 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Switching Controller Design for a Class of Markovian Jump Nonlinear Systems Using Stochastic SmallGain Theorem
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2009, Article number: 896218 (2009)
Abstract
Switching controller design for a class of Markovian jump nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics is considered in this paper. Based on the differential equation and infinitesimal generator of jump systems, the concept of Jump InputtoState practical Stability (JISpS) in probability and stochastic Lyapunov stability criterion are put forward. By using backsetpping technology and stochastic smallgain theorem, a switching controller is proposed which ensures JISpS in probability for the jump nonlinear system. A simulation example illustrates the validity of this design.
1. Introduction
Stability of dynamic systems has been the primary study topic for system analysis. After Lyapunov's second method was created in 1892, it has been developed and applied by many researchers in the past century with fruitful classical stability results achieved. Among these important developments is the InputtoState Stability (ISS) property, which was firstly formulated by Sontag [1] and has found wide use in engineering by incorporating the idea of nonlinear smallgain theorem [2, 3]. The ISSbased smallgain theorem has some advantages over the earlier passivitybased smallgain theorem and is currently becoming a desirable tool for nonlinear stability analysis, especially in the case of nonlinear robust stabilization for systems with nonlinear uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics [4, 5]. Among all the practical nonlinear systems with uncertainties, the systems of lowertriangular form are of great importance; such systems have several special properties so that they are recently attracting great attention. Firstly, the "lowertriangular" form has close connection with feedback linearzation method; therefore this provides convenience to designers. Second, many realworld dynamic systems are of lowertriangular form [6, 7], and some general systems can be transformed to lowertriangular form via mathematical method [8]. For this reason, lowertriangle nonlinear system can find its wide applications in lots of practical dynamic systems: turbine generator and water turbing generator [9], intelligent robot [10] and missile [11], and so forth. However, dynamic processes in this field are very difficult to describe exactly and depend on many factors. For example, imagining an attacking missile tracking a moving target, this dynamic process is a classical problem of model following and tracking; till now, different control algorithms have been put forward by using ideal assumptions [12, 13]. However, the missile itself may have variable structures subject to random changes and/or failures of its components or environments during its flight; such problems also occur in the case of the moving of robots or the operation of generators. Therefore, an urgent requirement appears to remodel such dynamic processes to meet the need of accuracy and precision.
On the other hand, Markovian jump systems, which were firstly put forward by Kac and Krasovskii [14], have now become convenient tools for representing many realworld systems [15, 16] and therefore arouse much research attention in recent years. In the case of fault detection, faulttolerant control, and multimodal control, discrete jumps in the continuous dynamics are used to model component failures and sudden switch of system dynamics. With further study of Markovian jump systems, many achievements have been made in the last decade, among which Shaikhet and Mao performed foundational work on stochastic stability for jump systems [17–19] and jump systems with time delays [20–23]. Based on the stochastic stability, more efforts are devoted to applications of jump system model: system state estimation [24, 25], controller design [26–28], and hierarchical reinforcement learning for modelfree jump systems [29, 30]. However, in the referred works concerned with controller design problems, assumptions are firstly made that system models considered only consist of static uncertainty. This is an ideal approximation of real situation and not the case nevertheless. As we know, Markovian jump systems are used to represent a class of systems which are usually accompanied by sudden change of working environment or system dynamics. For this reason, practical jump systems are usually accompanied by uncertainties, and it is hard to describe these uncertainties, with precise mathematical model. Thus, how to stabilize Markovian jump systems with unmodeled dynamic uncertainties is a concernful work in our view.
In this paper, we focus on the switching controller design for a class of Markovian jump nonlinear systems with dynamic uncertainties. The control strategy ensures robustness property of systems in the presentence of dynamic uncertainties. And our main contributions are composed of three aspects.

(i)
Stochastic differential equation for Markovian jump system is given according to generalized Itô formula, and the similar result is achieved by Yuan and Mao [19] with a different method. Based on differential equation, the martingale process caused by Markovian process is incarnated in the procedure of controller design by applying mathematical transform.

(ii)
We introduce the concept of Jump InputtoState practical Stability (JISpS) and give stochastic Lyapunov stability criterion.

(iii)
By composing backstepping technology and stochastic smallgain theorem, a switching controller is proposed. It is shown that all signals of the closedloop system are globally uniformly ultimately bounded. And the closedloop system is JISpS in probability.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 begins with some mathematical notions and Markovian jump system model along with its differential equation. In Section 3, we introduce the notion of JISpS and stochastic Lyapunov stability criterion. Section 4 presents the problem description. In Section 5, a switching controller is given based on backstepping technology and stochastic smallgain theorem. In Section 6, an example is shown to illustrate the validity of the design. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 7.
2. Stochastic Differential Equation of Markovian Jump System
Throughout the paper, unless otherwise specified, we denote by a complete probability space with a filtration satisfying the usual conditions (i.e., it is right continuous, and contains all null sets). Let stand for the usual Euclidean norm for a vector and stand for the supremum of vector over time period , that is, . The superscript will denote transpose, and we refer to as the trace for matrix. In addition, we use to denote the space of Lebesgue square integrable vector.
Take into account the following Markovian jump nonlinear system:
where , and is the state vector and input vector of the system, respectively. is a rightcontinuous Markov chain on the probability space taking values in finite state space , and is dimensional independent standard Wiener process defined on the probability space, which is independent of the Markov chain . The functions and are locally Lipschitz in , for all , namely, for any , there is a constant such that
Consider the rightcontinuous Markov chain , and we introduce , the indicator process for the regime , as
And satisfies the following differential equation [15]:
with , an martingale satisfying , and the chain generator, an matrix. The entries are interpreted as transition rates such that
where and satisfies . Here is the transition rate from regime to regime . Notice that the total probability axiom imposes negative and
Let denote the family of all functions on which are continuously twice differentiable in and once in . Furthermore, we will give the stochastic differentiable equation of .
Fix any ; by the generalized Itô formula, we have
According to (2.4), the differential equation of the indicator is as following:
Submit (2.8) into (2.7) and notice that
There is
Therefore, the stochastic differentiable equation of is given by the following:
We take the expectation in (2.11), so that the the infinitesimal generator produces [18, 19, 23]
Remark 2.1.
The differential equation of Markovian jump system (2.1) is given as above and, the similar result is also achieved by Yuan and Mao [19]. Compared with the differential equation of general nonjump systems, two parts come forth as differences: transition rates and the martingale process , which are both caused by the property of Markov chain (see (2.4)). Up till now, switching controller design for jump systems contains only the transition rate in most cases. In this paper, the controller design will take into account the martingale process as well since the jump systems considered here are of the form of lower triangular. The detailed description will be given in Section 4.
3. JISpS and Stochastic SmallGain Theorem
Definition 3.1.
Markovian jump system (2.1) is moment Jump InputtoState practically Stable (JISpS) if there exist function , function , and a constant such that
Definition 3.2.
Markovian jump system (2.1) is JISpS in probability if for any given there exist function , function , and a constant such that
Remark 3.3.
The concept of InputtoState Stability (ISS) is a wellknown classical tool for designing nonlinear systems, which means for a bounded control input , the trajectories remain in the ball of radius as ; furthermore, as time increases, all trajectories approach the smaller ball of radius . However, for general nonlinear systems disturbed by noise and/or unmodeled dynamics, it is impossible to obtain such strong conclusion, therefore some generalized results are put forward: NoisetoState Stability (NSS) [31] and InputtoState practically Stable (ISpS) [32]. In the definition of ISpS, the trajectories remain in the ball of radius as instead of . Similar to ISS, as time increases, all trajectories approach the smaller ball of radius , and the system is still BIBO. As can be seen in the following analysis of this paper, bound can be made as small as possible by choosing appropriate control parameters. For some special cases, if , the ISpS is reduced to ISS.
Remark 3.4.
The definition of InputtoState practically Stable (ISpS) in probability for nonjump stochastic system is put forward by Wu et al. [32], and the difference between JISpS in probability and ISpS in probability lies in the expressions of system state and control signal . For nonjump system, system state and control signal contain only continuous time with , while for jump system, they concern with both continuous time and discrete regime . For different system dynamic , control signal will differ even with the same time taken and that is the reason why it is called a switching controller. Based on the idea of switching control, the corresponding stability is called " Jump ISpS" and it is a more general extension of ISpS. By choosing , the definition of JISpS will degenerate to ISpS.
Remark 3.5.
This paper introduces two kinds of JISpS in the sense of stochastic stability: moment JISpS and JISpS in probability. According to the knowledge of stochastic process, if one system is moment stochastically stable, it must be stochastically stable in probability by using martingale inequality. Here only sufficient conditions for moment stochastic stability are considered and now introduce the following stochastic Lyapunov stability criterion.
Theorem 3.6.
For Markovian jump system (2.1), let be positive numbers. Assume that there exist a function , a function , and constants , satisfying
for all , then jump system (2.1) is pth moment JISpS and JISpS in probability as well.
Proof.
Clearly the conclusion holds if . So we only need proof for . Fix such arbitrarily, we write as .
For each integer , define a stopping time as
Obviously, almost surely as . Noticing that if , we can apply the generalized Itô formula to derive that for any
Let , apply Fatou's lemma to (3.6), and we have
According to Mean value theorems for integration, there is
Noticing the property of function, the following inequality is deduced:
Submitting (3.3) into (3.9) gives
Consequently,
In (3.11), define function , function , and positive constant as:
There is
This completes the proof.
Consider the jump interconnected dynamic system described in Figure 1:
where is the state of system, and denotes exterior disturbance and/or interior uncertainty. is independent Wiener noise with appropriate dimension, and we introduce the following stochastic nonlinear smallgain theorem as a lemma, which is an extension of the corresponding result in Wu et al. [32].
Lemma 3.7 (Stochastic smallgain theorem).
Suppose that both the system and system are JISpS in probability with as input and as state, and as input and as state, respectively, that is, for any given ,
hold with being function, and being functions, and being nonnegative constants, . If there exist nonnegative parameters such that nonlinear gain functions satisfy
the interconnected system is JISpS in probability with as input and as state, that is, for any given , there exist a function , a function , and a parameter such that
Remark 3.8.
Smallgain theorem for nonlinear systems was firstly provided by Mareels and Hill [33] and was extended to the stochastic case by Wu et al. [32]. The above stochastic smallgain theorem for jump systems is an extension of the nonjump case. This extension can be achieved without any mathematical difficulties, and the proof process is the same as in [32]. The reason is that in Lemma 3.7 we only take into account the interconnection relationships between interconnected system and its subsystems, despite subsystems are of jump or nonjump case. If both subsystems are nonjump and ISpS in probability, respectively, the interconnected system is ISpS in probability. In contrast, if both subsystems are jump and JISpS in probability, respectively, the interconnected system is JISpS in probability and so on.
4. Problem Description
Consider the following Markovian jump nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics described by
where is system state vector, is system input signal, is unmeasured state vector, and is output signal. The Markov chain is as defined in Section 2. is a smooth function, and denotes the unmodeled dynamic uncertainty which could be different with different system regime . Both and are locally Lipschitz as described in Section 2.
Our design purpose is to find a switching controller of the form , such that the closedloop jump system could be JISpS in probability, and the system output could be within an attractive region around the equilibrium point with radius as small as possible. In this paper, the following assumptions are made for jump system (4.1):
(A1)The subsystem with input is JISpS in probability, namely, there exists a smooth positive definite Lyapunov function such that
where is function, is positive integer, and are constants.
(A2)For each , , there exists an unknown positive constant such that
where is known constant and are known nonnegative smooth functions for any given .
For the design of switching controller, we introduce the following lemmas.
Lemma 4.1 (Young's inequality).
For any two vectors , the following inequality holds
where and the constants satisfy .
Lemma 4.2 (Martingale representation [34]).
Let be Ndimensional standard Wiener noise. Suppose is an martingale (w.r.t. P) and that , for all , then there exists a stochastic process , such that
5. Controller Design and Stability Analysis
Now we seek the switching controller for jump system (4.1) so that the closedloop system could be JISpS in probability. Perform a new transformation as
For simplicity, we just denote , by , , , , where , and the new coordinate is .
According to stochastic differential equation (2.11), one has:
Here we define
From assumption (A2), one gets that there exist nonnegative smooth functions , satisfying
The inequality (5.4) could easily be deduced by using Lemma 4.1.
Now we turn to the martingale process ; according to Lemma 4.2, there exist a function and an dimensional standard Wiener noise satisfying , where , and is a positive bounded constant. Therefore we have
Remark 5.1.
Differential equation of new coordinate is deduced as above. The martingale process resulting from Markov process is transformed into Wiener noise by using Martingale representation theorem, and it will affect the Lyapunov function construction and affect the remainder of the control design process; for nonjump systems with uncertainty, a quadratic Lyapunov is chosen to meet control performance in most cases [32, 35, 36]. However, for jump systems, this choice will fail because of the existence of martingale process (or Wiener noise). To solve this problem, we suggest using quartic Lyapunov function instead of quadratic one, and this will increase largely the difficulty of design.
Choose the quartic Lyapunov function as
In the view of (5.5) and (5.6), the infinitesimal generator of satisfies
The following inequalities could be deduced by using Young's inequality and norm inequalities with the help of changing the order of summations or exchanging the indices of the summations:
where , and are design parameters.
Based on assumption (A2) and (5.4), we obtain the following inequality by applying Lemma 4.1:
Here , are design parameters.
Submit (5.9) into (5.7), there is
Choose the virtual control signal as
Thus the real control signal is such that
where , , and function is chosen to satisfy .
Theorem 5.2.
If Assumptions (A1) and (A2) hold and a switching control law (5.11) is adopted, the interconnected Markovian jump system (4.1) is JISpS in probability, and all solutions of closedloop system are ultimately bounded. Furthermore, the system output could be regulated to a small neighborhood of the equilibrium point with preset precision in probability within finite time.
Proof.
From Assumption (A1), the subsystem is JISpS in probability. There exist such that
Considering (5.12), for any given , there is
Notice the fact that stands up as long as and vice versa. Thus we have
In (5.15), appropriate parameter can be chosen to satisfy .
According to Theorem 3.6 and (5.12), with switching controller adopted, the subsystem of jump system (4.1) is JISpS in probability with as system state and as input, which means for any given , there exists function , function , and such that
On the other hand, according to Assumption (A1), there is
Similarly, by choosing parameter , for any given , there exist function , function , and such that
Here parameter can be chosen to satisfy .
By combining (5.16) and (5.18) we choose parameters guaranteeing that
According to stochastic smallgain theorem, for any given , there exists function such that
where , is given as in [32]. From (5.20) it can be seen that all solutions of closedloop system are ultimately bounded in probability.
According to (5.20) and the property of function, for any given , there exists . If , there is . At the same time by choosing approximate parameter, it can be guaranteed that .
Let , thus we have that for any given , there exists and such that if , the output of jump system satisfies
meanwhile can be made as small as possible by choosing approximate parameters . The proof is completed.
Remark 5.3.
Theorem 5.2 shows that if both subsystem and subsystem are JISpS in probability, the jump system (4.1) is JISpS in probability with appropriate control parameters chosen. Meanwhile the system output can be regulated to a small region in probability with preset precision within finite time. In the following simulation, we will show how different parameters affect the system states and output.
6. Simulation
Consider a twoorder Markovian jump nonlinear system with regime transition space , and the transition rate matrix is .
The system with unmodeled dynamics is as follows:
Here
From Assumption (A2), we have
where , , and the subsystem satisfies
where , , . Thus the control law is taken as follows (here ).
Case 1.
The system regime is :
Case 2.
The system regime is :
In computation, we set the initial value to be , and the time step to be 0.05 second. For comparison, two groups of different control parameters are given. First, we take the parameter with values , , , and the simulation results are as follows. Figure 2 shows the regime transition of the jump system, and Figure 3 shows the corresponding switching controller . Figure 4 shows the system output which is defined as the system state , and Figure 5 shows system state .
Now we choose different control parameters as , , and repeat the simulation. The simulation results are as follows. Figure 6 shows the regime transition of the jump system, and Figure 7 shows the corresponding switching controller . Figure 8 shows the system output which is defined as the system state , and Figure 9 shows system state .
Comparing the results from two simulations, all the signals of closedloop system are globally uniformly ultimately bounded, and the system output can be regulated to a neighborhood near the equilibrium point despite of different experiment samples. As can be seen from the figures, larger values of help to increase the convergence speed of system states while larger value of and smaller values of help to increase the precision. If one wants the system states to converge to the neighborhood of the equilibrium point with fast speed and an acceptable precision, one should increase the value of and decrease though this choice will increase the cost of control signals.
Remark 6.1.
Much research work has been performed toward the study of nonlinear system by using smallgain theorem [4, 32, 33]. In contrast to their contributions, this paper focuses on the switching controller design for Markovian jump nonlinear system which is a more general form of nonjump systems. For each different regime , the actual controller is different, and it consists of two parts with obvious difference (see (5.11)): the coupling of regime and , which are both caused by the Markovian jumps (see (2.4)). By defining regime , the above two terms will reduce to zero. Thus this switching controller design is capable of stabilizing the general nonjump system as well.
7. Conclusion
In this paper, the authors take into account switching controller design for a class of Markovian jump nonlinear system with unmodeled dynamics. Based on the differential equation and infinitesimal generator of jump systems, the concept of Jump InputtoState Stability (JISpS) and stochastic Lyapunov stability criterion are put forward. Moreover, the martingale process caused by the stochastic Markovian jumps is converted into Wiener noise. By using backstepping technology and stochastic smallgain theorem, a switching controller is proposed which ensures JISpS in probability of the jump nonlinear system. And system output can be regulated in probability to a small neighborhood of the equilibrium point with preset precision. The result presented in this paper also stands for the general nonjump system.
References
 1.
Sontag ED: Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1989,34(4):435443. 10.1109/9.28018
 2.
Khalil HK: Nonlinear Systems. 2nd edition. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1996.
 3.
Kokotović PV, Arcak M: Constructive nonlinear control: a historical perspective. Automatica 2001,37(5):637662.
 4.
Jiang ZP: A combined backstepping and smallgain approach to adaptive output feedback control. Automatica 1999,35(6):11311139. 10.1016/S00051098(99)000151
 5.
Jiang ZP, Mareels I, Hill D: Robust control of uncertain nonlinear systems via measurement feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1999,44(4):807812. 10.1109/9.754823
 6.
Krstić M, Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotović PV: Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1995.
 7.
Seto D, Annaswamy AM, Baillieul J: Adaptive control of nonlinear systems with a triangular structure. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1994,39(7):14111428. 10.1109/9.299624
 8.
Čelikovský S, Nijmeijer H: Equivalence of nonlinear systems to triangular form: the singular case. Systems & Control Letters 1996,27(3):135144. 10.1016/01676911(95)000593
 9.
Chen H, Ji HB, Wang B, Xi HS: Coordinated passivation techniques for the dualexcited and steamvalving control of synchronous generators. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications 2006,153(1):6973. 10.1049/ipcta:20045016
 10.
Jiang ZP, Nijmeijer H: Tracking control of mobile robots: a case study in backstepping. Automatica 1997,33(7):13931399. 10.1016/S00051098(97)000551
 11.
Do KD, Jiang ZP, Pan J: On global tracking control of a VTOL aircraft without velocity measurements. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2003,48(12):22122217. 10.1109/TAC.2003.820148
 12.
Chang YC, Yen HM: Adaptive output feedback tracking control for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 2005,35(6):13111316. 10.1109/TSMCB.2005.850158
 13.
Cai Z, de Queiroz MS, Dawson DM: Robust adaptive asymptotic tracking of nonlinear systems with additive disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2006,51(3):524529. 10.1109/TAC.2005.864204
 14.
Kac IYa, Krasovskii NN: About stability of systems with stochastic parameters. Prikladnaya Matematika i Makhanika 1960,24(5):809823.
 15.
Mariton M: Jump Linear Systems in Automatic Control. MarcelDekker, New York, NY, USA; 1990.
 16.
Kac IYa: Method of Lyapunov functions in problems of stability and stabilization of systems of stochastic structure. Ekaterinburg, Russia, 1998
 17.
Shaikhet L: Stability of stochastic hereditary systems with Markovian switching. Theory of Stochastic Process 1996,2(18):180184.
 18.
Mao X: Stability of stochastic differential equations with Markovian switching. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 1999,79(1):4567. 10.1016/S03044149(98)000702
 19.
Yuan C, Mao X: Asymptotic stability in distribution of stochastic differential equations with Markovian switching. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 2003,103(2):277291. 10.1016/S03044149(02)002302
 20.
Mao X, Shaikhet L: Delaydependent stability criteria for stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching. Stability and Control: Theory and Applications 2000,3(2):88102.
 21.
Mao X: Robustness of stability of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching. Stability and Control: Theory and Applications 2000,3(1):4861.
 22.
Mao X: Asymptotic stability for stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching. Functional Differential Equations 2002,9(12):201220.
 23.
Yuan C, Mao X: Robust stability and controllability of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching. Automatica 2004,40(3):343354. 10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.012
 24.
de Souza CE, Trofino A, Barbosa KA:Modeindependent filters for Markovian jump linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2006,51(11):18371841.
 25.
Zhu J, Park J, Lee KS, Spiryagin M: Robust extended Kalman filter of discretetime Markovian jump nonlinear system under uncertain noise. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2008,22(6):11321139. 10.1007/s122060071048z
 26.
Nguang SK, Shi P:Robust output feedback control design for TakagiSugeno systems with Markovian jumps: a linear matrix inequality approach. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 2006,128(3):617625. 10.1115/1.2232686
 27.
Zhu J, Xi HS, Ji HB, Wang B: Robust adaptive tracking for Markovian jump nonlinear systems with unknown nonlinearities. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2006, 2006:18.
 28.
Jin Z, Hongsheng X, Xiaobo X, Haibo J: Guaranteed control performance robust LQG regulator for discretetime Markovian jump systems with uncertain noise. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 2007,18(4):885891. 10.1016/S10044132(08)600365
 29.
Chen C, Li HX, Dong D: Hybrid control for robot navigation: a hierarchical Qlearning algorithm. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 2008,15(2):3747.
 30.
Dong D, Chen C, Li H, Tarn TJ: Quantum reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 2008,38(5):12071220.
 31.
Deng H, Krstić M, Williams RJ: Stabilization of stochastic nonlinear systems driven by noise of unknown covariance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2001,46(8):12371253. 10.1109/9.940927
 32.
Wu ZJ, Xie XJ, Zhang SY: Adaptive backstepping controller design using stochastic smallgain theorem. Automatica 2007,43(4):608620. 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.10.020
 33.
Mareels IMY, Hill DJ: Monotone stability of nonlinear feedback systems. Journal of Mathematical Systems, Estimation, and Control 1992,2(3):275291.
 34.
Øksendal B: Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2000.
 35.
Polycarpou MM, Ioannou PA: A robust adaptive nonlinear control design. Automatica 1996,32(3):423427. 10.1016/00051098(95)001476
 36.
Wang B, Ji H, Zhu J, Xiao X: Robust adaptive control of polynomial lowertriangular systems with dynamic uncertainties. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA '06), June 2006, Dalian, China 1: 815819.
Acknowledgment
This work has been funded by BK21 research project: Switching Control of Systems with Structure Uncertainty and Noise.
Author information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Received
Revised
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Infinitesimal Generator
 Markovian Jump
 Unmodeled Dynamic
 Markovian Jump System
 Switching Controller