- Research Article
- Open Access

# Initial functions defining dominant positive solutions of a linear differential equation with delay

- Josef Diblík
^{1}Email author and - Mária Kúdelčíková
^{1}

**2012**:213

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-213

© Diblík and Kúdelčíková; licensee Springer 2012

**Received:**16 October 2012**Accepted:**27 November 2012**Published:**12 December 2012

## Abstract

Linear differential equation

where $c(t)$ is a positive continuous function and delay *r* is a positive constant, is considered for $t\to \mathrm{\infty}$. It is proved that, under certain assumptions on the function $c(t)$ and delay *r*, a class of positive linear initial functions defines dominant positive solutions with positive limit for $t\to \mathrm{\infty}$.

**MSC:**34K15, 34K25.

## Keywords

- linear differential equation with delay
- initial function
- retract method
- dominant solution
- asymptotic behavior of solution

## 1 Introduction

with a positive continuous function $c(t)$ on the set $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$, ${t}_{0}\in \mathbb{R}$, $0<r=\mathrm{const}$ in the non-oscillatory case. The following results on the asymptotic behavior of solutions, needed in the following analysis, are taken from [1] (see [2] as well).

**Theorem 1** (Theorem 18 in [1])

*Let there exist a positive solution*$\tilde{y}$

*of*(1)

*on*$[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$.

*Then there are two positive solutions*${y}_{1}$

*and*${y}_{2}$

*of*(1)

*on*$[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$

*satisfying*

*Moreover*,

*every solution*

*y*

*of*(1)

*on*$[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$

*is represented by the formula*

*where* $t\in [{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$ *and a coefficient* $K\in \mathbb{R}$ *depends on* *y*.

In [2] it is shown that in representation (3) an arbitrary couple ${y}_{1}$ and ${y}_{2}$ of two positive solutions of (1) satisfying (2) can be used, *i.e.*, the following theorem holds.

**Theorem 2** *Assume that* ${y}_{1}$ *and* ${y}_{2}$ *are two positive solutions of* (1) *on* $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$ *satisfying* (2). *Then every solution* *y* *of* (1) *on* $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$ *is represented by formula* (3), *where* $t\in [{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$ *and a coefficient* $K\in \mathbb{R}$ *depends on* *y*.

This is the reason for introducing the following definition.

**Definition 1** [2]

Let ${y}_{1}$ and ${y}_{2}$ be fixed positive solutions of (1) on $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$ with property (2). Then $({y}_{1},{y}_{2})$ is called a *pair of dominant and subdominant* *solutions on* $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$.

We note that in the literature one can find numerous criteria of positivity of solutions not only to (1), but more complicated, as well as lots of properties of such solutions and explanation of their importance (see, *e.g.*, books [3–9], papers [1, 2, 10–20], and the references therein). They are formulated as implicit criteria (simultaneously both sufficient and necessary) or as explicit sufficient criteria. In the paper we employ the following explicit criterion (assumptions are slightly modified to restrict the criterion to the considered case).

**Theorem 3** [17]

*If*

*for* $t\in [{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty})$, *then* (1) *has a non*-*oscillatory solution on* $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$.

In this paper we prove that every positive linear initial function given on the initial interval $[{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0}]$ and satisfying certain restrictions, defines a positive solution $y=y(t)$ of (1) on $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$. Moreover, we show that this positive solution is a dominant solution and its limit $y(\mathrm{\infty})$ is positive.

The paper is organized as follows. The main result (Theorem 5 below) in Section 3 is proved by the sensitive and flexible retract method. It is shortly described in Section 2. Its applicability is performed via Theorem 4, where an important role is played by a system of initial functions (see Definition 3). Proper choice of such a system of initial functions together with the application of Theorem 4 form the mainstay of the proof of Theorem 5.

## 2 Preliminaries - Ważewski’s retract principle

If $\sigma \in \mathbb{R}$, $A\ge 0$, and $y\in C([\sigma -r,\sigma +A],{\mathbb{R}}^{n})$, then, for each $t\in [\sigma ,\sigma +A]$, we define ${y}_{t}\in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$ by ${y}_{t}(\theta )=y(t+\theta )$, $\theta \in [-r,0]$.

where is a continuous quasi-bounded map which satisfies a local Lipschitz condition with respect to the second argument and ${\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ is an open subset in .

The principle below was for the first time introduced by Ważewski [21] for ordinary differential equations and later extended to retarded functional differential equations by Rybakowski [22].

We recall that the functional *F* is quasi-bounded if *F* is bounded on every set of the form $[{t}_{1},{t}_{2}]\times {\mathrm{C}}_{r,L}^{n}\subset {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$, where ${t}_{1}<{t}_{2}$, ${\mathrm{C}}_{r,L}^{n}:=C([-r,0],L)$ and *L* is a closed bounded subset of ${\mathbb{R}}^{n}$ (see [[5], p.305]).

In accordance with [23], a function $y(t)$ is said to be a *solution of the system* (4) *on* $[\sigma -r,\sigma +A)$ if there are
and $A>0$ such that
, $(t,{y}_{t})\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ and $y(t)$ satisfies the system (4) for $t\in [\sigma ,\sigma +A)$. For given
, $\phi \in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$, we say $y(\sigma ,\phi )$ is a solution of the system (4) through $(\sigma ,\phi )\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ if there is an $A>0$ such that $y(\sigma ,\phi )$ is a solution of the system (4) on $[\sigma -r,\sigma +A)$ and ${y}_{\sigma}(\sigma ,\phi )=\phi $. In view of the above conditions, each element $(\sigma ,\phi )\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ determines a unique solution $y(\sigma ,\phi )$ of the system (4) through $(\sigma ,\phi )\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ on its maximal interval of existence ${I}_{\sigma ,\phi}=[\sigma ,a)$, $\sigma <a\le \mathrm{\infty}$ which depends continuously on initial data [23]. A solution $y(\sigma ,\phi )$ of the system (4) is said to be *positive* if ${y}_{i}(\sigma ,\phi )>0$ on $[\sigma -r,\sigma ]\cup {I}_{\sigma ,\phi}$ for each $i=1,2,\dots ,n$.

As usual, if a set
, then int*ω* and *∂ω* denote the interior and the boundary of *ω*, respectively.

**Definition 2** [22]

is called a *regular polyfacial set* with respect to the system (4), provided it is nonempty and the conditions (*α*) to (*γ*) below hold:

(*α*) For
such that $(t+\theta ,\pi (\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$ for $\theta \in [-r,0)$, we have $(t,\pi )\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$.

*β*) For all $i=1,2,\dots ,p$, all $(t,y)\in \partial {\omega}^{\ast}$ for which ${l}_{i}(t,y)=0$, and all $\pi \in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$ for which $\pi (0)=y$ and $(t+\theta ,\pi (\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$, $\theta \in [-r,0)$, it follows that $D{l}_{i}(t,y)>0$, where

*γ*) For all $j=1,2,\dots ,q$, all $(t,y)\in \partial {\omega}^{\ast}$ for which ${m}_{j}(t,y)=0$, and all $\pi \in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$ for which $\pi (0)=y$ and $(t+\theta ,\pi (\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$, $\theta \in [-r,0)$, it follows that $D{m}_{j}(t,y)<0$, where

The elements in the sequel are assumed to be such that $(t,\pi )\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$.

**Definition 3**A

*system of initial functions*${p}_{A,{\omega}^{\ast}}$ with respect to the nonempty sets

*A*and ${\omega}^{\ast}$, where , is defined as a continuous mapping $p:A\to {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$ such that (i) and (ii) below hold:

- (i)
If $z=(t,y)\in A\cap int{\omega}^{\ast}$, then $(t+\theta ,p(z)(\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$ for $\theta \in [-r,0]$.

- (ii)
If $z=(t,y)\in A\cap \partial {\omega}^{\ast}$, then $(t+\theta ,p(z)(\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$ for $\theta \in [-r,0)$ and $(t,p(z)(0))=z$.

**Definition 4** [24]

If $\mathcal{A}\subset \mathcal{B}$ are subsets of a topological space and $\pi :\mathcal{B}\to \mathcal{A}$ is a continuous mapping from ℬ onto $\mathcal{A}$ such that $\pi (p)=p$ for every $p\in \mathcal{A}$, then *π* is said to be a *retraction* of ℬ onto $\mathcal{A}$. When a retraction of ℬ onto $\mathcal{A}$ exists, $\mathcal{A}$ is called a *retract* of ℬ.

The following lemma describes the main result of the paper [22].

**Lemma 1**

*Let*${\omega}^{\ast}\subset {\omega}_{0}$

*be a regular polyfacial set with respect to the system*(4),

*and let*

*W*

*be defined as follows*:

*Let*$Z\subset W\cup {\omega}^{\ast}$

*be a given set such that*$Z\cap W$

*is a retract of*

*W*

*but not a retract of*

*Z*.

*Then*,

*for each fixed system of initial functions*${p}_{Z,{\omega}^{\ast}}$,

*there is a point*${z}_{0}=({\sigma}_{0},{y}_{0})\in Z\cap {\omega}^{\ast}$

*such that for the corresponding solution*$y({\sigma}_{0},p({z}_{0}))(t)$

*of*(4)

*we have*

*for each* $t\in {D}_{{\sigma}_{0},p({z}_{0})}$.

**Remark 1** When Lemma 1 is applied, a lot of technical details should be fulfilled. In order to simplify necessary verifications, it is useful, without loss of generality, to vary the first coordinate *t* in the definition of the set ${\omega}^{\ast}$ in (5) within a half-open interval open at the right. Then the set ${\omega}^{\ast}$ is not open, but tracing the proof of Lemma 1, it is easy to see that for such sets it remains valid. Such possibility is used below. Similar remark and explanation can be applied to sets of the type Ω, ${\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\ast}$ which serve as domains of definitions of functionals on the right-hand sides of equations considered.

*ρ*,

*δ*are continuous vector functions

In the sequel we employ the result from [[11], Theorem 1].

**Theorem 4**

*Let there be a*$p\in \{0,\dots ,n\}$

*such that*:

- (i)
*If*$t\ge {t}_{0}$, $\varphi \in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$*and*$(t+\theta ,\varphi (\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$*for any*$\theta \in [-r,0)$,*then*${\left({\delta}^{i}\right)}^{\prime}(t)<{F}^{i}(t,\varphi )\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{when}{\varphi}^{i}(0)={\delta}^{i}(t),$(6)

*for any*$i=1,2,\dots ,p$. (

*If*$p=0$,

*this condition is omitted*.)

- (ii)
*If*$t\ge {t}_{0}$, $\varphi \in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{n}$*and*$(t+\theta ,\varphi (\theta ))\in {\omega}^{\ast}$*for any*$\theta \in [-r,0)$,*then*$\begin{array}{c}{\left({\rho}^{i}\right)}^{\prime}(t)<{F}^{i}(t,\varphi )\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{when}}{\varphi}^{i}(0)={\rho}^{i}(t),\hfill \\ {\left({\delta}^{i}\right)}^{\prime}(t){F}^{i}(t,\varphi )\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{when}}{\varphi}^{i}(0)={\delta}^{i}(t)\hfill \end{array}$

*for any* $i=p+1,p+2,\dots ,n$. (*If* $p=n$, *this condition is omitted*.)

*Then*,

*for each fixed system of initial functions*${p}_{Z,{\omega}^{\ast}}$,

*where the set*

*Z*

*is defined as*

*there is a point*${z}_{0}=({\sigma}_{0},{y}_{0})\in Z\cap {\omega}^{\ast}$

*such that for the corresponding solution*$y({\sigma}_{0},p({z}_{0}))(t)$

*of*(4)

*we have*

*for each*$t\in {D}_{{\sigma}_{0},p({z}_{0})}$,

*i*.

*e*.,

*then there exists an uncountable set*$\mathcal{Y}$

*of solutions of*(4)

*on*$[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$

*such that each*$y\in \mathcal{Y}$

*satisfies*

The original Theorem 1 is in [11] proved using the retract technique combined with Razumikhin-type ideas known in the theory of stability of retarded functional differential equations.

## 3 Main result

The first condition (8), in accordance with Theorem 3, guarantees the existence of a positive solution $y=y(t)$ on the interval $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$. Then Theorems 1 and 2 are valid and equation (1) has two different positive solutions (dominant and subdominant) $y={y}_{1}(t)$ and $y={y}_{2}(t)$ on the interval $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$. Condition (9), as will be seen from the explanation below, implies that the dominant solution has a positive limit for $t\to \mathrm{\infty}$.

*C*is well defined due to (9), and

Due to positivity of $c(t)$ on $[{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0}]$, we have $m>0$.

where ${K}^{\ast}({\phi}_{K,\mu})$ is a positive constant depending on the choice of the initial linear function ${\phi}_{K,\mu}$.

**Theorem 5**

*Let inequalities*(8), (9)

*be valid*,

*a constant*$C\ge 3/4$

*and*${\phi}_{K,\mu}\in {\mathrm{C}}_{r}^{1}$

*be defined by*(10).

*Then the solution*$y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})(t)$,

*where*${\phi}_{K,\mu}$

*is defined by*(10), $K,\mu \in \mathbb{R}$

*and*$|\mu |\le m$,

*is positive including the value*$y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})(\mathrm{\infty})$,

*i*.

*e*.

*and*

*Proof*We will employ Theorem 4 with $p=n=1$,

*i.e.*, the case (i) only. Set

*i.e.*, $C>\phi ({t}_{0}-r)$): ${\phi}_{2}(t)>{\phi}_{1}(t)>0$ on $[{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$. Now, we define

*i.e.*, for

*i.e.*, for

*i.e.*, every initial function is a linear function described by formula (10). Since ${\phi}^{\prime}(t)<0$, $t\in [{t}_{0}-r,\mathrm{\infty})$, for the system of functions ${p}_{Z,{\omega}^{\ast}}$, both assumptions (i), (ii) in Definition 3 are valid. Indeed, this property implies

if ${y}^{\ast}\in intZ$, $t\in [{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0}]$. Consequently, (i) in Definition 3 holds.

If ${y}^{\ast}\in \partial Z$, then inequalities (12) hold if $t\in [{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0})$ and (ii) is also valid.

*i.e.*,

*i.e.*,

due to positivity of ${\phi}_{1}(t)$.

Since the statement of the theorem holds for initial functions with $\mu =0$, we can also conclude that due to linearity of equation (1), every constant positive initial function defines a positive solution.

*i.e.*, if ${y}_{0}^{\ast}\ne K$, then due to linearity, the sum or the difference of $y({t}_{0},p({z}_{0}))(t)$ and a suitable positive solution generated by a positive constant initial function gives the solution $y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})(t)$. It is only necessary to show that the solution $y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})(t)$ will be again positive. The condition for positivity is

We finish the proof with the conclusion that the existence of positive limit ${K}^{\ast}({\phi}_{K,\mu})$ is proved. □

**Theorem 6** *Let all assumptions of Theorem * 5 *be valid*. *Then the solution* $y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})$ *of equation* (1) *is a positive dominant solution*.

*Proof*Every positive solution $y=y(t)$ of equation (1) on $[{t}_{0}-r,+\mathrm{\infty})$ is decreasing and therefore its limit ${lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}y(t)$ exists and is finite. The value of the limit can be either positive or zero. In the case of solution $y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})$ of equation (1), we have

which is obviously false. The possibility (15) remains. Then, by Definition 1, a solution $y({t}_{0},{\phi}_{K,\mu})$ of equation (1) is a dominant solution on $[{t}_{0}-r,+\mathrm{\infty})$. □

**Remark 2** It is well known [[8], Theorem 3.3.1] that every continuous initial function *φ*, defined on the interval $[{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0}]$, such that $\phi ({t}_{0})>0$, $\phi ({t}_{0})\ge \phi (s)$, $s\in [{t}_{0}-r,{t}_{0})$, defines a positive solution on $[{t}_{0}-r,+\mathrm{\infty})$ if the assumptions of Theorem 5 hold. But it is not known if such a solution is dominant or subdominant or if its limit for $t\to \mathrm{\infty}$ is positive or equals zero. The statements of Theorems 5 and 6 give new results in this direction since, for a class of linear initial positive functions (not fully covered by known results), positivity of generated solutions (including positivity of their limits) is established together with dominant character of their asymptotical behavior. It is a problem for future investigation to find values of positive limits of solutions considered in the paper (*e.g.*, by methods used in [25–27]) or to enlarge the presented method to more general classes of equations and initial functions.

The topic considered in this paper is also connected with problems on the existence of bounded solutions. We refer, *e.g.*, to recent papers [28–30] and to the references therein.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Grant No 1/0090/09 of the Grant Agency of Slovak Republic (VEGA).

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Diblík J: Behaviour of solutions of linear differential equations with delay.
*Arch. Math.*1998, 34(1):31–47.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Diblík J, Koksch N:Positive solutions of the equation $\dot{x}(t)=-c(t)x(t-\tau )$ in the critical case.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2000, 250: 635–659. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7008MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Agarwal RP, Berezansky L, Braverman E, Domoshnitsky A:
*Nonoscillation Theory of Functional Differential Equations and Applications*. Springer, Berlin; 2011.MATHGoogle Scholar - Agarwal RP, Bohner M, Li W-T:
*Nonoscillation and Oscillation: Theory for Functional Differential Equations*. Dekker, New York; 2004.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Driver RD:
*Ordinary and Delay Differential Equations*. Springer, Berlin; 1977.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Erbe LH, Kong Q, Zhang BG:
*Oscillation Theory for Functional Differential Equations*. Dekker, New York; 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar - Gopalsamy K:
*Stability and Oscillations in Delay Differential Equations of Population Dynamics*. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1992.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Györi I, Ladas G:
*Oscillation Theory of Delay Differential Equations*. Clarendon Press, Oxford; 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kolmanovskii V, Myshkis A Mathematics and Its Application (Soviet Series) 85. In
*Applied Theory of Functional Differential Equations*. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Čermák J: On a linear differential equation with a proportional delay.
*Math. Nachr.*2007, 280: 495–504. 10.1002/mana.200410498MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Diblík J: A criterion for existence of positive solutions of systems of retarded functional differential equations.
*Nonlinear Anal.*1999, 38: 327–339. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00199-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Diblík J, Kúdelčíková M:Two classes of asymptotically different positive solutions of the equation $\dot{y}(t)=-f(t,{y}_{t})$.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2009, 70: 3702–3714. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.026MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Diblík J, Kúdelčíková M: Two classes of positive solutions of first order functional differential equations of delayed type.
*Nonlinear Anal.*2012, 75: 4807–4820. 10.1016/j.na.2012.03.030MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Diblík J, Růžičková M: Asymptotic behavior of solutions and positive solutions of differential delayed equations.
*Funct. Differ. Equ.*2007, 14(1):83–105.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Dorociaková B, Kubjatková M, Olach R: Existence of positive solutions of neutral differential equations.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2012., 2012: Article ID 307968Google Scholar - Dorociaková B, Najmanová A, Olach R: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions of first-order neutral differential equations.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2011., 2011: Article ID 346745Google Scholar - Koplatadze RG, Chanturia TA: On the oscillatory and monotonic solutions of first order differential equation with deviating arguments.
*Differ. Uravn.*1982, 18: 1463–1465. (In Russian)Google Scholar - Kozakiewicz E: Über das asymptotische Verhalten der nichtschwingenden Lösungen einer linearen Differentialgleichung mit nacheilendem Argument.
*Wiss. Z. Humboldt Univ. Berlin, Math. Nat. R.*1964, 13(4):577–589.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kozakiewicz E: Zur Abschätzung des Abklingens der nichtschwingenden Lösungen einer linearen Differentialgleichung mit nacheilendem Argument.
*Wiss. Z. Humboldt Univ. Berlin, Math. Nat. R.*1966, 15(5):675–676.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Kozakiewicz E: Über die nichtschwingenden Lösungen einer linearen Differentialgleichung mit nacheilendem Argument.
*Math. Nachr.*1966, 32(1/2):107–113.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ważewski T: Sur un principe topologique de l’examen de l’allure asymptotique des intégrales des équations différentielles ordinaires.
*Ann. Soc. Pol. Math.*1947, 20: 279–313. (Krakow 1948)MATHGoogle Scholar - Rybakowski KP: Ważewski’s principle for retarded functional differential equations.
*J. Differ. Equ.*1980, 36: 117–138. 10.1016/0022-0396(80)90080-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Hale JK, Lunel SMV:
*Introduction to Functional Differential Equations*. Springer, Berlin; 1993.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Lakshmikantham V, Leela S:
*Differential and Integral Inequalities, Vol. I - Ordinary Differential Equations*. Academic Press, New York; 1969.MATHGoogle Scholar - Arino O, Pituk M: More on linear differential systems with small delays.
*J. Differ. Equ.*2001, 170: 381–407. 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3824MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Bereketoğlu H, Huseynov A: Convergence of solutions of nonhomogeneous linear difference systems with delays.
*Acta Appl. Math.*2010, 110(1):259–269. 10.1007/s10440-008-9404-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Györi I, Horváth L: Asymptotic constancy in linear difference equations: limit formulae and sharp conditions.
*Adv. Differ. Equ.*2010., 2010: Article ID 789302. doi:10.1155/2010/789302Google Scholar - Stević S: Existence of bounded solutions of some systems of nonlinear functional differential equations with complicated deviating argument.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2012, 218: 9974–9979. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.03.085MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Stević S: Bounded solutions of some systems of nonlinear functional differential equations with iterated deviating argument.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2012, 218: 10429–10434. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.03.103MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Stević S: Globally bounded solutions of a system of nonlinear functional differential equations with iterated deviating argument.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2012, 219: 2180–2185. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.063MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.