Oscillation of a class of second-order linear impulsive differential equations
© Tariboon and Thiramanus; licensee Springer 2012
Received: 15 August 2012
Accepted: 13 November 2012
Published: 27 November 2012
In this paper, we investigate the oscillation of a class of second-order linear impulsive differential equations of the form
By using the equivalence transformation and the associated Riccati techniques, some interesting results are obtained.
Impulsive differential equations are recognized as adequate mathematical models for studying evolution processes that are subject to abrupt changes in their states at certain moments. Many applications in physics, biology, control theory, economics, applied sciences and engineering exhibit impulse effects (see [1–4]). In recent years, the study of the oscillation of all solutions of impulsive differential equations have been the subject of many research works. See, for example, [5–11] and the references cited therein.
Let be an interval and .
satisfies for and ,
, for each , and and are left continuous for each , .
Definition 1.1 A nontrivial solution of Eq. (1.1) is said to be nonoscillatory if the solution is eventually positive or eventually negative. Otherwise, it is said to be oscillatory. Eq. (1.1) is said to be oscillatory if all solutions are oscillatory.
In  Luo et al. and  Guo et al. gave some excellent results on the oscillation and nonoscillation of Eq. (1.2) by using associated Riccati techniques and an equivalence transformation. Moreover, Luo et al. showed that the oscillation of Eq. (1.2) can be caused by impulsive perturbations, though the corresponding equation without impulses admits a nonoscillatory solution.
The Langevin equation (first formulated by Langevin in 1908) is found to be an effective tool to describe the evolution of physical phenomena in fluctuating environments. For more details of the Langevin equation without impulses and its applications, we refer the reader to .
2 Main results
Now we are in the position to establish the main result.
is oscillatory, then Eq. (1.1) is oscillatory, where , .
Proof For the sake of contradiction, suppose that Eq. (1.1) has an eventually positive solution . Then there exists a constant such that for .
Therefore, is continuous on .
This implies that is an eventually positive solution of Eq. (2.1) which is a contradiction. A similar argument can be used to prove that Eq. (2.1) cannot have an eventually negative solution. Therefore, from Definition 1.1, the solution of Eq. (2.1) is oscillatory. The proof is complete. □
Lemma 2.2 (Leighton type oscillation criteria)
Assume that the functions and .
which is a contradiction. Thus, the solution is oscillatory. The proof is complete. □
where , . Then Eq. (1.1) is oscillatory.
We get that is an eventually positive solution of (2.12), a contradiction, and so the proof is complete. □
Then Eq. (2.12) is oscillatory.
3 Some examples
In this section, we illustrate our results with two examples.
where denotes the greatest integer function.
By Theorem 2.3, Eq. (3.1) is oscillatory.
By Corollary 2.5, Eq. (3.2) is oscillatory.
This research work is financially supported by the Office of the Higher Education Commission of Thailand, and King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand.
- Lakshmikantham V, Bainov DD, Simeonov PS: Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1989.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bainov DD, Simeonov PS: Impulsive Differential Equations: Periodic Solutions and Applications. Longman, Harlow; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Bainov DD, Simeonov PS: Impulsive Differential Equations: Asymptotic Properties of the Solutions. World Scientific, Singapore; 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Samoilenko AM, Perestyuk NA: Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal RP, Karakoç F: A survey on oscillation of impulsive delay differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 60: 1648–1685. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.047MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal RP, Karakoç F, Zafer A: A survey on oscillation of impulsive ordinary differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2010., 2010: Article ID 354841Google Scholar
- Guo Z, Zhou X, Ge W: Interval oscillation criteria for second-order forced impulsive differential equations with mixed nonlinearities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 381: 187–201. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.02.073MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Liu Z, Sun Y: Interval criteria for oscillation of a forced impulsive differential equation with Riemann-Stieltjes integral. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63: 1577–1586. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.010MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Özbekler A, Zafer A: Leighton-Coles-Wintner type oscillation criteria for half-linear impulsive differential equations. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2010, 5: 205–214.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Özbekler A, Zafer A: Nonoscillation and oscillation of second-order impulsive differential equations with periodic coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 294–300. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.001MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Özbekler A, Zafer A: Oscillation of solutions of second order mixed nonlinear differential equations under impulsive perturbations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 933–940. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.041MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Luo Z, Shen J: Oscillation of second order linear differential equations with impulses. Appl. Math. Lett. 2007, 20: 75–81. 10.1016/j.aml.2006.01.019MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Guo C, Xu Z: On the oscillation of second order linear impulsive differential equations. Diff. Equ. Appl. 2010, 2: 319–330.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Coffey WT, Kalmykov YP, Waldron JT: The Langevin Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering. World Scientific, Singapore; 2004.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Leighton W: On self-adjoint differential equations of second order. J. Lon. Math. Soc. 1952, 27: 37–43. 10.1112/jlms/s1-27.1.37MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Swanson GA: Comparison and Oscillation Theory of Linear Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York; 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal RP, O’Regan D: An Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer, New York; 2008.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kelley WG, Peterson AC: The Theory of Differential Equations: Classical and Qualitative. Springer, New York; 2010.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.