the closure of the set of nontrivial solutions of (1.1) and (1.2).

It is easy to see that $\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}}\in r\left(T\right)$ is simple. Now applying Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we get the result as follows: Σ contains a maximum subcontinuum ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}$ which is composed of two distinct connected set ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{+}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}$ such that ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}={\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{+}\cup {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{+}\cap {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}=\left\{\left(\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}},0\right)\right\}$. Moreover, Lemma 4.1 guarantees the second case in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 cannot happen. Otherwise, there will exist $\left(\eta ,y\right)\in {C}_{+}^{v}$, such that *y* has a multiple zero point *t*_{0}, (i.e., *t*_{0} satisfies *y*(*t*_{0}) = 0 and *y*(*t*_{0} - 1)*y*(*t*_{0} + 1) > 0). However, this contradicts Lemma 4.1. Thus, for each $\nu \in \left\{+,-\right\},{\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{\nu}$ joins $\left(\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}},0\right)$ to infinity in Ψ^{
v
}and ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{\nu}\backslash \left\{\left(\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}},0\right)\right\}\subset {\Psi}^{\nu}$.

*u*) yields a solution

*u*to (1.1) and (1.2). We will show that ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{\nu}$ crosses the hyperplane {1} ×

*X*in ℝ ×

*X*. To achieve this goal, it will be enough to show that

where ${\mu}_{n}+\left|\right|{y}_{n}|{|}_{X}\to \infty .$ denotes the projection of ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{\nu}$ on ℝ.

We note that *μ*_{
n
}> 0 for all *n* ∈ **ℕ** since (0,0) is the only solution of (4.5) for λ = 0 and ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{\nu}\cap \left(\left\{0\right\}\times X\right)=\varnothing $.

*Case 1*. $\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{\infty}}<1<\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}}$.

We divide the proof into two steps.

*Step 1*. We show that if there exists a constant number

*M*> 0 such that

then (4.7) holds.

*y*

_{ n }⊠

_{ x }and set ${\u0233}_{n}=\frac{{y}_{n}}{\left|\right|{y}_{n}|{|}_{X}}$. Since ${\u0233}_{n}$ is bounded in

*X*and

*μ*

_{ n }is bounded in ℝ, after taking the subsequence if necessary, we have that ${\u0233}_{n}\to \u0233$ for some $\u0233\in X$ with $\left|\right|\u0233|{|}_{X}=1$ and ${\mu}_{n}\to \stackrel{\u0304}{\mu}$ for some

*μ*∈ ℝ. Moreover, from (4.4) and the fact that $\stackrel{\u0303}{\xi}$ is nondecreasing, we have that

We only prove that if ${y}_{n}\in {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{+}$, then ${\u0233}_{n}\in {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{+}$. The other case that if ${y}_{n}\in {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}$, then ${\u0233}_{n}\in {\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}$ can be treated similarly.

Thus, (4.7) holds.

*Step 2*. We show that there exists a constant *M* > 0 such that *μ*_{
n
}∈ (0, *M*] for all *n*.

*μ*

_{ n },

*y*

_{ n })} are the solutions to (4.5), they follow that

*ρ*

_{1}and

*ρ*

_{2}, such that

*η*

_{*}> 0 be the positive principal eigenvalue of the following linear eigenvalue problem

*η**> 0 the positive principal eigenvalue of the following linear eigenvalue problem

*Case 2*. $\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{0}}<1<\frac{{\lambda}_{m,+}}{r{f}_{\infty}}$.

*M*> 0 such that for all

*n*∈

**ℕ**,

which implies that (4.8) holds.

At last, we deal with the case *r* < 0.

as a bifurcation problem from the trivial solution *u* ≡ 0. Now, applying Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we get the following results: Σ contains a maximum subcontinuum ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}$ which is composed of two distinct connected set ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{+}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{-}$ such that ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}={\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{+}\cup {\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{-}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}_{+}^{-}\cap {\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{-}=\left\{\left({\scriptscriptstyle \frac{{\lambda}_{m,-}}{-r{f}_{0}}},0\right)\right\}$. Moreover, by Lemma 4.1, for each $\nu \in \left\{+,-\right\},{\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{\nu}$ joins $\left(\frac{{\lambda}_{m,-}}{-r{f}_{0}},0\right)$ to infinity in Ψ^{
v
}and ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{\nu}\backslash \left\{\left(\frac{{\lambda}_{m,-}}{-r{f}_{0}},0\right)\right\}\subset {\Psi}^{\nu}$, where Σ and Ψ^{
v
}are defined as in the case *r* > 0.

*u*) yields a solutions

*u*of (1.1) and (1.2). We will show ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{\nu}$ crosses the hyperplane {-1} ×

*X*in ℝ ×

*X*. To achieve this goal, it will be enough to show that

We note that *μ*_{
n
}< 0 for all *n* ∈ **ℕ** since (0, 0) is the only solution to (4.18) for λ = 0 and ${\mathcal{C}}_{-}^{\nu}\cap \left(\left\{0\right\}\times X\right)=\varnothing $.

The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of the case *r* > 0, so we omit it.

## 5 Example

*T*= 5, then $T=\left\{1,2,3,4,5\right\}$. Consider the following discrete second-order BVPs

has two principal eigenvalues λ_{m,-}= -0.5099 and λ_{m,+}= 0.2867. The corresponding eigenfunctions

*ψ*

_{ m,- }(

*t*) and

*ψ*

_{m,+}(

*t*) satisfy

*f*(

*s*) satisfies (H1) and (H2). Thus, for

(5.1) and (5.2) has a positive solution *u*^{+} and a negative solution *u*^{-}.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors were very grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11061030, 11101335,11126296) and the Fundamental Research Funds of the Gansu Universities.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Fleming WH: A selection-migration model in population genetics.
*J Math Biol*2(1975):219–233.Google Scholar - Delgado M, Suárez A: On the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for some indefinite nonlinear eigenvalue problem.
*Proc Amer Math Soc*2004, 132(6):1721–1728. 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07233-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Afrouzi GA, Brown KJ: Positive mountain pass solutions for a semilinear elliptic equation with a sign-changing weight function.
*Nonlinear Anal: TMA*2006, 64: 409–416. 10.1016/j.na.2005.06.018MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ma RY, Han XL: Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of a nonlinear eigenvalue problem with indefinite weight function.
*Appl Math Comput*2009, 215: 1077–1083. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.06.042MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ma RY, Xu J, Han XL: Global bifurcation of positive solutions of a second-order periodic boundary value problems with indefinite weight.
*Nonlinear Anal: TMA*2009, 71: 2119–2125. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.046View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Agarwal RP, Henderson J: Positive solutions and nonlinear eigenvalue problems for third order difference equations.
*Comput Math Appl*1998, 36(10–12):347–355. 10.1016/S0898-1221(98)80035-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Agarwal RP, O'Regan D: Boundary value problems for discrete equations.
*Appl Math Lett*1997, 10(4):83–89. 10.1016/S0893-9659(97)00064-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Atici FM, Guseinov GSh: On the existence of positive solutions for nonlinear differential equations with periodic boundary conditions.
*J Comput Appl Math*2001, 132(2):341–356. 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00438-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rachunkova I, Tisdell CC: Existence of non-spurious solutions to discrete Dirichlet problems with lower and upper solutions.
*Nonlinear Anal: TMA*2007, 67(4):1236–1245. 10.1016/j.na.2006.07.010MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rodriguez J: Nonlinear discrete Sturm-Liouville problems.
*J Math Anal Appl*2005, 308(1):380–391. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.01.032MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cheng SS, Yen HT: On a discrete nonlinear boundary value problem.
*Linear Algebra Appl*2000, 313(1–3):193–201. 10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00133-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhang G, Feng W: On the number of positive solutions of a nonlinear algebraic system.
*Linear Algebra Appl*2007, 422(2–3):404–421. 10.1016/j.laa.2006.10.026MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ma RY, Ma HL: Positive solutions for nonlinear discrete periodic boundary value problems.
*Comput Math Appl*2010, 59: 136–141. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.071MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ma RY, Xu YJ, Gao CH: A global description of the positive solutions of sublinear second-order discrete boundary value problems.
*Adv Diff Equ, Art ID 671625*2009., 15:Google Scholar - Rabinowitz PH: Some global results of nonlinear eigenvalue problems.
*J Funct Anal*1971, 7: 487–513. 10.1016/0022-1236(71)90030-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hess P, Kato T: On some linear and nonlinear eigenvalue problems with indefinite weight function.
*Comm Part Diff Equ*1980, 5: 999–1030. 10.1080/03605308008820162MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Afrouzi GA, Brown KJ: On principal eigenvlaues for boundary value problems with indefinite weight and Robin boundary conditions.
*Proc Amer Math Soc*1999, 127(1):125–130. 10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04561-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kelly W, Peterson A:
*Difference Equations. An Introduction with Applications.*Academic Press, New York; 1990.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.