- Research Article
- Open Access
Absolute Stability of Discrete-Time Systems with Delay
© Rigoberto Medina. 2008
- Received: 18 October 2007
- Accepted: 22 November 2007
- Published: 30 December 2007
We investigate the stability of nonlinear nonautonomous discrete-time systems with delaying arguments, whose linear part has slowly varying coefficients, and the nonlinear part has linear majorants. Based on the "freezing" technique to discrete-time systems, we derive explicit conditions for the absolute stability of the zero solution of such systems.
- Lyapunov Function
- Homogeneous Equation
- Absolute Stability
- Linear Delay
- Cauchy Function
Over the past few decades, discrete-time systems with delay have drawn much attention from the researchers. This is due to their important role in many practical systems. The stability of time-delay systems is a fundamental problem because of its importance in the analysis of such systems.The basic method for stability analysis is the direct Lyapunov method, for example, see [1–3], and by this method, strong results have been obtained. But finding Lyapunov functions for nonautonomous delay difference systems is usually a difficult task. In contrast, many methods different from Lyapunov functions have been successfully applied to establish stability results for difference equations with delay, for example, see [3–12].
This paper deals with the absolute stability of nonlinear nonautonomous discrete-time systems with delay, whose linear part has slowly varying coefficients, and the nonlinear part satisfies a Lipschitz condition.
The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach developed in  for linear nonautonomous delay difference systems to the nonlinear case with delaying arguments. Our approach is based on the "freezing" technique for discrete-time systems. This method has been used to investigate properties as well as to the construction of solutions for systems of linear differential equations. So, it is commonly used in analysing the stability of slowly varying initial-value problems as well as solving them, for example, see [13, 14]. However, its use to difference equations is rather new . The stability conditions will be formulated assuming that we know the Cauchy solution (fundamental solution) of the unperturbed system.
The paper is organized as follows. After some preliminaries in Section 2, the sufficient conditions for the absolute stability are presented in Section 3. In Section 4, we reduce a delay difference system to a delay-free linear system of higher dimension, thus obtaining explicit stability conditions for the solutions.
where is an integer and
where is a given vector-valued function, that is,
where ; ; ,
for any solution of (2.2) with the initial conditions (2.3).
It is clear that every solution of the initial-valued problem (2.2)-(2.3) exists, is unique and can be constructed recursively from (2.2).
In order to state and prove our main results, we need some suitable lemmas and theorems.
Lemma 2.2 (see ).
Lemma 2.3 (see ).
In , was established the following stability result in terms of the Cauchy solution of (2.9).
Theorem 2.4 (see ).
holds with constant , and independent of . If in addition, conditions (2.4), (2.5), and are fulfilled, then (2.16) is stable.
Our purpose is to generalize this result to the nonlinear problem (2.2)-(2.3).
Lemma 2.5 (see ).
is valid, where , and
This yields the required result.
where , and
Now, Corollary 3.2 yields the following result.
hold. Then, the zero solution of (2.2)-(2.3) is absolutely stable in the class of nonlinearities in (2.6).
where is a solution of (2.2) and
This fact proves the required result.
Theorem 3.3 is exact in the sense that if (2.2) is a homogeneous linear stable equation with constant matrices , then , and condition (3.29) is always fulfilled.
It is somewhat inconvenient that to apply either condition (3.26) or (3.29), one has to assume explicit knowledge of the constants and . In the next theorem, we will derive sufficient conditions for the exponential growth of the Cauchy function associated to (2.9). Thus, our conditions may provide a useful tool for applications.
Theorem 3.5 (see ).
Now, we will consider the homogeneous equation (2.16), thus establishing the following consequence of Theorem 3.3.
hold. Then the zero solution of (2.16)–(2.3) is absolutely stable.
and . And , , are positive bounded sequences withthe following properties: and and ; , are nonnegative constants for . This yields that and , respectively, for . Thus .
for a fixed tends to zero exponentially as that is, there exist constants and such that ;
If , then by Theorem 3.3, it follows that the zero solution of (3.39) is absolutely stable.
then it is not hard to check that the Cauchy solution of this system tends to zero exponentially as Hence, by Theorem 3.3, it follows that the zero solution of (3.39) is absolutely stable provided that the relation (3.29) is satisfied.
where and are variable -matrices.
In , were established very nice solution representation formulae to the system
assuming that and However, the stability problem was not investigated in this paper.
where are -matrices, By means of a characteristic equation, they established many results concerning the stability of the solutions of such equation. However, the case of variable coefficients is not studied in this article.
In the next corollary, we will apply Theorem 3.3 to this particular case of (2.2), thus obtaining the following corollary.
Under condition (3.25), one assumes that
(i)the matrices and satisfy and , respectively, for
Then, the zero solution of (4.1)-(2.3) is absolutely stable.
I want to point out that this approach is just of interest for systems with "slowly changing" matrices.
where is the unit matrix in
holds for every nonnegative integer , where is the spectral radius of .
Theorem 4.3 (see ).
where , with defined in (2.14).
where and .
This approach is usually not applicable to the time-varying delay case, because the transformed systems usually have time-varying matrix coefficients, which are difficult to analyze using available tools. Hence, our results will provide new tools to analyze these kind of systems.
The author thanks the referees of this paper for their careful reading and insightful critiques. This research was supported by Fondecyt Chile under Grant no. 1.070.980.
- Agarwal RP: Difference Equations and Inequalities. Theory, Methods, and Applications, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Volume 155. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA; 1992:xiv+777.Google Scholar
- Lakshmikantham V, Trigiante D: Theory of Difference Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 181. Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA; 1988:x+242.Google Scholar
- Vidyasagar M: Nonlinear Syatems Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1978.Google Scholar
- Diblík J, Khusainov DYa:Representation of solutions of discrete delayed system with commutative matrices. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 318(1):63-76. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.021MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elayi S, Zhang S: Stability and periodicity of difference equations with finite delay. Funkcialaj Ekvacioj 1994, 37(3):401-413.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kipnis M, Komissarova D: Stability of delay difference system. Advances in Difference Equations 2006, 2006:-9.Google Scholar
- Medina R: Stability analysis of nonautonomous difference systems with delaying arguments. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007, 335(1):615-625. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.053MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pituk M: Convergence and uniform stability in a nonlinear delay difference system. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 1995, 22(2):51-57. 10.1016/0895-7177(95)00110-NMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pituk M: Global asymptotic stability in a perturbed higher-order linear difference equation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2003, 45(6–9):1195-1202.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schinas J: Stability and conditional stability of time-dependent difference equations in Banach spaces. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications 1974, 14(3):335-346. 10.1093/imamat/14.3.335MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S: Estimate of total stability of delay difference systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 1999, 37(9):31-38. 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00111-XMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuruklis SA:The asymptotic stability of . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1994, 188(3):719-731. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1457MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shahruz SM, Schwarz AL: An approximate solution for linear boundary-value problems with slowly varying coefficients. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1994, 60(2-3):285-298. 10.1016/0096-3003(94)90110-4MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qu R, Agarwal RP: Improved error bounds for freezing solutions of linear boundary value problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1998, 94(2-3):97-112. 10.1016/S0096-3003(97)10067-4MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gil MI, Medina R: The freezing method for linear difference equations. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2002, 8(5):485-494. 10.1080/10236190290017478MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.