Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

Some identities on the higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α

Abstract

In this article, we introduce some properties of higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α, and we observe some properties of higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α for several cases. In particular, by using the the fermionic p-adic q-integral on p , we give a new concept of twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 11B68; 11S40; 11S80.

1. Introduction

Let p be a fixed odd prime. Throughout this article p , p , , and p , will, respectively, denote the ring of p- adic rational integers, the field of p-adic rational numbers, the complex number field, and the completion of algebraic closure of p . Let be the set of natural numbers and + = {0}. Let ν p be the normalized exponential valuation of p with p p = p - ν p ( p ) = p - 1 (see [114]). When one speaks of q-extension, q can be regarded as an indeterminate, a complex number q , or p-adic number q p ; it is always clear from context. If q , we assume |q| < 1. If q p , then we assume |1 - q| p < 1 (see [114]).

In this article, we use the notation of q-number as follows (see [114]):

[ x ] q = 1 - q x 1 - q .

Note that limq→1[x] q = x for any x with |x| p ≤ 1 in the p-adic case.

Let C( p ) be the space of continuous functions on p . For f C( p ), Kim defined the fermionic p-adic q-integral on p as follows (see [6, 7]):

I - q ( f ) = p f ( x ) d μ - q ( x ) = lim N 1 [ p N ] - q x = 0 p N - 1 f ( x ) ( - q ) x , = lim N [ 2 ] q 1 + q p N x = 0 p N - 1 f ( x ) ( - q ) x .
(1)

From (1), we note that

q I - q ( f 1 ) + I - q ( f ) = [ 2 ] q f ( 0 ) ,

where f1(x) = f(x + 1).

It is well known that the ordinary Euler polynomials are defined by

2 e t + 1 e x t = e E ( x ) t = n = 0 E n ( x ) t n n ! ,

with the usual convention of replacing En(x) by E n (x).

In the special case, x = 0, E n (0) = E n are called the n th Euler numbers (see [114]).

By (2), we get the following recurrence relation as follows:

E 0 = 1 , and ( E + 1 ) n + E = 2 , if n = 0 , 0 , if n > 0 .
(2)

Recently, (h, q)-Euler numbers are defined by

E 0 , q ( h ) = 2 1 + q h , and q h ( q E q ( h ) + 1 ) n + E q ( h ) = 2 , if n = 0 , 0 , if n > 0 ,

with the usual convention about replacing E q ( h ) n by E n , q ( h ) (see [116]).

Note that lim q 1 E n , q ( h ) = E n .

Let T p = N 1 C p N = lim N C p N , where C p N = { w | w p N = 1 } is the cyclic group of order pN. For w T p , we denote by ϕ w : p p the locally constant function x wx.

For α and w T p , the twisted q-Euler numbers with weight α are also defined by

0 , q , w ( α ) = [ 2 ] q w q + 1 , and w q q α q , w ( α ) + 1 n + n , q , w ( α ) = [ 2 ] q , if n = 0 , 0 , if n > 0 ,

with the usual convention about replacing q , w ( α ) n by n , q , w ( α ) (see [2, 5]).

The main purpose of this article is to present a systemic study of some families of higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α. In Section 2, we investigate higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α and establish interesting properties. In Sections 3, 4, and 5, we observe some properties for special cases.

2. Higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α

For h , α, k , w T p and n +, let us consider the expansion of higher-order-twisted q-Euler polynomials with weight α as follows:

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = p p w k - times i = 1 k x i i = 1 k x i + x q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) + + x k ( h - k ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) .
(3)

From (1) and (3), we note that

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = [ 2 ] q k ( 1 - q α ) n l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x ( 1 + w q α l + h ) ( 1 + w q α l + h - k + 1 ) .
(4)

In the special case, x = 0 n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | 0 ) = n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) are called the higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers with weight α.

By (3), we get

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) = ( q α - 1 ) n + 1 , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) .
(5)

From (5) and mathematical induction, we get the following theorem.

Theorem 1. For α, k and n +, we have

i = 0 n - 1 ( - 1 ) i - 1 ( q α - 1 ) n - 1 - i n - i , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) = ( q α - 1 ) n - 1 n , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) + ( - 1 ) n E 1 , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) .

For complex number q p , m +, we get the following;

q α ( x 1 + + x k + 1 ) m = 1 - ( 1 - q α ( x 1 + + x k + 1 ) ) m = l = 0 m m l ( - 1 ) l 1 - q α ( x 1 + + x k + 1 ) l = l = 0 m m l ( - 1 ) l ( 1 - q α ) l ( 1 - q α ( x 1 + + x k + 1 ) ) l ( 1 - q α ) l = l = 0 m m l ( - 1 ) l ( 1 - q α ) l [ x 1 + x 2 + + x k + 1 ] q α l .

From (3), (4), and above property, we have

0 , q , w ( α ) ( m α , k + 1 ) = p p w j = 1 k + 1 x j q j = 1 k + 1 ( m α - j ) x j d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k + 1 ) = l = 0 m m l ( q α - 1 ) l p p w j = 1 k + 1 x j j = 1 k + 1 x j q α l q - j = 1 k + 1 j x j d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k + 1 ) = l = 0 m m l ( q α - 1 ) l l , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k + 1 ) = [ 2 ] q k + 1 ( 1 + w q α m ) ( 1 + w q α m - 1 ) ( 1 + w q α m - k ) .
(6)

From (3), we can derive the following equation.

j = 0 i i j ( q α - 1 ) j p p w s = 1 k x s s = 1 k x s q α n - i + j q s = 1 k ( h - α - s ) x s d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = p p w s = 1 k x s s = 1 k x s q α n - i q s = 1 k ( h - s ) x s q α s = 1 k x s ( i - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = j = 0 i - 1 ( q α - 1 ) j i - 1 j n - i + j , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) .
(7)

By (3), (4), (5), and (6), we see that

j = 0 i ( q α - 1 ) j i j n - 1 + j , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) = j = 0 i - 1 ( q α - 1 ) j i - 1 j n - i + j , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) .

Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2. For α, k and n, i +, we have

j = 0 i i j ( q α - 1 ) j n - i + j , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k ) = j = 0 i - 1 ( q α - 1 ) j i - 1 j n - i + j , q , w ( α ) ( h , k ) .

By simple calculation, we easily see that

j = 0 m m j ( q α - 1 ) j j , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k ) = [ 2 ] q k ( 1 + w q α m ) ( 1 + w q α m - 1 ) ( 1 + w q α m - k + 1 ) .

3. Polynomials n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x )

We now consider the polynomials n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) (in qx) by

n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = p p k - times w x 1 + + x k x + i = 1 k x i q α n q - j = 1 k j x j d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) .
(8)

By (8) and (4), we get

( q α - 1 ) n n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = [ 2 ] q k l = 0 n n l q α l x ( - 1 ) n - 1 1 ( 1 + w q α l ) ( 1 + w q α l - k + 1 ) .
(9)

From (8) and (9), we can derive the following equation.

p p w x 1 + + x k q j = 1 k ( α n - j ) x j + α n x d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = j = 0 n n j [ α ] q j ( q - 1 ) j j , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) ,

and

p p w x 1 + + x k q j = 1 k ( α n - j ) x j + α n x d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = [ 2 ] q k q α n x ( 1 + w q α n ) ( 1 + w q α n - k + 1 ) .
(10)

Therefore, by (9) and (10), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 3. For α and n, k +, we have

n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = [ 2 ] q k [ α ] q n ( 1 - q ) n l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x 1 ( - w q α l - k + 1 : q ) k ,

and

l = 0 n n l [ α ] q l ( q - 1 ) l l , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = q α n x [ 2 ] q k ( - w q α n - k + 1 : q ) k ,

where (a : q)0 = 1 and (a : q) k = (1 - a)(1 - aq) (1 - aqk-1).

Let d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2). Then we have

p p w x 1 + + x k x + j = 1 k x j q α n q - j = 1 k j x j d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q k a 1 , , a k = 0 d - 1 w a 1 + + a k q - j = 2 k ( j - 1 ) a j ( - 1 ) j = 1 k a j × p p w d ( x 1 + + x k ) x + j = 1 k a j d + j = 1 k x j q α d n q - d j = 1 k j x j d μ - q d ( x 1 ) d μ - q d ( x k )
(11)

Thus, by (11), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 4. For d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2), we have

n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q k a 1 , , a k = 0 d - 1 ( - w ) a 1 + + a k q - j = 2 k ( j - 1 ) a j n , q d , w d ( α ) 0 , k | x + a 1 + + a k d .

Moreover,

n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | d x ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q k a 1 , , a k = 0 d - 1 ( - w ) a 1 + + a k q - j = 2 k ( j - 1 ) a j n , q d , w d ( α ) 0 , k | x + a 1 + + a k d .

By (8), we get

E ˜ n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x = l = 0 n ( n l ) [ x ] q α n l q α l x E ˜ l , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k ) = ( [ x ] q α + q α x E ˜ q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k ) ) n ,

where n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | 0 ) = n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k ) .

Thus, we note that

E ˜ n , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x + y ) = l = 0 n ( n l ) [ y ] q α n l q α l y E ˜ l , q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) = ( [ y ] q α + q α y E ˜ q , w ( α ) ( 0 , k | x ) ) n .

4. Polynomials n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x )

Let us define polynomials n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) as follows:

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) .
(12)

From (12), we have

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = [ 2 ] q ( 1 - q α ) n l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x 1 ( 1 + w q α l + h ) .

By the calculation of the fermionic p-adic q- integral on p , we see that

q α x p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) = ( q α - 1 ) p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n + 1 q x 1 ( h - α - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) + p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - α - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) .
(13)

Thus, by (13), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 5. For α and h , we have

q α x n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = ( q α - 1 ) n + 1 , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , 1 | x ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , 1 | x ) .

It is easy to show that

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) = l = 0 n n l [ x ] q α n - 1 q α l x p w x 1 [ x 1 ] q α l q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) = l = 0 n n l [ x ] q α n - 1 q α l x l , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) = q α x q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) + [ x ] q α n , for n 1 ,
(14)

with the usual convention about replacing ( q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) ) n by n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) .

From qI-q(f1) + I-q(f) = [2] q f(0), we have

w q h p w x 1 [ x + x 1 + 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) + p w x 1 [ x + x 1 ] q α n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) = [ 2 ] q [ x ] q α n .
(15)

By (13) and (15), we get

w q h n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x + 1 ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = [ 2 ] q [ x ] q α n .
(16)

For x = 0 in (16), we have

w q h n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | 1 ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) = [ 2 ] q , if n = 0 , 0 , if n > 0 .
(17)

Therefore, by (14) and (17), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 6. For h and n +, we have

w q h ( q α q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) + 1 ) n n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) = [ 2 ] q , if n = 0 , 0 , if n > 0 ,

with the usual convention about replacing ( q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) ) n by n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) .

From the fermionic p-adic q-integral on p , we easily get

0 , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) = p w x 1 q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q ( x 1 ) = [ 2 ] q [ 2 ] w q h .

By (12), we see that

n , q - 1 , w - 1 ( α ) ( h , 1 | 1 - x ) = p w - 1 [ 1 - x + x 1 ] q - α n q - x 1 ( h - 1 ) d μ - q - 1 ( x 1 ) = ( - 1 ) n w q α n + h - 1 [ 2 ] q ( 1 - q α ) n l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x 1 1 + w q α l + h = ( - 1 ) n w q α n + h - 1 n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x )
(18)

Therefore, by (18), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 7. For α , h and n +, we have

n , q - 1 , w - 1 ( α ) ( h , 1 | 1 - x ) = ( - 1 ) n w q α n + h - 1 n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) .

In particular, for x = 1, we get

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) = ( - 1 ) n w q α n + h - 1 n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | 1 ) = ( - 1 ) n + 1 q α n - 1 n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 ) if n 1 .

Let d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2). Then we have

p w x 1 q x 1 ( h - 1 ) [ x + x 1 ] q α n d μ - q ( x 1 ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q a = 0 d - 1 w a q h a ( - 1 ) a p w d x 1 x + a d + x 1 q α d n q x 1 ( h - 1 ) d d μ - q d ( x 1 ) .
(19)

Therefore, by (19), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 8 (Multiplication formula). For d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2), we have

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , 1 | x ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q a = 0 d - 1 w a q h a ( - 1 ) q n , q d , w d ( α ) h , 1 | x + a d .

5. Polynomials n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) and k= h

In (3), we know that

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = p p w x 1 + + x k [ x 1 + + x k + x ] q α n q ( h - 1 ) x 1 + + ( h - k ) x k d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) .

Thus, we get

( q α - 1 ) n n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = [ 2 ] q k l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) n - l q α l x ( 1 + w q α l + h ) ( 1 + w q α l + h - k + 1 ) ,

and

w q h p p w x 1 + + x k [ x + 1 + i = 1 k x i ] q α n q i = 1 k ( h - i ) x i d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = - p p w x 1 + + x k [ x + i = 1 k x i ] q α n q i = 1 k ( h - i ) x i d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) + [ 2 ] q p p w x 2 + + x k [ x + i = 2 k x i ] q α n q i = 2 k ( h - i ) x i d μ - q ( x 2 ) d μ - q ( x k ) .
(20)

Therefore, by (3) and (20), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 9. For h , α and n +, we have

w q h n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x + 1 ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = [ 2 ] q n , q , w ( α ) ( h - 1 , k - 1 | x ) .

Note that

q α x p p w x 1 + + w k [ x + i = 1 k x i ] q α n q i = 1 k ( h i ) x i d μ q ( x 1 ) d μ q ( x k ) = ( q α 1 ) p p w x 1 + + x k [ x + i = 1 k x i ] q α n + 1 q i = 1 k ( h α i ) x i d μ q ( x 1 ) d μ q ( x k ) + p p w x 1 + + x k [ x + i = 1 k x i ] q α n q i = 1 k ( h α i ) x i d μ q ( x 1 ) d μ q ( x k ) = ( q α 1 ) E ˜ n + 1 , q , w ( α ) ( h α , k | x ) + E ˜ n , q , w ( α ) ( h α , k | x ) .
(21)

Therefore, by (21), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 10. For n +, we have

q α x n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | x ) = ( q α - 1 ) n + 1 , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k | x ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( h - α , k | x ) .

Let d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2). Then we get

p p w x 1 + + x k [ x + j = 1 k x j ] q α n q j = 1 k ( h j ) x j d μ q ( x 1 ) d μ q ( x k ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] q k a 1 , , a k = 0 d 1 w a 1 + + a k q h j = 1 k a j j = 2 k ( j 1 ) a j ( 1 ) j = 1 k a j × p p w d ( x 1 + + x k ) [ x + j = 1 k a j d + j = 1 k x j ] q α d n q d j = 1 k ( h j ) x j d μ q d ( x 1 ) d μ q d ( x k ) .
(22)

Therefore, by (22), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 11. For d with d ≡ 1 (mod 2), we have

n , q , w ( α ) ( h , k | d x ) = [ d ] q α n [ d ] - q k a 1 , , a k = 0 d - 1 w a 1 + + a k q h j = 1 k a j - j = 2 k ( j - 1 ) a j ( - 1 ) j = 1 k a j n , q d , w d ( α ) h , k | x + a 1 + + a k d .

Let n , q , w ( α ) ( k , k | x ) = n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) . Then we get

( q α - 1 ) n n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) = l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) n - l q α l x [ 2 ] q k ( 1 + w q α l + k ) ( 1 + w q α l + 1 ) ,

and

p p w - ( x 1 + + x k ) [ k - x + i = 1 k x i ] q - α n q - i = 1 k ( k - i ) x i d μ - q - 1 ( x 1 ) d μ - q - 1 ( x k ) = q k 2 ( 1 - q - α ) n [ 2 ] q k l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x 1 ( 1 + w q α l + 1 ) ( 1 + w q α l + k ) = ( - 1 ) n q n α q k 2 [ 2 ] q k ( 1 - q α ) n l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l q α l x ( 1 + w q α l + 1 ) ( 1 + w q α l + k ) = ( - 1 ) n q α n + k 2 n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) .
(23)

Therefore, by (23), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 12. For n +, we have

n , q - 1 , w - 1 ( α ) ( k | k - x ) = ( - 1 ) n w k q α n + k 2 n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) .

Let x = k in Theorem 12. Then we see that

n , q - 1 , w - 1 ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = ( - 1 ) n w k q α n + k 2 n , q , w ( α ) ( k | k ) .
(24)

From (15), we note that

w q k n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x + 1 ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) = [ 2 ] q n , q , w ( α ) ( k - 1 | x ) .
(25)

It is easy to show that

( q α - 1 ) n n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = l = 0 n n l ( - 1 ) l + n [ 2 ] q k ( 1 + w q α l + 1 ) ( 1 + w q α l + k ) .

By simple calculation, we get

l = 0 n n l ( q α - 1 ) l p p w i = 1 k x k [ i = 1 k x k ] q α l q l = i k ( k - i ) x i d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = [ 2 ] q k ( 1 + w q α n + k ) ( 1 + w q α n + k - 1 ) ( 1 + w q α n + 1 ) .
(26)

From (26), we note that

l = 0 n n l ( q α - 1 ) l l , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = [ 2 ] q k ( 1 + w q α n + k ) ( 1 + w q α n + k - 1 ) ( 1 + w q α n + 1 ) ,

and

n , q , w ( α ) ( k | x ) = p p w i = 1 k x k [ x + i = 1 k x k ] q α n q i = 1 k ( k - i ) x i d μ - q ( x 1 ) d μ - q ( x k ) = l = 0 n n l [ x ] q α n - l q α l x l , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = q x α q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) + [ x ] q α n , n + ,

with the usual convention about replacing ( q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) ) n by n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) .

Put x = 0 in (25), we get

w q k n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 1 ) + n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = [ 2 ] q n , q ( α ) ( k - 1 | 0 ) .

Thus, we have

w q k ( q α q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) + 1 ) n + n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) = [ 2 ] q n , q , w ( α ) ( k - 1 | 0 ) ,

with the usual convention about replacing ( q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) ) n by n , q , w ( α ) ( k | 0 ) .

References

  1. Ryoo CS: On the generalized Barnes type multiple q -Euler polynomials twisted by ramified roots of unity. Proc Jangjeon Math Soc 2010, 13: 255–263.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ryoo CS: A note on the weighted q -Euler numbers and polynomials. Adv Stud Contemp Math 2011, 21: 47–54.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Moon E-J, Rim S-H, Jin J-H, Lee S-J: On the symmetric properties of higher-order twisted q -Euler numbers and polynomials. Adv Diff Equ 2010, 2010: 8. (Art ID 765259)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cangul IN, Kurt V, Ozden H, Simsek Y: On the higher-order w - q -Genocchi numbers. Adv Stud Contemp Math 2009, 19: 39–57.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Jang LC: A note on Nörlund-type twisted q -Euler polynomials and numbers of higher order associated with fermionic invariant q -integrals. J Inequal Appl 2010, 2010: 12. (Art ID 417452)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim T: q-Volkenborn integration. Russ J Math Phys 2002, 9: 288–299.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim T: A note on q-Volkenborn integration. Proc Jangjeon Math Soc 2005, 8: 13–17.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim T, Choi J, Kim YH: On extended Carlitz's type q -Euler numbers and polynomials. Adv Stud Contemp Math 2010, 20: 499–505.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim T: The modified q -Euler numbers and polynomials. Adv Stud Contemp Math 2008, 16: 161–170.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim T: q -Euler numbers and polynomials associated with p -adic q -integrals. J Nonlinear Math Phys 2007, 14: 15–27. 10.2991/jnmp.2007.14.1.3

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim T: Note on the Euler q -zeta functions. J Number Theory 2009, 129: 1798–1804. 10.1016/j.jnt.2008.10.007

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim T: Some identities on the q -Euler polynomials of higher order and q -Stirling numbers by the fermionic p -adic integral on p . Russ J Math Phys 2009, 16: 484–491. 10.1134/S1061920809040037

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim T: Barnes type multiple q -zeta function and q -Euler polynomials. J Phys A: Math Theor 2010, 43: 11. (Art ID 255201)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim T, Choi J, Kim YH, Ryoo CS: On the fermionic p -adic integral representation of Bernstein polynomials associated with Euler numbers and polynomials. J Inequal Appl 2010, 2010: 12. (Art ID 864247)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim T, Choi J, Kim YH, Ryoo CS: A note on the weighted p -adic q -Euler measure on p . Adv Stud Contemp Math 2011, 21: 35–40.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurt V: A further symmetric relation on the analogue of the Apostol-Bernoulli and the analogue of the Apostol-Genocchi polynomials. Appl Math Sci 2009, 3: 53–56.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the referee for his/her valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Young Lee.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H.Y., Jung, N.S., Kang, J.Y. et al. Some identities on the higher-order-twisted q-Euler numbers and polynomials with weight α. Adv Differ Equ 2012, 21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-21

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-21

Keywords