- Research Article
- Open Access
Asymptotical Convergence of the Solutions of a Linear Differential Equation with Delays
© Josef Diblík et al. 2010
- Received: 1 January 2010
- Accepted: 23 April 2010
- Published: 30 May 2010
The asymptotic behavior of the solutions of the first-order differential equation containing delays is studied with , , , . The attention is focused on an analysis of the asymptotical convergence of solutions. A criterion for the asymptotical convergence of all solutions, characterized by the existence of a strictly increasing bounded solution, is proved. Relationships with the previous results are discussed, too.
- Initial Function
- Integral Inequality
- Asymptotical Convergence
- Convergent Solution
- Nonnegative Constant
as . In (1.1) we assume , , functions where , , are continuous and such that on . Set . Throughout the paper the symbol " " denotes the right-hand derivative. Similarly, if necessary, the value of a function at a point of is understood as the value of the corresponding limit from the right.
We call a solution of (1.1) asymptotically convergent if it has a finite limit . The main results concern the asymptotical convergence of all solutions of (1.1). Besides, the proof of the results is based on the comparison of solutions of (1.1) with solutions of an auxiliary inequality which formally copies (1.1). At first, we prove that, under certain conditions, (1.1) has a strictly increasing asymptotically convergent solution. Then we extend this statement to all the solutions of (1.1). Moreover, in the general case, the asymptotical convergence of all solutions is characterized by the existence of a strictly increasing bounded solution.
The problem concerning the asymptotical convergence of solutions of delayed differential equations (or delayed difference equation, etc.) is a classical one. But the problem of the asymptotic convergence or divergence of solutions of delayed equations receives permanent attention. Let us mention at least investigations [1–18]. Comparing the known investigations with the results presented we conclude that our results give more sharp sufficient conditions.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 an auxiliary inequality is studied and the relationship of its solutions with solutions of (1.1) is derived. The existence of a strictly increasing and convergent solution of (1.1) is established in Section 3. Section 4 contains results concerning the asymptotical convergence of all the solutions of (1.1). The related previous results are discussed in Section 5.
plays an important role in the analysis of (1.1). Let and be given. The function is said to be a solution of (2.1) on if is continuous on , continuously differentiable on , and satisfies inequality (2.1) for . If , we call the solution of (2.1) asymptotically convergent if it has a finite limit .
2.1. Relationship between the Solutions of Inequality (2.1) and Equation (1.1)
In this part, we will derive some properties of the solutions of type (2.1) inequalities and compare the solutions of (1.1) with those of inequality (2.1).
Let be strictly increasing (nondecreasing, strictly decreasing, nonincreasing) on . Then the corresponding solution of (1.1) with is strictly increasing (nondecreasing, strictly decreasing, nonincreasing) on , respectively. If is strictly increasing (nondecreasing) and is a solution of (2.1) with , , then is strictly increasing (nondecreasing) on .
is such a solution.
2.2. A Solution of Inequality (2.1)
It is easy to get a solution of inequality (2.1) in an exponential form. We will indicate this form in the following lemma. This auxiliary result will help us derive concrete sufficient conditions for the existence of strictly increasing and convergent solution of (1.1).
In this part we indicate sufficient conditions for the existence of a convergent solution of (1.1). First, let us introduce two obvious statements concerning asymptotical convergence. From Theorem 2.2 and Lemma 2.1, we immediately get the following.
From Lemma 2.1, Theorem 2.2, and Lemma 2.4, we get the following.
as , we conclude that (3.14) holds and, consequently, the integral inequality (2.7) has a solution for every sufficiently large . Lemma 2.4 holds. We finalize the proof by noticing that the statement of the theorem directly follows from Theorem 3.1.
Assuming that functions , , can be estimated by suitable functions, we will prove that (1.1) has an asymptotically convergent solution. This yields two interesting corollaries directly following from inequality (3.3) in Theorem 3.3.
Thus, the inequality (3.3) in Theorem 3.3 holds.
In this part we prove results concerning the asymptotical convergence of all the solutions of (1.1). First, we use inequality (3.3) to establish conditions for the asymptotical convergence of all the solutions.
First we prove that every solution defined by a monotone initial function is asymptotically convergent. We will assume that a monotone initial function is given. For the definiteness, let be strictly increasing or nondecreasing (the strictly decreasing or nonincreasing case can be dealt with in much the same way). By Lemma 2.1, the solution is monotone (either strictly increasing or nondecreasing) on . In what follows, we will prove that is asymptotically convergent.
Summarizing the previous part, we state that every monotone solution is asymptotically convergent. It remains to consider a class of all nonmonotone initial functions. For the behavior of a solution , generated by a nonmonotone initial function there are two possibilities: either is eventually monotone and, consequently, asymptotically convergent, or is eventually nonmonotone.
We will also use the known fact that every absolutely continuous function can be decomposed into the difference of two strictly increasing absolutely continuous functions [19, page 315]. Assuming that an initial (nonmonotone) function is absolutely continuous on interval , we can decompose it on the interval into the difference of two strictly increasing absolutely continuous functions , . In accordance with the previous part of the proof, every function , defines a strictly increasing convergent solution . Now it becomes clear that the solution is asymptotically convergent. To complete the proof, it remains to prove that, without loss of generality, we can restrict the set of all initial functions to the set of absolutely continuous initial functions. To this end, we again consider the solution defined by and, if necessary, always without loss of generality, we can replace by and by since the solution has a finite derivative the interval . Finally, we remark that any function satisfying the Lipschitz condition on an interval is absolutely continuous in it [19, page 313].
Tracing the proof of Theorem 4.1, we can see that the inequality (3.3) was used only as "input" information stating that, in accordance with Theorem 3.3, there exists a strictly increasing and asymptotically convergent solution of (1.1) on . If the existence of a strictly monotone and asymptotically convergent solution is assumed instead of (3.3), we obtain the following
Moreover, combining the results formulated in Theorems 2.2, 3.1 and 4.2, we obtain the following
is treated, for example, in [2, 4, 10, 11]. The following theorem (see [11, Theorems , , and ]) gives corresponding results related to (5.2). Its first part gives sufficient conditions for the existence of a strictly increasing and unbounded solution of (5.2) whereas the second part provides sufficient conditions for the asymptotical convergence of all its solutions.
and one would expect a pair of opposite inequalities stronger than (5.3) and (5.4). Can one of the inequalities (5.3) or (5.4) be improved? The following example shows that probably (5.3) can be improved because (5.4) provides a best possible criterion.
This research was supported by the Grant no. 1/0090/09 of the Grant Agency of Slovak Republic (VEGA) and by the project APVV-0700-07 of Slovak Research and Development Agency.
- Arino O, Pituk M: Convergence in asymptotically autonomous functional-differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1999,237(1):376-392. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6489MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Arino O, Pituk M: More on linear differential systems with small delays. Journal of Differential Equations 2001,170(2):381-407. 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3824MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Atkinson FV, Haddock JR: Criteria for asymptotic constancy of solutions of functional-differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1983,91(2):410-423. 10.1016/0022-247X(83)90161-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bereketoğlu H, Pituk M: Asymptotic constancy for nonhomogeneous linear differential equations with unbounded delays. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A 2003,2003(supplement):100-107.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Čermák J: Asymptotic bounds for linear difference systems. Advances in Difference Equations 2010, 2010:-14.Google Scholar
- Čermák J: On matrix differential equations with several unbounded delays. European Journal of Applied Mathematics 2006,17(4):417-433. 10.1017/S0956792506006590MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Čermák J, Kundrát P: Linear differential equations with unbounded delays and a forcing term. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2004, (4):337-345.Google Scholar
- Diblík J: Asymptotic convergence criteria of solutions of delayed functional differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2002,274(1):349-373. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00311-6MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Diblík J:Asymptotic representation of solutions of equation . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1998,217(1):200-215. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5709MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Diblík J, Růžičková M:Exponential solutions of equation . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2004,294(1):273-287. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.036MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Diblík J, Růžičková M:Convergence of the solutions of the equation in the critical case. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,331(2):1361-1370. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.10.001MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Dorociaková B, Olach R: Existence of positive solutions of delay differential equations. Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications 2009, 43: 63-70.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Györi I, Horvath L: Asymptotic constancy in linear difference equations: limit formulae and sharp conditions. Advances in Difference Equations 2010, 2010:-20.Google Scholar
- Györi I, Pituk M: Comparison theorems and asymptotic equilibrium for delay differential and difference equations. Dynamic Systems and Applications 1996,5(2):277-302.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Hanuštiaková L, Olach R: Nonoscillatory bounded solutions of neutral differential systems. Nonlinear Analysis 2008,68(7):1816-1824. 10.1016/j.na.2007.01.014MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Krisztin T: A note on the convergence of the solutions of a linear functional-differential equation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1990,145(1):17-25. 10.1016/0022-247X(90)90427-HMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Murakami K: Asymptotic constancy for systems of delay differential equations. Nonlinear Analysis 1997,30(7):4595-4606. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00316-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Šmarda Z: Singular cauchy initial value problem for certain classes of integro-differential equations. Advances in Difference Equations 2010, 2010:-13.Google Scholar
- Vulich BZ: Short Course of Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, An Introduction to the Integral Theory. 2nd edition. Nauka, Moscow, Russia; 1973.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.