Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Some new results for BVPs of first-order nonlinear integro-differential equations of volterra type

Advances in Difference Equations20112011:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2011-14

  • Received: 7 December 2010
  • Accepted: 22 June 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

In this work we present some new results concerning the existence of solutions for first-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with boundary value conditions. Our methods to prove the existence of solutions involve new differential inequalities and classical fixed-point theorems.

MR(2000)Subject Classification. 34D09,34D99.

Keywords

  • Boundary value problems
  • integro-differential equations
  • fixed-point motheds

1. Introduction and preliminaries

As is known, integro-differential equations find many applications in various mathematical problems, see Cordunean's book [1], Guo et al.'s book [2] and references therein for details. For the recent developments involving existence of solutions to BVPs for integro-differential equations and impulsive integro-differential equations we can refer to [317]. So far the main method appeared in the references to guarantee the existence of solutions is the method of upper and low solutions. Motivated by the ideas in the recent works [18, 19], we come up with a new approach to ensure the existence of at least one solution for certain family of first-order nonlinear integro-differential equations with periodic boundary value conditions or antiperiodic boundary value conditions. Our methods involve new differential inequalities and the classical fixed-point theory.

This paper mainly considers the existence of solutions for the following first-order nonlinear integro-differential system with periodic boundary value conditions.
(1.1)
and first-order integro-differential system with "non-periodic" conditions.
(1.2)
where (Kx)(t) denotes

with k i (t, s) : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, +∞) continuous for i = 1, 2, , n; A and B are n × n matrices with real valued elements, θ is the zero vector in n . For A = (a ij ) n × n , we denote ||A|| by . In what follows, we assume function f : [0, 1] × n × n n is continuous, and det (A + B) ≠ 0.

Noticing that det (A+B) ≠ 0, conditions Ax(0)+Bx(1) = θ do not include the periodic conditions x(0) = x(1). Furthermore, if A = B = I, where I denotes n × n identity matrix, then Ax(0)+Bx(1) = θ reduces to the so-called "anti-periodic" conditions x(0) = -x(1). The authors of [2024] consider this kind of "anti-periodic" conditions for differential equations or impulsive differential equations. To the best of our knowledge it is the first article to deal with integro-differential equations with "anti-periodic" conditions so far.

We are also concerned with the following BPVP of integro-differential equations of mixed type:
(1.3)
where function f : [0, 1] × n × n × n n is continuous, (Lx) (t) denotes

with l i (t, s) : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → , i = 1, 2, , n being continuous.

This article is organized as follows. In Sect. 1 we give some preliminaries. Section 2 presents some existence theorems for PVPs (1.1), (1.3) and a couple of examples to illustrate how our newly developed results work. In Sect. 3 we focus on the existence of solutions for (1.2) and also an example is given.

In what follows, if x, y n , then 〈x, y〉 denotes the usual inner product and ||x|| denotes the Euclidean norm of x on n . Let
with the norm

The following well-known fixed-point theorem will be used in the proof of Theorem 3.3.

Theorem 1.1 (Schaefer)[25]. Let X be a normed space with H : XX a compact mapping. If the set

is bounded, then H has at least one fixed-point.

2. Existence results for periodic conditions

To begin with, we consider the following periodic boundary value problem
(2.1)

where g : [0, 1] × n × n n and m : [0, 1] → are both continuous functions, with m having no zeros in [0, 1].

Lemma 2.1. The BVP (2.1) is equivalent to the integral equation

Proof. The result can be obtained by direct computation.

Theorem 2.1. Let g and m be as in Lemma 2.1. Assume that there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(2.2)
and
(2.3)

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (2.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Let C = C([0, 1], R n ) and Ω = {x(t) C, ||x(t)|| C < R}. Define an operator by
(2.4)

for all t [0, 1].

Since g is continuous, see that T is also a continuous map. It is easy to verify the operator T is compact by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. Indeed, for the ball Ω,
(2.5)
implies
Define H λ = I - λT, λ [0, 1], where I is the identity. So if (2.5) is true, then from the homotopy principle of Schauder degree [[25], Chap.4.], we have

Therefore, it follows from the non-zero property of Leray-Schauder degree that H 1(x) = x - Tx = 0 has at least one x Ω.

Now our problem is reduced to prove that (2.5) is true. Observe that the family of problems
(2.6)
is equivalent to the family of PBVPs
(2.7)
Consider the function r(t) = ||x(t)||2, t [0, 1], where x(t) is a solution of (2.7). Then r(t) is differentiable and we have by the product rule
Denote
Let x be a solution of (2.6) with We now show that x ∂Ω. From (2.5) and (2.3) we have, for each t [0, 1] and each λ [0, 1],

Then it follows from (2.2) that x Ω. Thus, (2.5) is true and the proof is completed.

Corollary 2.1. Let g and m be as in Lemma 2.1 with m(t) < 0, t [0, 1]. If there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and
(2.8)

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}, then PBVP (2.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Multiply both sides of (2.8) by λ [0, 1] to obtain

It completes the proof.

Now consider the existence of solutions of PBVP (1.1). It is easy to see (1.1) is equivalent to the PBVP
(2.9)
Theorem 2.2. If there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(2.10)
and
(2.11)

where M(R) is a positive constant dependent on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}, then PBVP (1.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Consider the PVPB (2.9), which is of the form (2.1) with m(t) ≡ - 1 and g(t, x, (Kx)(t)) = f (t, x, (Kx)(t)) - x. Clearly,

So, (2.2) reduces to (2.10). Besides, (2.3) reduces to (2.11). Hence the result follows from Theorem 2.1.

Corollary 2.2. Assume there are constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(2.12)
and
(2.13)

where M (R) is a positive constant dependent on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (1.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Multiply both sides of (2.13) by λ [0, 1] to obtain
Considering that

we have (2.11) is true if (2.13) is true. Then the proof is completed.

Now an example is provided to show how our theorems work.

Example 2.1 1. Consider the following PBVP with n = 2.
(2.14)
Figure 1
Figure 1

Figure of Example 2.1

Let us show (2.14) has at least one solution (x(t), y(t)) with , t [0, 1].

It is clear that (2.14) has no constant solution. Let u = (x, y), and . First note that for .

Then
On the other hand,
Clearly,
So for some R ≤ 90 and α = 5, we have
where . Now it is sufficient to find a positive constant R satisfying
(2.15)

It is easy to see that any number in satisfies (2.15). Then our conclusion follows from Corollary 2.2.

In what follows we focus on the first-order integro-differential equations of mixed type in the form of (1.2). The results presented in the following three statements are similar to Theorem 2.1, Theorem 2.2 and Corollary 2.2, respectively. So we omit all the proofs here.

Consider the following periodic boundary value problem
(2.16)

where g : [0, 1] × n × n × n n and m : [0, 1] → are both continuous functions, with m having no zeros in [0, 1].

Theorem 2.3. Assume there are constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (2.16) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Theorem 2.4. Suppose there are constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (1.2) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Corollary 2.3. If there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(2.17)
and
(2.18)

where M(R) is a positive constant dependent on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}, then PBVP (1.3) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Now we give an example to illustrate how to apply our theorems.

Example 2.2 2. Consider the following PBVP with n = 2.
(2.19)
Figure 2
Figure 2

Figure of Example 2.2

We prove that (2.19) has at least one solution (x(t), y(t)) with , t [0, 1].

First note that (2.19) has no constant solution. Let u = (x, y), and .

Since and , we obtain
On the other hand,
Clearly,
Thus,
where
Now it is sufficient to find a positive constant R satisfying

We compute directly . Then our conclusion follows from Corollary 2.3.

Notice that the conclusion of Theorem 2.1 still holds if (2.3) is replaced by

Now we modify Theorem 2.1 and Corollary 2.2 to obtain some new results.

Theorem 2.5. Let g and m be as in Lemma 2.1. Assume there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and
(2.20)

where M(R) is a positive constant dependent on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (2.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1 except choosing r(t) = - ||x(t) ||2 instead.

See that (1.1) is equivalent to the PBVP
(2.21)
Corollary 2.4. Suppose there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and
(2.22)

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then PBVP (1.1) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Consider PVPB (2.21), which is in the form from (2.1) with m(t) ≡ 1 and g(t, x, (Kx)(t)) = f(t, x, (Kx)(t)) + x. Clearly,
Multiply both sides of (2.22) by λ [0, 1] to obtain

Then the conclusion follows from Theorem 2.5.

Remark 2.1. Corollary 2.4 and Corollary 2.2 differ in sense that Corollary 2.4 may apply to certain problems, whereas Corollary 2.2 may not apply, and vice-versa.

Example 2.3 3. Let us prove that the PBVP
Figure 3
Figure 3

Figure of Example 2.3

(2.23)

has at least one solution x(t) with |x(t)| < 1, t [0, 1].

Denote . It is clearly that for all (t, x) [0, 1] × B R ,
Then for all (t, x) [0, 1] × B R ,
On the other hand,
Taking into account that
we choose

It is not difficult to check that if R [0.5, 2]. So the conclusion follows from Corollary 2.4.

Remark 2.2 Since the coefficient of x 3 is negative, it appears impossible to find two constants R > 0 and α ≥ 0 satisfying (2.12) and (2.13) at the same time.

3. Existence results for "non-periodic" conditions

In this section we study the problem of existence of solutions for BVP (1.2).

Lemma 3.1. The BVP (1.2) is equivalent to the integral equation

Proof. The result can be obtained by direct computation.

Theorem 3.1. Assume det B ≠ 0 and ||B -1 A|| ≤ 1. Suppose there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(3.1)
and
(3.2)

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, BR = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then BVP (1.2) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Let C = C([0, 1], R n ) and Ω = {x(t) C, ||x(t)|| C < Rg. Define an operator by
(3.3)
Since f is continuous, we see that T is also a continuous map. It is easy to verify that the operator T is compact by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. It is sufficient to prove
(3.4)
See that the family of problems
(3.5)
is equivalent to the family of BVPs
(3.6)
Consider function r(t) = ||x(t)||2, t [0, 1], where x(t) is a solution of (3.6). By the product rule we have
Note that ||B -1 A||| ≤ 1 implies
Let x be a solution of (3.5) with . We now show that x Ω. From (3.2) and (3.3) we obtain, for each t [0, 1] and each λ [0, 1],

Then it follows from (3.1) that x Ω. Thus, (3.4) is true and the proof is completed.

Corollary 3.1 Let f be a scalar-valued function in (1.1). and assume there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and
(3.8)
where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , |x| ≤ R}. Then anti-periodic boundary value problem

has at least one solution x C[0, 1] with |x(t)| < R, t [0, 1].

Proof. Since A = B = 1, we have , B -1 A = 1, . Then the conclusion follows from Lemma 3.1.

Example 3.1. Let us show that
(3.9)

has at least one solution x(t) with |x(t)| < 1, t [0, 1].

Denoting , we see that, for all (t, x) [0, 1] × B R ,
On the other hand,
Since
we choose
Then

It is not difficult to check that . So, the conclusion follows from Corollary 3.1.

Now we modify Theorem 3.1 to include another class of f.

Theorem 3.2. Assume det B ≠ 0 and ||A -1 B|| ≤ 1. Suppose there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
and
(3.10)

where M(R) is a positive constant depending on R, B R = {x n , ||x|| ≤ R}. Then BVP (1.2) has at least one solution x C with ||x|| C < R.

Proof. Note that ||A -1 B|| ≤ 1 implies

Introducing the function r(t) = -||x(t) ||2, t [0, 1], where x(t) is a solution of (3.6), for the rest part of the proof we proceed as in the proof of Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.2 Let f be a scalar-valued function in (1.1). If there exist constants R > 0, α ≥ 0 such that
(3.11)
and
(3.12)
where M(R) is a positive constant dependent on R, B R = {x n , |x| ≤ R}. Then anti-periodic boundary value problem

has at least one solution x C[0, 1] with |x(t)| < R, t [0, 1].

Proof. Since A = B = 1, we have , A -1 B = 1, . Then the conclusion follows from Lemma 3.2.

In what follows, we discuss the problem of existence of solutions for (1.2) with f satisfying

where nonnegative functions p, q, r L 1[0, 1]. We denote for any function x L 1 [0, 1].

Theorem 3.3. Assume (*) is true and
(3.13)

where . Then (1.2) has at least one solution.

Proof. Let C = C([0, 1], R n ). Define an operator T : CC by
As we discussed in the proof of Theorem 3.1, T is compact. Taking into account that the family of BVP (1.2) is equivalent to the family of problem x = Tx, our problem is reduced to show that T has a least one fixed point. For this purpose, we apply Schaefer's Theorem by showing that all potential solutions of
(3.14)
are bounded a priori, with the bound being independent of λ. With this in mind, let x be a solution of (3.14). Note that x is also a solution of (3.6). We have, for t [0, 1] and λ [0, 1],
Thus,
It then follows from (3.13) that

The proof is completed.

Remark 3.1. If A = B = I, then (2.13) reduces to
We can also extend the discussion to the existence of at least one solution for integro-differential equations of mixed type with "anti-periodic" conditions.

We omit it here because it is trivial.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (10971139), Shanghai municipal education commission(No. 10YZ72)and Shanghai municipal education commission(No. 09YZ149).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, 200234, People's Republic of China

References

  1. Corduneanu C: Integral Equations and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Guo D, Lakshmikantham V, Liu X: Nonlinear Integral Equations in Abstract Spaces. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal R, Bohner M, Domoshnitsky A, Goltser Y: Floquet theory and stability of nonlinear integro-differential equations. Acta Math Hungar 2005, 109: 305-330. 10.1007/s10474-005-0250-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Franco D: Green's functions and comparison results for impulsive integro-differential eqations. Nonlinear Anal 2001, 47: 5723-5728. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00674-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo D: Initial value problems for integro-differential equaitons of Volterra type in Banach spaces. J Appl Math Stochastic Anal 1994, 7: 13-23. 10.1155/S104895339400002XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. He Z, He X: Monotone iterative technique for impulsive integro-differential equations with periodic boundary conditions. Comput Math Appl 2004, 48: 73-84. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.01.005MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. He Z, He X: Periodic boundary value problems for first order impulsive integro-differential equations of mixed type. J Math Anal Appl 2004, 296: 8-20. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.047MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jankowski T, Jankowski R: On integro-differential equations with delayed arguments. Dyn Continuous Discrete Impuls Syst Ser A Math Anal 2006, 13: 101-115.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Ladde GS, Sathanantham S: Periodic boundary value problem for impulsive integro-differential equations of Volterra type. J Math Phys Sci 1991, 25: 119-129.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Li J, Shen J: Periodic boundary value problems for impulsive integro-differential equations of mixed type. Appl Math Comput 2006, 183: 890-902. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.037MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nieto JJ, Rodriguez Lopez R: Periodic boundary value problems for non-Lipschitzian impulsive functional differential equations. J Math Anal Appl 2006, 318: 593-610. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.014MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Song G: Initial value problems for systems of integro-differential equations in Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2001, 264: 68-75. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7630MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Song G, Zhu X: Extremal solutions of periodic boundary value problems for first order integro-differential equations of mixed type. J Math Anal Appl 2004, 300: 1-11. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.060MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Xing Y, Han M, Zheng G: Initial value problem for first order integro-differential equation of Volterra type on time scales. Nonlinear Anal 2005, 60: 429-442.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Xing Y, Ding W, Han M: Periodic boundary value problems of integro-differential equations of Volterra type on time scales. Nonlinear Anal 2008, 68: 127-138. 10.1016/j.na.2006.10.036MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu H, Nieto JJ: Extremal solutions of a class of nonlinear integro-differential equations in Banach spaces. Proc Am Math Soc 1997, 125: 2605-2614. 10.1090/S0002-9939-97-04149-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang X, Jiang D, Li X, Wang K: A new existence theory for single and multiple positive periodic solutions to Volterra integro-differential equations with impulse effects. Comput Math Appl 2006, 51: 17-32. 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.09.002MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tisdell CC: Existence of solutions to first -order periodic boundary value problems. J Math Anal Appl 2006,323(2):1325-1332. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.11.047MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tisdell CC: On first-order discrete boundary value problems. J Diff Equ Appl 2006, 12: 1213-1223. 10.1080/10236190600949790MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen Y, Nieto JJ, O'Regan D: Anti-periodic solutions for fully nonlinear first-order differential equations. Math Comput Modell 2007,46(9-10):1183-1190. 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.12.006MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ding W, Xing Y, Han M: Anti-periodic boundary value problems for first order impulsive functional differential equations. Appl Math Comput 2007, 186: 45-53. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.087MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Franco D, Nieto JJ, O'Regan D: Anti-periodic boundary value problem for nonlinear first order ordinary differential equations. Math Inequal Appl 2003, 6: 477-485.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Luo ZG, Shen JH, Nieto JJ: Antiperiodic boundary value problem for first -order impulsive ordinary differential equations. Comput Math Appl 2005, 49: 253-261. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.08.010MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Skóra L: Monotone iterative method for differential systems with impulses and anti-periodic boundary condition. Comment Math Prace Mat 2002,42(2):237-249.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Lloyd NG: Degree Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne; 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Xing and Fu; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement