Open Access

From Newton's Equation to Fractional Diffusion and Wave Equations

Advances in Difference Equations20112011:169421

https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/169421

Received: 12 December 2010

Accepted: 18 February 2011

Published: 10 March 2011

Abstract

Fractional calculus represents a natural instrument to model nonlocal (or long-range dependence) phenomena either in space or time. The processes that involve different space and time scales appear in a wide range of contexts, from physics and chemistry to biology and engineering. In many of these problems, the dynamics of the system can be formulated in terms of fractional differential equations which include the nonlocal effects either in space or time. We give a brief, nonexhaustive, panoramic view of the mathematical tools associated with fractional calculus as well as a description of some fields where either it is applied or could be potentially applied.

1. Introduction

Fractional calculus (see [1]) offers a very suggestive and stimulating scenario where we have the convergence of deep and fundamental mathematical questions, development of appropriate numerical algorithms, as well as the applications to modelizations in different frameworks. An illustration of the physical applications of fractional calculus is the recent following books and special issues on applications on nanotechnology and other important topics [26], among many others.

From a mathematical point of view, the modelization of the long-range dependence is associated with integrodifferential equations in a broad sense. On the other hand, in many cases such integrodifferential equations can be understood as fractional differential equations, and they can be studied in the fractional calculus framework.

Up to 1994, a very extensive review about the nonlinear nonlocal wave equations with applications in hydrodynamics, magnetohydrodynamics, and plasma can be found in the book of Naumkin and Shishmarëv [7]. The nonlocality in space is associated with the long-range interactions (many space scales) while the nonlocality in time is related to the effects with memory/delay (many time scales). The corresponding nonlocal systems are described by general integral equations. We have a large spectrum of scenarios where the integral equations occur [815]: potential theory, signal processing, problems in geophysics, problems in electricity and magnetism, hereditary phenomena in physics and biology, problems in population growth and industrial replacement, radiation problems, optimization, and automatic control systems, communication theory, stochastic problems, and mathematical economics and financial phenomena.

Professor Magin in his recent book, Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering [16] established clearly the underlying mathematical context of fractional calculus.

The purpose of this book is to explore the behavior of biological systems from the perspective of fractional calculus. Fractional calculus, integration and differentiation of an arbitrary or fractional order, provides new tools that expand the descriptive power of calculus beyond the familiar integer-order concepts of rates of change and area under a curve… Fractional calculus adds new functional relationships and new functions to the familiar family of exponentials and sinusoids that arise in the realm of ordinary linear differential equations. Among such functions that play an important role, we have the Euler Gamma function, the Euler Beta function, the Mittag-Leffler functions, the Wright and Fox functions, and so forth.

From a historical point of view, the origin of fractional calculus coincides with that of differential calculus. In a letter [17] dated September 9, 1695, and addressed to G. Leibniz, M. de L'Hopital raises the question of the possible meaning of if . The answer of Leibniz was: " will be equal to . This is an apparent paradox from which, one day, useful consequences will be drawn". Fractional calculus arises to give a meaning to the noninteger derivatives. This concept was also analyzed by E. Euler, J. Liouville, P. S. Laplace, or Fourier. The generalization of this framework indicates that it is more appropriate to talk of integration and differentiation of arbitrary order. The book by Samko et al. [1] reflects the situation of fractional calculus up to 1990 with a wide bibliography and many applications. Therefore we can think in the field of Fractional Calculus as an old topic, but, from 20 years ago, the real applications of the so-called fractional models in so many branches of applied sciences and engineering have increased in a dramatic way, so we can consider the topic of fractional differential equations and their applications as a emergent field.

A nonexhaustive list of works that support the mentioned modern development of fractional calculus and its applications are in [1825]. From our point of view, the monographic work by Metzler and Klafter in 2000 [26] could be considered as the last breakpoint in developing the field of the study of fractional differential equations and their applications. Some of the more important publications on the mentioned topic during last five years, among so many references, could be the following books in [2734].

There are different definitions of fractional derivatives and, as a consequence, of fractional integrals, since the fractional derivation is the inverse operation of the fractional integration. This a generalization of what happens in ordinary calculus with the standard integer derivatives and integrals according to the fundamental theorem of calculus. The different fractional derivatives coincide in the integer case, up to a constant in some cases. We have the fractional derivatives and integrals of Riemann-Liouville, Liouville, Caputo, and so forth, and their general feature is the nonlocal character since they depend on the values of the function in an interval. As an illustration, we have a derivative of order of the function :
(1.1)

where and . This definition requires the absolute integrability of the derivative of order .

The nonlocal character makes the fractional derivatives suitable for the modellization of systems with long-range interactions. On the other hand, the freedom in the definition of fractional derivatives allows us to incorporate different types of information. At the same time, the fractional derivatives with noninteger exponents stress which algebraic scale properties are relevant to the data analysis.

In this contribution, we present a standard approach to construct fractional differential equations from the basic equations of classical and quantum mechanics (Section 2). In Section 3, we analyze the possible bridges between fractional calculus and fractals while in Section 4, we consider the relation of fractional calculus with the modellization of relaxation processes.

2. Fractional Differential Equations

Following the models of classical mechanics ([35]) and quantum mechanics ([36]), let us consider a possible standard path among the basic equations of physics that would allow us to interpret, in a more wide context, the level offractionalization of the basic differential equations by analyzing the associated dynamics and solutions in the framework of the corresponding modellization [26, 27, 3739].

For the sake of simplicity, let us consider systems in one space dimension. Newton's equation for a particle of mass moving in a one-dimensional force field , being the displacement, is
(2.1)
Let us consider now a discrete system, formed by infinite point-like masses, , spaced a distance , and connected by strings of the same constant . If we name the displacement of the particle from the equilibrium, the equation of motion is given by
(2.2)
This equation is written in such a way as to interpret appropriately the continuous limit of the system when :
(2.3)
Thus, we have the equation
(2.4)
where . With this mechanical approach, we get the wave equation which appears in many contexts according to the different meanings of and . If we assume a damping mechanism either in the discrete system or in the continuous limit, we have the equation
(2.5)
When the damping term, , dominates over the inertial one, , we have the standard diffusion equation
(2.6)
Other basic equations are obtained by considering extra linear terms. This is the case of the Klein-Gordon equation:
(2.7)
and the Telegraph equation:
(2.8)
All this can be summarized in the following equation, where we also include Dirac's equation to be discussed in the following paragraphs.
(2.9)
According to the previous statements, we have a set of very important features.
  1. (i)
    Fractional calculus provides a natural interpolation between different equations. For instance, we have the fractional interpolation between the wave equation (hyperbolic) and the diffusion equation (parabolic). Thus, we have the family of fractional equations
    (2.10)

    When we have the wave equation, while we have the diffusion equation for . The study of such possible interpolations has not been fully exploited yet.

     
  2. (ii)

    The different equations above can be fractionalized by replacing the integer derivatives either in space or time by fractional derivatives. The range of fractional equations is very wide at the same time that the exploration of the associated dynamics and solutions is a task to be fulfilled. On the other hand, it is an open issue to analyze the relation of the different fractionalizations at the discrete and the continuous levels.

     
  3. (iii)

    The standard diffusion equation. The diffusion equation (2.6) appears in very different physical contexts which leads to a better understanding and interpretation of the generalized diffusion equations. Such different applications allow a richer phenomenology to understand the possible meaning of the different possible fractionalizations. As an example, the equation is obtained by combining the following laws with the associated continuity equation.

     
  4. (iv)
    Darcy's law
    (2.11)

    where is the flux of groundwater, is the medium property: hydraulic conductivity, and is the potential related to the head.

     
  5. (v)
    Fourier's law
    (2.12)

    where is the flux of heat, is the medium property: thermal conductivity and is the potential related to the temperature.

     
  6. (vi)
    Fick's law
    (2.13)

    where is the flux of solute, is the medium property: diffusion coefficient and is the potential related to the concentration.

     
  7. (vii)
    Ohm's law
    (2.14)

    where is the flux of charge (electrical current), is the medium property: electrical conductivity, and is the potential related to the voltage.

     
  8. (viii)
    The fractional Dirac equation (see [11, 4043]). The free Dirac equation ([36]) can be considered as the square root of the Klein-Gordon equation. This is also true for the case of in (2.7) which corresponds to the wave equation. More precisely in this last case, we have Figure 1: where and are matrices satisfying the indicated algebra. The function is scalar while is a multicomponent function with, at least, two scalar space-time components.
    (2.15)
     
In the context of Figure 1, we can understand the following equation:
(2.16)

as the square root of the standard diffusion equation (2.6). It is another way to view the possible interpolations between the hyperbolic operator of the wave equation and the parabolic one of the classical diffusion equation. Every scalar component of also satisfies the diffusion equation above. Such solutions can be interpreted as probability distributions with internal structure associated to internal degrees of freedom of the system. We could name them diffunors in analogy with the spinors of quantum mechanics.

Figure 1

Fractional diffusion equation and fractional Dirac-type equation.

According to the possible representations of the Pauli algebra for and , we have either an uncoupled system or a coupled system of equations. An example of the first case is the representation
(2.17)

The transition between the two limit behaviours indicated in the diagram is not well understood and it deserves a deep analysis. As an illustration of the possible rich phenomenology associated to the interpolating fractional wave and Dirac equations is their behaviour with respect the discrete symmetries: time and space inversion (see [43]).

This analysis of the fractional wave, diffusion, and Dirac equations, fits in the general context of establish bridges between fractional calculus and the classical and quantum mechanics [44, 45]. This is also the approach of the works of Rabei and coworkers (see [46]).

3. Fractional Calculus and Fractals

Fractals and fractional calculus generate parameters of intermediate order: arbitrary dimensions as well as arbitrary order of integration and differentiation [47, 48]. Let us consider the basic aspects associated with both conceptual blocks, and we will remark on possible bridges between them to be explored.
  1. (1)

    Fractals show self-similar structures, being the same structure at all scale levels. Such structures are introduced by using the concept of a reference structure and repeating itself over many scales, telescoping both downward and upward in scale. In general, the fractals structures are defined by an iterative process instead of an explicit mathematical formula. A simple case is the Cantor set which is a limiting set of points which results from discarding the middle third of each line segment in going from generation to generation, and starting from a line segment of unit length. The fractal dimension D is a measure of the irregularity of the fractal structure, and, in the case of the Cantor set, the fractal dimension is .

    The fractal property can be either in space or in time. In the first case we have the fractal geometric structures as the Cantor set while in the temporal context we have the structures of sequence of data generated for a system over an interval of time. A special case is the Weierstrass function which is an example of a function continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere:
    (3.1)
    where , is an arbitrary phase and , being the fractal dimension of the self-similar structure defined by . The function can be interpreted as a superposition of harmonic terms: the first one with unit amplitude and unit frequency and the -order term with amplitude and frequency . The lack of differentiability of is related to the integer derivatives. On the other hand, it has been established that the fractional derivative (fractional integral) of the Weierstrass function is another fractal function with a greater (lesser) fractal dimension [49]. At the same time, it has been proved that the Weierstrass function is a solution of a fractional differential stochastic equation of motion. In particular, we have the following relations for the Weierstrass function.
    1. (i)
      The fractional Riemann-Liouville integral of order , with :
      (3.2)
       
    2. (ii)
      The fractional Riemann-Liouville derivative of order , with :
      (3.3)
       
    3. (iii)
      The relation between the fractal dimensions of the fractional derivative and integral of the Weierstrass function
      (3.4)
       
     
  2. (2)

    One of the possible experimental contexts to apply together with the concepts of fractals and fractional calculus is related to the propagation of waves [5052]. In the 19th Century, James Clerk Maxwell and Lord Rayleigh studied the interaction of electromagnetic waves with Euclidean regular structures (cylinders, spheres). On the other hand, there are either nonregular artificial structures or from nature that show many length scales and they are not suitable to be studied in the Euclidean context. This is the case of nonregular surfaces, disordered media, structures with specific properties of scattering, and so forth. In this context, the fundamental issue of special technological impact is the relation between the geometrical parameters (structure descriptors) and the physical quantities that characterize electromagnetically the system. For instance, a relevant information is the relation between the fractal dimension of the scattering surface and the scattered wave. Related to that, we have that a recent field of research has been to explore the possible links between the fractional calculus and the electromagnetic theory ([53]). The fractionalization of certain linear operators in electromagnetic theory has led to relevant solutions in radiation and scattering problems.

     
As a simple illustration, let us consider the propagation of a wave in fractal media. The geometrical optics cannot be applied and the eikonal equation is no longer valid since it applies for wave lengths dimension of any change in the media. This condition cannot be satisfied for fractal media because, in this case, there is no characteristic length of the system. We can consider the associated stationary eigenvalue problem that appears in two contexts: the wave equation in a fractal potential and the wave equation with fractal boundary conditions. In the last case, we have the general equation
(3.5)

where is a linear differential operator on with boundary conditions on a nondifferentiable surface but which admits the fractional derivative with . If we define , we have the problem with the boundary condition , being differentiable. Thus, with the help of the fractional derivative, we transformed the original boundary problem into another one more suitable to be studied.

4. Fractional Calculus and Relaxation Processes

In the study of the behavior of the materials under applied forces, we have two ideal relations between such forces and the resultant displacements in the material which are represented by linear differential equations.
  1. (i)
    Linear elastic behavior which is described by the Hooke's law (ideal solid):
    (4.1)

    where is Young's modulus, is the stress and is the strain of the corresponding mechanical model, that, in this case, is represented by a spring characterized by the constant .

     
  2. (ii)
    Ideal viscous fluid behavior which is described by Newton's fluid law (ideal fluid):
    (4.2)

    where is the viscosity coefficient, and, in this case, the phenomenological model is represented by a dashpot.

     
In general, the real materials exhibit characteristics which combine the behaviors of the ideal solids and liquids and are named viscoelastic materials. The basic models of such materials are based on combinations of springs and dashpots [2, 16, 54]. As an illustration, let us consider the combination of a spring and a dashpot in series. In this case, the stresses are equal for both structural parts while the strains add. This leads to the classical Maxwell model which is described by the following linear differential equation obtained from the above two equations:
(4.3)
where . If we consider the Laplace transform of the above equation, we obtain the relaxation modulus . Finally, the stress relaxation modulus for the Maxwell model is
(4.4)
which indicates that the Maxwell model shows an exponential stress decay, while different behaviors are observed in real materials. Fractional calculus allow us to introduce generalizations of the Maxwell model and the basic constitutive equation that leads to more general behaviors of the stress relaxation modulus.
  1. (i)
    The fractional constitutive equation
    (4.5)

    which is an interpolation between Hooke's law and Newton's law . This fractional relation can be realized physically through hierarchical arrangements and in the limit of an infinite number of springs and dashpots [2].

     
  2. (ii)
    The general fractional Maxwell equation offers a wide range of possible behaviors
    (4.6)

    the solutions are well analyzed in [2, 16] as well as in the references therein.

     
  3. (iii)
    In order to consider other generalizations and approaches for possible different applications, we can interpret the relaxation process either as an initial value problem or a memory problem.
    1. (a)
      Initial Value Problem. The relaxation (4.4) can be interpreted as the solution of the initial value problem
      (4.7)
      with solution . From (4.7), we can write as starting point for the fractional generalization:
      (4.8)
      from which, we formally get the fractional generalization
      (4.9)
       
    2. (b)

      Memory Problem. Another natural generalization of (4.7) is

      (4.10)
       
     

If , we recover the exponential behavior of the Maxwell model (4.4). If we have constant memory, , we have the periodic behavior: . Finally, if with , the equation (4.10) can be written as a fractional derivative and the solution can be expressed in terms of the Fox functions.

One possible application field for fractional calculus would be the modellization of the shape memory alloys (SMA). These are basically materials that change shape when energy is applied or extracted from them. They exhibit hardness and elasticity properties that change radically at distinct temperatures [55]. There is a high complexity in the relation between the microscopic and macroscopic behaviors. There are no reliable constitutive models, although some have been studied by Tanaka [56], Liang and Rogers [57], and Brinson [58]. The key feature of these materials, as the name indicates, is that their dynamics is memory dependent. Thus, the possible realistic models should include the nonlocal effects in time through integrodifferential equations and, possibly, fractional differential equations.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This paper has been partially supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain under Grant AYA2009-14212-C05-05 and by FCT and POCI 2010 (Project MAT/58321/2004) with participation of FEDER.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Informática, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

References

  1. Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science, Yverdon, Switzerland; 1993:xxxvi+976.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Hilfer R (Ed): Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA; 2000:viii+463.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Hilfer R, Metzler R, Blumen A, Klafter J (Eds): Strange kinetics In Chemical Physics 2002,284(1):1-541. 10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00801-7Google Scholar
  4. Baleanu D, Güvenç ZB, Tenreiro Machad JA: New Trends in Nanotechnology and Fractional Calculus Applications. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2010:xii+531.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Ortigueira M, Tenreiro-Machado JA, Trujillo JJ, Vinagre B (Eds): Advances in fractional signals and systems In Journal of Signal Processing 2011,91(3):349-606. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.08.002Google Scholar
  6. Tenreiro-Machado JA, Luo A (Eds): Discontinuous and fractional dynamical systems In Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 2008,3(2):1-125.Google Scholar
  7. Naumkin PI, Shishmarëv IA: Nonlinear Nonlocal Equations in the Theory of Waves, Translations of Mathematical Monographs. Volume 133. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1994:x+289.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Lonseth AT: Sources and applications of integral equations. SIAM Review 1977,19(2):241-278. 10.1137/1019039MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheney M, Borden B: Fundamentals of Radar Imaging, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Volume 79. SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA; 2009:xxiv+140.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Baillie RT, King ML (Eds): Fractional differencing and long memory processes In Journal of Econometrics 1996,73(1):1-324. 10.1016/0304-4076(95)01731-3Google Scholar
  11. Vázquez L: A fruitful interplay: from nonlocality to fractional calculus. In Nonlinear Waves: Classical and Quantum Aspects. Edited by: Abdullaev FKh, Konotop VV. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, NY, USA; 2004:129-133.Google Scholar
  12. Vázquez L, Usero D: Nonlocal equations and fractional models. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (España) 2005,99(2):203-223.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Vázquez L, Evans WAB, Rickayzen G: Numerical investigation of a non-local sine-Gordon model. Physics Letters A 1994,189(6):454-459. 10.1016/0375-9601(94)91209-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Alfimov GL, Usero D, Vázquez L:On complex singularities of solutions of the equation . Journal of Physics A 2000,33(38):6707-6720. 10.1088/0305-4470/33/38/305MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Pipiras V, Taqqu MS: Fractional calculus and its connections to fractional Brownian motion. In Theory and Applications of Long-Range Dependence. Edited by: Doukhan P, Oppenheim G, Taqqu MS. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2003:165-201.Google Scholar
  16. Magin RL: Fractional Calculus and Bioengineering. Begell House, New York, NY, USA; 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Leibniz GW: Oeuvres Mathematiques de Leibniz. Correpondence de leibniz avec Huygens, van Zulichem et le Marquis de L'Hospital Part 1. Volume 2. Libr. de A. Franck, Paris, France; 1853.Google Scholar
  18. Oldham KB, Spanier J: The Fractional Calculus, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 11. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1974:xiii+234.Google Scholar
  19. Miller KS, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1993:xvi+366.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Oustaloup A: La Drivation Non Entiere. Theorie, Synthese et Applications. Hermes Science, Stanmore, UK; 1995.Google Scholar
  21. Kiryakova V: Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series. Volume 301. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, UK; 1994:x+388.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 198. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA; 1999:xxiv+340.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubin B: Fractional Integrals and Potentials, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Volume 82. Longman, Harlow, UK; 1996:xiv+409.Google Scholar
  24. Bonilla B, Kilbas AA, Trujillo JJ: Cálculo Fraccionario y Ecuaciones Diferenciales Fraccionarias. Serv. de Publicaciones de la UNED, Madrid, Spain; 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Zaslavsky GM: Chaos, fractional kinetics, and anomalous transport. Physics Reports 2002,371(6):461-580. 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00331-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Metzler R, Klafter J: The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Physics Reports 2000,339(1):77.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Volume 204. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2006:xvi+523.Google Scholar
  28. Zaslavsky GM: Hamiltonian Chaos and Fractional Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; 2008:xiv+421.MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Uchaikin VV: Method of Fractional Derivatives. Artishok-Press, Ulyanovsk, Russia; 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Lakshmikantham V, Leela S, Vasundhara-Devi J: Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems. Cambridge Scientific Publishers, Cambridge, UK; 2009.MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Mainardi F: Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Mathematical Models. Imperial College Press, London, UK; 2010:xx+347.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Caponetto R, Dongola G, Fortuna L, Petras I: Fractional Order Systems: Modeling and Control Applications. World Scientific, Singapure; 2010.Google Scholar
  33. Tarasov VE: Fractional Dynamics in Physics. Higher Education Press and Springer, Berlin, Geramny; 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Klafter J, Lim SC, Metzler R (Eds): Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media. World Scientific, Singapore; 2011.Google Scholar
  35. Goldstein H: Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA; 1951:xii+399.Google Scholar
  36. Dirac PAM: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; 1958.MATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokolov IM, Klafter J, Blumen A: Fractional kinetics. Physics Today 2002,55(11):48-54. 10.1063/1.1535007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiménez S, Pascual P, Aguierre C, Vázquez L: A panoramic view of some perturbed nonlinear wave equations. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 2004,14(1):1-40. 10.1142/S0218127404009211MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Mendes RV, Vázquez L: The dynamical nature of a backlash system with and without fluid friction. Nonlinear Dynamics 2007,47(4):363-366. 10.1007/s11071-006-9035-yView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Vázquez L: Fractional diffusion equations with internal degrees of freedom. Journal of Computational Mathematics 2003,21(4):491-494.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Vázquez L, Vilela Mendes R: Fractionally coupled solutions of the diffusion equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2003,141(1):125-130. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00326-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Kilbas AA, Pierantozzi T, Trujillo JJ, Vázquez L: On the solution of fractional evolution equations. Journal of Physics A 2004,37(9):3271-3283. 10.1088/0305-4470/37/9/015MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierantozzi T, Vázquez L: An interpolation between the wave and diffusion equations through the fractional evolution equations Dirac like. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2005,46(11):113512, 12.View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Vázquez L: Una panorámica del Cálculo Fraccionario y sus aplicaciones. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 2004,98(1):17-26.Google Scholar
  45. Turchetti G, Usero D, Vázquez L: Hamiltonian systems with fractional time derivative. Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences 2002,18(1):31-44.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Rabei EM, Nawafleh KI, Hijjawi RS, Muslih SI, Baleanu D: The Hamilton formalism with fractional derivatives. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,327(2):891-897. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.04.076MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. West BJ, Bologna M, Grigolini P: Physics of Fractal Operators. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2003:x+354.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Mandelbrot BB: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif, USA; 1982:v+460.Google Scholar
  49. Rocco A, West BJ: Fractional calculus and the evolution of fractal phenomena. Physica A 1999,265(3):535-546. 10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00550-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Berry MV: Difractals. Journal of Physics A 1979, 12: 781-797. 10.1088/0305-4470/12/6/008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Jaggard DL: On fractal electrodymanics. In Recent Advances in Electromagnetic Theory. Edited by: Kritikos HN, Jaggard DL. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1990:183-224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Konotop VV, Fei Z, Vázquez L: Wave interaction with a fractal layer. Physical Review E 1993,48(5):4044-4048. 10.1103/PhysRevE.48.4044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Engheta N: Fractional paradigm in electromagnetic theory. In Frontiers in Electromagnetism. Edited by: Werner DH, Mittra R. IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA; 2000:523-552.Google Scholar
  54. Vázquez L, Velasco Cebrián MP: Aplicación del Cálculo Fraccionario a los procesos de relajación. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 2009, 23: 105-115.Google Scholar
  55. Sun QP, Hwang KC: Micromechanics modelling for the constitutive behavior of polycrystalline shape memory alloys-II. Study of the individual phenomena. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1993,41(1):19-33. 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90061-JView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Tanaka K: A thermo-mechanical sketch of shape memory effect: one-dimensional tensile behavior. Res Mechanica 1986,18(3):251-263.Google Scholar
  57. Liang C, Rogers CA: One-dimensional thermo-mechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1990,1(2):207-218. 10.1177/1045389X9000100205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Brinson LC: One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1993,4(2):229-242. 10.1177/1045389X9300400213View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Luis Vázquez. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.