 Research Article
 Open Access
Existence Theorems for FirstOrder Equations on Time Scales with Carathéodory Functions
 Hugues Gilbert^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/650827
© Hugues Gilbert. 2010
 Received: 14 June 2010
 Accepted: 3 December 2010
 Published: 15 December 2010
Abstract
This paper concerns the existence of solutions for two kinds of systems of firstorder equations on time scales. Existence results for these problems are obtained with new notions of solution tube adapted to these systems. We consider the general case where the right member of the system is Carathéodory and, hence, not necessarily continuous.
Keywords
 Existence Result
 Existence Theorem
 Extremal Solution
 Nonnegative Constant
 Lebesgue Integration
1. Introduction
In the literature, this kind of problem was mainly treated for . The existence of extremal solutions was established in [1, 2]. Moreover, some existence results in the particular case where the time scale is a discrete set (difference equation) were obtained with the lower and upper solution method as in [3, 4]. In this paper, we introduce a new notion which generalizes to systems of firstorder equations on time scales the notions of lower and upper solutions. This notion called solution tube for system (1.1) (resp., (1.2)) will be useful to get a new existence result for (1.1) (resp., (1.2)). Our notion of solution tube is in the spirit of the notion of solution tube for systems of firstorder differential equations introduced in [5]. Our notion is new even in the case of systems of firstorder difference equations. In this case, we generalize to the systems a result of [3] for equation (1.2).
Some papers treat the existence of solutions to systems of firstorder equations on time scales. Existence results are obtained in [6, 7] under hypothesis different from ours. However, some particular cases obtained in [7] are corollaries of our existence result for problem (1.1). Also, our existence results treat the case where the right members in (1.1) and (1.2) are Carathéodory functions which are more general than continuous functions used for systems studied in [6, 7]. Let us mention that existence of extremal solutions for infinite systems of firstorder equations of time scale with Carathéodory functions is established in [8].
This paper is organized as follows. The third section presents an existence result for the problem (1.1), and in the last section, we obtain an existence theorem for the problem (1.2). We start with some notations, definitions, and results on time scales equations which are used throughout this paper.
2. Preliminaries and Notations
In this section, we establish notations, definitions, and results on equations on time scales which are used throughout this paper. The reader may consult [9–11] and the references therein to find the proofs and to get a complete introduction to this subject.
Let be a time scale, which is a closed nonempty subset of . For , we define the forward jump operator (resp., the backward jump operator ) by (resp., by ). We suppose that if is the maximum of and that if is the minimum of . We say that is rightscattered (resp., leftscattered) if (resp., if ). We say that is isolated if it is rightscattered and leftscattered. Also, if and , we say that is rightdense. If and , we say that is left dense. Points that are right dense and left dense are called dense. The graininess function is defined by .
If is bounded, then where .
Definition 2.1.
for every . We call the derivative of at . If is differentiable at for every , then is called the derivative of on .
Theorem 2.2.
 (i)
If is differentiable at , then is continuous at .
 (ii)
 (iii)
If is right dense, then is differentiable at if and only if exists in . In this case, .
 (iv)
If is differentiable at , then .
Theorem 2.3.
 (i)
is differentiable at and ,
 (ii)
is differentiable at for every and ,
 (iii)
is differentiable at and ,
 (iv)
The next result is an adaptation of Theorem 1.87 in [10].
Theorem 2.4.
Let be an open set of and a rightdense point. If is differentiable at and if is differentiable at , then is differentiable at and .
Example 2.5.
Assume is  differentiable at . We know that is differentiable. If , by the previous theorem, we have .
Definition 2.6.
A function is called continuous provided it is continuous at rightdense points in and its leftsided limits exist (finite) at leftdense points in . The set of continuous functions is denoted by . The set of functions that are differentiable and whose derivative is continuous is denoted by .
Definition 2.7.
The Lebesgue measure on , denoted by , is the restriction of to . We get a complete measurable space with .
With this definition of complete measurable space for a bounded time scale , we can define the notions of measurability and integrability for functions following the same ideas of the theory of Lebesgue integral. We omit here these definitions that an interested reader can find in [12]. We only present definitions and results which will be useful for this paper.
Definition 2.8.
for each of its components .
Proposition 2.9.
Many results of integration theory are established for measurable functions where is a complete measurable space. These results are in particular true for the measurable space . We recall two results of the theory of integration adapted to our situation.
Theorem 2.10 (Lebesguedominated convergence Theorem).
Let be a sequence of functions in . If there exists a function such that a.e. and if there exists a function such that a.e. and for every , then in .
Theorem 2.11.
The set is a Banach space endowed with the norm .
The following results were obtained in [12] where a useful relation between the measure on (resp., integral on ) and the Lebesgue measure ( ) on (resp., Lebesgue integral on ) is established. To establish these results, the authors of [12] prove that the set of rightscattered points of is at most countable. Then, there are a set of index and a set such that .
Proposition 2.12.
 (i)
 (ii)
if and only if and A has no rightscattered points. Here, .
Theorem 2.13.
Definition 2.14.
A function is said to be absolutely continuous on if for every , there exists a such that if with is a finite pairwise disjoint family of subintervals of satisfying , then .
The three following results were obtained in [13].
Lemma 2.15.
If is differentiable at , then is differentiable at and .
Theorem 2.16.
Consider a function and its extension . Then, is absolutely continuous on if and only if is absolutely continuous on .
Theorem 2.17.
We also recall the Banach Lemma.
Lemma 2.18.
Let be a Banach space and an absolutely continuous function, then the measure of the set and is zero.
Using the previous results, we now prove two propositions that will be used later.
Proposition 2.19.
Then, almost everywhere on .
Proof.
by Theorem 2.2(ii). Then, is differentiable at . By Proposition 2.12(ii), and, then, the proposition is proved.
Proposition 2.20.
Let be an absolutely continuous function, then the measure of the set and is zero.
Proof.
It suffices to consider the extension of on and successively apply Theorem 2.16, Lemmas 2.18, 2.15, and the Proposition 2.12(ii).
We recall a notion of Sobolev's space of functions defined on a bounded time scale where . The definition and the result are from [14].
Definition 2.21.
We say that a function is in the set if each of its components are in .
Theorem 2.22.
Suppose that and that (2.22) holds for a function . Then, there exists a unique function absolutely continuous such that almost everywhere on , one has and . Moreover, if is continuous on , then there exists a unique function such that almost everywhere on and such that on .
By the previous theorem, we can conclude that is also continuous.
Remark 2.23.
If , then its components are in . By Theorems 2.22 and 2.17, is  differentiable  a.e. on . From Example 2.5, we obtain  a.e. on .
We prove two maximum principles that will be useful to get a priori bounds for solutions of systems considered in this paper.
Lemma 2.24.
 (i)
,
 (ii)
,
then , for every .
Proof.
by hypothesis and by Theorem 2.17. Hence, we get a contradiction. The case is impossible if hypothesis (i) holds and if , we must have . If we take , by using previous steps of this proof, one can check that and, then, the lemma is proved.
Lemma 2.25.
Let be a function such that a.e. on if , then , for every .
Proof.
by Theorem 2.17, which contradicts the fact that is a maximum. If , then by hypothesis, we must have . Thus, we can take , and by using the previous steps of this proof, one can check that . Then, the lemma is proved.
Definition 2.26.
As direct consequences of Proposition 2.19 and Theorem 2.3, we get the following results.
Proposition 2.27.
Proposition 2.28.
Proposition 2.29.
We now define a notion of Carathéodory functions on a compact time scale.
Definition 2.30.

(Ci)The map is measurable for every .

(Cii)The map is continuous a.e. .

(Ciii)For every , there exists a function such that a.e. and for every such that .
3. Existence Theorem for the Problem (1.1)
In this section, we establish an existence result for the problem (1.1). A solution of this problem will be a function satisfying (1.1). Let us recall that is compact and . We introduce the notion of solution tube for the problem (1.1).
Definition 3.1.
 (i)
a.e. and for every such that ,
 (ii)
a.e. such that ,
 (iii)
for every such that ,
 (iv)
If (BC) denotes (1.3), ; if (BC) denotes (1.4), then .
If is a real interval , our definition of solution tube is equivalent to the notion of solution tube introduced in [5].
Proposition 3.2.
If is a solution tube of (1.1), (1.3), then is compact.
Proof.
We first observe that from Definitions 2.30 and 3.1, there exists a function such that a.e. for every .
where .
We can easily check that for every and, then, by (Cii) of Definition 2.30, a.e. . Using also the fact that a.e. , we deduce that in by Theorem 2.10. This prove the continuity of .
By an analogous version of the ArzelàAscoli Theorem adapted to our context, is relatively compact. Hence, is compact.
The following result can be proved as the previous one.
Proposition 3.3.
If is a solution tube of (1.1), (1.4), then the operator is compact.
Now, we can obtain the main theorem of this section.
Theorem 3.4.
If is a solution tube of (1.1), then the problem (1.1) has a solution .
Proof.
By Proposition 3.2 (resp., Proposition 3.3), (resp., ) is compact. It has a fixed point by the Schauder fixedpoint Theorem. Proposition 2.27 (resp., Proposition 2.28) implies that this fixed point is a solution for the problem (3.2). Then, it suffices to show that for every solution of (3.2), .
This last equality follows from Definition 3.1(iii) and Proposition 2.20.
If we set , then almost everywhere on . Moreover, since is a solution tube of (1.1) and satisfies (1.3) (resp., satisfies (1.4)), then (resp., ). Lemma 2.24 implies that . Therefore, and, hence, the theorem is proved.
Existence theorems are obtained in [7] for the problem (1.1), (1.3) when is continuous by using a hypothesis different of ours. When is bounded, we can directly use the Schauder fixedpoint Theorem to deduce the existence of a solution to (1.1), (1.3). We now show that in the case where is unbounded, Theorems 4.7 and 4.8 of [7] become corollaries of our existence theorem.
Corollary 3.5.
for every and every , then the problem (1.1), (1.3) has at least one solution.
Proof.
for every and every . Then, if we take , we get a solution tube for our problem and by Theorem 3.4, the problem has a solution such that for every .
Corollary 3.6.
for every and every , then the problem (1.1), (1.3) has at least one solution.
4. Existence Theorem for the Problem (1.2)
In this section, we establish an existence result for the problem (1.2). A solution of this problem will be a function for which (1.2) is satisfied. As before, is compact and . We introduce the notion of solution tube for the problem (1.2). Conditions of this definition are slightly different than conditions in Definition 3.1.
Definition 4.1.
 (i)
a.e. and for every such that ,
 (ii)
and , a.e. such that ,
 (iii)
.
where is defined in (3.3).
The following result can be proved as Proposition 3.2.
Proposition 4.2.
If is a solution tube of (1.2), then the operator is compact.
Here is the main existence theorem for problem (1.2).
Theorem 4.3.
If is a solution tube of (1.2), then the problem (1.2) has a solution .
Proof.
By Proposition 4.2, is compact. Then, by the Schauder fixedpoint Theorem, has a fixed point which is a solution of (4.1) by Proposition 2.29. It suffices to show that for every solution of (4.1), .
If we set , then almost everywhere on . Moreover, since is a solution tube of (1.2) and satisfies (1.4), . Lemma 2.25 implies that . So, and the theorem is proved.
Let us observe that the following results obtained in [6] and [15], respectively, are different from ours.
Theorem 4.4.
then the problem (1.2) has a solution.
Theorem 4.5.
for every , then the difference equation (1.2) has one solution.
Observe that Theorem 4.3 is valid for every arbitrary time scale . Here is an example where (4.7) and (4.9) are not satisfied, but where Theorem 4.3 can be applied to deduce the existence of a solution.
Example 4.6.
where are real positive constants such that and where is a continuous function such that for every .
for every .
for every .
for every , where , , , and . Taking the limit as , we get a contradiction. Similarly, if , it can be shown that (4.9) is not satisfied. On the other hand, it is easy to verify that is a solution tube of (4.10). By Theorem 4.3, this problem has a solution such that for every .
where .
Definition 4.7.
 (i)
for every , (resp., ),
 (ii)
(resp., ).
Remark that if are, respectively, lower and upper solutions of (4.14) such that for every , then is a solution tube for this problem. Conversely, if is a solution tube of (4.14), then and are, respectively, lower and upper solution for the same problem if, in addition, condition (ii) of Definition 4.7 is satisfied. Then, Theorem 5 of [3] becomes a corollary of Theorem 4.3.
Corollary 4.8.
If are, respectively, lower and upper solutions of (4.14) such that for every , then this equation has a solution such that for every .
Declarations
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank Professor Marlene Frigon for useful discussion and comments and the FQRNT for financial support.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 OteroEspinar V, Vivero DR: Existence of extremal solutions by approximation to a firstorder initial dynamic equation with Carathéodory's conditions and discontinuous nonlinearities. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(12):12251241. 10.1080/10236190600949808MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 OteroEspinar V, Vivero DR: The existence and approximation of extremal solutions to several firstorder discontinuous dynamic equations with nonlinear boundary value conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,68(7):20272037. 10.1016/j.na.2007.01.030MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bereanu C, Mawhin J: Existence and multiplicity results for periodic solutions of nonlinear difference equations. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(7):677695. 10.1080/10236190600654689MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Franco D, O'Regan D, Perán J: Upper and lower solution theory for first and second order difference equations. Dynamic Systems and Applications 2004,13(2):273282.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Mirandette B: Résultats d'Existence pour des Systèmes d'Équations Différentielles du Premier Ordre avec TubeSolution. Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; 1996.Google Scholar
 Dai Q, Tisdell CC: Existence of solutions to firstorder dynamic boundary value problems. International Journal of Difference Equations 2006,1(1):117.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Tisdell CC, Zaidi A: Basic qualitative and quantitative results for solutions to nonlinear, dynamic equations on time scales with an application to economic modelling. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,68(11):35043524. 10.1016/j.na.2007.03.043MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 OteroEspinar V, Vivero DR: Existence and approximation of extremal solutions to firstorder infinite systems of functional dynamic equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,339(1):590597. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.031MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bohner M, Peterson A: Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2003:xii+348.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Bohner M, Peterson A: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001:x+358.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Hilger S: Analysis on measure chains—a unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus. Results in Mathematics. Resultate der Mathematik 1990,18(12):1856.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Cabada A, Vivero DR:Expression of the Lebesgue integral on time scales as a usual Lebesgue integral: application to the calculus of antiderivatives. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2006,43(12):194207. 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.09.028MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Cabada A, Vivero DR: Criterions for absolute continuity on time scales. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2005,11(11):10131028. 10.1080/10236190500272830MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Agarwal RP, OteroEspinar V, Perera K, Vivero DR: Basic properties of Sobolev's spaces on time scales. Advances in Difference Equations 2006, 2006:14.Google Scholar
 Tisdell CC: On firstorder discrete boundary value problems. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2006,12(12):12131223. 10.1080/10236190600949790MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.