- Research
- Open Access

# Mild solutions for a problem involving fractional derivatives in the nonlinearity and in the non-local conditions

- Nasser-eddine Tatar
^{1}Email author

**2011**:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2011-18

© Tatar; licensee Springer. 2011

**Received:**21 November 2010**Accepted:**29 June 2011**Published:**29 June 2011

## Abstract

A second-order abstract problem of neutral type with derivatives of non-integer order in the nonlinearity as well as in the nonlocal conditions is investigated. This model covers many of the existing models in the literature. It extends the integer order case to the fractional case in the sense of Caputo. A fixed point theorem is used to prove existence of mild solutions.

**AMS Subject Classification**

26A33, 34K40, 35L90, 35L70, 35L15, 35L07

## Keywords

- Cauchy problem
- Cosine family
- Fractional derivative
- Mild solutions
- Neutral second-order abstract problem

## 1 Introduction

with 0 ≤ *α*, *β*, *γ* ≤ 1. Here, the prime denotes time differentiation and ^{
C
}
*D*
^{
κ
}, *κ = α*, *β*, *γ* denotes fractional time differentiation (in the sense of Caputo). The operator *A* is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous cosine family *C*(*t*), *t* ≥ 0 of bounded linear operators in the Banach space *X* and *f*, *g* are nonlinear functions from **R**
^{+} × *X* × *X* to *X*, *u*
^{0} and *u*
^{1} are given initial data in *X*. The functions *p* : [*C*(*I*; *X*)]^{2} → *X*, *q* : [*C*(*I*; *X*)]^{2} → *X* are given continuous functions (see the example at the end of the paper).

This problem has been studied in case *α*, *β*, *γ* are 0 or 1 (see [1–8]). Well-posedness has been established using different fixed point theorems and the theory of strongly continuous cosine families in Banach spaces. We refer the reader to [7, 9, 10] for a good account on the theory of cosine families.

Fractional non-local conditions are the natural generalization of the integer order non-local conditions as studied by Hernandez [5] and others. They include the discrete case where the solution is prescribed at some finite number of times.

Time delay is a natural phenomena which occurs in many problems (see [11, 12]). It is caused for instance by the finite switching speed of amplifiers in electronic networks or finite speed for signal propagation in biological networks. We can trace problems with delays back to Volterra who introduced past states in population dynamics. It has been also introduced by Boltzmann in viscoelasticity in the form of a convolution. When there is a dependence on all past states we usually call such a delay a distributed delay. There are in fact several types of delays. The importance of delays has been pointed out by many researchers and we are now witnessing a growing interest in such problems. An important class of delayed differential equations (or functional differential equations) is the class of neutral differential equations. In this type of problems the delayed argument occurs in the derivative of the state variable. This is the case, for instance, when a growing population consumes more (or less) food than matured one or when this term appears in the constitutive relationship between the stress and the strain. In fact, neutral differential equations arise naturally in biology, ecology, electronics, economics, epidemiology, control theory and mechanics [11–18]. More precisely, they appear in the study of oscillatory systems, electrical networks containing lossless transmission line (high-speed computers, distributed non-lumped transmission line, lossless transmission line terminated by a tunnel diode and lumped parallel capacitor) [11, 13, 15, 18], vibrating masses attached to an elastic bar [11, 12], automatic control, neuro-mechanical systems and some variational problems (Euler equations) [14, 16, 17]. For the sake of simplicity and since the case where time delay exists in the function "*g*" has been already studied before (at least for some types of delays) we shall focus on the distributed delay present in the nonlinearity "*f* ".

We consider the case (*g* ≢ 0) and prove existence of mild solutions under different conditions on the different data. In particular, this work may be viewed as an extension of the work in [6] to the fractional order case. Indeed, the work in [6] is concerned with the first-order derivatives whereas here we treat the fractional order case where some difficulties arise because of the non-local nature of the fractional derivatives. In addition to that, to the best of the author's knowledge, fractional derivatives are introduced here for such problems for the first time.

The next section of this paper contains some notation and preliminary results needed in our proofs. Section 3 treats the existence of a mild solution in the space of continuously differentiable functions. An example is provided to illustrate our finding.

## 2 Preliminaries

In this section, we present some notation, assumptions and preliminary results needed in our proofs later.

*is called the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of h of order α >* 0 *when the right side exists*.

See [19–22] for more on fractional derivatives and fractional integrals.

We will assume that **(H1)** *A* is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous cosine family *C*(*t*), *t* ∈ **R**, of bounded linear operators in the Banach space *X*.

For simplicity, we will designate by
and
bounds for *C*(*t*) and *S*(*t*) on *I* = [0, *T*], respectively.

then we have

*Suppose that* (*H1*) *holds*, *v* : **R** → *X a continuously differentiable function and*
. *Then*, *q*(*t*) ∈ *D*(*A*),
*and*

**Definition 3**.

*A continuously differentiable function u satisfying the integro-differential equation*

*is called a mild solution of problem* (1).

This definition follows directly from the definition of the cosine family and (1), see [6, 7].

## 3 Existence of mild solutions

In this section, we prove existence of a mild solution in the space *C*
^{1}(*I*; *X*). Before we proceed with the assumptions on the different data we recall that *E* is a Banach space when endowed with the norm ||*x*||_{
E
} = ||*x*|| + sup_{0≤t≤1}||*AS*(*t*)*x*||, *x* ∈ *E* (see [23]). It is also well-known that *AS*(*t*) : *E* → *X* is a bounded linear operator. By *B*
_{
r
}(*x*, *X*) we will denote the closed ball in *X* centered at *x* and of radius *r*.

*f*,

*g*,

*p*and

*q*are

**(H2)**

- (i)
*f*(*t*,.,.) :*X*×*X*→*X*is continuous for a.e.*t*∈*I*. - (ii)
For every (

*x*,*y*) ∈*X*×*X*, the function*f*(.,*x*,*y*) :*I*→*X*is strongly measurable. - (iii)There exist a nonnegative continuous function
*K*_{ f }(*t*) and a continuous nondecreasing positive function Ω_{ f }such thatfor (

*t*,*x*,*y*) ∈*I*×*X*×*X*. - (iv)
For each

*r >*0, the set*f*(*I*×*B*_{ r }(0,*X*^{2})) is relatively compact in*X*.

**(H3)**

- (i)
The function

*g*takes its values in*E*and*g*:*I*×*X*×*X*→*X*is continuous. - (ii)There exist a nonnegative continuous function
*K*_{ g }(*t*), a continuous non-decreasing positive function Ω_{ g }and two positive constants*C*_{1},*C*_{2}such thatfor (

*t*,*x*,*y*) ∈*I*×*X*×*X*. - (iii)
The family of functions {

*t*→*g*(*t*,*u*,*v*);*u*,*v*∈*B*_{ r }(0,*C*(*I*;*X*))} is equicontinuous on*I*. - (iv)
For each

*r >*0, the set*g*(*I*×*B*_{ r }(0,*X*^{2})) is relatively compact in*E*.

**(H4)** *u*
^{0}+*p* : [*C*(*I*; *X*)]^{2} → *E* (takes its values in *E*) and *q* : [*C*(*I*; *X*)]^{2} → *X* are completely continuous.

*N*

_{ p }and

*N*

_{ q }will denote bounds for ||

*u*

^{0}+

*p*(

*u*,

*v*)||

_{ E }and ||

*q*(

*u*,

*v*)||, respectively. To lighten the statement of our result we denote by

We are now ready to state and prove our result.

*then problem* (1) *admits a mild solution u* ∈ *C*
^{1}([0, *T*]).

*C*([0,

*T*])]

^{2}into

*C*([0,

*T*]). These maps are nothing but the right hand side of (2) and its derivative. We would like to apply the Leray-Schauder alternative [which states that either the set of solutions of (6) (below) is unbounded or we have a fixed point in

*D*(containing zero) a convex subset of

*X*provided that the mappings Φ and Ψ are completely continuous]. To this end, we first prove that the set of solutions (

*u*

_{ λ },

*v*

_{ λ }) of

This (with (3)) shows that Θ_{λ}(*t*) and thereafter the set of solutions of (6) is bounded in [*C*(*I*; *X*)]^{2} :

*t*∈

*I*and

*h*such that

*t*+

*h*∈

*I*. In virtue of (H1) and (H3), for

*t*∈

*I*and

*ε >*0 given, there exists

*δ >*0 such that

*s*∈ [0,

*t*] and , when |

*h*|

*< δ*. This together with (H2), (H3) and the fact that

*S*(

*t*) is Lipschitzian imply that

for some positive constant *N*
_{
l
}
*:* The equicontinuity is therefore established.

*t*∈

*I*, as (

*s*,ξ) →

*C*(

*t - s*)ξ is continuous from to

*X*and is relatively compact,

and co(*U*(*t*, *s*
_{
i
}, *r*)) designates its convex hull. Therefore,
is relatively compact in *X*. By Ascoli-Arzela Theorem,
is relatively compact in *C*(*I*; *X*) and consequently Φ_{3} is completely continuous. Similarly, we may prove that Ψ is completely continuous.

We conclude that (Φ, Ψ) admits a fixed point in [*C*([0, *T*])]^{2} .

*where* 0 ≤ *α*
_{
i
}, *β*
_{
j
}, *γ*
_{
k
} ≤ 1, *i* = 1,..., *n*, *j* = 1,..., *m*, *k* = 1,...,*r*.

**Remark 2**.

*If g does not depend on u'*(

*t*),

*that is for g*(

*t*,

*u*(

*t*)),

*we may avoid the condition that g must be an E-valued function*.

*We require instead that g be continuously differentiable and apply Lemma*2

*to*

*in* (5).

*X*=

*L*

^{2}([0,

*π*]). This problem can be reformulated in the abstract setting (1). To this end, we define the operator

*Ay*=

*y"*with domain

*A*has a discrete spectrum with

*-n*

^{2},

*n*= 1, 2,... as eigenvalues and ,

*n*= 1, 2,... as their corresponding normalized eigenvectors. So we may write

*-A*is positive and self-adjoint in

*L*

^{2}([0,

*π*]), the operator

*A*is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous cosine family

*C*(

*t*),

*t*∈

**R**which has the form

*s*to be of the form d

*μ*(

*s*) and d

*η*(

*s*) (Lebesgue-Stieltjes measures) for non-decreasing functions

*μ*and

*η*(or even more general:

*μ*and

*η*of bounded variation), that is

which have been extensively studied by several authors in the integer order case.

Under appropriate conditions on *F*, *G*, *P* and *Q* which make (H2)-(H4) hold for the corresponding *f*, *g*, *p* and *q*, Theorem 1 ensures the existence of a mild solution to problem (10).

Some special cases of this problem may be found in [24–28]. They model some phenomena with hereditary properties. See also [29–33] for some problems with fractional boundary conditions.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The author is very grateful for the financial support provided by King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals through the project No. IN 100007.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Benchohra M, Ntouyas SK:
**Existence of mild solutions of second order initial value problems for delay integrodifferential inclusions with nonlocal conditions.***Math Bohemica*2002,**4**(127):613-622.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Benchohra M, Ntouyas SK:
**Existence results for the semiinfinite interval for first and second-order integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces with nonlocal conditions.***Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Rer Nat Math*2002,**41:**13-19.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Benchohra M, Ntouyas SK:
**Existence results for multivalued semilinear functional differential equations.***Extr Math*2003,**18**(1):1-12.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Byszewski L, Laksmikantham V:
**Theorems about the existence and uniqueness of a solution of a nonlocal abstract Cauchy problem in a Banach space.***Appl Anal*1991,**40**(1):11-19. 10.1080/00036819008839989MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Hernandez ME:
**Existence results for a second order abstract Cauchy problem with nonlocal conditions.***Electron J Differ Equ*2005,**2005**(73):1-17.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Hernandez EM, Henríquez HR, McKibben MA:
**Existence of solutions for second order partial neutral functional differential equations.***Integr Equ Oper Theory*2008,**62:**191-217. 10.1007/s00020-008-1618-1View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Travis CC, Webb GF:
**Cosine families and abstract nonlinear second order differential equations.***Acta Math Acad Sci Hung*1978,**32:**76-96.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Travis CC, Webb GF:
**An abstract second order semilinear Volterra integrodifferential equation.***SIAM J Math Anal*1979,**10**(2):412-424. 10.1137/0510038MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Fattorini HO:
**Second Order Linear Differential Equations in Banach Spaces.***North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North-Holland, Amsterdam*1985.,**108:**Google Scholar - Travis CC, Webb GF:
**Compactness, regularity and uniform continuity properties of strongly continuous cosine families.***Houston J Math*1977,**3**(4):555-567.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - El'sgol'tz LE:
*Introduction to the Theory of Differential Equations with Deviating Arguments.*Holden-Day, San Francisco; 1966.Google Scholar - Hale JK:
*Theory of Functional Differential Equations.*Springer-Verlag, New York; 1977.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - El'sgol'tz LE:
**Qualitative Methods in Mathematical Analysis.***Transaction on Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence*1964.,**12:**Google Scholar - Hughes DK:
**Variational and optimal control problems with delayed arguments.***J Optim Theory Appl*1968,**2:**1-14. 10.1007/BF00927159View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Nagumo J, Shimura M:
**Self-oscillation in a transmission line with a tunnel diode.***Proc IRE*1961,**49:**1281-1291.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rubanik VP:
*Oscillations of Quasilinear Systems with Retardation.*Nauk, Moscow; 1969.Google Scholar - Sabbagh LD:
**Variational problems with lags.***J Optim Theory Appl*1969,**3:**34-51. 10.1007/BF00929540MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Shimura M:
**Analysis of some nonlinear phenomena in a transmission line.***IEEE Trans Circ Theory*1967,**14:**60-68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Miller KS, Ross B:
*An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations.*Wiley, New York; 1993.Google Scholar - Oldham KB, Spanier J:
*The Fractional Calculus.*Academic Press, New York; 1974.Google Scholar - Podlubny I:
**Fractional Differential Equations.**In*Mathematics in Sciences and Engineering*.*Volume 198*. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.Google Scholar - Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI:
**Fractional Integrals and Derivatives.***Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach, Yverdon*1993.Google Scholar - Kisyński J:
**On cosine operator functions and some parameter group of operators.***Stud Math*1972,**49:**93-105.MATHGoogle Scholar - Chen W, Holm S:
**Modified Szabo's wave equation models for lossy media obeying frequency power law.***J Acoust Soc Am*2003,**114**(5):2570-2575. 10.1121/1.1621392View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Fukunaga M, Shimizu N:
**Role of prehistories in the initial value problem of fractional viscoelastic equations.***Nonlinear Dyn*2004,**38:**207-220. 10.1007/s11071-004-3756-6MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Haddar H, Li J-R, Matignon D:
**Efficient solution of a wave equation with fractional-order dissipative terms.***J Comput Appl Math*2010,**234**(6):2003-2010. 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.051MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Hedrich KS, Filipovski A:
**Longitudinal creep vibrations of a fractional derivative order rheological rod with variable cross section.***Facta Univ Ser Mech Autom Control Robot*2002,**3**(12):327-349.MATHGoogle Scholar - Orsingher E, Beghin L:
**Time-fractional telegraph equations and telegraph processes with Brownian time. Probab.***Theory Relat Fields*2004,**128:**141-160. 10.1007/s00440-003-0309-8MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kirane M, Tatar N-e:
**Absence of local solutions to an elliptic system with time-fractional dynamical boundary conditions.***Sib Math J*2007,**48**(3):477-488. 10.1007/s11202-007-0050-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Labidi S, Tatar N-e:
**Blow up for the Euler-Bernoulli beam problem with a fractional boundary condition.***Dyn Syst Appl*2008,**17:**109-120.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Labidi S, Tatar N-e:
**Unboundedness for the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with fractional boundary dissipation.***Appl Math Comp*2005,**161**(3):697-706. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.057MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Labidi S, Tatar N-e:
**Breakdown for a Kirchhoff type beam with a fractional boundary feedback.***J Dyn Control Syst*2008,**14**(1):71-94. 10.1007/s10883-007-9031-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Mbodje B:
**Wave energy decay under fractional derivative controls.***IMA J Math Control Inf*2006,**23**(2):237-257.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.